21 Claremont Square Planning and Heritage Impact Assessment Mr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

21 Claremont Square Planning and Heritage Impact Assessment Mr 21 Claremont Square Planning and Heritage Impact Assessment Mr and Mrs Brentan 21 January 2016 14626/IR/HM/KMo Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners 14 Regent's Wharf All Saints Street London N1 9RL nlpplanning.com This document is formatted for double sided printing. © Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners Ltd 2015. Trading as Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners. All Rights Reserved. Registered Office: 14 Regent's Wharf All Saints Street London N1 9RL All plans within this document produced by NLP are based upon Ordnance Survey mapping with the permission of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. © Crown Copyright reserved. Licence number AL50684A 21 Claremont Square : Planning and Heritage Impact Assessment Contents 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Summary of Pre-App 2 External Alterations ........................................................................................... 2 Internal Alterations............................................................................................. 2 Amenity ............................................................................................................. 2 3.0 Statutory and Policy Context 3 The Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 .................. 3 National Planning Policy (NPPF) ....................................................................... 3 Regional and Local Planning Policy .................................................................. 4 Other Material Considerations ........................................................................... 5 4.0 Significance of Heritage Assets 8 Existing Description of Site and Surrounds ....................................................... 8 Site Exterior ....................................................................................................... 8 Site Interior ........................................................................................................ 9 Historic Development of Claremont Square ...................................................... 9 William Chadwell Mylne and the New River Company .................................... 15 Harley Sherlock ............................................................................................... 16 Significance ..................................................................................................... 17 5.0 Assessment of Proposed Development 19 Heritage Impacts ............................................................................................. 19 Other Material Planning Considerations .......................................................... 22 6.0 Conclusion 25 9617273v1 21 Claremont Square : Planning and Heritage Impact Assessment 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Nathaniel Lichfield and Partners (NLP) has been asked by Mr and Mrs Brentan to produce this Planning and Heritage Impact Assessment regarding alterations to their flat within 21 Claremont Square. 1.2 21 Claremont Square is grade II listed (see Appendix 1 for listing description), together with the rest of the southern terrace of Claremont Square. It is located within the New River Conservation Area, within the London Borough of Islington (LBI). It is a five storey (including basement) Georgian terrace house dating to 1821-1828. The property was subdivided in the 1970s and Mr and Mrs Brentan’s flat comprises three floors (first to third floor). The ground floor and basement accommodates a separate flat which is under the ownership of the London Borough of Islington (LBI). 1.3 A pre-application request was submitted by Pierre Mare Architects to LBI for the following: 1 an extension to an existing rear water closet (increasing height from 2 to 2.5 storeys); 2 internal alterations including installing a wood burner stove and fitted cupboards to first floor; 3 alteration of plan form at second floor; 4 and removal of existing kitchen ceiling at third floor 1.4 A pre-application meeting was held on 22 April 2015. The subsequent written officer response (15 May 2015, included at Appendix 2) indicated that all elements of the proposal were considered to be unacceptable in terms of impact on the listed building. In addition, the acceptability of the extension in terms of loss of daylight/sunlight to No. 22 appears to be questioned. 1.5 This Statement establishes the significance of 21 Claremont Square including the consistency of the rear elevations, visibility of the rear elevations and the integrity of the interior rooms. It also provides the planning policy context against which the acceptability of proposed alterations to the property is assessed. 9617273v1 P1 21 Claremont Square : Planning and Heritage Impact Assessment 2.0 Summary of Pre-App 2.1 A summary of the pre-application written advice (15 May 2015) has been provided below. External Alterations 1 Rear extension is unacceptable. It is not in accordance with Islington Urban Design Guide (IUDG) or Conservation Area Design Guidelines (CADG) advice and is harmful to the generally consistent height of the rear projections (with exception of taller element to rear of No. 18 which sits at end of terrace, but does not interrupt the consistent rhythm. This does not appear to have consent and should not be used as justification). 2 The design of the rear extension is inappropriate. If an increase in height was acceptable, which it is not, then a more traditional approach in keeping with the character and materials of the building would be more appropriate. 3 Window replacements - The replacement of whole sashes and glass is unlikely to be considered acceptable unless it can be demonstrated that the existing is not historic or beyond repair and that the replacement glass will not alter the appearance of the glazing. Internal Alterations 4 First Floor – a woodburner is unacceptable. An appropriate fireplace should be installed. 