“Are Civil Servants Different Because They Are Civil Servants ?”

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

“Are Civil Servants Different Because They Are Civil Servants ?” Ministère de la Fonction publique et de la Réforme administrative “Are civil servants different because they are civil servants ?” Luxembourg, June 2005 Dr Christoph Demmke Associate Professor Etude réalisée pour les besoins de la 44e réunion des Directeurs généraux de la Fonctionpublique des Etats membres de l’Union européenne 1 Are civil servants different because they are civil servants? Christoph Demmke 1. Introduction.......................................................................................................4 1.1. The end of a specific civil service? From the beginnings until the 21st century .................. 4 1.2 Objective of this study and methodology........................................................................... 6 2. Do organisations matter? Are public organisations different to private organisations?....................................................................................................9 2.1. Differences and similarities............................................................................................... 9 2.2. Performance in the public and private sector ....................................................................15 2.3 Different perceptions, different trust and different images ................................................18 2.4. Difference between image and attractiveness. Attractive public services without a good image?.............................................................................................................................22 3. Are there differences within the public service? Civil servants and other public employees..............................................................................................26 3.1. The difficult distinction between civil servants and other public employees......................27 3.2. Are various tasks being performed only by civil servants (public powers)?.......................37 3.3. Preliminary conclusions...................................................................................................42 4. Are civil servants different because they are civil servants? .........................43 4.1. The link between organisational structures and personality...............................................45 5. Differences between public employees and private employees......................50 5.1. Are civil servants more neutral and impartial than others? ................................................51 5.2. Why should civil servants be different at all? Should they be different?............................53 5.2.1 Arguments for differences between public and private employees .................................54 5.2.2. The civil servant as a dying species. Arguments why civil servants should not be different.......................................................................................................................56 6. Is public and private sector motivation different?.........................................61 6.1. The problem with motivational theory..............................................................................61 6.2. Are persons who are applying for public service jobs different?........................................62 6.3. Is there a specific public sector motivation? .....................................................................65 6.3.1. Introduction.................................................................................................................65 6.3.2. Different motivations between public and private employees ........................................66 6.3.3. Being job-security minded and other specific features of civil servants behaviour .........71 6.3.4. New evidence – no differences at all?...........................................................................72 6.4. Motivation and Pay..........................................................................................................73 7. Work Satisfaction............................................................................................80 7.1. Differences exist, but they are not significant ...................................................................80 7.2. Conclusions.....................................................................................................................85 2 8. Concerning rigidity and rules.........................................................................87 8.1. Civil Servants – are they bound by too many rules?..........................................................87 9. The performance of civil servants – better or worse than other employees? 92 9.1. Changing emphasis: the link between performance, quality, competitiveness and politics ............................................................................................................................92 9.2. The complexities of performance management in public service.......................................93 9.3. What do we know about performance?.............................................................................97 9.4. Working hard or hardly working? Concerning high and poor performance........................98 10. Job security as instrument in the fight against external pressure ............... 102 10.1. Job security versus external pressure..............................................................................102 10.2. Job security as motivational instrument..........................................................................104 11. What would happen if the civil service status were to be abolished?.......... 107 11.1. Looking for benchmarks: The privatisation of the public service and the case of Georgia (USA) ..............................................................................................................110 12. Conclusions: civil servants as ordinary people?........................................... 114 13. Annexes- questionnaire: Are Civil Servants Different Because They Are Civil Servants?............................................................................................... 