THE GAULLIST SYSTEM in ASIA the CONSTITUTION of SRI LANKA (1978) by the Same Author

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE GAULLIST SYSTEM in ASIA the CONSTITUTION of SRI LANKA (1978) by the Same Author THE GAULLIST SYSTEM IN ASIA THE CONSTITUTION OF SRI LANKA (1978) By the same author POLITICS IN SRI LANKA, 1947-1979 ELECTORAL POLITICS IN AN EMERGENT STATE: The Ceylon General Election of May 1970 The Gaullist System in Asia The Constitution of Sri Lanka ( 1 978) A. Jeyaratnam Wilson, PH.D., n.sc. (Econ.), London Professor and Chairman, Department of Political Science Universiry of New Brunswick formerly Professor of Political Science and Head, Department of Economics and Political Science Universiry of Sri Lanka, Peradeniya © A. Jeyaratnam Wilson 1980 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1980 1980978-0-333-27276-3 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without permission First published 1g8o by THE MACMILLAN PRESS LTD London and Basingstoke Companies and representatives throughout the world British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Wilson, Alfred Jeyaratnam The Gaullist system in Asia 1. Sri Lanka-Constitutional law I. Title 342' ·5493' 02 [Law] ISBN 978-1-349-04922-6 ISBN 978-1-349-04920-2 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-04920-2 For my elder brother Samuel Jeyasoorian Wilson, to whom I owe a debt which I can never repay Contents Acknowledgements 1x Introduction xm 1 Origins of the Gaullist System 2 The Politics of the Socio-Economic Setting I I 3 The Making of the Constitution 23 4 The Executive Presidency 43 5 The Prime Minister, Ministers, Parliament and Proportional Representation 62 6 Fundamental Liberties and the Language Question 97 7 The Judiciary; The Public Services I 24 8 Conclusion I 45 9 Postscript: Presidentialism Reassessed I 52 Bibliographical Notes I s8 Appendix I The Leading Actors I 63 Appendix II "The Second Republic- The Constitution of September I978" -A.Jeyaratnam Wilson I68 Appendix III The Constitution of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka (relevant excerpts) I 73 Notes 205 Index 2I2 VII Acknowledgements This work was conceived in Colombo, Sri Lanka, when in July of 1978 I was invited by His Excellency J. R. Jayewardene, first Elected Executive President of the Second Sri Lankan Republic, to make my comments and observations as a political scientist on the draft constitution for the proposed Second Republic. Thereafter His Excellency supplied me with information and documents, as well as giving me the benefit of his views, all of which was immensely useful to me in the preparation of this monograph. In my experience I have not come across any Head of State or Prime Minister in Sri Lanka who has been more gracious and helpful. I am also appreciative of the efforts of His Excellency's private secretary Nihal Wiratunga, who provided me with valuable material from time to time. Various ministers of the government were of great assistance; in particular, I would like to make special mention ofRonnie de Mel with whom conversation was witty and intelligent, and to the point. Lalith Athulathmudali spent long hours with me providing relevant interpretations of the Constitution. Gamini Dissanayake's. com. ments were pertinent. Sri Lanka's High Commissioner to Ottawa, my friend Ernest Corea, helped to arrange interviews for me and gave me his readings of the developing political situation. My friends in the Tamil United Liberation Front were the embodiment ofcourtesy and politeness. Appapillai Amirthalingam, Leader of the Opposition, the Subhas Chandra Bose of the Ceylon Tamils, who succeeded my father-in-law, the late S. J. V. Chelvanayakam, as the leader of nationalist-minded Sri Lankan Tamils, took great pains to present me with his viewpoint. His private secretary, R. Perinbanayagam, gave me many documents. V. Dharmalingam, the aristocratic liberal thinker of the Liberation Front, put me in touch with important sources. The wise and urbane President of the Liberation Front, M. Sivasithamparam, provided me with a penetrating analysis of the