DOCSLIB.ORG

The New Zealand Paradox Adjusting to the Change in Balance of Power in the Asia Pacifi C Over the Next 20 Years

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The New Zealand Paradox Adjusting to the Change in Balance of Power in the Asia Pacifi C Over the Next 20 Years MAY 2014 A Report of the CSIS Pacific Partners Initiative and the Sumitro Chair for Southeast Asia Studies AUTHOR Wayne Mapp 1616 Rhode Island Avenue NW | Washington, DC 20036 t. 202.887.0200 | f. 202.775.3199 | www.csis.org ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD The Lanham • Boulder • New York • Toronto • Plymouth, UK 4501 Forbes Boulevard, Lanham, MD 20706 t. 800.462.6420 | f. 301.429.5749 | www.rowman.com New Zealand Cover photo: Photo by Pichugin Dmitry, Shutterstock.com. ISBN 978-1-4422-2841-2 Paradox Ë|xHSLEOCy228412zv*:+:!:+:! Adjusting to the Change in Balance of Power in the Asia Pacific over the Next 20 Years Blank The New Zealand Paradox Adjusting to the Change in Balance of Power in the Asia Pacifi c over the Next 20 Years AUTHOR Wayne Mapp A Report of the CSIS Pacifi c Partners Initiative and the Sumitro Chair for Southeast Asia Studies May 2014 ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD Lanham • Boulder • New York • Toronto • Plymouth, UK About CSIS For over 50 years, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has worked to develop solutions to the world’s greatest policy challenges. Today, CSIS scholars are providing strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart a course toward a better world. CSIS is a nonprofi t or ga ni za tion headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Center’s 220 full-time staff and large network of affi liated scholars conduct research and analysis and develop policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded at the height of the Cold War by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke, CSIS was dedicated to fi nding ways to sustain American prominence and prosperity as a force for good in the world. Since 1962, CSIS has become one of the world’s preeminent international institutions focused on defense and security; regional stability; and transnational challenges ranging from energy and climate to global health and economic integration. Former U.S. senator Sam Nunn has chaired the CSIS Board of Trustees since 1999. Former deputy secretary of defense John J. Hamre became the Center’s president and chief executive offi cer in 2000. CSIS does not take specifi c policy positions; accordingly, all views expressed herein should be understood to be solely those of the author(s). © 2014 by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. All rights reserved. ISBN: 978- 1- 4422- 2841- 2 (pb); 978-1- 4422- 2842- 9 (eBook) Center for Strategic & International Studies Rowman & Littlefi eld 1616 Rhode Island Avenue, NW 4501 Forbes Boulevard Washington, DC 20036 Lanham, MD 20706 202- 887- 0200 | www.csis.org 301- 459- 3366 | www .rowman .com Contents Ac know ledg ments v Abbreviations and Acronyms vi 1. Introduction: The Essence of the Dilemma 1 2. New Zealand and the Asia Pacifi c 5 Securing the Nation 5 The ANZUS Rift 6 Reengagement with the United States 8 The Australian Dimension 13 The Chinese Opportunity 17 Achieving the Balance 19 3. The Pacifi c Pivot 21 The Security Dimension 23 The Economic Dimension 25 Infl uencing the Pacifi c Pivot 26 4. Securing the Peace 27 The Security Architecture 27 An Emerging Asia- Pacifi c Dialogue 30 The Nuclear Factor 32 Military Power in the Asia Pacifi c 35 Why the Military Balance Matters 56 5. Including China 58 Dangers and Opportunities 58 China’s Key Interests 62 Stabilizing the Littorals 63 An Inclusive Approach 66 6. The New Zealand Opportunity 68 The South Pacifi c Opportunity 69 Building an Asia-Paci fi c Security Dialogue 72 Opportunities for the Future 73 | III 7. The Next 20 Years 79 Demo cratic Legitimacy 79 The Economic Opportunity 81 The Security Dilemma 82 About the Author 85 IV | WAYNE MAPP A c k n o w l e d g m e n t s The author is deeply grateful to those at CSIS who assisted with this report’s publication. I would like to thank Ernest Bower, codirector of the CSIS Pacifi c Partners Initiative and Sumitro Chair for Southeast Asia Studies; Gregory Poling, fellow with the Pacifi c Partners Initiative and the Sumitro Chair; and Elke Larsen, research assistant and program coordi- nator with the Pacifi c Partners Initiative and the Sumitro Chair, for their support and assistance. I would also like to thank John McKinnon, former New Zealand secretary of