DOCSLIB.ORG

Mentioned Fields:At Least Descriptions of American

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mentioned Fields:At Least Descriptions of American SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE STATE OF SCIENCE IN AMERICA DURING THE NINETEENTH CENTURY BY I. BERNARD COHEN HARVARD UNIVERSITY For Americans the outstanding problem in the history of science is to try to understand the failure of our country to produce a great scientific tradition in the nineteenth century. In presenting this problem, I have limited my discussion to the period from Franklin to Gibbs, two Americans who by their fundamental contri- butions to physics won the highest distinctions in science, such as foreign or honor- ary membership in the world's great scientific societies and academies-including both the Acad6mie des Sciences (Paris) and the Royal Society of London. Be- tween the two, the record in physics is meager. To be sure, we can always point with pride to Joseph Henry, but the fact remains that Henry was simply not in the same class with Faraday, Clerk Maxwell, Young, Fresnel, Ampere, Joule, Kelvin, Biot, Bunsen, Kirchhoff, Mayer, Helmholtz, and the other greatest giants of the nineteenth century in physics. Furthermore, if we seek mathematical creators in the same interval, there are the members of the Peirce family, but the only outstanding genius in mathematics in America in the nineteenth century was J. J. Sylvester, an Englishman who twice graced our shores. In astronomy things were a little better. There was Newcomb at the century's end and Pickering, and the early photographic experiments-the daguerrotype being used in conjunction with a telescope-and the work of Draper. But how paltry even this is by comparison with the great work done in Europe. In chemistry there are two contributions recorded in European annals: Hare's blowtorch and plunge battery and at the century's end the work of Josiah Parsons Cooke on the periodic classification of the chemical elements. In geology, America contributed more than in the above- mentioned fields: at least descriptions of American geological formations made by native scientists were esteemed by Europeans. And the same is true of the bio- logical sciences to an extent which may aggrandize the work of such botanists as John Torrey and Asa Gray all out of their due proportion. When all is said and done, however, so far as the great new ideas are concerned, or even ideas of some- what lesser importance, the contributions of the nineteenth century made in America are few at best and enter the world's literature largely by courtesy. In one science only is it generally admitted that a major first-class contribution came from Amer- ica-but, alas, the field is one which is not central to our understanding of the nature and interactions of matter, the creation and life of the universe as a whole, or the evolution of life and the basic nature of living functions. I refer, of course, to the work of Matthew Fontaine Maury, esteemed as a founder of the science of oceanography. One can have only the highest admiration for the brave pioneering work of William Beaumont, who made so much of an extraordinary opportunity to study the physiology of digestion. But the pitiful state of American science in his day can be seen in the enormous difficulties Beaumont encountered in at- tempting to do research and the general lack of appreciation of his magnificent achievements, which fortunately were esteemed in Europe. Before exploring this period further, and inquiring into its relevance for our understanding of our own times, let me first clarify one or two major aspects of the 666 Downloaded by guest on September 29, 2021 VOL. 45, 1959 ANTHROPOLOGY: I. B. COHEN 667 problem in the light of history. To begin with, we must face the question whether or not the production of men of science of the highest rank of genius is at all an index of scientific culture. We know so little about the biology of genius-its production and ecology-that perhaps it is not statistically meaningful to use data of this kind in characterizing our American culture. For let us suppose that there are twenty or thirty men of the highest scientific genius produced in the nineteenth century and that the countries where we might expect to find them include America, England, Scotland, Ireland, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Austria-Hungary, Germany, Russia, France, Belgium, Holland, Denmark, and Sweden. Taking as a weighting factor for each country its total population, or its number of enrolled college stu- dents, it may turn out that the American failure is not statistically significant. We would tend, therefore, to ask about a larger group, for instance the hundred or two hundred major scientists, the grade A men, not necessarily the A-plus: but the record would still be a poor one. Or, perhaps an even better index of our scientific culture might be the extent to which European scientists cited American scientific work-and here I mean not merely the descriptions of American fauna and flora or geological formations-or the magnitude of the European use of American scientific ideas. Pick up a European history