changing situation, while the sharp and incisive mind of R. Sampanthan, the member of ix X Acknowledgements Parliament for Trincomalee, articulated very clearly the goals of the Liberation Front to me. My brothers-in-law, C. Vaseekaran,J. C. Ravindran and S. C. Chandrahasan, sons of the late S. J. V. Chelvanayakam, gave me their views, the result of long years of tutelage under their great father. There are many others to whom I am much indebted. My friends were extremely helpful; namely, the historian, K. M. de Silva; the economist, H. A. de S. Gunasekera; Ian Goonetileke, the erudite chieflibrarian of the University ofPeradeniya; the Right Reverend Lakshman Wickremasinghe; and Tissa Wijeyeratne, the former diplomat, a brother of the Minister of Education and Higher Education, who has his ears close to the ground. My conversa­ tions with C. R. de Silva, W. A. Wiswa Warnapala, Ranjith Amerasinghe and Laksiri Fernando, from the Departments of History and of Political Science at the University of Peradeniya, helped me to set my views in perspective. They are friends and all of them former students. My friends Stanley Kalpage, Secretary, Ministry of Higher Education and his wife Chitrangani, W. T.Jayasinghe, Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs, and my former student, Sarath Amunugama, Secretary, Ministry of Information gave me the benefit of their experiences and supplied me with documents. So did other equally good friends- S. P. Amarasingam, the redoubtable editor of Sri Lanka's most informed and independent weekly Tribune; T. W. Rajaratnam, a fearless and upright former judge of the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka; and my friends from university days, K. H.Jayasinghe, a political scientist whose wealth of critical information was of considerable assistance; and Stanley Tillekeratne, the distinguished ex-Speaker of the National State Assembly and now one of the front line leaders of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party. One ofSri Lanka's most independent and top flight journalists, my sincere friend, M. A. de Silva, proved a constant source of encouragement and information. Two former students, Malkanthi Nanayakkara, the librarian of Marga Institute, Colombo, and S. Vamadevan, an economist, were generous in giving or mailing to me materials I needed. My family were unfailing in their patience, forbearance and friendship. My wife, Susili, my only constant friend and companion through the years, who is versed in my discipline, read my drafts, gave me hints and rendered invaluable advice. My daughters, Mallihai and Maithili, provided me with the inspiration that only Acknowledgements XI young university students looking into a bright and immediate future can give. To my little son, Kumanan, I owe many apologies. He asked me a multitude of questions when I was busy with my script and invariably received the same replies. In my work there are two persons to whom I am deeply grateful. Dr Peter G. Kepros, Dean of the Faculty of Arts, the kindliest of deans, gave me all the encouragement in the world. Mr Tim Farmiloe of Macmillan never failed me in his patience; his generosity and kindness helped me to accomplish a difficult task. Mrs Anne Pugh produced an accurate and perfect typescript of the final draft. The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada gave me the much needed financial assistance to enable me to conduct interviews, obtain information and docu­ ments in Sri Lanka, as well as to write a Postscript to this book. Above all Ms Susan Metham helped to bring out this work in good time and I am indeed grateful to her for all her efforts. Maurice and Susan Collins, Arun Datta, Vicki Gray, Andy Wood and his wife Margaret Henderson Davis gave of their warm friendship to me, l'etranger in Fredericton, New Brunswick. AJ.W. Fredericton July 1979 Introduction Political structures mean nothing unless they are goal-oriented and seek to accomplish certain defined objectives. To that extent the I948-I972 constitution let governments drift in mid-ocean, un­ anchored, rudderless and with no seemingly charted