DOCSLIB.ORG

Akvaplan-Niva Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Akvaplan-Niva Report Seabirds contaminant data: Compilation and portraying of Norwegian and Russian data on contaminant levels in the ecosystems of the Barents, Pechora and White Sea. Seabirds. Report APN-414.4576 N-9296 Tromsø, Norway Tel. +47 77 75 03 00 Fax +47 77 75 03 01 Rapporttittel /Report title Seabirds contaminant data: Compilation and portraying of Norwegian and Russian data on contaminant levels in the ecosystems of the Barents, Pechora and White Sea. Forfatter(e) / Author(s) Akvaplan-niva rapport nr / report no: Vladimir Savinov, Akvaplan-niva, APN-414.4576 Tromsø, Norway Dato / Date: 135/05 2009 Antall sider / No. of pages 9 + CD Distribusjon / Distribution Open Oppdragsgiver / Client Oppdragsg. ref. / Client ref. NPI Geir Wing Gabrielsen Sammendrag / Summary The report presents compilation of Norwegian and Russian data on contaminant levels in seabirds from the Barents and Pechora Seas Emneord: Key words: Biota Biota Sjøfugl Seabirds Miljøgifter Environmental contaminants Barentshavet, Pechorasøen Barents Sea Prosjektleder / Project manager Kvalitetskontroll / Quality control Vladimir Savinov Lars-Henrik Larsen Vladimir Savinov Lars-Henrik Larsen © 2010 Akvaplan-niva ISBN 00-00-00000-0 Akvaplan-niva AS. Rapport APN-414.4576 Table of Content 1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 5 2 Goal of the project ............................................................................................................... 5 3 Results ................................................................................................................................. 5 4 References ........................................................................................................................... 8 4 Akvaplan-niva AS. Rapport APN-414.4576 1 Background The level of contaminants in the Barents region marine environment (biota and sediment) has been documented during the last decades both by Russian and Norwegian scientists. Lately, new compounds has been observed and documented in frame of national and international monitoring programmes. However, the documentation of contaminants trends is fragmented and somewhat difficult to follow. There exist limited compilation and presentation of existing contaminant data. 2 Goal of the project The main goal of this project is to compile Russian and Norwegian contaminants data on seabirds in a database and aggregate and visualise these data. The project will serve data for the Joint Russian – Norwegian Environmental Status Report of the Barents Sea (JRNESR) (HAV-I) and aggregate and portray data for the Joint Norwegian – Russian Environmental Data Portal (JNREDP) (HAV-11), including the portals metadatabase. 3 Results Desk-study and compilation of literature data (Barrett et al., 1985; 1996; Borgå et al., 2001; 2005; 2007; Gabrielsen, 1995; Gabrielsen et al., 1995; 2005; Helgason et al., 2008; Henriksen et al., 1996; 1998; 2000; Knudsen et al., 2005; 2006; 2007; Mehlum, Daelemans, 1995; Savinov et al., 2003; 2005; 2007; Savinova et al., 1995; 1998; 2000; Verreault et al., 2004; 2007a,b; Wenzel, Gabrielsen, 1995) on contamination levels in seabirds (trace elements in muscle, and persistent organic pollutants in hepatic tissues and eggs) were conducted for 17 seabird species: Arctic tern, black guillemot, Brünnich’s guillemot, common guillemot, common eider, king eider, cormorant, fulmar, glaucous gull, great black-backed gull, herring gull, kittiwake, little auk, long-tailed duck, puffin, razorbill, gannet, and shug from different areas of the Barents and Norwegian Seas (Figure 1). Coordinates of sampling sites are presented in Table 1. 