of science in general, or any branch of science in particular, and we must ask whether the general omission of Americans can possibly be an act of ignorance or of mere national prejudice? Historians usually couple the absence of great American science in the nineteenth century with the growth of America to the west and the rise of American industrial society. It is clear, I believe, and beyond argument, that in engineering, in the various applications of science, in inventiveness, America became a major nation early in the nineteenth century. Any comparative study of the number of inven- tions per capita in nineteenth-century America and other countries (by the crude method of counting patents) readily shows a greater number made by Americans than by those of any other nationality. Military historians often agree that the beginning of modern warfare occurred in the American Civil War; think of these innovations-iron-clad warships, fixed ammunition, naval guns with rifling, mass- produced uniforms and shoes, movement of troops by railroad, aerial observation, telegraph communication between headquarters and the front, photography, gas warfare, machine guns, and so on down a long list. No better index of American technological innovation could be found. We must keep in mind that until almost the end of the nineteenth century, technology and engineering did not in general depend on the applications of pure science, by which I mean the discovery of new scientific principles. This was the era of empirical innovation and the time of mechanical invention. A typical major invention was barbed wire (Glidden's patent of 1874), based on a device for twisting two strands of wire with occasional barbed spurs. This wire made homesteading possible; in the great plains there was no supply of wood or stone for use in fencing off ploughed land to protect it from cattle. The reaper and sewing machine and the Colt revolver are other examples of this "mechanical" type of invention. Yet as early as the 1840's, the applications of scientific discovery were beginning to be of importance. As a type may I cite the telegraph and photography-both depend- ing on recent discoveries in the pure sciences of physics and chemistry. From then Downloaded by guest on September 29, 2021 668 ANTHROPOLOGY: 1. B. COHEN PROC. N. A. S. until now, with constant acceleration for about one hundred years, America has excelled in the applications of science-but not necessarily the science she has herself produced. It is often assumed that the tradition in America has been one of engineering opposed to science, of applied rather than pure science. This point of view is misleading, not only because engineering had little to do with science during most of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries; it is also wrong because in the Colonial period and well into the middle of the nineteenth century, our colleges trained no engineers. Until well into the 1840's, there was a conspicuous lack of interest in America in any form of engineering. When George Washington assumed command of the Continental army in Cambridge and surveyed his troops, he at once wrote a letter describing his two major needs: gunpowder (not then manufactured in Amer- ica) and engineers "to supervise the works." Franklin's first two jobs on arriving in France were to get gunpowder and to recruit from the "corps de g6nie" some trained military engineers-chief among them were Louis DuPortail who laid out Valley Forge and was in large measure responsible for the plans at Yorktown. When the war was won, DuPortail drew up plans for a national academy of military engineering to be established at West Point. There was then founded the United States Military Philosophical Society, dedicated to the sciences of war and of peace, America's first national scientific academy. Both did not survive very long. When the U.S. Military Academy at West Point was revived after 1812, it long remained the only training center for engineers of any sort in America. That explains why the railroads were all laid out by Army men: there weren't any other engineers in this country save for a few men trained in Europe. One American, Charles Storer Storrow, had the good fortune to be able to attend the Ecole Na- tionale des Ponts et Chauss6es in Paris; his services were so much in demand as consultant for canal building, and the use of water for industrial purposes, that he quickly built one of the great American fortunes. America's first engineering school was Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (founded in 1824).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Josiah Parsons Cooke Jr.: Epistemology in the Service of Science, Pedagogy, and Natural Theology
