DOCSLIB.ORG

Barents Protected Area Network Recommendations for Strengthening the Protected Area Network in the Barents Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Barents Protected Area Network Recommendations for Strengthening the Protected Area Network in the Barents Region BPAN POLICY BRIEF | WWW.BPAN.FI | 5.12.2013 Barents Protected Area Network Recommendations for Strengthening the Protected Area Network in the Barents Region There is a need for prompt establishment of planned protected areas and conservation of the last intact forests. • In February 2010 in Tromsø, Norway, the Barents environment ministers urged further steps to protect the last intact boreal forests and underlined the importance of identifying and establishing a representative network of protected areas in the Barents Region (BPAN). The importance of BPAN was further confirmed in November 2013 by the chair of the Barents Euro-Arctic Council. • The countries of the Barents Euro-Arctic Region have a special responsibility to conserve biodiversity, since the valuable ecosystems of the region represent natural heritage of global significance. In addition, its intact forest, mire and tundra ecosystems are enermous carbon stores. • The most significant threats to biodiversity in the Barents Region are habitat loss, degradation and fragmentation, as well as rapidly changing climate. Increasing and too often unsustainable use of natural resources creates a serious threat to natural environment and ecosystems. An ecologically functioning and well connected protected area network serves - even by itself - as an effective tool for biodiversity conservation and also mitigates the impacts of climate change and helps the nature and people in adaptation to changing environmental conditions. 10°E 20°E 30°E 40°E 50°E 60°E 70°E 70°N a CLASS OF PROTECTION y Strong protection Planned protected area ALL THE BPAN PILOT l m Medium level protection BPAN Pilot sites SITES ARE HIGH e KARA Weak protection Border of the Barents Region Z CONSERVATION VALUE a AREAS. BPAN PROJECT y SEA HAS IMPLEMENTED a v Tromsø o NORWEGIAN ACTIVITIES TO SUPPORT N 70°N THEIRBARENTS CONSERVATION AS Finnmark Vaygach island SEA Troms Vadsø STATUTORY PROTECTED AREAS.SEA Bodø Kolguyev island Murmansk Nordland Murmansk 65°N Region Lapland Nenets Nar'yan Mar Autonomous Norrbotten Rovaniemi Okrug Luleå Väster- botten Oulu 65°N Umeå Northern Ostrobothnia Kainuu Kajaani Arkhangelsk Republic GULF OF of Karelia Arkhangelsk Republic of Komi BOTHNIA Region 60°N BARENTS PROTECTED Petrozavodsk Syktyvkar AREA NETWORK BPAN project 2013, SYKE and Transparent World. 60°N Protected areas are shown as of 8th March 2013. © The Norwegian Directorate for Nature Management © The Karelian Regional Nature Conservancy © Finnish Environment institute, SYKE © WWF Arkhangelsk office © ELY Centres © Centre of Nature Management and Environmental Monitoring © Lantmäteriet © Forest Committee of the Republic of Komi © Metsähallitus © Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection of the Republicof Komi 0 100 200 300 km © Transparent World © Territorial Information Center for Natural Resources and © Kola Biodiversity30°E Conservation Center EnvironmentProtection of the Republic40°E of Komi 50°E 60°E THE BARENTS REGION CONSISTS OF A TOTAL AREA OF 1,8 MILLION KM² IN THE NORTHERNMOST PARTS OF NORWAY, SWEDEN, FINLAND AND NORTHWEST RUSSIA. FOR APPROXIMATELY 40% OF THE PROTECTED AREA, THE PROTECTION AGAINST LAND USE IS INADEQUATE TO GUARANTEE CONSERVATION OF TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS. MOST OF THESE PROTECTED AREAS ARE SITUATED IN NORTHWEST RUSSIA. Urgent need to protect unique Analysis of the network boreal and arctic nature of protected areas The primary aim of the Barents Protected Area Network (BPAN) The BPAN project has harmonised and analysed information on project is to promote and support the development of a representative protected areas in the Barents Region including their distribution and protected area network in the Barents Euro-Arctic Region to conserve ecological representativeness in proportion to the main ecosystems. biodiversity of boreal and