DOCSLIB.ORG

Eurasia Antiqua 16/2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eurasia Antiqua 16/2010 View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Archivio Ricerca Ca'Foscari The Mesolithic of the northwestern Pontic region New AMS dates for the origin and spread of the blade and trapeze industries in southeastern Europe By Paolo Biagi and Dmytro Kiosak Schlagwo¨rter: Ukraine/Nordschwarzmeerraum/Krim/Mesolithikum/Chronologie/AMS-Daten Keywords: Ukraine/North Pontic Region/Crimea/Mesolithic/Chronology/AMS-dates ˚ºþ÷åâßå æºîâà: ÓŒðàŁíà/Ñåâåðíîå ˇðŁ÷åðíîìîðüe/˚ðßì/ÌåçîºŁò/ÕðîíîºîªŁ'/ÀÌÑ-äàííßå Introduction because many Kiev laboratory dates (Ki) have large standard deviations or are sometimes of problematic The scope of this paper is to discuss the radiocar- interpretation.5 This is why an updated radiocarbon bon chronology of the last hunter-gatherers of the curve is necessary to redefine the chronology of the northwestern Black Sea coast of the Ukraine and to different cultural aspects,6 in order to achieve abet- contribute to the assessment of the absolute chron- ter understanding of the behaviour of the last hun- ology of the Mesolithic period in the region. From a ter-gatherers who inhabited acomplex landscape af- geographical point of view, this territory, which has fected by many environmental changes during the acomplex geological background,1 can be subdi- Pleistocene-Holocene transition (ca 12000–7000 un- vided into the wide, continental steppe lowlands, cal BP).7 This will help us fill agap in our knowledge and the Crimean peninsula. The latter consists of of the chronological framework, which is still under three well-defined zones: a) the northern arid construction for the Near East, Anatolia, the Balkan steppe, b) the mountainous uplands, and c) the Peninsula, Eastern and Central Europe.8 warmer, humid seashore belt. The entire region is delimited by the Danube and Prut Rivers, in the west, the Black Sea, in the south, the Molochna Landscape and habitat River and the Azov Sea coastline, in the east, and the Podillian upland and the Ukrainian crystalline The palaeovegetation of the region has been stu- shield, in the north. It covers the area of four pro- died by A. T. Artiushenko, C. V. Kremenetski, G. vinces (Odessa, Mykolaiyv, Kherson, Zaporizh’e), Pashkevich, M. Zerov and others.9 These authors and the Crimean Autonomous Republic. It repre- discussed the location of the steppe boundary sents the westernmost corner of the Great Eurasian around the end of the Pleistocene and the Holo- Steppes, which borders the Carpathian-Danube ba- cene. The present-day limit is supposed to cross sin.2 Contacts and interrelationships between the Kishinev, Pervomaisk, Kyrovohrad, Kremenchug and Balkans and the steppes have been active for mil- Poltava, while the southern one is represented by lennia. They were particularly intense during the the Crimean foothills.10 The evolution of this bound- Late Palaeolithic Aurignacian culture, the Palaeo- ary has been reconstructed in three ways: a) accord- lithic/Mesolithic transition, the Neolithisation pro- ing to most palaeogeographers the steppe zone cess, and the Copper Age.3 was more widespread at the end of the last Glacia- The archaeology of the Late Pleistocene and tion. During the Preboreal and Boreal periods it Early Holocene of southwestern Ukraine is known covered aterritory similar to that of the present, from afew excavated sites and alarge number of while the woodland cover spread southwards dur- surface collections. One of the most intriguing pro- ing the Atlantic, delimiting the steppe landscape blems of the prehistory of these periods, which, in the Ukraine, are represented by many cultural as- 5 Anthony 1994. pects with different types of geometric, microlithic 6 Telegin et al. 2002. chipped stone tools,4 is radiocarbon chronology, 7 Korobkova 1993;Cordova 2007;Cordova/Lehmann 2005;Der- gacev/Dolukhanov 2007;Dergacev/Dolukhanov 2008;Stanko 2007;Yanko-Hombach 2007;Berger/Guilaine 2009;Dolukhanov 1 Dolukhanov 1979, 81–83. et al. 2009;Giosan et al. 2009. 