Rail Franchising: Government Response to the Committee's

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rail Franchising: Government Response to the Committee's House of Commons Transport Committee Rail franchising: Government Response to the Committee’s Ninth Report of Session 2016–17 Tenth Special Report of Session 2016–17 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 24 April 2017 HC 1145 Published on 26 April 2017 by authority of the House of Commons Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Transport and its associated public bodies. Current membership Mrs Louise Ellman MP (Labour (Co-op), Liverpool, Riverside) (Chair) Clive Efford MP (Labour, Eltham) Robert Flello MP (Labour, Stoke-on-Trent South) Karl McCartney MP (Conservative, Lincoln) Stewart Malcolm McDonald MP (Scottish National Party, Glasgow South) Mark Menzies MP (Conservative, Fylde) Huw Merriman MP (Conservative, Bexhill and Battle) Will Quince MP (Conservative, Colchester) Iain Stewart MP (Conservative, Milton Keynes South) Graham Stringer MP (Labour, Blackley and Broughton) Martin Vickers MP (Conservative, Cleethorpes) The following was also a member of the Committee during the inquiry: Mary Glindon MP (Labour, North Tyneside) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/transcom and in print by Order of the House. Evidence relating to this report is published on the inquiry publications page of the Committee’s website. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Gordon Clarke (Committee Clerk), Nehal Bradley-Depani (Second Clerk), James Clarke (Committee Specialist), Andrew Haylen (Committee Specialist), Daniel Moeller (Senior Committee Assistant), Michelle Owens (Committee Assistant) and Estelle Currie (Media Officer). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Transport Committee, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 3266; the Committee’s email address is [email protected]. Rail franchising: Government Response 1 Tenth Special Report The Transport Committee published its Ninth Report of Session 2016–17, Rail franchising (HC 66), on 5 February 2017. The Government’s response was received on 5 April 2017 and is appended to this report. In the Government response, the Committee’s recommendations appear in bold text and the Government’s responses are in plain text. The responses from the Office of Rail and Road and Network Rail are also appended to this report. Appendix 1: Government Response The Government welcomes this report from the Transport Select Committee, which sets out the findings of the latest in its series of five inter-related inquiries into the “future of rail”. This Government has made it very clear that our railways need to adapt and change in order to be able to cope with the growth that they have already experienced and that which lies ahead. This means continuing to deliver a steady programme of improvements, expanding the network to provide more trains, harnessing new digital technology to transform the way our railways work, and ensuring that the interests of passengers are kept firmly at the heart of industry decision making. The Committee’s series of inquiries into the future of franchising is a welcome contribution to that process. The process of rail franchising has evolved continuously since 1996 in order to keep pace with passenger expectations, market circumstances, technological advancements and, in particular, the challenge of serving the historic levels of passenger growth experienced under privatisation. The investment through franchising has contributed to the United Kingdom having one of the safest and fastest growing railways in Europe. Private sector rail companies have invested billions of their own money to give passengers more trains, more services and more seats, and in 2015 the NAO calculated that the three franchises competitively since the restart of the programme in 2013 had returned over £5bn to the Treasury – an 82% average increase in payments compared to forecasts of what the previous agreements would have delivered. Following a review of franchising by Richard Brown CBE in 2013, the Department for Transport implemented important and fundamental reforms that supported the successful award of 13 franchises in a little over three years. This achievement was recognised most recently by the Cabinet Office’s Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) who, following a review of its own, recognised that the Department has a well-established cycle for letting new franchises, extending existing franchises and managing contracts in-life. The IPA also recognised that there were sound processes for setting up project teams and that templates existed for the all necessary management tools and contract frameworks. Therefore, while the Government rejects the Committee’s premise that franchising is no longer fit for purpose, we do welcome a number of the report’s recommendations, several of which reflect work streams already underway at the Department for Transport. This 2 Rail franchising: Government Response illustrates the Government’s ongoing commitment to continuous improvement in the franchising process, with particular focus on efficiency, accountability, innovation and driving value for money for passenger and taxpayer alike. Passenger Rail Competition We recommend that the Department take steps to streamline bidding costs where possible; even if the effect of this on market interest is likely to be marginal. The Parent Company Guarantee is crucial in protecting the public purse and should not be removed or amended significantly. Wider reform is required, possibly through open