DOCSLIB.ORG

Download This

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download This NPSForm 10-900 OMBNo. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior iiVEO 2280 National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form MAT REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES NM NATIONAL PARK SERVICE __ This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Conner Street Historic District other names/site number OS7-464--39001-071 2. Location Street & number Roughly hnth sides nf T,ngan and Conner Streets between 1flth and 17th N/A D not for publication City Or town Nnhlesville___________________________________ -N/A p vicinity state Indiana______ code IN___ county Hamilton______ code Hf zip code 46060 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this H nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property H meets D does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant D nationally D st§JeWl3e)H locally. ( D See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature ofcertifyjng official/Title Date Indian/ Department of Natural Resources State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property D meets D does not meet the National Register criteria. ( D See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of certifying official/Title Date State or Federal agency and bureau 4. National Park Service Certification herebVcertify that the property is: Date of Action IV entered in the National Register. n See continuation sheet. Q determined eligible for the National Register Q See continuation sheet. Q determined not eligible for the National Register D removed from the National Register D other, (explain:) _________ Name of Property__ ... County and State 5. Classification 6£> Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property (Check as many boxes aft^fily) (Check only one box) (Do not include previously listed resources in the count £3 private 1 D building Contributing Noncontributing D publicrlqcal " ' K] district 146 29 buildings D public-Federal " D structure 0 Q sites D object 0 Q structures 0 Q objects 146 29 Total Name of related multiple property listing Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing.) N/A 3 6. Function or Use Historic Functions Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) DOMESTIC: Single Dwelling DOMESTIC: Singleo Dwellingu DOMESTIC: Multiple Dwelling DOMESTIC: Multiple Dwelling X «—' DOMESTIC: Secondary Structure DOMESTIC: Secondary Structure RELIGION: Religious Facility COMMERCE/TR ADE: Rusiness EDUCATION: School COMMERCE/TRADE: Professional COMMERCE/TRADE: Specialty Store COMMERCE/TRADE: Specialty Store FUNERARY: MortuaryJ 7. Description Architectural Classification Materials (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) LATE VICTORIAN: Queen Anne foundation RRTCK LATE VICTORIAN: Ttalianate 1 9th & 20th c. REVIVALS : Colonial Revival walls RRTCK 19th & 20th c. REVIVALS : Classical Revival WOOD: Weatherboard 1 9th & 20th c.AMER.: Rungal ow/Craftsman roof ASPHALT other STONE RRTCK Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) Conner Street Historic District Hamilton IN Name of Property County and State 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria Areas of Significance (Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property (Enter categories from instructions) for National Register listing.) ARr.HTTF.f!TURF.______ [X] A Property is associated with events that have made COMMUNITY PLANNING & a significant contriibution to the broad patterns of our history. SOCT AT, HISTORY Q B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. ^ C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components Period of Significance lack individual distinction. 1840-1Q47________ I—I Property has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Significant Dates Criteria Considerations (Mark "x" in all the boxes that apply.) Property is: Q A owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. Significant Person (Complete if Criterion B is marked above) D B removed from its original location. G C a birthplace or grave. Cultural Affiliation D D a cemetery. D E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. D F a commemorative property. 'ess than 50 years of age or achieved significance within the past 50 years. Architect/Builder unknown_____ Sears and Roehnck Narrative Statement of Significance (Explain the significance of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) 9. Major Biblioqraphic References Bibliography (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets.) Previous documentation on file (NPS): Primary location of additional data: D preliminary determination of individual listing (36 £3 State Historic Preservation Office CFR 67) has been requested D previously listed in the National Register D Other State agency D previously determined eligible by the National D Federal agency Register D Local government D designated a National Historic Landmark D University D recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey # _______________ D Other D recorded by Historic American Engineering Record # ______________ Name of repository: Indiana Historic Sites and Structures Snrvey Conner Street Historic District Hamilton IN Name of Property County and State 10. Geographical Data Acreage of Property 35 acres UTM References (Place additional UTM references on a continuation sheet.) S8ft|2|0p Zone Easting Northing 815 |op p 4|43|3|0|4p 16 5 2 See continuation sheet Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries of the property on a continuation sheet.) Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected on a continuation sheet.) 11. Form Prepared By name/title Ann Schweikert-Histnrir Preservation Consultant organization Nnhlesville Preservation AUiqnce date 3-17-98 street & number 17456 Trailview Circle telephone 117/776-1239 City or town Nnhlesville state zip code 46060 Additional Documentation Submit the following items with the completed form: Continuation Sheets Maps A USGS map (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location. A Sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. Photographs Representative black and white photographs of the property. Additional items (Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional items) Property Owner (Complete this item at the request of SHPO or FPO.) name street & number telephone city or town state zip code Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 etseq.). Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 18.1 hours per response including time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the Chief, Administrative Services Division, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, DC 20013-7127; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductions Projects (1024-0018), Washington, DC 20503. NPS Form 10-900-a OMB No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Section number 7 Page _1 Conner Street Historic District Hamilton County, Indiana 7. Narrative Description The Conner Street Historic District is a residential district located along two major east/west streets in Noblesville. Comprising a wide range of styles, materials, shapes and sizes, it depicts both affluent and middle class families in Noblesville's history. The district contains a mix of styles including Gothic Revival, Queen Anne, Colonial Revival, and Craftsman. The district also contains non-contributing ranch style homes constructed after
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In Search of the Indiana Lenape
    IN SEARCH OF THE INDIANA LENAPE: A PREDICTIVE SUMMARY OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT OF THE LENAPE LIVING ALONG THE WHITE RIVER IN INDIANA FROM 1790 - 1821 A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS BY JESSICA L. YANN DR. RONALD HICKS, CHAIR BALL STATE UNIVERSITY MUNCIE, INDIANA DECEMBER 2009 Table of Contents Figures and Tables ........................................................................................................................ iii Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 Research Goals ............................................................................................................................ 1 Background .................................................................................................................................. 2 Chapter 2: Theory and Methods ................................................................................................. 6 Explaining Contact and Its Material Remains ............................................................................. 6 Predicting the Intensity of Change and its Effects on Identity................................................... 14 Change and the Lenape .............................................................................................................. 16 Methods ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • White River Vision Plan Transition Team Submitted Written Briefs Activation/Economy Stakeholders
    White River Vision Plan Transition Team Submitted Written Briefs Activation/Economy Stakeholders The White River Vision Plan Transition Team is appointed and charged with serving as the civic trust to create the regional governance implementation strategy for the White River Vision Plan. The White River Vision Plan Transition Team consists of balanced representatives from both Marion and Hamilton Counties with governance, organizational development, fundraising, and political experience. As part of the Team process, three sets of representative stakeholders, organized around the Vision Plan’s guiding principle groupings of environment, activation/economy, and regional/community/equity, are invited to submit written testimony to guide the Team’s discussions. Included in this packet are responses received from the activation & economy stakeholders. • Norman Burns, Conner Prairie • Ginger Davis, Hamilton County Soil & Water Conservation District • Patrick Flaherty, Indianapolis Arts Center • Greg Harger, Reconnecting to Our Waterways White River Committee • Amy Marisavljevic, Indiana DNR • Sarah Reed, City of Noblesville • Michael Strohl, Citizens Energy Group • Kenton Ward, Hamilton County Surveyor • Jonathan Wright, Newfields • Staff, Hamilton County Parks & Recreation Additional organizations were also invited to submit written briefs but opted not to respond. Response from Norman Burns Conner Prairie WRVP Transition Team: Regional Governance Model Questionnaire Please limit your response to four pages total. Responses will be public. Briefly describe your organization or interest, its relationship to the White River, and its primary geographic area of interest. Conner Prairie is a unique historic place that inspires curiosity and fosters learning by providing engaging and individualized experiences for everyone. Located on the White River in Hamilton County Indiana, the William Conner story, and the Indiana story, are intertwined and continues to be told and interpreted at Conner Prairie.