2 Dolukhanovetal. 2009,Fig. 5. 8 Thissen 2000;Biagi et al. 2005;Dolukhanov et al. 2005;Pinha- 3 Childe 1925;Childe 1950;Tringham 1968;Tringham 1971;Koz- si et al. 2005;Bocquet-Appel et al. 2009 ;Berger/Guilane 2008; l/ owski/Kozl/ owski 1986;Sherratt 1997; ¸àðŁíà 1999;Koz /lowski http://www.canew.org/data.html 2002;Kotova 2003;Telegin et al. 2003;Marks/Monigal 2004; 9 ÀðòþłåíŒî 1970; ˇàłŒåâŁ÷ 1976; ˇàłŒåâŁ÷ 1982;Kreme- Meignen et al. 2004;Skakun 2005–2008;Otte 2006. netski 1997. 4 ˝óæíŁØ 1992. 10 ÌàðŁíŁ÷ 1982. 22 Paolo Biagi and Dmytro Kiosak ted in this paper: hlb1-1 and hlb1-2 (ca. 7800– 6900 uncal BP). The first (ca. 7800–7400 uncal BP) should correspond to the ‘‘climatic opti- mum’’, during which the forest cover reached its maximum development and spread, while the second (ca. 7400–6900 uncal BP) is marked by aclimatic worsening and aridification. In the steppes, the Atlantic sedimentation resulted in the development of grey(ish) soils heavily humu- fied around 6000–5100 uncal BP.16 The cultural sequence Crimea The current sequence of the Crimean Mesolithic was defined by G. A. Bonch-Osmolovsky17 who ex- cavated the type-sites of Shan-Koba, Fat’ma-Koba and Kukrek (Fig. 1,1–3).Influenced by the ‘‘stage paradigm’’, he attributed the finds from the above Fig. 1. to the Black Sea coastline and the Crimean plain,11 sites to the Azilian (Shan-Koba culture) and the Tar- Distribution map of the b) other environmentalists suggest that, during the denoisian (Murzak-Koba and Kukrek cultures). Later Mesolithic sites mentio- ned in the text. 1 Shan- Early and Middle Holocene, the steppes spread he described the main characteristics of the Kukrek Koba; 2 Fat’ma-Koba; some 150–175 km to the north;12 while, c) follow- chipped stone industry, which he called Tarde- 3 Kukrek; 4 Murzak- ing athird group, the steppe boundary was already noisian. In 1950 Voevodsky introduced the terms Koba; 5 Buran-Kaya; 13 18 6 Zamil-Koba; stabilized during the Holocene. Shan-Koba and Murzak-Koba cultures, partly sup- 7 Alymivs’ky; 8 Siuren’ Recently N. Gerasimenko14 proposed are- ported by Formozov.19 Vekilova, Kolosov and Dani- 2; 9 Vodopadny; vised scheme for the Holocene climatic variations in lenko,20 described the Kukrek culture in the 1960’s, 10 Skeliasty; 11 Kara- Koba; 12 Adzhi-Koba III; southern Ukraine. According to this author while, in 1976,Telegin defined the Gornokryms’ka 13 Laspi 7; 14 Vys- 1)the Preboreal (10300–9000 uncal BP) early warm- culture, which, according to him, resulted from both henne I; 15 Dobryanka; ing contributed to the development of the forest- Shan-Koba and Murzak-Koba (Fig. 1,4) complexes, 16 Ivanivka; 17 Bilo- lisja; 18 Tsarynka; steppe cover (pine forests with oak and elm, and which had already been described by Voevodsky. 19 Grebenyky; ‘‘mixed grass-cereal’’ steppes) in the present-day He also pointed out the local evolution of the ma- 20 Kamenna Mohyla; northern steppe region, and ‘‘turf-cereal’’ steppes terial culture, and the absence of any population 21 Igren’ 8; 22 Abu- 21 zova Balka; 23 Myrne; in the south. Anoticeable cool event charac- change in the mountains of the Crimea. Cohen 24 Zaliznychne; terised the end of this period (ca. 9600–9000 un- proposed amore detailed subdivision of the Crim- 25 Sarateni; 26 Soroki II; cal BP). The broadleaf woodland disappeared, ean Final Palaeolithic and Mesolithic into four cul- 27 Gyrzheve; 28 Vasily- 22 evka II; 29 Marjevka. xerophytic cenosises