    Josiah Parsons Cooke Jr.: Epistemology in the Service of Science, Pedagogy, and Natural Theology Stephen M. Contakes and Christopher Kyle Abstract: Josiah Parsons Cooke established chemistry education at Harvard University, initiated an atomic weight research program, and broadly impacted American chemical education through his students, the introduction of labo- ratory instruction, textbooks, and influence on Harvard’s admissions require- ments. The devoutly Unitarian Cooke also articulated and defended a biogeo- chemical natural theology, which he defended by arguing for commonalities between the epistemologies of science and religion. Cooke’s pre-Mendeleev classification scheme for the elements and atomic weight research were moti- vated by his interest in numerical order in nature, which reflected his belief in a divine lawgiver. Keywords: Biography, philosophy of education, epistemology of science, natural theology, chemistry and religion. 1. Introduction Today, Harvard University’s Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biol- ogy is among the finest in the world, counting three Nobel laureates and 17 members of the National Academy of Sciences among its 37 faculty (Jacob- son 2010). Its road to this distinction began inauspiciously in 1850 with the appointment of a 23-year old largely self-taught chemist, Josiah Parsons Cooke, as Erving Professor of Chemistry and Mineralogy. Over the interven- ing 44 years, Cooke’s strenuous and fruitful efforts as a teacher, department builder, researcher, and science popularizer significantly advanced chemistry instruction both at Harvard and throughout the Unites States. His efforts were so successful that after his death Harvard President Charles W. Eliot claimed Cooke “created the Chemical and Mineralogical department of Har- vard University” (Eliot 1895, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Bibliography of American History Through Biography
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 088 763 SO 007 145 AUTHOR Fustukjian, Samuel, Comp. TITLE Selected Bibliography of American History through Biography. PUB DATE Aug 71 NOTE 101p.; Represents holdings in the Penfold Library, State University of New York, College at Oswego EDRS PRICE MF-$0.75 HC-$5.40 DESCRIPTORS *American Culture; *American Studies; Architects; Bibliographies; *Biographies; Business; Education; Lawyers; Literature; Medicine; Military Personnel; Politics; Presidents; Religion; Scientists; Social Work; *United States History ABSTRACT The books included in this bibliography were written by or about notable Americans from the 16th century to the present and were selected from the moldings of the Penfield Library, State University of New York, Oswego, on the basis of the individual's contribution in his field. The division irto subject groups is borrowed from the biographical section of the "Encyclopedia of American History" with the addition of "Presidents" and includes fields in science, social science, arts and humanities, and public life. A person versatile in more than one field is categorized under the field which reflects his greatest achievement. Scientists who were more effective in the diffusion of knowledge than in original and creative work, appear in the tables as "Educators." Each bibliographic entry includes author, title, publisher, place and data of publication, and Library of Congress classification. An index of names and list of selected reference tools containing biographies concludes the bibliography. (JH) U S DEPARTMENT Of NIA1.114, EDUCATIONaWELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OP EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO DUCED ExAC ICY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATIONORIGIN ATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILYREPRE SENT OFFICIAL NATIONAL INSTITUTEOF EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY PREFACE American History, through biograRhies is a bibliography of books written about 1, notable Americans, found in Penfield Library at S.U.N.Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
    1 • I / i PROCEEDINGS AMERICAN ACADEMY ARTS AND SCIENCES. NEW SERIES. Vol. IX. WHOLE SERIES. Vol. XVII. FROM JUNE, 1881, TO JUNE, 1882. SELECTED FROM THE RECORDS. BOSTON: UNIVERSITY PRESS: JOHN WILSON AND SON. 1882. X fi^ CONTENTS. PAQE I. Contributions from the Chemical Laboratory of Harvard College. By Josiah Parsons Cooke 1 II. On the Spectrum of Arsenic. By Oliver W. Huntington 35 III. Thermoelectricity. — Peltier and Thomson Effects. By Charles Bingham Penrose 39 IV. Thermoelectric Line of Copper and Nickel below 0°. By Charles Bingham Penrose 47 V. Crystalline Form of Cryolite. By W. H. Melville ... 55 VI. Researches on the Complex Inorganic Acids. Phospho-molyb- dates. By Wolcott Gibbs, M.D . 62 VII. An Indirect Determination of Chlorine and Bromine by Elec- trolysis. By' Leonard P. Kixnicutt 91 VIII. Contributions from the Chemical Laboratory of Harvard Col- lege. By Charles F. Mabery 94 "^ IX. On Certain Substances obtainedfrom Turmeric. — I. Curcumin. By C. Loring Jackson and A. E. Menke 110 X. Contributions from the Chemical Laboratory of Harvard Col- lege. By Henry B. Hill 125 XI. XV. — Simple Method for Calibrating T'hermometers. By Silas W. Holman 157 XII. Contributions to North American Botany. By Asa Gray . 163 XIII. The Wedge Photometer. By Edward C. Pickering . 231 XIV. On the Color and the Pattern of Insects. By Dr. II. A. Hagen 234 IV CONTENTS. PAGE XV. On Telephoning over long Distances or through Cables. By N. D. C. Hodges 268 XVI. On the Young Stages of some Osseous Fishes. With Plates. By Alexander Agassiz 271 XVII. XVI.