5 First Floor – the built in cupboards should not be installed over the chimney breast as this is harmful to the historic plan form of the room. Fitted furniture should not be full height, leaving a punctuating gap between the top of the furniture and the ceiling. 6 Second Floor – relocation of spine wall and doorway is unacceptable as it is harmful to the original plan form (partition either original or modern but in location of original). 7 Third Floor - The proposed removal of the ceiling to kitchen at third floor level is considered unacceptable in principle as this will result in an inappropriate floor ceiling height at this level and therefore is harmful to the historic proportions of the house. 8 Repair work to plaster must be carried out on a like-for-like basis with lime plaster. Amenity 9 Impact on upper ground floor windows of 22 Claremont Square – if the proposals are considered to be overbearing, reduce outlook or cause loss of light then the application may be refused. The BRE Guidelines should be used. P2 9617273v1 21 Claremont Square : Planning and Heritage Impact Assessment 3.0 Statutory and Policy Context 3.1 The following provides a review of legislation and national, regional and local planning policy relevant to the development. The Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 3.2 The Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 provides specific protection for buildings and areas that are of special architectural or historic interest over and above the protection provided through the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 3.3 Section 66(1) requires development affecting a listed building or its setting to have special regard to the preservation of the building or its setting or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses. 3.4 Section 72 of the Act states that with respect to any buildings or land in a Conservation Area, special attention should be paid to the desirability of preserving or enhancing the character or appearance of Conservation Areas. National Planning Policy (NPPF) 3.5 At the heart of the NPPF (2012) is a presumption in favour of sustainable development, which includes contributing to protecting our natural, built and historic environment and conserving heritage assets in a manner appropriate to their significance. 3.6 Paragraph 14 of the NPPF states that where a development plan is absent, silent or relevant policies are out of date, the policies of the NPPF take precedence. Permission should not be granted if any adverse impacts would significantly or demonstrably outweigh the benefits when assessed against the NPPF. 3.7 According to paragraph 128, when determining applications local planning authorities should require an applicant to describe the significance of any heritage assets affected, including any contribution made by their setting. The level of detail should be proportionate to the assets’ importance and no more than is sufficient to understand the potential impact of the proposal of their significance. 3.8 Under paragraph 131, local planning authorities are required to take account of the desirability of new development making a positive contribution to local character and distinctiveness. In addition, when considering the impact of a proposed development on the significance of a designated heritage asset, great weight should be given to the asset’s conservation. The more important the asset, the greater the weight should be (paragraph 132). 9617273v1 P3 21 Claremont Square : Planning and Heritage Impact Assessment 3.9 Proposed developments which cause substantial harm or total loss of significance of a designated heritage asset should be refused unless substantial public benefits resulting from
Recommended publications
  • Clerke Enwell Paroch Hial Sc Hool
    Heritage Statement and Design & Access Statement Clerkenwell Parochial School Amwell Street, Islington, ec1 Application for Planning Permission and Listed Building Consent David Gibson Architects February 2014 26 February 2014 Ref.: 0997/140226.it David Gibson Architects 35 Britannia Row London N1 8QH (fax 020 7704 6946) 020 7226 2207 Page 1 Location and Context Clerkenwell Parochial Church of England Primary School is located in the southern part of the London Borough of Islington within the New River Conservation Area. The school building and the attached former Caretaker’s House are Listed Grade II (see attached ‘list’ description – appendix A). Clerkenwell Parochial is one of the oldest extant school houses in London. If the school is to continue to run effectively and successfully, it must update itself and its surroundings, but without detracting from its charm, identity or historic character. History Clerkenwell Parochial School moved to its present site in 1828 for the education of the children in the New River Company and Lloyd Baker estates, then still under construction. The new school building, in a Tudor style and St. Mark's church, in a plain Gothic style, both by William Chadwell Mylne, the New River Company's architect, were precursors of the more vigorously eclectic revivalist styles, which were to become fashionable by the middle of the century. The Listing The school was ’Listed' in September 1972, as a ‘building of special architectural or historical interest' under Section 54 of Chapter 78 the Town and Country Planning Act 1971. The listing is at Grade II. There are now nearly 4000 Listed Buildings in Islington, of which all but a handful are Grade II, but many regard this as one of the most important because of its early date, because of its significance in the development of the historic Clerkenwell estates and because it is an unusually well-preserved pre-School Board school, retaining intact most of its original features and early adaptations - one of the few surviving in London.
