DOCSLIB.ORG

ADAS Consulting Ltd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ADAS Consulting Ltd ADAS Consulting Ltd A directory of activity to reduce diffuse water pollution from agriculture in priority catchments FINAL Revised 27/05/05 R. Humphrey, C. Procter, P. Kay and M. Shepherd ADAS Gleadthorpe Meden Vale Mansfield Nottingham NG20 9PF Executive Summary The intensification of agricultural production over recent decades has been characterised by increasing inputs, including agrochemicals such as fertilisers and pesticides. A consequence of this has been the movement of these chemicals to surface water bodies in runoff. Diffuse sources are becoming increasingly dominant in terms of environmental effects as point sources, such as sewage discharges, are being better managed to reduce pollution. Subsequent impacts of diffuse pollution have been investigated, and effects on ecological status have been observed in some instances. For example, English Nature has recently identified105 conservation sites throughout England that they assessed as being degraded by receiving pollutants from agriculture. Combating diffuse pollution from agriculture is one of Defra’s key priorities and actions will be necessary to meet the demands of the Water Framework Directive, which requires that ‘good ecological quality’ be achieved in water bodies. To address diffuse pollution, Defra has launched it’s Catchment Sensitive Farming initiative. The project reported here is in support of this initiative. The aim was to establish what support activities are in place in selected catchments to engage with land managers with the aim of finding solutions to diffuse pollution. Examples include farmer groups and demonstration projects. The emphasis is on the engagement process, rather than the technical measures to decrease pollution. Investigations focused on the 105 priority sites identified by English Nature. Many farmers had been involved in engagement processes at the time their particular catchment was designated as a conservation site. In most cases, however, any involvement in decision making has since lapsed. The general impression gained during research for this report is that even in catchments where there is a lot of DWPA activity taking place, it is often disparate. There may be a number of active organisations working with farmers, but they are not necessarily aware that each other exists. A cohesive, catchment-wide, approach is desirable if we are to meet future targets for management of diffuse pollution issues. Whilst some areas of the country had a fairly extensive amount of DWPA activity, for example Northumberland in the North East, Herefordshire in the West Midlands and the South West in general, other areas had virtually none at all, for example many parts of the Eastern region. However, it is important to note that the investigation was pinpointed specifically at the 105 individual priority sites (as identified by English Nature). Many sites are small and it is possible that activity would not be initiated for these alone, as they may not attract so much interest and resources, although wider catchment initiatives may result in benefits for them. In some cases the sites were particularly small and hence have been grouped together. In carrying out this work, it has become evident that co-ordination of activities to reduce DWPA is very limited. Whilst every effort has been made to identify all the activity that is taking place, it should be stressed that this lack of co-ordination may mean that some projects have been missed. It is hoped that the body of knowledge on DWPA activity will continue to grow as more projects relevant to Catchment Sensitive Farming begin. The development of the CSF website in support of this research will enable any projects that have not been identified, and those starting up, to be registered. The website will provide a dynamic resource to be used both to inform policy decisions and facilitate better communication between key stakeholder groups. A summary of those projects identified in the current study is provided below. 