DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Nevada, Reno If the Desert Blooms: a Technological

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

University of Nevada, Reno If the Desert Blooms: A Technological Perspective on Paleoindian Ecology in the Great Basin from the Old River Bed, Utah A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology by Daron Duke Dr. Gary Haynes/Dissertation Advisor August 2011 © by Daron Duke 2011 All Rights Reserved THE GRADUATE SCHOOL We recommend that the dissertation prepared under our supervision by DARON DUKE entitled If The Desert Blooms: A Technological Perspective On Paleoindian Ecology In The Great Basin From The Old River Bed, Utah be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Gary Haynes, Ph.D., Advisor Robert G. Elston, Ph.D., Committee Member David Rhode, Ph.D., Committee Member Ted Goebel, Ph.D., Committee Member Anna K. Panorska, Ph.D., Graduate School Representative Marsha H. Read, Ph. D., Dean, Graduate School August, 2011 i ABSTRACT The earliest inhabitants of the Great Basin adapted to a well‐watered environment that was already set to disappear. This much seems clear from paleoenvironmental data, but a good understanding of how the declining ecosystem affected Paleoindian peoples still eludes us. In the now‐barren expanse of the Great Salt Lake Desert, the Old River Bed (ORB) delta existed as a sprawling distributary wetland at the Pleistocene‐Holocene transition. At its peak, the system would have been one of the largest marshlands in the Great Basin. Paleoindians visited the distal reaches of the wetlands between about 12,100 and 9900 cal BP, when it finally dried up. My study tracks spatial and temporal variability in lithic technology across the distal ORB to address issues of how people coped with the regionally deteriorating environment. Patterns are compared between the west and east sides of the study area, which roughly date to sequential time frames of 12,100‐11,200 cal BP and 11,300‐ 9900 cal BP, respectively, based on dating of buried wetland organics. These subareas correspond with spatially distinct groups of distributary paleochannels. Using a formal technological model, lithic data are examined in terms of reduction strategies, toolstone selection, and morphology as they relate to emphasis on transport efficiency. The results of the analysis show that people were more transport‐efficiency conscious earlier in time than they were later. According to the model, this directly relates to occupation length—viewed here as time spent in the basin, not necessarily at a single site— whereby increasing mobility necessitates the need for transport efficiency in order to reduce the risks of not having enough stone on‐hand and the costs of having to procure more. When the study subareas are compared, west‐subarea assemblages indicate greater ii emphasis on transport efficiency with streamlined toolkits made more often from obsidian than seen in the east subarea, where fine‐grained volcanic (FGV) stone is more common. This strategy placed a buffer of toolstone into relatively large tools that were reduced bifacially through an extended sequence. Parman, Lake Mojave, and Cougar Mountain projectile points tend to be associated with the west subarea and this technological pattern. The technology of the east subarea is “flakier,” with smaller tools being made from transported flake blanks following a more local toolstone profile. This strategy shifts costs from the production and maintenance investments of transport efficiency to the transport of stone directly to its location of use. Bonneville and Pinto projectile points tend to be associated with the east subarea and this technological pattern. A second pattern found predominately in east‐subarea sites is the extreme economization of obsidian. Various small biface fragments and irregular tools are seen, and the extensively reworked Stubby stemmed type is also more common in this subarea. This reduction pattern signals higher predictability in tool‐use requirements and raw material acquisition. These data are interpreted to represent shorter basin occupations earlier and longer basin occupations later in time. Assuming the total ORBa delt was more or less always capable of sustaining people for long periods of time while it existed, any shift in settlement mobility should be driven by conditions in the other regional wetlands they visited. Being in such a large drainage basin, the ORB likely persisted while smaller basin wetlands succumbed to Early Holocene drying more rapidly. Thus, I argue that the shift in lithic technology seen on the distal ORB provides a dynamic model for how people responded to regional environmental decline that is currently missing from Paleoindian studies. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I have many people to thank for pushing me toward getting this dissertation finished. My graduate committee was influential in keeping my mind centered on the issues, both directly through their assistance and indirectly by conducting their own brands of research. Drs. Gary Haynes, Bob Elston, Dave Rhode, Ted Goebel, and Anna Panorska all contributed invaluably to my learning, beyond what is reflected in this study. I regard each of them as true scholars who I will continue to look to in the future. This research definitely could not have been completed without the full support of Jaynie Hirschi, Archaeologist at Hill Air Force Base, Utah. Through a litany of cultural resource management projects, she has facilitated just about every sideways research idea I wanted to put to the test. She is a good friend to me and to archaeology. I would also like to thank those working on the Army side of the Old River Bed. Rachel Quist, Archaeologist at Dugway Proving Ground, and the Desert Research Institute team—Dr. David Madsen, David Page, David Schmitt, and Dr. Jack Oviatt—who have all been collegial and gracious in sharing site visits, information, insights, and fun. The folks at Far Western deserve special thanks for waiting this process out and providing some time and resources to help me get done. Dr. D. Craig Young is in this with me to some extent as we have together developed the research program for the Air Force. His geoarchaeological expertise is an important contribution, and I cannot overlook his covering for me when I came back to school. All the smart people at Far Western continue to inspire me as great examples of contract archaeology at its best. Sharlyn Anderson, Mike Lenzi, and Kasey O’Horo all helped with various data‐collating and paper‐chasing jobs as I iv closed in on finishing. I am also grateful to Heather Baron, Nicole Birney, and Wendy Masarweh for helping with the artifact figures and stitching this document together. Finally, I would like to acknowledge my friends and family for their encouragement and support. Several had direct contributions. Jim Carter wove me into his ongoing work for the Air Force at the beginning. Tony Taylor and Sam Coffman were undergraduate lab rats who are rapidly catching up with me, but for at least some brief period at UNR I was able to make them do many of my least favorite data tasks. Mike Lenzi found himself in the same unfortunate position at Far Western. I hope each took something good from it, and I look forward to knowing them for years to come. Verla Jackson’s help on the administrative end at UNR was crucial. Leticia Neal has listened to more conversations about obsidian hydration dating than anyone should be allowed to endure. For the many others who are not mentioned but shared this experience with me, know that you are all remembered fondly. My parents have always supported my career in archaeology, and my final thanks goes to them. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract .................................................................................................................................................. i Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................ iii Chapter 1: Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Research Pertinence of the Distal Old River Bed and Approach to this Study ....................... 3 Research Approach and Theoretical Orientation .................................................................... 6 Recent Perspectives on Old Objectives in Great Basin Paleoindian Research ......................... 8 The Interpretive Context of Paleoindian Studies: Data versus Theory ................................ 9 Recent Research .......................................................................................................................... 13 The Role of Lithic Studies ............................................................................................................. 17 Formal Modeling of Lithic Reduction and Analytical Approach ....................................... 18 Terminology and Study Organization ........................................................................................ 20 Use of the Term “Paleoindian” ................................................................................................ 20 Chapter Organization ................................................................................................................ 22 Chapter 2: Chronology and Context of the Distal Old River Bed ........................................... 23 Chronology of the Old River Bed and its Delta ........................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Bibliography