arctic ecosystems, particularly forests and A network of protected areas is under development in the Barents wetlands. The BPAN project is a key biodiversity project of the Barents Region. Gap analyses have been conducted to determine the most Euro-Arctic Council’s (BEAC) Working Group on Environment and important sites for biodiversity conservation and many of these its subgroup on nature protection. are included in the national and regional plans to be established The BPAN project contributes to the internationally agreed as protected areas. Aichi Biodiversity Targets of the Convention on Biological Diversity In the Barents Region 13,2% (231 600 km2) of the terrestrial area (CBD) to halt the loss of biodiversity by 2020. Barents Protected is protected for biodiversity conservation. Countries and regions Area Network is a regional initiative to implement the Programme of the Barents Region are in the process of implementing nature of Work on Protected Areas of the CBD. conservation plans which include establishing 59 400 km2 as The BPAN project was implemented in 2010–2013 by nature protected areas. If all planned protected areas were established as conservation authorities, scientific institutes and nature conservation statutory protected areas, the level of protection would increase non-governmental organisations with funding from the Nordic to cover 16,6% of the total area. However, as some of these areas Council of Ministers, the Governments of Finland, Sweden and are not planned to be established by 2020, the current pace of Norway, WWF Russia and other participating organisations. implementation of nature conservation plans is inadequate for the attempts of the Region to achieve the Aichi Target 11. AICHI BIODIVERSITY TARGET 11 ”By 2020, at least 17 per cent of terrestrial and inland water areas and 10 per cent of coastal and marine areas, especially areas of particular importance AICHI BIODIVERSITY TARGET 5 for biodiversity and ecosystem services, are conserved through effectively and ”By 2020, the rate of loss of all natural habitats, including forests, is at equitably managed, ecologically representative and well-connected systems least halved and where feasible brought close to zero, and degradation and of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures, fragmentation is significantly reduced.” and integrated into the wider landscape and seascape.” 10°E 20°E 30°E 40°E 50°E 60°E 70°E 70°N a CLASS OF PROTECTION y Strong protection Planned protected area l m Medium level protection BPAN Pilot sites e KARA Weak protection Border of the Barents Region Z THE MAIN ECOSYSTEMS IN THE BARENTS REGION (%) LEVEL OF PROTECTION IN MAIN ECOSYSTEMS (%) a 60 50 y SEA 55,8% a 48,3% v Tromsø o 50 NORWEGIAN N BARENTS 70°N 40 Finnmark Vaygach island SEA Troms Vadsø 40 SEA 30 Bodø 30 Kolguyev island Murmansk 20,2% 20 20 Nordland Murmansk 65°N 14,5% 15,7% 12,6% 12,6% Region 11,4% Lapland Nenets Nar'yan 10 10 Mar Autonomous 5,6% Norrbotten Rovaniemi Okrug 2,15% Luleå 0 0 Väster- FOREST ALPINE AND OPEN GLACIER FRESH FOREST ALPINE AND OPEN GLACIER FRESH botten LOWLAND WETLAND WATER LOWLAND WETLAND WATER Oulu 65°N TUNDRA TUNDRA Umeå Northern Ostrobothnia Kainuu Kajaani Arkhangelsk Republic GULF OF of Karelia Arkhangelsk Republic of Komi BOTHNIA Region OTHER FRESH 10°W 0° 0,9% 10°E 20°E 30°E 40°E 50°E 60°E 70°E 80°E 90°E 60°N WATER 60°E TO REACH THE AICHI 10°W 0°E 20°E 50°E BIODIVERSITY TARGETS 90°E 75°N 5,3% 30°E FORESTS MORE FORESTS AND GLACIERS 80°N Petrozavodsk Syktyvkar 48,2% 7,8% WETLANDS NEED TO BE PROTECTED.80°E BPAN project 2013, SYKE and Transparent World. 60°N th Protected areas are shown as of 8 March 2013. 