spread, afew rivers dried tures and five different complexes. up, and loess deposits started to accumulate; The state of the research was summarised by 2)the Boreal (9000–8000 uncal BP) can be subdi- Janevich, Nuzhny and Zaliznyak.23 At present most vided into two sub-periods. During the first (BO-1) authors accept the subdivision of the Crimean Me- the northern steppes were covered with wood- solithic into two main periods, early and late: the lands thicker than those of the Preboreal. Oak, first is represented by sites of the Shan-Koba cul- elm and lime were present, although birch was ture, the second by Murzak-Koba ones, while the much more common. The second sub-period Kukrek culture evolved in the steppes of the Crimea (BO-2)was dryer, with adecrease in the forest during the Early Holocene. cover, the decline of broadleaf tree species, and the wide spread of ‘‘mixed grass-cereal’’ steppes; 3)M.F.Veklich15 divided the Atlantic into six main 16 ˆåðàæŁìåíŒî 2004. sub-periods, only the first two of which are trea- 17 `îí÷-˛æìîºîâæŒŁØ 1934. 18 ´îåâîäæŒŁØ 1950. 19 Ôîðìîçîâ 1954. 11 ÀðòþłåíŒî 1970; ÑìŁíòŁíà 2001. 20 ´åŒŁºîâà 1951; ´åŒŁºîâà 1966; ˚îºîæîâ 1964; ˜àíŁºåíŒî 12 ÑåðåÆð'ííà' 1976. 1969. 13 ˝åØłòàäò 1957. 21 Òåºåªií 1982. 14 ˆåðàæŁìåíŒî 2004. 22 Cohen 1999. 15 ´åŒºŁ÷ 1987. 23 ßíåâŁ÷ 1987; ˝óæíŁØ 1992; ˙ງçí'Œ 1998; ˙ງçí'Œ 2005. The Mesolithic of the northwestern Pontic region 23 The Shan-Koba culture chipped stone assem- blages (Buran-Kaya, layer 5,24 Fat’ma-Koba, layers 5 and 6;Shan-Koba, layers 4–6;Zamil-Koba, lower layers; Alymivs’ky rock-shelter, Siuren’ 2,upper layers; Vodopadny and Skalistiy rock-shelters (Fig. 1,5–10) and afew other sites, consist of prismatic, sub-prismatic, double and multi-platformed cores. With afew exceptions, the end-scrapers are more nu- merous than the burins. The characteristic tools in- clude elongated end-scrapers on blades and shor- tened blades, short end-scrapers on flakes, and thumbnail end-scrapers, as well as different types of burins, although those on truncation prevail. The mi- croliths consist of direct retouch and bipolar lunates and double truncated points. Trapezes and triangles are less common, although they were obtained by the same technique as the lunates.25 This culture is thought to have originated around the end of the Pleistocene.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mesolithic Bone Tools of South-West Europe : the Example of the French Site of Le Cuzoul De Gramat Benjamin Marquebielle
    Mesolithic bone tools of South-West Europe : the example of the French site of le Cuzoul de Gramat Benjamin Marquebielle To cite this version: Benjamin Marquebielle. Mesolithic bone tools of South-West Europe : the example of the French site of le Cuzoul de Gramat. 7th Meeting of the Worked Bone Research Group, Sep 2009, Wroclaw, Poland. hal-01990262 HAL Id: hal-01990262 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01990262 Submitted on 11 Feb 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Written in Bones Studies on technological and social contexts of past faunal skeletal remains edited by Justyna Baron Bernadeta Kufel-Diakowska Uniwersytet Wrocławski Instytut Archeologii Wrocław 2011 InstItute of ArchAeology, unIversIty of Wrocław, 2011 Editors Justyna Baron and Bernadeta Kufel-Diakowska Reviewers Arkadiusz Marciniak, Jarosław Wilczyński Layout Janusz M. szafran, Jarosław Michalak Cover Justyna Baron © Institute of Archaeology, university of Wrocław and individual authors 2011 IsBn 978-83-61416-64-7 Wrocławska Drukarnia naukowa PAN im. stanisława Kulczyńskiego sp. z o.o. 53-505 Wrocław, ul. lelewela 4 Contents Preface . 5 Methods and methodology steven P. Ashby The Language of the Combmaker: interpreting complexity in Viking-Age Industry .