    Bibliography

    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Correlating Biological

    UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Correlating Biological

    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Correlating Biological Relationships, Social Inequality, and Population Movement among Prehistoric California Foragers: Ancient Human DNA Analysis from CA-SCL-38 (Yukisma Site). A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology by Cara Rachelle Monroe Committee in charge: Professor Michael A. Jochim, Chair Professor Lynn Gamble Professor Michael Glassow Adjunct Professor John R. Johnson September 2014 The dissertation of Cara Rachelle Monroe is approved. ____________________________________________ Lynn H. Gamble ____________________________________________ Michael A. Glassow ____________________________________________ John R. Johnson ____________________________________________ Michael A. Jochim, Committee Chair September 2014 Correlating Biological Relationships, Social Inequality, and Population Movement among Prehistoric California Foragers: Ancient Human DNA Analysis from CA-SCL-38 (Yukisma Site). Copyright © 2014 by Cara Rahelle Monroe iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Completing this dissertation has been an intellectual journey filled with difficulties, but ultimately rewarding in unexpected ways. I am leaving graduate school, albeit later than expected, as a more dedicated and experienced scientist who has adopted a four field anthropological research approach. This was not only the result of the mentorships and the education I received from the University of California-Santa Barbara’s Anthropology department, but also from friends
  • Archaeological Variability and Interpretation in Global Perspective