5 Akvaplan-niva AS. Rapport APN-414.4576 Franz Josef Land Svalbard Novaya Zemlya Bear Island B A R E N T S S E A Vaygach Island NORWEGIAN SEA PECHORA SEA Dolgyi Island NORWAY Kolguyev Island Seven Islands RUSSIA Figure 1. Sites of seabird sampling in 1983-2002. Table 1. Coordinates of seabird sampling sites Area Site Latitude Longitude N-Barents Sea Marginal zone95 77º02'N 34º04'E N-Barents Sea Marginal zone99 76º30'N 33º00'N Eastern Murman coast Podpakhta 69º09' N 35º56' E Finnmark Hjelmsøy 71º 05'N 24º45'E Franz Josef Land Archipelago Etheridge Island 80º05' N 52º23' E Franz Josef Land Archipelago Hooker Island 80º18' N 53º00' E Franz Josef Land Archipelago George Land Island 80º10' N 49º15' E Franz Josef Land Archipelago Kuhn Island 81º08' N 58º30' E Franz Josef Land Archipelago Mable Island 80º03' N 49º30' E Franz Josef Land Archipelago Northbrook Island 80º00' N 51º00' E Franz Josef Land Archipelago Scott-Kelty Island 80º20' N 52º30' E Franz Josef Land Archipelago Stolichky Island 81º12' N 58º16' E Lofoten Islands Røst 67º31.20'N 12º06'E Novaya Zemlya Archipelago Chernaya 70º40' N 54º46' E Pechora Sea Dolgiy Island 69º18' N 59º00' E Pechora Sea Kolguyev Island 69º06' N 50º06' E Pechora Sea Vaygach Island 70º24' N 58º46' E S-E of the Norwegian Sea (Troms) Hillesøy 69º38' N 17º59' E S-E of the Norwegian Sea (Troms) Sommarøy 69º38' N 18º02' E S-E of the Norwegian Sea (Troms) Bleiksøy 69º16'N 15º52'E S-E of the Norwegian Sea (Troms) Hekkingen 69º35,43'N 17º50,5'E Seven Islands Archipelago Kharlov Island 68º49' N 37º20' E Seven Islands Archipelago Kuvshin Island 68º44' N 37º32' E 6 Akvaplan-niva AS. Rapport APN-414.4576 Area Site Latitude Longitude Svalbard Archipelago Bjørnøya 74º22' N 19º05' E Svalbard Archipelago Ny-Ålesund 78º57' N 11º54' E Svalbard Archipelago Longyerbyen 78º13'N 15º37'60 Svalbard Archipelago Barentsburg 78º04N 14º13.6 Svalbard Archipelago Bjørnøya area 74º02'N 19º01'E Svalbard Archipelago Bjørnøya, Russehamna 74º23'N 19º10'E Svalbard Archipelago Kongsfjord 78º55'N 12º30'E Svalbard Archipelago Nordaustlandet 79º48.6'N 20º54'E Svalbard Archipelago Storfjorden 77º30'N 20º00'E S-W of the Barents Sea Ainov Island 69º50' N 31º34' E S-W of the Barents Sea Hornøya 70º22' N 31º10' E Data files and maps of geographical distribution of contamination levels in seabirds were prepared for following contaminants/seabird species/tissues/: Trace elements (cadmium, zinc, cooper, manganese, chromium, arsenic, selenium and mercury) in muscle tissue of arctic tern, black guillemot, Brünnich’s guillemot, common guillemot, common eider, king eider, fulmar, glaucous gull, great black-backed gull, herring gull, kittiwake, little auk, long-tailed duck, cormorant, puffin and razorbill (Appendix 1, CD). Organochlorines (hexachlorocyclohexanes (HCHs): ΣHCH = sum of α-, β- and γ-HCH; dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT): ΣDDT = sum of p,p’-DDE, o,p’-DDD, p,p’-DDD, o,p’- DDT and p,p’-DDT, hexachlorobenzene (HCB), chlordanes (CHL): ΣCHL = sum of oxychlordane, trans-chlordane, cis-chlordane, trans-nonachlor and cis-nonachlor and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs): ΣPCB= sum of PCB-28, 66, 74, 101, 99, 110, 149, 118, 153, 105, 141, 138, 187, 128, 156, 157, 180, 170, 194, 206 and 209) in liver of arctic tern, black guillemot, Brünnich’s guillemot, common guillemot, common eider, king eider, fulmar, glaucous gull, great black-backed gull, herring gull, kittiwake, little auk, long-tailed duck, cormorant, puffin and razorbill (Appendix 2, CD). Persistent organic pollutants (hexachlorocyclohexanes (HCHs): ΣHCH= sum of α-, β- and γ- HCH; dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT): ΣDDT = sum of p,p’-DDE, o,p’-DDD, p,p’- DDD, o,p’-DDT and p,p’-DDT, hexachlorobenzene (HCB), chlordanes (CHL): ΣCHL = sum of