access operators in appropriate areas, or creating smaller franchises, to attract new entrants into the market and promote competition in rail. Without change it is difficult to see how the current model will be sustainable in the longer term. (Paragraph 26) The Government agrees with this recommendation, as it recognises that there is value in streamlining franchise bidding costs wherever practical. As noted by the Committee the Government has already taken steps to address this issue, including by introducing the pre-qualification questionnaire passport. Where appropriate, the Government will continue to investigate other ways to streamline bidding costs, including considering the impact on bidding costs when reviewing future franchise market reforms. The Government also recognises the need to ensure that franchising remains attractive to bidders while securing a good deal for taxpayers. This is why we are introducing a new risk transfer mechanism for use on selected franchises: the “Forecast Revenue mechanism” (or “FRM”). This mechanism offers protection against shortfalls in revenue relative to the winning bidder’s bid revenue line, and ensures operators share revenue with the Government when revenue outperforms this forecast outside of predetermined variances. By applying FRM on franchises where traditional risk transfer mechanisms would otherwise generate unsustainably large PCS requirements, the Government can ensure that healthy competition is maintained for its franchises. More broadly the Government is committed to ensuring that passenger services are delivered in a way that is commercially sustainable and meets the needs of passengers and taxpayers and will set out its longer-term strategic approach to franchising in the forthcoming Rail Strategy. Our response on open access is set out under Recommendation 2, whilst our response on smaller franchises is set out under Recommendation 4. We recommend that the Department and the ORR work together, as they develop the financial framework for the railways over Control Period 6 (2019–24), to present a comprehensive set of reforms to track access charges. These reforms need to manage the differing requirements of OAOs and franchisees and ensure that operators, taxpayers and passengers get a fair deal. A specific proposal for a PSO levy should be put out to consultation over the next 12 months, so that a new regime can be introduced from April 2019. We further recommend that timetabling spaces for open access services are determined upfront during franchise development prior to the publication of Rail franchising: Government Response 3 the Invitation to Tender. This will provide the certainty that industry needs to plan, particularly at the bidding stage of franchising but it will also help to encourage OAOs. (Paragraph 42) The Government agrees with this recommendation. We recognise that open access has a role to support franchising in the delivery of passenger services, particularly in serving new markets and driving innovation. We fully agree with the Committee, and the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), that there need to be important reforms to create a fair, level playing field between open access and franchised operators. This will allow passengers to benefit from even greater competition, whilst protecting Government’s ability to support vital social services and to invest in the rail network on behalf of taxpayers and all rail users including freight. That is why we are working with the ORR as part of the Periodic Review 2018 process as they develop options for potentially reforming track access charges. We have been clear that we would like to see all operators
Recommended publications
  • United Kingdom-London: Railway Transport Prior Information Notice for a Public Service Contract
    United Kingdom-London: Railway transport Prior information notice for a public service contract Form for notification under Article 7(2) of Regulation 1370/2007, as amended by the Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 (Public Service Obligations in Transport) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020, to be published one year before the launch of the invitation to tender procedure or direct award on the Department’s website. Competent authorities may decide not to publish this information where a public service contract concerns an annual provision of less than 50 000 kilometres of public passenger transport services. Section I: Competent authority I.1 Name and addresses Department for Transport Great Minster House, 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR United Kingdom Contact person: E-mail: [email protected] NUTS code: UKI32 Westminster Internet address(es): Main address: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for-transport 2 I.2 Contract award on behalf of other competent authorities I.3 Communication Additional information can be obtained from the above-mentioned address I.4 Type of competent authority Ministry or any other national or federal authority, including their regional or local subdivisions Section II: Object II.1 Scope of the procurement II.1.1 Title Contract for West Coast Partnership Rail Services. Currently operated by First Trenitalia West Coast Rail Limited II.1.2 Main CPV code 60200000 Railway transport services II.1.3 Type of contract Services Areas covered by the public transport services: Rail transport services II.2 Description II.2.2 Additional CPV code(s) 60210000 Public transport services by railways II.2.3 Place of performance NUTS code: UKI LONDON NUTS code: UKD NORTH WEST (ENGLAND) NUTS code: UKG WEST MIDLANDS (ENGLAND) NUTS code: UKM SCOTLAND 3 NUTS code: UKL WALES NUTS code: UK UNITED KINGDOM NUTS code: UKJ SOUTH EAST (ENGLAND) Main site or place of performance: West Coast Partnership rail services link London Euston, the West Midlands, North West England, North Wales and Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Drivers'union