1 A summary of DWPA activity in priority catchments Region County Site name Level of Key stakeholders Example projects activity North East Northumbria Tweed Catchment Rivers High FWAG, EA, NNTA, Northumbrian Rivers Project, River Coquet & Coquet Valley Woodlands Medium Tweed Forum, ADAS, Coquet Catchment Pesticides Lindisfarne Low Northumbrian Water Study, EA LINK Teesmouth & Cleveland Coast Medium Yorkshire Hornsea Mere Low EN, EA, FWAG Lower Derwent Project River Derwent Low Yorkshire Wildlife Trust North West Cumbria Bassenthwai te Lake Medium LDSWP, CEH, EA, EN, Biglands Bog Low FBA, LDNPA, NT, FC, Cliburn Moss N/A RDS, RSPB Cumwhitton Moss N/A Moorthwaite Moss N/A Newton Reigny Moss N/A River Derwent & Tributaries Medium Temple Sowerby Moss Low Lancashire Hawes Water Low EA, FWAG, MBC Mersey Basin Campaign Leighton Moss Low ICREW East Midlands Derbyshire Cressbrook Dale Medium EN, FWAG, PDNPA, EA Vision Project Dove Valley & Biggin Dale Low Lathkill Dale Low Leicestershire Bla ckbrook Reservoir Low EA, EN, FWAG, NFU, Bradgate Park & Cropston Reservoir Low Leicestershire & Rutland Buddon Wood & Swithland Reservoir Low Wildlife Trust River Eye High River Mease High Lincolnshire Hatfield Chase Ditches Medium FW AG, NFU, Lincolnshire Wildlife Trust West Midlands Herefordshire River Lugg High FWAG, EN, ADAS, PSYCHIC, Wye Grazers Project, River Wye High Reading University, WYECARE River Teme Low CEH, EA, NFU Herefordshire Wildlife Trust Shropshire Clarepool Moss Low EA, EN NUPHAR Fenemere Low 2 Region County Site name Level of Key stakeholders Example projects activity Fenn’s, Whixall, Bettisfield, Wem & Low Marton Pool N/A Sweat Mere & Crose Mere Lo w Staffordshire Aqualate Mere N/A EA, EN NUPHAR Betley Mere N/A Black Firs & Cranberry Bog N/A Cop Mere N/A Warwickshire Birches Barn Meadow N/A EN River Blythe Low East Bedfordshire Flitwick Moor Medium BWT, GT, BCV Cambridg e Ouse Washes Medium EA, EN, Cam Forum, Cam Sustainable Farming NFU, RDS, BAWAG Project Essex Abberton Reservoir Low Essex Wildlife Trust, Blackwater Estuary Low Stour & Orwell Estuaries Colne Estuary N/A Management Group, EN Crouch & Roach Estuaries N/A Hamford Water N/A Hanningfield Reservoir N/A Stour Estuary N/A Hunsdon Mead Low Norfolk Muckfleet Catchment Low EA, EN, NFU, RDS, River Ant Catchment Low BAWAG, Norfolk River Bure Catchment High Wildlife Trust River Thurne catchment Low River Waveney catchment High River Wensum catchment High River Yare Catchment High Suffolk Alde -Ore Estuary N/A Suffolk Estuaries Deben Initiative, Little Ouse Bamby Broad Low Management Group, Headwaters Project Benacre to Eastern Bavents N/A RSPB, FWAG, Bio Blo’ Norton & Thelnetham Fen Low Norton Fen Conservation Chippenham Fen Low Group Deben Estuary Low Halvergate Marshes Low Minsmere -Walberswick Heaths and N/A 3 Region County Site name Level of Key stakeholders Example projects activity Orwell Estuary Medium Redgrave & Lopham Fens Low Sprat’s Water & Marshes N/A Water End Swallow Holes N/A Weston Fen N/A South East Kent River Beult Medium EA, EN, FWAG Promoting Good Farm Practice Sandwich Bay to Hacklinge marshes N/A The Swale N/A Walland Marsh N/A Sussex Chichester Harbour Medium FWAG, EA, NFU WILDCRU Combe Haven Low Oxford University Pevensey Levels Low Oxon, Berks, Cothill Fen N/A FWAG, EA, ADAS, NFU, LANDCARE Wilts & Hants River Avon System High Wildlife Trusts, PSYCHIC River Itchen High Hampshire County, LANDWISE River Kennet High Wessex Water Wessex Water Biodiversity River L ambourn Medium River Test High River Till Medium Stanford End Mill & River Loddon Low South West Somerset Bridgwater Bay (Pawlett Hams) Low North Devon & Somerset North Somerset Levels & Moors North Somerset Moors Medium Coastal Group , RSPB, Project Somerset Levels & Moors High FWAG, Avon Wildlife Trust, NT Devon Erme Estuary Medium Westcountry Rivers Trust Life into Landscape Exe Estuary Medium FWAG Slapton Cycleau Project River Axe Medium Axe & Char Enhancement Salombe to Kingsbridge Estuary Low Project Slapton Ley Medium Stover Park N/A Yealm Estuary N/A Dorset Chesil and The Fleet Medium FWAG, EA, EN Fleet Hinterland Project Frome St Quintin Low LOCAR Poole Harbour N/A Rempstone H eaths N/A 4 Region County Site name Level of Key stakeholders Example projects activity River Frome Medium Studland & Godlingston Heaths Low Toller Porcorum N/A Cornwall Fal & Helford High Westcountry Rivers Trust Cornwall Rivers Trust Loe Pool Medium Cornwall Rivers Trust Fal & Helford Cycleau Project River Camel Medium FWAG, National Trust Tamar -Tavy Estuary Medium NA: No DWPA activity 5 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................8 2 AIM AND OBJECTIVES..................................................................................................10 3 METHODOLOGY.............................................................................................................11 3.1 GENERAL APPROACH ....................................................................................................11 3.2 DETAILED METHODOLOGY ...........................................................................................11 3.2.1 Stage 1 – Characterisation of location, land-use and hydrology ..........................11 3.2.2 Stage 2 – Identification of farmer activity and conservation projects...................11 4 CHARACTERISATION OF CATCHMENTS...............................................................13 4.1 THE NORTH EAST REGION ............................................................................................13
