European Fisheries Ecosystem Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

European Fisheries Ecosystem Plan European Fisheries Ecosystem Plan The North Sea significant web European Fisheries Ecosystem Plan: The North Sea significant web EU Project number: Q5RS-2001-016585 DELIVERABLE THREE S.Á. Ragnarsson and A. Jaworski Marine Research Institute, Iceland O.A.L. Paramor and C.L. Scott Dove Marine Laboratory, School of Marine Science and Technology, University of Newcastle, UK G. Piet Netherlands Institute for Fisheries Research, The Netherlands L. Hill Instituto Português de Investigação das Pescas e do Mar, Portugal ISBN 0-7017-0169-2 Authors: Stefan Aki Ragnarsson Marine Research Institute, Skulagata 4, P.O. Box 1390, 121 Reykjavik, ICELAND. e-mail: [email protected] Andrzej Jaworski Marine Research Institute, Skulagata 4, P.O. Box 1390, 121 Reykjavik, ICELAND. e-mail: [email protected] Catherine Scott Dove Marine Laboratory, School of Marine Science and Technology, University of Newcastle, Cullercoats, NE30 4PZ, UK. e-mail: [email protected] Odette Paramor Dove Marine Laboratory, School of Marine Science and Technology, University of Newcastle, Cullercoats, NE30 4PZ, UK. e-mail: [email protected] Gerjan Piet Netherlands Institute for Fisheries Research, Dept. Biology and Ecology, Haringkade 1, P.O. Box 68 1970 AB Ijmuiden, THE NETHERLANDS. e-mail: [email protected] Louize Hill Instituto Português de Investigação das Pescas e do Mar, Avenida da Brasilia, PT-1449-006, Lisboa, PORTUGAL. e-mail: [email protected] EUROPEAN FISHERIES ECOSYSTEM PLAN Preface This report describes the selection of the species and habitats which form the ‘significant web’ in the North Sea as a contribution to the development of a European Fisheries Ecosystem Plan (EFEP) (EU Project number Q5RS-2001- 01685). The aim of the EFEP project is to develop an ecosystem-based management plan for the fisheries of the North Sea. Over the last few decades, there is a growing understanding that harvesting natural resources can influence the structure and functioning of marine ecosystems. For that reason, there is an increased interest for an ecosystem-based approach to management. For an ecosystem-based management to be fully operational, it is important to identify those key species and habitats which are the major drivers in the functioning of the ecosystem, as it is not practical, or even possible, to manage the whole system. However, while it is clear that some species and habitats are not such drivers, they may as well be important to society in other ways. For example, predation pressure on fish by guillemot (Uria aalge), which is an abundant seabird species, is greater than that of the much rarer roseate tern (Sterna dougallii). Removal of all guillemots from the North Sea could lead indirectly to changes in fish community structure as a result of predatory release, while removal of roseate terns would not. However, the roseate tern is an uncommon breeding bird within the North Sea, and protected by the EU Birds’ Directive (1979) and considered of societal value. In other words, there is a societal demand to protect roseate tern in order to maintain biodiversity. An important part of the EFEP project is to develop a suite of models under which several management scenarios can be run in order to examine their effect on ecosystem components and determine whether the outcomes of these are acceptable to both the public and scientists. One step to achieve that goal is to identify those species and habitats which are the key drivers in structuring the North Sea ecosystem and construct the North Sea ‘significant web’. With growing knowledge on the effects of fishing activities on the ecosystem, there is greater interest in conserving ecosystem integrity rather than focussing on individual species. In this report, the importance of species and habitats found in the North Sea were evaluated and those which were selected, constituted as part of the significant web. Such information is of vital importance v EUROPEAN FISHERIES ECOSYSTEM PLAN for modelling work which, furthermore, will advance the development of ecosystem-based management plans for fishing activities within the North Sea. S.Á.R. Reykjavik December 2003 vi EUROPEAN FISHERIES ECOSYSTEM PLAN Index EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................xi CHAPTER ONE Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER TWO Methodology 1. Categories of importance.................................................................................... 3 2. Selection of species and habitats ........................................................................ 4 2.1 Seabirds...................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Marine mammals ....................................................................................... 7 2.3 Zooplankton ............................................................................................. 10 2.4 Fish........................................................................................................... 10 2.5 Benthos and habitats ................................................................................ 11 CHAPTER THREE Results 1. Seabirds............................................................................................................. 15 1.1 Economic importance .............................................................................. 15 1.2 Societal importance.................................................................................. 16 1.3 Ecological importance ............................................................................. 16 1.4 Functional importance ............................................................................. 