    [Show full text]
  • Former Fellows Biographical Index Part
    Former Fellows of The Royal Society of Edinburgh 1783 – 2002 Biographical Index Part Two ISBN 0 902198 84 X Published July 2006 © The Royal Society of Edinburgh 22-26 George Street, Edinburgh, EH2 2PQ BIOGRAPHICAL INDEX OF FORMER FELLOWS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH 1783 – 2002 PART II K-Z C D Waterston and A Macmillan Shearer This is a print-out of the biographical index of over 4000 former Fellows of the Royal Society of Edinburgh as held on the Society’s computer system in October 2005. It lists former Fellows from the foundation of the Society in 1783 to October 2002. Most are deceased Fellows up to and including the list given in the RSE Directory 2003 (Session 2002-3) but some former Fellows who left the Society by resignation or were removed from the roll are still living. HISTORY OF THE PROJECT Information on the Fellowship has been kept by the Society in many ways – unpublished sources include Council and Committee Minutes, Card Indices, and correspondence; published sources such as Transactions, Proceedings, Year Books, Billets, Candidates Lists, etc. All have been examined by the compilers, who have found the Minutes, particularly Committee Minutes, to be of variable quality, and it is to be regretted that the Society’s holdings of published billets and candidates lists are incomplete. The late Professor Neil Campbell prepared from these sources a loose-leaf list of some 1500 Ordinary Fellows elected during the Society’s first hundred years. He listed name and forenames, title where applicable and national honours, profession or discipline, position held, some information on membership of the other societies, dates of birth, election to the Society and death or resignation from the Society and reference to a printed biography.
    [Show full text]
  • CONDON Gazeffe, MAY 24, 1864. No. 22857. C
    CONDON GAZEffE, MAY 24, 1864. said Joseph William Thrapp, who ia now~the surviving only to the claims of which they shall then have.had notice; executor of the 'said John Collins,- at the offices of his and further, that they will not be liable for any'part of such Solicitors, Messrs. Burgoynes, Millies, and Burgoyne, assets to any person of whose claim they shall not then have situate at No. 160, Oxford-street, London, on or before the had notice.—Dated this 23rd day of May, 1864. 7th day of July, 1864, at the expiration of which time the CHARLES RIVINGTON, No. 1, Fenchurch- said surviving executor will distribute the assets of the said buildings. John Collins among the parties entitled thereto, having re- WILLIAM CHADWELL MYLNE, Esquire, Deceased. gard to the claims of which the said surviving executor shall Pursuant to the Act of Parliament 22nd and 23rd Victoria, then have had notice, and will not be liable for the assets, cap. 35, intituled "An Act to further amend the Law of so distributed, to any 'person of whose debt or claim the said Property, and to relieve Trustees." surviving executor shall not then have notice.—Dated this OTICE is hereby given, that .ill persons having claims 19th day of May, 1864. N against the estate of William Ohadwell Mylne, formerly BURGOYNES, MILNES, and BURGOYNE, of the New River Head, in the parish of ClerkenweiJ, in No. 160, Oxford-street, London, Solicitors for the the county of Middlesex, and late of Am well, in the county said Joseph William Thrnpp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mylne Family [Microform] : Master Masons, Architects, Engineers, Their Professional Career, 1481-1876
    THE MYLNE FAMILY. MASTER MASONS, ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS THEIR PROFESSIONAL CAREER 1481-1876. PRINTED FOR PRIVATE CIRCULATION BY ROBERT W. MYLNE, C.E., F.R.S., F.S.A., F.G.S., F.S.A Scot PEL, INST. BRIT. ARCH LONDON 187 JOHN MYLNE, MASTER MASON ANDMASTER OF THE LODGE OF SCONE. {area 1640—45.) Jfyotn an original drawing in tliepossession of W. F. Watson, Esq., Edinburgh. C%*l*\ fA^ CONTENTS. PREFACE. " REPRINT FROM ARTICLEIN DICTIONARYOF ARCHITECTURE.