Space Industry Business Opportunities in Japan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Space Industry Business Opportunities in Japan EU-Japan Centre for Industrial Cooperation Space Industry Business Opportunities in Japan: Analysis on the Market Potential for EU SMEs Involved in the Earth-Observation Products & Services Tokyo, October 2016 Ryuichi Dunphy 1 Disclaimer The information contained in this publication reflects the views of the author and not necessarily the views of the EU-Japan Centre for Industrial Cooperation, the views of the EU Commission or Japan authorities. The author believes that this paper is reliable and reasonably clear. While utmost care was taken to check and translate all information used in this study, the author and the EU-Japan Centre may not be held responsible for any errors that might appear. This report does not constitute legal advice in terms of business development cases. The author can be reached at [email protected]. About the Author Ryuichi Dunphy is an Aerospace Engineer with a Master Degree in Aerospace Engineering from Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands, and a Dual Bachelor Degree in Space Engineering and Physics from the University of Queensland in Australia. During his academic tenure, he worked as a project manager for feasibility studies with NASA Langley Research Centre on manned exploration mission of Mars, and also with the Brazilian Institute of Space Studies (INPE) on the microsatellite-based internet and remote-sensing system for the Amazon region. Prior to his graduate studies at TU Delft, he worked as a mechanical engineer in Australia, and after graduating, he worked as a satellite data processing support engineer at Portuguese Institute of Ocean & Atmospheric Studies (IPMA) in Lisbon. Ryuichi is part Japanese, and is fluent in Japanese language. He has worked in Japan and has a deep understanding of the Japanese business culture and practices, as well as understanding of Asia after studying and working in Singapore and China. The 6-month MINERVA research fellow enabled him to develop a profound understanding of the market landscape of the Japanese space industry, and build an extensive network with the key players in both private and public sector. 2 Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to express my sincerest gratitude to the EU-Japan Centre for Industrial Cooperation and Mr. Silviu Jora for accepting me for the MINERVA Research Fellowship program. The research topic was truly fascinating, and it enabled me to not only build valuable network with the key players in the Japanese space industry, but also greatly deepen my understanding of the Japanese space program. I would like to thank Mr. Fabrizio Mura for his continuous support throughout my placement. I truly appreciate how he was always available for consultation, and his insight and ideas greatlJPYhanced the content of my research. I would also like to thank Ms. Yoko Kadoya for her support and guidance with my project. Her ideas and advice were simply impeccable, and they greatly assisted me in networking with various stakeholders in the Japanese space industry. Working with Fabrizio and Yoko has been the highlight of my experience at the centre where I learnt immensely about EU-Japan relationship. Last but not least, I would like to thank my fellow MINERVA researchers, Manuel, Guillaume and Ines, and also all the staff at the EU-Japan Centre for making my 6 months most memorable. I look forward to working with you again in the future. Oct 2017 Ryuichi Dunphy 3 1 Table of Contents Table of Figures ................................................................................................................................... 8 List of Abbreviations ......................................................................................................................... 12 Introduction........................................................................................................................................ 14 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 15 1 Japanese Space Scene ................................................................................................................. 19 1.1 Overview ................................................................................................................................... 19 1.2 Japanese Space Agency ........................................................................................................... 20 1.3 History ....................................................................................................................................... 23 1.4 Key Government Bodies .......................................................................................................... 24 1.5 Main Aerospace Companies..................................................................................................... 26 2 Japanese Space Policy ................................................................................................................. 30 2.1 Background ............................................................................................................................... 30 2.2 Basic Space Law ....................................................................................................................... 32 2.3 Basic Plan of Space Policy ....................................................................................................... 34 2.4 Government Budget ................................................................................................................. 37 2.5 Key Space Projects ................................................................................................................... 39 2.6 Recent Policy Developments .................................................................................................... 42 2.6.1 Space Activities Act .......................................................................................................... 42 2.6.2 Remote-Sensing Act .......................................................................................................... 43 2.7 Commercialisation & Promotion of Space .............................................................................. 43 2.7.1 Establishment of New Enterprise Promotion Department ........................................... 43 2.7.2 Development of New Business Solution using Satellite Data ....................................... 45 4 2.7.3 Space Exploration Innovation Hub ................................................................................. 