DOCSLIB.ORG

A Report to the Waitangi Tribunal by R.P. Boast

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Report to the Waitangi Tribunal by R.P. Boast WAI 45 THE MURIWHENUA SOUTH AND AHIPARA PURCHASES A Report to the Waitangi Tribunal by R.P. Boast MURIWHENUA SOUTH AND AHIPARA PURCHASES Introductory letter to Waitangi Tribunal i l. INTRODUCTION 1 2. OLD LAND CLAIMS BLOCKS 3 3 . THE SALE OF MURIWHENUA SOUTH 7 4. THE BOUNDARIES OF THE MURIWHENUA SOUTH PURCHASE 16 A. Introduction 16 B. The Northern Boundary 17 C. The Western Boundary 26 D. The Southern Boundary 27 E. The East~rn Boundary 28 5. THE PURCHASE OF THE AHIPARA BLOCK 30 6 . LAKE TANGONGE 34 10 March 1992 Waitangi Tribunal Division Department of Justice WELLINGTON YOUR REF.: Mr Rigby Dear Sir REPORT ON MURIWHENUAjAHIPARA PURCHASES When this report was filed with the Waitangi Tribunal in July last year, I had not had an opportunity to proofread it or to make a number of alterations and corrections I had intended to make. This meant that the report was embarrassingly full of typographical errors, and the text of a number of paragraphs had to be departed from when the report was read out in evidence at the Muriwhenua Lands July hearing. I have now re-typed the entire report myself, and wish this to be formally entered on the record of documents as the final text of my report. Mostly it has been a correction of the original draft, but a number of sections have been re-written. I draw particular attention to paras. 4.17 and 5.4, which deal with the indications of the coastal boundaries on the Muriwhenua South and Ahipara block plans. Here the text conforms with my comments on the plans when I gave my oral evidence. At the time when the first draft was prepared, the copies of the plans I had to work with did not describe the coastal boundaries very clearly; clearer copies of the plans became available to me later. I have not altered the text in any other significant respect, and I have not attempted to modify it as a response to questions asked of me by counselor the Tribunal members during the course of the hearing. The text is essentially what I would have wished to file in the first place. R P Boast IN THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL WAI 45 IN THE HATTER of the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 IN THE HATTER of claims by THE HON. HATIU RATA and others RBPORTOHMURIIHBIUASOUTH,NfD MIPMA PURCHMIS 1 . INTRODUCTION 1.1 THIS report was commissioned after the March 1991 hearing of this Tribunal. That hearing was concerned with Ninety Hile Beach (Te Wharo Oneroa a Tohe). In the evidence I gave at that hearing I pointed out that although the Court of Appeal in In re Ninety Mile Beach (1963] NZLR 461 placed primary weight on the supposition that investigation of title by the Native Land Court would extinguish title to the foreshore, this - even supposing that it was correct - had little relevance to the legal history of Ninety Hile Beach. Only two of the principal blocks of the abutting on the beach, the Parengarenga and Ahipara Papatipu blocks, were ever investigated by the Native Land Court (the MB references are (1896) 17 Northern HB 67-215, 192-3 (Ooc 05, doc 16, 385-531), and (1909) 43 Northern HB 185, [Ooc 05, doc 19, 637-700). These two blocks are at the northern and southern ends of Ninety Hile-Beach/Te Wharo Oneroa a Tohe. In between lie the Huriwhenua South and Ahipara blocks as well as two Old Lands claims purchases, Otaki and Oklore. 1.2. One purpose of this report being commissioned was simply to clarify the position regarding the history and boundaries of these blocks as much as possible. The other purpose was to discover what, if any, light this material might throw on the question of the parties' intentions concerning the foreshore. A few points should be made about the latter aspiration. The surviving documentary evidence is actually quite sparse. Even if it were comprehensive, it still would not account for the whole story. Just as relevant would be the historical evidence about the behaviour of the parties after the transactions. Oral evidence as to Maori cultural aspects is important too. The second