    [Show full text]
  • Rigorous During This Tine. Perhaps It Would. Be Worthwhile, Then, to Ox
    THIE PROBLEM OF RACE IN THE MESOLITHIC OF EUROPE1 Robert J. Squier Tho problem of the origins and racial affinities of the mosolithic peoples of Europe has received attention from a good many writers in the past. Much of the material on this subject is conflicting and tho argu- ments are scattered throughout a large nuarbor of sources. It may at least be suspected that some of the arguments have been influenced by the geographical locations and cultural associations in which the human remains have been found. The notion of race itself has undergone some revision in the period during which these remains have been accumulated (Vallois, 1953). Ideas on tho usefulness of small or poorly preserved skeletal samples for racial identification have become sorowhat more rigorous during this tine. Perhaps it would. be worthwhile, then, to ox- anine some of the statements on race in the Mesolithic against the back- ground of tho bones of contention-the skeletal ronains-thonselvos. Factors of importance to studies of prehistoric race, such as tho degroe of isolation or of contact with other peoples, must be viewed in the perspective of the cultural situation pertaining in the particular case or cases, and this in turn is influenced as regards such factors by the environmental conditions of the time. Accordingly, I have thought. it useful to include as a preliminary a brief review of the major environ- mental and cultural developments of the European Mosolithic. NATURAL AND CULTURAL XNflONMEN2 Natural Environment. The boundary between the Upper Palacolithic and Mesolithic in Europe is by common agreement drawn to coincide with the transition from the Late Glacial to the Post Glacial (Recent) period.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prehistory of Polish Pomerania
    THE BALTIC POCKET LIBRARY THE PREHISTORY OF POLISH POMERANIA BY DR. JÓZEF KOSTRZEWSKI PROFESSOR OF PREHISTORY*^!' THE UNIVERSITY OF POZNAŃ 1 9 TORUŃ (POLAND)3_6 PUBLISHED BY THE BALTIC INSTITUTE J. S. BERGSON, 4, VERNON PLACE, LONDON W. C. 1 THE PREHISTORY OF POLISH POMERANIA r Double face urn and bronze cauldron of provincial workmanship, found at Topolno, district of Świecie. I 4 Ki THE BALTIC POCKET LIBRARY THE PREHISTORY OF POLISH POMERANIA BY DR. JÓZEF KOSTRZEWSKI PROFESSOR OF PREHISTORY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF POZNAŃ 19 TORUŃ (POLAND) 3 6 PUBLISHED BY THE BALTIC INSTITUTE J. S. BERGSON, 4, VERNON PLACE, LONDON W. C, 1 Printed in Poland by “Rolnicza Drukarnia i Księgarnia Nakładowa Poznań, Sew. Mielżyńskiego 24 CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................5 CHAPTER 1. THE STONE AGE......................................................... 9 The Final Palaeolithic Period, p. 9. The Mesolithic Age, p. 10. The Neolithic Age, p. 13; Ribbon Ware, p. 14; Funnel Cup Culture, p. 16; Eastern Globular Amphora Culture, p. 19; The Corded Pottery Culture, p. 21; The Rzucewo Culture, p. 24; The Comb Pottery, p. 29; Finds of Copper, p. 30. CHAPTER 2. THE BRONZE AGE....................................................32 The Early Bronze Age, p. 32; The Iwno Culture, p. 33; Hoards, p. 34. The Second Bronze Age Period, p. 36. The Third Bronze Age Period, p. 37; The Cassubian Local Group, p. 38; The Chełmno Local Group, p. 40; Affinities of the Lusatian Culture, p. 41. The Fourth Bronze Age Period, p. 43; The Cassubian Sub-Group, p. 43,; The Chełmno Sub-Groun, p. 46. The Fifth (Latest) Bronze Age Period, p. 49; The Cassubian Sub-Group, p.