45 3 Japanese Earth-Observation Industry ...................................................................................... 47 3.1 Japan’s Earth-Observation Program ...................................................................................... 47 3.1.1 Main Issues........................................................................................................................ 49 3.1.2 Current Missions ............................................................................................................... 50 3.1.3 Future Missions ................................................................................................................ 53 3.1.4 Past Missions ..................................................................................................................... 56 3.2 Value-Chain Analysis .............................................................................................................. 60 3.2.1 Industry Groups ................................................................................................................ 64 3.3 Recent Developments ............................................................................................................... 67 3.3.1 New EO Satellite Developers ........................................................................................... 67 3.3.2 Commercial EO Satellite Operation ................................................................................ 68 3.3.3 Growing Interests in Overseas Expansion & Collaboration .......................................... 69 3.4 EO Data Provision .................................................................................................................... 70 3.4.1 Open Free Data ................................................................................................................. 71 3.4.2 Commercial Data .............................................................................................................. 73 3.4.3 Compatibility with the EU’s Data Policy ........................................................................ 74 3.5 International Cooperation ....................................................................................................... 75 3.5.1 Government Funding Programs ...................................................................................... 75 3.5.2 Inter-Governmental Initiatives ....................................................................................... 77 3.5.3 Inter-Agency Agreements ................................................................................................. 79 3.6 SWOT Analysis ......................................................................................................................... 80 3.6.1 Strengths ........................................................................................................................... 80 3.6.2 Weaknesses ......................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Evaluation of Stereoscopic Geoeye-1 Satellite Imagery to Assess Landscape and Stand Level Characteristics
    EVALUATION OF STEREOSCOPIC GEOEYE-1 SATELLITE IMAGERY TO ASSESS LANDSCAPE AND STAND LEVEL CHARACTERISTICS K. Kliparchuk, M.Sc, GISP a, Dr. D. Collins, P.Geo. b a Hatfield Consultants Partnership, 200-850 Harbourside Drive, North Vancouver, BC, V7P0A3 Canada – [email protected] b BC Ministry of Forests and Range, Coast Forest Region, 2100 Labieux Road, Nanaimo, BC, V9T6E9, Canada - [email protected] Commission I, WG I/3 KEY WORDS: Remote sensing, GeoEye-1, effectiveness evaluation, forest resource management, stereo, photogrammetry ABSTRACT: An ongoing remote sensing project has been underway within the Coast Forest Region since 2000. The initial parts of the project investigated the application of commercially available high-resolution satellite imagery to resource feature mapping and compliance and enforcement surveillance. In the current project, stereo imagery from the new GeoEye-1 satellite was acquired. This system provides 0.5m panchromatic and 1.65m colour imagery, which is approximately a four time increase in spatial resolution compared to IKONOS imagery. Stereo imagery at this resolution enables the delineation of single trees, coarse woody debris measurement and the generation of Digital Elevation Models and estimation of volumes of material displaced by landslides. Change detection and identification of high priority zones for Compliance & Enforcement investigation is greatly enhanced. Results of this research are presented and discussed. 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction The initial focus of the project was to investigate the application of commercially available high-resolution satellite imagery to resource feature mapping and compliance and enforcement surveillance. A previous published study by the authors in 2008 extended the use of high resolution IKONOS imagery through Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • APRIL 1995 R!' a ! DY April 1995 Number 936
    APRIL 1995 R!' A ! DY April 1995 Number 936 I Earthquake epicen.,.s -IN THE SEA ?ABOVE THE SEA 4 The wave 22Weather prediction 6 What's going on? 24What is El Nino? 8 Knowledge is power 26Clouds, typhoons and hurricanes 10 Bioluminescence 28Highs, lows and fronts 11 Sounds in the sea 29Acid rain 12 Why is the ocean blue? 30 Waves 14 The sea floor 31The Gulf Stream 16 Going with the floe 32 The big picture: blue and littoral waters 18 Tides *THE ENVIRONMENT 34 TheKey West Campaign 19 Navyoceanographers 36 What's cookin' on USS Theodore Roosevek c 20Sea lanes of communication 38 GW Sailors put the squeeze on trash 40 Cleaning up on the West Coast 42Whale flies south after rescue 2 CHARTHOUSE M BEARINGS 48 SHIPMATES On the Covers Front cover: View of the Western Pacific takenfrom Apollo 13, in 1970. Photo courtesy of NASA. Opposite page: "Destroyer Man,"oil painting by Walter Brightwell. Back cover: EM3 Jose L. Tapia aboard USS Gary (FFG 51). Photo by JO1 Ron Schafer. so ” “I Charthouse Drug Education For Youth program seeks sponsors The Navy is looking for interested active and reserve commandsto sponsor the Drug Education For Youth (DEFY) program this summer. In 1994, 28 military sites across the nation helped more than 1,500 youths using the prepackaged innovative drug demand reduction program. DEFY reinforces self-esteem, goal- setting, decision-making and sub- stance abuse resistance skills of nine to 12-year-old children. This is a fully- funded pilot program of theNavy and DOD. DEFY combines a five to eight- day, skill-building summer camp aboard a military base with a year-long mentor program.