    Archaeological Variability and Interpretation in Global Perspective

    ARCHAEOLOGICAL VARIABILITY AND INTERPRETATION IN GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE ARCHAEOLOGICAL VARIABILITY AND INTERPRETATION IN GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE EDITED BY Alan P. Sullivan III AND Deborah I. Olszewski UNIVERSITY PRESS OF COLORADO Boulder © 2016 by University Press of Colorado Published by University Press of Colorado 5589 Arapahoe Avenue, Suite 206C Boulder, Colorado 80303 All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America The University Press of Colorado is a proud member of Association of American University Presses. The University Press of Colorado is a cooperative publishing enterprise supported, in part, by Adams State University, Colorado State University, Fort Lewis College, Metropolitan State University of Denver, Regis University, University of Colorado, University of Northern Colorado, Utah State University, and Western State Colorado University. ∞ This paper meets the requirements of the ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper). ISBN: 978-1-60732-493-5 (cloth) ISBN: 978-1-60732-494-2 (ebook) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Sullivan, Alan P., editor. | Olszewski, Deborah, editor. Title: Archaeological variability and interpretation in global perspective / edited by Alan P. Sullivan III and Deborah I. Olszewski. Description: Boulder : University Press of Colorado, [2016] | Includes bibliographical references. Identifiers: LCCN 2016000562| ISBN 9781607324935 (cloth) | ISBN 9781607324942 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Archaeology—Methodology. Classification: LCC CC75 .A6545 2016 | DDC 930.1—dc23 LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2016000562 Front cover design by Irfan Ibrahim Contents Acknowledgments ix ChaptER ONE Working with Archaeological Variability in the Twenty-First Century—Thinking about Materiality, Epistemology, and Ontology Alan P. Sullivan III and Deborah I. Olszewski 3 SECTION I. Advances in Interpreting Regional Archaeological Records ChaptER two A Lithic Perspective on Ecological Dynamics in the Upper Pleistocene of Western Eurasia C.
  • Annotated Atlatl Bibliography John Whittaker Grinnell College Version June 20, 2012

    Annotated Atlatl Bibliography John Whittaker Grinnell College Version June 20, 2012

    1 Annotated Atlatl Bibliography John Whittaker Grinnell College version June 20, 2012 Introduction I began accumulating this bibliography around 1996, making notes for my own uses. Since I have access to some obscure articles, I thought it might be useful to put this information where others can get at it. Comments in brackets [ ] are my own comments, opinions, and critiques, and not everyone will agree with them. The thoroughness of the annotation varies depending on when I read the piece and what my interests were at the time. The many articles from atlatl newsletters describing contests and scores are not included. I try to find news media mentions of atlatls, but many have little useful info. There are a few peripheral items, relating to topics like the dating of the introduction of the bow, archery, primitive hunting, projectile points, and skeletal anatomy. Through the kindness of Lorenz Bruchert and Bill Tate, in 2008 I inherited the articles accumulated for Bruchert’s extensive atlatl bibliography (Bruchert 2000), and have been incorporating those I did not have in mine. Many previously hard to get articles are now available on the web - see for instance postings on the Atlatl Forum at the Paleoplanet webpage http://paleoplanet69529.yuku.com/forums/26/t/WAA-Links-References.html and on the World Atlatl Association pages at http://www.worldatlatl.org/ If I know about it, I will sometimes indicate such an electronic source as well as the original citation. The articles use a variety of measurements. Some useful conversions: 1”=2.54
  • A Quantitative Analysis of Promontory Cave 1: an Archaeological Study on Population Size, Occupation Span, Artifact Use-Life, and Accumulation

    A Quantitative Analysis of Promontory Cave 1: an Archaeological Study on Population Size, Occupation Span, Artifact Use-Life, and Accumulation

