DOCSLIB.ORG

AALCO Asian-African Legal Consultative Organization Fifty-Second Annual Session 9 to 12 September 2013 Headquarters, New Delhi, India

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AALCO Asian-African Legal Consultative Organization Fifty-Second Annual Session 9 to 12 September 2013 Headquarters, New Delhi, India AALCO Asian-African Legal Consultative Organization Fifty-Second Annual Session 9 to 12 September 2013 Headquarters, New Delhi, India SUMMARY REPORT OF THE FIFTY-SECOND ANNUAL SESSION OF THE ASIAN-AFRICAN LEGAL CONSULTATIVE ORGANIZATION 1. Introduction 1.1 36 Member States of the Asian-African Legal Consultative Organization (the AALCO) participated in the Fifty-Second Annual Session (hereinafter "the Session") namely, Arab Republic of Egypt, Bangladesh, Brunei Darussalam, People's Republic of China, Republic of Cyprus, Ghana, Republic of India, Republic of Indonesia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Japan, Kenya, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Republic of Korea, State of Kuwait, Libya, Malaysia, Mauritius, The Republic of the Union of Myanmar, Nepal, Federal Republic of Nigeria, Sultanate of Oman, Pakistan, State of Palestine, State of Qatar, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Republic of South Africa, Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syria, United Republic of Tanzania, Thailand, Turkey, Uganda, United Arab Emirates and Republic of Yemen. 1.2 Representatives of the following Regional Arbitration Centres of AALCO were also present: Kuala Lumpur Regional Centre for Arbitration (KLRCA), and Regional Arbitration Centre for International Commercial Arbitration, Lagos (RCICAL). 1.3 In accordance with Rule 18 (1) of the Statutory Rules, the following Observers were admitted to the Session: (i) Representatives from the following Non-Member States: Islamic Republic of 1 Afghanistan, Republic of Fiji and Republic of Madagascar; (ii) Representatives of the following International Organizations: African-Asian Rural Development Organization (AARDO); United Nations Office for Drugs and Crime (UNODC); United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) and International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). 2. Inaugural Session 2.1 The Session commenced on 9 September 2013 with the Master of Ceremonies welcoming all the Delegations to New Delhi, the Headquarters of AALCO, for the Fifty- Second Annual Session. 2.2 His Excellency Prof. Dr. Rahmat Mohamad, Secretary-General of the Asian-African Legal Consultative Organization (AALCO) welcomed all the delegates and attendees. He further welcomed His Excellency Mr. E. Ahamed, the Minister of State for External Affairs, Government of India and thanked him for sparing his valuable time amidst his busy schedule. It was stated that his presence reassured AALCO of India’s prominent role in the development and continued support for the Organization since its foundation in 1956. It was pointed out that the presence of such a large number of Ministers and Attorney Generals heading the delegations signified that AALCO was important to them and he thanked them all for their gracious presence. He then stated that the Government of India has always been a generous host of AALCO by providing it with the Permanent Headquarters in the prestigious Diplomatic Enclave in Delhi and rendering financial assistance in times of need. He then recalled that this was the fourth Headquarters Annual Session that was being conducted by the AALCO Secretariat at New Delhi and stated that the government of India has always rendered all possible assistance for the smooth conduct of these Sessions and for this he stated that the Organization owed a special thanks to the Government of India. 2.3 Prof. Dr. Mohamad then stated that the AALCO Statutes envisaged the conduct of the Headquarters Session only in the event of none of the Member States coming forth to host the same and he pointed out that this option was to be exercised only as a matter of last resort considering the huge financial burden on the Organization in addition to the strain on the logistics and manpower resources. 