^' 1876. REGISTER 07 ABMB—LTONOFFICE—SCOTLAND,1672. BEPBIKT FBOH '-' HISTOBT OF THKLODGE OF EDINBURGH," 1873. CONTRACT BT THE MASTER MASONS OF THE LODGE OF SCONE AND PERTH, 1658. APPENDIX. EXTRACTS FROM THE BURGH BOOKS OF DUNDEE, 1567—1604. CONTRACT WITH GEORGE THOMSON AND JOHN MTLNE, MASONS, TO MAKE ADDITIONS TO LORD BANNTAYNE'S HOUSE AT NEWTTLE. NEAR DUNDEE, 1589. — EXTRACTS FROM THE BURGH BOOKS OF EDINBURGH, 1616 17. CONTRACT BETWIXT JOHN MTLNE,AND LORD SCONE TO BUILD A CHURCH AT FALKLAND,1620. EXTRACTS FROM THE BURGH BOOKS OF DUNDEE AND ABERDEEN, 1622—27. EXTRACT FROM THE CHAMBEBLAIn'b ACCOUNTS OF THE EABL OF PERTH, 1629. GRANT TOJOHN MTLNEOF THE OFFICE OF PRINCIPAL MASTER MASON TO THEKING,1631. EXTRACTS FBOM THE BUBGH BOOKS OF KIBCALDT AND DUNDEE, 1643—51. GRANT TO JOHN MTLNE, TOUNGER, KING'S PRINCIPAL MASTER MASON> OF THE OFFICE OF CAPTAIN AND MASTER OF PIONEERS AND PRINCIPAL MASTER GUNNER OF ALLSCOTLAND,1646. CONTRACT WITHJOHN MTLNEAND GEORGE 2ND EABL 09 PANMUBE TO BUILDPANMURE HOUSE, ADJACENT TO THE ANCIENT MANSION AT BOWBCHIN, NEAR DUNDEE, 1666. BOTAL WARRANT CONCERNING THE FINISHING OF THE PALACE OF HOLTROOD, 21 FEBRUARY,1676.
    [Show full text]
  • Name of Document
    HERITAGE SUPPORTING STATEMENT In respect of R/O 28 AMWELL STREET ISLINGTON On behalf of TURNHOLD (ISLINGTON) LIMITED CgMs Ref: JO/DM/11841 Date: August 2010 Heritage Supporting Statement R/O 28 Amwell Street, Islington Turnhold (Islington) Limited CONTENTS PAGE NO. 1.0 INTRODUCTION 4 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 6 3.0 HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT 7 4.0 LEGISLATION AND GUIDANCE 16 5.0 THE PROPOSALS AND IMPACTS 18 6.0 CONCLUSION 21 SOURCES CONSULTED 23 Appendices Appendix 1: List descriptions and New River Conservation Area Map Figures Figure 1: Site Location Figure 2: Morgan, 1682 Figure 3: John Rocque, 1746 Figure 4: John Rocque, 1747 Figure 5: An actual survey of the New River Head near Islington, 1763 Figure 6: Richard Horward, 1799-1819 Figure 7: Greenwood, 1827 Figure 8: Ordnance Survey, 1874 Figure 9: Ordnance Survey, 1896 Figure 10: Ordnance Survey, 1938 Figure 11: Ordnance Survey, 1953 Figure 12: Ordnance Survey, 1971 Figure 13: Ordnance Survey, 1976 Plates List Plate 1: South elevation of Engine House and attached Boiler House Plate 2: South elevation of Boiler House Plate 3: South elevation of South Stores Plate 4: Remains of former Windmill CgMs Ltd © 2 JO/DM/11841 Draft Heritage Supporting Statement R/O 28 Amwell Street, Islington Turnhold (Islington) Limited Plate 5: Detail of granite setts with inlaid rails Plate 6: View into the site from the east Plate 7: North elevation of the Boiler House Plate 8: West elevation of the North Stores Plate 9: South elevation of the North Stores Plate 10: West elevation of the Engine House and attached Boiler House CgMs Ltd © 3 JO/DM/11841 Draft Heritage Supporting Statement R/O 28 Amwell Street, Islington Turnhold (Islington) Limited 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This report has been prepared by Jody M O’Reilly and Edward Kitchen of CgMs Ltd, to support applications for planning permission and listed building consent relating to a series of former industrial buildings at the rear of 28 Amwell Street, Islington (see Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Sanitary Reform of London: the Working Collection of Sir Joseph Bazalgette, Ca
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/ft3x0nb131 No online items Guide to the Sanitary Reform of London: The Working Collection of Sir Joseph Bazalgette, ca. 1785-1969 Processed by Special Collections staff. Department of Special Collections Green Library Stanford University Libraries Stanford, CA 94305-6004 Phone: (650) 725-1022 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www-sul.stanford.edu/depts/spc/ © 2002 The Board of Trustees of Stanford University. All rights reserved. DA676 .S26 1785 1 Guide to the Sanitary Reform of London: The Working Collection of Sir Joseph Bazalgette, ca. 1785-1969 Collection number: DA676 .S26 1785 Department of Special Collections and University Archives Rare Book Division Stanford University Libraries Stanford, California Contact Information Department of Special Collections Green Library Stanford University Libraries Stanford, CA 94305-6004 Phone: (650) 725-1022 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www-sul.stanford.edu/depts/spc/ Processed by: Special Collections staff Encoded by: Steven Mandeville-Gamble © 2002 The Board of Trustees of Stanford University. