DOCSLIB.ORG

Of Families of Idaho

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Of Families of Idaho Anotated Checklist 1 CHECKLIST OF VASCULAR PLANTS OF BONNER AND BOUNDARY COUNTIES, IDAHO compiled by Marian J. Fuller, Ph.D in Botany This checklist of Bonner and Boundary counties contains 1382 vascular plant taxa belonging to 109 families and to 460 genera. The families are arranged phylogenetically, not alphabetically. Alphabetical indices of the families and genera are provided. The genera are arranged alphabetically within the each family, and species are arranged alphabetically within the genus. Additional sources and their acronyms: (BLM) = McFarlane, S, Kuhman T. and Johnson, C. 2002. Field Guide to Special Status Plants of the Cottonwood Field Office. (FPNW) = Hitchcock, C. L. and Cronquist, A. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. (PRM). = Kershaw L., A, MacKinnon and J. Pojar; Mousseaux, M.R. 1998. Plants of the Rocky Mountains. (IFG) =Idaho Fish and Game (in house document on plants of three recently acquired wetlands) (IPNF-RPFG) = Mousseaux, M.R, Idaho Panhandle National Forests--Rare Plant Field Guide (original and revised editions). (IPNF-) = Idaho Panhandle National Forests (in house document including K = Kaniksu, P = Priest Lake . (UIH) =University of Idaho Herbarium, Moscow. (USDA) = plants.usda.gov/classification Abbreviations: Br = Bonner County; By = Boundary County; Br and By = collected by MJF; Br and By = collected or notated by others. See additonal sources * = exotic taxon Ida? = maybe first record for Bonner and/or Boundary Counties, many not in FPNW. Explanation of the Components of a Checklist Entry: Maianthemum1 racemosum2 (L.)3 Link4 ssp.5 amplexicaule6 (Nutt.)7 LaFrankie8 WESTERN SOLOMON’S- SEAL9 10[Smilacina11 r.12 var.13 a.14] Br;By15 1generic name; 2specific epithet; 3abbreivation for Linnaeus, author of specific epithet; 1,2,3scientific name; 4author of “new” species combination; 5abbreviation for subspecies; 6subspecific epithet; 7abbrevation for Nuutall,author of subspecific epithet; 8author of the entire “new” entry; 9a common name; 10the synonym used in the FPNW (see synonmy); 11“old” generic name; 12abbreivation for specific epiteth; 13abreviation for variety; 14abbreviation for variety; 15collected in both Bonner and Boundary Counties by MJF. Synonomy: in this checklist, the synonyms used in the Flora of the Pacific Northwest have been placed within brackets, [ ]’s. Many genera have been split. For example, the genus Aster has been split into several genera, including Canadanthus, Eucephalus, Ionactis, and Symphyotrichum. Sometimes, a species has been determined to be a subspecies or variety of an “older” species. Frequently, a subspecies or variety has been deemed distinct enough to be elevated to the species level. Dedication: to Blue III, Azure and Blue IV, my friends and faithful companions during the thirty years of this project. I was