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appropriate Assessment (Submission)
    June 2007 North Norfolk District Council Planning Policy Team Telephone: 01263 516318 E-Mail: [email protected] Write to: Jill Fisher, Planning Policy Manager, North Norfolk District Council, Holt Road, Cromer, NR27 9EN www.northnorfolk.org/ldf All of the LDF Documents can be made available in Braille, large print or in other languages. Please contact 01263 516321 to discuss your requirements. Core Strategy Appropriate Assessment (Submission) Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 The Appropriate Assessment Process 4 3 Consultation and Preparation 5 4 Evidence gathering for the Appropriate Assessment 6 European sites that may be affected 6 Characteristics and conservation objectives of the European sites 8 Other relevant plans or projects 25 5 Appropriate Assessment and Plan analysis 28 Tables Table 4.1 - Broadland SPA/SAC qualifying features 9 Table 4.2 - Great Yarmouth North Denes SPA/SAC 12 Table 4.3 - North Norfolk Coast SPA/SAC qualifying features 15 Table 4.4 - Norfolk Valley Fens SAC qualifying features 19 Table 4.5 - Overstrand Cliffs SAC qualifying features 21 Table 4.6 - Paston Great Barn SAC qualifying features 23 Table 4.7 - River Wensum SAC qualifying features 24 Table 4.8 - Neighbouring districts Core Strategy progress table 27 Table 5.1 - Screening for likely significant effects 29 Table 5.2 - Details of Settlements in policies SS1, SS3, SS5 and SS7 to SS14 and how policy amendments have resulted in no likely significant effects being identified 35 Maps Map 4.1 - Environmental Designations 7 Map 4.2 - Broadland Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Fen Management Strategy - Explains the Role of the Strategy and Its Relationship to Other Documents
    CONTENTS Acknowledgements Purpose & use of the fen management strategy - explains the role of the strategy and its relationship to other documents Summary - outlines the need for a fen management strategy Introduction - Sets the picture of development and use of fens from their origins to present day Approach to producing strategy - Methodology to writing the fen management strategy Species requirements: This section provides a summary of our existing knowledge concerning birds, plants, mammals and invertebrates associated with the Broads fens. This information forms a basis for the fen management strategy. Vegetation resource Mammals Birds Invertebrates Summary of special features for each valley: This section mainly identifies the botanical features within each valley. The distribution of birds, mammals and invertebrates is either variable or unknown, and so has been covered only in a general sense in the section on species requirements. However, where there is obvious bird interest concentrated within particular valleys, this has been identified. The botanical section provides a summary analysis of the fen vegetation resource survey and considers the relative importance of fen vegetation in a local and national context. A summary of the chemical variables of the soils for each valley has also been included. Ant valley Bure valley Muckfleet valley Thurne valley Waveney valley Yare valley The fen resource for the future: Identifies aims and objectives to restore fens to favourable nature conservation state Environmental constraints and opportunities - Using the fen management strategy: - During the fen vegetation resource survey, chemical variables of the substratum associated with various plant communities were measured. The purpose of these measurements was to provide some indication of the importance of substrate to the plant communities.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX 5A – Schedule of Proposed Policies Map Changes June 2019
