DOCSLIB.ORG

Susan B. 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Susan B. 2020 Susan B. __________________________ A full-length play By Daphne White Contact: Daphne White 2107 Sacramento Street Berkeley, CA 94702 301-704-2860 [email protected] ©2019 SUSAN B. Synopsis Susan B. was a fierce fighter who refused to let anything stand in her way: not the gun- toting mobs who burned her in effigy, not the blinding snowstorms that kept male speakers at home, and not the newspaper editors who tried to deny her free speech. A Quaker and abolitionist, Susan B. had the outlandish notion that women and men were created equal. But in a world where women were considered the property of their husbands even after the slaves were freed, Susan B. had to make gut-wrenching choices. Should she support the Fifteenth Amendment, which offered suffrage to black men but not to women? Should she accept funding from a Trump-like racist who supported woman suffrage, but not black suffrage? More than 150 years before the #MeToo movement, Susan B. Anthony was defending women who had been sexually exploited, discarded, and left to die in insane asylums. She was called “shrill,” she was called “unreasonable,” and if she were running for office today she would certainly be called “unelectable.” How can we understand the battle between the sexes if we don’t even know our own history? 2. CHARACTERS (5F, 4M) Susan B. Anthony, white, 31 when we first see her. Tall, thin, tightly wound, stands very erect. In the first two scenes she wears simple plaid dresses; from the third scene forward she wears all-black dresses; in later scenes she adds her trademark red scarf. Elizabeth Cady Stanton, white, 52 when we first see her. Short, stout, sunny, brilliant, forthright, but also haughty. She is matronly and cultivates a Martha Washington look. Also plays First Woman. Lucy Stone, white, 33 when we first see her. Plain-looking, with a mole on her face, but famous for her mellifluous yet very powerful voice. Also plays Phoebe Harris (Phelps), an upper-class white woman in her early thirties. Anna Dickinson, white, 24 when we first see her. Petite, charismatic, brilliant, temperamental, a prima donna, and one of the most famous lecturers of her day. Also plays Elizabeth Warren and Second Woman. Sojourner Truth, black, 54 when we first see her. Six feet tall and muscular, she speaks with the confidence and cadence of a practiced preacher. She wears home-spun clothes, and always carries her autobiography and photos with her in public settings. She speaks with a slight Dutch (not Southern) accent. Frederick Douglass, black, 49 when we first see him. Tall, dignified, elegantly dressed, and charismatic. His hair is not yet gray. Wendell Phillips, white, 56 when we first see him. Wealthy Boston brahmin, lawyer, orator, one of best-known men of his day. Also plays First Minister, First Senator, and Judge Hunt. George Francis Train, white, 38. Eccentric, narcissistic, colorful Trump-like figure who was the real-life inspiration for Around the World in 80 Days. Wears patent leather boots; a white vest; blue jacket and lavender kid gloves. Also plays Second Minister, Second Senator, Jack Winthrop and District Attorney. 3. ACT ONE SCENE ONE At rise, the stage is dark. After a few seconds, there is a very loud clap of thunder, followed by bursts of lightening. Suddenly, SUSAN appears out of the darkness. She is disheveled and wind-blown, her clothes fluttering around her wildly. She looks lost and disoriented, until she notices a door in the middle of the stage. (This door is not connected to anything, but we cannot see what is on the other side.) Susan straightens her hair and tries to get her dress under control as she walks over to the door and starts knocking frantically. SUSAN Elizabeth! Open the door! ELIZABETH Unseen, speaking from behind the door. No! SUSAN Do you know how hard it was for me to get here? ELIZABETH Silence. SUSAN The border is almost impermeable