    [Show full text]
  • *F,,Ttv' \ Oz - Apnrropolo4'f
    4oz*: ' arfta:4' "" Ph. D. SYLLABUS ! (F OR ENTRANCE EXAMINATION) FORPh. D. PROGRAMME IN ANTHROPOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY DOCTOR HARISINGH GOUR VISHWAVIDYALA SAGAR, M.P. 2018-2020 G<,r.-- r,-.riti.E f:r,?rl.\--fi *F,,ttv' \ oZ - APnrRoPoLo4'f SECTION- A (RESEARCH METHODOLOGY) EmPiricism Scientific Research : Characteristics, types and methods : Approach' (P'& ositivism) v/s Phiiosophical : Importince, PurPose Social Research : Nature of Social Research Meaning, and Scope. ' of Fietd Work : Tradition in Anthropology : Covering all branches Anthropology to gain holistic perspectives' schedules and 4. Techniques of Data collection: observation, Interview, Case study, Genealogy' Questionnaires, Focus Group Discussion, Types of Social Research : Fundamental or Pure Research, Applied Research, Action Research, Evaluation Research, Exploratory Research' in social 6. Social Research and Social Survey : Research Design. Major Steps resealch and HYPothesis. 1 Bio-statisties : Importance of statistics in Anthropology. Measures of central tendencies: Arithmetic Mean, Median, Mode, Measures of DiSpersion: Standard Deviation;-Coefficient of variation. 'T' test and 'Chi-squire' test' V ffitr t loz-. and Lower Jaw; Blood Groups; Dermatoglyphics. Distribution and Characteristics - Caucasoid; Negroid; Mongoloid' Racial Classifications - Deniker's; Hooton's; Coon, Garn and Birdsel Ts. Racial Classifica?ion of Indian Populations - Risley's; Guha's; Sarkar's' Chroriology : Relative, Absolute and Cultural. Geological framework :Tertiary, during pleistocene. Quatemary-Pleistocene, Holocene. Major Climatic changes Glacial and lnterglacial periods. Causes of lce Ages. Pluvial and lnterpluvial periods. Moraines, River Terraces, Loess, sealevel changes-caves, Marine, terraces, Beach, ridges. Relative dating : Terrace, Stratigraphy, Palaenology, Palaeoutology. Absolute dating : Radio-carbon, Potassium-argon, Thermol uminescence, Dendrochronology. Cultural Chronology-Three-age system : Stone Age, Copper / Bronze A-ge, Iron Age.
    [Show full text]
  • Sauveterrian Hunter-Gatherers in Northern Italy and Southern France : Evolution and Dynamics of Lithic Technical Systems Davide Visentin
    Sauveterrian hunter-gatherers in Northern Italy and Southern France : evolution and dynamics of lithic technical systems Davide Visentin To cite this version: Davide Visentin. Sauveterrian hunter-gatherers in Northern Italy and Southern France : evolution and dynamics of lithic technical systems. Archaeology and Prehistory. Université Toulouse le Mirail - Toulouse II; Università degli studi (Ferrare, Italie), 2017. English. NNT : 2017TOU20024. tel- 02063939 HAL Id: tel-02063939 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02063939 Submitted on 11 Mar 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Universita` degli Studi di Ferrara Dottorato di ricerca in Scienze Umane Curriculum Quaternario e Preistoria Ciclo XXIX - Coord. Prof. C. Peretto - S.S.D. L-Ant/01 Universite´ Toulouse -Jean Jaures` Doctorat de l’Université de Toulouse Specialité Préhistoire École doctorale TESC Doctoral Thesis Accademic years 2014/2016 Sauveterrian hunter-gatherers in Northern Italy and Southern France Evolution and dynamics of lithic technical systems Author: Supervisors: Davide Visentin Federica Fontana Marco Peresani Nicolas Valdeyron Tutor: Sylvie Philibert Jury Fabio Negrino - Ricercatore, Univesità degli Studi di Genova (Italy) Marco Peresani - Professore associato, Univesità degli Studi di Ferrara (Italy) Bénédicte Souffi - Responsable d’opération, INRAP (France) Nicolas Valdeyron - Professeur, Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (France) Annelou van Gijn - Professor, Leiden University (Netherlands) Reviewers M.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article in PDF Format