preliminary point I would emphasise is that the underlying issues are quite fundamental and are the cause of much disagreement. The principal underlying issue is the mana moana/manawhenua question. In Maori eyes, were property interests in the sea and its resources connected with ownership of coastal land or was the foreshore simply perceived as a separate resource? What assumptions could have governed a "sale" of a coastal block in the eyes of Maori vendors in the 1850s? Although I can raise the issue I do not feel qualified or able to fully resolve it - to do so requires expertise in the disciplines of Maori stUdies and anthropology as much as law and history. -2- 1.3. Since commencing research on this report I have learned that there al has been a sustained enquiry into an aspect of the boundaries of the Muriwhenua South block. This was concerned not with the problematic southwest corner of the block but with its ~~~~~ corner, bounding on the Parengarenga block and t shore of Great Exhibition at a point known as Wairahi (named after the Wairahi stream which drains the Wairahi swamp and Lake Taeore, and into which the Ngataenga or Ngatahinga Stream flows). On this boundary the documentation happens to be quite full and we are fortunate to have a detailed report by Judge ck dated 27 October 1933 [Annexure 4(c»). This report has some useful information relative to the sale of the Muriwhenua South Block; but although interesting in itself the Wairahi investigation does not assist with foreshore questions. 1.4. The remainder of this report is divided into the following sections: 2.0 Old Land Claims blocks; 3.0 The sa of the Muriwhenua South block; 4.0 The boundaries of the Muriwhenua South purchase: A. Introduction B. The northern boundary C. The western boundary D. The southern boundary E. The eastern boundary; 5.0 The purchase of the Ahipara block; 6.0 Lake Tangonge; 7.0 Te Wharo Oneroa a Tohe - a supplementary note. 2.1. The two OLC blocks which have a frontage on the West Coast are the Okiore and Otaki blocks. The Okiore transaction of 12 October 1839 involved Nopera Panakareao and Samuel H Ford. The Otaki transaction involved Henry Southee and was concluded between Southee and Panakareao on 17 December 1839. [For location, see Annexure 1. The two deeds are reprinted in Turton1s Purchases, vol i, 39 and 54-55, in Wai-45 Document Bank B20, Okiore 234-5; Otaki 245-6. The OLC references are 159, 300E; 875-7, 364- B.l 2.2. boundaries of the Okiore transaction are described (using the text printed in Turton) as follows:- Lo! the boundaries these. That of the East commences on the -3- the boundary of Mr Matthews, this in keeping with the Pa Tututarakihi beginning at the Water of Okiore, otherwise Wangatane, along the side of which it goes on till it joins the boundary of Richard Matthews at Te Awanui, to the landing place also of the Church Missionaries. Lo! Te Kokopu is not gone; let that place be reserved for its people. The projecting point of land beyond the village in size ten acres is enclosed within. Lo! thence proceed onward to Te Waiakainga, crossing over proceed even to Te Karamu on the Western Coast at Te Tupehau the endi Lo! this is the boundary to the South. Lol proceed onwards by Te Tupehau unto Te Taupururua. Lo! this is that of the Western boundary. Breaking off there proceed hitherwards unto the inner water Te Tangonge, arriving at (or by) Waihou until you join the water of Kaitaia thence running on one side of Ohotu even unto Waiokai to that part of the boundary of Mr Matthews, proceeding thence straight on the bearing of Tututarakihi the beginning the boundary. This is the boundary of the South. Lo! for the Church missionaries and these others the cart road to Te Awanui according to its breadth; so also fifty yards square as a landing place for the things of the Church missionaries. Lo! the Natives are to be permitted to cultivate along the banks of the Awanui river from one generation to another. [text in Wai-45 Document Bank, B32, 235] The Maori xt reads: Na, ko nga kaha enei. Ko to te Ita ka timata i te kaha 0 to te Matiu ko ia ia kei te tikanga 0 te Pa 0 Tututarakihi e timata ana i te Wai 0 Okiore