DOCSLIB.ORG

Report of the Three-Month Wild Polio Virus Outbreak Response

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report of the Three-Month Wild Polio Virus Outbreak Response 1 Report of the Three-Month Wild Polio Virus Outbreak Response Assessment Kenya 18 to 26 August 2013 9 September 2013 2 Introduction On 9 May 2013, the Somalia Ministry of Health reported the first confirmed case of type 1 wild poliovirus (WPV1) in a 32-month old girl from Mogadishu with onset of acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) on 18 April 2013. A week later, on 16 May 2013, Kenya confirmed a case of WPV1 in a 4- month old girl from the Dadaab refugee camp in North Eastern Province of Kenya with date of onset 30 April 2013. Three months following the detection of the outbreak in Somalia, on 14 August 2013 the Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) issued an advanced notification of a case of WPV1 from a child living in Ethiopia with date of onset 10 July 2013. As of 30 August 2013, Kenya has confirmed 13 cases of WPV-1 whereas Somalia has confirmed 152 cases of WPV1 cases in 33 districts. The latest date of onset for Kenya’s polio outbreak is 14 July 2013. The 13 confirmed cases in Kenya are from the Garissa County in North Eastern Region and all Kenya’s cases are concentrated within the axis of the Dadaab refugee camp with proximity to the border with Somalia. Of the 13 WPV1 cases, 7 (54%) cases are from the refugee camps whereas 6 (46%) are from the host community. In the refugee camp, 4 (57%) are from Hagadera, 2 (29%) from IFO1 and 1 (14%) from Kambios camps. Among those from the host community, 3 (23%) are from Damanjale, 1 (8%) each from Mathegesi and Hamay, and Hulugho areas. Regarding the age distribution, 10 (77%) out of the 13 cases are <5 years (range of 4-60 months), while 3 (23%) are adults, two aged 19 and one aged 23 years. Nine (69%) of the 13 cases are female. Only 4 (31%) out of the 13 cases had received at least 4-doses of OPV, 2 (16%) had received 1-dose of OPV each and 7 (54%) had never received oral polio vaccine (OPV) before. Six (46%) of the cases occurred during the month of May (1-18 th ), 2 (15%) in the month of June (3 rd & 14 th ) and 5 (39%) in July (2 nd -14 th ), 2013. Although 7 (54%) of the cases had no travel history, 6 (46%) were from nomadic families and only one case had a travel history to Somalia. Two cases were related and had family contact before the onset of paralysis. The population dynamics in this area are complex. Many are nomadic pastoralists who are always on the move between Kenya and Somalia for trade, grazing and meeting relatives. There are strong links to clans or tribes rather than nationality. The host communities and the refugee camps interact with each other freely, creating a favorable environment for disease transmission. Even though the Kenya- Somalia border is officially closed, there are multiple informal border crossing points. Since January 2013, Kenya has detected 373 AFP cases, giving an annualized national non-polio (NP- AFP) detection rate of 2.64/100,000 children aged <15 years. Of the 373 AFP cases, 66 (18%) 3 cases are from North Eastern Province. Twenty percent (13) of the AFP cases in North Eastern were detected during the polio SIAs. This report summarizes the findings from a 3-month outbreak assessment conducted by an inter-agency team of experts (see annex 1) between 18 and 26 August 2013 Objectives The objectives of the 3-month assessment were to: 1. Assess the quality and adequacy of polio outbreak response activities to evaluate if the response is on track to interrupt polio transmission within six months of detection of the first case, as per WHA-established standards 2. To provide additional technical recommendations to assist the country meet this goal Methods The draft guidelines developed for the 3-month assessment of the polio outbreak response were followed. The assessment was comprised the following activities: 1. Field visits to the areas at risk or affected by the outbreak including evaluating the planning process and implementation of an SIA and/or assessing response activities. 2. A desk review and field assessments of the quality of AFP surveillance and routine immunization activities 3. Interviews with national and sub-national officials, NGOs and other partner organizations involved in polio eradication activities in Kenya. 