09/30/21 PHIL2030: Aesthetics | University College London
PHIL2030: Aesthetics View Online
1.
Dewey, J. Art as experience. (Minton Balch, 1934).
2.
George Dickie. The Myth of the Aesthetic Attitude. American Philosophical Quarterly 1, 56–65 (1964).
3.
Dickie, G. Beardsley’s Phantom Aesthetic Experience. The Journal of Philosophy 62, (1965).
4.
Beardsley, M. C. Aesthetic Experience Regained. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 28, (1969).
5.
Shusterman, R. The End of Aesthetic Experience. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55, (1997).
6.
Richard Shusterman. Aesthetic Experience: From Analysis to Eros. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64, 217–229 (2006).
1/14 09/30/21 PHIL2030: Aesthetics | University College London
7.
Nanay, B. Aesthetic Attention. Journal of Consciousness Studies 22, 96–118.
8.
‘Wonder Works: Renovating Romanticism About Art’ Jesse Prinz | AESTHETICS FOR BIRDS. https://aestheticsforbirds.com/2013/08/05/wonder-works-renovating-romanticism-about-art -jesse-prinz/.
9.
Hume, Of the Standard of Taste, Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary, Part I, Essay XXIII. | Library of Economics and Liberty. http://www.econlib.org/library/LFBooks/Hume/hmMPL23.html.
10.
Hume, OF THE DELICACY OF TASTE AND PASSION. Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary, Part I, Essay I. | Library of Economics and Liberty. http://www.econlib.org/library/LFBooks/Hume/hmMPL1.html.
11.
Jerrold Levinson. Hume’s Standard of Taste: The Real Problem. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60, 227–238 (2002).
12.
Levinson, J. Hume’s Standard of Taste: The Real Problem. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60, 227–238 (2002).
13.
Kieran, M. Why Ideal Critics are Not Ideal: Aesthetic Character, Motivation and Value. The British Journal of Aesthetics 48, 278–294 (2008).
2/14 09/30/21 PHIL2030: Aesthetics | University College London
14.
SHELLEY JAMES. Hume and the Joint Verdict of True Judges. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 71, 145–153 (2013).
15.
Wieand, J. Hume’s Two Standards of Taste. The Philosophical Quarterly 34, (1984).
16.
Dura-Vila, V. Courage in Art Appreciation: A Humean Perspective. The British Journal of Aesthetics 54, 77–95 (2014).
17.
JAMES SHELLEY. Hume and the Joint Verdict of True Judges. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 71, 145–153 (2013).
18.
Budd, M. Values of art: pictures, poetry and music. vol. Penguin philosophy (Penguin, 1996).
19.
Gracyk, Theodore. Hume’s Aesthetics.
20.
John McDowell. ‘Values and Secondary Qualities’, in Essays on Moral Realism.
21.
Kivy, P. HUME’S STANDARD OF TASTE: BREAKING THE CIRCLE. The British Journal of Aesthetics 7, 57–66 (1967).
3/14 09/30/21 PHIL2030: Aesthetics | University College London
22.
Carroll, N. Hume’s Standard of Taste. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 43, (1984).
23.
Shelley, J. Hume’s Double Standard of Taste. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 52, (1994).
24.
S. Wieand, J. Hume’s Real Problem. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 61, 395–398 (2003).
25.
Levinson, J. The Real Problem Sustained: Reply to Wieand. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 61, 398–399 (2003).
26.
Kant, I., Matthews, E. G. & Guyer, P. Critique of the power of judgment. vol. The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge University Press, 2000).
27.
Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy. (Cambridge University Press, 2006). doi:10.1017/CBO9780511498220.
28.
Wicks, R. Routledge philosophy guidebook to Kant on judgment. vol. Routledge philosophy guidebooks (Routledge, 2007).
29.
Guyer, Paul. 18th Century German Aesthetics.
4/14 09/30/21 PHIL2030: Aesthetics | University College London
30.
Zangwill, N. UNKANTIAN NOTIONS OF DISINTEREST. The British Journal of Aesthetics 32, 149–152 (1992).
31.
McDowell, J. Values as Secondary Qualities. in.
32.
Wiggins, D. Needs, values, truth: essays in the philosophy of value. (Clarendon Press, 2002).
33.
David Bell. The Art of Judgement. Mind 96, 221–244 (1987).
34.
Kant, I., Matthews, E. G. & Guyer, P. Critique of the power of judgment. vol. The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge University Press, 2000).