destination. The constitution of the First Republic in its brief existence of a little more than five years (I 972-I 977) provided evidence of a search for a kind of socialism which was neither here nor there, the result of weak compromises borne out of the conflicts and rivalries of social democrats, Sinhalese Buddhist ethnic militants and Marxists. It foundered in its own morass of incompetence, corruption and intrigue. The Second Republic of I978 is more definitive and provides evidence of a conviction ofwhat needs to be done. It is a hybrid, a cross between the French and British styles of government with a little bit of the United States thrown in. More importantly it is a strained effort in the direction of developmental depoliticised government, the prime purpose being to promote economic growth and national unity. There is a deliberate attempt to avoid copying either the "repressive developmentalist regimes" 1 characteristic of the Shah's Iran, South Korea, Indonesia, the Philippines and Singapore or the centralised and excessively depoliticised struc­ tures2 in the countries of the neighbouring subcontinent. Thus the principal delineating feature in Sri Lanka's case is the hankering after democratic constitutional government. Behind the facade however is the harbinger of political authoritarianism and firm streamlined bureaucratic performance. Only time can tell whether the delicately poised system can weather the storms ofstreet battles, trade union struggles, student unrest, ethnic rebellion from the Ceylon Tamil minority which nurses a strong sense ofgrievance and retaliation from the forces of majoritarian ethnocentric Sinhalese nationalism. The Second Republic is vice-regal in character. Members of the Cabinet are the Executive President's lieutenants, not his col­ leagues. It is an attempt at experimentation with pseudo- xiii XIV Introduction representative devices- proportional representation, the parapher­ nalia of referenda, a plebiscitary presidential election, the mainten­ ance of Parliament, though as the house without windows.
Recommended publications
  • Reforming Sri Lankan Presidentialism: Provenance, Problems and Prospects Volume 2
    Reforming Sri Lankan Presidentialism: Provenance, Problems and Prospects Edited by Asanga Welikala Volume 2 18 Failure of Quasi-Gaullist Presidentialism in Sri Lanka Suri Ratnapala Constitutional Choices Sri Lanka’s Constitution combines a presidential system selectively borrowed from the Gaullist Constitution of France with a system of proportional representation in Parliament. The scheme of proportional representation replaced the ‘first past the post’ elections of the independence constitution and of the first republican constitution of 1972. It is strongly favoured by minority parties and several minor parties that owe their very existence to proportional representation. The elective executive presidency, at least initially, enjoyed substantial minority support as the president is directly elected by a national electorate, making it hard for a candidate to win without minority support. (Sri Lanka’s ethnic minorities constitute about 25 per cent of the population.) However, there is a growing national consensus that the quasi-Gaullist experiment has failed. All major political parties have called for its replacement while in opposition although in government, they are invariably seduced to silence by the fruits of office. Assuming that there is political will and ability to change the system, what alternative model should the nation embrace? Constitutions of nations in the modern era tend fall into four categories. 1.! Various forms of authoritarian government. These include absolute monarchies (emirates and sultanates of the Islamic world), personal dictatorships, oligarchies, theocracies (Iran) and single party rule (remaining real or nominal communist states). 2.! Parliamentary government based on the Westminster system with a largely ceremonial constitutional monarch or president. Most Western European countries, India, Japan, Israel and many former British colonies have this model with local variations.