    [Show full text]
  • LENAPE VILLAGES of DELAWARE COUNTY By: Chris Flook
    LENAPE VILLAGES OF DELAWARE COUNTY By: Chris Flook After the signing of the Treaty of Greenville in 1795, many bands of Lenape (Delaware) Native Americans found themselves without a place to live. During the previous 200 years, the Lenape had been pushed west from their ancestral homelands in what we now call the Hudson and Delaware river valleys ­ first into the Pennsylvania Colony in the mid­1700s and then into the Ohio Country around the time of the American Revolution. After the Revolution, many Natives living in what the new American government quickly carved out to be the Northwest Territory, were alarmed of the growing encroachment from white settlers. In response, numerous Native groups across the territory formed the pan­tribal Western Confederacy in an attempt to block white settlement and to retain Native territory. The Western Confederacy consisted of warriors from approximately forty different tribes, although in many cases, an entire tribe wasn’t involved, demonstrating the complexity and decentralized nature of Native American political alliances at this time. Several war chiefs led the Western Confederacy’s military efforts including the Miami chief Mihšihkinaahkwa (Little Turtle), the Shawnee chief Weyapiersenwah (Blue Jacket), the Ottawa chief Egushawa, and the Lenape chief Buckongahelas. The Western Confederacy delivered a series of stunning victories over American forces in 1790 and 1791 including the defeat of Colonel Hardin’s forces at the Battle of Heller’s Corner on October 19, 1790; Hartshorn’s Defeat on the following day; and the Battle of Pumpkin Fields on October 21. On November 4 1791, the forces of the territorial governor General Arthur St.
    [Show full text]
  • Treaties of St Marys
    Anatomy of The 1818 Treaties of St. Marys; Their Impact on the Miami, Delaware, New York Tribes and Indiana By A. Andrew Olson III, December 20, 2011; © A A Olson, 2011 With the end of the American Revolution and subsequent signing of the Northwest Ordinance in 1787, a flood of pioneer families streamed across the Appalachian Mountains to the newly organizing lands just beyond to the West. Fledgling territorial government officials, driven in part by a tidal wave of white migration, sought increasing amounts of land from Native Tribes – some of which had already been imposed upon with regularity by the new American Nation. As populations in the eastern portions of the Northwest Territory reached threshold levels, the new states of Ohio and Indiana had been admitted into the Union by the end of 1816. None-the-less, vast portions of these new states remained in the hands of Native Tribes. To rectify this situation, a series of pivotally important treaties were authorized in 1817 and 1818. In the fall of 1818 alone six separate treaties were completed at St. Marys, Ohio between the US Government and the Wyandot, Seneca, Shawnese and Ottawas (September 17th), with the Wyandot (September 20th), the Potawatomi (October 2nd), the Wea (October 2nd), the Delaware (October 3rd) and the Miami (October 6th).1 These treaties brought vast amounts of land under control of the US and by reference Ohio and Indiana, ushering in the dramatic settlement and expansion of Indiana in particular. The negotiations resulted in wholesale removal of the Delaware from Indiana, substantially prevented the planned migration and settlement of the Brothertown and Stockbridge in Indiana, and set the future direction for the displacement of the Miami from their Indiana homeland.