    151 Section V : Exotic, Prestige and Luxury trade THE STATUS OF ELK DURING THE MESOLITHIC Anne BRIDAULT * Summary Résumé The distribution of elk remains during the Mesolithic Le statut de !'Elan durant le Mésolithique. suggests a genuine geographical disparity in elk population La distribution des restes d'élan pendant le Mésolithique densities probably due to more or less favourable ecological suggère une forte disparité géographique, probablement conditions. ln northem and north-eastem Europe the high redevable de conditions écologiques plus ou moins favo­ proportion of elk bones in faunal assemblages suggests that rables. Tandis que dans l'Europe du Nord et du Nord-Est, elk was an economic ressource from Allerod until Atlantic l'élan est une ressource économique importante depuis times. Elk remains are almost absent from the l'Allerod jusqu'à l'Atlantique, il est quasi absent des sites archaeological record of western Europe. Furthermore at archéologiques d'Europe de l'Ouest durant cette même those sites where elk is a scarce species, only certain période. Là où l'élan est rare, seuls certains des os de son squeletal parts, such as teeth and foot bones, tend to be squelette comme les phalanges ou les dents sont générale­ found. Severa/ kinds of explanation are presented, some ment retrouvés. Plusieurs types d'explication peuvent être involving the mode of acquisition of the remains (hunting or proposés, notamment sur le mode d'acquisition (animal exchange of elk products) and the possible symbolic status chassé ou produits échangés) et sur l'éventuel statut symbo­ of elk. There is strong evidence for the elk symbolic status lique de cet animal.
    [Show full text]
  • 282048 Vol 1.Pdf
    I THESIS FOR THE Ph.D. DEGREE SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF LODON FACULTY OF ARTS BY GEOFFREY JOHN WAINWRIGHT INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY APRIL 1961 THE MESOLITHIC PERIOD IN SOUTH AND WESTERN BRITAIN VOLUME 1 ii ABSTRACT A detailed study has been made of the Mesolithic material in southern and Western Britain and a quantity of new evidence has been recorded from west England and Wales, by means of research in the field and. in museums and private collections. The results of the study may be summarised under headings re- ferring to the four main cultural groups with which it is concerned. TEE MAGLETOSEAN CULTURE New evidence has extended the previously known distributton of the Maglemosean culture into Somerset andCornwall and a concentration of settlement around the Solent has been established. THE HORSHAM CULTURE Previously published evidence has been reorganised. in order to establish the distribution, economy and origins of this culture in the Weald, and new evidence has indicated a slight penetration of this culture into western Britain. THE BRITISH 'SAUVETERRIAN' This culture has been re-examined in the light of new evidence from west England, and. it is suggested that the industrs which ex- hibit the clearest affinities with the continental Sauveterrian occur in west England and Wales, in the areas of Upper Palaeolithic Settle- ment. An indigenous origin for these industries is considered possible and no similar sites have been identified in southern and iii eastern England. SITES WITH COASTAL ECONOMIES A quantity of new evidence has been recorded in west England and. Wales, for the identification of cultural groups which pursued an economy based on the sea shore, wihh a diminished reliance on the hunting of small game.