    [Show full text]
  • May-June 293-WEB
    May-June 2007 Issue 293 jazz Free &blues report www.jazz-blues.com now in our 33rd year KOKO TAYLOR KOKO TAYLOR Old School Published by Martin Wahl A New CD... Communications On Tour... Editor & Founder Bill Wahl & Appearing at the Chicago Blues Festival Layout & Design Bill Wahl The last time I saw Koko Taylor Operations Jim Martin she was a member of the audience at Pilar Martin Buddy Guy’s Legends in Chicago. It’s Contributors been about 15 years now, and while I Michael Braxton, Mark Cole, no longer remember who was on Kelly Ferjutz, Dewey Forward, stage that night – I will never forget Chris Hovan, Nancy Ann Lee, Koko sitting at a table surrounded by Peanuts, Wanda Simpson, Mark fans standing about hoping to get an Smith, Dave Sunde, Duane Verh, autograph...or at least say hello. The Emily Wahl and Ron Weinstock. Queen of the Blues was in the house that night...and there was absolutely Check out our costantly updated no question as to who it was, or where website. Now you can search for CD Reviews by artists, titles, record she was sitting. Having seen her elec- labels, keyword or JBR Writers. 15 trifying live performances several years of reviews are up and we’ll be times, combined with her many fine going all the way back to 1974. Alligator releases, it was easy to un- derstand why she was engulfed by so Koko at the 2006 Pocono Blues Festival. Address all Correspondence to.... many devotees. Still trying, but I still Jazz & Blues Report Photo by Ron Weinstock.
    [Show full text]
  • Did You Receive This Copy of Jazzweek As a Pass Along?
    JazzWeek with airplay data powered by jazzweek.com • Feb. 6, 2006 Volume 2, Number 11 • $7.95 In This Issue: Surprises at Berklee 60th Anniversary Concert . 4 Classical Meets Jazz in JALC ‘Jazz Suite’ Debut . 5 ALJO Embarks On Tour . 8 News In Brief . 6 Reviews and Picks . 15 Jazz Radio . 18 Smooth Jazz Radio. 25 Industry Legend Radio Panels. 24, 29 BRUCE LUNDVALL News. 4 Part One of our Two-part Q&A: page 11 Charts: #1 Jazz Album – Jae Sinnett #1 Smooth Album – Richard Elliot #1 Smooth Single – Brian Simpson JazzWeek This Week EDITOR/PUBLISHER Ed Trefzger n part one of our two part interview with Bruce Lundvall, the MUSIC EDITOR Tad Hendrickson Blue Note president tells music editor Tad Hendrickson that Iin his opinion radio indeed does sell records. That’s the good CONTRIBUTING EDITORS news. Keith Zimmerman Kent Zimmerman But Lundvall points out something that many others have CONTRIBUTING WRITER/ pointed out in recent years: radio doesn’t make hits. As he tells Tad, PHOTOGRAPHER “When I was a kid I would hear a new release and they would play Tom Mallison it over and over again. Not like Top 40, but over a period of weeks PHOTOGRAPHY you’d hear a tune from the new Hank Mobley record. That’s not Barry Solof really happening much any more.” Lundvall understands the state Founding Publisher: Tony Gasparre of programming on mostly non-commercial jazz stations, and ac- ADVERTISING: Devon Murphy knowledges that kind of focused airplay doesn’t happen. Call (866) 453-6401 ext. 3 or This ties into my question of last week – does mainstream jazz email: [email protected] radio play too much music that’s only good, but not great? I’ve SUBSCRIPTIONS: received a few comments; please email me with your thoughts on Free to qualified applicants this at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace, Defense, and Government Services Mergers & Acquisitions
    Aerospace, Defense, and Government Services Mergers & Acquisitions (January 1993 - April 2020) Huntington BAE Spirit Booz Allen L3Harris Precision Rolls- Airbus Boeing CACI Perspecta General Dynamics GE Honeywell Leidos SAIC Leonardo Technologies Lockheed Martin Ingalls Northrop Grumman Castparts Safran Textron Thales Raytheon Technologies Systems Aerosystems Hamilton Industries Royce Airborne tactical DHPC Technologies L3Harris airport Kopter Group PFW Aerospace to Aviolinx Raytheon Unisys Federal Airport security Hydroid radio business to Hutchinson airborne tactical security businesses Vector Launch Otis & Carrier businesses BAE Systems Dynetics businesses to Leidos Controls & Data Premiair Aviation radios business Fiber Materials Maintenance to Shareholders Linndustries Services to Valsef United Raytheon MTM Robotics Next Century Leidos Health to Distributed Energy GERAC test lab and Technologies Inventory Locator Service to Shielding Specialities Jet Aviation Vienna PK AirFinance to ettain group Night Vision business Solutions business to TRC Base2 Solutions engineering to Sopemea 2 Alestis Aerospace to CAMP Systems International Hamble aerostructure to Elbit Systems Stormscope product eAircraft to Belcan 2 GDI Simulation to MBDA Deep3 Software Apollo and Athene Collins Psibernetix ElectroMechanical Aciturri Aeronautica business to Aernnova IMX Medical line to TransDigm J&L Fiber Services to 0 Knight Point Aerospace TruTrak Flight Systems ElectroMechanical Systems to Safran 0 Pristmatic Solutions Next Generation 911 to Management