    [Show full text]
  • William Conner
    The Life Of William Conner Timothy Crumrin William Conner lived his life in two different worlds. He lived and dressed both as a white settler and as a Native American. Because he lived as both a White man and an American Indian, William Conner understood the two different ways of life and how they affected each other. William was born near Lichtenau, Ohio in 1777, to parents Richard and Margaret Conner. His father was a trader and tavern keeper. They lived with Moravians in Schoenbrunn, Ohio. Moravians were missionaries among the Delaware Indians. The Conners traveled William Conner with them to Michigan where William grew up. Then the Moravians and Delaware decided to return to Ohio. Richard Conner and his family stayed in Michigan. He established a trading post and helped others settle in the area. By 1795, at only eighteen years old, William was trading with the Native Americans in Michigan. In the winter of 1800-1801, William and his brother John came to Indiana to become fur traders. SETTLING IN Both men settled among the Delaware and married Delaware women. According to legend, William's wife, Mekinges, was the daughter of Chief Anderson, but no one can be certain. Traders often found it helpful to marry into the tribes they traded with. For Conner, it gave him more power and control over the tribe’s actions. It also meant that the other Delawares trusted him more. Like Conner, traders often became the link between Indians and the white world. William Conner built a log home and a trading post.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Images of Lenape People
    EARLY IMAGES OF LENAPE PEOPLE Note: We will be adding additional images and information in the future. Lenape unloading a canoe at a village. The Indians who lived here call themselves Lenape. The land formerly occupied by all of these native people is now New Jersey Eastern New York State Western Long Island eastern Pennsylvania and northern Delaware. It is also known as Lenapehòking - the land of the Lenape. Drawing by Herbert and John Kraft This drawing shows Lenape people when one of the first Europeans along the East Coast saw the Indians in 1524. Their clothing was simple - the men were breechcloth and moccasins, with a robe to cover themselves in cold weather. Women had knee length skirts and wore fur robes in winter, or a beautiful mantel made out from turkey feathers. Ornaments are bone, shell and wampum, and were sometimes worn on necklaces, or and wrists and ankles. Giovanni da Verrazano wrote, “These people are the most beautiful and have the most civil customs that we have found on this voyage. They Drawing by Herbert and John Kraft are taller than we are, they are a bronze color, some tending more towards whiteness, others a tawny color; the face is clean cut, the hair is long, and their manner is sweet and gentle, very much like that of the ancients. They have all the proportions belonging to any well-built men. Their women are just as shapely and beautiful; very gracious, of attractive manner and pleasant appearance.” This illustration shows the Dutch, Swedish, and English explorers, settlers and traders who changed the lives the Indians in many ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Standard Guest
    HELPFUL TIPS AND INFORMATION DAILY SCHEDULE • Guests under the age of 16 must be accompanied by an adult at all Lenape Indian Camp times. • Ongoing: See demonstrations of various historic skills. • Strollers and Wagons are now available for rental during your visit. $5 each. William Conner House • Please keep food in designated areas. The Designated Picnic area is • Ongoing: Explore the lives of the Conner family and find out how available on a first come-first served basis for lunches brought from their story mirrors Indiana’s transition from territory to state. home. Animal Encounters at the Golden Eagle Inn • Watch for bumpy roads and paths in the historic areas. • Ongoing: Animal display and care • You may take pictures on your visit, but for personal use only. No tripods please. Prairietown • Ongoing: Step into a day in the life of 1836 • Wheelchairs and Accessibility Maps are available in the Welcome Center at the Ticket Desk. 1863 Civil War Journey • No weapons allowed on the property. • Ongoing: Talk with soldiers and civilians about their • Conner Prairie is smoke-free (this includes e-cigarettes). Thank you perspectives on the war. for not smoking/vaping. 1859 Balloon Voyage • Conner Prairie staff may take photos of you for promotional use. If • Learn more about early ballooning in our “Lighter than Air” you’re camera shy, please ask for a special sticker at the Ticket Desk exhibit and take a ride on the brand new 1859 Balloon Voyage. so our photographer knows not to photograph you. Covid -19 procedures Exploring Conner Prairie grounds with your safety in mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Identified the Future Site of Indianapolis As the New State Capital
    + © Copyright Indiana Historical Bureau 1996 + The Indiana Historian, March 1996 1 + The 175th anniversary of the two journals describing the founding of Indiana’s capital city commissioners’ activities are Focus is the impetus for a two-part excerpted. examination of how Indianapolis The report of the commis- came to be. Part 2 will be in the sioners and the General June 1996 issue. Assembly’s acceptance of that Indianapolis was created by report are the focus of pages 12- law to be the permanent seat of 13. Included is a summary of the government for the state. The interesting law that moved the legislative process of locating and process forward to plat and establishing the capital city was establish Indianapolis. The Indiana Historian March 1996 complex. The documentary evi- On page 14, some back- ISSN 1071-3301 Editor dence of that process—sampled in ground of how Indianapolis was Pamela J. Bennett this issue—provides an example named is provided. Lead Researcher Paula A. Bongen of how government works. It also As usual, selected resources Designer Dani B. Pfaff provides a fascinating picture of are provided on page 15. Contributing Editors life in Indiana in 1820-1821. Carole M. Allen, Janine Beckley, Alan Conant, Dani B. Pfaff, On page 3, a quotation and a You Be the Historian Virginia Terpening map provide an interesting over- The Indiana Historian provides re- • How and why was your town es- sources and models for the study of local view of the capitals of the area history to encourage Indiana’s citizens of which became Indiana.