defense and current executive director of the Asia New Zealand Foundation, and John Allen, New Zealand’s chief executive and secretary of foreign affairs and trade, for their advice and input. | V Abbreviations and Acronyms ADIZ air defense identifi cation zone ADMM+ ASEAN Defense Ministers’ Meeting Plus ANZAC Australian and New Zealand Army Corps ANZUS Australia, New Zealand, United States Security Treaty APEC Asia- Pacifi c Economic Cooperation ASEAN Association of Southeast Asian Nations AWACS airborne warning and control system C4ISR command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance CTBT Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty EAS East Asia Summit EEZ exclusive economic zone FPDA Five Power Defense Arrangement GDP gross domestic product HADR humanitarian assistance and disaster relief LDP Liberal Demo cratic Party MFAT Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade NATO North Atlantic Treaty Or ga ni za tion NZSAS New Zealand Special Air Service NZ New Zealand NZTE New Zealand Trade and Enterprise OSD Offi ce of the Secretary of Defense PAC- 3 Patriot Advanced Capability-3 missile PIF Pacifi c Islands Forum PLA People’s Liberation Army PRC People’s Republic of China RCEP Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership RIMPAC Rim of the Pacifi c Exercise TPP Trans- Pacifi c Partnership UN United Nations V/STOL vertical and/or short takeoff and landing VI | Introduction: Th e Essence of the 1 Dilemma ver the next two de cades New Zealand faces a paradox. The country’s security Oand economic relationships are being pulled in opposite directions. Over the last 20 years, these relationships have become increasingly divergent. The People’s Republic of China (PRC)is rapidly becoming New Zealand’s most important economic partner behind Australia. At the same time New Zealand is forging a new security relationship with the United States. This divergent tendency is likely to intensify over the next two de cades. At fi rst blush this paradox would seem to be unsustainable, especially when viewed from the perspective of 2030. By that time, China is almost certain to be the world’s largest economy, and will be New Zealand’s most important economic partner in trade, invest- ment, and ser vices. China will also expect to have infl uence in global affairs that will refl ect its economic status. Understandably New Zealand’s strategic partner, the United States, will not view this change in world affairs with equanimity. It will seek to counter this development by reinforcing U.S. engagement with the Asia-Paci fi c nations with reference to its more attrac- tive liberal demo cratic values. The United States will be able to back up these qualities with the scale of its economy, which will still be comparable to that of China and which will have deep international connections, including with New Zealand. The United States will also have military forces with global reach, which for the next 20 years at least will be unrivaled. But it will be challenged by the increased tempo of the arms buildup in East Asia. The most important question that New Zealand will face over the next 20 years is whether the continuation of this paradox is a viable proposition for the country. Is it pos- sible to accept that there simply will not be an alignment between New Zealand’s security and economic relationships, and that this can be accommodated without causing signifi - cant diffi culty? Or does it mean that New Zealand is going to have to make a fundamental shift in those relationships? New Zealand’s key economic relationships are becoming more focused on Asia, with China being increasingly predominant. This trend will continue, and is almost certain to | 1 intensify over the next 20 years. Already China has become New Zealand’s largest trading partner for both imports and exports.1 Trade is not merely a fi nancial transaction. It involves substantial human interaction. Business people work together. Travel increases. Offi ces are established. Nations become interlinked, and increasingly take into account each other’s needs and expectations. This has been the story of the relationship between China and New Zealand over the last 20 years. Over the coming years this pro cess will deepen and strengthen. In contrast, New Zealand’s security focus remains on its traditional allies and partners, most notably Australia and the United States. These relationships are built on history, sacrifi ce, and shared values. Such things do not readily change. In par tic u lar, nations do not base their most