    APPENDIX 5A – Schedule of Proposed Policies Map Changes June 2019 Schedule of Proposed Changes to the Pre-Submission Local Plan Policies Map A Planning Inspector is examining the Chelmsford City Council Local Plan as submitted by the Council on 29 June 2018. As part of the examination process a number of proposed modifications to the Pre-Submission Local Plan have been identified. These modifications are either classified as "main" or "additional" modifications and are set out in the updated main and additional modification schedules, March 2019. The policies map is not defined in statute as a development plan document and so the Inspector does not have the power to recommend main modifications to it. However the Council must maintain an adopted policies map which accurately illustrates geographically the application of the policies in the adopted development plan. Therefore, this schedule sets out a number of changes to the policies map which are in response to specific modifications to policies set out in the main modifications schedule. Other changes are also included to reflect the additional modifications schedule. The related main or additional modification reference number is included in the schedule below. Where changes are factual only there is no main or additional modification reference included. Accompanying this schedule are inset maps showing the specific changes in map form, where applicable. Please note maps have not been produced if the only change is to the title. It should be noted that at the point of adoption the latest OS base mapping will be applied to the policies map and insets. This may result in minor changes occurring to notation boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Hooke Court, Hooke, Dorset
    Wessex Archaeology Hooke Court, Hooke, Dorset Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of the Results Ref: 62502.01 December 2006 Hooke Court, Hooke, Dorset Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results Prepared on behalf of Videotext Communications Ltd 49 Goldhawk Road LONDON W12 8QP By Wessex Archaeology Portway House Old Sarum Park SALISBURY Wiltshire SP4 6EB Report reference: 62502.01 December 2006 © Wessex Archaeology Limited 2006, all rights reserved Wessex Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No. 287786 Hooke Court, Hooke, Dorset Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results Contents Summary Acknowledgements 1 BACKGROUND..................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction................................................................................................1 1.2 Site Location, Topography and Geology..................................................1 1.3 Historical Background...............................................................................1 Hooke Court.................................................................................................1 The Village of Stapleford .............................................................................3 1.4 Previous Archaeological Work .................................................................3 2 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES.................................................................................4 3 METHODS...........................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • The Frome 8, Piddle Catchmentmanagement Plan 88 Consultation Report
    N 6 L A “ S o u t h THE FROME 8, PIDDLE CATCHMENTMANAGEMENT PLAN 88 CONSULTATION REPORT rsfe ENVIRONMENT AGENCY NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE ANGLIAN REGION Kingfisher House. Goldhay Way. Orton Goldhay, Peterborough PE2 5ZR NRA National Rivers Authority South Western Region M arch 1995 NRA Copyright Waiver This report is intended to be used widely and may be quoted, copied or reproduced in any way, provided that the extracts are not quoted out of context and that due acknowledgement is given to the National Rivers Authority. Published March 1995 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY Hill IIII llll 038007 FROME & PIDDLE CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSULTATION REPORT YOUR VIEWS The Frome & Piddle is the second Catchment Management Plan (CMP) produced by the South Wessex Area of the National Rivers Authority (NRA). CMPs will be produced for all catchments in England and Wales by 1998. Public consultation is an important part of preparing the CMP, and allows people who live in or use the catchment to have a say in the development of NRA plans and work programmes. This Consultation Report is our initial view of the issues facing the catchment. We would welcome your ideas on the future management of this catchment: • Hdve we identified all the issues ? • Have we identified all the options for solutions ? • Have you any comments on the issues and options listed ? • Do you have any other information or ideas which you would like to bring to our attention? This document includes relevant information about the catchment and lists the issues we have identified and which need to be addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Abberton Reservoir Expansion Project the Story So
