Evaluation of the CAP Measures Applicable to the Wine Sector

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evaluation of the CAP Measures Applicable to the Wine Sector Evaluation of the CAP measures applicable to the wine sector Case study report: France – Languedoc-Roussillon Written by Agrosynergie EEIG Agrosynergie November – 2018 Groupement Européen d’Intérêt Economique AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development Directorate C – Strategy, simplification and policy analysis Unit C.4 – Monitoring and Evaluation E-mail: [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels EUROPEAN COMMISSION Evaluation of the CAP measures applicable to the wine sector Case study report: France – Languedoc-Roussilon Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development 2018 EN Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE The information and views set out in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2019 Catalogue number: KF-04-18-986-EN-N ISBN: 978-92-79-97415-1 doi: 10.2762/609285 © European Union, 2018 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Images © Agrosynergie, 2018 EEIG AGROSYNERGIE is formed by the following companies: ORÉADE-BRÈCHE Sarl & COGEA S.r.l. 64 Chemin del prat Via Po 102 31320, Auzeville FRANCE 00198 Roma ITALIE Tel. : + 33 5 61 73 62 62 Tel. : + 39 6 853 73 518 Fax : + 33 5 61 73 62 90 Fax : + 39 6 855 78 65 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Represented by: Represented by: Thierry CLEMENT Francesca ANTILICI This case study was carried out by the following Oréade-Brèche experts: Alice Devot, Laurence Menet, Juliette Augier, Pierre Milliard, Juliane Papuchon, Alexandre Lyse and Benjamin Berizzi Table of contents 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE WINE SECTOR IN LANGUEDOC ROUSSILLON ................................................................ 1 1.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 STRUCTURE OF THE SECTOR ............................................................................................................ 3 1.3 STATISTICS AT CASE STUDY LEVEL ..................................................................................................... 4 2. THEME 1: NATIONAL SUPPORT PROGRAMMES ............................................................................................. 7 2.2 EFFECTS ON THE NSP AT THE LEVEL OF GROWERS ............................................................................... 10 2.3 EFFECTS OF THE NSP AT THE LEVEL OF PRODUCERS AND PRODUCTS ........................................................ 17 2.4 EFFECTS OF THE PROMOTION MEASURE ........................................................................................... 26 2.5 EFFECTS OF THE INFORMATION MEASURE ......................................................................................... 32 2.6 EFFICIENCY OF THE MANAGEMENT OF THE NSP ................................................................................. 34 2.7 COHERENCE OF THE NSP ............................................................................................................. 40 2.8 RELEVANCE OF THE NSP ............................................................................................................. 45 2.9 EU ADDED VALUE AND SUBSIDIARITY .............................................................................................. 49 3. THEME 2: SCHEME OF AUTHORISATIONS OF VINE PLANTINGS .................................................................... 51 3.1 SYNTHESIS OF THE INTERVIEWS ..................................................................................................... 51 3.2 CONCLUSION OF THE EXPERTS ....................................................................................................... 51 4. THEME 3: WINE PRODUCTS DEFINITION, RESTRICTIONS ON OENOLOGICAL PRACTICES AND AUTHORISED WINE GRAPE VARIETIES ......................................................................................................... 53 4.1 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION AT MEMBER STATE AND REGIONAL LEVEL ......................... 53 4.2 COMPETITIVENESS DISTORTIONS DUE TO SPECIFIC RULES ON OENOLOGICAL PRACTICES ................................. 54 4.3 SYNTHESIS OF THE INTERVIEWS ..................................................................................................... 55 4.4 COMMENTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE EXPERT ................................................................................. 59 5. THEME 4: EU RULES ON LABELLING AND PRESENTATION ............................................................................ 60 5.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE LABELLING RULES APPLIED AT MEMBER STATE AND LOCAL LEVEL ................................. 