important security relationships on the changing fortunes of interna- tional trade patterns, unless there are other compelling factors. Deep security relation- ships are unlikely to be substituted for partnerships that do not rest on long-standing values that are common to both parties. Right now this paradox is readily accommodated, largely because China and the United States are not yet in sharp competition. Whether this can continue will depend on how the power relationships evolve within the Asia- Pacifi c region, and on New Zealand’s skill in managing the impact of these changes. New Zealand is not the only nation that will have to deal with this paradox; so will many others, most notably Australia. In fact, for Australia the situation is even starker. China is already Australia’s main trading partner. Unlike New Zealand, Australia has a formal security alliance with the United States through the Australia, New Zealand, United States Security Treaty (ANZUS).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS New Zealand Selected Political and Economic Issues
    DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS New Zealand Selected political and economic issues Author: Roberto BENDINI Abstract For many years New Zealand appeared an essentially European country located in the midst of the Pacific Ocean, some 15 000 kilometres from Europe. Yet in recent decades the country has welcomed significant numbers of Asian immigrants and integrated its economy with the emerging economies of its Asian neighbours, and notably China. Recent elections secured another three-year mandate for a coalition of centre-right parties. Led by Prime Minister John Key, the government is expected to further promote investment and adopt business-friendly measures in the upcoming term. With an active foreign policy – especially in the Asia-Pacific region – the country has often participated in UN-led or international peacekeeping missions. New Zealand's upright reputation earned the country a non-permanent seat in the UN Security Council for the period 2015- 2017. Relations with the EU are good despite declining bilateral trade and the country's growing focus on the Asia Pacific region. In 2014 the EU and New Zealand successfully concluded negotiations for a Framework Agreement. Free trade agreement talks may be opened later this year. FOR EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT INTERNAL USE ONLY DG EXPO/B/PolDep/Note/2015_90 February 2015 EN Policy Department, Directorate-General for External Policies This paper is an initiative of the Policy Department, DG EXPO AUTHORS: Roberto BENDINI Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union Policy Department SQM 03 Y 85 Rue Wiertz 60 BE-1047 Brussels Editorial Assistant: Jakub PRZETACZNIK CONTACT: Feedback of all kinds is welcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 34 June 2009
    Issue 34 July 2009 AgScience Inside President's au revoir Primary Growth Partnership Passion for wool The New Zealand Institute of Agricultural & Horticultural Science Inc John Lancashire AgHort talking President Comment Au Revoir But Not Goodbye It is traditional to dwell on successes CROWN RESEARCH system with an advisory committee when leaving a position and as this is my INSTITUTES including working scientists. The MoRST last AgHort Talking as President I will Your Institute (and others ) has campaigned priorities for the 2009/2010 include follow this route, but will not forget the for many years for a serious look at the improving the science system so that failures. way the CRIs have developed. The lack of scientists can "spend more time at the Fortuitously there has been some good a proper oversight of their public good bench" (and presumably in the paddock). news for the primary sector and science in role, which is actually enshrined in the recent weeks. CRI Act, resulting in an over-emphasis on THE FUTURE commercial activities, has driven the There are still disappointments, of course. BUDGET Institutes to short-term work and The lack of some sort of inflation proofing Despite some carping from traditional consultancies in an attempt to pay the for long-term funded research is ridiculous sources the budget represents government government a dividend. The recent as over a 12 year period, say, much of the confidence in the primary sector with government decision to lift the required funding will have disappeared. The some real, if small, extra allocations in dividend to 9% does not suggest that a dropping of tax credits for R&D does not tough economic times.