121 3 1. Introduction 1.1. The end of a specific civil service? From the beginnings until the 21st century For a lengthy period, European societies believed that civil servants were linked to the authority of the state and could not be compared to employees in the private sector. This group of public employees were seen as agents intended to uphold the rule of law and to implement government policies. Consequently, civil servants had to have high standards of integrity and be entrusted with a single task: working for the common interest. In this conception, where the state was separated from society and citizens, it was inconceivable that civil servants should have the right to strike or the right to conclude collective working conditions agreements. After the Second World War, the tasks of the state evolved (especially in the social and education sector) and more and more people were recruited as civil servants. Consequently, public employment reached a new peak in the late 1970s and early 1980s. However, as a consequence of the broadening of the public sector, it also became also less clear why civil-service positions in the field of education, research, and social security, for example, should be treated differently to those in the private sector. This expansion of the civil services and – in many cases – the preferential treatment of civil servants (especially as regards job security and social security provisions) have improved the attractiveness of public service employment but not necessarily the image of the public services. In fact, citizens, media and politicians have expressed more and more dissatisfaction with the public sector and with civil servants in general and campaign against the bureaucrats and expensive, slow, inefficient, and unresponsive bureaucracies. As a result, it has become more and more difficult to argue why certain features of the traditional public services, such as pay, social security, working conditions, working time, the right to strike and social dialogue, etc., should be distinct from those in the private sector. Today, one of the most important challenges for almost all European public services is budgetary constraints. Often, public services are considered too expensive, inefficient, over-regulated, and ineffective. The Lisbon agenda, in particular, plays an important role in this discussion. Consequently, solutions should aim at greater efficiency, effectiveness and fewer – or better – rules. The downside of this discussion is that positive features of national public services may not discussed sufficiently and civil servants are seen as cost factors and less as positive contributors to effective public organisations. The early 21st century has seen the introduction of new popular concepts such as governance, change management, knowledge management, life-long learning and new public management. In addition, in many civil services, decentralisation trends have been introduced, organisational structures and recruitment procedures have been changed, budgets reduced, working time patterns have been modified, performance management systems adopted, senior officials are appointed for a definite period of 4 time, pay and pension systems have been reformed and – more generally – alignment trends between the public and private sector have been pursued. To this should be added the impact of the European integration process on the public services and liberalisation and privatisation in the field of the
Recommended publications
  • The Chinese Civil Service Examination's Impact on Confucian Gender Roles
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository College of Arts & Sciences Senior Honors Theses College of Arts & Sciences 5-2015 The Chinese civil service examination's impact on Confucian gender roles. Albert Oliver Bragg University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/honors Part of the Asian History Commons, and the History of Gender Commons Recommended Citation Bragg, Albert Oliver, "The Chinese civil service examination's impact on Confucian gender roles." (2015). College of Arts & Sciences Senior Honors Theses. Paper 71. http://doi.org/10.18297/honors/71 This Senior Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts & Sciences at ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Arts & Sciences Senior Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Chinese Civil Service Examination’s Impact on Confucian Gender Roles By Albert Oliver Bragg Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for Graduation summa cum laude University of Louisville May 2015 Bragg 2 Introduction The Chinese Civil Service Examination was an institution that lasted virtually uninterrupted for roughly thirteen-hundred years, beginning during the late Sui Dynasty in 587 C.E. and ending in 1904 shortly before the collapse of the Qing Dynasty1. While the structure and number of examinations varied widely from dynasty to dynasty, the fundamental content of the examinations was to test one’s knowledge of the Confucian classics: The Analects, The Book of Mencius, The Book of Changes, The Book of Documents, The Book of Poetry, The Book of Rites, and the Tso Chuan.
    [Show full text]
  • Determinants and Consequences of Bureaucrat Effectiveness: Evidence
    Determinants and Consequences of Bureaucrat Effectiveness: Evidence from the Indian Administrative Service∗ Marianne Bertrand, Robin Burgess, Arunish Chawla and Guo Xu† October 21, 2015 Abstract Do bureaucrats matter? This paper studies high ranking bureaucrats in India to examine what determines their effectiveness and whether effective- ness affects state-level outcomes. Combining rich administrative data from the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) with a unique stakeholder survey on the effectiveness of IAS officers, we (i) document correlates of individual bureaucrat effectiveness, (ii) identify the extent to which rigid seniority-based promotion and exit rules affect effectiveness, and (iii) quantify the impact of this rigidity on state-level performance. Our empirical strategy exploits variation in cohort sizes and age at entry induced by the rule-based assignment of IAS officers across states as a source of differential promotion incentives. JEL classifica- tion: H11, D73, J38, M1, O20 ∗This project represents a colloboration between the Lal Bahadur Shastri National Academy of Administration (LBSNAA), the University of Chicago and London School of Economics. We are grateful to Padamvir Singh, the former Director of LBSNAA for his help with getting this project started. The paper has benefited from seminar/conference presentations at Berkeley, Bocconi, CEPR Public Economics Conference, IGC Political Economy Conference, LBSNAA, LSE, NBER India Conference, Stanford and Stockholm University. †Marianne Bertrand [University of Chicago Booth School of Business: Mari- [email protected]]; Robin Burgess [London School of Economics (LSE) and the International Growth Centre (IGC): [email protected]]; Arunish Chawla [Indian Administrative Service (IAS)]; Guo Xu [London School of Economics (LSE): [email protected]] 1 1 Introduction Bureaucrats are a core element of state capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepotism and Meritocracy