35.
Wenzel, C. H. & Wiley InterScience (Online service). An introduction to Kant’s aesthetics: core concepts and problems. (Blackwell Pub, 2005).
36.
Shier, David. Why Kant finds nothing ugly. British Journal of Aesthetics; London 38, 412–418.
37.
Wenzel, Christian. KANT FINDS NOTHING UGLY? British Journal of Aesthetics; London 39,.
5/14 09/30/21 PHIL2030: Aesthetics | University College London
38.
Allison, H. E. Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. vol. Modern European Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, 2001).
39.
Savile, A. Aesthetic reconstructions: the seminal writings of Lessing, Kant and Schiller. vol. Aristotelian Society series (Basil Blackwell, 1987).
40.
Carlson, A. Appreciation and the Natural Environment. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 37, (1979).
41.
Edited by Jerrold Levinson. Aesthetics of Nature. in The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics.
42.
Carlson, Allen. Environmental Aesthetics.
43.
Budd, M. The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature. (Oxford University Press, 2003). doi:10.1093/0199259658.001.0001.
44.
Carlson, A. Contemporary Environmental Aesthetics and the Requirements of Environmentalism. Environmental Values 19, 289–314 (2010).
45.
6/14 09/30/21 PHIL2030: Aesthetics | University College London
Berleant, A. Art and engagement. (Temple University Press, 1991).
46.
Hepburn, R. & Berleant, A. Living in the Landscape: Towards an Aesthetics of Environment. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 56, (1998).
47.
Matthews, P. Scientific Knowledge and the Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60, 37–48 (2002).
48.
ALLEN CARLSON, SHEILA LINTOTT, ARNOLD BERLEANT, SAMANTHA CLARK, YURIKO SAITO, YRJÖ SEPÄNMAA. Environmental Values special issue on Hepburn’s Aesthetics. (2307).
49.
Red Sky at Night: The Science of Sunsets. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/10/131027-sunset-sky-change-color-red-cl ouds-science/.
50.
Weitz, M. The Role of Theory in Aesthetics. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 15, (1956).
51.
Dickie, G. What is Art? An Institutional Analysis. in Art and the Aesthetics: An Institutional Analysis (Cornell University Press, 1974).
52.
Levinson, J. DEFINING ART HISTORICALLY. The British Journal of Aesthetics 19, 232–250 (1979).
7/14 09/30/21 PHIL2030: Aesthetics | University College London
53.
ABELL, C. Art: What it Is and Why it Matters. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85, 671–691 (2012).
54.
Davies, S. Definitions of art. (Cornell University Press, 1991).
55.
Mandelbaum, Maurice. Family Resemblances and Generalization concerning the Arts.
56.
Danto, A. The Artworld. The Journal of Philosophy 61, (1964).
57.
Warburton, N. The art question. (Routledge, 2002).
58.
Dutton, D. ARTISTIC CRIMES: THE PROBLEM OF FORGERY IN THE ARTS. The British Journal of Aesthetics 19, 302–314 (1979).
59.
Lessing, A. What Is Wrong with a Forgery? The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 23, (1965).
60.
Sharpe, R. A. The Empiricist Theory of Artistic Value. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 58, (2000).
8/14 09/30/21 PHIL2030: Aesthetics | University College London
61.
Shelley, J. The Problem of Non-Perceptual Art. The British Journal of Aesthetics 43, 363–378 (2003).
62.
Bowden, R. What Is Wrong with an Art Forgery?: An Anthropological Perspective. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 57, (1999).
63.
Walton, K. L. Categories of Art. The Philosophical Review 79, (1970).
64.
IRVIN, S. Forgery and the Corruption of Aesthetic Understanding. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37, 283–304 (2007).
65.
Goodman, N. Languages of art: an approach to a theory of symbols. (Hackett, 1976).
66.
In Praise of Art Forgeries - The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/03/opinion/sunday/in-praise-of-art-forgeries.html?_r=0.
67.
Denis Dutton on Forgery and Plagiarism. http://www.denisdutton.com/forgery_and_plagiarism.htm.
68.
9/14 09/30/21 PHIL2030: Aesthetics | University College London
Keats, J. Forged: why fakes are the great art of our age. (Oxford University Press, 2013).
69.
Lamarque, P. VIII-Work and Object. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) 102, 141–162 (2002).
70.
Thomasson, A. L. Debates about the Ontology of Art: What are We Doing Here? Philosophy Compass 1, 245–255 (2006).