never alone. They probably thought “picking posies” was crazy, but they put up with all my idiosyncrasies. They are my beloved “hearing-ear” dogs. Anotated Checklist 2 INDEX OF FAMILIES Two families, Loranthaceae and Nymphaeaceae, have been split. The genus, Arceuthobium, of “old family”, Loranthaceae, has been placed in the “new family” Viscaceae. The genus, Brasenia, of the “old family”, Nymphaeaceae, has been placed in the “new family” Cabombaceae. A Crassulaceae 24 L Polypodiaceae 8 Aceraceae 32 Cupressaceae 9 Lamiaceae 37 Portulacaceae 13 Alismatceae 50 Cucurbitaceae 18 Lemnaceae 63 Potamogetonaceae 50 Amaranthaceae 13 Cuscutaceae 35 Lentibulariaceae 41 Primulaceae 23 Anacardiaceae 32 Cyperaceae 52 Liliaceae 70 Pteridaceae 7 Apiaceae 33 D Linaceae 35 Pyrolaceae 22 Apocynaceae 35 Dennstaedtiaceae 7 [Loranthaceae] 31 R Araceae 63 Droseraceae 17 Limnanthaceae 33 Ranunculaceae 10 Araliaceae 33 Dryopteridaceae 7 Lycopodiaceae 5 Rhamnaceae 32 Aristolochiaceae 9 E M Rosaceae 27 Asclepiadaceae 35 Elaeagnaceae 33 Malvaceae 17 Rubiaceae 42 Aspleniaceae 7 Elatinaceae 17 Marsileaceae 8 S Asteraceae 43 Ericaceae 21 Menyanthaceae 35 Salicaceae 19 B Equisetaceae 5 Monotropaceae 23 Saxifragaceae 24 Balsaminaceae 33 Euphorbiaceae 32 N Scheuchzeriaceae 50 Berberidaceae 12 F Najadaceae 51 Scrophulariaceae 39 Betulaceae 12 Fabaceae 28 Nyctaginaceae 13 Selaginellaceae 5 Blechnaceae 7 G Nymphaeaceae 10 Solanaceae 38 Boraginaceae 36 Gentianaceae 34 O Sparganiaceae 63 Brassicaceae 19 Geraniaceae 33 Oleaceaceae 39 T C Grossulariaceae 24 Onagraceae 30 Taxaceae 9 Cabombaceae 10 H Ophioglossaceae 6 Thelypteridaceae 7 Campanulaceae 42 Haloragaceae 32 Orchidaceae 65 Typhaceae 63 Callitrichaceae 38 Hippuridaceae 38 Orobanchaceae 41 U Cannabaceae 12 Hydrangeaceae 25 Oxalidaceae 33 Ulmaceae 12 Caprifoliaceae 42 Hydrocharitaceae 50 P Urticaceae 12 Caryophyllaceae 14 Hydrophyllaceae 36 Papaveraceae 12 V Celastraceae 31 I Pinaceae 8 Valerianaceae 43 Ceratophyllaceae 10 Iridaceae 65 Plantaginaceae 39 Verbenaceae 37 Chenopodiaceae 13 Isoetaceae 5 Poaceae 57 Violaceae 18 Clusiaceae 17 J Polemoniaceae 35 Viscaceae 31 Convolvulaceae 35 Juncaceae 51 Polygonaceae 16 Z Cornaceae 34 Juncaginaceae 50 Zannichelliaceae 51 INDEX OF GENERA A 61,62,] Andromeda 22 Arenaria 14 [14] Abies 8 Agrostemma 14 Anemone 10 [10] Argentina 25 Acer 32 Agrostis 57 [58] Angelica 36 Arnica 44 Achnatherum 57 Aira 57 Antennaria 43 Arrhenatherum 58 Achillea 43 Alisma 50 Apera 58 Artemisia 44 Aconitum 10 Allium 63 Apocynum 35 Asarum 9 Acroptilon 43 Alnus 12 Aquilegia 10 Asclepias 35 Actaea 10 Alopecurus 57 Arabidopsis 19 Asparagus 63 Adenocaulon 43 Alyssum 19 Arabis 19 Aspidotis 7 Adiantum 7 Amaranthus 13 Aralia 33 Asplenium 7 Agastache 37 Amelanchier 25 Arceuthobium 31 Aster 44 [45,46,47, Agoseris 43 Amsinckia 36 Arctium 44 49] Agropyron 57 [59,60, Anaphalis 47 Arctostaphylos 22 Astragalus 28 Anotated Checklist 3 Athyrium 7 Circaea 30 Elodea 55 Hierochloe 60 Avena 58 Cirsium 