    A Quantitative Analysis of Promontory Cave 1: An Archaeological Study on Population Size, Occupation Span, Artifact Use-life, and Accumulation by Jennifer Hallson A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Anthropology University of Alberta © Jennifer Hallson, 2017 Abstract Promontory Cave 1 on Great Salt Lake, Utah exhibits an incredible level of preservation rarely seen at archaeological sites. The high proportion of perishable materials provides a unique opportunity to study cultural remains that are usually lost to taphonomic processes. Extensive radiocarbon dating has defined a narrow occupation period of ca. 1250-1290 CE (Ives et al. 2014) and the bounded space of the cave allows for confident estimations of the total number of artifacts present. I have completed quantitative analyses that use several methods to study Cave 1 and its inhabitants, including: artifact density, three-dimensional modeling, proportional calculations, accumulation equations, and statistical equations. Archaeologists know surprisingly little about the rates at which artifacts enter the archaeological record and my analyses examine this factor along with related variables such as use-life and accumulation with the above methods. The above methods also allow for inferences to be made on population size, population composition, and occupation span and frequency. Quantitative analyses of the Promontory Cave 1 assemblage can be linked directly to the exploration of Dene migration southward from Canada, as artifacts found in the cave point towards an identity of Apachean ancestors during their migration south. This research also has the potential for much broader application in archaeological investigations by increasing our awareness of what is usually missing; organic artifacts by far dominated past life but are often forgotten during site analysis.
  • Man Before History

    Man Before History

    CHAPTER 2 MAN BEFORE HISTORY H uman beings have walked the mountains and deserts, the shores and fens of earth for thousands if not millions of years. We have no exact figures concerning the length of human habitation in what is Box Elder County, but we have evidence of human occupa­ tion going back several thousand years. Men, women, and children of whom we have scant record lived and died in the mountains, valleys, caves, and on the riverbanks of the area for generations. Our ignorance of the prehistoric inhabitants of Box Elder, except for the detritus they left, along with their mortal remains and vestiges of their habitations, is almost all-encompassing. We know nothing of their thought, religion, hopes and dreams, and plans. We can under­ stand these cultures, totally removed from our own in time, space, and cosmos, only on their own terms. We can only describe the bits and pieces we find left behind. Archaeologist David Madsen explains that prehistoric societies are usually seen "... in terms of extremes; either as ignorant savages blundering their way through life or as primitive spiritualists living in harmony with nature and the world around them. But the[y] . MAN BEFORE HISTORY 29 were just like every human group; some were cruel and some were benevolent; some were smart and some were a little slow; some worked hard and some were lazy. They were human beings, simply that, trying to raise children in a variable and sometimes harsh land­ scape."1 Part of the gap which separates us from these ancient peoples is their intimate connection with the land, and the variation and diver­ sity of land forms, climate, elevation, vegetation, and all the environ­ mental variables encountered in the cyclical yearly migrations of the ancients.
  • Paleo-Indians

    Paleo-Indians

    Paleo-Indians “Prehistory of the Americas” redirects here. For other 15 000 4500 aspects of the prehistory of the Americas, see History of 25 000 40 000 the Americas § Pre-colonization. 12 000 100 000 70 000 Paleo-Indians (Paleoindians) or Paleoamericans is a 200 000 30 000 1500 classification term given to the first peoples who entered, 50 000 Homo sapiens 1500 and subsequently inhabited, the American continents dur- Homo neanderthalensis Homo erectus ing the final glacial episodes of the late Pleistocene pe- riod. The prefix “paleo-" comes from the Greek ad- jective palaios (παλαιός), meaning “old”. The term Map of early human migrations based on the Out of Africa the- [7] “Paleo-Indians” applies specifically to the lithic period ory. in the Western Hemisphere and is distinct from the term "Paleolithic".[1] routes traveled, are subject to ongoing research and [8] Evidence suggests big-animal hunters crossed the Bering discussion. The traditional theory has been that these Strait from Eurasia into North America over a land early migrants moved into the Beringia land bridge be- and ice bridge (Beringia), that existed between 45,000- tween eastern Siberia and present-day Alaska around [9][10] 12,000 BCE (47,000-14,000 BP).[2] Small isolated 40,000 – 17,000 years ago, when sea levels were [11] groups of hunter-gatherers migrated alongside herds of significantly lowered due to the Quaternary glaciation. large herbivores far into Alaska. From 16,500-13,500 These people are believed to have followed herds of now- BCE (18,500-15,500 BP), ice-free corridors developed extinct pleistocene megafauna along ice-free corridors along the Pacific coast and valleys of North America.[3] that stretched between the Laurentide and Cordilleran ice [12] This allowed animals, followed by humans, to migrate sheets.
  • Whittaker-Annotated Atlbib July 31 2014