    Abberton Reservoir expansion project the story so far Abberton Reservoir is to be enlarged to increase its capacity by Contents more than 50% - but how did the reservoir come into being? 04 Introduction 06 History of the supply network 08 Construction of the reservoir 12 The main dam 14 Other reservoir structures 20 The war years 21 Air raids 22 Post war developments 23 Environmental history 2 | Abberton Reservoir Expansion Project Abberton Reservoir Expansion Project | 3 To Colchester Layer-de- From River Stour Birch ct No.3 la-Haye Intake Works N Malting Green Aquadu Layer-de-la-Haye Overflow from Treatment Works Gravel Lagoon Reservoir Introduction and Pumping Station 8 . Drain from Gravel Lagoon Works Entrance Aquaduct No.7 Aquaduct No Birch Green Aquaduct No.6 To South and Mid-Essex Divisions Abberton Pumping Station Limit of E.W.Co Abberton reservoir lies 4 miles to the southwest Land of Colchester, in the county of Essex, between the villages of Layer-de-la-Haye and Abberton. Constructed in the late 1930’s on the course of Limit of E.W.Co Land Layer Brook, which runs into the Roman River, it covers an area of 1210 acres, holds 26,000 mega Layer Brook litres (5,700 million gallons) of water and has a B1026 top water level of 17.8m AOD. To Maldon It was constructed to store water from winter rainfall for summer use as part of the water supply network for the southern half of Essex. Water is abstracted from the river Stour at Stratford St Mary and pumped 16 kilometers (11 miles) into the reservoir through 34” and 36” steel pipelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Church and Churchyard Memorial Inscriptions
    CHURCH AND CHURCHYARD MEMORIAL INSCRIPTIONS St MARY’S CHURCH FROME St QUINTIN INTRODUCTION Transcripts of the memorial stones in the church and churchyard of St. Mary’s Church, Frome St. Quintin were first made in 1986 by members of the Frome Valley History Society, led by Wendy Wright of Holywell House, Holywell.. The work was revised in 2009 by Graham and Jennifer Browne of Frome Farm House, Frome St. Quintin. The transcripts have been made to the best of our ability, bearing in mind the effects of weathering over sometimes quite a long period of time, and we believe them to be a true record of the material at the time of reading. In reading the following transcripts, the slashes represent the end of the line on the tombstone or memorial to guide the readers in finding the actual words for themselves. Where there is doubt about the actual wording due to erosion of the materials, either question marks or dashes will be found. The numbers on the plan reflect those of the typescript records. For further details of the men whose names appear on the two war memorials in the church, refer to the ‘Book of Remembrance’. INDEX NAME PAGE NAME PAGE ABBOTT DANIELLS Charles 5 Eliza 5 BAKER William Lovelace 5 Ann 7 DAY Benjamin 7 Francis Harry 2 George 7 DOWELL Hannah 7 F. (Cpl) 8 Jemina 7 EDWARDS John 7 Frances 1 Joseph 7 John 1 Margaret 7 Mary 1 BARTLETT Richard 1 Jane 2 Andrew W. I. 6 Mary 2 FARR BISHOP Harling and John 5 Elizabeth 1 GILES- PULLER William 1 Francis 1 BRIDGE 1, 8 Marjorie Frances Ann 7 HALL Elizabeth 7 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Dorset Giant 2019 Draft R.D
    Dorset Giant 2019 main event final Route Description v. 2.0 LDWA – Dorset Giant Challenge Event 13-14 April 2019 ROUTE DESCRIPTION Emergency Number 07561 095751 AH Ahead BL Bear left BR Bear right BW Bridleway CB Compass CP Checkpoint CVT Cerne Valley E East bearing Trail FB Field boundary FP Footpath GR Grid reference JT Jubilee Trail KG Kissing gate km kilometres L Left LH Left-hand LHS Left-hand side LMG Large metal LWG Large m metres (yours) gate wooden gate N North R Right RD Road RH Right-hand RHS Right-hand S South SDR South Dorset SLOT same line of side (yours) Ridgeway travel SMG Small metal SP Signpost ST Stile SWCP South West gate Coast Path SWG Small T-jct. T-junction TK Track wooden gate TL Turn Left TR Turn Right W West WM Waymark WPBC Weymouth WR Wessex WVW Wey Valley X Cross / across & Portland Borough Ridgeway Walk Council NB FB stands for field boundary, not footbridge. Section 1. Wey Valley School to Abbotsbury 16.3 km (10.1 miles) Height ascent – 1018ft 1.1 Exit the school with flagpole ahead, TR then immediately TL over crossing (with bollards on LHS) and AH on pavement to main RD. TR then immediately TL to X pelican crossing (CARE). AH to cross over junction with Nottington Lane and AH on pavement and in 730m TL down Mill Street (leading to Watery Lane) with church on RHS. 1.2 AH under wooden structure to TR on RD. AH for 200m to TL on FP just before railway bridge (GR SY 666 836).