    [Show full text]
  • Geoeye Corp Overview
    GeoEye See our World…Better than Ever 1 GeoEye Focus on Africa Ms. Andrea Cook Senior Sales Manager Middle East, Africa & India GeoEye GeoEye: Company Overview OfferingOffering bestbest resolutionresolution –– colorcolor –– accuracyaccuracy commerciallycommercially availableavailable 3 GeoEye: IKONOS and GeoEye-1 IKONOS – Launched 24 September 1999 – World’s first commercial satellite with 1- meter resolution • 0.82 meter panchromatic, 3.2 meters multi-spectral • Over 300 million km² of world-wide archive • Extensive global network of ground stations __________________________________________________________ GeoEye-1 – Launched 6 September 2008 – Started Commercial Operations 5 February 2009 – Most advanced satellite commercially available • 0.41 meter panchromatic, 1.65 multi- spectral • Designed for <5m accuracy without ground control • Up to 700,000 km² per day collection capacity (panchromatic) • >7 year mission life 4 IKONOS: 1 meter imagery AlmostAlmost 1010 yearsyears ofof archivearchive –– stillstill collectingcollecting strongstrong 5 GeoEye-1: First Images NowNow CommerciallyCommercially AvailableAvailable –– CollectingCollecting WorldWorld WideWide 6 GeoEye Constellation Collection Capacity Faster Response Times Faster Project Completions More Opportunities Served • GeoEye Constellation Collection Capacity – GeoEye-1 • Image 350,000 km2/day in multi-spectral mode • 700,000 sq km/day panchromatic mode – IKONOS • 150,000 sq km/day • True Constellation Operations for GeoEye-1 and IKONOS – Phased orbit Key: – Access to all locations
    [Show full text]
  • Spectral Response for Digitalglobe Earth Imaging Instruments
    Spectral Response for DigitalGlobe Earth Imaging Instruments IKONOS The IKONOS satellite carries a high resolution panchromatic band covering most of the silicon response and four lower resolution spectral bands. The four multispectral bands are roughly based on four bands used on the Landsat satellite series, including blue, green, red and near-infrared. The spectral responses of the bands are shown in Figure 1, individually normalized to the maximum value. Table 1 gives the 5% response upper and lower edges and center wavelengths for each. Figure1. Spectral Response of the IKONOS panchromatic and multispectral imagery. Table 1. IKONOS Spectral Band Edges and Center Wavelengths Band Name Center Lower Band Upper Band Edge Wavelength Edge (nm) (nm) (nm) Panchromatic 729 409 1048 Blue 480 421 539 Green 552 480 624 Red 666 602 729 NIR 803 713 893 2 QuickBird The QuickBird satellite also carries a high resolution panchromatic band covering most of the silicon response and four lower resolution spectral bands. The spectral responses of the bands are shown in Figure 2, individually normalized to the maximum value. Table 2 gives the 5% response upper and lower edges and center wavelengths for each. QuickBird Relative Spectral Radiance Response 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 Panchromatic Blue 0.6 Green Red NIR 0.5 0.4 Relative Response Relative 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 350 450 550 650 750 850 950 1050 Wavelength (nm) Figure 2. Spectral Response of the QuickBird panchromatic and multispectral imagery. Table 2. QuickBird Spectral Band Edges and Center Wavelengths Band Name Center Lower Band Upper Band Edge Wavelength Edge (nm) (nm) (nm) Panchromatic 729 405 1053 Blue 488 430 545 Green 543 466 620 Red 650 590 710 NIR 817 715 918 3 WorldView-1 The WorldView-1 satellite carries a panchromatic only instrument to produce basic black and white imagery for users who do not require color information.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL Call for Papers & Registration of Interest
    ORGANIZED BY: HOSTED BY: st 71 INTERNATIONAL ASTRONAUTICAL CONGRESS 12–16 October 2020 | Dubai, United Arab Emirates Call for Papers & Registration of Interest Second Announcement SUPPORTED BY: Inspire, Innovate & Discover for the Benefit of Humankind IAC2020.ORG Contents 1. Message from the International Astronautical Federation (IAF) 2 2. Message from the Local Organizing Committee 2 3. Message from the IPC Co-Chairs 3 4. Messages from the Partner Organizations 4 5. International Astronautical Federation (IAF) 5 6. International Academy of Astronautics (IAA) 10 7. International Institute of Space Law (IISL) 11 8. Message from the IAF Vice President for Technical Activities 12 9. IAC 2020 Technical Sessions Deadlines Calendar 49 10. Preliminary IAC 2020 at a Glance 50 11. Instructions to Authors 51 Connecting @ll Space People 12. Space in the United Arab Emirates 52 www.iafastro.org IAF Alliance Programme Partners 