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Göteborgs universitets publikationer - e-publicering och e-arkiv NEPOTISM AND MERITOCRACY ANDERS SUNDELL WORKING PAPER SERIES 2014:16 QOG THE QUALITY OF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTE Department of Political Science University of Gothenburg Box 711, SE 405 30 GÖTEBORG December 2014 ISSN 1653-8919 © 2014 by Anders Sundell. All rights reserved. Nepotism and meritocracy Anders Sundell QoG Working Paper Series 2014:16 December 2014 ISSN 1653-8919 ABSTRACT Despite the crucial importance of a well-functioning and impartial public administration for growth and well-being, we know little of how such bureaucracies can be created, and why elites allow them to be. One reason for this dearth of studies is that there are few to none quantitative measures of historical bureaucratic development. This paper analyzes the surnames of civil servants in the Swe- dish central public administration over 200 years to track nepotism in recruitment. A decline in nepotism is registered during the 19th century. The nobility however continued to thrive in the ad- ministration even after reform, due to disproportionate access to education. Paradoxically, birth was thus an important predictor of success in a system that generally was considered meritocratic. This continuity could explain why the old elite accepted reform.1 Anders Sundell The Quality of Government Institute Department of Political Science University of Gothenburg [email protected] 1 The author wishes to thank Andreas Bågenholm, Heather Congdon Fors, Carl Dahlström, Mikael Gilljam, Jenny de Fine Licht, Victor Lapuente, Martin Sjöstedt and seminar participants at University of Gothenburg and Lund University for valuable input during the preparation of this manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of Meritocracy in the Public Sector of Kazakhstan
    IMPLEMENTATION OF MERITOCRACY IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR OF KAZAKHSTAN by Nargis Saginova A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Public Administration at NAZARBAYEV UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF PUBIC POLICY ʼ ASTANA 2017 ABSTRACT Kazakhstan's ultimate goal for the next 20 years is to become one of the most economically successful top 30 countries in the world. In order to get onto that list, the President of the country, on a regular basis, sets goals that should be achieved by politicians, businessmen, scholars, students and others. One of the latest goals was the introduction of 5 reforms in 2015 that included a huge transformation of the civil service. The reform was aimed at creating a professional and effective civil service free from corruption, nepotism, and tribalism, with bright leaders who will guide the country towards success and prosperity. Thus, political stability will gradually result in economic success. The focus of the civil service reform was the implementation of principles of meritocracy. Meritocracy guarantees that access to the civil service will be equally given to everyone interested in working for the government and who has the proper qualifications. Promotion should be based on their merits ignoring things like subjectivism, nepotism, corruption etc. On the basis of the reforms, the government has introduced new law ‘On civil service’. Thus the main objective of this thesis paper is to investigate whether the principle of meritocracy has been introduced and implemented in the civil service of Kazakhstan. Using the example of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Kazakhstan I have researched whether the results of this process have been successful or not.
    [Show full text]
  • TESTING the SCHOLARS How Do You Choose Who Runs a Dynasty? Why Do People Seek Power?
    TESTING THE SCHOLARS How do you choose who runs a dynasty? Why do people seek power? ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION Students will explore the classical Chinese civil servants exam system, compare it to / EDUCATOR their current exam systems, and construct their own ideas of what it means to be qualified for a role and how to prove qualification. If you are planning to use this as part of a visit to The Field Museum, see the Page field trip guide on page 7. 1 of BACKGROUND 7 INFORMATION Image: During the Qing Dynasty, students took the civil service examination in door-less cells. Running an empire required a network of The only furniture was a set of boards that could be arranged as a desk and bench or a bed. dedicated and well-educated officials. The men Illustration by Sayaka Isowa for The Field Museum. who governed the empire had to pass a grueling exam. For roughly 1,300 years, China’s emperors used the civil toe, twice. Their supplies, carried in baskets like service examination system to identify talented men for the ones in the drawing above, were searched. It’s government service. Stationed throughout the empire, said that guards even checked inside dumplings. scholar-officials maintained order and reported back to Yet some test-takers found ways to smuggle in help. the emperor on local events. This system was so effective, The museum holds examples of silk cloth covered in even foreign dynasties like the Manchus embraced it writing, cheat sheets that could have been sewn into during the Qing Dynasty (AD 1644-1911).