oxychlordane, trans-chlordane, cis-chlordane, trans-nonachlor and cis-nonachlor and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs): ΣPCB= sum of PCB-28, 66, 74, 101, 99, 110, 149, 118, 153, 105, 141, 138, 187, 128, 156, 157, 180, 170, 194, 206 and 209; polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs): ΣPBDE = sum of BDE-28, 47, 100, 99, 154, 153, 183, 206, 207, 208 and 209; hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD): HBCD = sum of α-, β- and γ-HBCDD; perfluorinated surfactans (PFSs): Σ4PFS = sum of PFBS, PFHxS, PFOS and PFDcS and perfluorinated 7 Akvaplan-niva AS. Rapport APN-414.4576 carboxylic acids (PFCAs):Σ10PFCA = sum of ten PFCAs with chain-lenghts between six and fifteen carbons.) in eggs of Brünnich’s guillemot, common guillemot, common eider, glaucous gull, herring gull, kittiwake, cormorant, puffin, razorbill shag and gannet (Appendix 3, CD). 4 References Barrett, R.T., Skaare, J.U., Norheim, G., Vader, W. & Frøslie, A. 1985. Persistent organochlorines and mercury in eggs of Norwegian seabirds 1983. Environ. Poll. (Ser. A), 39:79-93. Barrett, R.T., J.U. Skaare & G.W. Gabrielsen. 1996. Recent changes in levels of persistent organochlorines and mercury in eggs of seabirds from the Barents Sea. Environ. Poll. 92: 13-18. Borgå, K., G.W. Gabrielsen & J.U. Skaare. 2001. Biomagnification of organochlorines along a Barents Sea food chain. Environ. Poll. 113:187-198. Borgå, K., Walkers, H., Skaare, J.U., Hop, H., Muir, D.C.G. & G.W. Gabrielsen. 2005. Bioaccumulation of PCBs in Arctic seabirds: influence of dietary exposure and congener biotransformation. Environ. Poll. 134: 397-409 Borgå, K., Hop, H, Skaare, J.U., Wolkers, H. & G.W. Gabrielsen. 2007. Selective bioaccumulation of chlorinated pesticides and metabolites in Arctic seabirds. Environ. Poll. 145:545-553 Gabrielsen, G.W., Skaare, J.U., Polder., A., Bakken, V. 1995. Chlorinated hydrocarbons in glaucous gulls (Larus hyperboreus) in the southern part of Svalbard. Sci. Tot. Environ. 160/161:337-346. Gabrielsen, G.W., L.B. Knudsen and M. Schlabach. 2005. Organic pollutants in northern fulmars (Fulmarus glacialis) from Bjørnøya. Report to the Norwegian Pollution Control Authority
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure- Present State And
    Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure – Present State and Future Potential By Claes Lykke Ragner FNI Report 13/2000 FRIDTJOF NANSENS INSTITUTT THE FRIDTJOF NANSEN INSTITUTE Tittel/Title Sider/Pages Northern Sea Route Cargo Flows and Infrastructure – Present 124 State and Future Potential Publikasjonstype/Publication Type Nummer/Number FNI Report 13/2000 Forfatter(e)/Author(s) ISBN Claes Lykke Ragner 82-7613-400-9 Program/Programme ISSN 0801-2431 Prosjekt/Project Sammendrag/Abstract The report assesses the Northern Sea Route’s commercial potential and economic importance, both as a transit route between Europe and Asia, and as an export route for oil, gas and other natural resources in the Russian Arctic. First, it conducts a survey of past and present Northern Sea Route (NSR) cargo flows. Then follow discussions of the route’s commercial potential as a transit route, as well as of its economic importance and relevance for each of the Russian Arctic regions. These discussions are summarized by estimates of what types and volumes of NSR cargoes that can realistically be expected in the period 2000-2015. This is then followed by a survey of the status quo of the NSR infrastructure (above all the ice-breakers, ice-class cargo vessels and ports), with estimates of its future capacity. Based on the estimated future NSR cargo potential, future NSR infrastructure requirements are calculated and compared with the estimated capacity in order to identify the main, future infrastructure bottlenecks for NSR operations. The information presented in the report is mainly compiled from data and research results that were published through the International Northern Sea Route Programme (INSROP) 1993-99, but considerable updates have been made using recent information, statistics and analyses from various sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite Ice Extent, Sea Surface Temperature, and Atmospheric 2 Methane Trends in the Barents and Kara Seas