20 1.5 General seabird population trends ........................................................... 24 1.6 Abundances throughout the North Sea .................................................... 24 2. Marine mammals .............................................................................................. 25 2.1 Cetaceans in the North Sea ...................................................................... 25 2.2 Pinnipeds in the North Sea....................................................................... 26 2.3 Individual summaries of cetaceans .......................................................... 26 2.3.1 Harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena ............................................. 26 2.3.2 White-beaked dolphin Lagenorhynchus albirostris .......................... 28 2.3.3 White-sided dolphin Lagenorhynchus acutus ................................... 29 2.3.4 Killer whale Orcinus orca................................................................. 30 2.3.5 Minke whale Balaenoptera acutorostrata ........................................ 30 2.3.6 Bottlenose dolphins Tursiops truncates ............................................ 31 2.3.7 Other species of cetaceans................................................................. 32 2.4 Distribution and abundances of small cetaceans in the North Sea .......... 33 2.5 Individual summaries of pinnipeds.......................................................... 38 2.5.1 Grey seal Halichoerus grypus ........................................................... 38 2.5.2 Common seal (or harbour seal) Phoca vitulina................................. 39 2.5.3 Other species of pinnipeds................................................................. 40 2.6 Seals: European status and distribution ................................................... 40 2.6.1 Grey seal Halichoerus grypus ........................................................... 40 2.6.2 Common seal Phoca vitulina ............................................................ 45 3. Zooplankton...................................................................................................... 48 3.1 Copepods ................................................................................................. 48 3.2 Individual summaries for zooplankton .................................................... 49 4. Fish ................................................................................................................... 56 vii EUROPEAN FISHERIES ECOSYSTEM PLAN 4.1 Dogfishes (Pleurotremata, Scyliorhinidae) ..............................................56 4.2 Skates and rays (Hypotremata, Rajidae) ..................................................57 4.3 Isopondyli, Clupeidae...............................................................................59 4.4 Anacanthini, Gadidae...............................................................................65 4.5 Red mullet (Percomorphi, Mullidae) .......................................................78 4.6 Sandeels (Ammodytidae) .........................................................................79 4.7 Trachinidae...............................................................................................87 4.8 Mackerels and tunnies (Scombridae) .......................................................88 4.9 Gobiidae ...................................................................................................90 4.10 Callionymidae ..........................................................................................95 4.11 Scleroparei, Gurnards (Triglidae) ............................................................97 4.12 Bullheads and sculpins (Cottidae)............................................................99
Recommended publications
  • Anchialine Cave Biology in the Era of Speleogenomics Jorge L
    International Journal of Speleology 45 (2) 149-170 Tampa, FL (USA) May 2016 Available online at scholarcommons.usf.edu/ijs International Journal of Speleology Off icial Journal of Union Internationale de Spéléologie Life in the Underworld: Anchialine cave biology in the era of speleogenomics Jorge L. Pérez-Moreno1*, Thomas M. Iliffe2, and Heather D. Bracken-Grissom1 1Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Biscayne Bay Campus, North Miami FL 33181, USA 2Department of Marine Biology, Texas A&M University at Galveston, Galveston, TX 77553, USA Abstract: Anchialine caves contain haline bodies of water with underground connections to the ocean and limited exposure to open air. Despite being found on islands and peninsular coastlines around the world, the isolation of anchialine systems has facilitated the evolution of high levels of endemism among their inhabitants. The unique characteristics of anchialine caves and of their predominantly crustacean biodiversity nominate them as particularly interesting study subjects for evolutionary biology. However, there is presently a distinct scarcity of modern molecular methods being employed in the study of anchialine cave ecosystems. The use of current and emerging molecular techniques, e.g., next-generation sequencing (NGS), bestows an exceptional opportunity to answer a variety of long-standing questions pertaining to the realms of speciation, biogeography, population genetics, and evolution, as well as the emergence of extraordinary morphological and physiological adaptations to these unique environments. The integration of NGS methodologies with traditional taxonomic and ecological methods will help elucidate the unique characteristics and evolutionary history of anchialine cave fauna, and thus the significance of their conservation in face of current and future anthropogenic threats.