2.4 Prof. Dr. Mohamad pointed out that the year 2013 marked the completion of 57 years since the establishment of AALCO and recalled the important contributions made by the Organization. He asserted the continuing relevance of the Organization in the context of several of its Member States being threatened with impending attack by powerful nations without following the due process of law. He then pointed out that these situations pointed towards the basic questions concerning the nature of international law and how far states adhere to it. He then referred to the gradual growth in the membership of the Organization from seven to forty-seven over the years and the important position that the Organization occupies in the international legal community. He then highlighted the diverse functions undertaken by AALCO over the years and the role it plays in assisting 2 the preparation of the Asian-African Countries for the Plenipotentiaries Conferences, convened to codify and develop international law. At this juncture he recalled the contributions of the Organization towards the development of the law of Sea, Convention on Diplomatic Relations and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court etc. Recalling the other diverse roles played by the Organization in the codification and progressive development of international law, he pointed out the need to ensure that the Organization remains on a strong ideological foundation and enjoys firm financial support. He then briefly listed the topics earmarked for deliberations and the two half day special meetings. 2.5 Hon’ble Mohammed Bello Adoke SAN, Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Federal Republic of Nigeria and President of the Fifty-First Annual Session of AALCO welcomed all the delegates and delivered the keynote Address at the Session. On behalf of his delegation, he expressed his profound gratitude to His Excellency Prof. Dr. Rahmat Mohamad, the Secretary-General of AALCO and the AALCO Secretariat for extending a very warm welcome and hospitality and for the excellent arrangements made to ensure a successful Session. Particularly, he commended the Secretary-General and the Secretariat for the preparation of the documents relating to the Annual Session. 2.6 He extended his sincere gratitude to the honourable Ministers, Heads of Delegations, Distinguished Delegates and Observes and the Panelists for the two Half-Day’s Special Meetings. The President gave an overview of the topics for deliberation during the Annual Session and stated that they were of immense significance for the Member States of AALCO and other developing countries. These included the agenda items like Environment and Sustainable Development, Law of the Sea, Challenges in Combating Corruption, International Law Commission, Statehood of Palestine and Extra-territorial application of national legislation. 2.7 It was recalled that since its inception in 1956 post-Bandung Conference, which brought together the then newly independent states of Asia and Africa on a common footing, AALCO has come a long way. AALCO had received an important position among international legal community with increased membership and for its ‘insightful prism’ on legal issues. In relation to the work of the International Law Commission (ILC), as a member of the pre-eminent body vested with the codification and progressive development of international law, he attested the work of ILC and its contributions particularly to the Asian and African States. He stated that ILC was a forum composing members from these States, which could articulate their views & concerns, in relation to the topics on the agenda of the ILC, and became very important in the law-making process. In that regard, he stated that the contribution of Special Rapporteurs of the ILC in channelling the views of Asian-African States in compiling the views in their Reports and draft articles, were very commendable. The AALCO having been statutorily mandated to follow the work of the ILC contributes by transmitting the views of its Member States to the Commission. 2.8 Emphasizing on the significant role of Secretary-General in steering the activities of AALCO, the President informed the Member States about the initiatives of the Secretary- 3 General in convening the Annual Meeting of the Legal Advisors of the Member States of AALCO at the UN Headquarters at New York. He also congratulated Dr. Roy Lee, Permanent Observer of AALCO to the United Nations, New York for the arrangements at the Legal Adviser’s Meeting. The determination and shared commitment of AALCO Member States, during the meeting, despite the hurricane Sandy was very appreciable. He recalled the meeting with the Secretary-General at the Eleventh Session of the Assembly of States Parties to the International Criminal Court (ICC) in November 2012 at The Hague, Netherlands, where he delivered an important Statement clearly highlighting the concerns of the Asian-African states in relation to the work of the ICC. 2.9 The President acknowledged the increased activities