75°N © The Norwegian Directorate for Nature Management © The Karelian Regional Nature Conservancy OPEN © Finnish Environment institute, SYKE © WWF Arkhangelsk office 70°E © ELY Centres © Centre of Nature Management and Environmental Monitoring LAND COVER WETLANDS © Lantmäteriet © Forest Committee of the Republic of Komi © Metsähallitus © Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection of the Republicof Komi 0 100 200 300 km © Transparent World © Territorial Information Center for Natural Resources and 13,8% © Kola Biodiversity30°E Conservation Center EnvironmentProtection of the Republic40°E of Komi 50°E 60°E IN EXISTING PROTECTED AREAS ALPINE AND 40°E 70°N LOWLAND TUNDRA a y 24% l m KARA e NORWEGIAN Z 70°N a SEA SEA y a BARENTS v Tromsø o Finnmark N Vaygach island Troms SEA Vadsø Bodø nd lguyev isla Murmansk Ko Nordland 65°N Murmansk Lapland Region Norrbotten Nar'yan Rovaniemi Nenets Mar Autonomous Väster- Luleå 65°N botten Okrug Oulu Umeå WHITE SEA Kajaani Kainuu Republic Arkhangelsk of Karelia Republic of Komi BPAN project 2013 SYKE and Transparent World 60°N Protected areas are shown as of 8th March 2013. © The Norwegian Directorate for Nature Management Arkhangelsk © Finnish Environment institute, SYKE Region © ELY Centres Petrozavodsk © Lantmäteriet Syktyvkar 60°N © Metsähallitus © Transparent World © Kola Biodiversity Conservation Center © The Karelian Regional Nature Conservancy © WWF Arkhangelsk office © Centre of Nature Management and Environmental Monitoring © Forest Committee of the Republic of Komi © Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection of the Republicof Komi © Territorial Information Center for Natural Resources and EnvironmentProtection of the Republic of Komi 0 200 400 600 800 km 20°E 30°E 40°E 50°E 60°E BPAN POLICY BRIEF | WWW.BPAN.FI | 5.12.2013 RECOMMENDATIONS The protected area network in the Barents Region needs to be further strengthened in order to contribute to the achievement of CBD Aichi Biodiversity Targets and other international commitments. That implies: • Results of national and regional gap analyses on high conservation value areas and representativeness of the protected area network should be taken into consideration. Representativeness of the protected area network should be assured through the establishment of protected areas in under-represented habitats and ecosystems. • There is a need for prompt establishment of planned protected areas as statutory protected areas by 2020. • In particular, large intact areas need to be prioritised for protection as they are crucial in maintaining ecological processes and ecosystem functions, and are under pressure from intensified land use.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure- Present State And
    Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure – Present State and Future Potential By Claes Lykke Ragner FNI Report 13/2000 FRIDTJOF NANSENS INSTITUTT THE FRIDTJOF NANSEN INSTITUTE Tittel/Title Sider/Pages Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure – Present 124 State and Future Potential Publikasjonstype/Publication Type Nummer/Number FNI Report 13/2000 Forfatter(e)/Author(s) ISBN Claes Lykke Ragner 82-7613-400-9 Program/Programme ISSN 0801-2431 Prosjekt/Project Sammendrag/Abstract The report assesses the Northern Sea Route’s commercial potential and economic importance, both as a transit route between Europe and Asia, and as an export route for oil, gas and other natural resources in the Russian Arctic. First, it conducts a survey of past and present Northern Sea Route (NSR) cargo flows. Then follow discussions of the route’s commercial potential as a transit route, as well as of its economic importance and relevance for each of the Russian Arctic regions. These discussions are summarized by estimates of what types and volumes of NSR cargoes that can realistically be expected in the period 2000-2015. This is then followed by a survey of the status quo of the NSR infrastructure (above all the ice-breakers, ice-class cargo vessels and ports), with estimates of its future capacity. Based on the estimated future NSR cargo potential, future NSR infrastructure requirements are calculated and compared with the estimated capacity in order to identify the main, future infrastructure bottlenecks for NSR operations. The information presented in the report is mainly compiled from data and research results that were published through the International Northern Sea Route Programme (INSROP) 1993-99, but considerable updates have been made using recent information, statistics and analyses from various sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite Ice Extent, Sea Surface Temperature, and Atmospheric 2 Methane Trends in the Barents and Kara Seas
