DOCSLIB.ORG

Dr Michael Herrin OK Dept of Agriculture Animal Industy Services

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dr Michael Herrin OK Dept of Agriculture Animal Industy Services HATCHERIES, DEALERS, AND INDEPENDENT FLOCKS PARTICIPATING IN THE NATIONAL POULTRY IMPROVMENT PLAN MULTIPLIER MEAT-TYPE CHICKEN BREEDING FLOCKS NPIP. HATCHING PRODUCTS CLASSIFIED ADDITIONAL NO. SUBPART PARTICIPANTS NAME AND ADDRESS EGG U.S. PULLORUM-TYPHOID CLASSIFICATIONS FOR CAPACITY CLEAN WHICH PRODUCTS QUALFIED 73 - Oklahoma Dr Michael Herrin Mr Dee Hillirard OK Dept of Agriculture Ok Dept of Agriculture Animal Industy Services Animal Industry Services Oklahoma City, OK 73152 Oklahoma City, OK 73152 Phone: 405-522-6142 Fax:405-522-0756 Phone: 918-787-1490 [email protected] [email protected] Hatchery Farm/company Cobb Vantress, Grand Meadows 41013 S. P/T 2275 C 490 Road Spavinaw, OK 74366 94200 T3 CLEAN MG MS SAN Phone: MON Cobb-Vantress, Sweetwater Research Facility Cobb-Vantress, 3718 N 475 3029 C T P/T CLEAN Rd Rose, OK 74364 Phone: Cobb-Vantress, Three Springs P/T Hatchery 17804 E 606 Road Rose, 2145 C 126240 T19 CLEAN MG MS SAN OK 74364 MON Phone: OK Farms, Heavener Hatchery 21 Dutchman 557 C Road Heavener, OK 74937 3849120 T19 T9 P/T CLEAN MSM MGM Phone: Ok Farms, Stigler Hatchery PO Box 1694 C 119 Stigler, OK 74462 1632960 T19 T9 P/T CLEAN MSM MGM Phone: Tyson Foods, Broken Bow Hatchery Rt. 4 482 C Box 370 Broken Bow, OK 74728 5080320 T P/T CLEAN AI CLEAN Phone: Tyson, Stillwell Hatchery RR 6 Box 1512 C 365 Stillwell, OK 74960 5715360 T1 T19 T3 T9 P/T CLEAN AI CLEAN Phone: Independent Flocks Farm/company OK Farms, Stillwell PO BOX P/T 1837 C 119 STIGLER, OK 74462 T3 T19 CLEAN MS MG Phone: HATCHERIES, DEALERS, AND INDEPENDENT FLOCKS PARTICIPATING IN THE NATIONAL POULTRY IMPROVMENT PLAN HOBBYIST & EXHIBITION WATERFOWL, EXHIBITION POULTRY, & GAME BIRD BREEDING FLOCKS NPIP. HATCHING PRODUCTS CLASSIFIED ADDITIONAL NO. SUBPART PARTICIPANTS NAME AND ADDRESS EGG U.S. PULLORUM-TYPHOID CLASSIFICATIONS FOR CAPACITY CLEAN WHICH PRODUCTS QUALFIED 73 - Oklahoma Dr Michael Herrin Mr Dee Hillirard OK Dept of Agriculture Ok Dept of Agriculture Animal Industy Services Animal Industry Services Oklahoma City, OK 73152 Oklahoma City, OK 73152 Phone: 405-522-6142 Fax:405-522-0756 Phone: 918-787-1490 [email protected] [email protected] Hatchery Farm/company Blum, Christine 27042 County Rd 1410 Cement, P/T 3289 E OK 73017 600 W W573 W578 Z4 CLEAN Phone: BOWMAN, LAURA Bowman, Laura 9401 P/T 3007 E Arrowhead Circle Norman, OK 73026 R18 R146 Z204 W8 R19 CLEAN Phone: CLIFTON, KARLA Clifton, Karla Rt 1 Box P/T 3049 E 104 Soper, OK 74759 560 W30 W86 CLEAN Phone: Country Hatchery Smith, Dennis PO Box P/T 67 E 747 Wewoka, OK 74884 R229 W2 CLEAN Phone: H&H Poultry Leopard, John Rt. 1 Box P/T 2998 E 13907 Warner, OK 74469 R229 CLEAN Phone: High Hopes Acres Williams, Gene Rt 1 Box P/T 2906 E 167 Crescent, OK 73028 W7 W25 W69 W26 CLEAN Phone: LOVE, MELVIN Love, Melvin Rt 1 Box 169 P/T 3084 E A Cyril, OK 73029 W2 CLEAN Phone: Miller Game Birds Crissup, Teary & Tracy 2711 P/T 2126 E N. 2810 RD Hennessey, OK 73742 Z27 