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Sanitary Reform of London: the working collection of Sir Joseph Bazalgette, Date (inclusive): ca. 1785-1969 Collection number: DA676 .S26 1785 Creator: Bazalgette, Joseph Extent: 455 items Repository: Stanford University. Libraries. Dept. of Special Collections and University Archives. Abstract: The collection documents the history of the sanitary evolution of London from the 1840s to the early twentieth century. Some 4500 separate printed, typescript, and manuscript items trace the stages by which the drainage and fresh water supply for London was introduced-- in its time perhaps the greatest feat of urban civil engineering that had ever been undertaken.
    [Show full text]
  • Amwell Street, London. Conservation of Buildings Research Analysis
    The Historic Environment Consultancy CONSERVATION OF BUILDINGS RESEARCH ANALYSIS For 48 Amwell St, Islington, London, EC1R 1XS Planning Ref P072699 Listed Building Consent Ref P072723 Appeal Ref No App/V5570/E/08/2065168/WF Appeal Ref No App/V5570/E/08/2065165/WF Dr Peter Wardle 4/04/2008 © The Historic EnvironmentConsultancy 2008 1 Historic Environment Consulltany 38 Elvendon Rd Goring on Thames Oxon RG8 0DU, T01491 875584 F01491 875239 E:[email protected] www.historicenvironment.co.uk A Conservation of Buildings Research Analysis: 48 Amwell St, Islington, London, EC1R 1XS In connection with planning application reference number: Planning Ref P072699 Listed Building Consent Ref P072723 And Appeal Reference Numbers Appeal Ref No App/V5570/E/08/2065168/WF Appeal Ref No App/V5570/E/08/2065165/WF by Dr Peter Wardle 4/April/2008 -,2#,21 1. PART 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ..................................................10 1.1 The Basis of The Report. ...........................................................10 2. Introduction ..............................................................................11 2.1 The Client ............................................................................11 2.2 Location ..............................................................................11 2.3 Short Description of the Development ...........................................11 2.4 Site Visit ..............................................................................11 3. Historic Environment Planning History & Background. .............................13
    [Show full text]
  • Obituary. Charles Greaves, 1816-1883
    CHARLESGREAVES. 355 OBITUL4RYNOTICES. CHARLES GREAVES was born at Amwell, in Hertfordshire, on the 19th of October, 1816. He wasthe eldest son of Charles Greaves,formerly of St.Paul’s Churchyard, London, and Char- lotteMylne, daughter of RobertMylne theeminent architect, who designed old Blackfriars Bridge, and for nearly fifty years held the post of architect and surveyor to St. Paul’s Cathedral, aswell as being Resident Engineer to the NewRiver Water- works for the same period. Nr. Greaves’s early years were spent on Dartmoor, thence he went to the school of the well-known Dr. Mapat Cheam, in 1824.Remaining there for about two years, he returned to his family, who had removed to Devonport, andthere he entered the Classical andMathematical School, that llad recently come under the rule of his father’s cousin, the Rev. Henry Addington Greaves. Ilis career at school was not markedby any specialbrilliancy, butrather by steady perse- verance and unflagging industry. When only thirteen years of age, young Greaves’s father died very suddenly, and the boy, the eldest of a family of six children, at once grasped the idea that hisfirst duty was to be a stay andcomfort to his widowed mother, andfor upwards of thirty years,notwithstanding the cares and anxieties of a busy, active life, he was unremitting in hisattention and considerationfor her. He wasarticled to Mr. J. M. Rendel, Past-President Inst. C.E., at Plymouth, on the 2nd of September, 1831. Thelate Mr. Nathaniel Beardmore, M. Inst. C.E., and Sir John Coode, M. Inst. C.E., who had been schoolfellows with Greaves,were also fellow-pupils with him.