60 5.2 EXISTING NATIONAL DATA ON NON-COMPLIANCE WITH LABELLING RULES ................................................. 61 5.3 SYNTHESIS OF THE INTERVIEWS ..................................................................................................... 62 6. THEME 5: CERTIFICATION PROCEDURES, MONITORING AND CHECKS ......................................................... 66 6.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RULES ................................................................ 66 6.2 EXISTING NATIONAL DATA ON NON-COMPLIANCE AND WORKLOAD ......................................................... 70 6.3 SYNTHESIS OF THE INTERVIEWS ..................................................................................................... 70 7. LIST OF THE LITERATURE AND INTERVIEWS ................................................................................................. 73 ANNEX 1 – DESCRIPTION OF THE NSP MEASURES .................................................................................................. 75 AGROSYNERGIE – Case study report: France – Languedoc-Roussillon Evaluation of the impact of the CAP measures applicable to the wine sector i List of tables Table 1: Market shares of wine produced in Languedoc-Roussillon (2016) ................................................................. 4 Table 2: Area in vineyard and production in FRANCE ................................................................................................... 4 Table 3: Area in vineyard and production in LANGUEDOC ROUSSILLON ...................................................................... 4 Table 4: Number of wine growers in Languedoc-Roussillon ......................................................................................... 4 Table 5: Area by variety (ha) in Languedoc-Roussillon ................................................................................................. 5 Table 6: Planting rights.................................................................................................................................................. 5 Table 7: Budget allocation per measure on the first three years of the 2014-2018 NSP ............................................. 7 Table 8: Implementation choices on the promotion measure ..................................................................................... 7 Table 9: Implementation choices on the restructuring and conversion measure ........................................................ 8 Table 10: Implementation choices on the investment measure .................................................................................. 9 Table 11: Wine product covered by the legislation .................................................................................................... 10 Table 12: Implementation choices on the “by product distillation” measure ............................................................ 10 Table 13: Amount of aid granted per action in France ............................................................................................... 11 Table 14: List of varieties eligible under the individual restructuring measure .......................................................... 11 Table 15: List of varieties eligible under the collective restructuring plan established in Languedoc- Roussillon .................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Table 16: Volume of wine exported by type of wine products in 2017 ...................................................................... 27 Table 17: Value of wine exported by type of wine products in 2017 ......................................................................... 27 Table 18: Rate of achievement of the foreseen expenditures per measures ............................................................. 34 Table 19: Quantified objectives set in the draft NSP and monitoring in the implementation report 2016 ............... 34 Table 20: Main criteria/procedure(s) ensuring the relevance of the selected applications ....................................... 35 Table 21: SWOT
Recommended publications
  • Grenache: Best Practices and Potential for South Africa