45 Elymus 59 [60] Hippuris 38 B Cistanthe 13 Elytrigia 60 Holcus 60 Balsamorhiza 44 Clarkia 30 Epilobium 31 [30] Holodiscus 26 Barbarea 19 Claytonia 14 Epipactis 66 Humulus 13 Beckmannia 58 Clematis 10 Equisetum 5 Huperzia 5 [Berberis 12] Clinopodium 37 Erigeron 45 [40] Hydrangea 23 Berteroa 20 Clintonia 64 Eriogonum 17 Hydrilla 50 Besseya 39 Collinsia 39 Eriophorum 56 Hydrophyllum 36 Betula 13 Collomia 35 Erodium 33 Hylotelephium 24 Bidens 45 [47] Comarum 25 Erucastrum 20 Hypericum 17 Blechnum 7 Conringia 20 Erysimum 20 [Hypopitys 23] Botrychium 6 Convallaria 64 Erythronium 64 I Brasenia 10 Convolvulus 35 Eschscholzia 12 Iliamna 17 Brassica 20 Conyza 45 Euphorbia 32 [32] Impatiens 33 Brickellia 45 Coptis 10 Eurybia 46 Ionactis 47 [Brodiaea 64] Corallorhiza 65 Euthamia 46 Ipomopsis 35 Bromus 58 Corispermum 13 F Iris 65 Buglossoides 36 Cornus 32 Fagopyrum 16 Isoetes 5 C Coronilla 28 Festuca 60 [60,61,63] Ivesia 28 Calamagrostis 58 Crataegus 25 Filago 46 J Callitriche 38 Crepis 45 Floerkea 33 Juncus 51 Calochortus 63 Cruciata 42 Fragaria 26 Juniperus 9 Caltha 10 Cryptantha 36 Frangula 35 K Calylophus 30 Cryptogramma 7 Frasera 34 Kalmia 22 Calypso 65 Cynoglossum 37 Fritillaria 64 Kochia 13 [Calyptridium 13] Cuscuta 35 G Koeleria 60 Calystegia 35 Cypripedium 66 Gaillardia 46 L Camassia 64 Cystopteris 8 Galeopsis 38 Lactuca 47 Camelina 20 Cytisus 28 Galium 42 Lamium 38 Campanula 42 D Gaultheria 22 Lapsana 47 Canadanthus 45 Dactylis 59 Gayophytum 31 Larix 8 Cannabis 12 Danthonia 59 Gentiana 34 [34] Lathyrus 28 Capsella 20 [Dasiphora 26] Gentianella 34 Ledum 22 Caragana 28 Daucus 36 Geranium 33 Leersia 60 Cardamine 20 Delphinium 10 Geum 26 Lemna 63 Carex 52 Deschampsia 59 [63] Gilia 35 [35] Lepidium 20 Cassiope 22 Descurainia 20 Glechoma 38 Leptarrhena 24 Castilleja 39 Dianthus 14 Glyceria 60 Leptochloa 60 Ceanothus 32 Dichanthelium 59 Gnaphalium 46 [48] Leymus 60 Celtis 12 Digitalis 39 Goodyera 66 Ligusticum 34 Cenchrus 59 Digitaria 59 Gratiola 39 Lilium 64 Centaurea 45 [43] Disporum 64 Gymnocarpium 8 Limosella 39 Centaurium 34 Dodecatheon 23 H Linanthus 35 Cephalanthera 65 Downingia 42 [Habenaria 66] Linaria 39 Cerastium 154 Draba 20 Hackelia 37 Linnaea 42 Ceratophyllum 10 Dracocephalum 37 Halimolobos 20 Linum 32 Chamaesyce 32 Drosera 17 Hedeoma 38 Listera 66 Cheilanthes 7 Dryopteris 8 Helenium 46 Lithophragma 24 Chenopodium 13 Dulichium 56 Helianthus 46 Lithospermum 37, [36] Chondrilla 45 E Heracleum 34 Lloydia 64 [Chrysantheum 49] [Eburophyton 65] Hesperis 20 Lolium 60 [Chrysopsis 46] Echinochloa 59 Heterocodon 42 Lomatium 34 Cichorium 45 Echinocystis 19 Heterotheca 46 Lonicera 42 Cicuta 33 Elatine 17 Heuchera 24 Lotus 29 Cinna 59 Eleocharis 56 Hieracium 46 Lupinus 29 Anotated Checklist 4 Luzula 52 P Rorippa 21 [21] T Lycopodiella 5 Packera 47 Rosa 27 Tanacetum 49 Lycopodium 5 Panicum 61 [59] Rubus 27 Taraxacum 49 Lycopus 38 Papaver 12 Rudbeckia 48 Taxus 9 Lysichitum 63 Parnassia 25 Rumex 17 Tellima 25 Lysimachia 