    [Show full text]
  • Coll Survey June 2003 Summary Report
    Coll Survey kelp forest June 2003 3-bearded rockling Summary Report nudibranch Cuthona caerulea bloody Henry starfish and elegant anemones snake pipefish and sea cucumber diver and soft corals North-west Coast SS Nevada Sgeir Bousd Cairns of Coll Sites 22-28 were exposed, rocky offshore reefs reaching a seabed of The wreck of the SS Nevada (Site 14) lies with the upper Sites 15-17 were offshore rocky reefs, slightly less wave exposed but more Off the northern end of Coll, the clean, coarse sediments at around 30m. Eilean an Ime (Site 23) was parts against a steep rock slope at 8m, and lower part on current exposed than those further west. Rock slopes were covered with kelp Cairns (Sites 5-7) are swept by split by a narrow vertical gully from near the surface to 15m, providing a a mixed seabed at around 16m. The wreck still has some in shallow water, with dabberlocks Alaria esculenta in the sublittoral fringe at very strong currents on most spectacular swim-through. In shallow water there was dense cuvie kelp large pieces intact, providing homes for a variety of Site 17. A wide range of animals was found on rock slopes down to around states of the tide, with little slack forest, with patches of jewel and elegant anemones on vertical rock. animals and seaweeds. On the elevated parts of the 20m, including the rare seaslug Okenia aspersa, and the snake pipefish water. These were very scenic Below 15-20m rock and boulder slopes had a varied fauna of dense soft wreck, bushy bryozoans, soft corals, lightbulb seasquirts Entelurus aequorius.
    [Show full text]
  • Age, Growth and Population Dynamics of Lemon Sole Microstomus Kitt(Walbaum 1792)
    Age, growth and population dynamics of lemon sole Microstomus kitt (Walbaum 1792) sampled off the west coast of Ireland By Joan F. Hannan Masters Thesis in Fish Biology Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology Supervisors of Research Dr. Pauline King and Dr. David McGrath Submitted to the Higher Education and Training Awards Council July 2002 Age, growth and population dynamics of lemon sole Microstomus kitt (Walbaum 1792) sampled off the west coast of Ireland Joan F. Hannan ABSTRACT The age, growth, maturity and population dynamics o f lemon sole (Microstomus kitt), captured off the west coast o f Ireland (ICES division Vllb), were determined for the period November 2000 to February 2002. The maximum age recorded was 14 years. Males o f the population were dominated by 4 year olds, while females were dominated by 5 year olds. Females dominated the sex ratio in the overall sample, each month sampled, at each age and from 22cm in total length onwards (when N > 20). Possible reasons for the dominance o f females in the sex ratio are discussed. Three models were used to obtain the parameters o f the von Bertalanfly growth equation. These were the Ford-Walford plot (Beverton and Holt 1957), the Gulland and Holt plot (1959) and the Rafail (1973) method. Results o f the fitted von Bertalanffy growth curves showed that female lemon sole o ff the west coast o f Ireland grew faster than males and attained a greater size. Male and female lemon sole mature from 2 years o f age onwards. There is evidence in the population o f a smaller asymptotic length (L«, = 34.47cm), faster growth rate (K = 0.1955) and younger age at first maturity, all o f which are indicative o f a decrease in population size, when present results are compared to data collected in the same area 22 years earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • Sol E I Da E of the Eastern North Atlantic
    FICHES D’IDENTIFICATION DU ZOOPLANCTON EditCes par J. H. FRASER Marine Laboratory, P.O. Box 101, Victoria Road, Aberdeen AB9 8DB, Scotland FICHE NO. 1501151 SOL E I DA E OF THE EASTERN NORTH ATLANTIC J. H. Nichols Fisheries Laboratory Lowestoft, Suffolk NR 33 OHT, England (This sheet may be referred to in the following form: Nichols, J. H. 1976. Soleidae, Fich. Ident. Zooplancton 150/151: .10 pp.) https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5120 Conseil International pour 1’Exploration de la Mer Charlottenlund Slot, DK-2920 Charlottenlund Danemark SEPTEMBRE 1976 2 INTRODUCTION This sheet deals in detail with the four species of Soleidae occurring commonly within the areas listed in Table 1. The Soleidae are a warm- water family, reaching