of AALCO in the form of seminars/training programmes on a number of areas of critical concern to its Member States and commended the untiring efforts and commitment of the Secretary-General in conceptualizing and executing those programmes, despite the financial constraints. He referred to the Seminar on Climate Change and the Legal Experts Meeting to commemorate the 30th Anniversary of UNCLOS, which were convened by the AALCO Secretariat. As the President of the Fifty-First Annual Session of AALCO, he urged the Member States of AALCO who were in arrears to pay their assessed contributions within a reasonable period for facilitating AALCO to be on a sound financial footing. He wished the session very fruitful discussions. 2.10 The Chief Guest, Hon. Shri. E. Ahamed, Minister of State for External Affairs, Government of India, delivered the inaugural address. Mr. Ahamed welcomed the delegates and the attendees present on behalf of himself and the Government of India. 2.11 He stated that International Law no longer governed just the relations between States but that in the face of rapid globalization it was now encompassing territories that were once considered to be in the domain of the domestic laws. It was stated that there were no longer any domains of national interest untouched by international law.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 7 September 2011
    United Nations A/66/342 General Assembly Distr.: General 7 September 2011 Original: English Sixty-sixth session Item 69 (b) of the provisional agenda* Promotion and protection of human rights: human rights questions, including alternative approaches for improving the effective enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms Programme of activities for the International Year for People of African Descent Report of the Secretary-General Summary The present report is submitted pursuant to General Assembly resolution 65/36 and focuses on the programme of activities to mark the International Year for People of African Descent. * A/66/150. 11-48857 (E) 160911 *1148857* A/66/342 Contents Page I. Introduction ................................................................... 3 II. Implementation of resolution 65/36 ................................................ 3 III. Contributions received .......................................................... 4 A. Member States............................................................. 4 B. United Nations bodies....................................................... 12 C. Regional and other intergovernmental organizations .............................. 17 D. National human rights institutions and other independent bodies.................... 18 E. Civil society, including non-governmental organizations .......................... 19 2 11-48857 A/66/342 I. Introduction 1. In its resolution 64/169, the General Assembly proclaimed the year beginning on 1 January 2011 the International Year for People
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Magazine (16.7Mb)
    b Spring/Summer 2018 • Law Quadrangle OPENING 5 Quotes You’ll See… …In This Issue of the Law Quadrangle 1. “ In many ways, juries are more ready than the law to hold cybercriminals accountable. Jurors understand we aren’t living in a puritanical world anymore and this kind of conduct isn’t acceptable.” (p. 16) 2. “ Between the ideological poles is the big middle ground of Americans who believe climate change is an issue and want something done about it. And they’re willing to support getting their energy from renewable sources—especially now that it doesn’t cost more.” (p. 31) 3. “ Entering law school, I didn’t think I would be advising art and design students on how to make steam more imaginative, but I did and it was really fun.” (p. 50) Law Quadrangle 4. “ I suspect that I am the only person who went to jail directly as a result of having the privilege to study at Michigan Law • Spring/Summer 2018 School.” (p. 65) 5. “I was a junior associate at Jones Day with no real background in immigration law, but I couldn’t stand by knowing this person would face certain persecution and possibly death if she were forced to leave the United States.” (p. 84) 1 06 A MESSAGE FROM DEAN WEST 0 8 BRIEFS 10 Senior Day 12 Student Scholarship Banquets 14 IN PRACTICE 14 A Case of Five-Ring Fever 16 Bringing Cybercrimes to Justice and the Law up to Speed 17 Opportunity and Complexity in the Middle East 18 COVER STORY 18 The Legal Climate of Climate Change 46 FEATURES 46 Navigating a Sea Change 48 Paradise Found 50 @UMICHLAW 50 Linking Detroit’s Small Businesses with U-M Resources 52 Does v.