    Grenache: Best Practices and Potential for South Africa Dissertation submitted to the Cape Wine Academy in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the diploma of Cape Wine Master by July 2014 i I, Martin Gomez Fernandez, declare that this dissertation is my own, unaided work. It is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the diploma of Cape Wine Master to the Cape Wine Academy. It has not been submitted before for qualification of examination in this or any other educational organization. Signed: _________________________________________ April 2015 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I am very grateful to my mentor Dr. Winifred Bowman CWM. Winnie, without your support I’ll have never walked this road. I’ll always be very greatful of your help and love. Thanks to my wife Ana and my parents Cruz and Martin for your patience and endless love. Thanks to Karin Visser for the many hours spent tasting wines together. Thanks to all the instructors I’ve had during my certificate and diploma courses at the Cape Wine Academy for sharing their passion and knowledge. Thanks to Fiona McDonald for your help making this text sharper and your good advice on the tasting exam. Thanks to all the Grenachistes, wine producers and viticulturalists, who so willingly welcomed me, contributed their wisdom, spent time with me tasting and shared their love for this grape variety: Adi Badenhorst, AA Badenhorst Family Wines, Paardeberg, Malmesbury, Swartland, South Africa Albert Jané and Elvira, Acústic Celler, Tarragona, Spain Angel Benito,
    [Show full text]
  • Establishment of a Local Map of AFLP Markers Around the Powdery
    Theor Appl Genet (2001) 103:1201–1210 © Springer-Verlag 2001 ORIGINAL ARTICLE J. Pauquet · A. Bouquet · P. This A.-F. Adam-Blondon Establishment of a local map of AFLP markers around the powdery mildew resistance gene Run1 in grapevine and assessment of their usefulness for marker assisted selection Received: 18 October 2000 / Accepted: 4 April 2001 Abstract The monogenic dominant genetic determinism ber of potentially damaging pathogens. Among the most of total resistance to powdery mildew, introduced from threatening are the powdery and downy mildews which Muscadinia rotundifolia into Vitis vinifera, was further were introduced during the 19th century together with assessed in BC4 and BC5 full-sib families. A BC5 popu- accessions of the American wild Vitis species in which lation of 157 individuals was used to select AFLP mark- they were endemic (Galet 1977). Powdery mildew is ers linked to the resistance gene, Run1. Thirteen AFLP caused by the fungus Uncinula necator (Schw. Burr.) markers were selected and a local map was constructed which is able to attack species in all the Vitaceae family around the Run1 gene. Ten markers among the 13 were (Boubals 1961). It was first described in 1845 in a green- found to co-segregate with the resistance gene. The use- house in Great-Britain and it rapidly spread into Europe, fulness of these 13 AFLP markers for the selection of causing severe yield losses (Galet 1977). It is now a Run1-carrying genotypes was further assessed through world-wide problem in viticulture. Despite the fungicidal their analysis in a set of 22 Run1-carrying resistant geno- effect of sulphur discovered in 1850 and considerable types and 16 susceptible genotypes.
    [Show full text]
  • Press-Kit-2015-CIVR
    PRESS PACK 2015 THE WINES OF ROUSSILLON www.winesofroussillon.com / www.vinsduroussillon.com Contact Eric ARACIL [email protected] - 1 - For free use. GEOGRAPHICAL SITUATION 4 A LAND BLESSED BY THE GODS 5 THE LEGACY OF THE ANCIENT GREEKS 5 THE SPREAD OF EXPORTS 6 THE RAPID EXPANSION OF THE VINEYARD 6 THE ERA OF RECOGNITION 7 SUD DE FRANCE/SOUTH OF FRANCE 8 GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO THE VINEYARDS 9 14 AOP, 3 IGP AND 23 VARIETALS: EXTERNAL SIGNS OF THE WEALTH OF WINES 10 A SOCIETY OF SMALL WINE GROWERS 10 VARIED TERROIRS 11 A – TO THE NORTH WEST OF THE TÊT RIVER, 11 B – TO THE NORTH EAST OF THE TÊT RIVER 12 C - TO THE SOUTH OF THE TÊT RIVER 13 D- THE BANYULS AND COLLIOURE AREA 13 THE IDEAL CLIMATE 14 23 VARIETALS FOR PEDIGREE WINES 15 WHITE AND GREY VARIETALS 15 GRENACHE BLANC 15 GRENACHE GRIS 15 MACABEU 15 MALVOISIE DU ROUSSILLON BLANCHE 16 MARSANNE 16 MUSCAT D’ALEXANDRIE 17 MUSCAT A PETITS GRAINS 17 ROUSSANNE 17 VERMENTINO 18 BLACK VARIETAL 18 CARIGNAN NOIR 18 GRENACHE NOIR 19 LLADONER PELUT 20 MOURVEDRE 20 SYRAH 21 WINE PRODUCTION 23 THE SECRET ALCHEMY OF THE VINS DOUX NATURELS 23 FROM LEGEND TO HISTORY 23 THE MYSTERIES OF MUTAGE 23 WITH TIME, A UNIQUE BOUQUET 24 THE AOP DRY WINES AND THE IGP 24 WINE MAKING TECHNIQUES ADAPTED TO THE TERROIRS AND VARIETALS 24 - 2 - For free use. 14 APPELLATIONS D’ORIGINE CONTROLEE 26 AOP VINS DOUX NATURELS 26 AOP RIVESALTES 26 AOP MUSCAT DE RIVESALTES 28 AOP MAURY DOUX 28 AOP BANYULS 29 AOP BANYULS GRAND CRU 30 AOP DRY WINES 30 AOP COTES DU ROUSSILLON 30 AOP COTES DU ROUSSILLON LES ASPRES : 31 AOP COTES DU ROUSSILLON VILLAGES 31 AOP MAURY SEC 32 AOP COLLIOURE 32 IGP CÔTES CATALANES AND CÔTE VERMEILLE 33 APPENDIX 1: DISHES AND THE WINES THAT COMPLEMENT THEM 35 APPENDIX 2: SPECIFICATIONS 37 APPENDIX 3 : 2014 HARVEST SUMMARY 52 APPENDIX 4 : OVERVIEW OF SALES 55 CONTACTS 57 - 3 - For free use.