2019 1 71st IAC International Astronautical Congress 12–16 October 2020, Dubai 1. Message from the International Astronautical Federation (IAF) 3. Message from the International Programme Committee (IPC) Greetings! Co-Chairs It is our great pleasure to invite you to the 71st International Astronautical Congress (IAC) to take place in Dubai, United Arab Emirates On behalf of the International Programme Committee, it is a great pleasure to invite you to submit an abstract for the 71st International from 12 – 16 October 2020. Astronautical Congress IAC 2020 that will be held in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. The IAC is an initiative to bring scientists, practitioners, engineers and leaders of space industry and agencies together in a single platform to discuss recent research breakthroughs, technical For the very first time, the IAC will open its doors to the global space community in the United Arab Emirates, the first Arab country to advances, existing opportunities and emerging space technologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Profile
    2013 : Epsilon Launch Vehicle 2009 : International Space Station 1997 : M-V Launch Vehicle 1955 : The First Launched Pencil Rocket Corporate Profile Looking Ahead to Future Progress IHI Aerospace (IA) is carrying out the development, manufacture, and sales of rocket projectiles, and has been contributing in a big way to the indigenous space development in Japan. We started research on rocket projectiles in 1953. Now we have become a leading comprehensive manufacturer carrying out development and manufacture of rocket projectiles in Japan, and are active in a large number of fields such as rockets for scientific observation, rockets for launching practical satellites, and defense-related systems, etc. In the space science field, we cooperate with the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) to develop and manufacture various types of observational rockets named K (Kappa), L (Lambda), and S (Sounding), and the M (Mu) rockets. With the M rockets, we have contributed to the launch of many scientific satellites. In 2013, efforts resulted in the successful launch of an Epsilon Rocket prototype, a next-generation solid rocket which inherited the 2 technologies of all the aforementioned rockets. In the practical satellite booster rocket field, We cooperates with the JAXA and has responsibilities in the solid propellant field including rocket boosters, upper-stage motors in development of the N, H-I, H-II, and H-IIA H-IIB rockets. We have also achieved excellent results in development of rockets for material experiments and recovery systems, as well as the development of equipment for use in a space environment or experimentation. In the defense field, we have developed and manufactured a variety of rocket systems and rocket motors for guided missiles, playing an important role in Japanese defense.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Socio-Technical Issues Affecting the Current Microgravity Research Marketplace
    Understanding Socio-Technical Issues Affecting the Current Microgravity Research Marketplace The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Joseph, Christine and Danielle Wood. "Understanding Socio- Technical Issues Affecting the Current Microgravity Research Marketplace." 2019 IEEE Aerospace Conference, March 2019, Big Sky, Montana, USA, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, June 2019. © 2019 IEEE As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/aero.2019.8742202 Publisher Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Version Author's final manuscript Citable link https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/131219 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Understanding Socio-Technical Issues Affecting the Current Microgravity Research Marketplace Christine Joseph Danielle Wood Massachusetts Institute of Technology Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Ave 77 Massachusetts Ave Cambridge, MA 02139 Cambridge, MA 02139 [email protected] [email protected] Abstract— For decades, the International Space Station (ISS) 1. INTRODUCTION has operated as a bastion of international cooperation and a unique testbed for microgravity research. Beyond enabling For anyone who is a teenager in October 2019, the insights into human physiology in space, the ISS has served as a International Space Station has been in operation and hosted microgravity platform for numerous science experiments. In humans for the entirety of that person’s life. The platform has recent years, private industry has also been affiliating with hosted a diverse spectrum of microgravity, human space NASA and international partners to offer transportation, exploration, technology demonstration, and education related logistics management, and payload demands.