    [Show full text]
  • Nzdf and Ministry of Defence
    Cabinet CAB Min (10) 39/8 Copy No:";).l Minute of Decision This document contains information for the New Zealand Cabinet. It must be treated in confidence and handled in accordance with any security classification, or other endorsement. The information can only be released, including under the Official Information Act 1982, by persons with the appropriate authority. Defence White Paper: Final Draft ~r?~ ~ Portfolio: Defence ~~ ~ • 'I. On 1 November 2010, following reference from the Cabinet Exte hRelatlOns and: efertce Committee (ERD), Cabinet: 1 noted that on 26 October201O, ERD noted: ~~/J~ 1.1 the contents of the draft Defence Whi e ape 'QO 10, :ache 0 the paper under ERD (10) 48; A. 1.2 that the draft Defence White Defence White Paper 201 1.3 2 endorsed ~V{~l¢ ..",nPrn Ol0, attached to the paper under CAB (10) 581. ~ kdatUfl- Secretary of tlt~abiItet Reference: CAB (10) 581 8 Distribution: (see over) t:CMS i[, ', , 1 Udtr.? .................., i F'oider r\l{] , , , , i I i ~'~~~.::'!_:..:~ec) ,_ To '•. :.:,~~,,~:::.::.:_~.~~.~:.:.:~.:.:..:.:..:.;,::.~:~~ 1'7'1'100,,1 Cabinet External ERD Min (10) 11/1 Relations and Defence Copy No: aci Committee Minute of Decision This document contains information for the New Zealand Cabinet. It must be treated in confidence and handled in accordance with any security classification, or other endorsement. The information can only be released, including under the Official Information Act 1982, by persons with the appropriate authority. Defence White Paper: Final Draft Portfolio: Defence On 26 October
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth Responsibility and Cold War Solidarity Australia in Asia, 1944–74
    COMMONWEALTH RESPONSIBILITY AND COLD WAR SOLIDARITY AUSTRALIA IN ASIA, 1944–74 COMMONWEALTH RESPONSIBILITY AND COLD WAR SOLIDARITY AUSTRALIA IN ASIA, 1944–74 DAN HALVORSON Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] Available to download for free at press.anu.edu.au ISBN (print): 9781760463236 ISBN (online): 9781760463243 WorldCat (print): 1126581099 WorldCat (online): 1126581312 DOI: 10.22459/CRCWS.2019 This title is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The full licence terms are available at creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode Cover design and layout by ANU Press. Cover image courtesy of the National Archives of Australia. NAA: A1775, RGM107. This edition © 2019 ANU Press Contents Acknowledgements . vii Abbreviations . ix 1 . Introduction . 1 2 . Region and regionalism in the immediate postwar period . 13 3 . Decolonisation and Commonwealth responsibility . 43 4 . The Cold War and non‑communist solidarity in East Asia . 71 5 . The winds of change . 103 6 . Outside the margins . 131 7 . Conclusion . 159 References . 167 Index . 185 Acknowledgements I would like to thank Cathy Moloney, Anja Mustafic, Jennifer Roberts and Lucy West for research assistance on this project. Thanks also to my colleagues Michael Heazle, Andrew O’Neil, Wes Widmaier, Ian Hall, Jason Sharman and Lucy West for reading and commenting on parts of the work. Additionally, I would like to express my gratitude to participants at the 15th International Conference of Australian Studies in China, held at Peking University, Beijing, 8–10 July 2016, and participants at the Seventh Annual Australia–Japan Dialogue, hosted by the Griffith Asia Institute and Japan Institute for International Affairs, held in Brisbane, 9 November 2017, for useful comments on earlier papers contributing to the manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives on a Pacific Partnership
    The United States and New Zealand: Perspectives on a Pacific Partnership Prepared by Bruce Robert Vaughn, PhD With funding from the sponsors of the Ian Axford (New Zealand) Fellowships in Public Policy August 2012 Established by the Level 8, 120 Featherston Street Telephone +64 4 472 2065 New Zealand government in 1995 PO Box 3465 Facsimile +64 4 499 5364 to facilitate public policy dialogue Wellington 6140 E-mail [email protected] between New Zealand and New Zealand www.fulbright.org.nz the United States of America © Bruce Robert Vaughn 2012 Published by Fulbright New Zealand, August 2012 The opinions and views expressed in this paper are the personal views of the author and do not represent