    [Show full text]
  • Tides of Violence: Mapping the Sri Lankan Conflict from 1983 to 2009 About the Public Interest Advocacy Centre
    Tides of violence: mapping the Sri Lankan conflict from 1983 to 2009 About the Public Interest Advocacy Centre The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) is an independent, non-profit legal centre based in Sydney. Established in 1982, PIAC tackles barriers to justice and fairness experienced by people who are vulnerable or facing disadvantage. We ensure basic rights are enjoyed across the community through legal assistance and strategic litigation, public policy development, communication and training. 2nd edition May 2019 Contact: Public Interest Advocacy Centre Level 5, 175 Liverpool St Sydney NSW 2000 Website: www.piac.asn.au Public Interest Advocacy Centre @PIACnews The Public Interest Advocacy Centre office is located on the land of the Gadigal of the Eora Nation. TIDES OF VIOLENCE: MAPPING THE SRI LANKAN CONFLICT FROM 1983 TO 2009 03 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 09 Background to CMAP .............................................................................................................................................09 Report overview .......................................................................................................................................................09 Key violation patterns in each time period ......................................................................................................09 24 July 1983 – 28 July 1987 .................................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • The Israeli-Sri Lankan Relationship
    The Israeli-Sri Lankan Relationship by Punsara Amarasinghe BESA Center Perspectives Paper No. 1,962, March 12, 2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Following Indian premier Narendra Singh Modi’s historic visit to Israel in 2017, bilateral relations between India and Israel were elevated into a strategic partnership. But this was not Israel’s first successful diplomatic venture in South Asia. India’s tiny neighbor, Sri Lanka, had a strategic alliance with Israel long before India developed one. During the Cold War era, Sri Lanka was viewed as an Israeli success story in the region. Jewish relations with Sri Lanka have a long history that dates all the way back to the biblical epoch: the Sri Lankan city of Galle is said to be the city of Tarshish, to which King Solomon sent merchant ships. Beyond the biblical legacy, the Jewish presence in the island nation thrived under British rule, as many European Jews held prominent positions in the colonial administration. In the early stage of British rule, then Chief Justice of Sri Lanka Sir Alexander Johnston proposed the establishment of a Jewish settlement on the island, an idea that was not taken up by the colonial office in London. Both Israel and Sri Lanka became independent states in 1948. At Israel’s inception, it faced diplomatic hostility from the Arab world, and many post-colonial countries—including India—refused to recognize it as an independent state. But Sri Lanka’s first PM, D.S. Senanayake, initiated the island nation’s cooperation with Israel, despite the disapproval of many Asian and African states.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Violent Tamil Insurrection in Sri Lanka, 1972-1987
    SECESSIONIST GUERRILLAS: A STUDY OF VIOLENT TAMIL INSURRECTION IN SRI LANKA, 1972-1987 by SANTHANAM RAVINDRAN B.A., University Of Peradeniya, 1981 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department of Political Science We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA February 1988 @ Santhanam Ravindran, 1988 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of Political Science The University of British Columbia 1956 Main Mall Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Y3 Date February 29, 1988 DE-6G/81) ABSTRACT In Sri Lanka, the Tamils' demand for a federal state has turned within a quarter of a century into a demand for the independent state of Eelam. Forces of secession set in motion by emerging Sinhala-Buddhist chauvinism and the resultant Tamil nationalism gathered momentum during the 1970s and 1980s which threatened the political integration of the island. Today Indian intervention has temporarily arrested the process of disintegration. But post-October 1987 developments illustrate that the secessionist war is far from over and secession still remains a real possibility.
    [Show full text]
  • News Round Up
    NEWS ROUND UP Tuesday, February 05, 2019 Contents President raps politicians for country’s paralysis ......................................................................................... 2 Fraudulent ATM skimming: Industry says situation under control but urges vigilance ............................... 3 SL draws record $ 2.3 b FDI in 2018, eyes $ 3 b this year despite political challenges: Malik ..................... 4 Malik welcomes Dubai’s Essar for Rs. 30 b mixed development PPP in Battaramulla ................................. 5 US says eager to build on partnership with Sri Lanka .................................................................................. 6 Piramal Glass laments Govt. failure to reduce furnace oil prices ................................................................. 6 Who is fooling whom with another draft national maritime and logistics policy? ...................................... 7 Taprobane Securities (Pvt) Ltd – Research + 94 11 5328200 [email protected] President raps politicians for country’s paralysis President Maithripala Sirisena yesterday during his Independence Day address made a string of political and economic observations focusing on development, fighting corruption, holding provincial council elections and criticised actions during the recent Constitutional crisis and moves by the United National Party (UNP) to establish a National Government. Delivering his address to the nation to mark the 71st Independence Day, Sirisena took on several key issues and made fresh observations on