    [Show full text]
  • Decisive Moments the Clerkenwell Community Photography Competition Has Yielded an Exceptional Crop, Says Organiser Chris Walker
    EC1 ECHO AUG/SEPT 2021 N 11 FREE NEWS COLUMN HISTORY EC1Echo.co.uk Pedestrianise An area can be The forgotten @EC1Echo Exmouth Market like an old friend, meanings of local now, say traders says Philippa Perry street names EC1Echo@ peelinstitute.org.uk P 5 P 7 P 12–13 /EC1Echo 'Connection', taken by William Hall in Hatton Garden during lockdown, 2020 Decisive moments The Clerkenwell Community Photography Competition has yielded an exceptional crop, says organiser Chris Walker he first Clerkenwell photography a try: from young peo- and there are no longer pricey As a beautiful public square, Community Photogra- ple with camera phones, to older developing and printing costs. Clerkenwell Green has proved phy Competition has people who remember the Box It’s been fascinating to see the a popular spot. There have been now closed and is being Brownie. The point is that pho- entries coming in. There have been quite a few shots of foxes, who are Tjudged. The initiative has encouraged tography is now truly democratic. various themes emerging, some clearly a part of our community. all parts of the local community to give Expensive kit isn’t essential, expected, some truly surprising. Continued on Pages 10–11 EC1 ECHO NO.11 August/September 2021 N 11 NEWS 2 NEWS IN BRIEF 3 AUG / Clerkenwell and SEP Moorfields set to move from City Road Green means go City wards merge in unless approaching traffic 2021 Councillors set to decide on Moorfields Eye Hospital is detected. The locations, including Long Lane, have 1st August 30th Sept relocation in ‘major step’ for local NHS services boundary review been chosen on the basis of existing high pedestrian BY ED SHERIDAN, LOCAL consultation from driven by major developments Third Waning DEMOCRACY REPORTER, WITH Quarter Crescent ADDITIONAL REPORTING FROM the England Bound- in the Bunhill, Caledonian 41% / 0.49 36% / 0.5 EC1 ECHO ary Commission’s Road, City Road and Clerken- “The green person 2023 electoral well areas”.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Holiday Catalogue
    1 TERMS Full descriptions are available upon request. Items for any reason unsatisfactory may be returned within ten days. HERITAGE BOOK SHOP 324 South Beverly Drive, Box 1421. Beverly Hills, CA 90212 Telephone 310.659.3674 [email protected] www.heritagebookshop.com Open By Appointment Only Front Cover Image: Item 44. [ENCYCLOPAEDIA BRITANNICA]. Encyclopædia Britannica; or, A Dictionary of Arts and Sciences. Compiled upon a New Plan. In which the different sciences and arts are digested into distinct treatises or systems; and the various technical terms, &c. are explained as they occur in the order of the alphabet. Illustrated with one hundred and sixty copperplates. By a Society of Gentlemen in Scotland. In three volumes. London: Printed for John Donaldson, 1773. Back Cover Image: Item 33. DICKENS, Charles. A Christmas Carol. In Prose. Being a Ghost Story of Christmas. With Illustrations by John Leech. London: Chapman & Hall, 1843. 2 In Regards to the Controversial Presidential Election of 1824 1. [ADAMS, John Quincy]. [SOMERVILLE, William]. Suggestions on Presidential Elections, With Particular Reference to a Letter of William C. Somerville, Esq. Boston: Cummings, Hilliard & co., 1825. First edition of pamphlet attributed to John Quincy Adams in support of a letter that was written by Willam Somerville regarding the need to reform the presidential election system in the United States, following the controversial election of 1824. Octavo (8 x 5 1/4 inches; 204 x 133 mm). 32 pp. Pamphlet, disbound with stab-marks present. Some mild toning, mainly to final leaf. Overall a very good copy. HBS 68256. $850 Legal Pamphlet Attempting to Examine the Legal and Constitutional Basis For the 14th Amendment 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning, Heritage & Access Statement