Z88 Z1 CLEAN Phone: NEUGIN, JERRY Neugin, Jerry 40343 Old Pike P/T 3247 E Rd Howe, OK 74940 Z231 CLEAN Phone: Paw Prints Suhm, June 214 N Service Rd Moore, P/T 3086 E OK 73160 42 W660 CLEAN Phone: PEPPER, BOBBY Pepper, Bobby 13630 S MW P/T 3232 E BLVD Edmond, OK 73034 4800 R7 Z43 X4 X3 CLEAN Phone: Walter'S Hatchery Inc. Walters, Arlus Rt 3 Box P/T 2637 E 1410 Stilwell, OK 74960 198 Z201 Z182 Z219 Z230 Z205 CLEAN Phone: Z204 Z202 Z206 Z209 YOUNGER, WILLIAM R. (RANDY) Younger, Z62 R7 R225 R24 Z206 William R. (Randy) HC 64 Box 3907 Eufaula, P/T 3001 E 1488 OK 74432 Z202 R36 Z4 R213 R233 CLEAN Phone: R31 HATCHERIES, DEALERS, AND INDEPENDENT FLOCKS PARTICIPATING IN THE NATIONAL POULTRY IMPROVMENT PLAN HOBBYIST & EXHIBITION WATERFOWL, EXHIBITION POULTRY, & GAME BIRD BREEDING FLOCKS NPIP. HATCHING PRODUCTS CLASSIFIED ADDITIONAL NO. SUBPART PARTICIPANTS NAME AND ADDRESS EGG U.S. PULLORUM-TYPHOID CLASSIFICATIONS FOR CAPACITY CLEAN WHICH PRODUCTS QUALFIED 73 - Oklahoma Independent Flocks Participants Francis, Karson 7810 S 13th St P/T 3330 E E Muskogee, OK 74403 W48 W74 X25 X4 CLEAN Phone: 918-681-0736 Gates, Emma E 12384 E 470 Rd Salina, P/T 3335 E OK 74365 W20 W25 W742 CLEAN Phone: 918-434-5599 Greenwood, Kathy 3034 S 4390 P/T 3336 E Rd Vinita , OK 74301 W X Y CLEAN Phone: 918-815-3931 Holmes, Loralee 6451 E Waterloo P/T 3339 E Rd Edmond, OK 73034 W3 W13 W94 CLEAN Phone: 316-522-6494 Jett, Andy 437703 E 340 Rd Big Cabin, P/T 3337 E OK 74332 W CLEAN Phone: 918-230-5577 Masters, Jack 302 W 41st Sand P/T 3338 E Springs, OK 74063 W1 W132 CLEAN Phone: 918-245-2827 Russell, Bill 27458 Blue Ridge St Leon, P/T 3332 E OK 73441 R183 Z231 Z41 CLEAN Phone: 580-504-9348 Farm/company 4-E Family Farm 1664 N. Country Cllub Newcastle, P/T 3174 E OK 73068 W52 CLEAN Phone: 8Th Street Hen House Utterback, Frank & Darla 1031 P/T 1847 E 8th Alva, OK 73717 W20 CLEAN Phone: A&R Bantams Richmond-Austin, Kristi 508 P/T 3207 E Crestdale Noble, OK 73068 W89 W88 W28 CLEAN Phone: ACKER, ROBERT & SHERRY Acker, Robert & P/T 3266 E Sherry 13405 Hwy 102 Shawnee, OK 74804 W CLEAN Phone: AKEHURST, DANNY Akehurst, Danny Rt 1 Box P/T 2986 E 1155 Haskell, OK 74436 X10 Y2 X99 Y4 W132 CLEAN Phone: Allen, Darrin, D&D Yard Birds 7801 E Smith 3312 E Ferry Muskogee, OK 74403 A W X Y Z Phone: AMMERMAN, TYLER Ammerman, Tyler 615 Turner P/T 3240 E Rd Nowata, OK 74048 N19 W2 W3 CLEAN Phone: Anderson, Bernard & Ambre 801 S Arena Rd McLoud, HATCHERIES, DEALERS, AND INDEPENDENT FLOCKS PARTICIPATING IN THE NATIONAL POULTRY IMPROVMENT PLAN HOBBYIST & EXHIBITION WATERFOWL, EXHIBITION POULTRY, & GAME BIRD BREEDING FLOCKS NPIP. HATCHING PRODUCTS CLASSIFIED ADDITIONAL NO. SUBPART PARTICIPANTS NAME AND ADDRESS EGG U.S. PULLORUM-TYPHOID CLASSIFICATIONS FOR CAPACITY CLEAN WHICH PRODUCTS QUALFIED 73 - Oklahoma Anderson, Bernard & Ambre 801 S Arena Rd McLoud, P/T 3272 E OK 74851 R44 W190 X CLEAN Phone: ANDROES, STEVEN C Androes, Steven C 1407 P/T 3048 E Country Club Dr Perry, OK 73077 W6 CLEAN Phone: B & P Bantams 4610 South Vian, OK 74962 P/T 3255 E W2 Phone: CLEAN B&D Game Farm Tumey, Bert & Diane PO Box P/T 274 E 812 Harrah, OK 73045 CLEAN Phone: BAILEY, BILLY J Bailey, Billy J 11832 Hwy P/T 3037 E 82 Tahlequah, OK 74464 R247 W48 W164 W69 W88 CLEAN Phone: W120 R277 W18 W17 W60 BAILEY, CHARLES Bailey, Charles 348903 E. 1060 P/T 3157 E Rd Prague, OK 74864 N32 N41 N121 N167 N152 CLEAN Phone: BARBER, W. L. Barber, W. L. 1010 W P/T 1631 E Choctaw Lindsay, OK 73052 W136 CLEAN Phone: BARDSHER, CARL Bardsher, Carl 1602 Combs P/T 1759 E Rd Lawton, OK 73501 N37 N28 N44 CLEAN Phone: BARNARD, BOBBY Barnard, Bobby PO Box P/T 3205 E 35 Wainwright, OK 74468 R678 CLEAN Phone: BARNARD, JASON Barnard, Jason PO Box P/T 3206 E 181 Wainwright, OK 74468 R678 CLEAN Phone: Barnes Bantams Barnes, Andy Joe Rt 2 Box P/T 256 E 450 Comanche, OK 73529 W28 W88 CLEAN Phone: BARNETT, "CHEPARNEY ""DOLLY""" Barnett, "Cheparney ""Dolly""" 3120 E Davis Field P/T 857 E X Y Z Rd Muskogee, OK 74403 CLEAN Phone: Bates, Tony 9110 Leavenworth Tr Mead, OK 73449 P/T 3308 E W Phone: CLEAN Bedford, Shannon 10950 S 4080 Rd Oologah, OK 74053 P/T 3293 E R44 R7 Phone: CLEAN BEEKS, WILLARD Beeks, Willard Rt 3 Box P/T 3076 E 1125 Stilwell, OK 74960 N18 CLEAN Phone: BERRY, LISA Berry, Lisa RR 1 Box 945 Checotah, P/T 3193 E OK 74426 W295 R116 Z204 Z252 W57 CLEAN Phone: BESSER, RICHARD L Besser, Richard L 433 S. P/T 2941 E Blacksmith Rd Cleveland, OK 74020 N104 R48 W511 W48 W50 CLEAN Phone: BLACK, PETER E Black, Peter E Rt 1 Box 119 Roff, HATCHERIES, DEALERS, AND INDEPENDENT FLOCKS PARTICIPATING IN THE NATIONAL POULTRY IMPROVMENT PLAN HOBBYIST & EXHIBITION WATERFOWL, EXHIBITION POULTRY, & GAME BIRD BREEDING FLOCKS NPIP. HATCHING PRODUCTS CLASSIFIED ADDITIONAL NO. SUBPART PARTICIPANTS NAME AND ADDRESS EGG U.S. PULLORUM-TYPHOID CLASSIFICATIONS FOR CAPACITY CLEAN WHICH PRODUCTS QUALFIED 73 - Oklahoma BLACK, PETER E Black, Peter E Rt 1 Box 119 Roff, P/T 2683 E OK 74865 R222 W30 W35 CLEAN Phone: BLAIN, BENNY Blain, Benny 2720 Ulan P/T 3190 E Rd Mcalester, OK 74501 Z252 Z204 N11 W293 CLEAN Phone: BLAIR, CARAH/MADISON Blair, P/T 3132 E Carah/Madison 2619 S 71St E Muskogee, OK 74403 W2 R229 CLEAN Phone: BLAKLEY, GERALD Blakley, Gerald 903 N. H P/T 3017 E Street Cement, OK 73017 W57 W20 CLEAN Phone: BLAKLEY, SHERRI A Blakley, Sherri A 157 P/T 3041 E Whispering Oaks Mead, OK 73449 R247 R7 R222 R94 CLEAN Phone: Bowtie Ranch & Alpaca Farm Maness, Patti 518 SW P/T 3234 E 27th Place Newcastle, OK 73065 R229 W2 CLEAN Phone: BRADEN, BILLY B Braden, Billy B PO Box P/T 2780 E 182 Salina, OK 74365 W518 R22 R213 CLEAN Phone: Bradwell, Milo 13600 Spruce Valley Dr Jones, P/T 3325 E OK 73049 W132 Z14 Z4 CLEAN Phone: BRANDSTADT, DON Brandstadt, Don 1643 Mossy P/T 3223 E Lake Rd Bennington, OK 74723 R12 Z204 CLEAN Phone: BRANNON, TRAVIS Brannon, Travis PO Box P/T 3064 E 1081 Chouteau, OK 74337 W578 W16 W573 CLEAN Phone: BRAZIEL, JERRY Braziel, Jerry 1312 S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • This Is a Converted File. Please Check Before Making the Next Change