    Whittaker-Annotated Atlbib July 31 2014

    1 Annotated Atlatl Bibliography John Whittaker Grinnell College version of August 2, 2014 Introduction I began accumulating this bibliography around 1996, making notes for my own uses. Since I have access to some obscure articles, I thought it might be useful to put this information where others can get at it. Comments in brackets [ ] are my own comments, opinions, and critiques, and not everyone will agree with them. I try in particular to note problems in some of the studies that are often cited by others with less atlatl knowledge, and correct some of the misinformation. The thoroughness of the annotation varies depending on when I read the piece and what my interests were at the time. The many articles from atlatl newsletters describing contests and scores are not included. I try to find news media mentions of atlatls, but many have little useful info. There are a few peripheral items, relating to topics like the dating of the introduction of the bow, archery, primitive hunting, projectile points, and skeletal anatomy. Through the kindness of Lorenz Bruchert and Bill Tate, in 2008 I inherited the articles accumulated for Bruchert’s extensive atlatl bibliography (Bruchert 2000), and have been incorporating those I did not have in mine. Many previously hard to get articles are now available on the web - see for instance postings on the Atlatl Forum at the Paleoplanet webpage http://paleoplanet69529.yuku.com/forums/26/t/WAA-Links-References.html and on the World Atlatl Association pages at http://www.worldatlatl.org/ If I know about it, I will sometimes indicate such an electronic source as well as the original citation, but at heart I am an old-fashioned paper-lover.
  • The Terminal Pleistocene/Early Holocene Record in the Northwestern Great Basin: What We Know, What We Don't Know, and How We M

    The Terminal Pleistocene/Early Holocene Record in the Northwestern Great Basin: What We Know, What We Don't Know, and How We M

    PALEOAMERICA, 2017 Center for the Study of the First Americans http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2016.1272395 Texas A&M University REVIEW ARTICLE The Terminal Pleistocene/Early Holocene Record in the Northwestern Great Basin: What We Know, What We Don’t Know, and How We May Be Wrong Geoffrey M. Smitha and Pat Barkerb aGreat Basin Paleoindian Research Unit, Department of Anthropology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA; bNevada State Museum, Carson City, NV, USA ABSTRACT KEYWORDS The Great Basin has traditionally not featured prominently in discussions of how and when the New Great Basin; Paleoindian World was colonized; however, in recent years work at Oregon’s Paisley Five Mile Point Caves and archaeology; peopling of the other sites has highlighted the region’s importance to ongoing debates about the peopling of the Americas Americas. In this paper, we outline our current understanding of Paleoindian lifeways in the northwestern Great Basin, focusing primarily on developments in the past 20 years. We highlight several potential biases that have shaped traditional interpretations of Paleoindian lifeways and suggest that the foundations of ethnographically-documented behavior were present in the earliest period of human history in the region. 1. Introduction comprehensive review of Paleoindian archaeology was published two decades ago. We also highlight several The Great Basin has traditionally not been a focus of biases that have shaped traditional interpretations of Paleoindian research due to its paucity of stratified and early lifeways in the region. well-dated open-air sites, proboscidean kill sites, and demonstrable Clovis-aged occupations. Until recently, the region’s terminal Pleistocene/early Holocene (TP/ 2.
  • 2017 Conference Program Issue Volume 43, Number 2 Welcome to Redmond! 44Th Annual ARARA Conference, 2017 Nother Outstanding Annual Conference Begins! As Usual, a A

    2017 Conference Program Issue Volume 43, Number 2 Welcome to Redmond! 44Th Annual ARARA Conference, 2017 Nother Outstanding Annual Conference Begins! As Usual, a A