    The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2018-237 Manuscript under review for journal The Cryosphere Discussion started: 22 November 2018 c Author(s) 2018. CC BY 4.0 License. 1 Satellite ice extent, sea surface temperature, and atmospheric 2 methane trends in the Barents and Kara Seas 1 2 3 2 4 3 Ira Leifer , F. Robert Chen , Thomas McClimans , Frank Muller Karger , Leonid Yurganov 1 4 Bubbleology Research International, Inc., Solvang, CA, USA 2 5 University of Southern Florida, USA 3 6 SINTEF Ocean, Trondheim, Norway 4 7 University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA 8 Correspondence to: Ira Leifer ([email protected]) 9 10 Abstract. Over a decade (2003-2015) of satellite data of sea-ice extent, sea surface temperature (SST), and methane 11 (CH4) concentrations in lower troposphere over 10 focus areas within the Barents and Kara Seas (BKS) were 12 analyzed for anomalies and trends relative to the Barents Sea. Large positive CH4 anomalies were discovered around 13 Franz Josef Land (FJL) and offshore west Novaya Zemlya in early fall. Far smaller CH4 enhancement was found 14 around Svalbard, downstream and north of known seabed seepage. SST increased in all focus areas at rates from 15 0.0018 to 0.15 °C yr-1, CH4 growth spanned 3.06 to 3.49 ppb yr-1. 16 The strongest SST increase was observed each year in the southeast Barents Sea in June due to strengthening of 17 the warm Murman Current (MC), and in the south Kara Sea in September. The southeast Barents Sea, the south 18 Kara Sea and coastal areas around FJL exhibited the strongest CH4 growth over the observation period.
    [Show full text]
  • Expedition Project “Arctic Floating University -2018” «Terrae Novae»
    Expedition Project “Arctic Floating University -2018” «Terrae Novae» Expedition Dates: July 21- August 9, 2017 Expedition Duration: 20 days Expedition Organizers: Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov; Roshydromet. Expedition Route: Arkhangelsk – Russkaya Gavan' Bay (Novaya Zemlya) – Malye Oransky Islands – Zhelaniya Cape – Murmantsa Bay (Gemskerka Island)– Ledenaya Gavan` Bay – Middendorfa Cape – Noviy Bay – Shubert Bay – Litke Bay – Kurochkina Cape – Menshikov Cape – Varnek (Vaigach Island) – Bugrino (Kolguyev Island) – Solovetsky Islands – Arkhangelsk. Expedition participants: 58 people (students, post-graduate students, research fellows of both Russian and foreign scientific and academic institutions) Partners participating in the expedition: Russian Geographical Society, Russian Arctic National Park, Lomonosov Moscow State University, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Federal Polytechnic School of Lausanne. Aims of the expedition: acquiring new knowledge about the state and changes in the ecosystem of the coastal areas of Novaya Zemlya archipelago; training of young specialists of the Arctic-focused specialties: hydrometeorology, ecology, arctic biology, geography, ethnopolitology, international law etc.; development of scientific and educational cooperation with the Arctic Council countries in the framework of the high-latitude Arctic expeditions; popularization of the Russian scientific, historical, cultural and natural heritage and polar specialties among the youth, development of patriotism