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Service Entry Level Police Exam Frequently Asked Questions
    Civil Service Entry Level Police Exam Frequently Asked Questions Basic Requirements of the Exam: Who can take the Municipal or Transit Entry-level Police Exam? Education/Experience Requirement: As of the date of appointment, candidates must have either a high school diploma or equivalency certificate approved by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education or three years of experience in the armed forces of the United States with last release or discharge under honorable conditions. Age Requirement: Pursuant to Massachusetts General Law (M.G.L.) Chapter 31, § 58, candidates must be 19 years of age on or before the first date the examination is being administered for municipal firefighter, police officer and transit police officer. Candidates are also required to be at least 21 years of age by the date of appointment as a municipal police officer or transit police officer. Please review the list of Civil Service departments to identify those that may have an upper age limit: Civil Service Police Departments. Who can take the State Trooper Entry-level Exam? Education Requirement: Candidates must have a high school diploma or equivalency certificate approved by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Age Requirement: In order to take the examination for State Trooper and pursuant to M.G.L. Chapter 22C , § 10 , candidates must be at least 21 years of age and less than 35 years old as of the last date to file an application for an examination. How much does it cost to take an exam and are there hardship exceptions? The combined examination fee for Municipal Police Officer and State Trooper is $150.
    [Show full text]
  • 7: GERMANY Dr
    7: GERMANY Dr. Elke Löffler, Public Sector Consultant, Birmingham, UK Overviewi The New Public Management approaches pursued in New Zealand and the UK have evoked little interest in the central or federal governments of some major and successful economies, notably Germany and Japan. Public demand for service improvements in Germany was considerably less than in the UK and other New Public Management countries, arguably at least partly because the baseline of public service quality was perceived by citizens as higher. As a result, there was no real perceived need to engage in radical public sector reforms in Germany. Furthermore, the strong legalistic tradition of the German public administration, when taken together with the strong position of trade unions and staff councils and the decentralized structure of the German federalist system, also encouraged gradual reforms, and gradual reforms based on pilots and employee involvement. In Germany, the public management agenda of the early 1990s was dominated by the Unification process and related public sector transformation policies that imposed the structure and principles of West German public administration on the new Laender, the former East Germany. Only later, with the fiscal crisis that resulted from Unification was there some wider interest in New Public Management approaches within the German public sector. There has since been a degree of bottom-up experimentation with certain elements of New Public Management reforms at local levels in Germany. Subsequently the Laender, as well as some Federal agencies, have shown some interest in pursuing managerial reforms. But given the more equal balance between the legislative, judicial and executive branches in the German system as compared to Westminster-system countries, the pursuit of managerial reforms should not have been expected to – and did not in practice – override the prevailing fundamental legal and political processes in the German system.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Organizational Demography of the Qing Civil Service Cameron Campbell1, Bijia Chen, James Z. Lee (HKUST) the Qing Dynasty (
    The Organizational Demography of the Qing Civil Service Cameron Campbell1, Bijia Chen, James Z. Lee (HKUST) The Qing dynasty (1644-1911) civil service was one of the largest and most important ‘modern’ organizations anywhere before the twentieth century. By modern, we mean that it was highly centralized, had well-articulated procedures for hiring, evaluation and promotion, and had clearly- defined requirements for the qualifications of its employees. A large subset of its employees were selected based on their performance on standardized examinations. It consisted of 13,000-15,000 officials at any given time, and they administered a country with an area similar to that of the continental United States and with a population that ranged from 150,000,000 at the beginning of the Qing to 400,000,000 at the end of the Qing. The employees of such a large organization represent a population in its own right, with structure and dynamics determined by patterns of entry, promotion and exit. New hires are analogous to births, length of service analogous to age, and exits from employment analogous to death. Meanwhile, the population was internally differentiated on a number of characteristics, including bureaucratic rank, qualifications and basis of appointment. These subgroups had different rates of promotion and eventually exit that helped shape the overall composition of the civil service. We have a unique opportunity to analyze the Qing civil service as a population because we have complete records of almost all civil servants between 1850-1912. Since 2014, we have been constructing a database on Qing officials called the China Government Employee Database – CGED-Q.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2007-08
    THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Civil Service Commission Annual Report Annual Report Fiscal Year 2006–07 Fiscal Year 2007–08 1 THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCIscO 2 Civil Service Commission Civil Service Commission Commission Staff Donald A. Casper Anita Sanchez PRESIDENT (ELEctED JUNE 2, 2008) EXECUTIVE OFFICER Morgan R. Gorrono Sandra Eng VICE PRESIDENT AssIstANT EXECUTIVE OFFICER Alicia D. Becerril Luz Morganti COmmISSIONER SENIOR PERSONNEL ANALYst Mary Y. Jung Elizabeth Aldana COmmISSIONER ADMINISTRATIVE AssISTANT Yu-Yee Wu Sheridan Lizzette Henríquez COmmISSIONER RULES, PERSONNEL & OFFICE COORDINATOR Gloria Sheppard AppEALS COORDINATOR Annual Report Fiscal Year 2007–08 3 THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCIscO 4 Civil Service Commission Table of Contents Mission and Vision ................................................................................................................................................................................................................7 Highlights of Fiscal Year 2007-08 ..................................................................................................................................................................................8 The Commission Members ...........................................................................................................................................................................................10 Membership ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Police Officer
    ANNOUNCEMENT FOR ENTRY LEVEL POLICE OFFICER CIVIL SERVICE EXAMINATION AND SELECTION PROCESS Application Period: Currently Open until a Civil Service Listing is created. Written Test Date: The written examination is offered through National Testing Networks throughout the United States. You must register prior to reporting to the testing facility. To register, go to www.nationaltestingnetwork.com. The closest testing location to Troy is: Edison Community College 1973 Edison Drive East Hall – Room 456 Troy, Ohio 45356 A complete list of locations and examination dates and times are also available through www.nationaltestingnetwork.com. The City of Troy is an equal opportunity employer. 1 WRITTEN TEST: The written examination will be approximately two to two and one half hours in length. All applicants must identify themselves w i t h a state issued driver’s license or military I D w i t h a photograph of the applicant. The use of cellular phones will be prohibited during the examination. No cellular phones, taping video, or picture taking devices will be allowed in the testing room. The written examination is intended to assess the applicant's ability to successfully perform the duties of a police officer. The organization conducting the written examination shall ensure that no applicant, employee of the City of Troy, or member of the Civil Service Commission has knowledge of or gains access to any examination prior to the administration of the examination. The minimum passing score shall be a grade of seventy percent (70%). An applicant not achieving the minimum passing score will be eliminated from consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting Performance and Professionalism in the Public Service
    SIGMA Papers No. 21 Promoting Performance and Professionalism OECD in the Public Service https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kml615rm5mv-en Promoting Performance and Professionalism in the Public Service SIGMA Papers No. 21 1 THE SIGMA PROGRAMME SIGMA -- Support for Improvement in Governance and Management in Central and Eastern European Countries -- is a joint initiative of the OECD Centre for Co-operation with the Economies in Transition and the European Union’s Phare Programme. The initiative supports public administration reform efforts in thirteen countries in transition, and is financed mostly by Phare. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development is an intergovernmental organisation of 29 democracies with advanced market economies. The Centre channels the Organisation’s advice and assistance over a wide range of economic issues to reforming countries in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. Phare provides grant financing to support its partner countries in Central and Eastern Europe to the stage where they are ready to assume the obligations of membership of the European Union. Phare and SIGMA serve the same countries: Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia. Established in 1992, SIGMA works within the OECD’s Public Management Service, which provides information and expert analysis on public management to policy-makers and facilitates contact and exchange of experience
    [Show full text]
  • Becoming a Foreign Service Officer
    I am diplomacy. I am America. Becoming a Foreign Service Officer E PL M UR U I B U N S U I am diplomacy. I am America. Becoming a Foreign Service Specialist E PL M UR U I B U N S U TABLE OF CONTENTS Diplomacy at Work 3 Foreign Service Lifestyle Becoming a U.S. Diplomat Candidate Resources Eight Steps to Becoming a Foreign Service Officer (FSO) 5 1. Choose a Career Track The Five Career Tracks Consular Officers Economic Officers Management Officers Political Officers Public Diplomacy Officers 2. Register for the Foreign Service Officer Test (FSOT) Eligibility Requirements FSOT Registration Step-by-Step Instructions Important Registration Information Registrants With Disabilities Application Requirements for Any Type of Disability Additional Documentation Requirements for Diagnosis of Cognitive (Learning) Disability 3. Take the Foreign Service Officer Test (FSOT) What To Expect on the FSOT Test Center Admission and Regulations Obtaining Your FSOT Results Frequently Asked Questions 4. Submit Personal Narratives for the QEP Review 5. Take the Foreign Service Oral Assessment 6. Clearances: Medical and Security 7. Suitability Review Panel 8. The Register Additional Consideration Factors 25 Other Important Information 26 Entry-Level Salary Range Training Tenuring and Commissioning Data Collection of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) 26 Sample FSOT Questions 27 Diplomacy@Work The U.S. Department of State promotes peace, prosperity and stability in areas of vital interest to America. Working with allies and partners around the world, American diplomats tackle global issues ranging from climate change to trafficking in persons. The Department is a key player in supporting democratic development.
    [Show full text]