    [Show full text]
  • From Service Model Unionism to Social Movement Unionism in Mauritius and Rodrigues: a Critical Review of Practice and Trends
    International Research Symposium in Service Management ISSN 1694-0938 From service model unionism to social movement unionism in mauritius and rodrigues: a critical review of practice and trends. Anita Ramgutty-Wong Faculty of Law and Management University of Mauritius Réduit MAURITIUS [email protected] Le Meridien Hotel, Mauritius, 24-27 August 2010 1 International Research Symposium in Service Management ISSN 1694-0938 From service model unionism to social movement unionism in mauritius and rodrigues: a critical review of practice and trends. Paper type: Empirical; Exploratory. Abstract Purpose: The literature on the service or ‘servicing’ model of unionism has lately stressed not only a trend pointing to a gradual movement away from this approach to unionism, but also the necessity for the union movement to seriously consider the adoption of an organizing form of activity, and even better, of gearing their services towards the newer, “social movement” form of unionism in the wake of the pressures of globalization. Design/Methodology: A nationwide study was conducted with a broad spectrum of objectives, and this paper draws from the study to present findings on the orientation of unions along this so-called conceptual continuum (moving from Servicing to Organising to Social movement unionism) of approaches and to discuss the policies and approaches used by unions as they go about their business of serving their members. Findings: The most salient finding is that the highest form of social movement unionism is to be observed not in Mauritius,
    [Show full text]
  • 2549-1296 Volume 3, Number 1, January 2019 Unilateral Claim Ov
    Padjadjaran Journal of International Law ISSN: 2549-2152, EISSN: 2549-1296 Volume 3, Number 1, January 2019 Unilateral Claim over Chagos Archipelago as British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) by United Kingdom Based on International Law Jerina Novita Elpasari Abstract In 1965, United Kingdom (UK) made a unilateral claim over the Chagos Archipelago as British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) based on the BIOT Order of 1965 and Statutory Instrument of 1965 No. 1020. Due to this unilateral act, the Chagos Archipelago no longer parts of Mauritius. Problem arising from Britain's unilateral claim to the territory was further aggravated by the United Kingdom’s act in enforcing population transfer towards all Chagos islanders (Chagossians) out of the territory without adequate compensations and resettlement. This research aims to analyze the legality of unilateral claims over the Chagos archipelago as a BIOT and the enforced transfer of Chagossians from their original residential place by the United Kingdom. It argues that under international law, Chagos Archipelago is recognized as an area that should remain integrated within the territory of Mauritius. It further argues that the UK has violated international law by committing enforced population transfer. Keywords: BIOT, Enforced Population Transfer, Territory, The Chagos Archipelago, Unilateral Act. Klaim Sepihak Inggris terhadap Kepulauan Chagos sebagai British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) Berdasarkan Hukum Internasional Abstrak Pada tahun 1965, Inggris melakukan klaim sepihak atas wilayah Kepulauan Chagos sebagai British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) berdasarkan British Indian Ocean Territory Order of 1965 dan Statutory Instrument of 1965 No. 1020. Kepulauan Chagos merupakan bagian dari Mauritius pada saat Mauritius berada dibawah penjajahan Inggris.
    [Show full text]
  • April - September 2017 for Members Only