    [Show full text]
  • Bubbles Btg/Btb
    BUBBLES BTG/BTB ANNE AMIE “Cuvée A Amrita” 2019 Pinot Blanc/ Riesling/ Muller Thurgau/ Viognier Willamette Valley, Oregon $40 LE VIGNE DI ALICE NV Boschera/ Verdiso/ Glera Veneto, Italy $50 CASTELLROIG Rosé Cava NV Trepat/ Garnaxta Penedès, Spain $55 PATTON VALLEY 2019 Pinot Noir (Rosé Pet Nat) Willamette Valley, Oregon $65 SZIGETI Brut NV Grűner Veltliner Burgenland, Austria $65 KEUSH Origins Brut NV Voskehat/ Khatouni Vayots Dzor, Armenia $65 NICOLAS FEUILLATTE Réserve Exclusive Brut NV $100 Pinot Noir/ Pinot Meunier/ Chardonnay Champagne, France GONET-MEDEVILLE Premier Cru Extra Brut Rosé NV Chardonnay/ Pinot Noir Champagne, France $155 ERIC RODEZ Grand Cru Blanc de Noirs NV Pinot Noir Champagne, France $175 ROSÉ VER SACRUM Clarete 2019 Grenache/ Syrah/ Marsanne Mendoza, Argentina $45 DAOU VINEYARDS 2020 Grenache/ Syrah Paso Robles, California $50 BAIA “Gvantas Wine” Aladasturi Imereti, Georgia $60 DOMAINE DE REUILLY 2018 Pinot Gris Loire Valley, France $65 NICOLAS CARMARANS 2019 “Minimus” Fer Servadou/ Négrette Languedoc-Roussillon, France $65 DIVISION “Gamine” 2019 Grenache (Pet Nat) Applegate Valley, Oregon $70 CLOS CIBONNE “Tibouren” 2017 Tibouren Provence, France $70 CHATEAU PRADEAUX Bandol 2019 Mourvedre/ Cinsault Provence, France $75 VENDING MACHINE Field Trip “Stock” 2018 Zweigelt/ Blaufrankisch/ St.Laurent/ Grüner Veltliner Willamette Valley, Oregon $75 CLOS DES GRILLONS “Une Ile” 2019 Mourvedre Loire Valley, France $85 ELS JELIPINS 2016 (Rosé) Sumoll Penedés, Spain $115 WHITE WINE VIÑA MAYU 2017 Pedro Ximenez Valle de Elqui,
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the Classification of Vine Varieties Has Become Difficult to Understand Because of the Large Whereas Article 31
    31 . 12 . 81 Official Journal of the European Communities No L 381 / 1 I (Acts whose publication is obligatory) COMMISSION REGULATION ( EEC) No 3800/81 of 16 December 1981 determining the classification of vine varieties THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Whereas Commission Regulation ( EEC) No 2005/ 70 ( 4), as last amended by Regulation ( EEC) No 591 /80 ( 5), sets out the classification of vine varieties ; Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, Whereas the classification of vine varieties should be substantially altered for a large number of administrative units, on the basis of experience and of studies concerning suitability for cultivation; . Having regard to Council Regulation ( EEC) No 337/79 of 5 February 1979 on the common organization of the Whereas the provisions of Regulation ( EEC) market in wine C1), as last amended by Regulation No 2005/70 have been amended several times since its ( EEC) No 3577/81 ( 2), and in particular Article 31 ( 4) thereof, adoption ; whereas the wording of the said Regulation has become difficult to understand because of the large number of amendments ; whereas account must be taken of the consolidation of Regulations ( EEC) No Whereas Article 31 of Regulation ( EEC) No 337/79 816/70 ( 6) and ( EEC) No 1388/70 ( 7) in Regulations provides for the classification of vine varieties approved ( EEC) No 337/79 and ( EEC) No 347/79 ; whereas, in for cultivation in the Community ; whereas those vine view of this situation, Regulation ( EEC) No 2005/70 varieties
    [Show full text]
  • Loire Valley