23 Paronychia 15 S Thalictrum 11 M Pascopyrum 61 Sagina 15 Thelypodium 21 Madia 47 Paxistima 31 Sagittaria 54 Thelypteris 7 [7] Mahonia 12 Pedicularis 40 Salix 18 Thermopsis 29 Maianthemum 64 Penstemon 40 Salsola 13 Thlaspi 21 Malus 26 Petasites 48 Sambucus 42 Thuja 9 Malva 26 Phacelia 36 Sanguisorba 28 Tiarella 25 Marsilea 8 Phalaris 61 Sanicula 34 [Tillaea 24] Matricaria 47 Phegopteris 7 Saponaria 1 Tofieldia 64 Medicago 29 Philadelphus 24 Saxifraga 25 Torreyochloa 62 Megalodonta 47 Phleum 61 Schedonerus 62 Toxicodendron 35 Melampyrum 42 Phlox 36 Scheuchzeria 50 Tragopogon 54 Melica 61 Phragmites 61 Schoenoplectus 57 Trautvetteria 12 Melilotus 29 Phyllodoce 22 Scleranthus 15 Trichophorum 62 [62] Mentha 38 Physocarpus 26 Sclerochloa 68 [Triantha 64] Menziesia 22 Picea 9 Scirpus 57 [57] Trientalis 25 Mertensia 37 Pinus 9 Scrophularia
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biological Resources Report Biological Report for Vesting Tentative Parcel Map/Use Permit 10-001 Town of Mammoth Lakes, California
    Appendix A: Biological Resources Report Biological Report for Vesting Tentative Parcel Map/Use Permit 10-001 Town of Mammoth Lakes, California October 6, 2010 Prepared For: Town of Mammoth Lakes P.O. Box 1609 Mammoth Lakes, CA 93546 Prepared By: Resource Concepts, Inc. 340 N Minnesota Street Carson City, NV 89703 Biological Report Vesting Tentative Parcel Map/Use Permit 10-001 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS FINDINGS IN THE 1995 BLUFFS EIR............................................ 1 LITERATURE AND DATABASE REVIEW .................................................................................. 2 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION..................................................................................................... 2 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 5 Resource Concepts, Inc. i October 6, 2010 Biological Report Vesting Tentative Parcel Map/Use Permit 10-001 Introduction Resource Concepts, Inc (RCI) was retained by the Town of Mammoth Lakes (the Town) to provide biological services for Vesting Tentative Parcel Map/Use Permit 10-001 (VTPM/UPA). RCI was asked to verify and augment (if necessary) the Vegetation and Wildlife sections of the 1995 Bluffs Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for inclusion in the Initial Study for the Project. The Town requested site-specific analyses to: 1) Review and determine the applicability and conformance with the impact analysis and mitigation measures specified in the 1995 Bluffs EIR, and 2) Conduct additional site reconnaissance of the VTPM/UPA Project Site (approx 4.3 acres) as well as the two additional parcels (labeled LLA 08-001 Parcels 1 and 2) and the Parcel A, as shown on the attached Sheet 1. On September 8, 2010 two RCI Biologists completed an inspection and site assessment of the VTPM/UPA Project Area and reconnaissance of the 1995 Bluffs EIR Project Area.