    OF INT IETY ER C NA O T S I N O A N I A The Indian Society D L N I L A E W H T of International Law 1959 N E W S L E T T E R VOL. 16, No. 2-3, April - September 2017 For members only President Dr. E. M. Sudarsana Natchiappan Editorial India filed its Request for the indication of provisional measures on 8 Secretary General May 2017, and initiated proceedings against Pakistan in a dispute S. K. Verma concerning alleged violations of Article 36 of the Vienna Convention Vice Presidents on Consular Relations (VCCR) of 24 April 1963 with respect to an Luther Rangreji Indian national, Mr. Jadhav, sentenced to death in Pakistan. The A. K. Ganguli Court begins by considering whether it has jurisdiction prima facie to B. C. Nirmal hear the case. It recalls that India seeks to ground its jurisdiction in Article I of the Optional Protocol to the Vienna Convention, which Treasurer provides that the Court has jurisdiction over “[d]isputes arising out of V.G. Hegde the interpretation or application of the Vienna Convention”. In this regard, the Court notes that the Parties do indeed appear to have differed, and still differ today, on the question of India's consular assistance to Mr. Jadhav under the Vienna Research & Teaching Wing Convention. It further notes that the acts alleged by India, i.e., the alleged failure by Pakistan to provide the Vinai Kumar Singh requisite consular notifications with regard to the arrest and detention of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • ITLOS/PV15/C24/1/Rev.1
    English Version ITLOS/PV.15/C24/1/Rev.1 INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA 2015 Public sitting held on Monday, 10 August 2015, at 9.30 a.m., at the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, Hamburg, President Vladimir Golitsyn presiding THE “ENRICA LEXIE” INCIDENT (Italy v. India) Verbatim Record Present: President Vladimir Golitsyn Vice-President Boualem Bouguetaia Judges P. Chandrasekhara Rao Joseph Akl Rüdiger Wolfrum Tafsir Malick Ndiaye José Luís Jesus Jean-Pierre Cot Anthony Amos Lucky Stanislaw Pawlak Shunji Yanai James L. Kateka Albert J. Hoffmann Zhiguo Gao Jin-Hyun Paik Elsa Kelly David Attard Markiyan Kulyk Alonso Gómez-Robledo Tomas Heidar Judge ad hoc Francesco Francioni Registrar Philippe Gautier ITLOS/PV.15/C24/1/Rev.1 ii 10/08/2015 a.m. Italy is represented by: H.E. Mr Francesco Azzarello, Ambassador of Italy to The Netherlands, The Hague, The Netherlands, as Agent; and Mr Stefano Pontecorvo, Minister Plenipotentiary, Diplomatic Adviser, Ministry of Defence, Ms Stefania Rosini, First Counsellor, Deputy Head, Service for Legal Affairs, Diplomatic Disputes and International Agreements, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation, Mr Mario Antonio Scino, Adv., State Attorney, Office of the Attorney General, as Senior Advisers; Sir Daniel Bethlehem QC, Member of the Bar of England and Wales, 20 Essex Street, London, United Kingdom, Mr Paolo Busco, Member of the Rome Bar, Mr Sudhanshu Swaroop, Member of the Bar of England and Wales, 20 Essex Street, London, United Kingdom, Mr Attila Tanzi, Professor
    [Show full text]
  • Social Democracy in Mauritius
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Stellenbosch University SUNScholar Repository Development with Social Justice? Social Democracy in Mauritius Letuku Elias Phaahla 15814432 Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (International Studies) at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Professor Janis van der Westhuizen March 2010 ii Declaration By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the owner of the copyright thereof (unless to the extent explicitly otherwise stated) and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Signature:……………………….. Date:…………………………….. iii To God be the glory My dearly beloved late sisters, Pabalelo and Kholofelo Phaahla The late Leah Maphankgane The late Letumile Saboshego I know you are looking down with utmost pride iv Abstract Since the advent of independence in 1968, Mauritius’ economic trajectory evolved from the one of a monocrop sugar economy, with the latter noticeably being the backbone of the country’s economy, to one that progressed into being the custodian of a dynamic and sophisticated garment-dominated manufacturing industry. Condemned with the misfortune of not being endowed with natural resources, relative to her mainland African counterparts, Mauritius, nonetheless, was able to break the shackles of limited economic options and one of being the ‘basket-case’ to gradually evolving into being the upper-middle-income country - thus depicting it to be one of the most encouraging economies within the developing world.