now! ELIZABETH You don’t need to tell m that. SUSAN So let me in! ELIZABETH No! 4. SUSAN Elizabeth Cady Stanton! You open that door right now! ELIZABETH Excuse me? SUSAN Elizabeth, please! I don’t know how much time we have. [Beat.] You have never even tried to cross! You have no ideas of the dangers involved. ELIZABETH Who is this? SUSAN You know perfectly well! ELIZABETH Actually, I haven’t the foggiest. SUSAN Well, perhaps my voice has changed, what with being on the other side for so long ... and, come to think of it, Elizabeth, you don’t sound quite yourself either. [Beat.] All right, then. It’s Susan! ELIZABETH Susan who? SUSAN Susan B. Anthony, that’s who! Now open up, before I have to break that door down. I’ve done it before -- do not make me do it again! Elizabeth Warren opens the door, wearing her signature outfit of black pants, a black top and a jewel-tone jacket. SUSAN Who on earth are you? I am looking for Elizabeth! ELIZABETH I am Elizabeth. [Beat.] Elizabeth Warren. SUSAN Elizabeth who? [Taking in Elizabeth’s pants.] I would have been stoned for wearing trousers like that. But ... they are quite attractive, actually. Even nicer than Bloomers! 5. ELIZABETH Thank you. But I don’t quite see ... SUSAN Remind me who you are again, young lady? ELIZABETH Young! Right. Of course. My name is Elizabeth Warren. I am ... er ... running for President of the United States. The election is coming up in 2020. SUSAN I see. That is splendid, dear, splendid! I predicted this, you know, more than a century ago. So tell me: how many women presidents have we had so far? ELIZABETH Silence. SUSAN Go on, don’t hold me in suspense! Three? ELIZABETH No. SUSAN Heavens to Betsy! More than three? I always said that failure was impossible. So five? Seven? ELIZABETH Actually ... none. SUSAN None? But that is not possible! I have heard that women got suffrage ... let me see now ... one year ago our time, that is 100 years your time! You mean to tell me that in all that time, you did not manage to elect one woman President? You cannot be serious, Elizabeth! ELIZABETH Well ... the deck has been rather stacked against us. SUSAN For one hundred years? 6. ELIZABETH We have tried. We are still trying! Persisting, even. But any time a woman dares to run for president, she is immediately demeaned and called “unelectable.” SUSAN Unelectable! What a pile of horse manure! [Beat.] You still have horses, don’t you? ELIZABETH We have horse’s asses. SUSAN Is that why you were hiding behind that door? ELIZABETH I am having a ... dark night of the soul. I rarely allow myself the luxury, but tonight ... it has been rather a lot lately. SUSAN There is no time for that. No time! Look, half the population fo this country is still female, is it not? ELIZABETH Yes, but/ SUSAN /And when women are given the opportunity to vote for another woman, surely/ ELIZABETH /It hasn’t quite worked out that way, Miss Anthony. SUSAN I don’t understand. Why on earth not? ELIZABETH They say we are shrill. We are not “likable.” SUSAN For heaven’s sake. Andrew Jackson was not likable -- but he was still elected president! ELIZABETH Well, that’s different. He was a man. And people could imagine having a beer with him. SUSAN Excuse me? 7. ELIZABETH “Likable,” today, means that a voter would want to have beer with you. SUSAN So if you want to run for president, you have to like beer? ELIZABETH Well ... no. But people have to like having beer with you! SUSAN I have never tasted any alcoholic drink in my life. I would as soon touch arsenic! ELIZABETH Temperance is not what it used to be. SUSAN I am sorry to hear that. You know, even at the Boston Tea Party, the men took care to throw the women’s favorite beverage into the harbor, but they kept their own drinks dry. And the tax on tobacco and whiskey was just as high! ELIZABETH Increasing taxes on the tobacco-and-whiskey crowd is a big part of my plan, actually. But people say that I want to change too much, too fast. SUSAN