Department of the Interior

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Department of the Interior Vol. 76 Tuesday, No. 192 October 4, 2011 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Finding on a Petition To List 10 Subspecies of Great Basin Butterflies as Threatened or Endangered With Critical Habitat; Proposed Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:01 Oct 03, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\04OCP3.SGM 04OCP3 emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2 61532 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 192 / Tuesday, October 4, 2011 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Portal (see ADDRESSES section, below), skipper (Hesperia uncas reeseorum), the deadline for submitting an Carson Valley wood nymph (Cercyonis Fish and Wildlife Service electronic comment is 11:59 p.m. pegala carsonensis), Steptoe Valley Eastern Standard Time on this date. crescentspot (Phyciodes cocyta 50 CFR Part 17 After December 5, 2011, you must arenacolor), Mattoni’s blue butterfly [FWS–R8–ES–2010–0097; 92210–1111– submit information directly to the Field (Euphilotes pallescens mattonii), and 0000–B2] Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION White River Valley skipper (Hesperia CONTACT section below). Please note that uncas grandiose). Endangered and Threatened Wildlife we might not be able to address or Based on our review, we find that the and Plants; 90-Day Finding on a incorporate information that we receive petition presents substantial scientific Petition To List 10 Subspecies of Great after the above requested date. or commercial information indicating Basin Butterflies as Threatened or ADDRESSES: You may submit that listing 4 of the 10 subspecies as Endangered With Critical Habitat information by one of the following threatened or endangered may be warranted, and we find that the petition AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, methods: • does not present substantial scientific or Interior. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the commercial information indicating that ACTION: Notice of petition finding and instructions for submitting comments to listing the remaining 6 of the 10 initiation of status review. Docket No. FWS–R8–ES–2010–0097. subspecies as threatened or endangered SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Check the box that reads ‘‘Open for may be warranted. Wildlife Service (Service), announce a Comment/Submission,’’ and then click Request for Information 90-day finding on a petition to list 10 the Search button. You should then see subspecies of Great Basin butterflies in an icon that reads ‘‘Submit a Comment.’’ When we make a finding that a Nevada and California as threatened or Please ensure that you have found the petition presents substantial endangered under the Endangered correct rulemaking before submitting information indicating that listing a Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act), your comment. species may be warranted, we are and designate critical habitat. Based on • U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public required to promptly review the status our review, we find that the petition Comments Processing, Attn: Docket No. of the species (status review). For the presents substantial scientific or FWS–R8–ES–2010–0097; Division of status review to be complete and based commercial information indicating that Policy and Directives Management; U.S. on the best available scientific and listing the following 4 of the 10 Fish and Wildlife Service; 4401 N. commercial information, we request subspecies as threatened or endangered Fairfax Drive, MS 2042–PDM; information on the four subspecies of may be warranted: Baking Powder Flat Arlington, VA 22203. butterflies from governmental agencies, blue butterfly, bleached sandhill We will post all information we Native American Tribes, the scientific skipper, Steptoe Valley crescentspot, receive on http://www.regulations.gov. community, industry, and any other and White River Valley skipper. This generally means that we will post interested parties. We seek information Therefore, with the publication of this any personal information you provide on: notice, we are initiating a review of the us (see the Request for Information (1) The species’ biology, range, and status of these four subspecies to section below for more details). population trends, including: (a) Habitat requirements for feeding, determine if listing these subspecies is FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jill breeding, and sheltering; warranted. To ensure that this status A. Ralston, Acting State Supervisor, Nevada Fish and Wildlife Office, U.S. (b) Genetics and taxonomy; review is comprehensive, we are (c) Historical and current range Fish and Wildlife Service, 1340 requesting scientific and commercial including distribution patterns; Financial Blvd., Suite 234, Reno, NV data and other information regarding (d) Historical and current population 89502, by telephone (775–861–6300), or these four subspecies. Based on the levels, and current and projected trends; by facsimile (775–861–6301). If you use status review, we will issue a 12-month and finding on these four subspecies, which a telecommunications device for the (e) Past and ongoing conservation will address whether the petitioned deaf (TDD), please call the Federal measures for the species, its habitat or action is warranted under the Act. Information Relay Service (FIRS) at both. We find that the petition does not 800–877–8339. (2) The factors that are the basis for present substantial scientific or SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We making a listing determination for a commercial information indicating that announce a 90-day finding on a petition species under section 4(a) of the Act (16 listing the remaining 6 of the 10 to list 10 subspecies of Great Basin