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns and Drivers of Megabenthic Secondary Production on the Barents Sea Shelf
    Vol. 546: 1–16, 2016 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published March 21 doi: 10.3354/meps11662 Mar Ecol Prog Ser OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS FEATURE ARTICLE Patterns and drivers of megabenthic secondary production on the Barents Sea shelf Renate Degen1,*, Lis Lindal Jørgensen2, Pavel Ljubin3, Ingrid H. Ellingsen4, Hendrik Pehlke1, Thomas Brey1 1Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany 2Institute of Marine Research, 9294 Tromsø, Norway 3Polar Research Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography, 183038 Murmansk, Russia 4SINTEF Fisheries and Aquaculture, Brattørkaia 17C, 7010 Trondheim, Norway ABSTRACT: Megabenthos plays a major role in the overall energy flow on Arctic shelves, but information on megabenthic secondary production on large spatial scales is scarce. Here, we estimated for the first time megabenthic secondary production for the entire Bar- ents Sea shelf by applying a species-based empirical model to an extensive dataset from the joint Norwe- gian−Russian ecosystem survey. Spatial patterns and relationships were analyzed within a GIS. The environ- mental drivers behind the observed production pattern were identified by applying an ordinary least squares regression model. Geographically weighted regression (GWR) was used to examine the varying relationship of secondary production and the environment on a shelf- wide scale. Significantly higher megabenthic second- ary production was found in the northeastern, season- ally ice-covered regions of the Barents Sea than in the permanently ice-free southwest. The environmental parameters that significantly relate to the observed pat- tern are bottom temperature and salinity, sea ice cover, new primary production, trawling pressure, and bottom current speed.
    [Show full text]
  • Barents Protected Area Network Recommendations for Strengthening the Protected Area Network in the Barents Region
    BPAN POLICY BRIEF | WWW.bpan.FI | 5.12.2013 Barents Protected Area Network Recommendations for Strengthening the Protected Area Network in the Barents Region There is a need for prompt establishment of planned protected areas and conservation of the last intact forests. • In February 2010 in Tromsø, Norway, the Barents environment ministers urged further steps to protect the last intact boreal forests and underlined the importance of identifying and establishing a representative network of protected areas in the Barents Region (BPAN). The importance of BPAN was further confirmed in November 2013 by the chair of the Barents Euro-Arctic Council. • The countries of the Barents Euro-Arctic Region have a special responsibility to conserve biodiversity, since the valuable ecosystems of the region represent natural heritage of global significance. In addition, its intact forest, mire and tundra ecosystems are enermous carbon stores. • The most significant threats to biodiversity in the Barents Region are habitat loss, degradation and fragmentation, as well as rapidly changing climate. Increasing and too often unsustainable use of natural resources creates a serious threat to natural environment and ecosystems. An ecologically functioning and well connected protected area network serves - even by itself - as an effective tool for biodiversity conservation and also mitigates the impacts of climate change and helps the nature and people in adaptation to changing environmental conditions. 10°E 20°E 30°E 40°E 50°E 60°E 70°E 70°N a CLASS OF PROTECTION y Strong protection Planned protected area All ThE BPAN piloT l m Medium level protection BPAN Pilot sites sites are hIgh e KARA Weak protection Border of the Barents Region Z CoNservatioN vAluE a areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Strong Winds on the Coasts of the Russian Arctic Seas