My dear, they told us the same thing! We were called “unreasonable” and “hysterical” and “fanatical radicals.” We were even called “unsexed socialists.” ELIZABETH Unsexed socialists? SUSAN Oh, yes! Elizabeth and I were great admirers of Karl Marx. We believed it was important to reconstruct the very foundations of society and teach the nation the sacredness of all human rights. ELIZABETH That sounds like deep structural change to me! But why “unsexed?” SUSAN Because men were under the impression that when women think too much, the blood needed to sustain their ovaries and womb is delivered to the brain, which results in serious illness. With severe and irreversible consequences. 8. ELIZABETH Men are still spooked by female bodies. Our current president has said that a female journalist had blood coming out of her “wherever.” SUSAN I would have thought that kind of claptrap would have ended by now! You know, we were told that women should not go into polling places, because politics were filthy and would sully our dresses. ELIZABETH So you did you do it, Miss Anthony? How did you keep up the fight for five decades? SUSAN We dealt in thunderbolts, Elizabeth and I. She forged them, I threw them. We always understood that cautious, careful women never can bring about a reform.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 12E111miiill[11 Beside the Weeds
    • in bur bonittr. in 1879. TERMS-4i.co a rear in Advance PAUL MOTTE & CO., Publishers. Established by SAMUEL MOTTER FRIDAY, FEBIMA_IZY 2, 1894-6 NO. 86. VOL. XI.7. EMMITSBURG, MD., WISHES. with them peach trees—ain't there I -SHOOTING 11')NKERS. IF I HAD KNOWN YOU. DIRECTORY fruit? if I had known you, oh, if Iliad known yon. you imagine any young WO- FOR FREDERICK COUNTY I asked a little child one day. "'And do In other days when youth and love were A child intent on joyous play, man in her senses would marry you and GREAT SPORT WHICH IS FOUND IN strong, toe Circuit Court. "My little one, pray tell to live here?' I cried. THE NORTHWEST. I would have raised a temple to enthrone you Your dearest wish; .. hat may it he?" James MeSherry On some fair pinnacle of cloudless song. Chief Judge--lion. The little one thought for awhile. "'Do I? Well, there's no imagination Associate Judges-1ton. John T. Vinson and What is Then answered with a wistful smile, about it. There's three women have If you had touched me then with your dear Hon. John A. Lynch. Countless Swarms Which Congregata Be- State's Attorney-Edw. S. Eichelberger. "The thing that 1 wish most of all married me and lived here. Two of 'em's laughter, tween the Red River 'alley ai,t the 311L- Clerk. of the Court-John L. Jordan. Is to be big, like you, toil tall." ildad and buried, and yonder stands As now its echo smites me in my grief, Orphan's Court.
    [Show full text]
  • May � I960 Collegiates on Campus
    ot GAMMA PHI BETA - :m. STUDENT UNION, UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA MAY � I960 COLLEGIATES ON CAMPUS Two Moonlight Girls of Phi Sigma Kappa were Sharon Walker llefll of Nalional Baton Twirling champion is Harlie Judy of Beta Kop Arizona Slate Universily, and Ann Gibson Irighl) of Oregon Stofe College. chapter, Arizona Stale University. J -;''-4f. Lynne Wallers makes il three in a row for Alpha Kappa chapler al Ihe Universily of Manifoba. She is fhe new president of Ihe IVomen's Associafion, known as Wakonda, and Ihe third Gamma Phi Beta in succession Yearbook Oueen of Carla Ewell, Homecoming allendanl at Judy Davis wos selected as Kappa Julie Haile, A, fo hold fhe ofRce. She will organize all Oklahoma Slate University. Sigmo's Sfordusf Oueen of fhe Univer- Universily. .) women's aclivilies on and serve as campus sity of Arizona. one of a seven member executive board of Ihe Student's Union. FRONT COVER Student Union Memorial Building at the University of Arizona, THE CRESCENT where Alpha Epsilon chapter of Gamma Phi Beta was chartered April 29, 1922. of Gamma Phi Beta First of four new buildings to be dedicated during the 75th an niversary year at the University ot Arizona was the new Home Economics building (pictured above), which also houses the school Volume LX May, 1960 Number of nursing. Center of the building is a 3-story patio spanned at the second floor level by a Y-shaped bridge. 2 Frontispiece: Come to Convention 3 A Visit to the University of Arizona Editorial Staff: 4 Nevada Members Assist with 1960 Olympics Ardis McBroom Marek (Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Wendell Phillips Wendell Phillips