    [Show full text]
  • The Azilian Problem in the Franco-Cantabrian Region
    CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHY OF THE PLEISTOCENE/HOLOCENE BOUNDARY: THE AZILIAN PROBLEM IN THE FRANCO-CANTABRIAN REGION Lawrence Guy Straus* ABSTRACT: The chrono-stratigraphic evidence for the Azilian of Vasco-Cantabrian Spain and France is reviewed and found to range from the Allerød to the Preboreal. A survey of the associated artifact and fauna assemblages indicates the transitional nature ofthe Azilian between the Magdalenian and the Mesolithic. The relationship between Azilian technology and supposedly abrupt adaptations to radically changed en­ vironmental conditions at the 10,000 B.P. boundary is not straightforward. KEYWORDS: Azilian, Franco-Cantabria, Magdalenian, Upper Palaeolithic, Mesolithic, Pleistocene/Ho­ locene boundary, chrono-stratigraphy, radiocarbon, pollen, sedimentology. 1. INTRODUCTION Holocene transition in the Franco-Cantabrian re­ gion (fig. 1). This article attempts to clarify the question of the As a result of his excavations in the cave of El precise age of a culture-stratigraphic unit long Pendo and other sites in the Province of San tander recognized as transitional between the classic Up­ ('Cantabria'), J. Carballo (1922; 1960) argued that per Palaeolithic and Mesolithic: the Azilian. It is the Cantabrian Azilian was locally derived from the clear that normative characterization of prehistoric Upper Magdalenian and, consequently, that it was 'cultures' to 'date' archaeological deposits to pa­ an early manifestation of this 'culture'. Carballo leoclimatic ph ases is a procedure based on circular thus placed the 'origins' of the Azilian in Canta­ reasoning. It is also obvious that it cannot be brian Spain, a tendency followed to this day by assumed a priori that all Azilian-type assemblages certain other regional prehistorians, notably his or fossil directors must date to the same (brief) disciple, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesolithic Culture of Europe (Azilian, Tardenoisian, Maglemosian, Kitchen Midden)
    Mesolithic Culture of Europe (Azilian, Tardenoisian, Maglemosian, Kitchen Midden) Introduction The Mesolithic period falls between Palaeolithic and Neolithic in time. In Lubbock’s original division of the Stone Age into two periods; the Palaeolithic and the Neolithic, were thought to have been separated by a hiatus. Subsequent excavations at Mas d’Azil in France and other sitesm documented the existence of Early Holocene hunting and gathering cultures in mid-latitude regions. By the last quarter of the nineteenth century, several authors like A. Brown had suggested independently the use of the term Mesolithic for these industries, although the first synthetic studies of European Mesolithic industries, compiled by J.G.D. Clark, were not published until the 1950s. The Mesolithic is the period of the last hunter-gatherers of Europe beginning on the onset of the Holocene, around 10,300 BP. The end of the Mesolithic is characterized by the appearance of agricultural economies, usually along with other changes such as permanent villages and ceramic vessels. Because this economic transition occurred at different times throughout the continent, the dates for the end of the Mesolithic differ across Europe. In general, hunting and gathering persisted longer as the dominant economy in the 1 north, and hence the Mesolithic lasts considerably longer in the northern parts of the continent. Epipalaeolithic Epipalaeolithic is a loosely defined chronological or cultural classification applied to the last phase of the Palaeolithic period. In the past, researchers of European prehistory have sometimes used the term to describe the period between the Palaeolithic and the Mesolithic. During this interval the material culture complexes in Europe, such as the Azilian, exhibit certain aspects of Magdalenian technology and subsistence and make use of many of the same sites but lack key cultural indicators of the Upper Palaeolithic such as developed art and lack microlithic technology, and so have fallen outside the traditional classification of the Mesolithic.