    OEM: When controller is mounted, discard either Table 151 or Table 154 before attaching lower portion of the instruction sheet to your equipment. Table 151 should remain when the controller is mounted in a small enclusure(a volume of 860 cubic inches or less), or in the proximity of heat producing components which have the same effect as a small enclosure. Select Table 154 for use on open panels or in very large enclosures. BULLETIN 520, SIZE 2, 3-PHASE, heater Table 151 element selection table for controllers with Table 154 two Bulletin 592 3-pole overload relays. Heater Full Heater Full Type Load WARNING:To provide continued protec- Type Load No. Amps. tion against fire or shock hazard, the No. Amps. complete overload relay must be replaced W50 8.45 if burnout of any heater element occurs. W50 8.58 W51 9.32 W51 9.48 W52 10.3 W52 10.6 W53 11.3 IMPORTANT: When ordering heater W53 11.7 W54 12.3 elements for this controller, always specify W54 12.8 W55 13.4 the desired “Heater Type No.’ W55 14.1 W56 14.5 W56 15.4 W57 15.8 Motors Rated for Continuous Duty with W57 16.9 W58 16.7 Marked Service Factor Not Less Than 1.15 or W58 18.3 W59 18.1 Marked Temperature Rise Not Over 40°C. W59 19.9 W60 20.0 Select the ”Heater Type No.” with the listed W60 21.9 W61 22.0 “Full Load Amps.” nearest the full load W61 24.2 W62 24.5 current value shown on the motor W62 26.8 W63 27.3 nameplate when the ambient temperature W63 29.6 W64 29.2 at the controller and the motor is the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Thierry Moreau
    Compilation and Hardware Support for Approximate Acceleration Thierry Moreau, Adrian Sampson, Andre Baixo, Mark Wyse, Ben Ransford, Jacob Nelson, Hadi Esmaeilzadeh (Georgia Tech), Luis Ceze and Mark Oskin University of Washington [email protected] Theme: 2384.004 1 Thierry Moreau Approximate Computing Aims to exploit application resilience to trade-off quality for efficiency 2 Thierry Moreau Approximate Computing 3 Thierry Moreau Approximate Computing ✅ Accurate ✅ Approximate ❌ Expensive ✅ Cheap 4 Thierry Moreau 5 Thierry Moreau 6 Thierry Moreau 7 Thierry Moreau Neural Networks as Approximate Accelerators CPU Esmaeilzadeh et al. [MICRO 2012] 8 Thierry Moreau Neural Acceleration float foo (float a, float b) { AR F … NPUM P G return val; approximation acceleration } 9 Thierry Moreau Neural Acceleration compiler-support float foo (float a, float b) { AR F … NPUM P G return val; approximation acceleration } ACCEPT* *Sampson et. al [UW-TR] 10 Thierry Moreau Neural Acceleration compiler-support HW-support float foo (float a, float b) { AR F … NPUM P G return val; approximation acceleration } ACCEPT SNNAP* *Moreau et. al [HPCA2015] 11 Thierry Moreau Neural Acceleration compiler-support HW-support float foo (float a, float b) { AR F … NPUM P G return val; approximation acceleration } ACCEPT SNNAP 3.8x speedup and 2.8x efficiency - 10% error 12 Thierry Moreau Talk Outline Introduction Compiler Support with ACCEPT SNNAP Accelerator design Evaluation & Comparison with HLS 13 Thierry Moreau Compilation Overview code 1. Region detection annotation 14 Thierry Moreau Compilation Overview ACCEPT code region detection 1. Region detection & program annotation instrumentation 15 Thierry Moreau Compilation Overview ACCEPT code region detection 1. Region detection & program annotation instrumentation back prop.