U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), which are: subspecies as threatened or endangered butterflies in Nevada and California as (a) The present or threatened may be warranted: Carson Valley threatened or endangered under the Act destruction, modification, or silverspot, Carson Valley wood nymph, and designate critical habitat. The curtailment of its habitat or range; Mattoni’s blue butterfly, Mono Basin petitioners had requested that we list (b) Overutilization for commercial, skipper, and the two Railroad Valley following 10 subspecies of Great Basin recreational, scientific, or educational skipper subspecies. However, we ask butterflies in Nevada and California as purposes; the public to submit to us any new threatened or endangered under the Act (c) Disease or predation; information that becomes available and designate critical habitat: Baking (d) The inadequacy of existing concerning the status of, or threats to, Powder Flat blue butterfly (Euphilotes regulatory mechanisms; or these four subspecies or their habitat at bernardino minuta), Mono Basin (e) Other natural or manmade factors any time. skipper (Hesperia uncas giulianii), affecting its continued existence. DATES: To allow us adequate time to bleached sandhill skipper (Polites If, after the status review, we conduct this review, we request that we sabuleti sinemaculata), Railroad Valley determine that listing any of the six receive information on or before skipper (Hesperia uncas fulvapalla), subspecies is warranted, we will December 5, 2011. Please note that if Carson Valley silverspot (Speyeria propose critical habitat (see definition you are using the Federal eRulemaking nokomis carsonensis), Railroad Valley in section 3(5)(A) of the Act), under VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:01 Oct 03, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\04OCP3.SGM 04OCP3 emcdonald on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 192 / Tuesday, October 4, 2011 / Proposed Rules 61533 section 4 of the Act, to the maximum available for you to review at http:// and critical habitat actions in Fiscal extent prudent and determinable at the www.regulations.gov, or you may make Year 2010 pursuant to court orders, time we propose to list the species. an appointment during normal business judicially approved settlement Therefore, within the geographical range hours at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife agreements, and other statutory currently occupied by the six Service, Nevada Fish and Wildlife deadlines, we were able to secure subspecies, we request data and Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION funding in Fiscal Year 2010 to begin information on: CONTACT). work on the initial finding to determine (1) What may constitute ‘‘physical or Background whether the petition provides biological features essential to the substantial information indicating that conservation of the species’’; Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act requires the action may be warranted. This (2) Where these features are currently that we make a finding on whether a finding addresses the petition. found; and petition to list, delist, or reclassify a (3) Whether any of these features may species presents substantial scientific or Previous Federal Actions require special management commercial information indicating that considerations or protection. the petitioned action may be warranted. On May 22, 1984, we added Mattoni’s In addition, we request data and We are to base this finding on blue butterfly as Euphilotes information on ‘‘specific areas outside information provided in the petition, (=Shijimiaeoides) rita mattonii to our the geographical area occupied by the supporting information submitted with list of candidate species as a Category 2 species’’ that are ‘‘essential to the the petition, and information otherwise candidate species (49 FR 21664). This conservation of the species.’’ Please available in our files.
Recommended publications
  • Manitoba Conservation Data Centre Surveys and Stewardship Activities, 2013
    Manitoba Conservation Data Centre Surveys and Stewardship Activities, 2013 Manitoba Conservation Data Centre Colin Murray Report No. 2014-01 Manitoba Conservation Data Centre Box 24, 200 Saulteaux Crescent Winnipeg, Manitoba R3J 3W3 www.manitoba.ca/conservation/cdc Recommended Citation: Murray, C. 2014. Manitoba Conservation Data Centre Surveys and Stewardship Activities, 2013. Report No. 2014-01. Manitoba Conservation Data Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba. v+41 pp. Images: Unless otherwise noted, all images are ©Manitoba Conservation Data Centre. Cover image: View of the Assiniboine River and Beaver Creek valleys looking south from a top the valley plateau. Inset is a White Flower Moth (Schinia bimatris) at rest. Photographed at Spruce Woods Provincial Park. Manitoba Conservation Data Centre Surveys and Stewardship Activities, 2013 By Colin Murray Manitoba Conservation Data Centre Wildlife Branch Manitoba Conservation and Water Stewardship Winnipeg, Manitoba Executive Summary In 2013, the Manitoba Conservation Data Center (MBCDC) added nearly 1,240 new occurrences to its Biodiversity Geospatial Database. This represents thousands of species at risk (SAR) observations including 27 plant and 51 animal species. Observations were gathered by MBCDC staff and also submitted to the MBCDC by individuals and other organisations. This information will further enhance our understanding of biodiversity in Manitoba and guide research, development, and educational efforts. This year MBCDC field surveys targeted 21 species which are listed under the federal Species at Risk Act, assessed by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC), and listed under Manitoba’s Endangered Species and Ecosystems Act, and especially occurring in the mixed-grass prairie and sandhill areas of southwestern Manitoba.
