Penn State International Law Review Volume 17 Article 4 Number 1 Dickinson Journal of International Law 9-1-1998 Should There Be Another Ewe? A Critical Analysis of the European Union Cloning Legislation Khristan A. Heagle Follow this and additional works at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/psilr Part of the Agriculture Law Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Heagle, Khristan A. (1998) "Should There Be Another Ewe? A Critical Analysis of the European Union Cloning Legislation," Penn State International Law Review: Vol. 17: No. 1, Article 4. Available at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/psilr/vol17/iss1/4 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by Penn State Law eLibrary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Penn State International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Penn State Law eLibrary. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. [ Comments I Should There Be Another Ewe? A Critical Analysis of the European Union Cloning Legislation What would the world be like if we accepted that human 'creators' could assume the right to generate creatures in their own likeness, beings whose every biological characteristics would be subjugated to an outside will, copies of bodies that have already lived, half slaves, half fantasies of immortalities?1 I. Introduction It was the bleat2 heard around the world when the birth of Dolly,3 the first successful clone of an adult mammal,4 was * Special thanks to Dr. Robert O'Donnell whose insight and integrity remian with me; and to my parents, Melissa, Christopher, Megan, Christopher, Jennifer, and John whose love and loyalty are constant sources of encouragement.