    [Show full text]
  • Heater Element Specifications Bulletin Number 592
    Technical Data Heater Element Specifications Bulletin Number 592 Topic Page Description 2 Heater Element Selection Procedure 2 Index to Heater Element Selection Tables 5 Heater Element Selection Tables 6 Additional Resources These documents contain additional information concerning related products from Rockwell Automation. Resource Description Industrial Automation Wiring and Grounding Guidelines, publication 1770-4.1 Provides general guidelines for installing a Rockwell Automation industrial system. Product Certifications website, http://www.ab.com Provides declarations of conformity, certificates, and other certification details. You can view or download publications at http://www.rockwellautomation.com/literature/. To order paper copies of technical documentation, contact your local Allen-Bradley distributor or Rockwell Automation sales representative. For Application on Bulletin 100/500/609/1200 Line Starters Heater Element Specifications Eutectic Alloy Overload Relay Heater Elements Type J — CLASS 10 Type P — CLASS 20 (Bul. 600 ONLY) Type W — CLASS 20 Type WL — CLASS 30 Note: Heater Element Type W/WL does not currently meet the material Type W Heater Elements restrictions related to EU ROHS Description The following is for motors rated for Continuous Duty: For motors with marked service factor of not less than 1.15, or Overload Relay Class Designation motors with a marked temperature rise not over +40 °C United States Industry Standards (NEMA ICS 2 Part 4) designate an (+104 °F), apply application rules 1 through 3. Apply application overload relay by a class number indicating the maximum time in rules 2 and 3 when the temperature difference does not exceed seconds at which it will trip when carrying a current equal to 600 +10 °C (+18 °F).
    [Show full text]
  • K-12 Individual No. Name Team Gr Rate Pts Tbrk1 Tbrk2 Tbrk3 Tbrk4
    K-12 Individual No. Name Team Gr Rate Pts TBrk1 TBrk2 TBrk3 TBrk4 Rnd1 Rnd2 Rnd3 Rnd4 Rnd5 Rnd6 1 Chakraborty, Dipro 11 2299 5.5 21 24 43 20.5 W27 W12 W5 W32 W8 D3 State Champion, AZ Denker Representative 2 Yim, Tony Sung BASISS 8 2135 5 20.5 23.5 38.5 17.5 W24 W10 D3 D16 W11 W9 3 Aletheia-Zomlefer, Soren CHANPR 11 1961 5 20 23 35.5 18.5 W25 W26 D2 W40 W15 D1 4 Desmarais, Nicholas Eduard NOTRED 10 1917 5 18 20 33 18 W39 W23 W18 L15 W10 W8 5 Wong, Kinsleigh Phillip CFHS 10 1992 4.5 20 20 24.5 15 -X- W17 L1 W26 D7 W15 6 Todd, Bryce BASISC 10 1923 4.5 17 19 26.5 14.5 W38 D18 L9 W23 W21 W16 7 Chaliki, Kalyan DSMTHS 9 1726 4.5 17 18.5 26 15 W46 L16 W28 W22 D5 W17 8 Li, Bohan UHS 9 2048 4 22 25 29 18 W30 W11 W45 W9 L1 L4 9 Mittal, Rohan CFHS 9 1916 4 19.5 20.5 23 17 W47 W22 W6 L8 W20 L2 10 Pennock, Joshua CFHS 10 1682 4 19 22 24 14 W31 L2 W25 W21 L4 W29 11 Aradhyula, Sumhith CFHS 9 1631 4 18 20 22 14 W41 L8 W38 W13 L2 W19 12 Johnston, Nicolas Godfrey CFHS 9 1803 4 18 19.5 21 13 W43 L1 W29 L17 W24 W20 13 Martis, Tyler BRHS 12 1787 4 17 18 21 13 W42 L15 W24 L11 W18 W22 14 Plumb, Justin Rodney GCLACA 10 1700 4 16 17 20 13 W51 L32 W19 L20 W28 W27 15 Martinez, Isaac GLPREP 10 2159 3.5 21.5 24.5 27.5 16 W28 W13 D16 W4 L3 L5 16 Chen, Derek H CFHS 10 1965 3.5 21 23.5 26 15.5 W35 W7 D15 D2 D17 L6 17 Woodson, Tyler GILBHS 1640 3.5 19 19 17.5 14 W50 L5 W30 W12 D16 L7 18 Cancio, Aiya CFHS 9 1469 3.5 18.5 20 17.5 12.5 W36 D6 L4 W46 L13 W25 AZ Girls' Invitational Representative 19 Folden, Kurt CHANPR 10 1207 3 14 18 12 10 L32 W50 L14 W31 W23 L11 20 Thornton,
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Report Department of Energy Implementation Plan For
    October 29, 1996, DOE forwards Quarterly Report (for the period July 1 ... http://www.hss.doe.gov/deprep/1996-2/qr96o29c.htm Quarterly Report Department of Energy Implementation Plan for Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Recommendation 93-6 Maintaining Access to Nuclear Weapons Expertise Reporting Period July 1 through September 30, 1996 Table of Contents Section Title 1.0 Commitment Status 2.0 Activities 2.1 Pantex 2.2 Y-12 2.3 Nevada 2.4 Archiving 3.0 Meetings 2 Attachments: Summary of 93-6 Archiving Televideo Conference conducted on July 23, 1996 Summary of 93-6 Archiving Televideo Conference conducted on September 16, 1996 1.0 Deliverable Status Deliverable Due Date Status Remarks A.1.A Feb 29, 1996 Complete Deliverable provided to DNFSB on March 26, 1996. A.1.B May 30, 1996 Complete W69 provided to the DNFSB on May 7, 1996. W56 WSS provided to the DNFSB on August 12, 1996. A.2 May 31, 1996 Complete Deliverable provided to DNFSB on August 27, 1996. A.3 Feb 29, 1996 Complete Deliverable provided to DNFSB on January 24, 1996. B.1 Jan 31, 1996 Complete Deliverable provided to DNFSB on February 2, 1996. 