4. Provision of feedback to the government authorities and national partner teams assisting the government with the response. Assessment Teams and areas visited Four teams were constituted covering the following areas: 1. Nairobi (central level assessment and field assessment of high risk districts in Nairobi) 2. Rift Valley Province (Turkana Central, Turkana West, Loima sub-counties and Kakuma refugee camp) 4 3. North Eastern Province (Garissa County, Dadaab District and Dadaab refugee camps) 4. Coast Province (Mombasa County) Assessments The assessments focussed on: 1. Speed and appropriateness of immediate outbreak response activities in line with WHA Resolution, 2006 (WHA59.1) 2. Effectiveness of government leadership and partner coordination during outbreak response 3. Quality of SIAs – planning, delivery, monitoring and communications 4. AFP surveillance quality 5. Routine immunization performance 6. Adequacy of human resources to carry out effective response activities Summary of findings Central level The central level assessment focussed on adherence to the recommended guidelines regarding the speed and quality of response, and partner coordination and collaboration. Meetings were held with representatives of Ministry of Health (MOH), Nairobi County Health Office, Kenya Red Cross, UNHCR/Kenya, UNICEF/Kenya, WHO/Kenya, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), and Polio Plus, Rotary International. The following were the key findings: A. Speed and appropriateness of immediate outbreak response The country met the requirements of speed and appropriateness. MOH conducted four large- scale, house-to-house vaccination rounds using bOPV and tOPV, with the first round within four weeks of confirmation of the index case, and an interval of approximately four weeks between subsequent rounds. The outbreak response comprised the following supplementary immunization activities: Round 1: 27-31 May 2013 . Targeted a population of 512,610 <5 year 5 old children in all districts in Garissa County, except refugee camps and 3 host districts where children <15 years of age were vaccinated. bOPV was used in Dadaab refugee camp and 3 host districts; tOPV was used in the rest of Garissa. Independent monitoring of <5 year old children verified by finger-marking showed vaccination coverage was 86%. Round 2: 17-21 June 2013 . Targeted 1.35 million individuals, including: the entire population in Dadaab all refugee camps, <15 year olds in 3 host districts, and <5 year olds in 22 other districts in North Eastern Province, neighboring districts in Coast Province, and selected districts in Nairobi. Independent monitoring coverage of finger-marked <5 year old children was 91%. Round 3: 1-10 July 2013. Implemented in phases targeting 4,661,881 persons, including: Dadaab refugee camp (July 1-6) covering <15 year olds, four districts (Dadaab, Fafi, Lagdera, Wajir South) bordering Dadaab Camp (3-7 July) covering <5 year old children, all other districts including those on Coast, Turkana, and Nairobi. Independent monitoring coverage of finger-marked <5 year old children was 93%. Round 4: 17- 21 August 2013 : The round targeted 4.9 million individuals in 127 districts. This round was observed by the assessment teams in their areas of deployment and formed part of the field component of this outbreak response assessment. B. Effectiveness of government leadership and partner coordination during outbreak response The following were key findings: 1. Regular calls between the global partners took place to coordinate the outbreak response. 2. Joint visits were undertaken to North Eastern Province (Garissa and Dadaab) by high level representatives of MOPH, UNICEF, and WHO for advocacy, assessment of preparedness, and monitoring of the SIA rounds. 3. In the initial phase of the outbreak, there were reports of lack of coordination between WHO/AFRO and WHO/EMRO and little/no sharing of lessons learned from SIA implementation. Coordination improved in subsequent campaigns. 4. There was excellent collaboration and support between the laboratory (KEMRI) with WHO/AFRO, WHO/EMRO, WHO/IST, and the Centers for Disease Control Prevention (CDC). However, it was reported that human resources and laboratory equipment were initially inadequate to cope with the increased number of stool specimens. 