    [Show full text]
  • B. Sirisena Cooray Tissa Dias Bandaranayake and Two
    SC B. Sirisena Cooray v. Tissa Dias Bandaranayake and Two Others 1 B. SIRISENA COORAY v. TISSA DIAS BANDARANAYAKE AND TWO OTHERS SUPREME COURT DHEERARATNE, J., GUNAWARDANA, J. AND WEERASEKERA, J. S.C. SPECIAL (WRIT) NO. 1/98 NOVEMBER 18, AND 19, 1998. DECEMBER 18, 1998 JANUARY 8, 21, 1999 Writ of Certiorari - Report of a Commission of Inquiry under the Special Presidential Commission of Inquiry Law - Liability for contempt of the Commission - Scope of. the writ jurisdiction of the Supreme Court - Amenability of the Commission's report to judicial review — Special Presidential Commissions of Inquiry Law, No. 7 of 1978, sections 2, 7, 9, 11, 12, 16 and 18A o f the Law - Articles 13 (3), 81, 89, 91 and 140 of the Constitution - Section 22 o f the Interpretation Ordinance. The President issued a warrant under the Special Presidential Commissions of Inquiry Law, No. 7 of 1978 as amended appointing the 1st respondent and two others as Commissioners to inquire into and report on matters specified in the warrant relating to the assassination of late Lalith William Athulathmudali. The other two Commissioners resigned and the 2nd respondent was appointed as a Commissioner. On 12. 07. 1996 acting in terms of section 16 of the Law, the Commission informed the petitioner that it was of the opinion that he was a person whose conduct should be subject to inquiry and that he was entitled to legal representation. He was not informed of the date of the inquiry. At the time of that notice the petitioner had left for the USA.
    [Show full text]
  • In Memoriam Dr. Chanaka Amaratunga
    GROUNDVIEWS Groundviews is Sri Lanka's first and international award- winning citizens journalism website. The legacy of Chanaka Amaratunga and the future of liberalism in Sri Lanka The 19th of April was the 52nd birthday of Dr. Chanaka Amaratunga, the founder of the Liberal Party of Sri Lanka. Groundviews invited leading political commentators to contribute to a special edition commemorating Chanaka's role in politics and the liberal movement in Sri Lanka. Featuring contributions by: Dr. Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu, Executive Director, Centre for Policy Alternatives Tissa Jayatilaka, Executive Director, United States-Sri Lanka Fulbright Commission Dr. Devanesan Nesiah, a former Jaffna Government Agent Dr. Dayan Jayatilleka, Visiting Senior Research Fellow, Institute of South Asian Studies, National University of Singapore Publius 1 Remembering Chanaka By Dr. Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu The idea of liberalism in Sri Lankan politics out, was that whilst he was certain and is intimately associated with the life and confident about ideas he was more curious writings of the leader and founder of the than confident about judging character and Liberal Party, Dr Chanaka Amaratunga. He people. Especially endearing personal April 2010 passionately believed in the liberal idea, qualities of Chanaka were his generosity and hoped fervently that it would inspire the body his love of being teased – which he was politic and be integrated into it and the endlessly by all of us who were his friends. VIEWS political culture of Sri Lanka. His all too He adored the attention and lapped up the brief life prevented him from realizing this affection. and from resisting as formidably as he could the equally passionate anti liberal forces and It is difficult to disentangle the personal from GROUND their opportunistic apparatchiks from the political, the Chanaka I knew as my oldest enshrining a narrow, populist nationalism as friend and the Chanaka I knew as the the conventional orthodoxy of the day.
    [Show full text]
  • The Judiciary Under the 1978 Constitution
    3 The Judiciary under the 1978 Constitution Nihal Jayawickrama The judiciary under the 1978 Constitution has to be assessed by reference to the constitutional framework within which it functioned, the period that preceded it, and the contemporary international standards. This chapter focuses on the superior courts of Sri Lanka; in particular, the Supreme Court. Judicial Independence At the core of the concept of judicial independence is the theory of the separation of powers: the judiciary, one of three basic and equal pillars in the modern democratic State, should function independently of the other two, the executive and the legislature. This is necessary because of the judiciary’s important role in relation to the other two branches. It ensures that the government and the administration are held to account for their actions. It ensures that laws are duly enacted by the legislature in conformity with the national constitution and, where appropriate, with regional and international treaties that form part of national law. To fulfil this role, and to ensure a completely free and unfettered exercise of its independent legal judgment, the judiciary must be free from inappropriate connections with, and influences by, the other two branches of government. Judicial independence thus serves as the guarantee of impartiality, and is a fundamental precondition for judicial integrity. It is, in essence, the right enjoyed by people when they invoke the jurisdiction of the courts seeking and expecting justice. It is a pre-requisite to the rule of law, and a fundamental guarantee of a fair trial. It is not a privilege accorded to the judiciary, or enjoyed by judges.