1 of 18 7/1/2011 10:38 AM October 29, 1996, DOE forwards Quarterly Report (for the period July 1 ... http://www.hss.doe.gov/deprep/1996-2/qr96o29c.htm B.2 Sep 30, 1996 Complete Deliverable provided to DNFSB on October 28, 1996. C.1 Jan 31, 1996 Complete Deliverable provided to DNFSB on February 2, 1996. D.1 Jan 31, 1996 Complete Deliverable provided to DNFSB on February 2, 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Experience a Lower Total Cost of Ownership
    EXPERIENCE A LOWER TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP Timken® Spherical Roller Bearings are engineered to give you more of what you need. Lower Operating Temperatures Rollers are guided by cage pockets—not a center guide ring—eliminating a friction point and resulting in 4–10% less rotational torque and 5ºC lower operating temperatures.* Less rotational torque leads to improved efficiency, lower energy consumption and more savings. Lower temperatures reduce the oil oxidation rate by 50% to extend lubricant life. Tougher Protection Hardened steel cages deliver greater fatigue strength, increased wear resistance and tougher protection against shock and acceleration. Optimized Uptime Unique slots in the cage face improve oil flow and purge more contaminants from the bearing to help extend equipment uptime. Minimized Wear Improved profiles reduce internal stresses and optimize load distribution to minimize wear. Improved Lube Film Enhanced surface finishes avoid metal-to-metal contact to reduce friction and result in improved lube film. Higher Loads Longer rollers result in 4–8% higher load ratings or 14–29% longer predicted bearing life. Higher load ratings enable you to carry heavier loads. Brass Cages Available in all sizes; ready when you need extra strength and durability in the most unrelenting conditions, including extreme shock and vibration, high acceleration forces, and minimal lubrication. Increase your operational efficiencies and extend maintenance intervals. Starting now. Visit Timken.com/spherical to find out more. *All results are from head-to-head
    [Show full text]
  • Bob Farquhar
    1 2 Created by Bob Farquhar For and dedicated to my grandchildren, their children, and all humanity. This is Copyright material 3 Table of Contents Preface 4 Conclusions 6 Gadget 8 Making Bombs Tick 15 ‘Little Boy’ 25 ‘Fat Man’ 40 Effectiveness 49 Death By Radiation 52 Crossroads 55 Atomic Bomb Targets 66 Acheson–Lilienthal Report & Baruch Plan 68 The Tests 71 Guinea Pigs 92 Atomic Animals 96 Downwinders 100 The H-Bomb 109 Nukes in Space 119 Going Underground 124 Leaks and Vents 132 Turning Swords Into Plowshares 135 Nuclear Detonations by Other Countries 147 Cessation of Testing 159 Building Bombs 161 Delivering Bombs 178 Strategic Bombers 181 Nuclear Capable Tactical Aircraft 188 Missiles and MIRV’s 193 Naval Delivery 211 Stand-Off & Cruise Missiles 219 U.S. Nuclear Arsenal 229 Enduring Stockpile 246 Nuclear Treaties 251 Duck and Cover 255 Let’s Nuke Des Moines! 265 Conclusion 270 Lest We Forget 274 The Beginning or The End? 280 Update: 7/1/12 Copyright © 2012 rbf 4 Preface 5 Hey there, I’m Ralph. That’s my dog Spot over there. Welcome to the not-so-wonderful world of nuclear weaponry. This book is a journey from 1945 when the first atomic bomb was detonated in the New Mexico desert to where we are today. It’s an interesting and sometimes bizarre journey. It can also be horribly frightening. Today, there are enough nuclear weapons to destroy the civilized world several times over. Over 23,000. “Enough to make the rubble bounce,” Winston Churchill said. The United States alone has over 10,000 warheads in what’s called the ‘enduring stockpile.’ In my time, we took care of things Mano-a-Mano.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Weapons