6 5. Kenya Red Cross volunteers supported rounds 1 and 2 of SIAs. Funding was inadequate to support all the volunteers needed for round 3 and 4 of the SIAS. 6. Community health workers cover only 30% of Kenya, and they tend to be working in Nairobi and other places where they are not critically needed. Funding is not available to support a community health worker network covering all priority areas (52% of Kenya), including high risk pastoralist communities. C. Recommendations for the central level assessment 1. Increase partner involvement: a. Ensure that robust advocacy and resource mobilization plans are developed and implemented and that all partners have a stake and a voice in decision-making. b. Strengthen partnership with Kenya Red Cross; explore ways their volunteers can support immunization at informal and formal Somalia border crossings, and in high risk, hard to reach communities. c. Strengthen focus on cross-border activities, including increasing the frequency of cross-border meetings and monitoring the completion of recommendations/action points from the meetings. Hold partners accountable for progress. d. Assess the feasibility of fixed immunization posts at border crossings and at priority transit sites within the country. Develop a staffing and resource plan to ensure continuity of care. e. When possible, synchronize campaigns with neighbors.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In Kenya —Background Paper
    A Collaborative Research Project Funded by: Implemented by: An Overview of the Poultry Sector and Status of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) in Kenya —Background Paper John M. Omiti Sam O. Okuthe Africa/Indonesia Region Report No. 4 Pro‐Poor HPAI Risk Reduction Table of Contents Page PREFACE ........................................................................................................................................ VI ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................... VIII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... X 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Motivation ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Significance and scope ............................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Summary of key findings ......................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Road map ................................................................................................................................ 2 2. VITAL COUNTRY STATISTICS .................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Size and location
    [Show full text]
  • County Urban Governance Tools
    County Urban Governance Tools This map shows various governance and management approaches counties are using in urban areas Mandera P Turkana Marsabit P West Pokot Wajir ish Elgeyo Samburu Marakwet Busia Trans Nzoia P P Isiolo P tax Bungoma LUFs P Busia Kakamega Baringo Kakamega Uasin P Gishu LUFs Nandi Laikipia Siaya tax P P P Vihiga Meru P Kisumu ga P Nakuru P LUFs LUFs Nyandarua Tharaka Garissa Kericho LUFs Nithi LUFs Nyeri Kirinyaga LUFs Homa Bay Nyamira P Kisii P Muranga Bomet Embu Migori LUFs P Kiambu Nairobi P Narok LUFs P LUFs Kitui Machakos Kisii Tana River Nyamira Makueni Lamu Nairobi P LUFs tax P Kajiado KEY County Budget and Economic Forums (CBEFs) They are meant to serve as the primary institution for ensuring public participation in public finances in order to im- Mom- prove accountability and public participation at the county level. basa Baringo County, Bomet County, Bungoma County, Busia County,Embu County, Elgeyo/ Marakwet County, Homabay County, Kajiado County, Kakamega County, Kericho Count, Kiambu County, Kilifi County, Kirin- yaga County, Kisii County, Kisumu County, Kitui County, Kwale County, Laikipia County, Machakos Coun- LUFs ty, Makueni County, Meru County, Mombasa County, Murang’a County, Nairobi County, Nakuru County, Kilifi Nandi County, Nyandarua County, Nyeri County, Samburu County, Siaya County, TaitaTaveta County, Taita Taveta TharakaNithi County, Trans Nzoia County, Uasin Gishu County Youth Empowerment Programs in urban areas In collaboration with the national government, county governments unveiled
    [Show full text]