    [Show full text]
  • The Essex Birdwatching Society Newsletter the Natural Home of Bird Recording and Birdwatching in Essex Since 1949 October 2020 Issue 45
    The Essex Birdwatching Society Newsletter The Natural Home of Bird Recording and Birdwatching in Essex since 1949 October 2020 Issue 45 Dear Essex Birders With chillier mornings and cooler days, we are very much in autumn now and many of our summer migrants will be replaced by autumn and winter migrants in the coming weeks. We were hoping to launch the Big County Birdwatch around now but with recent Covid restrictions we have had to adapt this years effort so we will now have THE BIG COUNTY GARDEN BIRDWATCH running from Friday 2nd - Monday 5th October 2020. I hope to send details of this great event in the next week or so.... watch this space! Best wishes to all. Steve IMPORTANT INFORMATION Due to the new law which came into force on Monday 14th Sept 2020 regarding the number of people (Maximum of 6) that are legally permitted to meet in a social gathering, it is with regret that all EBwS field trips planned for 2020 have had to be cancelled. Short-eared Owl by Steve Grimwade Registered Charity No. 1142734 www.ebws.org.uk Essex Ornithological Summary August 2020 by Howard Vaughan RSPB Rainham Marshes August was fairly slow going with few passage waders using the reserve as it was still very dry till later in the month. However, there were Green and Common Sandpipers to see and a Wood Sandpiper showed well on the 15th. Down on the river there were still Avocets and a few Black-tailed Godwits and a single Bar-tailed on the 1st. The immature Spoonbill was seen all month and a Cattle Egret arrived on the 7th and briefly became five on the 19th.
    [Show full text]
  • South Essex Outline Water Cycle Study Technical Report
    South Essex Outline Water Cycle Study Technical Report Final September 2011 Prepared for South Essex: Outline Water Cycle Study Revision Schedule South Essex Water Cycle Study September 2011 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 April 2011 D132233: S. Clare Postlethwaite Carl Pelling Carl Pelling Essex Outline Senior Consultant Principal Consultant Principal Consultant WCS – First Draft_v1 02 August 2011 Final Draft Clare Postlethwaite Rob Sweet Carl Pelling Senior Consultant Senior Consultant Principal Consultant 03 September Final Clare Postlethwaite Rob Sweet Jon Robinson 2011 Senior Consultant Senior Consultant Technical Director URS/Scott Wilson Scott House Alençon Link Basingstoke RG21 7PP Tel 01256 310200 Fax 01256 310201 www.urs-scottwilson.com South Essex Water Cycle Study Limitations URS Scott Wilson Ltd (“URS Scott Wilson”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of Basildon Borough Council, Castle Point Borough Council and Rochford District Council (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by URS Scott Wilson. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client or relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of URS Scott Wilson. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by URS Scott Wilson has not been independently verified by URS Scott Wilson, unless otherwise stated in the Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Broads (2006) IDB Water Level Management Plans: Summary