    The train ASLEF drivers’ union >>> Rail Franchise Handbook 2019 ASLEF Introduction Welcome to our new Rail Franchise Handbook. I hope you will find it as interesting, and useful, as I do and a valuable tool for the political and industrial work you do for our union. We put this handbook together to give our reps and decision makers the inside track on who really runs Britain’s railways, how they run our railways, and what they take out from our railway industry every year. Because we believe the facts and figures revealed in these pages show, with crystal clarity, the utter folly of our privatised, and fragmented, franchise system. A structure – set up by John Major, 25 years ago, and continued by Conservative governments ever since – that separates the wheels and steel and is underwritten by an enormous public subsidy from every taxpayer in this country, and sky high passenger fares, while tens of millions of pounds haemorrhage from the system into the pockets of shareholders in the form of profits and dividends, or increasingly due inefficiencies. In fact whilst the system has never worked for passengers or taxpayers, there are now signs that it doesn’t work for operators either. The franchising system has been put on hold for a couple of years now due to a lack of bidders. This means direct awards have been handed out leading to even less competition. So we now have a system that exists to maintain the system itself, not our railway. It isn’t true to say that all the train and freight operating fill the pockets of shareholders; some TOCs and FOCs are owned by public, not private, operators where shareholders do not skim the cream off the top of the milk.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Business Report PDF 3 MB
    Transport Delivery Committee Date 06 January 2020 Report title Rail Business Report Accountable Director Malcolm Holmes, Director of Rail, Transport for West Midlands Email [email protected] Tel 0121 214 7058 Accountable Tom Painter, Head of Rail Franchising and Employee Partnerships, West Midlands Rail Executive Email [email protected] Tel: 07432104161 Report has been Councillor Roger Lawrence – Lead Member Rail and considered by Metro Recommendation(s) for action or decision: The Transport Delivery Committee is recommended to: Note the content of the report 1.0 Purpose To provide an update relating to the performance, operation and delivery of rail services in the West Midlands including on rail operator partnership agreements and West Midlands Rail Executive (WMRE) activity. 2.0 Section A – Background 2.1 Transport for West Midlands (TfWM) and WMRE currently work to influence the management and delivery of rail services and projects. Page 1 of 9 [PUBLIC] 2.2 This report provides a summary of rail activity in the TfWM and wider WMRE areas between September and December 2019. 3.0 Section B – Williams Rail Review, West Coast Franchise and HS2 Williams Rail Review 3.1 Publication of the William’s Review has now been delayed until after the election. West Coast Franchise 3.2 The new (FirstGroup / FS Trenitalia) Avanti West Coast company replaced Virgin Trains as the operator of the West Coast franchise from Sunday 8th December. 3.3 The West Coast Partnership franchise connects important West Midlands centres such as Rugby, Coventry, Birmingham Airport/NEC, Birmingham, Sandwell & Dudley, Wolverhampton and Stafford with London, the North West and Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Dft West Coast Partnership -- Transform Scotland Briefing For
    DfT ‘West Coast Partnership’ Transform Scotland Briefing for Bidders 13 November 2017 1. About Transform Scotland 1.1. Transform Scotland is the national alliance for sustainable transport, bringing together organisations from the private, public and voluntary sectors. We campaign for a society where everyone can have their travel needs met within the limits of a transport system that is environmentally sustainable, socially inclusive and economically responsible. 2. Introduction and General Comments 2.1. Transform Scotland welcomes the opportunity to comment on this important new Partnership for the West Coast Main Line (WCML) and the subsequent introduction of HS2 services. Our comments are confined to journeys between Scotland and England and within Scotland. 2.2. We initially ofered comments on the West Coast refranchising in April 2011. Referring back to those earlier comments, much of what we asked for at the time remains to be delivered. However, it is pleasing to note that some aspects have already been delivered by the current franchise holder, Virgin Trains. In particular electric traction with tilt has been introduced on the Edinburgh and Glasgow to Birmingham routes. These trains have been extended to London, thereby directly serving many more destinations from Scotland, which has resulted in significant passenger growth on these routes. We also sought direct trains from Scotland to Liverpool; these are to be delivered, albeit by the TransPennine Express (TPE) franchise. 2.3. Looking ahead, it remains the case that this key rail route ofers tremendous potential for modal shift to rail from both plane and car. It is a telling fact that people in the UK fly more per head of population than anywhere else in the world – including the US.