  • Second Health Strategic and Investment Plan (Chsip Ii)
    MOMBASA COUNTY of HealthDepartment Services SECOND HEALTH STRATEGIC AND INVESTMENT PLAN (CHSIP II) 2018 – 2022 A Healthy and Productive Community Abridged Version August 2018 CONTENTS CONTENTS ii ABBREVIATIONS iii LIST OF FIGURES v LIST OF TABLES 6 Foreword 7 Acknowledgment 8 Executive Summary 9 1 COUNTY INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW 1 1.1 About Mombasa County ........................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Population Demographics...................................................................................................... 3 1.3 County Health Sector............................................................................................................. 3 1.4 Purpose of the Second County Health Sector Strategic and Investment Plan (CHSIP II) 2018-2022 .............................................................................................................................. 4 1.5 County Performance Management Framework ..................................................................... 5 1.6 The Planning Process............................................................................................................. 6 1.7 Mission, Vision and Values ................................................................................................... 7 2 SITUATION ANALYSIS 8 2.1 Summary of County Health Sector Performance 2013/14 – 2017/18 ................................... 8 2.2 Situation Analysis .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens' Perception of Leadership During COVID-19 Times in Mombasa, Kenya
    Citizens’ Perception of Leadership during COVID-19 Times in Mombasa, Kenya Fathima Azmiya Badurdeen To cite this version: Fathima Azmiya Badurdeen. Citizens’ Perception of Leadership during COVID-19 Times in Mombasa, Kenya. 2020, https://mambo.hypotheses.org/2853. halshs-03078567 HAL Id: halshs-03078567 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03078567 Submitted on 16 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Institut français de recherche en Afrique French Institute for Research in Africa MAMBO! XVII (4), 2020 COVID-19 Special Papers Citizens’ Perception of Leadership during COVID-19 Times in Mombasa, Kenya Fathima AZMIYA BADURDEEN Cite: AZMIYA BADURDEEN, Fathima. 2020. Citizens’ Perception of Leadership during COVID-19 Times in Mombasa, Kenya. Mambo! vol. XVII, no. 4. URL: https://mambo.hypotheses.org/2853 The author: Dr. Fathima Azmiya Badurdeen is a lecturer in Development Studies at the Department of Social Sciences, Technical University of Mombasa, working on issues related to youth, gender and violent extremism. The article is an outcome of the research funded by the French Institute for Research in Africa (IFRA) from April to September 2020. Email: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • CONFLICT SNAPSHOT Kenya December 2020 Introduction
    Funded by the European Union CONFLICT SNAPSHOT Kenya December 2020 Introduction Kenya is a large culturally and ethnic diverse country, with over 40 different ethnic groups and numerous superimposed conflicts. Ethnic tensions and clashes coupled with political instability that manifests during the election period have been on the rise in the recent past. Recurrent drought that pushes herders into farmlands in search of pasture has led to violent clashes between herders and farmers in Garissa and Tana River counties. Ethnic group affiliation and highly centralised ethnopolitics are the primary identity of many Kenyans, especially during periods of turmoil. According to the Conflict Analysis of Kenya report, Kenyan Muslims have been marginalised within the Kenyan state and feel like they are treated as second-rate citizens. Data collection and analysis Data for the conflict snapshot COVID-19 series in Kenya was airoi gathered from 21-25 September in the following target zones: arissa This coincided with a period of relative calm in terms of ana iver COVID-19 caseloads and containment measures in Kenya, Kilifi as it fell in between the first and second wave of outbreaks omasa and many people believed there would soon be a return to normalcy. This perception may have influenced certain survey wale responses and we expect to see changes in this in the next round of snapshot reports. This report was prepared by the Search for Common Ground Kenya team, with support from Search’s COVID-19 Response Programming Team and Institutional Learning Team. For more information on the data collection methodology and tools used by Search for Common Ground for this research, click here.