in whole or part the opinions of Fulbright New Zealand or any New Zealand government agency. Nor do they represent the views of the Congressional Research Service or any US government agency. ISBN 978-1-877502-38-5 (print) ISBN 978-1-877502-39-2 (PDF) Ian Axford (New Zealand) Fellowships in Public Policy Established by the New Zealand Government in 1995 to reinforce links between New Zealand and the US, Ian Axford (New Zealand) Fellowships in Public Policy provide the opportunity for outstanding mid-career professionals from the United States of America to gain firsthand knowledge of public policy in New Zealand, including economic, social and political reforms and management of the government sector. The Ian Axford (New Zealand) Fellowships in Public Policy were named in honour of Sir Ian Axford, an eminent New Zealand astrophysicist and space scientist who served as patron of the fellowship programme until his death in March 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Guam: U.S. Defense Deployments
    Guam: U.S. Defense Deployments Shirley A. Kan Specialist in Asian Security Affairs May 6, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS22570 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Guam: U.S. Defense Deployments Summary Since 2000, the U.S. military has been building up forward-deployed forces on the westernmost U.S. territory of Guam to increase U.S. presence, deterrence, and power projection for possible responses to crises and disasters, counterterrorism, and contingencies in support of South Korea, Japan, the Philippines, Taiwan, or elsewhere in Asia. Since 2006, three joint exercises based at Guam called “Valiant Shield” have boosted U.S. military readiness in the Asian-Pacific region. The defense buildup on Guam has been moderate. China still has concerns about Guam’s buildup, suspecting it to be directed against China. There has been concern that China and North Korea could target Guam with missiles. Still, Guam’s role increased in engaging China’s military. In 2006, the United States and Japan agreed on a “Roadmap” to strengthen their alliance, including a buildup on Guam to cost $10.3 billion, with Japan contributing 60%. Primary goals were to start the related construction on Guam by 2010 and to complete relocation of about 8,000 marines from Okinawa to Guam by 2014. In Tokyo on February 17, 2009, the Secretary of State signed the bilateral “Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Japan Concerning the Implementation of the Relocation of the III Marine Expeditionary Force Personnel and Their Dependents From Okinawa to Guam” that reaffirmed the “Roadmap” of May 1, 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert M. Gates, Ph.D
    Robert M. Gates, Ph.D. Secretary of Defense (2006-2011); Author, New York Times Best Seller, DUTY: Memoirs of a Cuyahoga Community College Secretary at War and A Passion for Leadership Cuyahoga Community College (Tri-C®) is a regional leader in public education, academic Robert Gates served as the 22nd secretary of defense (2006-2011) and is the only secretary innovation and cultural enrichment. For more than 55 years, the College has tailored its of defense in U.S. history to be asked to remain in that office by a newly elected President. curriculum to meet changing workforce demands, helping individuals qualify for work in the President Barack Obama is the eighth president Gates has served. He previously served under job market’s most sought-after fields. With six Centers of Excellence and more than 140 career, President George W. Bush. technical and liberal arts programs, Tri-C empowers students by providing clear pathways On Gates’ last day in office, President Barack Obama awarded him the Presidential Medal of to degree and certificate completion. Tri-C has helped more than 900,000 students toward Freedom, America’s highest civilian honor. meaningful careers or advanced education, and more than 85 percent of Tri-C graduates Before becoming secretary of defense in 2006, Gates was the president of Texas A&M University, continue to live in the area, providing a pool of skilled workers that includes nurses, teachers, the nation’s seventh largest university. Prior to assuming the Texas A&M presidency on August medical technicians, firefighters, engineers, police officers and business professionals.