    The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2018-237 Manuscript under review for journal The Cryosphere Discussion started: 22 November 2018 c Author(s) 2018. CC BY 4.0 License. 1 Satellite ice extent, sea surface temperature, and atmospheric 2 methane trends in the Barents and Kara Seas 1 2 3 2 4 3 Ira Leifer , F. Robert Chen , Thomas McClimans , Frank Muller Karger , Leonid Yurganov 1 4 Bubbleology Research International, Inc., Solvang, CA, USA 2 5 University of Southern Florida, USA 3 6 SINTEF Ocean, Trondheim, Norway 4 7 University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA 8 Correspondence to: Ira Leifer ([email protected]) 9 10 Abstract. Over a decade (2003-2015) of satellite data of sea-ice extent, sea surface temperature (SST), and methane 11 (CH4) concentrations in lower troposphere over 10 focus areas within the Barents and Kara Seas (BKS) were 12 analyzed for anomalies and trends relative to the Barents Sea. Large positive CH4 anomalies were discovered around 13 Franz Josef Land (FJL) and offshore west Novaya Zemlya in early fall. Far smaller CH4 enhancement was found 14 around Svalbard, downstream and north of known seabed seepage. SST increased in all focus areas at rates from 15 0.0018 to 0.15 °C yr-1, CH4 growth spanned 3.06 to 3.49 ppb yr-1. 16 The strongest SST increase was observed each year in the southeast Barents Sea in June due to strengthening of 17 the warm Murman Current (MC), and in the south Kara Sea in September. The southeast Barents Sea, the south 18 Kara Sea and coastal areas around FJL exhibited the strongest CH4 growth over the observation period.
    [Show full text]
  • Expedition Project “Arctic Floating University -2018” «Terrae Novae»
    Expedition Project “Arctic Floating University -2018” «Terrae Novae» Expedition Dates: July 21- August 9, 2017 Expedition Duration: 20 days Expedition Organizers: Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov; Roshydromet. Expedition Route: Arkhangelsk – Russkaya Gavan' Bay (Novaya Zemlya) – Malye Oransky Islands – Zhelaniya Cape – Murmantsa Bay (Gemskerka Island)– Ledenaya Gavan` Bay – Middendorfa Cape – Noviy Bay – Shubert Bay – Litke Bay – Kurochkina Cape – Menshikov Cape – Varnek (Vaigach Island) – Bugrino (Kolguyev Island) – Solovetsky Islands – Arkhangelsk. Expedition participants: 58 people (students, post-graduate students, research fellows of both Russian and foreign scientific and academic institutions) Partners participating in the expedition: Russian Geographical Society, Russian Arctic National Park, Lomonosov Moscow State University, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Federal Polytechnic School of Lausanne. Aims of the expedition: acquiring new knowledge about the state and changes in the ecosystem of the coastal areas of Novaya Zemlya archipelago; training of young specialists of the Arctic-focused specialties: hydrometeorology, ecology, arctic biology, geography, ethnopolitology, international law etc.; development of scientific and educational cooperation with the Arctic Council countries in the framework of the high-latitude Arctic expeditions; popularization of the Russian scientific, historical, cultural and natural heritage and polar specialties among the youth, development of patriotism
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns and Drivers of Megabenthic Secondary Production on the Barents Sea Shelf
    Vol. 546: 1–16, 2016 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published March 21 doi: 10.3354/meps11662 Mar Ecol Prog Ser OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS FEATURE ARTICLE Patterns and drivers of megabenthic secondary production on the Barents Sea shelf Renate Degen1,*, Lis Lindal Jørgensen2, Pavel Ljubin3, Ingrid H. Ellingsen4, Hendrik Pehlke1, Thomas Brey1 1Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany 2Institute of Marine Research, 9294 Tromsø, Norway 3Polar Research Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography, 183038 Murmansk, Russia 4SINTEF Fisheries and