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees November 2018 NUCLEAR WEAPONS NNSA Has Taken Steps to Prepare to Restart a Program to Replace the W78 Warhead Capability GAO-19-84 November 2018 NUCLEAR WEAPONS NNSA Has Taken Steps to Prepare to Restart a Program to Replace the W78 Warhead Capability Highlights of GAO-19-84, a report to congressional committees Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found The Department of Defense and NNSA The Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) have sought for nearly a decade to has taken steps to prepare to restart a life extension program (LEP) to replace replace the capabilities of the aging the capabilities of the Air Force’s W78 nuclear warhead—a program which was W78 nuclear warhead used by the U.S. previously suspended. According to NNSA officials, these steps are typically Air Force. NNSA undertakes LEPs to needed to conduct any LEP. Therefore, they can be undertaken despite the refurbish or replace the capabilities of current uncertainty about whether the final program will develop the warhead for nuclear weapons components. In fiscal the Air Force only or for both the Air Force and the Navy. Specifically, NNSA has year 2014, NNSA was directed to taken the steps described below: suspend a program that was evaluating a capability that could • Program management. NNSA has begun to establish the program replace the W78 and also be used by management functions needed to execute a W78 replacement program, as the U.S. Navy. NNSA’s most recent required by NNSA’s program execution instruction.
    [Show full text]
  • Gao-20-703, Nuclear Weapons
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters September 2020 NUCLEAR WEAPONS NNSA Should Further Develop Cost, Schedule, and Risk Information for the W87-1 Warhead Program GAO-20-703 September 2020 NUCLEAR WEAPONS NNSA Should Further Develop Cost, Schedule, and Risk Information for the W87-1 Warhead Program Highlights of GAO-20-703, a report to congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found The Department of Defense (DOD) The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) did not consider cost and NNSA restarted a program in fiscal estimates in early major design decisions for the W87-1 warhead because it was year 2019 to replace the capabilities of not required to do so, but NNSA has since changed its guidance to require that the aging W78 nuclear warhead with cost be considered, according to a May 2019 NNSA review of program the W87-1. NNSA made key design documentation. The design decisions that remain for features that would achieve decisions for this weapon from 2010 either minimum or enhanced requirements for the W87-1 could affect cost, until the program was paused in 2014. according to NNSA officials (see table). We found, however, that NNSA did not NNSA estimated in December 2018 yet have study plans for assessing the costs and benefits of the remaining that the W87-1 would cost $8.6 billion decisions consistent with best practices as detailed in NNSA’s analysis of to $14.8 billion, which could make it the alternatives business procedure. NNSA does not require and only recommends most expensive warhead modernization program to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Stock WORLDWIDE NUCLEAR DEPLOYMENTS 1998
    Taking Stock WORLDWIDE NUCLEAR DEPLOYMENTS 1998 BY William M. Arkin Robert S. Norris Joshua Handler NRDC Nuclear Program MARCH 1998 NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. 1200 New York Ave., NW, Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20005 202/289-6868 VOICE 802-457-3426 (Arkin) 202-289-2369 (Norris) FAX 202-289-1060 INTERNET [email protected] [email protected] Worldwide Nuclear Deployments 1998 i © Copyright, Natural Resources Defense Council, 1998 ii TAKING STOCK Table of Contents Introduction . 1 Methodology . 4 Arms Control and Nuclear Weapons Deployments . 6 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START I) . 6 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START II) . 7 The Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty . 8 Unilateral Initiatives . 8 Future Nuclear Deployments . 11 The United States . 14 Nuclear History . 16 Nuclear Organization . 19 Nuclear Weapons Deployments . 24 Russia . 26 Nuclear Organization . 29 Nuclear Weapons Deployments . 33 Britain . 39 France . 42 China . 45 Appendix A: Locations of U.S. Nuclear Weapons, by Type . 53 Appendix B: U.S. Nuclear Weapons by Location . 55 Appendix C: U.S. Nuclear Weapons, Location Profiles . 56 By State California . 56 Colorado . 57 Georgia. 58 Louisiana . 59 Missouri . 60 Montana . 61 Nebraska . 61 Nevada . 62 New Mexico. 63 North Dakota . 65 Texas . 68 Virginia . 70 Washington . 70 Wyoming . 72 Overseas by Country Belgium . 72 Germany . 73 Greece . 76 Italy . 77 The Netherlands . 78 Turkey . 78 United Kingdom . 79 Appendix D: Location of Russian Nuclear Weapons, by Type . 81 Appendix E: Russian Nuclear Weapons by Location . 84 Appendix F: British Nuclear Weapons by Type and Location . 88 Appendix G: French Nuclear Weapons by Type and Location .