    PREVIEWCOPY Introduction Previewing this guidebook? If you are previewing this guidebook in advance of purchase, please check out our enhanced preview, which will give you a deeper look at this guidebook. Wine guides for the ultra curious, Approach Guides take an in-depth look at a wine region’s grapes, appellations and vintages to help you discover wines that meet your preferences. The Loire Valley — featuring a compelling line-up of distinctive grape varieties, high quality winemaking and large production volumes — is home to some of France’s most impressive wines. Nevertheless, it remains largely overlooked by the international wine drinking public. This makes the region a treasure trove of exceptional values, just waiting to be discovered. What’s in this guidebook • Grape varieties. We describe the Loire’s primary red and white grape varieties and where they reach their highest expressions. • Vintage ratings. We offer a straightforward vintage ratings table, which affords high-level insight into the best and most challenging years for wine production. • A Loire Valley wine label. We explain what to look for on a Loire Valley wine label and what it tells you about what’s in the bottle. • Map and appellation profiles. Leveraging our map of the region, we provide detailed pro- files of appellations from all five of the Loire’s sub-regions (running from west to east): Pays Nantais, Anjou, Saumur, Touraine and Central Vineyards. For each appellation, we describe the prevailing terroir, the types of wine produced and what makes them distinctive. • A distinctive approach. This guidebook’s approach is unique: rather than tell you what specific bottle of wine to order by providing individual bottle reviews, it gives the information you need to make informed wine choices on any list.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Vine Field Blends in California: a Review of Late 19Th Century Planting Practices in Californian Vineyards and Their Relevance to Today’S Viticulture
    Old Vine Field Blends in California: A review of late 19th century planting practices in Californian vineyards and their relevance to today’s viticulture. A research paper based upon Bedrock Vineyard, planted in 1888. © The Institute of Masters of Wine 2017. No part of this publication may be reproduced without permission. This publication was produced for private purpose and its accuracy and completeness is not guaranteed by the Institute. It is not intended to be relied on by third parties and the Institute accepts no liability in relation to its use. Table of Contents 1. Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 2. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 2 3. Situational Context.......................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Written Works on California Field Blends ............................................................... 4 3.2 International Use of Field-Blending ......................................................................... 4 3.3 Known Benefits of Co-fermentation ......................................................................... 6 4. Methodology ................................................................................................................... 8 4.1. Historic Primary Document Research ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fps Grape Program Newsletter