Aquaculture, Brattørkaia 17C, 7010 Trondheim, Norway ABSTRACT: Megabenthos plays a major role in the overall energy flow on Arctic shelves, but information on megabenthic secondary production on large spatial scales is scarce. Here, we estimated for the first time megabenthic secondary production for the entire Bar- ents Sea shelf by applying a species-based empirical model to an extensive dataset from the joint Norwe- gian−Russian ecosystem survey. Spatial patterns and relationships were analyzed within a GIS. The environ- mental drivers behind the observed production pattern were identified by applying an ordinary least squares regression model. Geographically weighted regression (GWR) was used to examine the varying relationship of secondary production and the environment on a shelf- wide scale. Significantly higher megabenthic second- ary production was found in the northeastern, season- ally ice-covered regions of the Barents Sea than in the permanently ice-free southwest. The environmental parameters that significantly relate to the observed pat- tern are bottom temperature and salinity, sea ice cover, new primary production, trawling pressure, and bottom current speed.
    [Show full text]
  • Akvaplan-Niva Report
    Seabirds contaminant data: Compilation and portraying of Norwegian and Russian data on contaminant levels in the ecosystems of the Barents, Pechora and White Sea. Seabirds. Report APN-414.4576 N-9296 Tromsø, Norway Tel. +47 77 75 03 00 Fax +47 77 75 03 01 Rapporttittel /Report title Seabirds contaminant data: Compilation and portraying of Norwegian and Russian data on contaminant levels in the ecosystems of the Barents, Pechora and White Sea. Forfatter(e) / Author(s) Akvaplan-niva rapport nr / report no: Vladimir Savinov, Akvaplan-niva, APN-414.4576 Tromsø, Norway Dato / Date: 135/05 2009 Antall sider / No. of pages 9 + CD Distribusjon / Distribution Open Oppdragsgiver / Client Oppdragsg. ref. / Client ref. NPI Geir Wing Gabrielsen Sammendrag / Summary The report presents compilation of Norwegian and Russian data on contaminant levels in seabirds from the Barents and Pechora Seas Emneord: Key words: Biota Biota Sjøfugl Seabirds Miljøgifter Environmental contaminants Barentshavet, Pechorasøen Barents Sea Prosjektleder / Project manager Kvalitetskontroll / Quality control Vladimir Savinov Lars-Henrik Larsen Vladimir Savinov Lars-Henrik Larsen © 2010 Akvaplan-niva ISBN 00-00-00000-0 Akvaplan-niva AS. Rapport APN-414.4576 Table of Content 1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 5 2 Goal of the project ............................................................................................................... 5 3 Results ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Barents Protected Area Network Recommendations for Strengthening the Protected Area Network in the Barents Region
    BPAN POLICY BRIEF | WWW.bpan.FI | 5.12.2013 Barents Protected Area Network Recommendations for Strengthening the Protected Area Network in the Barents Region There is a need for prompt establishment of planned protected areas and conservation of the last intact forests. • In February 2010 in Tromsø, Norway, the Barents environment ministers urged further steps to protect the last intact boreal forests and underlined the importance of identifying and establishing a representative network of protected areas in the Barents Region (BPAN). The importance of BPAN was further confirmed in November 2013 by the chair of the Barents Euro-Arctic Council. • The countries of the Barents Euro-Arctic Region have a special responsibility to conserve biodiversity, since the valuable ecosystems of the region represent natural heritage of global significance. In addition, its intact forest, mire and tundra ecosystems are enermous carbon stores. • The most significant threats to biodiversity in the Barents Region are habitat loss, degradation and fragmentation, as well as rapidly changing climate. Increasing and too often unsustainable use of natural resources creates a serious threat to natural environment and ecosystems. An ecologically functioning and well connected protected area network serves - even by itself - as an effective tool for biodiversity conservation and also mitigates the impacts of climate change and helps the nature and people in adaptation to changing environmental conditions. 10°E 20°E 30°E 40°E 50°E 60°E 70°E 70°N a CLASS OF PROTECTION y Strong protection Planned protected area All ThE BPAN piloT l m Medium level protection BPAN Pilot sites sites are hIgh e KARA Weak protection Border of the Barents Region Z CoNservatioN vAluE a areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Strong Winds on the Coasts of the Russian Arctic Seas