    “THE CHINAMAN WORKS CHEAP BECAUSE HE IS A BARBARIAN AND SEEKS GRATIFICATION OF ONLY THE LOWEST, THE MOST INEVITABLE WANTS.”1 For the white abolitionists, this was a class struggle rather than a race struggle. It would be quite mistaken for us to infer, now that the civil war is over and the political landscape has 1. Here is what was said of the Phillips family in Nathaniel Morton’s NEW ENGLAND’S MEMORIAL (and this was while that illustrious family was still FOB!): HDT WHAT? INDEX WENDELL PHILLIPS WENDELL PHILLIPS shifted, that the stereotypical antebellum white abolitionist in general had any great love for the welfare of black Americans. White abolitionist leaders knew very well what was the source of their support, in class conflict, and hence Wendell Phillips warned of the political danger from a successful alliance between the “slaveocracy” of the South and the Cotton Whigs of the North, an alliance which he termed “the Lords of the Lash and the Lords of the Loom.” The statement used as the title for this file, above, was attributed to Phillips by the news cartoonist and reformer Thomas Nast, in a cartoon of Columbia facing off a mob of “pure white” Americans armed with pistols, rocks, and sticks, on behalf of an immigrant with a pigtail, that was published in Harper’s Weekly on February 18, 1871. There is no reason to suppose that the cartoonist Nast was failing here to reflect accurately the attitudes of this Boston Brahman — as we are well aware how intensely uncomfortable this man was around any person of color.
    [Show full text]
  • American Abolitionists and the Problem of Resistance, 1831-1861
    From Moral Suasion to Political Confrontation: American Abolitionists and the Problem of Resistance, 1831-1861 James Stewart In January, 1863, as warfare raged between North and South, the great abolitionist orator Wendell Phillips addressed an enormous audience of over ten thousand in Brooklyn, New York. Just days earlier, President Abraham Lincoln, in his Emancipation Proclamation, had defined the destruction of slavery as the North’s new and overriding war aim. This decision, Phillips assured his listeners, marked the grand culmination “of a great fight, going on the world over, and which began ages ago...between free institutions and caste institutions, Freedom and Democracy against institutions of privilege and class.”[1] A serious student of the past, Phillips’s remarks acknowledged the fact that behind the Emancipation Proclamation lay a long history of opposition to slavery by not only African Americans, free and enslaved, but also by ever- increasing numbers of whites. In Haiti, Cuba, Jamaica, Brazil and Surinam, slave insurrection helped to catalyze emancipation. Abolition in the United States, by contrast, had its prelude in civil war among whites, not in black insurrection, a result impossible to imagine had not growing numbers of Anglo-Americans before 1861 chosen to resist the institution of slavery directly and to oppose what they feared was its growing dominion over the nation’s government and civic life. No clearer example of this crucial development can be found than Wendell Phillips himself. 1 For this reason his career provides a useful starting point for considering the development of militant resistance within the abolitionist movement and its influence in pushing northerners closer first, to Civil War, and then to abolishing slavery.