    Ecologica Montenegrina 25: 14-25 (2019) This journal is available online at: www.biotaxa.org/em Overview of strong winds on the coasts of the Russian Arctic seas ANNA A. SHESTAKOVA and IRINA A. REPINA Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics of Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia Correspondence author. E-mail: [email protected] Received 25 August 2019 │ Accepted by V. Pešić: 20 September 2019 │ Published online 8 November 2019. Abstract Joint analysis of ground-based standard observations, spaceborne Synthetic Aperture Radar observations and the Arctic System Reanalysis (ASR) v.2 allow us to identify areas with storm and hurricane wind in the Russian Arctic in detail. We analyzed statistics and genesis of strong winds in each region, with the special emphasis on orographic winds. For those regions where wind amplification occurs due to downslope windstorms (Novaya Zemlya, Svalbard, Tiksi, Pevek, Wrangel Island), a statistical analysis of the intensity and frequency of windstorms was carried out according to observations. Reanalysis ASR v.2 demonstrates significantly better strong wind climatology in comparison with another high-resolution Climate Forecast System Reanalysis. ASR v.2 still underestimates speed of strong winds, however it reproduces rather well most of mesoscale local winds, including Novaya Zemlya bora, Spitsbergen foehn, bora on Wrangel Island and some other. Key words: downslope windstorms, tip jets, ASR, orographic winds. Introduction According to criteria for hazard weather of Federal Service for Hydrometeorology and Environmental Monitoring (Roshydromet) (Federal ... 2009), a very strong (dangerous) wind on the coasts of the seas is a wind with 10-min averaged speed exceeding 30 m/s.
    [Show full text]
  • Folklore Fellows'
    Folklore Fellows’ NETWORK No . 48 July 2016 In Memoriam: Anna-Leena Siikala Linguistic Multiforms: Advancing Oral- Formulaic Theory Shaman or conman? Ways to frame cultural heritage after anti-religious propa- ganda www.folklorefellows.fi • www.folklorefellows.fi • www.folklorefellows.fi Folklore Fellows’ NETWORK FF Network 48 | July 2016 FF Network is a newsletter, published twice a year, related to FF Communications. It provides CONTENTS information on new FFC volumes and on articles related to cultural studies by internationally recognised authors. PEKKA HAKAMIES Change and Continuity 3 Publisher Fin nish Academy of Science and Letters, Helsinki Anna-Leena Siikala In Memoriam 4 Editor Pekka Hakamies FROG [email protected] Linguistic Multiforms: Advancing Oral-Formulaic Theory 6 Editorial secretary Petja Kauppi News from the Finnish Literature Society 12 [email protected] KARINA LUKIN Linguistic editor Shaman or con-man? Ways to frame cultural heritage Clive Tolley after anti-religious propaganda 15 Editorial office Kalevala Institute, University of Turku T. G. VLADYKINA AND A. YE. ZAGREBIN Folklore Archives of the Udmurt Institute of History, Address Language and Literature of the Russian Academy of Kalevala Institute, University of Turku Science 20014 Turku, Finland 21 Folklore Fellows on the internet http://www.folklorefellows.fi Printing Painosalama Oy, Turku ISSN-L 0789-0249 ISSN 0789-0249 (Print) ISSN 1798-3029 (Online) Subscriptions [email protected] Cover photo: Dr. Irina Nazmutdinova at the Folklore Archives of The Udmurt Institute of History, Language and Literature. Photo: Alexander Yegorov 2016. EDITORIAL NOTE PEKKA HAKAMIES Change and Continuity classic prayer asks for the strength to change have suffered two particular losses this year.