    [Show full text]
  • Customer First Strategy
    First Greater Western Platform Validators (PVAL) Supporting Information Issued by: First Group IT Procurement st Date: 21 June 2021 Commercial in Confidence 1. Introduction 1.1 FirstGroup plc (FG) is the leading transport operator in the UK and North America. 1.2 “Our vision is to provide solutions for an increasingly congested world; keeping people moving and communities prospering.” 1.3 Our services help to create strong, vibrant and sustainable local economies and our opportunity is to be the provider of choice for our customers and communities. During the last year around 2 billion people relied on us to get to work, to education, to visit family and friends and much more and, each day, every one of our 100,000 employees works hard to delivery vitally important services to our passengers. 1.4 FG has five operating divisions: ▪ First Rail is the largest provider of passenger rail services in the UK operating around a quarter of the market. ▪ First Bus is one of the largest providers of bus services operating around one fifth of all local buses in a primarily deregulated market. ▪ First Student is the largest provider of student transport in North America. ▪ First Transit is one of the largest private sector providers of public transit management and contracting in North America. ▪ Greyhound is the only national provider of scheduled intercity coach transportation services in North America. 1.5 First Rail operates passenger rail services throughout the UK. Our passenger operations include regional, intercity and commuter services - Great Western Railway (GWR), South Western Railway (SWR), First TransPennine Express (FTPE) and Avanti West Coast (AWC).
    [Show full text]
  • The West Coast Partnership
    The West Coast Partnership What is it: What are we looking for: ●● The West Coast Partnership combines the ●● New entrants into the UK rail industry from other InterCity West Coast rail passenger services with sectors with a background of success in radically the development, design and initial operation of improving customer experience, particularly as a HS2 high speed services, offering bidding groups result of cutting edge innovation and technology. the opportunity to operate the existing flagship ●● A West Coast Partnership operator, with the InterCity West Coast franchise as well as to experience of operating high speed/traditional develop and introduce services on HS2 bringing train services and embedded innovation in in a new era of Rail travel for the UK. customer service from outside of the rail sector. ●● An opportunity to shape the future of customer ●● We need innovative thinkers to become involved service in the UK rail industry to create an in every aspect of development of the HS2 innovative, forward thinking passenger journey proposition including rolling stock design, experience with the introduction of HS2; technology, passenger communications and ●● The ICWC franchise runs long distance, intercity ticketing systems whilst also contributing to the train services between London and some of the improvement of Intercity West Coast rail services. biggest cities in the UK including Birmingham, ●● Through your involvement you could become a Manchester, Liverpool, Glasgow and Edinburgh. pioneer for the new age of rail travel that HS2 will ●● HS2 is the new north-south high speed railway deliver and that can genuinely be described as connecting London with the West Midlands for world leading, where the passenger continues to Phase 1 in 2026, before running onto Manchester, be at the forefront of thinking.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 9407 – First Trenitalia West Coast Rail/ West Coast Partnership Rail Franchise
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG Competition Case 9407 – First Trenitalia West Coast Rail/ West Coast Partnership Rail Franchise Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 4(4) Date: 18.09.2019 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 18.09.2019 C(2019) 6853 final PUBLIC VERSION In the published version of this decision, some information has been omitted pursuant to Article 17(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 concerning non-disclosure of business secrets and other confidential information. The omissions are shown thus […]. Where possible the information omitted has been replaced by ranges of figures or a general description. To the notifying parties To the Competition and Markets Authority in United Kingdom Subject: Case M.9407 – First Trenitalia West Coast Rail/ West Coast Partnership Rail Franchise Commission decision following a reasoned submission pursuant to Article 4(4) of Regulation No 139/20041 for referral of the case to the United Kingdom and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area2. Date of filing: 14.08.2019 Legal deadline for response of Member States: 5.09.2019 Legal deadline for the Commission decision under Article 4(4): 19.09.2019 Dear Sir or Madam, 1. INTRODUCTION (1) On 14 August 2019, the Commission received by means of a reasoned submission a referral request pursuant to Article 4(4) of the Merger Regulation (the “Reasoned 1 OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the 'Merger Regulation'). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ('TFEU') has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of 'Community' by 'Union' and 'common market' by 'internal market'.