    [Show full text]
  • December 6, 2019 | Volume XVII, Issue 14
    December 6, 2019 | Volume XVII, Issue 14 oped an eclectic collection of music that understanding. Joining the chorus in his promotes justice, peace, and the cele- new position as accompanist is Christo- Holiday Choral Extravaganzas bration of life,” says Gillham, who helms pher Schroeder. Sweep aside the crass consumerism, in song during the holidays. If you hav- the ensemble celebrating 35 years in The Baltimore Men’s Chorus (Bal- mindless bustle, canned Christmas “mu- en’t heard them, now’s the perfect time! 2020. “We sing music in a wide variety timoremenschorus.org), also celebrating zak,” and family tensions often rising Baltimore’s New Wave Singers of styles, languages, and traditions each 35 years, will present two winter concerts to a pitch, and there’s one authentical- (Newwavesingers.org) – which bills it- year. Through songs of hope, diversity, featuring – dig the gallantry! – music by ly good thing about self as “Maryland’s gay, les- inclusion, and humor, we celebrate all women composers and arrangers. the holidays – how it New Wave Singers bian, bisexual, transgender, of humanity in its infinite variations and The first performance of “Women’s brings together peo- and straight mixed chorus, challenge our communities to embrace Works” is Saturday, December 14th at ple in song. Even if and Baltimore Men’s welcoming members of all equality, harmony, and —continued on page 4 spontaneous neigh- genders, identities, and sex- borhood wassailing is Chorus whip up ualities” – will present its hard to come by now seasonal song winter concerts Saturday De- (who wants to get cember 7th at 7 pm at Epiph- busted for public drinking?), hundreds of any Episcopal Church (2216 Pot Spring millions around the world look to choral Road, Timonium) and Sunday, Decem- forces this time of year to embody ide- ber 8th, 4 pm, at Grace United Methodist als of camaraderie in pursuit of beauty, Church (5407 North Charles Street, Bal- concord, and maybe even a spark of the timore).
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln and the Abolitionists Allen C
    History Faculty Publications History Fall 2000 Lincoln and the Abolitionists Allen C. Guelzo Gettysburg College Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/histfac Part of the United States History Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. The definitive version was published as Guelzo, Allen C. "Lincoln and the Abolitionists," The iW lson Quarterly, 8(2000), 58-70. This is the authors's version of the work. This publication appears in Gettysburg College's institutional repository by permission of the copyright owner for personal use, not for redistribution. Cupola permanent link: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/histfac/1 This open access article is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Lincoln and the Abolitionists Abstract It has always been one of the ironies of the era of the Civil War and the end of slavery in the United States that the man who played the role of Great Emancipator of the slaves was so hugely mistrusted and so energetically vilified by the party of abolition. Abraham Lincoln, whatever his larger reputation as the liberator of more than three million black slaves in the Emancipation Proclamation, has never entirely shaken off the er putation of being something of a half-heart about it. [excerpt] Disciplines History | United States History This article is available at The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/histfac/1 5. "FIENDS...FACING ZIONWARDS": ABRAHAM LINCOLN'S RELUCTANT EMBRACE OF THE ABOLITIONISTS It has always been one of the ironies of the era of the Civil War and the end of slavery in the United States that the man who played the role of Great Emancipator of the slaves was so hugely mistrusted and so energetically vilified by the party of abolition.
    [Show full text]
  • ABOLITIONISTS and the CONSTITUTION Library of Congress/Theodore R
    ABOLITIONISTS AND THE CONSTITUTION Library of Congress/Theodore R. Davis R. Congress/Theodore of Library The Constitution allowed Congress to ban the importation of slaves in 1808, but slave auctions, like the one pictured here, continued in southern states in the 19th century. Two great abolitionists, William Lloyd Garrison and deep-seated moral sentiments that attracted many Frederick Douglass, once allies, split over the Constitu- followers (“Garrisonians”), but also alienated many tion. Garrison believed it was a pro-slavery document others, including Douglass. from its inception. Douglass strongly disagreed. Garrison and Northern Secession Today, many Americans disagree about how to in- Motivated by strong, personal Christian convic- terpret the Constitution. This is especially true with our tions, Garrison was an uncompromising speaker and most controversial social issues. For example, Ameri- writer on the abolition of slavery. In 1831, Garrison cans disagree over what a “well-regulated militia” launched his own newspaper, The Liberator, in means in the Second Amendment, or whether the gov- Boston, to preach the immediate end of slavery to a ernment must always have “probable cause” under the national audience. In his opening editorial, he in- Fourth Amendment to investigate terrorism suspects. formed his readers of his then radical intent: “I will These kinds of disagreements about interpretation are not retreat a single inch, and I will be heard!” not new. In fact, they have flared up since the Consti- Garrison also co-founded the American Anti- tutional Convention in 1787. One major debate over the Slavery Society (AAS) in Boston, which soon had Constitution’s meaning caused a rift in the abolitionist over 200,000 members in several Northern cities.