    [Show full text]
  • The White River Vision Plan Is a Community-Driven Process in Indianapolis and Hamilton County to Develop a Holistic Vision and C
    welcome! Our first White River Vision Plan community open house The White River Vision Plan is a community-driven process in Indianapolis and Hamilton County to develop a holistic vision and comprehensive plan that explores the enormous potential of our river to enhance regional vibrancy, ecological integrity, livability and economic vitality. The White River Vision Plan is a joint effort between the City of Indianapolis and Hamilton County Tourism, Inc. in partnership with Visit Indy’s philanthropic arm, Tourism Tomorrow, Inc. The Vision Plan would not be possible without the concerted efforts of our shareholder partners, the White River Alliance, Friends of the White River, and Reconnecting Our Waterways. Our study area Hamilton County and Indianapolis Why plan regionally? The Central Indiana White River study area is one mile wide US - 31 and extends for 58 miles from Lafayette Trace Park in Hamilton CLARE County to Southwestway Park in Indianapolis. Between these parks, STRAWTOWN two counties and multiple cities, NORTH NOBLESVILLE neighborhoods, tributaries and major infrastructure systems lie US - 38 alongside the White River. This plan is an opportunity to better connect all of these individual US - 32 NOBLESVILLE elements together through the power of a river vision, creating a region that is stronger than the RIVER ROAD sum of its parts. I - 69 CARMEL FISHERS US - 31 ELLER ROAD KEYSTONE AT THE CROSSING NORTH CENTRAL CASTLETON MERIDIAN HILLS/ WILLIAMS CREEK CLEARWATER I - 465 ALLISONVILLE RAVENSWOOD DELAWARE TRAILS GLENDALE BROAD
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science
    Thomas Dean and the Delaware Towns Paul Week, Indiana Historical Society The journey of Thomas Dean (1) from Deansboro, New York, to the Delaware Towns on White river in central Indiana during the sum- mer of 1817 definitely indicates that Chief Anderson was at that time the principal chief of the Delawares in the White river country, and that his seat of residence at Anderson's Town (now Anderson, Indiana) was the seat of government and principal Delaware Indian town. From other sources we had come to the conclusion that the two most eastern towns on White river had been abandoned prior to the year of 1820. Dean's journal strengthens that conclusion. By letter dated Paris, N. Y., May 12, 1817, Asabel Curtiss Doolittle and Joseph Stebbins, Superintendents of Indian Affairs, wrote to "The Honourable Governor Of Indiana Territory and to the Agents of the several Tribes of Indians in said Territory, Gentlemen : Having been informed that a certain tribe of Indians residing near White River in your Territory have proposed to grant to the New Stockbridge and Brothertown Indians, who now reside in the Counties of Oneida and Madison in New York State, a certain tract of land upon certain conditions, We therefore, as Superintendents of the said New Stockbridge and Brotherton Indians, beg leave to represent that they are now about to set out on a journey to that country to accomplish that business, and that they have agreed with Mr. Thomas Dean, an inhabitant of the County of Oneida, to accompany them and to be their agent to negotiate with said Indians, or their agents in your Territory, and as we are personally acquainted with Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Americans in Muncie (Pdf)