    Broads (2006) IDB Water Level Management Plans: Summary WLMP Date reviewed Agreed (Lou WLMP Title (with Author Board Designated Site Designation Mayer/Clive English Doarks) Nature) SSSI, SAC, SPA, Calthorpe Broad RAMSAR, Heidi Brograve 2001 2005 Broads IDB NNR Mahon SSSI, SAC, Upper Thurne Broads SPA, & Marshes RAMSAR, SSSI, SAC, Mike Upper Thurne Broads Catfield 2001 2005 Broads IDB SPA, Harding & Marshes RAMSAR, SSSI, SAC, Mike Chapelfield 2001 2005 Broads IDB Ant Broads & Marshes SPA, Harding RAMSAR, SSSI, SAC, Halvergate Marshes , SPA, RAMSAR, Heidi SSSI, SAC, Mahon / Halvergate 2000 2005 Broads IDB Damgate Marshes SPA, Sandie RAMSAR, Tolhurst SSSI, SAC, Decoy Carr , SPA, RAMSAR, SSSI, SAC, Burgh Common SPA, Muckfleet Marshes RAMSAR, Hemsby and John 2000 2005 Broads IDB SSSI, SAC, Muckfleet Harpley Hall Farm Fen SPA, RAMSAR Trinity Broads SSSI, SAC SSSI, SAC, Priory Meadows , SPA, Heidi RAMSAR, Hickling 2001 2005 Broads IDB Mahon SSSI, SAC, Upper Thurne Broads SPA, & Marshes RAMSAR, SSSI, SAC, John Horning 1998 2005 Broads IDB Alderfen Broad SPA, Harpley RAMSAR, SSSI, SAC, John Ludham – Potter SPA, Horsefen 1999 2005 Broads IDB Harpley Heigham Marshes RAMSAR, NNR SSSI, SAC, Upper Thurne Broads SPA, John & Marshes Horsey 2000 2005 Broads IDB RAMSAR,s Harpley Winterton To Horsey SSSI, SAC Dunes SSSI, SAC, Ludham Bridge John 1999 2005 Broads IDB Ant Broads & Marshes SPA, East Harpley RAMSAR, SSSI, SAC, John Upper Thurne Broads Martham 2002 2005 Broads IDB SPA, Harpley & Marshes RAMSAR, SSSI, SAC, John Ludham – Potter SPA, Potter Heigham
    [Show full text]
  • Parish/Town Area Vacant Seats Base Expenses Expenditure Electorate
    Parish/Town Area Vacant Seats Base Expenses Expenditure Electorate Total Expenditure Grand Total per Elector per Elector Abbotsbury 4 740 £0.06 346 £20.76 £760.76 Affpuddle and Turnerspuddle 9 740 £0.06 379 £22.74 £762.74 Alderholt 9 740 £0.06 2523 £151.38 £891.38 Allington 7 740 £0.06 693 £41.58 £781.58 Alton Pancras 2 740 £0.06 132 £7.92 £747.92 Anderson 1 740 £0.06 75 £4.50 £744.50 Arne 8 740 £0.06 1098 £65.88 £805.88 Ashmore 7 740 £0.06 159 £9.54 £749.54 Athelhampton 2 740 £0.06 29 £1.74 £741.74 Batcombe 2 740 £0.06 83 £4.98 £744.98 Beaminster 11 740 £0.06 2589 £155.34 £895.34 Beer Hackett 3 740 £0.06 81 £4.86 £744.86 Bere Regis 11 740 £0.06 1346 £80.76 £820.76 Bettiscombe 2 740 £0.06 50 £3.00 £743.00 Bincombe 3 740 £0.06 78 £4.68 £744.68 Bishop`s Caundle 7 740 £0.06 329 £19.74 £759.74 Blandford Badbury Heights 1 740 £0.06 906 £54.36 £794.36 Blandford Central 6 740 £0.06 3220 £193.20 £933.20 Blandford Hilltop 2 740 £0.06 731 £43.86 £783.86 Blandford Langton St Leonards 4 740 £0.06 1604 £96.24 £836.24 Blandford Old Town 3 740 £0.06 1596 £95.76 £835.76 Blandford St Mary 7 740 £0.06 1152 £69.12 £809.12 Bothenhampton - Bothenhampton 6 740 £0.06 1299 £77.94 £817.94 Bothenhampton - Walditch 3 740 £0.06 534 £32.04 £772.04 Bourton 9 740 £0.06 707 £42.42 £782.42 Bradford Abbas 7 740 £0.06 765 £45.90 £785.90 Bradford Peverell 7 740 £0.06 323 £19.38 £759.38 Bradpole - Bradpole Village 9 740 £0.06 1712 £102.72 £842.72 Bradpole - Claremont 1 740 £0.06 243 £14.58 £754.58 Bridport North 9 740 £0.06 3541 £212.46 £952.46 Bridport South 9 740 £0.06
    [Show full text]