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Habitat Restoration in Eastern Washington Wine Vineyards
    NATIVE HABITAT RESTORATION IN EASTERN WASHINGTON WINE VINEYARDS AS A PEST MANAGEMENT STRATEGY By KATHARINE DENISE BUCKLEY A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Department of Entomology MAY 2019 © Copyright by KATHARINE DENISE BUCKLEY, 2019 All Rights Reserved © Copyright by KATHARINE DENISE BUCKLEY, 2019 All Rights Reserved To the Faculty of Washington State University: The members of the Committee appointed to examine the dissertation of KATHARINE DENISE BUCKLEY find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. _______________________________ David James, Ph.D., Chair _______________________________ Elizabeth Beers, Ph.D. _______________________________ Joan Davenport, Ph.D. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank Lorraine Seymour and Gerry Lauby for their expertise, their organizational skills, their excellence as sounding boards, and hopefully their ability to pass some of that on to me. I thank Cole Provence and my family who were always supportive. I thank all the people who helped me with my statistics, especially Bernardo Chaves. I thank the computer technician who saved my computer’s data and my life. I thank Michael Aquilino. He knows what he did. Finally, I’d like to thank everyone who served on my committee, as well as Laura Lavine, for their guidance along the way. iii NATIVE HABITAT RESTORATION IN EASTERN WASHINGTON WINE VINEYARDS AS A PEST MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Abstract by Katharine Denise Buckley, Ph.D. Washington State University May 2019 Chair: David James Perennial crop systems such as wine grapes have begun using cover crops and hedgerows to increase beneficial insects and promote sustainable vineyard management in areas such as New Zealand and California.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2004 Kelseya
    Summer 2004 Kelseya Volume 17 No. 4 e i n Kelseya n o B : n Newsletter of the Montana Native Plant Society o i t a r t s www.umt.edu/mnps/ u l l I Montana Native Plant Society 2002 and 2003 Small Grants Program Trillium ovatum in western Montana—implications for conservation by Tarn Ream sects, such as beetles and bees, for- jackets. The insects transport seeds ose of you who walk age for their pollen. Seed dispersal to their nests where they eat the oily along the forested is also dependent on insects—each food-body and discard the seeds. streamsTh and seeps of western Mon- seed bears a conspicuous, yellow Western Trillium is sensitive to dis- tana in the spring are likely to en- food-body, called an elaiosome, turbance, particularly in the harsh, counter the white-flowering herba- which is attractive to ants and yellow dry conditions of Montana, where it ceous perennial Trillium ovatum. grows at the eastern edge of its Trillium, a name that refers to three range. Removal of rhizomes, the leaves and three petals, has many medicinal portion of the plant, for common names including Wake- commercial use is often skewed to- robin, because it blooms early in the ward the less common large, repro- spring, and Bethroot (Birthroot), in ductive-age plants. There is concern reference to traditional medicinal that market-driven, unsustainable use of the rhizome by Native Ameri- harvest of native medicinal plant cans for childbirth. There are many species, such as Trillium ovatum, species of Trillium in North America, could decimate populations in a very but only Western Trillium, Trillium short time.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Colorado 2016 Wetland Plant List
    5/12/16 State of Colorado 2016 Wetland Plant List Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin. 2016. The National Wetland Plant List: 2016 wetland ratings. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17. Published 28 April 2016. ISSN 2153 733X http://wetland-plants.usace.army.mil/ Aquilegia caerulea James (Colorado Blue Columbine) Photo: William Gray List Counts: Wetland AW GP WMVC Total UPL 83 120 101 304 FACU 440 393 430 1263 FAC 333 292 355 980 FACW 342 329 333 1004 OBL 279 285 285 849 Rating 1477 1419 1504 1511 User Notes: 1) Plant species not listed are considered UPL for wetland delineation purposes. 2) A few UPL species are listed because they are rated FACU or wetter in at least one Corps Region. 3) Some state boundaries lie within two or more Corps Regions. If a species occurs in one region but not the other, its rating will be shown in one column and the other column will be BLANK. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 1/22 5/12/16 Scientific Name Authorship AW GP WMVC Common Name Abies bifolia A. Murr. FACU FACU Rocky Mountain Alpine Fir Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL UPL FACU Velvetleaf Acalypha rhomboidea Raf. FACU FACU Common Three-Seed-Mercury Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FACU Rocky Mountain Maple Acer grandidentatum Nutt. FACU FAC FACU Canyon Maple Acer negundo L. FACW FAC FAC Ash-Leaf Maple Acer platanoides L. UPL UPL FACU Norw ay Maple Acer saccharinum L. FAC FAC FAC Silver Maple Achillea millefolium L. FACU FACU FACU Common Yarrow Achillea ptarmica L.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Species of Special Concern and Vascular Plant Flora of the National