    [Show full text]
  • A Century of Mathematics in America, Peter Duren Et Ai., (Eds.), Vol
    Garrett Birkhoff has had a lifelong connection with Harvard mathematics. He was an infant when his father, the famous mathematician G. D. Birkhoff, joined the Harvard faculty. He has had a long academic career at Harvard: A.B. in 1932, Society of Fellows in 1933-1936, and a faculty appointmentfrom 1936 until his retirement in 1981. His research has ranged widely through alge­ bra, lattice theory, hydrodynamics, differential equations, scientific computing, and history of mathematics. Among his many publications are books on lattice theory and hydrodynamics, and the pioneering textbook A Survey of Modern Algebra, written jointly with S. Mac Lane. He has served as president ofSIAM and is a member of the National Academy of Sciences. Mathematics at Harvard, 1836-1944 GARRETT BIRKHOFF O. OUTLINE As my contribution to the history of mathematics in America, I decided to write a connected account of mathematical activity at Harvard from 1836 (Harvard's bicentennial) to the present day. During that time, many mathe­ maticians at Harvard have tried to respond constructively to the challenges and opportunities confronting them in a rapidly changing world. This essay reviews what might be called the indigenous period, lasting through World War II, during which most members of the Harvard mathe­ matical faculty had also studied there. Indeed, as will be explained in §§ 1-3 below, mathematical activity at Harvard was dominated by Benjamin Peirce and his students in the first half of this period. Then, from 1890 until around 1920, while our country was becoming a great power economically, basic mathematical research of high quality, mostly in traditional areas of analysis and theoretical celestial mechanics, was carried on by several faculty members.
    [Show full text]
  • Nov07 NUCLEUS Aa4b
    DED UN 18 O 98 F http://www.nesacs.org N Y O T R E I T H C E N O A E S S S L T A E A C R C I N S M S E E H C C TI N O CA February 2009 Vol. LXXXVII, No. 6 N • AMERI Monthly Meeting Professor Wilton L. Virgo of Wellesley College to Speak at Simmons College Tips for Job Seekers By Megan Driscoll Summer Scholar Report Identification of Genes Regulated by Transcriptional Regulator, p8 By Derek Kong This Month in Chemical History By Harold Goldwhite, California State University, Los Angeles February Historical Events in Chemistry by Leopold May, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC February 1, 1905 methods for the determination of ing and used it against pellagra and Fifty years ago, Emilio Segré shared crystal structures, was born on this pursued the idea that diseases such the Nobel Prize in Physics (1959) day. as beriberi, scurvy, rickets and pella- with Owen Chamberlain for their gra were caused by lack of vital sub- discovery of the antiproton. He co- February 16, 1955 stances in the diet. discovered technetium with C. Per- F. P. Bundy, H. T. Hall, H. M. Strong rier in 1937, and astatine with D. R. and R. H. O. Wentoff announced the February 25, 1880 Corson and R. MacKenzie in 1940, synthesis of diamonds at General Arthur B. Lamb, who was the editor and demonstrated the existence of Electric Research Laboratories on of the Journal of the American the antiproton in 1955.
    [Show full text]
  • P1.3 Chemical Genealogy of an Atmospheric Chemist: James N. Pitts, Jr., a Case Study
    P1.3 CHEMICAL GENEALOGY OF AN ATMOSPHERIC CHEMIST: JAMES N. PITTS, JR., A CASE STUDY Jeffrey S. Gaffney* and Nancy A. Marley Environmental Research Division Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 1. INTRODUCTION It is indeed a desirable thing to be well descended, but Pitts’ group researched the basic chemistry and the glory belongs to our ancestors. kinetics of gas-phase reactions involved in air pollution - Plutarch (AD 46?-120) and developed methods for studying and detecting these species. As director of the Statewide Air Pollution Plutarch makes an interesting point. It is important to Research Center at the University of California, understand our background and where we came from if Riverside, he led the development of smog chamber we are to really understand the process of creative construction and studies on the fundamental processes effort. Mentoring is a key aspect of atmospheric and production rates of ozone and other oxidants. His chemistry. Our thesis mentors and colleagues have early work focused on singlet-oxygen chemistry, while major influence on us and our research through their his later work addressed the presence and formation of discussions and work during the periods in our careers mutagens in aerosols found in photochemical smog. when we study with them. Here, I explore his mentors and search for links and similar interests in atmospheric chemistry, analytical How far back does this mentoring influence trace? technique development, physical organic chemistry, and Our mentors influence us, but they were impacted by fundamental processes in biological toxicology. their mentors, and so on. Presented here is a chemical genealogy of a well-known atmospheric chemist and mentor (thesis mentor for J.