    Ecologica Montenegrina 25: 14-25 (2019) This journal is available online at: www.biotaxa.org/em Overview of strong winds on the coasts of the Russian Arctic seas ANNA A. SHESTAKOVA and IRINA A. REPINA Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics of Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia Correspondence author. E-mail: [email protected] Received 25 August 2019 │ Accepted by V. Pešić: 20 September 2019 │ Published online 8 November 2019. Abstract Joint analysis of ground-based standard observations, spaceborne Synthetic Aperture Radar observations and the Arctic System Reanalysis (ASR) v.2 allow us to identify areas with storm and hurricane wind in the Russian Arctic in detail. We analyzed statistics and genesis of strong winds in each region, with the special emphasis on orographic winds. For those regions where wind amplification occurs due to downslope windstorms (Novaya Zemlya, Svalbard, Tiksi, Pevek, Wrangel Island), a statistical analysis of the intensity and frequency of windstorms was carried out according to observations. Reanalysis ASR v.2 demonstrates significantly better strong wind climatology in comparison with another high-resolution Climate Forecast System Reanalysis. ASR v.2 still underestimates speed of strong winds, however it reproduces rather well most of mesoscale local winds, including Novaya Zemlya bora, Spitsbergen foehn, bora on Wrangel Island and some other. Key words: downslope windstorms, tip jets, ASR, orographic winds. Introduction According to criteria for hazard weather of Federal Service for Hydrometeorology and Environmental Monitoring (Roshydromet) (Federal ... 2009), a very strong (dangerous) wind on the coasts of the seas is a wind with 10-min averaged speed exceeding 30 m/s.
    [Show full text]
  • Folklore Fellows'
    Folklore Fellows’ NETWORK No . 48 July 2016 In Memoriam: Anna-Leena Siikala Linguistic Multiforms: Advancing Oral- Formulaic Theory Shaman or conman? Ways to frame cultural heritage after anti-religious propa- ganda www.folklorefellows.fi • www.folklorefellows.fi • www.folklorefellows.fi Folklore Fellows’ NETWORK FF Network 48 | July 2016 FF Network is a newsletter, published twice a year, related to FF Communications. It provides CONTENTS information on new FFC volumes and on articles related to cultural studies by internationally recognised authors. PEKKA HAKAMIES Change and Continuity 3 Publisher Fin nish Academy of Science and Letters, Helsinki Anna-Leena Siikala In Memoriam 4 Editor Pekka Hakamies FROG [email protected] Linguistic Multiforms: Advancing Oral-Formulaic Theory 6 Editorial secretary Petja Kauppi News from the Finnish Literature Society 12 [email protected] KARINA LUKIN Linguistic editor Shaman or con-man? Ways to frame cultural heritage Clive Tolley after anti-religious propaganda 15 Editorial office Kalevala Institute, University of Turku T. G. VLADYKINA AND A. YE. ZAGREBIN Folklore Archives of the Udmurt Institute of History, Address Language and Literature of the Russian Academy of Kalevala Institute, University of Turku Science 20014 Turku, Finland 21 Folklore Fellows on the internet http://www.folklorefellows.fi Printing Painosalama Oy, Turku ISSN-L 0789-0249 ISSN 0789-0249 (Print) ISSN 1798-3029 (Online) Subscriptions [email protected] Cover photo: Dr. Irina Nazmutdinova at the Folklore Archives of The Udmurt Institute of History, Language and Literature. Photo: Alexander Yegorov 2016. EDITORIAL NOTE PEKKA HAKAMIES Change and Continuity classic prayer asks for the strength to change have suffered two particular losses this year.