    [Show full text]
  • Concept Note 2 Pages
    Ministry of Arts and Culture Republic of Mauritius STRENGTHENING SYNERGIES FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE PROTECTION IN EASTERN AFRICA AND THE ADJACENT INDIAN OCEAN ISLAND STATES REPORT OF THE REGIONAL CONFERENCE AND MINISTERIAL ROUNDTABLE 18 – 20 July 2017, MAURITIUS Table of Contents: 1.0 Introduction ..………………………….…………………………………………………………………….. 3 1.1 Objectives of the Regional Conference ………………………………………………….. 4 1.2 Expected Outcomes ………………………………………………………………………………. 5 2.0 Opening …………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 6 3.0 Presentation of the Agenda and objectives of the Conference ……………………... 12 4.0 Thematic Panels: Discussing Key Areas ………………………………………………………….. 12 4.1 Safeguarding Measures for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict ……………………………………………………………………………………… 13 4.2 Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of 16 Ownership of Cultural Property …………………………………………………………………. 5.0 Outcome of Breakout Sessions ……………………………………………………………………… 27 6.0 Recommendations …………………………………………………………………………………………. 28 7.0 Moving Toward a Regional Statement: the Ministerial Roundtable ……………….. 30 8.0 Closing of the forum …………………………………………………………………………………….… 31 Appendices Appendix 1: Agenda of the Conference/Ministerial Roundtable ……………………………. 32 Appendix 2: Final Recommendations ……………………………………………….………………….. 38 Appendix 3: Final Ministerial Statement ……………………………………………………………….. 40 Appendix 4: List of Participants …………………………………………………………………………..… 44 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Regional Conference and Ministerial Roundtable
    [Show full text]
  • Permanent Mission of India to the United Nations New York
    PERMANENT MISSION OF INDIA TO THE UNITED NATIONS NEW YORK BRIEF ON INDIA AND UNITED NATIONS India’s deepening engagement with the United Nations is based on its steadfast commitment to multilateralism and dialogue as the key for achieving shared goals and addressing common challenges faced by the global community including those related to peace building and peacekeeping, sustainable development, poverty eradication, environment, climate change, terrorism, disarmament, human rights, health and pandemics, migration, cyber security, space and frontier technologies like Artificial Intelligence, comprehensive reform of the United Nations, including the reform of the Security Council, among others. Picture Above: A. Ramaswami Mudaliar, supply member of the Governor General’s executive council and leader of the delegation from India, signing the UN Charter at a ceremony held at the Veterans’ War Memorial Building in San Francisco on June 26, 1945. Source: UN Photo/Rosenberg India was among the select members of the United Nations that signed the Declaration by United Nations at Washington on 1 January 1942. India also participated in the historic UN Conference of International Organization at San Francisco from 25 April to 26 June 1945. As a founding member of the United Nations, India strongly supports the purposes and principles of the UN and has made significant contributions to implementing the goals of the Charter, and the evolution of the UN’s specialized programmes and agencies. India strongly believes that the United Nations and the norms of international relations that it has fostered remain the most efficacious means for tackling today's global challenges. India is steadfast in its efforts to work with the committee of Nations in the spirit of multilateralism to achieve comprehensive and equitable solutions to all problems facing us including development and poverty eradication, climate change, terrorism, piracy, disarmament, peace building and peacekeeping, human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • The First, Carved with a Village Scene B
    LOW HIGH Lot Description Estimate Estimate (lot of 2) Chinese bamboo brush pots; the first, carved with a village scene below a key- 4000 fret band; the second, featuring bamboo and reversed with a poetic colophon, bearing name 'Zhiqian', 7"h $ 250 - 450 Chinese hardwood small brush pot, of cylindrical form with incised bands heightening the 4001 lower edge, and with a flat base, 4.75"h $ 400 - 600 Chinese bamboo and wood vase, the tall cylindrical shape carved with a lotus pond, 4002 bearing signature 'Wang Jian', with wooden rim and base, 11.25"h $ 150 - 250 Chinese triangular form bamboo brush pot, featuring Shoulao followed by two children 4003 holding peaches along with a recumbent deer, 5.6"h $ 150 - 250 Chinese huanghuali wooden brush pot, with thick walls and a slight waist, above the flat 4004 