    2017 Conference Program Issue Volume 43, Number 2 Welcome to Redmond! 44th Annual ARARA Conference, 2017 nother outstanding annual conference begins! As usual, a a. Standing Committees A multitude of volunteers helped plan the conference. Led by i. Nominating Committee—Co-Chair Chris Gralapp Monica Wadsworth-Seibel, 2017 Conference Coordinator, Jim Election of Directors—Results Keyser, Local Chair, Lou Hillman, Program Chair, and remark- b. Ad Hoc Committees able volunteers such as Valarie Anderson and Don Hann from IV. Annual Conference Report—Conference Coordinator the Archaeological Society of Central Oregon, the conference is Donna Gillette & 2017 Conference Coordinator Monica bound to be a success. ASCO President Phillip Ruder has been Wadsworth-Seibel very supportive of ARARA. Once again, ARARA is lucky to V. New Business have people with such energy and dedication working for us. a. Nominating Committee Board activities regarding a possible ARARA grants program ACTION NEEDED: Elect 3 ARARA members to are summarized elsewhere in this issue. Other major agenda items serve on the 2017-18 Nominating Committee this past year included an in-depth review of the Bylaws before VI. Adjourn the Bylaws Committee began its work,recently requesting the *Additional committee reports may be added by the Board prior to the Business Meeting. Board’s comments on a draft of proposed revisions. The Board continues to foster ARARA’s relationship with ASU where our 2017 ARARA Acknowledgments Archives and Library are housed. Archives Committee Chair nce again ARARA members have volunteered to bring Scott Seibel’s article in this issue has more information about Oyour annual conference to you! On behalf of the mem- activities related to ARARA’s collections.
  • CONFLICT and AGRICULTURE DURING the LATE PREHISTORIC PERIOD in the UPPER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY by Danielle Marie Krebsbach Submitte

    CONFLICT and AGRICULTURE DURING the LATE PREHISTORIC PERIOD in the UPPER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY by Danielle Marie Krebsbach Submitte

    CONFLICT AND AGRICULTURE DURING THE LATE PREHISTORIC PERIOD IN THE UPPER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY By Danielle Marie Krebsbach Submitted to the Faculty of The Archaeological Studies Program Department of Sociology and Archaeology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science University of Wisconsin-La Crosse 2013 Copyright © 2013 by Danielle Krebsbach All rights reserved ii CONFLICT AND AGRICULTURE DURING THE LATE PREHISTORIC PERIOD IN THE UPPER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY Danielle Krebsbach, B.S. University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, 2013 The end of the prehistoric period is a time of drastic change in the lives of humans who inhabited the Upper Mississippi Valley. Approximately AD 1000 people began to practice corn agriculture rather than simple cultivation in order to compensate for a shortage of food resulting from population increase. During the same time period there is an escalation in conflict in the Upper Mississippi Valley. The purpose of this study is to observe the tends in both agriculture and conflict from AD 500- European contact and determine whether the early sites that adopted agriculture also experienced more conflict than sites with minimum corn consumption. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENT I would first like to thank Dr. Joseph A. Tiffany, Dr. David Anderson, and Dr. Connie Arzigian for all of their help and guidance in the writing and research process, and for keeping me on track throughout the semester. I wound also like to thank the people in my writing group Robert Reis, Sarah Sonderman, and Seth Taft for their helpful feedback and humor which helped a lot through the semester. I want to thank the University of Wisconsin Archaeological Studies Program for five years of wonderful archaeological training and for giving students like me to the chance to utilize what we have learned in a way that will prepare me for my career after graduation.
  • Prehistoric Humans and Elk (Cervus Canadensis) in the Western Great Lakes: a Zooarchaeological Perspective

    Prehistoric Humans and Elk (Cervus Canadensis) in the Western Great Lakes: a Zooarchaeological Perspective

    University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations May 2020 Prehistoric Humans and Elk (cervus Canadensis) in the Western Great Lakes: A Zooarchaeological Perspective Rebekah Ann Ernat University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Ernat, Rebekah Ann, "Prehistoric Humans and Elk (cervus Canadensis) in the Western Great Lakes: A Zooarchaeological Perspective" (2020). Theses and Dissertations. 2372. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/2372 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PREHISTORIC HUMANS AND ELK (CERVUS CANADENSIS) IN THE WESTERN GREAT LAKES: A ZOOARCHAEOLGOCIAL PERSPECTIVE by Rebekah Ann Ernat A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Anthropology at The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee May 2020 ABSTRACT PREHISTORIC HUMANS AND ELK (CERVUS CANADENSIS) IN THE WESTERN GREAT LAKES: A ZOOARCHAEOLGOCIAL PERSPECTIVE by Rebekah Ann Ernat The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2020 Under the Supervision of Professor Jean Hudson This thesis examines the relationship between humans and elk (Cervus canadensis) in the western Great Lakes region from prehistoric through early historic times, with a focus on Wisconsin archaeological sites. It takes a social zooarchaeological perspective, drawing from archaeological, ecological, biological, historical, and ethnographic sources. I also use optimal foraging theory to examine subsistence-related decisions.