    [Show full text]
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations
    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Fish Habitat Partnership
    A Fish Habitat Partnership Strategic Plan for Fish Habitat Conservation in Midwest Glacial Lakes Engbretson Underwater Photography September 30, 2009 This page intentionally left blank. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 I. BACKGROUND 7 II. VALUES OF GLACIAL LAKES 8 III. OVERVIEW OF IMPACTS TO GLACIAL LAKES 9 IV. AN ECOREGIONAL APPROACH 14 V. MULTIPLE INTERESTS WITH COMMON GOALS 23 VI. INVASIVES SPECIES, CLIMATE CHANGE 23 VII. CHALLENGES 25 VIII. INTERIM OBJECTIVES AND TARGETS 26 IX. INTERIM PRIORITY WATERSHEDS 29 LITERATURE CITED 30 APPENDICES I Steering Committee, Contributing Partners and Working Groups 33 II Fish Habitat Conservation Strategies Grouped By Themes 34 III Species of Greatest Conservation Need By Level III Ecoregions 36 Contact Information: Pat Rivers, Midwest Glacial Lakes Project Manager 1601 Minnesota Drive Brainerd, MN 56401 Telephone 218-327-4306 [email protected] www.midwestglaciallakes.org 3 Executive Summary OUR MISSION The mission of the Midwest Glacial Lakes Partnership is to work together to protect, rehabilitate, and enhance sustainable fish habitats in glacial lakes of the Midwest for the use and enjoyment of current and future generations. Glacial lakes (lakes formed by glacial activity) are a common feature on the midwestern landscape. From small, productive potholes to the large windswept walleye “factories”, glacial lakes are an integral part of the communities within which they are found and taken collectively are a resource of national importance. Despite this value, lakes are commonly treated more as a commodity rather than a natural resource susceptible to degradation. Often viewed apart from the landscape within which they occupy, human activities on land—and in water—have compromised many of these systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Status Species List
    APPENDIX J SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES LIST SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES LIST APPENDIX J SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES LIST Common Name Scientific Name State Class Status1 A Caddisfly Farula constricta OR Insect BS Adder’s-tongue Ophioglossum pusillum OR Plant BS Agave, Arizona Agave arizonica AZ Plant FE Agave, Murphey Agave murpheyi AZ Plant BS Agave, Santa Cruz Striped Agave parviflora AZ Plant BS Agoseris, Pink Agoseris lackschewitzii ID Plant BS Albatross, Short-tailed Phoebastris albatrus AK, CA Bird FE Alkaligrass, Howell’s Puccinellia howelli CA Plant BS Alkaligrass, Lemon’s Puccinellia lemmonii CA Plant BS Alkaligrass, Parish’s Puccinellia parishii CA, MT Plant BS Alpine-aster, Tall Oreostemma elatum CA Plant BS Alpine-parsley, Trotter’s Oreoxis trotteri UT Plant BS Alumroot, Duran’s Heuchera duranii CA Plant BS Amaranth, California Amaranthus californicus MT Plant BS Ambersnail, Kanab Oxyloma haydeni kanabensis AZ, UT Snail FE Ambrosia, San Diego Ambrosia pumila CA Plant FE Chlorogalum purpureum var. Amole, Purple CA Plant FT purpureum Amphipod, Malheur Cave Stygobromus hubbsi OR Crustacean BS Amphipod, Noel’s Gammarus desperatus NM Crustacean PE Angelica, King’s Angelica kingii ID Plant BS Angelica, Rough Angelica scabrida NV Plant BS Apachebush Apacheria chircahuensis NM Plant BS Apple, Indian Peraphyllum ramosissimum ID Plant BS Arrowhead, Sanford’s Sagittaria sanfordii CA Plant BS Aster, Gorman’s Eucephalus gormanii OR Plant BS Aster, Pygmy Eurybia pygmaea AK Plant BS Aster, Red Rock Canyon Ionactis caelestis NV Plant BS Avens, Mountain Senecio moresbiensis AK Plant BS Baccharis, Encinitis Baccharis vanessae CA Plant FT Balloonvine Cardiospermum corindum AZ Plant BS Balsamorhiza macrolepis var. Balsamroot, Big-scale CA Plant BS macrolepis Balsamroot, Large-leaved Balsamorhiza macrophylla MT Plant BS Balsamroot, Silky Balsamorhiza sericea CA Plant BS Balsamroot, Woolly Balsamorhiza hookeri var.