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Warhead Safety
    OCCASIONAL REPORT NUCLEAR WARHEAD SAFETY The following is an extract from the Report of the Panel on Nuclear Weapons Safety of the Committee on Armed Services House of Representatives, December 1990. The mem- bers of the panel were Sidney D. Drell, chairman, John S. Foster Jr, and Charles H. Townes. oncerns that have been raised recently about the safety of several of the Cnuclear weapons systems in the US arsenal have led the government to take immediate steps to reduce the risk of unintended, accidental detonations that could result in dispersing plutonium into the environment in potentially dangerous amounts, or even generate a nuclear yield. These steps include temporarily removing the short-range air-to-ground attack missiles, SRAM- A, from the alert bombers of the Strategic Air Command and modifying some of the artillery-fired atomic projectiles (AFAPs) deployed with US forces. In addition, the Departments of Defense and Energy, which hold dual responsi- bility for the surety of the US stockpile of nuclear weapons systems—i.e., for their safety, their security, and their control—have initiated studies looking more broadly into safety issues. This is a very important, as well as opportune, moment to undertake a safety review of nuclear weapons for reasons that go well beyond the immedi- ate concerns of several specific weapons. As we enter the last decade of the 20th century, the world is in the midst of profound, and indeed revolutionary, changes in the strategic, political, and military dimensions of international security. These changes, together with a continuing rapid pace of technical advances, create an entirely new context for making choices in the develop- ment of our nuclear forces for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • China: Suspected Acquisition of U.S
    Order Code RL30143 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web China: Suspected Acquisition of U.S. Nuclear Weapon Secrets Updated February 1, 2006 Shirley A. Kan Specialist in National Security Policy Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress China: Suspected Acquisition of U.S. Nuclear Weapon Secrets Summary This CRS Report discusses China’s suspected acquisition of U.S. nuclear weapon secrets, including that on the W88, the newest U.S. nuclear warhead. This serious controversy became public in early 1999 and raised policy issues about whether U.S. security was further threatened by China’s suspected use of U.S. nuclear weapon secrets in its development of nuclear forces, as well as whether the Administration’s response to the security problems was effective or mishandled and whether it fairly used or abused its investigative and prosecuting authority. The Clinton Administration acknowledged that improved security was needed at the weapons labs but said that it took actions in response to indications in 1995 that China may have obtained U.S. nuclear weapon secrets. Critics in Congress and elsewhere argued that the Administration was slow to respond to security concerns, mishandled the too narrow investigation, downplayed information potentially unfavorable to China and the labs, and failed to notify Congress fully. On April 7, 1999, President Clinton gave his assurance that partly “because of our engagement, China has, at best, only marginally increased its deployed nuclear threat in the last 15 years” and that the strategic balance with China “remains overwhelmingly in our favor.” On April 21, 1999, Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) George Tenet, reported the Intelligence Community’s damage assessment.
    [Show full text]