    [Show full text]
  • Minardi on Gradert, 'Puritan Spirits in the Abolitionist Imagination'
    H-Nationalism Minardi on Gradert, 'Puritan Spirits in the Abolitionist Imagination' Review published on Monday, June 14, 2021 Kenyon Gradert. Puritan Spirits in the Abolitionist Imagination. American Beginnings, 1500-1900 Series. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2020. 256 pp. $50.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-226-69402-3. Reviewed by Margot Minardi (Reed College)Published on H-Nationalism (June, 2021) Commissioned by Evan C. Rothera (University of Arkansas - Fort Smith) Printable Version: https://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=56207 Reading Kenyon Gradert’s though-provoking new book,Puritan Spirits in the Abolitionist Imagination, made me realize that I had completely overlooked the four hundredth anniversary of the Mayflower landing. Granted, most of us had other things to think about in 2020. Nevertheless, the oversight was startling for me, a Massachusetts-born-and-bred historian of early America for whom the discovery, in a college history class, that 1620 wasn’t the beginning of American history was a memorable shock. Today, though, the Pilgrims and the Puritans who followed them to Massachusetts don’t seem as significant as they used to in popular historical memory. Over the past year, the latest front in the culture wars has been dominated by a contest between 1619 and 1776 as the origin points of American history—with the Pilgrims receding into a distant background.[1] For New Englanders in the nineteenth century, the Pilgrim and Puritan origins of the United States would be nearly impossible to forget, even (or especially) in a time of national crisis. Gradert focuses on a particular group of nineteenth-century New Englanders—those who were active in, or at least sympathetic to, the movement against slavery—to examine how their perceptions of Puritan roots shaped their antislavery consciousness.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 “`And There Shall Be No More Sea.' William Lloyd Garrison and The
    “`And There Shall Be No More Sea.’ William Lloyd Garrison and the Transatlantic Abolitionist Movement.” Richard J. Blackett When in early 1865 the Stars and Stripes were once again raised over Fort Sumter William Lloyd Garrison and George Thompson were there to witness the symbolic reuniting of the country at the end of a brutal civil war. It seemed a fitting culmination to the work of the two men who together had struggled for over thirty years to keep the transatlantic abolitionist movement together and who were considered by their peers to be the two pivotal figures in the struggle to win freedom for slaves in the United States. Between them they had crisscrossed the Atlantic half a dozen times in a quest to rally public opinion in favor of abolition inspired in part by Garrison’s bold internationalist declaration: “Our Country is the World—Our Countrymen Are Mankind.” Their efforts did not always pay immediate dividends, but standing at the site where the first shots in the war were fired, both men could take some comfort in the fact that their persistence and commitment to the cause of emancipation had finally borne fruit. The movement had wobbled at times and on occasion had even cracked, but the frequent exchange of visits that they and others made had managed to maintain a semblance of unity in an otherwise fractious alliance. The exchange of letters, books and pamphlets were crucial means of contact, but the glue that held the movement together was the exchange of visits during which friendships were forged and renewed, money raised and attempts made to influence public opinion in favor of emancipation.