    [Show full text]
  • Permian Palynoevents in the Circum-Arctic Region
    Permian palynoevents in the circum-Arctic region Gunn Mangerud1*, Niall W. Paterson2 and Jonathan Bujak3 1. Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, Allégaten 41 N-5007, Bergen, Norway 2. CASP, West Building Madingley Rise, Cambridge CB3 0UD, UK 3. Bujak Research (International), 114 Abbotsford Road, Blackpool, Lancashire FY3 9RY, UK *Corresponding author: <[email protected]> Date received: 25 February 2020 ¶ Date accepted: 29 May 2020 ABSTRACT Permian palynofloras are recorded around the present-day Arctic and are typically dominated by taeniate and non-taeniate pollen, with intervals of spore domination. The assemblages show close similarities around the Arctic. Based on the published record, we present a compilation of 23 last occurrences (LOs), first occurrences (FOs), and some abundance events. These are anticipated to have regional correlation potential. In general, the Permian palynofloras of the Arctic have not been extensively studied, and the resolution is low due to a general lack of independent age control. RÉSUMÉ On observe à l’intérieur de la région arctique des palynoflores permiennes parmi lesquelles prédomine du pollen taeniforme et non taeniforme, avec des intervalles de domination de spores. Les assemblages présentent des similarités étroites à l’intérieur de l’Arctique. Nous basant sur la documentation publiée, nous présentons une compilation des 23 dernières occurrences (DO), des premières occurrences (PO) et de certains phénomènes d’abondance. Nous anticipons que ces phénomènes pourraient être corrélés à l’échelle régionale. De façon générale, les palynoflores permiennes de l’Arctique n’ont pas été considérablement étudiées et la résolution est faible en raison de l’absence générale de critères de datation indépendants.
    [Show full text]
  • Life in the Cyclic World: a Compendium of Traditional Knowledge from the Eurasian North Tero and Kaisu Mustonen Snowchange Cooperative, 2016 2
    1 Life in the Cyclic World: A Compendium of Traditional Knowledge from the Eurasian North Tero and Kaisu Mustonen Snowchange Cooperative, 2016 2 Cover: Traditional fish trap in Kolyma region, NE Siberia, late 1800s. Photo from the Jesup North Pacific Expedition, 1897-1902, published with the permission of Institute of the Indigenous Peoples, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2015. Jesup North Pacific Expedition was a major science expedition to the region over 100 years ago. The photos of the expedition have been shared with the Russian Academy of Sciences institutions, originating from the American Museum of Natural History, New York. Camps of the Chukchi and Yukaghir peoples in Kolyma region, NE Siberia, late 1800s. Photo from the Jesup North Pacific Expedition, 1897-1902, published with the permission of Institute of the Indigenous Peoples, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2015. 3 Camps of the Chukchi and Yukaghir peoples in Kolyma region, NE Siberia, late 1800s. Photo from the Jesup North Pacific Expedition, 1897-1902, published with the permission of Institute of the Indigenous Peoples, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2015. 4 Preface . 5 Part I. Introduction 8 I. Introduction to the Life in the Cyclic World . 8 1.1. A Need for a Dialogue with the Indigenous Homelands on Biodiversity . 8 1.2. Biodiversity – ”You Must Be In a Constant Contact With the Land” . 14 1.3. Positioning Traditional Ecological Knowledge . 16 1.4. Movement, Cycles and Adaptation to Changing Conditions . 23 2. Indigenous Governance of the Land . 26 2.1. Two Cases of Documented Indigenous Resource Management in the Take of Wild Animals in the Arctic .