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Procurement Plan I. General Public Disclosure Authorized 1. Bank’s approval Date of the procurement Plan: March 17, 2017 2. Date of General Procurement Notice: May 4, 2015 3. Period covered by this procurement plan: March 2017 to Feb 2018 II. Goods, Works, Consultant and Non-Consulting Services. 1. Prior Review Threshold: Procurement Decisions subject to Prior Review by the Bank as stated in Appendix 1 to the Guidelines for Procurement: Type of Procurement Prior Review Comments Threshold (PRT) US$ (Millions) 1. Works (Including turnkey, supply & 15 Moderate risk Public Disclosure Authorized installation of plant and equipment and PPP) 2. (Goods; Information Technology & Non- 4 Moderate risk Consulting Services) 3. Consultant Services (Firms) 2 Moderate risk 4. Consultant Services (Individual Consultants) 0.4 Moderate risk 2. Prequalification. NA 3. Proposed Procedures for CDD Components (as per paragraph. 3.17 of the Guidelines: NA 4. Reference to (if any) Project Operational/Procurement Manual: Available in Project files 5. Any Other Special Procurement Arrangements: NA Public Disclosure Authorized 6. Short list comprising entirely of national consultants: Short list of consultants for services, estimated to cost less than $300,000_equivalent per contract, may comprise entirely of national consultants in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 2.7 of the Consultant Guidelines. 7. All TORs for the procurement of consultants services irrespective of the estimated cost of the assignment shall be reviewed and cleared by the TTL 8. Operating expenditures are neither subject to the Procurement and Consultant Guidelines nor prior or post reviews. Operating expenditures are normally verified by TTLs and FM specialists and obtained using the Borrower’s national procurement and administrative procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Charcoal Grey Market in Kenya, Uganda and South Sudan (2021)
    COMMODITY REPORT BLACK GOLD The charcoal grey market in Kenya, Uganda and South Sudan SIMONE HAYSOM I MICHAEL McLAGGAN JULIUS KAKA I LUCY MODI I KEN OPALA MARCH 2021 BLACK GOLD The charcoal grey market in Kenya, Uganda and South Sudan ww Simone Haysom I Michael McLaggan Julius Kaka I Lucy Modi I Ken Opala March 2021 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank everyone who gave their time to be interviewed for this study. They would like to extend particular thanks to Dr Catherine Nabukalu, at the University of Pennsylvania, and Bryan Adkins, at UNEP, for playing an invaluable role in correcting our misperceptions and deepening our analysis. We would also like to thank Nhial Tiitmamer, at the Sudd Institute, for providing us with additional interviews and information from South Sudan at short notice. Finally, we thank Alex Goodwin for excel- lent editing. Interviews were conducted in South Sudan, Uganda and Kenya between February 2020 and November 2020. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Simone Haysom is a senior analyst at the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime (GI-TOC), with expertise in urban development, corruption and organized crime, and over a decade of experience conducting qualitative fieldwork in challenging environments. She is currently an associate of the Oceanic Humanities for the Global South research project based at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg. Ken Opala is the GI-TOC analyst for Kenya. He previously worked at Nation Media Group as deputy investigative editor and as editor-in-chief at the Nairobi Law Monthly. He has won several journalistic awards in his career.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya Malaria General Malaria Information: Predominantly P