    [Show full text]
  • Commission of Inquiry to Investigate the Involuntary Removal Or Disappearances of Persons in the Western, Southern and Sabaragamuwa Provinces As Well As Mr M.C.M
    In exploring what constitutes a veritable minefield of contentious information in the current context in Sri Lanka, the author is indebted to Dr J. de Almeida Guneratne P.C., former Commissioner, 1994 Presidential Commission of Inquiry to Investigate the Involuntary Removal or Disappearances of Persons in the Western, Southern and Sabaragamuwa Provinces as well as Mr M.C.M. Iqbal, former Secretary to two Presidential Commissions of Inquiry into Involuntary Removal or Disappearances of Persons, with whom the perspectives of this research were shared. Research assistance was rendered by attorneys-at-law Prameetha Abeywickrema and Palitha de Silva, who also conducted interviews relevant to the analysis. Roger Normand, John Tyynela and Ian Seiderman of ICJ edited the report and provided invaluable substantive input and constant encouragement, which is deeply appreciated. 1 # & !& 0, ! &!&$!%% 07 1, $ + '$&+ %'$% 20 2, !!& '$+ 22 8060 #%##$#())*)$# 89 8070 '()%*!#$#())*)$#$6><7 8; 8080 $#%*!#$#())*)$#$6><= 8; 8090 ')(.)$*')$%%! 9; #" 0, $% & '$%)+% 41 1, "&+% 43 2, )!!& % 44 3, $!%'&! %& &!*'! ! & 46 9060 '"!)( := 9070 ##'$"#%( := 9080 (($ (( !!#($+!#( :> 90806 *"'%*'"( ;5 908070 "!""( ;6 908080 .!#)#( ;6 9090 ""#( ;6 90:0 '*(*+!( ;7 90;0 $!$ $(( ;8 90<0 #*#*,,( ;8 !'%%" ! $# 0, $!' 54 1, $-0883!%%! %! #'$+ 56 7060 #($#$""(($# ;< 7070 #&*'.#)$)) $# !3!"%1 '#$ #&*'.4 <6 7080 $ $!$""(($#$ #&*'. <8 7090 6>>61>8'(#)!$""(($#(36>>616>>84 <; 70:0 !)$#($#)6>>6'(#)!$""(($#( << 2, !%&-0883!%%! %! #'$+ &!%"$%""$
    [Show full text]
  • Representations of Mass Atrocity in Sri Lanka: Challenges to Justice and Recovery
    Representations of Mass Atrocity in Sri Lanka: Challenges to Justice and Recovery Introduction Within the legal framework of international law, the representation of mass atrocity is expressed through the categories of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. However, these conceptual categories are applied within particular political and ideological fields that must be critiqued in order to reach an inclusive representation of truth about mass atrocity. The focus of this paper will be on the representations of mass atrocity in Sri Lanka, and will demonstrate that ideology has determined how truth is perceived, and how justice and recovery are envisaged. Approaching this task through a hermeneutic of suspicion allows a more accurate representation to emerge within the political imagination, and indicates more comprehensive justice and recovery measures to be pursued. Death beyond Reckoning... According to UN sources, at least 40,000 Tamil civilians were killed in the final phase of the war, lasting just four months (January through May of 2009).1 Giving testimony at the Government of Sri Lanka (GoSL)-appointed Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) on 11 January, 2011, the Bishop of Manner revealed that there are still 1,46,679 Tamils unaccounted for, a figure he arrived at by analysing official data issued by the GoSL2. How can the truth about such shocking loss of life, such a staggering number of deaths, best be represented in the political imagination? International law provides conceptual and legal categories, including war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. The representation of mass atrocity in Sri Lanka within these categories will determine what measures are deemed necessary in terms of justice and recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • GAMINI DISSANAYAKE (PETITIONER in SC 4/91) V. MCM KALEEL and OTHERS