    [Show full text]
  • The Arctic Travellers Guide
    The Arctic Travellers Guide The Canadian Arctic, Greenland, Iceland, Spitsbergen, The Russian Arctic and the North Pole The Latin America and Polar Travel Specialists WELCOME TO THE ARCTIC YOUR TRAVEL DOCUMENTATION At last your Arctic trip is about to begin. If you are reading this Travellers Guide it Being environmentally accountable is a crucial part of our organisation. We are means that you are about to set off on an incredible adventure. currently striving towards using less paper, taking several initiatives to do so and tracking our progress along the way. The Arctic is one of the world’s most extraordinary regions, famous for its incredible landscapes, uninhabited valleys and fascinating wildlife. Our goal - a paperless organisation. The Canadian Arctic offers some of the most dramatic glaciated landscapes on When taking into consideration gas emissions from paper production, transportation, the planet, as well as diverse wildlife and a rich Inuit culture plus access to the use and disposal, 98 tonnes of other resources are going in to making paper. Paper fabled Northwest Passage. Greenland showcases towering coastal cliffs lined and pulp production has been noted as the 4th largest industry contributor of with vast fjords and glaciers, waters strewn with imposing icebergs and isolated greenhouse gas emission in the world today and around 30 million acres of forest is Inuit communities. Spitsbergen is the land of the polar bear and the midnight sun, destroyed each year. As a way of giving back to the earth that makes who we are and the ‘wildlife capital of the Arctic’. Iceland, the ‘Land of Fire and Ice’ is overrun with what we do possible, we are highly dedicated to playing our part in minimising our stunning landscapes that encompass volcanoes, geysers, hot springs, lava fields, impact with our ‘paperless’ movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and Gas Industry Impact on Arctic Wetlands, Mitigation, Recovery and Restoration Options
    Oil and gas industry impact on Arctic wetlands, mitigation, recovery and restoration options FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY Final report of the project : «Shell Wetland International Partnership Study of Oil and Gas industry impact mitigation on Arctic Wetlands, wetands recovery and restoration» under the collaborative partnership between Shell and Wetlands International Project No:4600005499; Signed by Shell: 11/06/09; Signed by WI: 26/05/09 Wetlands International Ede 2011 Oil and gas industry impacts on Arctic wetlands: mitigation, recovery & restoration 2.3. Arctic wetlands and natural processes (Olivia Bragg, Vladimir Batuyev, Peter Kershaw, Alexander Kondratiev, Olga & Igor Lavrinenko, Tatiana Minayeva, Sergey Novikov, Marieke Oosterwoud, Saake van der Schaaf, Andrey Sirin, Ludmila Usova, Hok Woo, Kathy Young) 2.3.1. Arctic wetlands: classifying diversity Wetlands, as defined by the Ramsar Convention1, are widely represented in the Arctic (Fig. 2.2). The purpose of this review is to explain in the simplest possible way that different Arctic wetland types have different features and function in different ways. As a result, they provide different ecosystem services, they have different levels of sensitivity to disturbance, and different capacities for restoration. They are also subject to different legislation and decision-making mechanisms at national and international levels. The diversity of natural ecosystems is usually described in terms of a classification of some sort. Whatever classification principles are used, it seems that biodiversity scientists are never able to describe or predict all natural diversity in this way. Therefore, the common practice is to develop different classification schemes for different purposes. In this review, we use a very simple classification of wetlands to underpin the tasks of impact assessment and planning of mitigation and rehabilitation activities.
    [Show full text]