ara Wangatane, ka rere tahatahi tonu a ka tutaki ki to Reihana Matiu kaha i te Awanui, ko to te Hahi Mihanere taurangi hoki. Na, ko te Kokopu kihai riro, Kia tapu taua wahi mo ono tangata. Engari ko te pito 0 te kokorutanga i waho atu 0 te Pa kotahi tekau Ekara te nui i kohia ki roto. Na ka rere tonu ano i konei tae noa ki Waikainga. Ka witi atu ka rere a te Karamu ra ano i te tuaauru kei te Tupehau te mutunga maio Na , ko te kaha ki te Hauta tenei. Na , ka ahu tonu atu ano ra te Tupehau tae noa ki te Taupururua. Na , ko to te Weta kaha tenei. Ka wawati i reira, ka ahu mai ki te Wai wakaroto 0 te Tangonge. Ka puta ki te Waihou , hono noa ki te wai nui 0 Kaitaia rere tonu atu tahatahi 0 Ohotu tae noa ki Waiokai ki te kaha 0 te Matiu ka ahu atu tika tonu ki te ritenga 0 Tututaraklhl te timatanga 0 kaha.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Treaty Rights in the Waitangi Tribunal
    © New Zealand Centre for Public Law and contributors Faculty of Law Victoria University of Wellington PO Box 600 Wellington New Zealand December 2010 The mode of citation of this journal is: (2010) 8 NZJPIL (page) The previous issue of this journal is volume 8 number 1, June 2010 ISSN 1176-3930 Printed by Geon, Brebner Print, Palmerston North Cover photo: Robert Cross, VUW ITS Image Services CONTENTS Judicial Review of the Executive – Principled Exasperation David Mullan .......................................................................................................................... 145 Uncharted Waters: Has the Cook Islands Become Eligible for Membership in the United Nations? Stephen Smith .......................................................................................................................... 169 Legal Recognition of Rights Derived from the Treaty of Waitangi Edward Willis.......................................................................................................................... 217 The Citizen and Administrative Justice: Reforming Complaint Management in New Zealand Mihiata Pirini.......................................................................................................................... 239 Locke's Democracy v Hobbes' Leviathan: Reflecting on New Zealand Constitutional Debate from an American Perspective Kerry Hunter ........................................................................................................................... 267 The Demise of Ultra Vires in New Zealand:
    [Show full text]
  • Submission on Water Issues in Aotearoa New Zealand
    Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights United Nations Office CH 1211 Geneva 10 Switzerland Submission on Water Issues in Aotearoa New Zealand By Dr Maria Bargh 1 This submission is provided in two Parts: Part One: Overview of the significance of water to Māori and current national legislation relating to water. Part Two: Overview of the potential impacts of the New Zealand government’s proposals on Māori, including with regard to private sector provisions of related services. Introduction In 2003 the New Zealand government established a Sustainable Water Programme of Action to consider how to maintain the quality of New Zealand’s water and its sustainable use. One of the models being proposed for the more efficient management of water is the market mechanism. Dominant theories internationally put forward the market as the best mechanism by which to manage resources efficiently. Given that all life on the planet needs water for survival its appropriate management, use and sustainability is of vital concern. However many communities, including Indigenous peoples, have widely critiqued the market, and the neoliberal policies which promote it, highlighting the responsiveness of the market to money rather than need. In the case of Aotearoa, moves to further utilise the market mechanism in the governance of water raises questions, not simply around the efficiency of the market in this role but also around the Crown i approach which is one of dividing the issues of marketisation, ownership and sustainability in the same manner in which they assume the river/lake beds, banks and water can be divided.