the northerly limit of their distribution in the northern North Sea. Consequently, many more genera are found south of the Atlantic area covered by Table 1, and in the Mediterranean. The adult of one of the southerly genera Dicologlossu uzeviu, has been recorded once in the western English Channel and it also occurs occasionally in the southern part of the Bay of Biscay. Insufficient information on the egg and larval development of this genus, and the rare deep-water form Buthysoleu profondicolu, is available for them to be included here. This sheet should be used together with no. 4-6, (NICHOLS,1971), on the Pleuronectidae, which includes a key to the families in the order Hetero- somata. The information on material and methods in that sheet is also applicable here. Since its publication I have found the use of a polarized light system on a steroscopic microsccpe extremely useful for counting vertebrae and myotomes when these are necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 13.2 Marine Ecology and Biodiversity Baseline Conditions
    THE LONDON RESORT PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION REPORT Appendix 13.2 Marine Ecology and Biodiversity Baseline Conditions WATER QUALITY 13.2.1. The principal water quality data sources that have been used to inform this study are: • Environment Agency (EA) WFD classification status and reporting (e.g. EA 2015); and • EA long-term water quality monitoring data for the tidal Thames. Environment Agency WFD Classification Status 13.2.2. The tidal River Thames is divided into three transitional water bodies as part of the Thames River Basin Management Plan (EA 2015) (Thames Upper [ID GB530603911403], Thames Middle [ID GB53060391140] and Thames Lower [ID GB530603911401]. Each of these waterbodies are classified as heavily modified waterbodies (HMWBs). The most recent EA assessment carried out in 2016, confirms that all three of these water bodies are classified as being at Moderate ecological potential (EA 2018). 13.2.3. The Thames Estuary at the London Resort Project Site is located within the Thames Middle Transitional water body, which is a heavily modified water body on account of the following designated uses (Cycle 2 2015-2021): • Coastal protection; • Flood protection; and • Navigation. 13.2.4. The downstream extent of the Thames Middle transitional water body is located approximately 12 km downstream of the Kent Project Site and 8 km downstream of the Essex Project Site near Lower Hope Point. Downstream of this location is the Thames Lower water body which extends to the outer Thames Estuary. 13.2.5. A summary of the current Thames Middle water body WFD status is presented in Table A13.2.1, together with those supporting elements that do not currently meet at least Good status and their associated objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics, Phylogeny, and Taphonomy of Ghost Shrimps (Decapoda): a Perspective from the Fossil Record
    73 (3): 401 – 437 23.12.2015 © Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 2015. Systematics, phylogeny, and taphonomy of ghost shrimps (Decapoda): a perspective from the fossil record Matúš Hyžný *, 1, 2 & Adiël A. Klompmaker 3 1 Geological-Paleontological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria; Matúš Hyžný [hyzny.matus@ gmail.com] — 2 Department of Geology and Paleontology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina, Ilkovičova 6, SVK-842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia — 3 Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, 1659 Museum Road, PO Box 117800, Gaines- ville, FL 32611, USA; Adiël A. Klompmaker [[email protected]] — * Correspond ing author Accepted 06.viii.2015. Published online at www.senckenberg.de/arthropod-systematics on 14.xii.2015. Editor in charge: Stefan Richter. Abstract Ghost shrimps of Callianassidae and Ctenochelidae are soft-bodied, usually heterochelous decapods representing major bioturbators of muddy and sandy (sub)marine substrates. Ghost shrimps have a robust fossil record spanning from the Early Cretaceous (~ 133 Ma) to the Holocene and their remains are present in most assemblages of Cenozoic decapod crustaceans. Their taxonomic interpretation is in flux, mainly because the generic assignment is hindered by their insufficient preservation and disagreement in the biological classification. Fur- thermore, numerous taxa are incorrectly classified within the catch-all taxonCallianassa . To show the historical patterns in describing fos- sil ghost shrimps and to evaluate taphonomic aspects influencing the attribution of ghost shrimp remains to higher level taxa, a database of all fossil species treated at some time as belonging to the group has been compiled: 250 / 274 species are considered valid ghost shrimp taxa herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of Jaxea Kuemeli BACHMAYER, 1954 (Decapoda