    [Show full text]
  • THEODORE WILLIAM RICHARDS January 31, 1868-April 2, 1928
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES T H E O D O R E W I L L I A M R ICHARDS 1868—1928 A Biographical Memoir by JAMES BRYANT CONANT Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1974 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WASHINGTON D.C. THEODORE WILLIAM RICHARDS January 31, 1868-April 2, 1928 BY JAMES BRYANT CONANT HEODORE WILLIAM RICHARDS was a precocious son of distin- Tguished parents. He was born in Philadelphia on January 31, 1868, the third son and fifth child of William Trost Richards and Anna Matlack Richards, who had been married on June 30, 1856. As strict members of the Society of Friends, the Matlack family looked askance at a young man who earned his living painting pictures. Anna was "read out of meeting." The Quaker marriage ceremony took place in the house of a friend. The first months of the honeymoon were devoted to the com- position and illustration of a manuscript volume of poems for the lady who had first brought the young couple together. A mutual interest in Browning and Tennyson had started an acquaintanceship which rapidly became a romance. An old friend and fellow artist of Philadelphia reminiscing long after W. T. Richards had established his reputation as a landscape painter said, "He amazed me by getting married and resigning his position as designer [in a local firm manufacturing gas fixtures] in order to devote himself entirely to his art.
    [Show full text]
  • Asa Gray's Plant Geography and Collecting Networks (1830S-1860S)
    Finding Patterns in Nature: Asa Gray's Plant Geography and Collecting Networks (1830s-1860s) The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Hung, Kuang-Chi. 2013. Finding Patterns in Nature: Asa Gray's Citation Plant Geography and Collecting Networks (1830s-1860s). Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Accessed April 17, 2018 4:20:57 PM EDT Citable Link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11181178 This article was downloaded from Harvard University's DASH Terms of Use repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA (Article begins on next page) Finding Patterns in Nature: Asa Gray’s Plant Geography and Collecting Networks (1830s-1860s) A dissertation presented by Kuang-Chi Hung to The Department of the History of Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of History of Science Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts July 2013 © 2013–Kuang-Chi Hung All rights reserved Dissertation Advisor: Janet E. Browne Kuang-Chi Hung Finding Patterns in Nature: Asa Gray’s Plant Geography and Collecting Networks (1830s-1860s) Abstract It is well known that American botanist Asa Gray’s 1859 paper on the floristic similarities between Japan and the United States was among the earliest applications of Charles Darwin's evolutionary theory in plant geography. Commonly known as Gray’s “disjunction thesis,” Gray's diagnosis of that previously inexplicable pattern not only provoked his famous debate with Louis Agassiz but also secured his role as the foremost advocate of Darwin and Darwinism in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • A Book Collector's View of the Periodic Table: Key Documents
    Firenze University Press www.fupress.com/substantia A Book Collector’s View of the Periodic Table: Key Documents before Mendeleev’s Citation: G. S. Girolami (2019) A Book Collector’s View of the Periodic Table: Contributions of 1869 Key Documents before Mendeleev’s Contributions of 1869. Substantia 3(2) Suppl. 5: 109-124. doi: 10.13128/Sub- stantia-592 Gregory S. Girolami Copyright: © 2019 G. S. Girolami. School of Chemical Sciences, 600 S. Mathews Ave., University of Illinois at Urbana- This is an open access, peer-reviewed Champaign, Urbana, 61801, US article published by Firenze University E-mail: [email protected] Press (http://www.fupress.com/substan- tia) and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Abstract. The present article identifies and discusses some of the books and scientif- License, which permits unrestricted ic articles that played important roles in the development of the periodic law, before use, distribution, and reproduction Mendeleev published his Periodic System in 1869. For each book, information is giv- in any medium, provided the original en about the edition in which the discovery was made, and for each scientific article, author and source are credited. information is given about the form in which it was issued, such as whether offprints Data Availability Statement: All rel- were printed in addition to the journal appearance. Some observations of interest to evant data are within the paper and its book collectors are included, such as assessments of the availability of these documents Supporting Information files. on the rare book market. This paper may also be of use to those who wish to learn about (or to teach) the history of the periodic law from the original documents that Competing Interests: The Author(s) first announced important advances toward its creation.