    [Show full text]
  • Papilio (New Series) #24 2016 Issn 2372-9449
    PAPILIO (NEW SERIES) #24 2016 ISSN 2372-9449 MEAD’S BUTTERFLIES IN COLORADO, 1871 by James A. Scott, Ph.D. in entomology, University of California Berkeley, 1972 (e-mail: [email protected]) Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………..……….……………….p. 1 Locations of Localities Mentioned Below…………………………………..……..……….p. 7 Summary of Butterflies Collected at Mead’s Major Localities………………….…..……..p. 8 Mead’s Butterflies, Sorted by Butterfly Species…………………………………………..p. 11 Diary of Mead’s Travels and Butterflies Collected……………………………….……….p. 43 Identity of Mead’s Field Names for Butterflies he Collected……………………….…….p. 64 Discussion and Conclusions………………………………………………….……………p. 66 Acknowledgments………………………………………………………….……………...p. 67 Literature Cited……………………………………………………………….………...….p. 67 Table 1………………………………………………………………………….………..….p. 6 Table 2……………………………………………………………………………………..p. 37 Introduction Theodore L. Mead (1852-1936) visited central Colorado from June to September 1871 to collect butterflies. Considerable effort has been spent trying to determine the identities of the butterflies he collected for his future father-in-law William Henry Edwards, and where he collected them. Brown (1956) tried to deduce his itinerary based on the specimens and the few letters etc. available to him then. Brown (1964-1987) designated lectotypes and neotypes for the names of the butterflies that William Henry Edwards described, including 24 based on Mead’s specimens. Brown & Brown (1996) published many later-discovered letters written by Mead describing his travels and collections. Calhoun (2013) purchased Mead’s journal and published Mead’s brief journal descriptions of his collecting efforts and his travels by stage and horseback and walking, and Calhoun commented on some of the butterflies he collected (especially lectotypes). Calhoun (2015a) published an abbreviated summary of Mead’s travels using those improved locations from the journal etc., and detailed the type localities of some of the butterflies named from Mead specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Tracking List
    Nevada Division of Natural Heritage Department of Conservation and Natural Resources 901 S. Stewart Street, Suite 5002, Carson City, Nevada 89701-5245 voice: (775) 684-2900 | fax: (775) 684-2909 | web: heritage.nv.gov At-Risk Plant and Animal Tracking List July 2021 The Nevada Division of Natural Heritage (NDNH) A separate list, the Plant and Animal Watch List, systematically curates information on Nevada's contains taxa that could become at-risk in the future. endangered, threatened, sensitive, rare, and at-risk plants and animals providing the most comprehensive Taxa on the At-Risk Plant and Animal Tracking List are source of information on Nevada’s imperiled organized by taxonomic group, and presented biodiversity. alphabetically by scientific name within each group. Currently, there are 639 Tracking List taxa: 285 plants, Nevada's health and economic well-being depend 209 invertebrates, 65 fishes, 9 amphibians, 7 reptiles, upon its biodiversity and wise land stewardship. This 27 birds, and 37 mammals. challenge increases as population and land-use pressures continue to grow. Nevada is among the top Documentation of population status, locations, or 10 states for both the diversity and the vulnerability of other updates or corrections for any of the taxa on its living heritage. With early planning and responsible this list are always welcome. Literature citations with development, economic growth and our biological taxonomic revisions and descriptions of new taxa are resources can coexist. NDNH is a central source for also appreciated. The Nevada Native Species Site information critical to achieving this balance. Survey Report form is available on our website under Management priorities for the state’s imperiled the Submit Data tab and is the preferred format for biodiversity are continually assessed, providing submitting information to NDNH.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated List of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 38: 1–549 (2010) Annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.38.383 MONOGRAPH www.pensoftonline.net/zookeys Launched to accelerate biodiversity research An annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada Gregory R. Pohl1, Gary G. Anweiler2, B. Christian Schmidt3, Norbert G. Kondla4 1 Editor-in-chief, co-author of introduction, and author of micromoths portions. Natural Resources Canada, Northern Forestry Centre, 5320 - 122 St., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6H 3S5 2 Co-author of macromoths portions. University of Alberta, E.H. Strickland Entomological Museum, Department of Biological Sciences, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E3 3 Co-author of introduction and macromoths portions. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, K.W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6 4 Author of butterfl ies portions. 242-6220 – 17 Ave. SE, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2A 0W6 Corresponding authors: Gregory R. Pohl ([email protected]), Gary G. Anweiler ([email protected]), B. Christian Schmidt ([email protected]), Norbert G. Kondla ([email protected]) Academic editor: Donald Lafontaine | Received 11 January 2010 | Accepted 7 February 2010 | Published 5 March 2010 Citation: Pohl GR, Anweiler GG, Schmidt BC, Kondla NG (2010) An annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Alberta, Canada. ZooKeys 38: 1–549. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.38.383 Abstract Th is checklist documents the 2367 Lepidoptera species reported to occur in the province of Alberta, Can- ada, based on examination of the major public insect collections in Alberta and the Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies Per Year, Determines How Long Before the by Dennis R
    species is bivoltine, meaning two broods per year, or univoltine, meaning only one brood Butterflies per year, determines how long before the By Dennis R. Skadsen pupa emerges as an adult butterfly. Butterflies are one of the most easily identified and well studied groups of insects. Most can be identified on the wing, and several field guides (second only to birds) are available to aid the observer in identifying both adult and larvae, learning where to find species, and flight periods of adults. The life history of butterflies, as with most insects, involves a complex series of changes known as metamorphosis. Adult females lay eggs, most often on or near a specific species of plant or plants which the larvae will feed on. A larva or caterpillar hatches from the egg. The main purpose of the larval stage of a butterfly’s life history is to eat and grow. Caterpillars often employ defense mechanisms to protect them from predators that include camouflage and warning coloration like the Mourning Cloak caterpillar (pg. 5). Monarch chrysalis (photo by Dennis Skadsen) In our area most species overwinter as pupae emerging as adults during late spring to early summer. A few species like the Mourning cloak overwinter as adults, hibernating in brush piles, under the bark of fallen or dying trees, and other sites that will keep the adult dry and protected from harsh winter conditions. One of the most recognizable butterflies, the Monarch is one of only a few species that migrates to a warmer climate to overwinter as an adult. Monarch caterpillar feeding on common Since some butterfly larvae are restricted to milkweed leaves (photo by Dennis Skadsen) feeding on certain plants, several species of butterflies are categorized as specialists.
    [Show full text]
  • Specimen Records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895
    Catalog: Oregon State Arthropod Collection 2019 Vol 3(2) Specimen records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895 Jon H. Shepard Paul C. Hammond Christopher J. Marshall Oregon State Arthropod Collection, Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis OR 97331 Cite this work, including the attached dataset, as: Shepard, J. S, P. C. Hammond, C. J. Marshall. 2019. Specimen records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895. Catalog: Oregon State Arthropod Collection 3(2). (beta version). http://dx.doi.org/10.5399/osu/cat_osac.3.2.4594 Introduction These records were generated using funds from the LepNet project (Seltmann) - a national effort to create digital records for North American Lepidoptera. The dataset published herein contains the label data for all North American specimens of Lycaenidae and Riodinidae residing at the Oregon State Arthropod Collection as of March 2019. A beta version of these data records will be made available on the OSAC server (http://osac.oregonstate.edu/IPT) at the time of this publication. The beta version will be replaced in the near future with an official release (version 1.0), which will be archived as a supplemental file to this paper. Methods Basic digitization protocols and metadata standards can be found in (Shepard et al. 2018). Identifications were confirmed by Jon Shepard and Paul Hammond prior to digitization. Nomenclature follows that of (Pelham 2008). Results The holdings in these two families are extensive. Combined, they make up 25,743 specimens (24,598 Lycanidae and 1145 Riodinidae).