    [Show full text]
  • Permian Palynoevents in the Circum-Arctic Region
    Permian palynoevents in the circum-Arctic region Gunn Mangerud1*, Niall W. Paterson2 and Jonathan Bujak3 1. Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, Allégaten 41 N-5007, Bergen, Norway 2. CASP, West Building Madingley Rise, Cambridge CB3 0UD, UK 3. Bujak Research (International), 114 Abbotsford Road, Blackpool, Lancashire FY3 9RY, UK *Corresponding author: <[email protected]> Date received: 25 February 2020 ¶ Date accepted: 29 May 2020 ABSTRACT Permian palynofloras are recorded around the present-day Arctic and are typically dominated by taeniate and non-taeniate pollen, with intervals of spore domination. The assemblages show close similarities around the Arctic. Based on the published record, we present a compilation of 23 last occurrences (LOs), first occurrences (FOs), and some abundance events. These are anticipated to have regional correlation potential. In general, the Permian palynofloras of the Arctic have not been extensively studied, and the resolution is low due to a general lack of independent age control. RÉSUMÉ On observe à l’intérieur de la région arctique des palynoflores permiennes parmi lesquelles prédomine du pollen taeniforme et non taeniforme, avec des intervalles de domination de spores. Les assemblages présentent des similarités étroites à l’intérieur de l’Arctique. Nous basant sur la documentation publiée, nous présentons une compilation des 23 dernières occurrences (DO), des premières occurrences (PO) et de certains phénomènes d’abondance. Nous anticipons que ces phénomènes pourraient être corrélés à l’échelle régionale. De façon générale, les palynoflores permiennes de l’Arctique n’ont pas été considérablement étudiées et la résolution est faible en raison de l’absence générale de critères de datation indépendants.
    [Show full text]
  • Barents Protected Area Network Recommendations for Strengthening the Protected Area Network in the Barents Region
    BPAN POLICY BRIEF | WWW.BPAN.FI | 5.12.2013 Barents Protected Area Network Recommendations for Strengthening the Protected Area Network in the Barents Region There is a need for prompt establishment of planned protected areas and conservation of the last intact forests. • In February 2010 in Tromsø, Norway, the Barents environment ministers urged further steps to protect the last intact boreal forests and underlined the importance of identifying and establishing a representative network of protected areas in the Barents Region (BPAN). The importance of BPAN was further confirmed in November 2013 by the chair of the Barents Euro-Arctic Council. • The countries of the Barents Euro-Arctic Region have a special responsibility to conserve biodiversity, since the valuable ecosystems of the region represent natural heritage of global significance. In addition, its intact forest, mire and tundra ecosystems are enermous carbon stores. • The most significant threats to biodiversity in the Barents Region are habitat loss, degradation and fragmentation, as well as rapidly changing climate. Increasing and too often unsustainable use of natural resources creates a serious threat to natural environment and ecosystems. An ecologically functioning and well connected protected area network serves - even by itself - as an effective tool for biodiversity conservation and also mitigates the impacts of climate change and helps the nature and people in adaptation to changing environmental conditions. 10°E 20°E 30°E 40°E 50°E 60°E 70°E 70°N a CLASS OF PROTECTION y Strong protection Planned protected area ALL THE BPAN PILOT l m Medium level protection BPAN Pilot sites SITES ARE HIGH e KARA Weak protection Border of the Barents Region Z CONSERVATION VALUE a AREAS.
    [Show full text]
  • Life in the Cyclic World: a Compendium of Traditional Knowledge from the Eurasian North Tero and Kaisu Mustonen Snowchange Cooperative, 2016 2
    1 Life in the Cyclic World: A Compendium of Traditional Knowledge from the Eurasian North Tero and Kaisu Mustonen Snowchange Cooperative, 2016 2 Cover: Traditional fish trap in Kolyma region, NE Siberia, late 1800s. Photo from the Jesup North Pacific Expedition, 1897-1902, published with the permission of Institute of the Indigenous Peoples, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2015. Jesup North Pacific Expedition was a major science expedition to the region over 100 years ago. The photos of the expedition have been shared with the Russian Academy of Sciences institutions, originating from the American Museum of Natural History, New York. Camps of the Chukchi and Yukaghir peoples in Kolyma region, NE Siberia, late 1800s. Photo from the Jesup North Pacific Expedition, 1897-1902, published with the permission of Institute of the Indigenous Peoples, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2015. 3 Camps of the Chukchi and Yukaghir peoples in Kolyma region, NE Siberia, late 1800s. Photo from the Jesup North Pacific Expedition, 1897-1902, published with the permission of Institute of the Indigenous Peoples, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2015. 4 Preface . 5 Part I. Introduction 8 I. Introduction to the Life in the Cyclic World . 8 1.1. A Need for a Dialogue with the Indigenous Homelands on Biodiversity . 8 1.2. Biodiversity – ”You Must Be In a Constant Contact With the Land” . 14 1.3. Positioning Traditional Ecological Knowledge . 16 1.4. Movement, Cycles and Adaptation to Changing Conditions . 23 2. Indigenous Governance of the Land . 26 2.1. Two Cases of Documented Indigenous Resource Management in the Take of Wild Animals in the Arctic .