71.
Livingston, Paisley. History of the Ontology of Art.
72.
SHARPE, R. A. Type, Token, Interpretation and Performance. Mind LXXXVIII, 437–440 (1979).
73.
THOMASSON, A. L. Ontological Innovation in Art. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68, 119–130 (2010).
74.
Dodd, J. Musical works as eternal types. The British Journal of Aesthetics 40, 424–440 (2000).
75.
Trivedi, S. Against Musical Works as Eternal Types. The British Journal of Aesthetics 42, 73–82 (2002).
10/14 09/30/21 PHIL2030: Aesthetics | University College London
76.
Dodd, J. Confessions of an Unrepentant Timbral Sonicist. The British Journal of Aesthetics 50, 33–52 (2010).
77.
Goehr, L. Being True to the Work. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 47, (1989).
78.
Aaron Ridley. Against Musical Ontology. The Journal of Philosophy 100, 203–220 (2003).
79.
Hamilton, J. The Text-Performance Relation in Theater. Philosophy Compass 4, 614–629 (2009).
80.
Saltz, D. Z. When is the Play the Thing?—Analytic Aesthetics and Dramatic Theory. Theatre Research International 20, 266–276 (1995).
81.
Saltz, D. Z. What Theatrical Performance Is (Not): The Interpretation Fallacy. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 59, 299–306 (2001).
82.
Graham McFee. Was That Swan Lake I Saw You at Last Night?: Dance-Identity and Understanding Original text. Dance Research: The Journal of the Society for Dance Research 12, 20–40 (1994).
83.
11/14 09/30/21 PHIL2030: Aesthetics | University College London
Bresnahan, Aili. The Philosophy of Dance.
84.
What Exactly is a Dance? | Research blog by Anna Pakes. http://roehamptondance.com/whatexactlyisadance/.
85.
Gregory Currie. Work and Text Original text. Mind 100, 325–340 (1991).
86.
Stolnitz, J. ON THE COGNITIVE TRIVIALITY OF ART. The British Journal of Aesthetics 32, 191–200 (1992).
87.
Gaut, B. Art and Knowledge. in The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics.
88.
Gibson, J. Cognitivism and the Arts. Philosophy Compass 3, 573–589 (2008).
89.
Carroll, N. The Wheel of Virtue: Art, Literature, and Moral Knowledge. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60, 3–26 (2002).
90.
Graham, G. LEARNING FROM ART. The British Journal of Aesthetics 35, 26–37 (1995).
91.
Robinson, J. L’Education Sentimentale. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73, 212–226
12/14 09/30/21 PHIL2030: Aesthetics | University College London
(1995).
92.
John, E. Reading Fiction and Conceptual Knowledge: Philosophical Thought in Literary Context. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 56, (1998).
93.
Green, M. How and What We Can Learn from Fiction. in A Companion to the Philosophy of Literature (eds. Hagberg, G. L. & Jost, W.) 350–366 (Wiley-Blackwell, 2009). doi:10.1002/9781444315592.ch18.
94.
Wilson, J. VII—Internal and External Validity in Thought Experiments. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 116, 127–152 (2016).
95.
Smuts, A. Art and Negative Affect. Philosophy Compass 4, 39–55 (2009).
96.
Morreall, J. Enjoying Negative Emotions in Fictions. Philosophy and Literature 9, 95–103 (1985).
97.
Smuts, A. The Paradox of Painful Art. The Journal of Aesthetic Education 41, 59–76 (2007).
98.
Walton, K. L. Mimesis as make-believe: on the foundations of the representational arts. (Harvard University Press, 1990).
13/14 09/30/21 PHIL2030: Aesthetics | University College London
99.
Hume, ‘Of Tragedy’. Essays Moral, Political, Literary. http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/hume-essays-moral-political-literary-lf-ed.
100.
Evers, D. & Deng, N. Acknowledgement and the paradox of tragedy. Philosophical Studies 173, 337–350 (2016).
101.
Schier, F. THE CLAIMS OF TRAGEDY: AN ESSAY IN MORAL PSYCHOLOGY AND AESTHETIC THEORY. Philosophical Papers 18, 7–26 (1989).
102.
Friend, S. The Pleasures of Documentary Tragedy. The British Journal of Aesthetics 47, 184–198 (2007).
103.
Susan L. Feagin. The Pleasures of Tragedy Original text. American Philosophical Quarterly 20, 95–104 (1983).
14/14