    [Show full text]
  • Rekohu Report (2016 Newc).Vp
    Rekohu REKOHU AReporton MorioriandNgatiMutungaClaims in the Chatham Islands Wa i 6 4 WaitangiTribunalReport2001 The cover design by Cliff Whiting invokes the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi and the consequent interwoven development of Maori and Pakeha history in New Zealand as it continuously unfoldsinapatternnotyetcompletelyknown AWaitangiTribunalreport isbn 978-1-86956-260-1 © Waitangi Tribunal 2001 Reprinted with corrections 2016 www.waitangi-tribunal.govt.nz Produced by the Waitangi Tribunal Published by Legislation Direct, Wellington, New Zealand Printed by Printlink, Lower Hutt, New Zealand Set in Adobe Minion and Cronos multiple master typefaces e nga mana,e nga reo,e nga karangaranga maha tae noa ki nga Minita o te Karauna. ko tenei te honore,hei tuku atu nga moemoea o ratou i kawea te kaupapa nei. huri noa ki a ratou kua wheturangitia ratou te hunga tautoko i kokiri,i mau ki te kaupapa,mai te timatanga,tae noa ki te puawaitanga o tenei ripoata. ahakoa kaore ano ki a kite ka tangi,ka mihi,ka poroporoakitia ki a ratou. ki era o nga totara o Te-Wao-nui-a-Tane,ki a Te Makarini,ki a Horomona ma ki a koutou kua huri ki tua o te arai haere,haere,haere haere i runga i te aroha,me nga roimata o matou kua mahue nei. e kore koutou e warewaretia. ma te Atua koutou e manaaki,e tiaki ka huri Contents Letter of Transmittal _____________________________________________________xiii 1. Summary 1.1 Background ________________________________________________________1 1.2 Historical Claims ____________________________________________________4 1.3 Contemporary Claims ________________________________________________9 1.4 Preliminary Claims __________________________________________________11 1.5 Rekohu, the Chatham Islands, or Wharekauri? _____________________________12 1.6 Concluding Remarks ________________________________________________13 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Waitangi Tribunal's WAI 2575 Report
    HHr Health and Human Rights Journal The Waitangi Tribunal’s WAI 2575 Report: ImplicationsHHR_final_logo_alone.indd 1 10/19/15 10:53 AM for Decolonizing Health Systems heather came, dominic o’sullivan, jacquie kidd, and timothy mccreanor Abstract Te Tiriti o Waitangi, a treaty negotiated between Māori (the Indigenous peoples of Aotearoa) and the British Crown, affirmed Māori sovereignty and guaranteed the protection of hauora (health). The Waitangi Tribunal, established in 1975 to investigate alleged breaches of the agreement, released a major report in 2019 (registered as WAI 2575) about breaches of te Tiriti within the health sector in relation to primary care, legislation, and health policy. This article explores the implications of this report for the New Zealand health sector and the decolonial transformation of health systems. The tribunal found that the Crown has systematically contravened obligations under te Tiriti across the health sector. We complement the tribunal’s findings, through critical analysis, to make five substantive recommendations: (1) the adoption of Tiriti-compliant legislation and policy; (2) recognition of extant Māori political authority (tino rangatiratanga); (3) strengthening of accountability mechanisms; (4) investment in Māori health; and (5) embedding equity and anti-racism within the health sector. These recommendations are critical for upholding te Tiriti obligations. We see these requirements as making significant contributions to decolonizing health systems and policy in Aotearoa and thereby contributing to aspirations for health equity as a transformative concept. Heather Came is Senior Lecturer at the Faculty of Health and Environment Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand. Dominic O’Sullivan is Associate Professor at the School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Canberra, Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 13 Shelly Bay Cultural Impact Statement
    CULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT WHĀTAITAI, MARUKAIKURU, SHELLY BAY Taikuru Prepared by Kura Moeahu, Peter Adds and Lee Rauhina-August on behalf of Taranaki Whānui Ki Te Upoko o Te Ika and The Port Nicholson Block Settlement Trust, September 2016 STATUS: FINAL 1 Executive Summary This is a Cultural Impact Assessment Report for Shelly Bay/Marukaikuru commissioned by the Wellington Company Limited. It assesses the Māori cultural values of Marukaikuru Bay from the perspective of the tangata whenua, namely the iwi of Taranaki Whānui represented by the PNBST. The main findings of this cultural impact assessment are: • Marukaikuru Bay has high cultural significance to the iwi of Taranaki whanui • Taranaki Whānui people actually lived in the Bay until 1835 • We have found no evidence of other iwi connections to Marukaikuru Bay • Taranaki Whānui mana whenua status in relation to Marukaikuru and the Wellington Harbour is strongly supported in the literature, including the Waitangi Tribunal report (2003) • The purchase of Shelly Bay by PNBST from the Crown was a highly significant Treaty settlement transaction specifically for the purpose of future development • Any development of Marukaikuru must adequately take account of and reflect Taranaki Whānui cultural links, history and tangata whenua status in Wellington. • Taranaki Whānui have kaitiakitanga (guardianship) responsibilities to ensure the protection of the natural, historical and cultural dimensions of Marukaikuru. • The resource consent application submitted by the Wellington Company Limited is supported by the Port Nicholson Block Settlement Trust. 2 WHĀTAITAI, MARUKAIKURU, SHELLY BAY Taikuru Kapakapa kau ana te manu muramura ki te tai whakarunga Māwewe tonu ana te motu whāriki o te tai whakararo Makuru tini e hua ki whakatupua-nuku Matuatua rahi e hua ki whakatupua-ruheruhe Pukahu mano e hua ki whakatupua-rangi Inā te tai hekenga ki runga o Tai Kuru e..
    [Show full text]
  • Bthe Waipukurau Purchase and The
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. I Mārama te Rironga ko a te Kuīni The Waipukurau Purchase and the Subsequent Consequences on Central Hawke’s Bay Māori to 1900. A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History at Massey University Manawatū, New Zealand Michael Allan Hunter 2019 i Abstract In 1820s and 1830s Māori from Central Hawke’s Bay came into contact with Pākehā for the first time and they began to trade. From this contact they began to see the benefits of Pākehā. So they requested the government to establish a Pākehā settlement and offered land for sale. Land was purchased at Waipukurau on 4 November 1851. Donald McLean made sweeping promises of benefits and riches when the deed was signed however these benefits and riches would never come to the Māori of Central Hawke’s Bay. The Waipukurau purchase opened the door for more purchases. The Māori of Central Hawke’s Bay began alienating their land. First through direct purchasing with Donald McLean then through the Native Land Court. Māori would soon find themselves in debt which would lead to the Hawke’s Bay Native Lands Alienation Commission 1873. Central Hawke’s Bay Māori emerged as leaders of the Repudiation Movement of the 1870s and then the Kotahitanga Māori Parliament of the 1890s in order to fight for their lost lands.
    [Show full text]
  • Wai 1679 Closing Submissions As at 16.08.18
    IN THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL WAI 1040 WAI 1679 IN THE MATTER of the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 AND IN THE MATTER of Te Paparahi o Te Raki Inquiry AND IN THE MATTER OF of a claim brought by Wayne Graham Stokes and Maurice Edward Penney for and on behalf of themselves and the people of Te Urikapana and Ngare Hauata hapū, the beneficiaries of the Kiwikiwi Whanau Charitable Trust and Remana and Arihi Kiwikiwi Whanau Trust CLAIMANT CLOSING SUBMISSIONS FOR NGARE HAUATA AND TE URI KAPANA Dated this 16th day of August 2018 ______________________________________________________________________ Counsel Acting: Moana Tuwhare PO Box 177 Kerikeri Northland (09) 407 9534 [email protected] 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 4 2.0 The Claimants ..................................................................................................... 5 3.0 Ngare Hauata and Te Urikapana hapū ................................................................ 5 4.0 Duties of the Crown ............................................................................................ 7 5.0 The Claims / Summary of Key Issues .................................................................. 7 6.0 Te Ngare Hauata and Te Urikapana Rohe ........................................................... 9 7.0 The Claimant Evidence ....................................................................................... 9 8.0 Te Paparahi o Te Raki Stage 1 ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Waitangi Tribunal on the Te Reo Maori Claim
    Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Report of The Waitangi Tribunal on The Te Reo Maori Claim (Wai 11) Waitangi Tribunal Department of Justice Wellington New Zealand April 1986 WELLINGTON 1993 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Original cover design by Cliff Whiting, invoking the signing of the Treaty of Waitangi and the consequent development of Maori–Pakeha history interwoven in Aotearoa, in a pattern not yet completely known, still unfolding. National Library of New Zealand Cataloguing-in-Publication data New Zealand. Waitangi Tribunal. Report of the Waitangi Tribunal on the te reo Maori claim (Wai 11). 2nd ed Wellington, N Z : The Tribunal, 1989. 1 v. (Waitangi Tribunal reports, 0113–4124) “April 1986.” First ed published in 1978 as : Finding of the Waitangi Tribunal relating to te reo Maori and a claim lodged by Huirangi Waikerepuru and nga Kaiwhakapumau i te Reo Incorporated Society (the Wellington Board of Maori Language) / Edward Taihakurei Durie, Sir Graham Stanley Latimer, Paul Basil Temm. ISBN 0–908810–05–9 1. Maori language. 2. Language policy—New Zealand I. Title. II. Series : Waitangi Tribunal reports ; 499.4 First published 1986 by the Government Printer Wellington, New Zealand Second edition published 1989 by the Waitangi Tribunal Department of Justice Wellington, New Zealand This electronic facsimile reproduction of the second edition produced 2013 Crown copyright reserved Waitangi Tribunal Reports ISSN 0113–4124 Te Reo Maori Report (Wai 11) ISBN 0–908810–05–9
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 3: Explanation to Go with Hard
    Appendix N: Kaitiaki Plan The Kaitiaki Plan with Ngati Te Ata dated 1 March 2011 is appended to this Agreement in accordance with Designation condition 123. Its attachment to this Agreement does not impose contractual obligations on either party and is not intended to alter either party’s rights or obligations under this Agreement. DOC REF 14063992_8 Kaitiaki Plan 16 Kaitiaki Plan Whatungarongaro te tangata, toitu te whenua People come and go, the land remains For the Purpose of the PPP Prison Project at Wiri Ngāti Te Ata 1 March 2011 1 Contents 1. Purpose of the Kaitiaki Plan .............................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Mana whenua and the Wiri site .............................................................................................. 4 1.2 Why a Kaitiaki Plan? ............................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Relationship between this Kaitiaki Plan and the Land Designation (RMA) process ................... 5 2. What's important to us ..................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Meaningful relationships ......................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Kaitiakitanga outcomes ........................................................................................................... 6 3. Protocols and assumptions guiding engagement .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Waitangi Tribunal on the Orakei Claim (Wai-9)
    Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Report of The Waitangi Tribunal on The Orakei Claim (Wai-9) November 1987 BROOKER & FRIEND LTD WELLINGTON Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Cover design by Cliff Whiting National Library of New Zealand Cataloguing-in-publication Data NEW ZEALAND. Waitangi Tribunal. Orakei report : report of the Waitangi Tribunal on the Orakei claim (Wai-9).—Wellington, NZ. The Tribunal, 1987.—1 v.—(Waitangi Tribunal reports, 0113–4124 ;1) “November 1987” 1. Maoris—Land Tenure. 2. Land tenure–New Zealand–Orakei–History. 3. Waitangi, Treaty of, 1840. 