    FPS GRAPE PROGRAM NEWSLETTER fps.ucdavis.edu OCT O BER 2012 From the Director: A Fruitful Year of Expansion by Deborah Golino On May 4, 2012, Foundation An ongoing major initiative for Plant Services supporters the FPS grapevine program is celebrated the dedication of the new Foundation Vineyard the Trinchero Family Estates at Russell Ranch. On page Building. We greatly enjoyed 14, Mike Cunningham details having so many stakeholders the vineyard preparations, join us for this special event. vine training and impressive Dean Neal Van Alfen welcomed numbers of qualified grapevines our guests; among them were added in 2012. Such progress Bob and Roger Trinchero In Progress: Trinchero Family Estates Building at FPS attests to the close cooperation representing the Trinchero Photo by Justin Jacobs of each person at FPS across family, donor Francis Mahoney, every function. Funding for this and the family of Pete Christensen, late Viticulture Foundation Vineyard was provided by the National Clean Specialist in the Department of Viticulture and Enology. Plant Network, a major new USDA program that benefits Having this event timed between the National Clean Plant clean plant centers for specialty crops at public institutions. Network Tier II Grapes annual meeting and Rose Day This is the final year of NCPN funding from the current allowed many distant guests to attend, including State farm bill. We hope that this program will continue to back and Federal regulatory officials, scientists from around us up as we fulfill our role as the foundation of registered the country, and many of our client nurseries. Photos of grapevine plants for growers and nurseries.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting South Australia from the Phylloxera Threat
    The Phylloxera Fight Protecting South Australia from the phylloxera threat Wally Boehm Winetitles Adelaide 1996 in association with The Phylloxera and Grape Industry Board of South Australia First published in 1996 by Winetitles PO Box 1140 Marleston SA 5033 A USTR A LI A in association with The Phylloxera and Grape Industry Board of South Australia 25 Grenfell Street, Adelaide South Australia 5000 © Copyright 1996 Wally Boehm and The Phylloxera and Grape Industry Board of South Australia All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be copied or reproduced by any means without the written permission of the publisher. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication Boehm, E.W. (Ernest Walter). The phylloxera fight: protecting South Australia from the phylloxera threat. Includes index. ISBN 1 875130 21 7 1. Phylloxera – South Australia. 2. Grapes – Diseases and pests – South Australia. 3. Grapes – Diseases and pests – Control – South Australia. I. South Australia. Phylloxera and Grape Industry Board. II. Title 634.82752099423 Design and typesetting Michael Deves Printed and bound by Hyde Park Press CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 The Dread of Phylloxera 1 CHAPTER 2 Phylloxera in Australia 13 CHAPTER 3 Phylloxera Legislation 34 CHAPTER 4 Rootstocks and Virus 45 CHAPTER 5 Nurseries and New Varieties 53 CHAPTER 6 Biotypes 58 CHAPTER 7 Vine Introduction Procedure 62 APPENDIX 1 The Phylloxera and Grape Industry Act 1994 71 APPENDIX 2 Vine Variety Introductions to South Australia 75 INDEX 90 Record of Board Membership Chairmen District 2 O.B. SEPPELT 1926–1933 O.B. Seppelt 1926–1933 Keith Leon RAINSFORD 1933–1944 Friedrich William Gursansky 1933–1955 Frederick Walter KAY 1944–1947 O.S.