    NATIVE AMERICANS in DEL. CO. - Pre-Contact - Archaeological Record - Over 1100 sites in Delaware County. - Lack of synthesis and research focus. - Adena/Hopewell Cultures – ‘Moundbuilders’ - Post-Contact - Oral traditions - Written records from settlers, missionaries, territorial government. - Very little archaeological record. Anderson Pow-Wow – Anderson, Indiana Woodward & McDonald (© 2001). http://goo.gl/TO0Ehi http://goo.gl/TO0Ehi http://goo.gl/qVIW7u http://goo.gl/WKHQ6u http://goo.gl/WGsnFY http://goo.gl/rS9Vk9 http://goo.gl/9NLqT2 WHY INACCURACIES? - 10 Indiana Core Standards for Grade 4 Social Studies - 1A Early Cultures - 1B Statehood - 1C Civil War and Post Civil War - 1D 20th Century to the Present - 1E Chronology, Analysis and Interpretation - 2 Foundations and Functions of Indiana Government - 3A Maps and Globes - 3B Human and Physical Systems - 4A Basic Principles of a Market Economy - 4B Indiana’s Economic History http://www.in.gov/edroundtable/files/SocStudies_FINAL3.pdf - Earliest known peoples in Indiana: circa 8000 BCE - Adena/Hopewell: circa 200 BCE – 500 CE - Mississipian: circa 1100 – 1450 CE - Delaware/Lenape: 1790s - 1821 Peter Pan. © 1953 Disney. Great Mound - Anderson Mound – New Castle MOUNDS in DELAWARE COUNTY - Archaeological record of ‘Adena’ and ‘Hopewell’ cultures in East Central Indiana date from 200 BCE. - Adena in Delaware, Madison, Henry, Randolph Counties roughly 160 BCE. - Hopewell in same areas: ~200 CE - Area sites: Great Mound in Anderson, Windsor Mound, Fudge Site, Chrysler Enclosure - Sites known to early pioneers in Delaware County: Liberty Township, Mt. Pleasant Township, Parkinson Mound, Perry Township, Salem Township - 12 Known sites in Delaware County - Current known sites: Yorktown Enclosure & Bell Creek http://goo.gl/7GCExF Retrieved from: http://cms.bsu.edu/-/media/WWW/DepartmentalContent/AAL/AALpdfs/ROI%2072%20public.pdf GIANTS? - No.
    [Show full text]
  • Smithsonian Affiliate Animal Encounters
    Smithsonian Affiliate Animal Encounters Create.Connect PRAIRIE LOOKOUT Nature Walk Quiet Spot PRAIRIETOWN PORTAL Download a PDF of the School Group Map for your visit. SCHOOL TOUR CHECK-IN GATE WELCOME CENTER WALKING DISTANCES Welcome Center to Lenape: .08 mi Lenape to William Conner House: .06 mi William Conner House to Prairietown Portal: .10 mi Prairietown Portal to Civil War Journey: .12 mi Prairietown Portal to Golden Eagle Inn: .08 mi Golden Eagle Inn to Welcome Center: .09 mi Welcome Center to Civil War Journey: .30 mi Welcome Center to Treetop Outpost: .30 mi EXPLORE ACRES OF FUN Let the adventure begin with a trip to Conner Prairie! Experience the Hoosier spirit and Indiana heritage with a visit to Conner Prairie. It’s the ideal place to immerse your students in the state’s history with hands-on activities and plenty of opportunities to interact with staff portraying characters from the past. Spend time outdoors, try hands-on STEM activities and get some exercise. Each visit covers academic standards in multiple subject areas including social studies, science and language arts. For an educational, authentic and entertaining look into the history that shapes us today, come to Conner Prairie! Click on an experience area below to learn more: william conner house 1836 Prairietown treetop outpost lenape indian camp makesmith workshop 1863 civil war journey create.connect 1859 balloon voyage animal encounters WILLIAM CONNER HOUSE This area is anchored by the William Conner House, built by William Conner in 1823 on this site and later preserved by Eli Lilly. Interactive exhibits in the house encourage exploration.
    [Show full text]