    N. Jb. Geol. Palaont. Abh. 260/2, 173-184 Article published online March 2011 Revision of Jaxea kuemeli BACHMAYER, 1954 (Decapoda: Gebiidea: Laomediidae) from the Miocene of Europe, with remarks on the palaeobiogeography of the genus Jaxea NARDO, 1847 Matus Hyzny With 7 figures and 2 tables HYZNY,M. (2011): Revision of Jaxea kuemeli BACHMAYER,1954 (Decapoda: Gebiidea: Laomediidae) from the Miocene of Europe, with remarks on the palaeobiogeography of the genus Jaxea NARDO, 1847. - N. lb. Geol. Paliiont. Abh., 260: 173-184; Stuttgart. Abstract: The present contribution reevaluates the fossil record of the genus Jaxea (Decapoda: Ge- biidea: Laomediidae) and gives an emended diagnosis and an updated description of Jaxea kuemeli based on well preserved material from the lower and middle Miocene strata of Austria, Slovakia and Hungary. The species is distinguished from the extant J. nocturna on the basis of the tooth formula of the chelipeds. The geographic distribution and the palaeobiogeography of the genus is discussed and migration from the Tethys eastward towards the present-day Indo-Pacific Ocean during the Miocene time is proposed. The fossil record of the family Laomediidae is shortly reviewed. The monotypical genus Reschia from the Tithonian of southern Germany once tentatively assigned to Laomediidae is excluded from the family. Key words: Decapoda, Laomediidae, Jaxea, Miocene, palaeobiogeography. 1. Introduction A recent study of the type material of Jaxea kuemeli oriented cervical groove. However, a re-examination BACHMAYER,1954 from the middle Miocene of the of the type material has now revealed that what was Vienna Basin, plus additional specimens from sev- described as a complete dorsal carapace is only a frag- erallocalities in Austria, Slovakia and Hungary (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas of North Sea Fishes
    ICES COOPERATIVE RESEARCH REPORT RAPPORT DES RECHERCHES COLLECTIVES NO. 194 Atlas of North Sea Fishes Based on bottom-trawl survey data for the years 1985—1987 Ruud J. Knijn1, Trevor W. Boon2, Henk J. L. Heessen1, and John R. G. Hislop3 'Netherlands Institute for Fisheries Research, Haringkade 1, PO Box 6 8 , 1970 AB Umuiden, The Netherlands 2MAFF, Fisheries Laboratory, Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 OHT, England 3Marine Laboratory, PO Box 101, Victoria Road, Aberdeen AB9 8 DB, Scotland Fish illustrations by Peter Stebbing International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer Palægade 2—4, DK-1261 Copenhagen K, Denmark September 1993 Copyright ® 1993 All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by photostat or microfilm or stored in a storage system or retrieval system or by any other means without written permission from the authors and the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Illustrations ® 1993 Peter Stebbing Published with financial support from the Directorate-General for Fisheries, AIR Programme, of the Commission of the European Communities ICES Cooperative Research Report No. 194 Atlas of North Sea Fishes ISSN 1017-6195 Printed in Denmark Contents 1. Introduction............................................................................................................... 1 2. Recruit surveys.................................................................................. 3 2.1 General purpose of the surveys.....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fish and Fish Populations