    [Show full text]
  • West Coast Partnership Franchise Update PDF 129 KB
    LIVERPOOL CITY REGION COMBINED AUTHORITY To: The Chair and Members of the Transport Committee Meeting: 9 August 2018 Authority/Authorities Affected: All districts EXEMPT/CONFIDENTIAL ITEM: No REPORT OF MERSEYTRAVEL WEST COAST PARTNERSHIP FRANCHISE UPDATE 1. PURPOSE OF REPORT This report summarises officer engagement with the bidders for the West Coast Partnership franchise and outlines the forward timetable for franchise award and future engagement activities. Work has been ongoing for several months, culminating in ‘letters of support’ being submitted to the bidders during week commencing 2 July 2018. 2. RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the Transport Committee: (a) Note the content of the report; (b) Endorse the proposed future approach for officers to engage with the bid process and successful bidder; (c) Endorse the continued lobbying by Merseytravel and the Combined Authority for 2 trains per hour between Liverpool and London; (d) Seek the support of the Metro Mayor for the submission of a letter to the Secretary of State for Transport, highlighting the need for an improved service between Liverpool and London as soon as possible. 3. BACKGROUND 3.1 The West Coast Main Line provides important rail links between Liverpool City Region and other major cities in the UK. Significantly, Liverpool to London services provide direct business and leisure links between the two cities, in addition to providing connectivity to intermediate locations such as Crewe, Stafford and Milton Keynes. 3.2 The ability to reach London in just over 2 hours from Liverpool has helped the City Region to grow economically, with an ever increasing number of conferences held in the city and very positive trends in GVA growth, job growth and tourism.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Results
    1 Annual Results Year ended 28 April 2018 28 June 2018 2 Cautionary statement This document is solely for use in connection with a briefing on the group headed by Stagecoach Group plc (“the Group”). This document contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risk factors associated with, amongst other things, the economic and business circumstances occurring from time to time in the countries, sectors and markets in which the Group operates. It is believed that the expectations reflected in these statements are reasonable but they may be affected by a wide range of variables which could cause actual results to differ materially from those currently anticipated. No assurances can be given that the forward- looking statements in this presentation will be realised. The forward-looking statements reflect the knowledge and information available at the date of preparation. This document is not a full record of the presentation because it does not include comments made verbally by Stagecoach Group management or by others. 3 ROSS PATERSON FINANCE DIRECTOR 4 Good momentum in bus and rail Financial ▪ Adjusted EPS 22.3p (2017 restated: 23.3p) ▪ Basic EPS of 12.3p (2017: 5.5p) reflect exceptional charges ▪ Full year dividend per share rebased to 7.7p (2017: 11.9p) ▪ No significant change to our 2018/19 adjusted EPS expectation Bus & Coach ▪ Commercial and technology-led initiatives to drive growth ▪ UK bus pricing and network changes delivering improved revenue per vehicle mile ▪ Moderating capital investment following several years of
    [Show full text]
  • Firstgroup and Trenitalia Announce New Managing Directors for West Coast Partnership Rail Franchise