    [Show full text]
  • Writings Ignited a Powder Keg Key Events Alumni Speakers Staff, Students and the Public Can Hear the Distinguished Alumni Awardees Discussing Their Life and Work
    Fortnightly newsletter for University staff | Volume 39 | Issue 3 | 27 February 2009 Writings ignited a powder keg Key events Alumni speakers Staff, students and the public can hear the Distinguished Alumni Awardees discussing their life and work. A Distinguished Alumni Speaker Day is being held on Saturday 14 March, the day after the gala dinner to honour them.There are five concurrent talks between mid-morning and early afternoon in the Owen G Glenn Building and the Fale Pasifika: Children’s author Lynley Dodd: “Going to the dogs” (10.30-11.30am); the Samoan Prime Minister, the Rt Hon Tuilaepa Malielegaoi: “Survival in the turbulent sea of change of island politics in the calm and peace of the Pacific Ocean” (10.30-11.30am); businessman Richard Chandler (in conversation with the Rt Hon Mike Moore): “Building prosperity for tomorrow’s world” (12noon- 1.15pm); playwright and film-maker Toa Fraser: “Animal tangles: That’s the carnal and the Allen Rodrigo and Brian Boyd at the Fale Pasifika during the symposium. heavenly right there” (12noon-1pm); the Rt Hon A free public all-day symposium on the lasting reverberations can still be felt today. His legacy has Sir Douglas Graham: “Maori representation in legacy of Charles Darwin attracted a crowd that extended beyond biology, beyond natural science Parliament” (12noon-1pm). filled the large Fisher and Paykel Auditorium in and into the humanities and social sciences.” RSVP at www.auckland.ac.nz/speaker-day or the Owen G Glenn Building, and at times This breadth of Darwin’s influence was borne email [email protected] overflowed into a second venue.
    [Show full text]
  • How Can Realism Be Utilised in an Understanding of the United States/New Zealand Relationship Over Nuclear Policy?
    How can realism be utilised in an understanding of the United States/New Zealand relationship over nuclear policy? By Angela Fitzsimons A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Masters of International Relations (MIR) degree School of History, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations Victoria University of Wellington 2013 Abstract This thesis examines the decision making process of the United States and New Zealand on the nuclear policy issue through the lens of realism and analyses the effect of realism on the ANZUS alliance. Broader questions associated with alliances, national interest, changing priorities and limits on the use of power are also treated. A single case study of the United States/ New Zealand security relationship as embodied in the ANZUS treaty will be used to evaluate the utility of realism in understanding the decision making process that led to the declaration by the United States that the treaty was in abeyance. Five significant findings emerged: firstly both New Zealand and the United States used realism in the decision making process based on national interest, Secondly; diverging national interests over the nuclear issue made the ANZUS treaty untenable. Thirdly, ethical and cultural aspects of the relationship between the two states limited the application of classical realism to understanding the bond. Fourthly, normative theory accommodates realist theory on the behaviour of states in the international environment. Finally, continued engagement between the United
    [Show full text]
  • REAGAN NATIONAL DEFENSE FORUM Building Peace Through Strength for American Security
    REAGAN NATIONAL DEFENSE FORUM Building Peace Through Strength for American Security SATURDAY, NOVEMBER , RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY SIMI VALLEY, CALIFORNIA Mission Statement The Reagan National Defense Forum (RNDF) brings together leaders and key stakeholders in the defense community, including members of Congress, civilian officials and military leaders from the Defense Department and industry, to address the health of our national defense and stimulate a discussion that promotes policies that strengthen the US military in the future. In an era of fiscal austerity where the threats to our national security are increasing in number and complexity, the RNDF will allow senior leaders from the defense community to come together with viewpoints on how best to deal with it. Though President Reagan left office many years ago, the United States military continues to benefit from his commitment and vision for a strong military. Recognizing that today’s decisions will affect the military’s capabilities for years to come, the RNDF will charge leaders from current