    [Show full text]
  • SHOW DAILY SHOW Aug
    Aug. 8, 2019 • Visit us at 239T DAY 3 SHOW DAILY OFFICIAL SHOW DAILY OF THE 33RD AIAA/USU CONFERENCE ON SMALL SATELLITES NASA seeking proposals for cubesats on second SLS launch ASA is soliciting proposals to fly cubesats on the second flight of its Space Launch N System, even as those cubesats chosen for the first SLS launch patiently await their ride. At an agency town hall meeting during the Conference on Small Satellites Aug. 5, Renee Cox, deputy manager for SLS payload integration at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center, said the agency was planning to fly cubesats on Artemis 2, the second flight of the SLS, tentatively sched- uled for 2022. “Recently we achieved a level of maturity that has allowed us to identify performance margin, so that means we get to fly cubesats,” she said of the decision to add cubesats to the mission. NASA announced in 2016 it would fly 13 cubesats on the first SLS mission, originally called Explora- tion Mission (EM) 1 and renamed Artemis 1 earlier this year. Those satellites include NASA-funded science and technology demonstration missions, payloads from international partners and compet- itors in the Cube Quest Challenge competition. As with the Artemis 1 mission, the cubesats flying on Artemis 2 will be mounted on the inside of a stage adapter ring between the SLS upper stage and the Orion spacecraft, and will be de- Renee Cox, deputy manager for SLS payload integration, at SmallSat on Wednesday holds a model of an adapter ployed after Orion separates. Unlike Artemis 1, ring that can accomodate six-unit and 12-unit cubesats between the SLS upper stage and Orion spacecraft.
    [Show full text]
  • JAXA Launches Its First Startup-Built Satellite RAPIS-1 & 6 Other Satellites
    JAXA launches its first startup-built satellite RAPIS-1 & 6 other satellites By Deyana Goh - January 21, 2019 “RAPIS-1” (RAPid Innovative payload demonstration Satellite 1), a small satellite commissioned by Japan’s space agency JAXA and designed and operated by newspace startup Axelspace was successfully launched from the Uchinoura Space Center in Kagoshima Prefecture, Japan at 9:50 AM of January 18th, 2019. The 200-kg satellite was launched by JAXA’s light launch vehicle, Epsilon-4, along with six other microsatellites and cubesats. The successful separation of RAPIS-1 was confirmed about 50 minutes after launch. RAPIS-1 is part of JAXA’s Innovative Satellite Technology Demonstration Program, an initiative to provide in-orbit validation opportunities to external entities, with the objective of strengthening the technologies behind core satellite components. The Japanese Government’s space program has scheduled four demonstration launch opportunities, one every two years. This launch represents the first of these four and is termed “Innovative Satellite Technology Demonstration-1”, and carries seven demonstration experiments. These demonstrations are: Testing the space environment tolerance of a field-programmable gate array (FGPA), by NEC 2-3 Gbps X-band downlink in-orbit demonstration by Keio University Green Propellant Reaction Control System (GPRCS) by Japan Space Systems Space Particle Monitor (SPM) by Japan Space Systems Deep learning attitude sensor/star tracker by Tokyo Institute of Technology Light-weight solar panel apparatus by JAXA Miniaturized low-power GNSS receiver by Chubu University So far, the RAPIS-1’s critical operation phase has been passed, and the satellite has begun performing check-out operations on all the on-board components which is likely to last a month.
    [Show full text]