    PLAN N IN G, H ERIT AGE & ACCESS ST AT EMEN T LA N D T O REA R O F 28 A MW ELL ST REET , LO N D O N EC 1 ( A LSO K N O W N A S N EW RI VER H EA D ) th Rev A – 28 April 2014 The Regeneration Practice 1 Huguenot Place Heneage Str eet London E1 5LN www.regener at io n.co .uk CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 SIT E CO N T EX T 2.1 H ist o r y 2.2 Location 2.3 Local Context 2.4 Townscape Set t ing 2.5 Land Use 2.6 Public Transport accessibility 2.7 Planning Policy Context 3.0 SIT E A N A LYSIS: 3.1 Historical Significance 3.2 Statutory Listing and Conservation Area Status 3.3 Constraints 3.4 Opportunities 4.0 D ESIGN PRIN CIPLES A D O PT ED : 4.1 Land U se 4.2 Bulk and Massing 4.3 Access 4.4 Conservation Philosophy 2 5.0 T H E PRO PO SA LS: 5.1 The Design Process 5.2 Design Evolution 5.3 Analysis of Options 5.4 Repair s 5.5 Sustainability 91 6.0 A CCESS ST A T EMEN T : 6.1 Purpose of the Access Statement 6.2 Methodology 6.3 D esign St andar ds 6.4 Project Description 6.5 Access context and Site Constraints 6.6 Car Par king 6.7 Pedestrian Access 6.8 Refuse Storage Access 6.9 H ar d Landscape D esign 6.10 Building Approach 6.11 St udios, Café , H er it age D isplay and Educat ion Ar eas D esign 7.0 CONCLUSIONS A PPEN D ICES: A: Option Plans extracted from the Options Study 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Planning, Heritage and Access Statement has been prepared on behalf of Heritage of London Trust Operations Limited (HOLTO PS) to support planning and Listed Building applications for the repair and refurbishment of the Engine House, Boiler Houses, Coal Store and W ind Pump Base on the New River Head site, bringing them into public and community use to accommodat e; a) a her it age-education area that presents the site’s significance and principle st ories, and runs education programmes for schools and the community, b) office space for char it ies, and c) community and meeting room facilities and a cafe.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Report
    1 Heritage Report Flat 28, 43-53 Myddelton Square, EC1R 1YD Replacement of windows and door on rear elevation with matching windows 4D Planning, 86-90 Paul Street, 3rd Floor, London EC2A 4NE 2 Listed Buildings 43-53 Myddelton Square, EC1R 1YD is part of a terraced block consisting residential dwellings. The terrace, 31-57 Myddleton Square, is Grade II listed. The property was first listed in 29-Dec-1950. The listing refers to a terrace of 27 houses, some now flats, along the east and north sides of Myddelton Square, laid out 1824-1827 by William Chadwell Mylne, Surveyor to the New River Estate. Nos. 43-53 were rebuilt by the New River Company in 1947-48 following war damage. Nos. 31-57 Myddleton Square, a terrace of 1824-7, with Nos. 43-53 rebuilt after the Second World War, is listed at Grade II for the following principal reasons: * Architectural interest: a well-proportioned terrace forming the north and north-east sides of Myddleton Square, possessing fine stucco and cast-iron details; * Historic Interest: a cohesive architectural language secured by the development of the Square by the New River Company, founded in 1622 by Sir Hugh Myddleton; * Alteration: Nos. 43-53 were rebuilt in the same idiom by the New River Company in 1947-48 following war damage, an early example of post-war conservation-inspired reconstruction which maintains the architectural cohesion of the group and contributes further to its historic interest; * Group Value: the terrace has a high degree of group value with the other terraces of the Square and with the Church of St Mark at its centre, all listed at Grade II, with which it forms an ensemble.
    [Show full text]