    [Show full text]
  • Native Grasses Benefit Butterflies and Moths Diane M
    AFNR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE Native Grasses Benefit Butterflies and Moths Diane M. Narem and Mary H. Meyer more than three plant families (Bernays & NATIVE GRASSES AND LEPIDOPTERA Graham 1988). Native grasses are low maintenance, drought Studies in agricultural and urban landscapes tolerant plants that provide benefits to the have shown that patches with greater landscape, including minimizing soil erosion richness of native species had higher and increasing organic matter. Native grasses richness and abundance of butterflies (Ries also provide food and shelter for numerous et al. 2001; Collinge et al. 2003) and butterfly species of butterfly and moth larvae. These and moth larvae (Burghardt et al. 2008). caterpillars use the grasses in a variety of ways. Some species feed on them by boring into the stem, mining the inside of a leaf, or IMPORTANCE OF LEPIDOPTERA building a shelter using grass leaves and silk. Lepidoptera are an important part of the ecosystem: They are an important food source for rodents, bats, birds (particularly young birds), spiders and other insects They are pollinators of wild ecosystems. Terms: Lepidoptera - Order of insects that includes moths and butterflies Dakota skipper shelter in prairie dropseed plant literature review – a scholarly paper that IMPORTANT OF NATIVE PLANTS summarizes the current knowledge of a particular topic. Native plant species support more native graminoid – herbaceous plant with a grass-like Lepidoptera species as host and food plants morphology, includes grasses, sedges, and rushes than exotic plant species. This is partially due to the host-specificity of many species richness - the number of different species Lepidoptera that have evolved to feed on represented in an ecological community, certain species, genus, or families of plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Ts Denver Museum of Nature & Science Reports
    DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE REPORTS DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE REPORTS DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE & SCIENCE OF NATURE DENVER MUSEUM NUMBER 16, OCTOBER 11, 2019 SCIENCE.DMNS.ORG/MUSEUM-PUBLICATIONS Denver Museum of Nature & Science Reports 2001 Colorado Boulevard (Print) ISSN 2374-7730 Denver, CO 80205, U.S.A. Denver Museum of Nature & Science Reports (Online) ISSN 2374-7749 REPORTS • NUMBER 16 • OCTOBER 11, 2019 • NUMBER 16 OCTOBER Cover photo: Oreas Anglewing (Polygonia oreas nigrozephyrus Scott, 1984), Gregory Canyon, Boulder County, Colorado, USA, 2 October 1973, leg. Michael G. Pogue. Photo: Bob Livingston. The Denver Museum of Nature & Science Reports (ISSN Frank Krell, PhD, Editor and Production 2374-7730 [print], ISSN 2374-7749 [online]) is an open- access, non peer-reviewed scientifi c journal publishing papers about DMNS research, collections, or other Program and Abstracts Museum related topics, generally authored or co-authored 30th Annual Meeting by Museum staff or associates. Peer review will only be arranged on request of the authors. of the High Country Lepidopterists October 11–12, 2019 The journal is available online at science.dmns.org/ Museum-Publications free of charge. Paper copies Denver Museum of Nature & Science are available for purchase from our print-on-demand publisher Lulu (www.lulu.com). DMNS owns the copyright of the works published in the Reports, which are Frank-Thorsten Krell (Ed.) published under the Creative Commons Attribution Non- Commercial license. For commercial use of published
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada Butterflies and Their Biology to Forward Such for Inclusion in the Larger Study
    Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 39(2). 1985. 95-118 NEV ADA BUTTERFLIES: PRELIMINARY CHECKLIST AND DISTRIBUTION GEORGE T. AUSTIN Nevada State Museum and Historical Society, 700 Twin Lakes Drive, Las Vegas, Nevada 89107 ABSTRACT. The distribution by county of the 189 species (over 300 taxa) of but­ terflies occurring in Nevada is presented along with a list of species incorrectly recorded for the state. There are still large areas which are poorly or not collected. Nevada continues as one of the remaining unknown areas in our knowledge of butterfly distribution in North America. Although a com­ prehensive work on the state's butterflies is in preparation, there is sufficient demand for a preliminary checklist to justify the following. It is hoped this will stimulate those who have any data on Nevada butterflies and their biology to forward such for inclusion in the larger study. Studies of Nevada butterflies are hampered by a paucity of resident collectors, a large number of mountain and valley systems and vast areas with little or no access. Non-resident collectors usually funnel into known and well worked areas, and, although their data are valu­ able, large areas of the state remain uncollected. Intensive collecting, with emphasis on poorly known areas, over the past seven years by Nevada State Museum personnel and associates has gone far to clarify butterfly distribution within the state. The gaps in knowledge are now more narrowly identifiable and will be filled during the next few sea­ sons. There is no all encompassing treatment of Nevada's butterfly fauna. The only state list is an informal recent checklist of species (Harjes, 1980).
    [Show full text]