    [Show full text]
  • Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass Author: Frederick Douglass, 1817?–95 First Published: 1845
    NARRATIVE OF THE LIFE OF FREDERICK DOUGLASS, AN AMERICAN SLAVE BY FREDERICK DOUGLASS 7^WYS`f7Taa]e NARRATIVE OF THE LIFE OF FREDERICK DOUGLASS, AN AMERICAN SLAVE. WRITTEN BY HIMSELF. BOSTON PUBLISHED AT THE ANTI-SLAVERY OFFICE, NO. 25 CORNHILL 1845 Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1845, BY FREDERICK DOUGLASS, in the Clerk’s Office of the District Court of Massachusetts. COPYRIGHT INFORMATION Book: Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass Author: Frederick Douglass, 1817?–95 First published: 1845 The original book is in the public domain in the United States and in most, if not all, other countries as well. Readers outside the United States should check their own countries’ copyright laws to be certain they can legally download this ebook. The Online Books Page has an FAQ which gives a summary of copyright durations for many other countries, as well as links to more official sources. This PDF ebook was created by José Menéndez. PREFACE. IN the month of August, 1841, I attended an anti-slavery convention in Nantucket, at which it was my happiness to become acquainted with FREDERICK DOUGLASS, the writer of the following Narrative. He was a stranger to nearly every member of that body; but, having recently made his escape from the southern prison-house of bondage, and feeling his curiosity excited to ascertain the principles and measures of the abolitionists,—of whom he had heard a somewhat vague description while he was a slave,—he was induced to give his attendance, on the occasion alluded to, though at that time a resident in New Bedford.
    [Show full text]
  • White House Shows Nation Photos of Missile Breakup
    ■<; ^ ^ \ . WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY «, IM t Averag^ D ifly Nat Prlii^ The Wcathw i^anrliiPBtpr lEopnit^ J|praUi FMfMMl tiV.M. W M th tf VllMsiy A n il'' includiat •,141 fadenl axtmdad IMF' Decrease Noted olalini, fipom 4$,a90, iaataidiag 13,921 is-Mi FManr p e o t f , Town 6,71i isiMnd SKlaiidsd dMma. In Idle Claims This taMal dalaw fIM to Man­ chester amounted to 161, and oon^ HURRY TO Moncheefar—-id CUy of VUiago Charm IlM Bucsktey School P T A will tlnuad daima to 1,04A Of the to­ cor h Hobo Whiat party ICon- tltaamployment daima fUad in tal, unemployed women numbered at S pjn. at the achool awU- Manchaster last week totaled 400, or 87.8 par cent (K16HTBSN PAGiS) MANCHESTER CONN., THURSDAY, FEBRUARY T, 1968 PRICE nVE CKllTf r fr lm ii Mra. Donald Oeer la ohali^ 1,307, a drop o f 14, or 1J per cent, ▼OL. L 3 Ir NO. 109 man. M ra Lloyd Odell, ho^dtallty from thoae filed Gm prevloua week. There were H agent InUraUto HOUSE &. chairman, la n cbarKs of Mfresh- In the state, aa a whole, elalips daima and 84 partlu dalinb. manta. Mambara are reminded to decreased by 493 to 48,4#4. For W ith «,494, B r i^ p o r t reported brine oarda and Itema for the the comparable period last year, the olaina tu r n last , weak, whM. Tiokata wUI be avallabi* at daima In the state rose to 49,286, followed by Hartford with 0|P82.
    [Show full text]
  • The Caning of Charles Sumner: Slavery, Race, and Ideology in the Age of the Civil War" (2003)
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Afro-American Studies Faculty Publication Series Afro-American Studies 2003 The ac ning of Charles Sumner: Slavery, race, and ideology in the age of the Civil War M Sinha [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/afroam_faculty_pubs Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Sinha, M, "The caning of Charles Sumner: Slavery, race, and ideology in the age of the Civil War" (2003). Journal of the Early Republic. 21. 10.2307/3125037 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Afro-American Studies at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Afro-American Studies Faculty Publication Series by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CANING OF CHARLES SUMNER: SLAVERY, RACE, AND IDEOLOGY IN THE AGE OF THE CIVIL WAR Manisha Sinha On May 22, 1856, Preston Smith Brooks, a South Carolinian congressman, assaulted a seated Charles Sumner, antislavery senator from Massachusetts, in the Senate chamber. Brooks rained blows on Sumner's head and shoulders with his cane while Representative Laurence M. Keitt, a secessionist colleague from South Carolina, kept others at bay. Brooks later described the caning in a letter to his brother, "I struck him with my cane and gave him about 30 first rate stripes with a gutta perch cane.... Every lick went where I intended. For about the first five of six licks he offered to make fight but I plied him so rapidly that he did not touch me.
    [Show full text]