    Intended for Energinet Document type Report Date March 2021 THOR OWF TECHNICAL REPORT – FISH AND FISH POPULATIONS THOR OWF TECHNICAL REPORT – FISH AND FISH POPULATIONS Project name Thor OWF environmental investigations Ramboll Project no. 1100040575 Hannemanns Allé 53 Recipient Margot Møller Nielsen, Signe Dons (Energinet) DK-2300 Copenhagen S Document no 1100040575-1246582228-4 Denmark Version 5.0 (final) T +45 5161 1000 Date 05/03/2021 F +45 5161 1001 Prepared by Louise Dahl Kristensen, Sanne Kjellerup, Danni J. Jensen, Morten Warnick https://ramboll.com Stæhr Checked by Anna Schriver Approved by Lea Bjerre Schmidt Description Technical report on fish and fish populations. Rambøll Danmark A/S DK reg.no. 35128417 Member of FRI Ramboll - THOR oWF TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Summary 4 2. Introduction 6 2.1 Background 6 3. Project Plan 7 3.1 Turbines 8 3.2 Foundations 8 3.3 Export cables 8 4. Methods And Materials 9 4.1 Geophysical survey 9 4.1.1 Depth 10 4.1.2 Seabed sediment type characterization 10 4.2 Fish survey 11 4.2.1 Sampling method 12 4.2.2 Analysis of catches 13 5. Baseline Situation 15 5.1 Description of gross area of Thor OWF 15 5.1.1 Water depth 15 5.1.2 Seabed sediment 17 5.1.3 Protected species and marine habitat types 17 5.2 Key species 19 5.2.1 Cod (Gadus morhua L.) 20 5.2.2 European plaice (Pleuronectes platessa L.) 20 5.2.3 Sole (Solea solea L.) 21 5.2.4 Turbot (Psetta maxima L.) 21 5.2.5 Dab (Limanda limanda) 22 5.2.6 Solenette (Buglossidium luteum) 22 5.2.7 Herring (Clupea harengus) 22 5.2.8 Sand goby (Pomatoschistus minutus) 22 5.2.9 Sprat (Sprattus sprattus L.) 23 5.2.10 Sandeel (Ammodytes marinus R.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Fishes from Galicia (NW Spain): an Updated Checklist
    1 2 Marine fishes from Galicia (NW Spain): an updated checklist 3 4 5 RAFAEL BAÑON1, DAVID VILLEGAS-RÍOS2, ALBERTO SERRANO3, 6 GONZALO MUCIENTES2,4 & JUAN CARLOS ARRONTE3 7 8 9 10 1 Servizo de Planificación, Dirección Xeral de Recursos Mariños, Consellería de Pesca 11 e Asuntos Marítimos, Rúa do Valiño 63-65, 15703 Santiago de Compostela, Spain. E- 12 mail: [email protected] 13 2 CSIC. Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas. Eduardo Cabello 6, 36208 Vigo 14 (Pontevedra), Spain. E-mail: [email protected] (D. V-R); [email protected] 15 (G.M.). 16 3 Instituto Español de Oceanografía, C.O. de Santander, Santander, Spain. E-mail: 17 [email protected] (A.S); [email protected] (J.-C. A). 18 4Centro Tecnológico del Mar, CETMAR. Eduardo Cabello s.n., 36208. Vigo 19 (Pontevedra), Spain. 20 21 Abstract 22 23 An annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Galician waters is presented. The list 24 is based on historical literature records and new revisions. The ichthyofauna list is 25 composed by 397 species very diversified in 2 superclass, 3 class, 35 orders, 139 1 1 families and 288 genus. The order Perciformes is the most diverse one with 37 families, 2 91 genus and 135 species. Gobiidae (19 species) and Sparidae (19 species) are the 3 richest families. Biogeographically, the Lusitanian group includes 203 species (51.1%), 4 followed by 149 species of the Atlantic (37.5%), then 28 of the Boreal (7.1%), and 17 5 of the African (4.3%) groups. We have recognized 41 new records, and 3 other records 6 have been identified as doubtful.
    [Show full text]
  • Cancer Pagurus) in Norway - Effect of Temperature and Other Environmental Parameters at High Latitudes
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334051811 Life history and distribution of the edible crab (Cancer pagurus) in Norway - Effect of temperature and other environmental parameters at high latitudes Thesis · May 2019 CITATION READS 1 159 1 author: Snorre Bakke Norwegian University of Science and Technology 39 PUBLICATIONS 150 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: CLIMA: Changes in fish distribution and species composition as a result of climatic changes in the East Greenland Ecosystem: implications for fisheries and management View project Availability of essential and toxic elements from marine resources View project All content following this page was uploaded by Snorre Bakke on 31 March 2020. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics Life history and distribution of the edible crab (Cancer pagurus) in Norway Effect of temperature and other environmental parameters at high latitudes — Snorre Bakke A dissertation for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor – May 2019 Life history and distribution of the edible crab (Cancer pagurus) in Norway Effect of temperature and other environmental parameters at high latitudes Snorre Bakke Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor in Natural Science Ålesund/Tromsø, Norway May 2019 Graduating institute: Department
    [Show full text]