4. Bastion Point (NZ)–History. I. Title. II. Series : Waitangi Tribunal reports ; 1. Waitangi Tribunal Reports ISBN 0–86472–084-X First published in November 1987 by The Waitangi Tribunal Department of Justice Wellington, New Zealand Reprinted with minor corrections 1991 ©1987 Crown copyright Orakei Report (Wai 9) ISBN 0–86472–084-X Reprint typeset, printed and bound by Brooker and Friend Ltd Wellington, New Zealand Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz The clouds in yonder horizon Across the sea, are playing with The winds, whilst I am here Yearning and weeping for my son–Ah ! he’s More than a son to me ; He’s my heart’s blood . Te Kawau Orakei 19 December 1853 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Hon K T Wetere Minister of Maori Affairs Parliament Buildings WELLINGTON Te Minita Maori Te Rangatira tena koe. Tatari tonu koe i te ao, e te po.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Women's Law Journal Te Aho Kawe Kaupapa Ture a Ngā Wāhine
    NEW ZEALAND WOMEN’S LAW JOURNAL TE AHO KAWE KAUPAPA TURE A NGĀ WĀHINE Volume 111 November 2019 Volume 1 1 1, November 2019 Copyright © individual contributors 2019 Published by LexisNexis New Zealand Limited Level 1 138 The Terrace Wellington 6011 The mode of citation of this journal is: [2019] NZWLJ (page). New Zealand Women’s Law Journal — Te Aho Kawe Kaupapa Ture a ngā Wāhine is a double-blind peer reviewed journal. Decisions as to publication are made by the Editors-in-Chief. A catalogue record for this journal is available from the National Library of New Zealand. ISsN 2537-9658 (Print) ISsN 2537-9666 (Online) Editors-in-chief: Josie Te Rata and Monique van Alphen Fyfe Deputy editors: Charlotte Doyle and Katharine Guilford Marketing managers: Ihlara McIndoe and Francy Sulikosky Associate editors: Charlotte Agnew-Harington, Charlotte Best, Georgiana Fraser, Mariah Hori Te Pa, Christina Laing, Molly McCarthy, Eleanor Milne, Tariqa Satherley, Nina White and Lexie Kirconnell- Kawana Technical editors: Grace Abbott, Mia Barnett, Linda Hasan-Stein, Emma Littlewood, Mothla Majeed, Emily McGeorge, Poppy Mitchell-Anyon, Madison Russell, Grace Tong and Lauren Zwi Trustees: Allanah Colley and Ana Lenard Advisory board: Hon Justice Susan Glazebrook, Hon Justice Susan Thomas, Hon Deputy Chief Judge Caren Fox, Lady Deborah Chambers QC, Kate Davenport QC, Frances Joychild QC and Mary Scholtens QC Academic review board: Stephanie Marsden, Professor Julia Tolmie, Helen McQueen, Professor Yvette Tinsley, Cassandra Mudgway, Professor Elisabeth McDonald,
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Treaty Dead?
    Join us for Enrol now Summer School at Lincoln University Whether you want to fast track your degree, re-take a course or get a head start on your studies, enrol now for November – December, or January – February Summer School. Learn more www.lincoln.ac.nz/SummerSchool | 0800 10 60 10 If you are taking one of our courses and transferring the credit to a degree at another university, we recommend you check your plan with them first. New Zealand’s specialist land-based university Issue 23 | September 10, 2012 | critic.co.nz Join us for EDITOR Joe Stockman ART Jesus Snapdragon Stuchizzle WORDS ASSET saLES DELAYED Biscuits 06 Maddy Phillipps The National government has again delayed its asset sales Michael Neilson programme following further challenges from Maori. Lauren Wootton Zane Pocock Gus Gawn SHADY SHEIK Ines Shennan 08 Isaac Mcfarlane An Australian Sheik that invited an al Qaeda recruiter to speak at Toby Hills his mosque speaks at Otago’s Islam awareness week. Bronwyn Wallace Beaurey Chan Josef Alton Sarah Baillie 21ST CENTURY ScarfiES Tash Smillie 18 Claudia Herron Too cool to care? Michael Neilson takes the pulse of our generation Josie Adams and asks, why don’t we give a fuck? Alice Mcrae Georgina Klein Sam Allen IS THE TREATY DEAD? Alice O’connell 22 Holly Walker Lauren Wootton sorts out fact from fiction and asks, what does the Sam Mcchesney Treaty matter today? Brittany Mann Lukas Clark-Memler Jamie Burford Toby Newberry THE GREAT CriTIC POLITICS QUIZ Feby Idrus 26 Enrol now Dan Benson-Guiu Our resident political gurus sort the wheat from the chaff, and the Michaela Hunter liberals from the libertarians with our very scientific quiz.
    [Show full text]