base with a central plug, 6"h $ 300 - 500 4005 Chinese wooden brush pot, carved with three chilong in high relief, accented with floral sprigs, 6.5"h; Provenance: Estate of Father Kirill Hartman, Berkeley, CA $ 150 - 250 Chinese brown glazed ceramic censer, with an everted rim above a low slung body, 4006 flanked by a pair of zoomorphic handles, raised on a tapering low foot, 5.25"w; Provenance: Estate of Dr. Graeme Hanson, San Francisco, CA $ 300 - 500 (lot of 2) Chinese enameled porcelain bowls, molded in the form of flower petals forming 4007 a foliate rim, the exterior decorated with butterflies, flowers and garden rocks, the base marked 'Yishan Tang zhi', 8.25"w $ 300 - 500 Chinese famille rose porcelain brush washer, the compressed
    [Show full text]
  • Bay of Bengal Maritime Boundary Arbitration
    IN THE MATTER OF THE BAY OF BENGAL MARITIME BOUNDARY ARBITRATION - between - THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH - and - THE REPUBLIC OF INDIA AWARD The Arbitral Tribunal: Judge Rüdiger Wolfrum (President) Judge Jean-Pierre Cot Judge Thomas A. Mensah Dr. Pemmaraju Sreenivasa Rao Professor Ivan Shearer Registry: Permanent Court of Arbitration The Hague, 7 July 2014 this page intentionally blank AGENTS, COUNSEL AND OTHER REPRESENTATIVES OF THE PARTIES AGENT OF BANGLADESH AGENT OF INDIA Dr. Dipu Moni, MP Dr. Neeru Chadha Government of the People’s Republic of Joint Secretary & the Legal Adviser Bangladesh Ministry of External Affairs DEPUTY AGENT OF BANGLADESH CO-AGENT OF INDIA Rear Admiral Md. Khurshed Alam (Retd) Mr. Harsh Vardhan Shringla Secretary, Maritime Affairs Unit Joint Secretary (BSM) Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of External Affairs Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh DEPUTY AGENT OF INDIA Mr. Puneet Agrawal Deputy Agent, Director (BSM) Ministry of External Affairs COUNSEL AND ADVOCATES FOR BANGLADESH CHIEF COUNSEL FOR INDIA H.E. The Honourable A.H. Mahmood Ali, MP H.E. Mr. G. E. Vahanvati Foreign Minister, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Attorney General of India Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh COUNSEL FOR INDIA Mr. Md. Shahidul Haque Professor Alain Pellet Foreign Secretary, Ministry of Foreign Affairs University of Paris Ouest, Nanterre-La Défense Government of the People’s Republic of Former Member & Chairman of the International Bangladesh Law Commission, Associate Member of the Institut de Droit International Mr. Mohammad Shahidul Haque Secretary, Legislative & Parliamentary Affairs Professor W.M. Reisman Division, Ministry of Law, Justice and McDougal Professor of Law, Yale University Parliamentary Affairs, Dhaka Member of the Institut de Droit international Professor Payam Akhavan Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • 15204020 BBA.Pdf (1.841Mb)
    Report On Re-branding of a corporate brand: A Case on Meghna Group of Industries By Md. Mazid Hossain Student ID: 15204020 An internship report submitted to the BRAC Business School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Business Administration (BBA) BRAC Business School BRAC University June 6th, 2020 © 2020. BRAC University All rights reserved. Declaration It is hereby declared that 1. The internship report submitted is my/our own original work while completing degree at BRAC University. 2. The report does not contain material previously published or written by a third party, except where this is appropriately cited through full and accurate referencing. 3. The report does not contain material which has been accepted, or submitted, for any other degree or diploma at a university or other institution. 4. I/We have acknowledged all main sources of help. Student’s Full Name & Signature: ___________________________________________ Md. Mazid Hossain Student ID: 15204020 Supervisor’s Full Name & Signature: ___________________________________________ Raisa Tasneem Zaman Lecturer, BRAC Business School BRAC University i Letter of Transmittal Raisa Tasneem Zaman Lecturer, BRAC Business School BRAC University 66 Mohakhali, Dhaka-1212 Subject: Submission of internship report Dear Ma’am, This is my pleasure to inform you that I’ve been appointed as an intern at Meghna Group of Industries from the 8th of January, 2020 for a period of 3 months in the Corporate Brand department. I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your guidance and support without which this report would not have been possible. I have attempted my best to collect all relevant information to make my report comprehensive and written it in a compact format while achieving all the objectives of the report.
    [Show full text]