Protistology Epigenetic Factors in Vital Functions of the Ciliate Dileptus Anser
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Protistology 12 (2), 61–72 (2018) Protistology Epigenetic factors in vital functions of the ciliate Dileptus anser Zoya I. Uspenskaya Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia | Submitted April 17, 2018 | Accepted June 8, 2018 | Summary The article reviews data on serotypes of various clones of the ciliate Dileptus anser and results of hybridologic analysis of the mating types features obtained during the long-term studies. The current knowledge on Dileptus in terms of epigenetic variation and inheritance is summarized and discussed. Key words: ciliates, Dileptus anser, serotypes, mating types, genetics, non-Mendelian inheritance, epigenetics Introduction object not only for protistological but also for the basic biological research. Genetic studies The genetic features of ciliates define their of this ciliate have never been performed until role as useful model organisms for discovering and mid-XXth century, which undoubtedly hinders its understanding the mechanisms of heredity. Early further use as a laboratory model. In the 1970s, genetic analysis carried out by Sonneborn (1937) such studies began in the Laboratory of Cytology showed that the transmission of many heritable of Unicellular Organisms, Institute of Cytology sings cannot be fully explained by the Mendel laws. RAS, St. Petersburg, Russia. The clones of dilepti Today nobody doubts that a substantial role in the were obtained from the individuals isolated at processes of vital functions of a cell belongs to the different times from natural reservoirs in the epigenetic factors. Epigenetics develops rapidly, and Leningrad District. Dilepti were cultivated at 25° the data on epigenetic variability are continuously C in Prescott’s inorganic medium and fed with the supplemented with new important scientific infor- ciliate Tetrahymena pyriformis (Nikolaeva, 1968). mation. Modern views on epigenetic variability This species was a new one for research on genetics are largely influenced by research carried out on and epigenetics of ciliates and highly promising in ciliates. The study of ciliates allowed, thanks to their terms of comparative genetics of these protozoa. For unique biology, to discover some new examples those studies, the characters were selected which of epigenetic heredity. Epigenetics included all were typical for classical genetics of ciliates, namely, inherited changes not related to differences in DNA serotypes and mating types. base sequences (Preer, 1993; Russo et al.,1996). For ciliates, epigenesis can be determined in the Serotypes in Dileptus anser observed cases of non-Mendelian heredity. The ciliate Dileptus anser (Rhynchostomatia, Serotype of ciliates is determined by immunolo- Litostomatea) (see: Adl et al., 2012) is a common gical methods and results from the presence of a doi:10.21685/1680-0826-2018-12-2-1 © 2018 The Author(s) Protistology © 2018 Protozoological Society Affiliated with RAS 62 · Zoya I. Uspenskaya certain class of proteins distributed on the surface of (Uspenskaya, 1988). In 33 combinations, there the cilia and the outer membrane of the cell (Beale was no reaction with heterologous ISs, and it was and Mott, 1962; Doerder, 1981). These proteins are clear evidence that they had some other serotypes called immobilization antigens (i-antigens) because determined by other surface antigens. However, when ciliates are treated with homologous immune in 4 heterologous combinations with one of the serum (IS) in a certain concentration, the cells ISs and in 1 combination with the other one, weak become immobilized. The function of these surface immobilization reaction was registered, indicating proteins is still unknown. The essential features of some similarity of the serotype in reacting to the antigenic structure of ciliates are its diversity and heterologous and homologous clones. Subsequently, variability detected as early as in the 40s of the last some other clones were investigated, and cross- century (see one of the first reviews: Beale, 1954). reactions between the ISs and ciliates cultured at Under different conditions, ciliates of the same clone different temperatures were also observed. These may express different i-antigens. This genic system observations were made for clones #28 and #29, operates on the principle of mutual exclusion of the subclones of each of them being cultured at 25 and genes, i.e. only one i-antigen can be revealed on 17° C. Two ISs were prepared against two cultures the surface of cells at any given moment (Nanney, of #5D clone which were cultured at the same 1980). In some cases, this rule concerns not only temperatures (IS-5D-25 and IS-5D-17). Each IS different genes but also different alleles of the gene. immobilized only homologous (“warm” or “cold”) Exclusions are extremely rare. When changing the #5D cells. Nevertheless, at both temperatures #29 cultivation conditions or under some treatment, the subclones reacted with both of these heterologous replacement of one surface protein with another ISs obtained against 5D cells. Similarly, both IS- one and the cell serotype transformation occurs. 