    Kenya Malaria General malaria information: predominantly P. falciparum. Transmission occurs throughout the year, with extremely high transmission in most counties surrounding Lake Victoria. Some areas with low or no transmission may only be accessible by transiting areas where chemoprophylaxis is recommended. Location-specific recommendations: Chemoprophylaxis is recommended for all travelers: elevations below 2,500 m (8,200 ft), including all coastal resorts and safari itineraries; all cities and towns within these areas (including Nairobi). No preventive measures are necessary (no evidence of transmission exists): elevations above 2,500 m. Preventive measures: Travelers should observe insect precautions from dusk to dawn in areas with any level of transmission. Atovaquone-proguanil (Malarone or generic), doxycycline, mefloquine, and tafenoquine are protective in this country. G6PD testing is required prior to tafenoquine use. 34°E 37°E 40°E 43°E NUMBERED COUNTIES 5°N SOUTH Ilemi 1 - Nairobi 25 - Kakamega 2 - Kajiado SUDAN Triangle ETHIOPIA 26 - Vihiga 3 - Makueni 27 - Nandi Lokichogio 4 - Machakos 28 - Baringo " 5 - Embu 29 - Elgeyo/Marakwet Lake Sibiloi N.P. 6 - Tharaka-Nithi Turkana 30 - Uasin Gishu 7 - Meru 31 - Bungoma " 37 8 - Kirinyaga 32 - Trans Nzoia Moyale Lodwar 9 - Murang'a 33 - West Pokot " 36 El 10 - Kiambu 34 - Turkana Wak " 11 - Nyeri 35 - Samburu T u r Marsabit 12 - Laikipia k 36 - Marsabit w N.P. e Marsabit 13 - Nyandarua 37 - Mandera l " 34 14 - Nakuru 38 - Wajir 2°N m ua M 15 - Narok 39 - Isiolo UGANDA S a Wajir l Losai m " 16 - Bomet 40 - Kitui a N.P. l t 33 e 38 17 - Nyamira 41 - Tana River 35 39 18 - Kisii 42 - Garissa 32 29 SOMALIA 19 - Migori 43 - Lamu 28 Samburu N.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Mombasa County Crime and Violence Report
    MOMBASA COUNTY CRIME AND VIOLENCE RAPID ASSESSMENT MOMBASA COUNTY CRIME AND VIOLENCE RAPID ASSESSMENT Cover photo credit: Andrea Albini | Creative Commons 3.0 Design and copy editing: Laura C. Johnson II Contents Foreword .................................................v Acknowledgements .........................................vi Acronyms ................................................vii 1 Introduction .............................................1 Crime and Violence Prevention in Kenya ...............................3 Crime and Violence Prevention Training ...............................4 County-Level Crime and Violence Prevention ..........................4 Framework for Analysis .............................................7 Goals of the Rapid Assessment ......................................9 Methodology . .9 2 Background: Crime and Violence Trends in Kenya ............13 Boda-Boda-Related Crime and Violence .............................14 Alcohol and Drug Abuse ...........................................14 Sexual and Gender-Based Violence ..................................16 Violence against Children ..........................................16 Radicalization and Recruitment into Violent Extremism ..................17 3 Rapid Assessment of Mombasa County .....................19 Overview of County ...............................................19 Cross-Cutting Drivers of Crime and Violence ..........................20 Dynamics of Crime and Violence ....................................23 Security Interventions .............................................40
    [Show full text]
  • (Nema)Table of Contents
    ENVIR ONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT (ESIA) AND RESETLEMENT ACTION PLAN (RAP) FOR THE PROPSED MALINDI AIRPORT RUNWAY EXPANSION PROJECT TENDER NO. KAA/OT/MLD/1507/2018/2019 NOVEMBER, 2020 KENYA AIRPORTS AUTHORITY ESIA and RAP report for the proposed Extension of Malindi Airport Runway CERTIFICATION This ESIA study report has been prepared in accordance with the Environmental Management and Coordination Act (EMCA) 1999 and the Environmental (Impact Assessment and Audit) Regulations 2003 for submission to the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA). The following experts conducted the study and prepared this report on behalf of Eco-solutions Limited: FOR Eco Solutions Limited, iPlan Consult (Int’l) Limited, P.O. BOX 20492 – 00100, P.O BOX 28634-00100 NAIROBI, KENYA. NAIROBI. TEL: +254 722 273935. TEL: +254 721891005. Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Name Designation NEMA Date & Signature REG. NO. 1. SHADRACK K. MBUTA EIA LEAD EXPERT 6315 2. WALLACE ISABOKE EIA LEAD EXPERT 2622 3. CYNTHIA OTARA ASS. EXPERT 11450 The Proponent; Kenya Airports Authority (KAA), P.O. Box 19001-00501, Nairobi. Signature___________________________ Date_____________________________ Designation: Environment Manager Disclaimer: This ESIA Report is confidential to Kenya Airports Authority (KAA), and any use of the materials hereof should be strictly in accordance with the contractual agreement between Eco-solutions and Kenya Airports Authority (KAA). It is, however, subject to conditions spelt out in the Environmental (Impact Assessment and Audit) Regulations, 2003. Eco Solutions Ltd; iPlan Consult (Int’l) Limited November 2020 2 KENYA AIRPORTS AUTHORITY ESIA and RAP report for the proposed Extension of Malindi Airport Runway EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Out Patient Facilities for Nhif Supa Cover Baringo County Bomet County Bungoma County Busia County
    OUT PATIENT FACILITIES FOR NHIF SUPA COVER BARINGO COUNTY BRANCH No HOSPITAL NAME POSTAL ADDRESS OFFICE 1 TIONYBEI MEDICAL CLINIC 396-30400, KABARNET KABARNET 2 BARINGO DISTRICT HOSPITAL (KABARNET) 21-30400, KABARNET KABARNET 3 REALE MEDICAL CENTRE-KABARNET 4694-30100, ELDORET KABARNET 4 KERIO HOSPITAL LTD 458-30400, KABARNET KABARNET 5 RAVINE GLORY HEALTH CARE SERVICES 612-20103, ELDAMA RAVINE KABARNET 6 ELDAMA RAVINE NURSING HOME 612-20103, ELDAMA RAVINE KABARNET 7 BARNET MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTRE 490-30400, KABARNET KABARNET BOMET COUNTY BRANCH No HOSPITAL NAME POSTAL ADDRESS OFFICE 1 CHELYMO MEDICAL CENTRE 37-20422 SILIBWET BOMET 2 KAPKOROS HEALTH CENTRE 20400 BOMET BOMET BUNGOMA COUNTY BRANCH No HOSPITAL NAME POSTAL ADDRESS OFFICE 1 CHWELE SUBCOUNTY HOSPITAL 202 - 50202 CHWELE BUNGOMA 2 LUMBOKA MEDICAL SERVICES 1883 - 50200 BUNGOMA BUNGOMA 3 WEBUYE HEALTH CENTRE 25 - WEBUYE BUNGOMA 4 ST JAMES OPTICALS 2141 50200 BUNGOMA 5 NZOIA MEDICAL CENTRE 471 - 50200 BUNGOMA BUNGOMA 6 TRINITY OPTICALS LIMITED PRIVATE BAG BUNGOMA BUNGOMA 7 KHALABA MEDICAL SERVICES 2211- 50200 BUNGOMA BUNGOMA 8 ARARAT MEDICAL CLINIC 332 KIMILILI BUNGOMA 9 SIRISIA SUBDISTRICT HOSPITAL 122 - 50208 SIRISIA BUNGOMA 10 NZOIA MEDICAL CENTRE - CHWELE 471 - 50200 BUNGOMA BUNGOMA 11 OPEN HEART MEDICAL CENTRE 388 - 50202 CHWELE BUNGOMA 12 ICFEM DREAMLAND MISSION HOSPITAL PRIVATE BAG KIMILILI BUNGOMA 13 EMMANUEL MISSION HEALTH CENTRE 53 - 50207 MISIKHU BUNGOMA 14 WEBUYE DISTRICT HOSPITAL 25 - 50205 BUNGOMA 15 ELGON VIEW MEDICAL COTTAGE 1747 - 50200 BUNGOMA BUNGOMA 16 FRIENDS
    [Show full text]
  • County Name County Code Location
    COUNTY NAME COUNTY CODE LOCATION MOMBASA COUNTY 001 BANDARI COLLEGE KWALE COUNTY 002 KENYA SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT MATUGA KILIFI COUNTY 003 PWANI UNIVERSITY TANA RIVER COUNTY 004 MAU MAU MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL LAMU COUNTY 005 LAMU FORT HALL TAITA TAVETA 006 TAITA ACADEMY GARISSA COUNTY 007 KENYA NATIONAL LIBRARY WAJIR COUNTY 008 RED CROSS HALL MANDERA COUNTY 009 MANDERA ARIDLANDS MARSABIT COUNTY 010 ST. STEPHENS TRAINING CENTRE ISIOLO COUNTY 011 CATHOLIC MISSION HALL, ISIOLO MERU COUNTY 012 MERU SCHOOL THARAKA-NITHI 013 CHIAKARIGA GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL EMBU COUNTY 014 KANGARU GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL KITUI COUNTY 015 MULTIPURPOSE HALL KITUI MACHAKOS COUNTY 016 MACHAKOS TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE MAKUENI COUNTY 017 WOTE TECHNICAL TRAINING INSTITUTE NYANDARUA COUNTY 018 ACK CHURCH HALL, OL KALAU TOWN NYERI COUNTY 019 NYERI PRIMARY SCHOOL KIRINYAGA COUNTY 020 ST.MICHAEL GIRLS BOARDING MURANGA COUNTY 021 MURANG'A UNIVERSITY COLLEGE KIAMBU COUNTY 022 KIAMBU INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY TURKANA COUNTY 023 LODWAR YOUTH POLYTECHNIC WEST POKOT COUNTY 024 MTELO HALL KAPENGURIA SAMBURU COUNTY 025 ALLAMANO HALL PASTORAL CENTRE, MARALAL TRANSZOIA COUNTY 026 KITALE MUSEUM UASIN GISHU 027 ELDORET POLYTECHNIC ELGEYO MARAKWET 028 IEBC CONSTITUENCY OFFICE - ITEN NANDI COUNTY 029 KAPSABET BOYS HIGH SCHOOL BARINGO COUNTY 030 KENYA SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT, KABARNET LAIKIPIA COUNTY 031 NANYUKI HIGH SCHOOL NAKURU COUNTY 032 NAKURU HIGH SCHOOL NAROK COUNTY 033 MAASAI MARA UNIVERSITY KAJIADO COUNTY 034 MASAI TECHNICAL TRAINING INSTITUTE KERICHO COUNTY 035 KERICHO TEA SEC. SCHOOL
    [Show full text]