    [Show full text]
  • Miranda, 5 | 2011 Jim Endersby, Imperial Nature: Joseph Hooker and the Practices of Victorian S
    Miranda Revue pluridisciplinaire du monde anglophone / Multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal on the English- speaking world 5 | 2011 South and Race / Staging Mobility in the United States Jim Endersby, Imperial Nature: Joseph Hooker and the Practices of Victorian Science Laurence Talairach-Vielmas Édition électronique URL : http://journals.openedition.org/miranda/2550 ISSN : 2108-6559 Éditeur Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès Référence électronique Laurence Talairach-Vielmas, « Jim Endersby, Imperial Nature: Joseph Hooker and the Practices of Victorian Science », Miranda [En ligne], 5 | 2011, mis en ligne le 29 novembre 2011, consulté le 25 octobre 2018. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/miranda/2550 Ce document a été généré automatiquement le 25 octobre 2018. Miranda is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Jim Endersby, Imperial Nature: Joseph Hooker and the Practices of Victorian S... 1 Jim Endersby, Imperial Nature: Joseph Hooker and the Practices of Victorian Science Laurence Talairach-Vielmas RÉFÉRENCE Jim Endersby, Imperial Nature : Joseph Hooker and the Practices of Victorian Science (Chicago and London : The University of Chicago Press, [2008] 2010), 429 p, ISBN 978–0–226–20791– 9 1 L’ouvrage de Jim Endersby, Imperial Nature : Joseph Hooker and the Practices of Victorian Science, ne se veut pas une biographie du naturaliste Joseph Dalton Hooker (1817–1911). Bien au contraire. Hooker fut un scientifique véritablement victorien, dont la carrière retrace l’évolution du statut de scientifique, les enjeux et tensions au cœur de la profession et les liens entre scientifiques et naturalistes amateurs. L’étude de Endersby se concentre sur les années charnières de la carrière de Hooker, avant son accession à la tête de Kew Gardens, à un moment où le statut du scientifique est en pleine évolution.
    [Show full text]
  • The Smithsonian and the US Navy in the North Pacific in The
    Pacific Science (1998), vol. 52, no. 4: 301-307 © 1998 by University of Hawai'i Press. All rights reserved "In Behalf of the Science of the Country": The Smithsonian and the U.S. Navy in the North Pacific in the 1850s1 MARC ROTHENBERG 2 ABSTRACT: During the early l850s, the United States launched two major expeditions to the Pacific, as well as a series of surveys of the American West. Although the U.S. Army had developed a strong symbiotic relationship with the civilian scientific community, the U.S. Navy was still attempting to define its role in American science. This paper compares and contrasts the role of science, especially civilian science, in the U.S. Naval Expedition to Japan and the U.S. Naval Expedition to the North Pacific in the context of American military-civilian scientific cooperation during that period. Special attention is paid to the role of the Smithsonian Institution, the leading civilian scientific institution in the United States, in the two naval expeditions. IN THE EARLY l850s, the U.S. Navy launched and scientific reconnaissances in the Ameri­ two major expeditions to the Pacific. These can West known as the Pacific Railroad Sur­ were the U.S. Naval Expedition to Japan, veys. The primary objective of these surveys better known as the Perry Expedition, which was to provide data to allow an informed set sail in November 1852, and the U.S. Naval decision as to the route for the transconti­ Expedition to the North Pacific, also known nental railroad. These surveys were the cul­ as the North Pacific Exploring Expedition mination of a number of pre-Civil War or the Ringgold/Rodgers Expeditions, which expeditions conducted by the army in the departed the United States in June 1853.
    [Show full text]
  • Rafinesque Charles Boewe Filson Club
    The Kentucky Review Volume 7 | Number 3 Article 4 Fall 1987 The alF l From Grace of That "Base Wretch" Rafinesque Charles Boewe Filson Club Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kentucky-review Part of the United States History Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Boewe, Charles (1987) "The alF l From Grace of That "Base Wretch" Rafinesque," The Kentucky Review: Vol. 7 : No. 3 , Article 4. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/kentucky-review/vol7/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Kentucky Libraries at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Kentucky Review by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Fall From Grace of tt That "Base Wretch" Rafinesque Charles Boewe ll. Constantine Samuel Rafinesque (1783-1840) is known in Kentucky because of his short and stormy professorship at Transylvania University, 1819-1826, during its period of greatness under the presidency of the Rev. Horace Holley. Better remembered for his eccentricities than for his lasting accomplishments-largely because of a colorful account by his friend Audubon1-he continues to { elicit popular interest as a square peg in a round hole.2 The events s of his life are known almost entirely from A Life of Travels, the short autobiography he published in Philadelphia, at his own expense, in 1836. Like other autobiographies, this slim volume must be treated with a degree of skepticism wherever its events are not corroborated by the accounts of others.
    [Show full text]