5D-25 and IS-5D-17 immobilized cells of the #28 Of greatest interest in the serotype system in ciliates clone cultured at 17 or 25° C. Consequently, the are mechanisms of regulation of activity of the clones #28 and #29 had the same serotype at both surface protein genes that ensure their expression temperatures. Such type of cross-reactions has been according to the principle of mutual exclusion, as described in Paramecium. well as a tendency of some established serotype to When discussing the nature of cross-reactions be inherited in a series of cell generations. These of antisera with heterologous D. anser subclones issues have been the subjects of numerous studies that were cultured at different temperatures and (see Bleyman, 1996). comparing our results with the available literature A set of D. anser clones was used in our expe- data, we suggest that the incidence of cross-reactions riments. Immune sera (ISs) were obtained by immu- can be explained in two ways. First, serotype of #28 nizing rabbits with cell homogenate prepared from and #29 clones, which is detected at both 17 and 25° mass culture of a corresponding clone. Each of such C, may be determined by a single i-antigen related to ISs was considered to be homologous to the cells “warm” and “cold” serotypes of #5D, but manifests used for immunization and heterologous to the itself in a wider range of temperatures. Another cells of all other clones. At first, ISs were obtained possibility is that, contrary to the principle of mutual against two different clones of dilepti. Like other exclusion, cells of #28 and #29 clones synthesize well-studied representatives of ciliates (Paramecium two different antigens, which are simultaneously and Tetrahymena), dilepti demonstrated good ability expressed at both temperatures (Uspenskaya and to induce the formation of specific antibodies after Yudin, 1992). Under constant conditions, serotype immunization of rabbits with cells of a certain clone of dilepti remained unchanged in a great number of ciliates. Both ISs were characterized by high of agamic cell generations. When testing the above titers and caused characteristic immobilization clones a year and a few years later, there was almost reaction when applied to the homologous cells, 100% immobilization of cells with homologous sera thus showing the association of the IS specificity and the lack of cell response to heterologous sera. with a given i-antigen. Such reactions have been Testing other clones that had further enriched the described in Paramecia and Tetrahymena many laboratory collection revealed only 2–3 additional times (reviews: Beale, 1954, 1957). Using two cases of cross-reactions. antisera, the serotypes of 20 Dileptus clones of So, the use of even a small number of ISs different origin were identified. Totally, 38 hete- revealed wide polymorphism of serotypes in natural rologous “cell-to-serum” combinations were tested populations of D. anser, and this polymorphism Protistology · 63 was maintained during long-term cultivation under the differences between B and D serotypes was constant conditions. To investigate the inheritance unknown. In the simplest case, this difference of serotypes in D. anser during sexual processes, we could be for just one locus (allelic differences) or used two clones, #B and #D, grown from individuals for two different loci. The absence of any serological independently isolated from nature. These clones cross-reactions between B and D clones indicates belonged to a complementary mating types I significant immunological differences between the and III, actively conjugated and showed no cross corresponding i-antigens. This might be an evidence reaction when tested by immobilizing cells with of nonallelic nature of the respective serotypes. antisera, i.e. showed two different, clearly distinct Phenotype in F1 clones was certainly “hybrid”. If B serotypes that were stably maintained under the and D serotypes are allelic, then we are dealing with same culture conditions. ISs were obtained against co-expression of the corresponding alleles; if they these clones. Thereafter, their crossing was made. are non-allelic, then in D. anser there is a violation Cells of one of the two clones were labeled with of the principle of mutual exclusion of different loci Indian ink for precise identification and selection of controlling surface i-antigens. This challenge could heterotypic pairs. In a paired state the cells were for be resolved by receiving F2 progeny and analyzing 20–22 h, and exconjugants were isolated and grown. the segregation of studied traits. When testing Unfortunately, it was impossible to see the label in exconjugant F1 clones for their mating types, it was the isolated exconjugants in order to identify their found that most of the survivors were fully mature “cytoplasmic” origin. and belonged to mating type II. For this reason, to Exconjugant F1 clones were tested for cell obtain further F2 progeny, the F1 clones were mated immobilization reaction using ISs raised against with each of the “parent” clones (backcrossing).