    sc Gamini Dissanayake v. M. C. M. Kaleel and Others 135 GAMINI DISSANAYAKE (PETITIONER IN SC 4/91) v. M. C. M. KALEEL AND OTHERS (Note : Similar applications in Cases Bearing No. 5/91, No. 6/91, No. 7/91, No. 8/91 and 9/91, No. 10/91, No. 11/91 were heard together and disposed of in one judgment). SUPREME COURT. FERNANDO, J. KULATUNGA, J. AND WADUGODAPITIYA, J. S.C. (Special). No. 4 - 11/91. OCTOBER 31 AND NOVEMBER 1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12 AND 13, 1991. Article 99 (13) (a) of the Constitution - Notice of resolution to impeach the President - Speaker's notification to President of entertaining resolution [Article 38 (2) (a) and (b)] - Vote of confidence in President by Cabinet Members - Inconsistency of expulsion with the provisions of the Constitution and Statute Law - Jurisdiction of Working Committee of U.N.P. - Position of an MP vis-a-vis his Party - Signing notice of resolution to remove the President and agitation for constitutional changes - Failure to initiate prior internal discussion - Causing insult and injury to the President - Deceiving the Cabinet - Breach of rules of natural justice - Audi alteram partem - Bias - Mala tides. Eight Members of the United National Party who were also members of Parliament singly filed eight petitions bearing numbers SC 4 - 11/91 challenging their expulsion from the Party. The respective petitioners in applications No. SC 5/91 and No. SC 8/91 were Ministers of Cabinet rank in the UNP government shortly before their expulsion. The petitioner in application No. SC 9/91 and the petitioner in application No.
    [Show full text]
  • Jkpo;J; Njrpa Mtzr; Rtbfs;
    Pirapaharan Chapter 35<br>Tamil Blood Boils - Sangam.org Page 1 of 7 www.tamilarangam.net Sangam.org - Ilankai Tamil Sangam Association of Tamils of Sri Lanka in the USA Active Home Page Previous Version Archive Original Version Home Page Pirapaharan Chapter 35 Tamil Blood Boils by T. Sabaratnam; published March 31, 2004 35: Tamil Blood Boils Eyewitness Account I was in Trincomalee on 27 November 1982 with Daily News presidential reporter Norton Weerasinghe and photographer Sena Vithanagama to cover the foundation-laying function of the Mitsui Cement Factory the next morning. We met Trincomalee Member of Parliament Rajavarothayam Sampanthan at his home on 28 November morning to arrange the use of his telephone to send the report of the event to the Daily News. Obtaining telephone calls from provincial towns was difficult those days and only a few top government officials, police, commanding officers of armed services and parliamentarians enjoyed a direct dialing facility. Others had to go through the telephone exchange, which meant several hours of waiting. Peter Balasooriya of The Sunday Island had made arrangements with the Trincomalee Government Agent, Jayatissa Bandaragoda, one of his important contacts, thus forcing us to make an alternative arrangement. Sampanthan had just returned from a meeting with President Jayewardene who had come to lay the foundation stone when we met him. “I thanked him for canceling the Cadju Plantation Project and briefed him about a plot to eject the poor Indian Tamils settled by Gandhyam in Vavuniya, Trincomalee and Batticoloa. The President was very accommodative,” he said. Sampanthan also told us his worry about moves by Cyril Mathew and Gamini Dissanayake to convert Trincomalee into a Sinhala-majority province.
    [Show full text]