    [Show full text]
  • WINE Talk: December 2014
    Licence No 58292 30 Salamanca Square, Hobart GPO Box 2160, Hobart Tasmania, 7001 Australia Telephone +61 3 6224 1236 [email protected] www.livingwines.com.au WINE Talk: December 2014 The newsletter of Living Wines: Edition 51 Welcome to the December 2014 newsletter. We have put out this shorter newsletter a bit earlier than usual to allow you to order special packs for Christmas. You will need to get your orders in straight away, however, because delivery firms get very busy around this time and deliveries always take longer. For this month only we have a special Christmas pack of one dozen specially selected wines to get you through the holiday season for which there is a 20% discount. We also have a 6 pack of sparkling wines, something it’s always important to have in the fridge over the holidays.. There is also a pack of what we have called On the Fringe wines. These have all been unfiltered and unfined and with no additions expect for one or two that have had tiny amounts of sulphur added. These are wines that are distinctly different. We are also delighted to offer a pack of wines that all come in under 12% alcohol this month as well as another pack of wines made from obscure grape varieties. We are finding more and more customers are asking for something different. And the final pack has only two bottles in it, but they are the two top cuvées from Loire Valley icon Jean-Pierre Robinot. We haven’t been able to offer these wines to our retail customers before as they are always snapped up by the trade, but we have managed to hold a few back this shipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Talking About Wine 11
    11 Talking about wine 1 Put the conversation in the correct order. a 1 waiter: Would you like to order some wine with your meal? b woman: Yes, a glass of Pinot Grigio, please. c waiter: The Chardonnay is sweeter than the Sauvignon Blanc. d man: We’d like two glasses of red to go with our main course. Which is smoother, the Chianti or the Bordeaux? e waiter: Well, they are both excellent wines. I recommend the Bordeaux. It’s more full-bodied than the Chianti and it isn’t as expensive. f man: Yes, please. Which is sweeter, the Chardonnay or the Sauvignon Blanc? g man: Right. I’ll have a glass of Chardonnay, then. Sarah, you prefer something drier, don’t you? h man: OK then, let’s have the Bordeaux. i waiter: Certainly, madam. And what would you like with your main course? j woman: Yes, a bottle of sparkling water, please. k waiter: Thank you, sir. Would you like some mineral water? l 12 waiter: OK, so that’s a glass of Chardonnay, a glass of Pinot Grigio, two glasses of Bordeaux and a bottle of sparkling mineral water. 2 Find the mistakes in each sentence and correct them. 1 The Chilean Merlot is not more as expensive as the French. 2 The Riesling is sweet than the Chardonnay. 3 The Pinot Grigio is drier as the Sauvignon Blanc. 4 Chilean wine is most popular than Spanish. 5 A Chianti is no as full-bodied as a good Bordeaux. 6 Champagne is more famous the sherry.
    [Show full text]
  • European Commission
    29.9.2020 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Union C 321/47 OTHER ACTS EUROPEAN COMMISSION Publication of a communication of approval of a standard amendment to the product specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 17(2) and (3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 (2020/C 321/09) This notice is published in accordance with Article 17(5) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 (1). COMMUNICATION OF A STANDARD AMENDMENT TO THE SINGLE DOCUMENT ‘VAUCLUSE’ PGI-FR-A1209-AM01 Submitted on: 2.7.2020 DESCRIPTION OF AND REASONS FOR THE APPROVED AMENDMENT 1. Description of the wine(s) Additional information on the colour of wines has been inserted in point 3.3 ‘Evaluation of the products' organoleptic characteristics’ in order to add detail to the description of the various products. The details in question have also been added to the Single Document under the heading ‘Description of the wine(s)’. 2. Geographical area Point 4.1 of Chapter I of the specification has been updated with a formal amendment to the description of the geographical area. It now specifies the year of the Geographic Code (the national reference stating municipalities per department) in listing the municipalities included in each additional geographical designation. The relevant Geographic Code is the one published in 2019. The names of some municipalities have been corrected but there has been no change to the composition of the geographical area. This amendment does not affect the Single Document. 3. Vine varieties In Chapter I(5) of the specification, the following 16 varieties have been added to those listed for the production of wines eligible for the ‘Vaucluse’ PGI: ‘Artaban N, Assyrtiko B, Cabernet Blanc B, Cabernet Cortis N, Floreal B, Monarch N, Muscaris B, Nebbiolo N, Pinotage N, Prior N, Soreli B, Souvignier Gris G, Verdejo B, Vidoc N, Voltis B and Xinomavro N.’ (1) OJ L 9, 11.1.2019, p.
    [Show full text]