    [Show full text]
  • Slah Rectangular Bladelets Discovered at the Katra I Settlement
    RECTANGULAR BLADELETS DISCOVERED AT THE KATRA I SETTLEMENT IN THE VARĖNA DISTRICT OF LITHUANIA: A FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS GVIDAS SLAH Rectangular Bladelets Discovered Rectangular Bladelets Discovered at the Katra I Settlement in District of Lithuania: Varėna a Functional Analysis Abstract GVIDAS GVIDAS SLAH This paper deals with the function of rectangular bladelets produced in experimental studies. The function of the bladelets produced experimentally was compared with that of a similar flint inventory discovered at the Katra I settlement. The ex- perimental studies were carried out in the traceological laboratory at Klaipėda University. The functional dependence of the laboratory-produced flint blades and artefacts found at the Katra I settlement (in the Varėna district) were established with an Olympus SZX16 microscope. The experimental items were used in contact with dry reeds (Phragmites). It was established that the functions of the laboratory-produced blades and the ones discovered at the Katra I settlement coincided: most of the artefacts from the Mesolithic and Neolithic periods from the Katra I settlement were used for reed cutting. Key words: experimental archaeology, microlithic technology, microblades, sickle insert, functional analysis, use-wear traces DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15181/ab.v20i0.814. Introduction types of geometric artefacts, and small, frequently sin- gle-ended cores. According to him, the culture reached The first Mesolithic finds in Lithuania appeared in the lakes Svyriai and Narutis (Svir and Naroch in Belaru- collections of amateur archaeologists in the late 19th sian), and possibly the River Daugava. As the Tarde- century. In their papers, the researchers Zygmunt Glo- noisian campsites were located mainly on lake shores, ger and Vandalin Szukiewicz discussed artefacts col- Antoniewicz related them to fishermen’s and hunters’ lected by them, including microliths.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 1 Mesolithic Features
    Mesolithic Features UNIT 1 MESOLITHIC FEATURES Contents 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Environment of Europe During Early Holocene Period 1.3 Tool Types and Manufacturing Techniques 1.4 Mesolithic Cultures of Europe 1.4.1 Maglemosian Culture 1.4.2 Tardenoisian Culture 1.5 Post -Pleistocene/Post-glacial/Early Holocene Ecology 1.6 Summary Suggested Reading Sample Questions Learning Objectives & Once you have studied this unit, you should be able to: Ø learn about the culture that flourished in Europe during Post Pleistocene period in Europe; Ø know about the environmental background of the Holocene period in Europe; Ø learn about the change in tool types and their manufacturing technique during this period; Ø learn about Mesolithic man and his culture; and Ø learn about Mesolithic ecology that is the mode of adjustment of the Mesolithic people in the changing environmental condition of early Holocene period in Europe. 1.1 INTRODUCTION Mesolithic is a cultural stage belonging to human beings who were completely modern in their biological characteristics and are known as Homosapiens sapiens. In fact, people lived almost in the same way as they did during Palaeolithic stage. The main difference being they that lived in Europe at a time when the climate was changing from what it was during the previous geological stage, known as the Pleistocene epoch. The geological epoch which follows is known as Holocene. Both Pleistocene and Holocene belong to the Quaternary period. Holocene is also known as the Recent or Neothermal phase. We are living in the Holocene phase. Holocene began around 10,000 years B.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Issue: Personal Ornaments in Early Prehistory Cultural
    Special Issue: Personal Ornaments in Early Prehistory Cultural Implications of Uniformity in Ornament Assemblages: Paleolithic and Mesolithic Ornaments From Franchthi Cave, Greece CATHERINE PERLÈS Université Paris Nanterre, CNRS UMR 7055, MAE, 21 allée de l’Université, 92023 Nanterre Cedex, FRANCE; [email protected] submitted: 27 November 2017; accepted 10 January 2018 ABSTRACT The Paleolithic and Mesolithic ornament assemblages from the Franchthi Cave are possibly the richest in Europe in the number of specimens. They are also, undoubtedly, the most restricted in terms of ornament types and the most uniform through time. Perforated Tritia neritea, Tritia pellucida, Antalis sp. and Columbella rustica constitute the dominant types throughout the sequence, from the earliest Upper Paleolithic to the end of the Mesolithic. Pre-Aurignacian, Aurignacian, and Gravettian assemblages, for instance, are completely similar in terms of types and frequency, and the same holds true for the Final Upper Paleolithic and the Lower Mesolithic. Such stability in the choice of ornament types, despite repeated changes in the status and function of the site, contradicts the dis- continuities exemplified by the lithic assemblages. This raises the question of the cultural proxies we use to define past cultural entities and suggests a revision of the paleogeography of prehistoric Europe. This special issue is guest-edited by Daniella E. Bar-Yosef Mayer (Steinhardt Museum of Natural History and Institute of Archaeology, Tel Aviv University) and Marjolein D. Bosch (McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge). This is article #11 of 12. INTRODUCTION pied as a hunting halt by small groups that focused on the he Franchthi Cave and its Neolithic open-air settlement, exploitation of game and the procurement of ornamental Tthe ‘Paralia,’ were excavated from 1976 to 1978 under shell species (Stiner and Munro 2011).
    [Show full text]