    Plant Species of Special Concern and Vascular Plant Flora of the National Elk Refuge Prepared for the US Fish and Wildlife Service National Elk Refuge By Walter Fertig Wyoming Natural Diversity Database The Nature Conservancy 1604 Grand Avenue Laramie, WY 82070 February 28, 1998 Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following individuals for their assistance with this project: Jim Ozenberger, ecologist with the Jackson Ranger District of Bridger-Teton National Forest, for guiding me in his canoe on Flat Creek and for providing aerial photographs and lodging; Jennifer Whipple, Yellowstone National Park botanist, for field assistance and help with field identification of rare Carex species; Dr. David Cooper of Colorado State University, for sharing field information from his 1994 studies; Dr. Ron Hartman and Ernie Nelson of the Rocky Mountain Herbarium, for providing access to unmounted collections by Michele Potkin and others from the National Elk Refuge; Dr. Anton Reznicek of the University of Michigan, for confirming the identification of several problematic Carex specimens; Dr. Robert Dorn for confirming the identification of several vegetative Salix specimens; and lastly Bruce Smith and the staff of the National Elk Refuge for providing funding and logistical support and for allowing me free rein to roam the refuge for plants. 2 Table of Contents Page Introduction . 6 Study Area . 6 Methods . 8 Results . 10 Vascular Plant Flora of the National Elk Refuge . 10 Plant Species of Special Concern . 10 Species Summaries . 23 Aster borealis . 24 Astragalus terminalis . 26 Carex buxbaumii . 28 Carex parryana var. parryana . 30 Carex sartwellii . 32 Carex scirpoidea var. scirpiformis .
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • DECISION NOTICE/DESIGNATION ORDER Decision Notice Finding Of
    DECISION NOTICE/DESIGNATION ORDER Decision Notice Finding of No Significant Impact Designation Order By virtue of the authority vested in me by the Secretary of Agriculture under regulations at 7 CFR 2.42, 36 CFR 251.23, and 36 CFR Part 219, I hereby establish the Osborn Mountain Research Natural Area. It shall be comprised of lands described in the section of the Establishment Record entitled "Location." The Regional Forester has recommended the establishment of this Research Natural Area in the Record of Decision for the Bridger-Teton National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan. That recommendation was the result of analysis of the factors listed in 36 CFR 219.25 and Forest Service Manual 4063.41. Results of the Regional Forester's analysis are documented in the Bridger-Teton National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement which are available to the public. The Osborn Mountain Research Natural Area will be managed in compliance with all relevant laws, regulations, and Forest Service Manual direction regarding Research Natural Areas. It will be administered in accordance with the management direction/prescription identified in the Establishment Record. I have reviewed the Bridger-Teton Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP) direction for this RNA and find that the management direction cited in the previous paragraph is consistent with the LRMP and that a Plan amendment is not required. The Forest Supervisor of the Bridger-Teton National Forest shall notify the public of this decision and mail a copy of the Decision Notice/Designation Order and amended direction to all persons on the Bridger-Teton National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan mailing list.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Vii Table of Contents