and past Administrations and Congress to look beyond the immediate issues facing the military and explore how we can build a strong national defense for the future. Honorary Steering Committee The Honorable Howard P. “Buck” McKeon, Chairman The Honorable Sam Nunn (Retired) The Honorable Robert Gates The Honorable George Shultz The Honorable Duncan L. Hunter (Retired) (Reagan Foundation Trustee) The Honorable James M. Inhofe The Honorable Adam Smith The Honorable Ann McLaughlin Korologos The Honorable John Warner (Retired) (Reagan Foundation Trustee) The Honorable Pete Wilson The Honorable Carl Levin (Reagan Foundation Trustee) Agenda The 2014 RNDF daylong conference includes a morning welcome reception, simultaneous morning and afternoon panel sessions, keynote luncheon, closing session with a special keynote address and museum tours of the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rarity of Realpolitik the Rarity of Brian Rathbun Realpolitik What Bismarck’S Rationality Reveals About International Politics
    The Rarity of Realpolitik The Rarity of Brian Rathbun Realpolitik What Bismarck’s Rationality Reveals about International Politics Realpolitik, the pur- suit of vital state interests in a dangerous world that constrains state behavior, is at the heart of realist theory. All realists assume that states act in such a man- ner or, at the very least, are highly incentivized to do so by the structure of the international system, whether it be its anarchic character or the presence of other similarly self-interested states. Often overlooked, however, is that Real- politik has important psychological preconditions. Classical realists note that Realpolitik presupposes rational thinking, which, they argue, should not be taken for granted. Some leaders act more rationally than others because they think more rationally than others. Hans Morgenthau, perhaps the most fa- mous classical realist of all, goes as far as to suggest that rationality, and there- fore Realpolitik, is the exception rather than the rule.1 Realpolitik is rare, which is why classical realists devote as much attention to prescribing as they do to explaining foreign policy. Is Realpolitik actually rare empirically, and if so, what are the implications for scholars’ and practitioners’ understanding of foreign policy and the nature of international relations more generally? The necessity of a particular psy- chology for Realpolitik, one based on rational thinking, has never been ex- plicitly tested. Realists such as Morgenthau typically rely on sweeping and unveriªed assumptions, and the relative frequency of realist leaders is difªcult to establish empirically. In this article, I show that research in cognitive psychology provides a strong foundation for the classical realist claim that rationality is a demanding cogni- tive standard that few leaders meet.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kiwi That Roared: Nuclear-Free New Zealand in a Nuclear-Armed World
    Wade Huntley THE KIWI THAT ROARED: NUCLEAR-FREE NEW ZEALAND IN A NUCLEAR-ARMED WORLD by Wade Huntley Dr. Wade Huntley is Program Director for Asia/Pacific Security at the Nautilus Institute for Security and Sustainable Development in Berkeley, California, where he produces the Northeast Asian Peace and Security Network’s Daily Report (www.nautilus.org). He has an article in the March 1996 issue of International Studies Quarterly and is working on a book based on his doctoral dissertation, “The Citizen and the Sword: Security and Democracy in the Liberal State.” The University of California’s Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation provided support for research on this article. n July 14, 1984, New policy was widely criticized as a evance to larger democracies, is that Zealand elected its fourth frivolous moral exercise indulging a mass public is ill-suited to make O Labour government and vocal anti-nuclear activists and play- wise and prudent decisions regard- thus brought into effect its policy de- ing on an impassioned and unin- ing state security. Recent research claring the country “nuclear free,” formed public, while needlessly on this subject indicates that popu- which included prohibiting port entry jeopardizing the country’s national lar opinion is not as volatile and in- by any ships either under nuclear interests and sacrificing its ANZUS coherent, nor its effects on security power or carrying nuclear weapons.1 alliance relationship with the United policy as pernicious, as once The government’s commitment to States.3 This judgment is rooted in thought. However, many of these this policy reached a moment of truth two converging claims.
    [Show full text]