    [Show full text]
  • The Arctic Travellers Guide
    The Arctic Travellers Guide The Canadian Arctic, Greenland, Iceland, Spitsbergen, The Russian Arctic and the North Pole The Latin America and Polar Travel Specialists WELCOME TO THE ARCTIC YOUR TRAVEL DOCUMENTATION At last your Arctic trip is about to begin. If you are reading this Travellers Guide it Being environmentally accountable is a crucial part of our organisation. We are means that you are about to set off on an incredible adventure. currently striving towards using less paper, taking several initiatives to do so and tracking our progress along the way. The Arctic is one of the world’s most extraordinary regions, famous for its incredible landscapes, uninhabited valleys and fascinating wildlife. Our goal - a paperless organisation. The Canadian Arctic offers some of the most dramatic glaciated landscapes on When taking into consideration gas emissions from paper production, transportation, the planet, as well as diverse wildlife and a rich Inuit culture plus access to the use and disposal, 98 tonnes of other resources are going in to making paper. Paper fabled Northwest Passage. Greenland showcases towering coastal cliffs lined and pulp production has been noted as the 4th largest industry contributor of with vast fjords and glaciers, waters strewn with imposing icebergs and isolated greenhouse gas emission in the world today and around 30 million acres of forest is Inuit communities. Spitsbergen is the land of the polar bear and the midnight sun, destroyed each year. As a way of giving back to the earth that makes who we are and the ‘wildlife capital of the Arctic’. Iceland, the ‘Land of Fire and Ice’ is overrun with what we do possible, we are highly dedicated to playing our part in minimising our stunning landscapes that encompass volcanoes, geysers, hot springs, lava fields, impact with our ‘paperless’ movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and Gas Industry Impact on Arctic Wetlands, Mitigation, Recovery and Restoration Options
    Oil and gas industry impact on Arctic wetlands, mitigation, recovery and restoration options FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY Final report of the project : «Shell Wetland International Partnership Study of Oil and Gas industry impact mitigation on Arctic Wetlands, wetands recovery and restoration» under the collaborative partnership between Shell and Wetlands International Project No:4600005499; Signed by Shell: 11/06/09; Signed by WI: 26/05/09 Wetlands International Ede 2011 Oil and gas industry impacts on Arctic wetlands: mitigation, recovery & restoration 2.3. Arctic wetlands and natural processes (Olivia Bragg, Vladimir Batuyev, Peter Kershaw, Alexander Kondratiev, Olga & Igor Lavrinenko, Tatiana Minayeva, Sergey Novikov, Marieke Oosterwoud, Saake van der Schaaf, Andrey Sirin, Ludmila Usova, Hok Woo, Kathy Young) 2.3.1. Arctic wetlands: classifying diversity Wetlands, as defined by the Ramsar Convention1, are widely represented in the Arctic (Fig. 2.2). The purpose of this review is to explain in the simplest possible way that different Arctic wetland types have different features and function in different ways. As a result, they provide different ecosystem services, they have different levels of sensitivity to disturbance, and different capacities for restoration. They are also subject to different legislation and decision-making mechanisms at national and international levels. The diversity of natural ecosystems is usually described in terms of a classification of some sort. Whatever classification principles are used, it seems that biodiversity scientists are never able to describe or predict all natural diversity in this way. Therefore, the common practice is to develop different classification schemes for different purposes. In this review, we use a very simple classification of wetlands to underpin the tasks of impact assessment and planning of mitigation and rehabilitation activities.
    [Show full text]