    CHAPTER VII TABLE OF CONTENTS VII. APPENDICES AND REFERENCES CITED........................................................................1 Appendix 1: Description of Vegetation Databases......................................................................1 Appendix 2: Suggested Stocking Levels......................................................................................8 Appendix 3: Known Plants of the Desolation Watershed.........................................................15 Literature Cited............................................................................................................................25 CHAPTER VII - APPENDICES & REFERENCES - DESOLATION ECOSYSTEM ANALYSIS i VII. APPENDICES AND REFERENCES CITED Appendix 1: Description of Vegetation Databases Vegetation data for the Desolation ecosystem analysis was stored in three different databases. This document serves as a data dictionary for the existing vegetation, historical vegetation, and potential natural vegetation databases, as described below: • Interpretation of aerial photography acquired in 1995, 1996, and 1997 was used to characterize existing (current) conditions. The 1996 and 1997 photography was obtained after cessation of the Bull and Summit wildfires in order to characterize post-fire conditions. The database name is: 97veg. • Interpretation of late-1930s and early-1940s photography was used to characterize historical conditions. The database name is: 39veg. • The potential natural vegetation was determined for each polygon in the analysis
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited
    Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volumes 19, 20, and 21, whether as selected references, in text, or in nomenclatural contexts. In citations of articles, both here and in the taxonomic treatments, and also in nomenclatural citations, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991). When those forms are abbre- viated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. In nomenclatural citations (only), book titles are rendered in the abbreviated forms recommended in F. A. Stafleu and R. S. Cowan (1976–1988) and F. A. Stafleu and E. A. Mennega (1992+). Here, those abbreviated forms are indicated parenthetically following the full citations of the corresponding works, and cross references to the full citations are interpolated in the list alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix “a”; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with “b”. Works missing from any suffixed sequence here are ones cited elsewhere in the Flora that are not pertinent in these volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Plant Species for Crop Pollinator Habitat Enhancement in the Northern Prairies
    Journal of Pollination Ecology, 14(21), 2014, pp 218-234 IDENTIFICATION OF PLANT SPECIES FOR CROP POLLINATOR HABITAT ENHANCEMENT IN THE NORTHERN PRAIRIES Diana B. Robson* The Manitoba Museum, 190 Rupert Avenue, Winnipeg, MB Canada R3B 0N2 Abstract—Wild pollinators have a positive impact on the productivity of insect-pollinated crops. Consequently, landowners are being encouraged to maintain and grow wildflower patches to provide habitat for important pollinators. Research on plant-pollinator interaction matrices indicates that a small number of “core” plants provide a disproportionately high amount of pollen and nectar to insects. This matrix data can be used to help design wildflower plantings that provide optimal resources for desirable pollinators. Existing interaction matrices from three tall grass prairie preserves in the northern prairies were used to identify core plant species that are visited by wild pollinators of a common insect-pollinated crop, namely canola (Brassica napus L.). The wildflower preferences of each insect taxon were determined using quantitative insect visitation and floral abundance data. Phenology data were used to calculate the degree of floral synchrony between the wildflowers and canola. Using this information I ranked the 41 wildflowers that share insect visitors with canola according to how useful they are for providing pollinators with forage before and after canola flowers. The top five species were smooth blue aster (Symphyotrichum laeve (L.) A. & D. Löve), stiff goldenrod (Solidago rigida L.), wild bergamot (Monarda fistulosa L.), purple prairie-clover (Dalea purpurea Vent.) and Lindley’s aster (Symphyotrichum ciliolatum (Lindl.) A. & D. Löve). By identifying the most important wild insects for crop pollination, and determining when there will be “pollen and nectar gaps”, appropriate plant species can be selected for companion plantings to increase pollinator populations and crop production.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant Inventory of Mount Rainier National Park
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Vascular Plant Inventory of Mount Rainier National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCCN/NRTR—2010/347 ON THE COVER Mount Rainier and meadow courtesy of 2007 Mount Rainier National Park Vegetation Crew Vascular Plant Inventory of Mount Rainier National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NCCN/NRTR—2010/347 Regina M. Rochefort North Cascades National Park Service Complex 810 State Route 20 Sedro-Woolley, Washington 98284 June 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received informal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data.
    [Show full text]