    FirstGroup and Trenitalia Announce New Managing Directors For West Coast Partnership Rail Franchise November 26, 2019 FirstGroup and Trenitalia, the transport companies that will jointly take over the running of the West Coast Partnership on 8 December, today announced the appointment of two Managing Directors. Phil Whittingham, Managing Director of Virgin Trains since 2013, will now become Managing Director of the InterCity West Coast business, running passenger rail services between London, the Midlands, North West, Scotland and North Wales. In this role, he will manage a company that will oversee a substantial programme of investment in new and refurbished trains, improved stations and additional services and capacity. Phil joined Virgin Trains in 1999 as Group Management Accountant having worked closely with the company while working as an accountant at KPMG from 1996. He was appointed Finance Director in 2007 before taking over as Managing Director in 2013. Caroline Donaldson, currently Bid Director at FirstGroup, will become the Managing Director of the West Coast Partnership Development that will provide a range of design and development services to support the future operation of high-speed rail services between the North and London in close collaboration with HS2 Ltd and the Department for Transport. As Bid Director, Caroline steered FirstGroup and Trenitalia’s successful joint bid for the partnership. She has been Bid Director for FirstGroup since 2010, and previously held various positions across the transport sector, including senior positions at Network Rail and London Underground. She is a Chartered Accountant, and holds a degree in Mathematics from Cambridge University and an MBA from Cranfield School of Management.
    [Show full text]
  • Avanti West Coast
    Avanti West Coast 6 February 2020 2 The West Coast Partnership ▪ A collaboration between operator (FT), infrastructure provider (HS2) and government (DfT) in order to deliver an Carlisle Penrith North Lakes industry changing investment programme. Oxenholme Lancaster Wigan North Western Runcorn Stockport Warrington ▪ Three phases: BQ Macclesfield 1. Operate and improve Avanti West Coast services from December 2019 2. Shape future HS2 and West Coast services 3. Run the first HS2 services from 2026, alongside West Coast services for 5 years ▪ HS2 will run from: ▪ London to Birmingham (phase 1) and Rugby ▪ Crewe (Phase 2a). ▪ Phase 2b will see the HS2 reach 3 Manchester, Sheffield and Leeds WCP Structure West Coast Partnership CEO Steve Montgomery (temp) Avanti West Coast Partnership & Strategy West Coast Partnership Directorate Development (ShOp) MD Director MD Phil Whittingham Richard Scott Caroline Donaldson 4 West Coast Partnership Development (WCPD - Shadow Operator) Ten years’ experience with Ferrovie Group, Trenitalia’s parent company and the only HS operator in the world operating in a competitive market • We have established a Partnership Protocol with HS2 • Access to over 500 experts within FirstGroup Trenitalia’s businesses, covering: • High Speed • Commercial • Programme Management • Technical expertise • Detailed, resourced and assured plans • As Shadow Operator we will be an objective critical friend • Bringing solutions not problems • The conduit for close and effective collaboration with stakeholders on HS2 development 5 Partnership
    [Show full text]
  • West Coast Main Line Capacity Enhancement Plan
    OFFICIAL WCML South Capacity Enhancement Plan Report 07-May 2021 West Coast Main Line South Capacity Enhancement Plan Report Network Rail, Northwest and Central Region Author: Matt Jones (Senior Strategic Planner, NW&C) Date: 07-May 2021 Version: 1.0 Reviewed by: Carew Satchwell (Head of Strategic Planning, NW&C) Chris Cole (Lead Strategic Planner, NW&C) Michelle Woolmore (Route Contract Manager, NW&C) Adrian Bocking (Systems Integration Manager, NW&C) Peter Northfield (Programme Manager, System Operator) Contents Part A: Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Part B: Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 3 B.01: Background........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 B.02: Purpose ............................................................................................................................................................................... 4 B.03: Consultation with interested parties ......................................................................................................................... 4 Part C: Factors Driving Congestion ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]