DOCSLIB.ORG

Consonant Quantity and Positional Neutralisation Heusler's Law And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Consonant Quantity and Positional Neutralisation Heusler's Law And Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2020 Consonant Quantity and Positional Neutralisation – Heusler’s Law and Winteler’s Law in Zurich German Würth, Kathrin Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-186455 Dissertation Published Version Originally published at: Würth, Kathrin. Consonant Quantity and Positional Neutralisation – Heusler’s Law and Winteler’s Law in Zurich German. 2020, University of Zurich, Faculty of Arts. Consonant Quantity and Positional Neutralisation Heusler’s Law and Winteler’s Law in Zurich German Thesis presented to the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences of the University of Zurich for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Kathrin Würth Accepted in the spring semester 2019 on the recommendation of Prof. Dr. Stephan Schmid and Prof. Dr. Elvira Glaser Zurich, 2020 Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 6 1. Preliminary remarks on Zurich German ...................................................................... 10 1.1. Linguistic classification ........................................................................................ 10 1.2. Zurich German: sub-varieties and neighbouring dialects ..................................... 12 1.3. Sociolinguistic status ........................................................................................... 14 1.4. Literature on Swiss German dialects ................................................................... 16 2. The Zurich German sound system ............................................................................. 18 2.1. A preliminary note on the transcription................................................................. 18 2.2. Vowels................................................................................................................. 20 2.3. Consonants ......................................................................................................... 22 2.3.1. Obstruents ........................................................................................................... 23 2.3.2. Sonorant consonants ........................................................................................... 27 2.4. Phonological processes ....................................................................................... 40 2.4.1. Assimilation ......................................................................................................... 41 2.4.2. Linking-n .............................................................................................................. 44 2.4.3. Heusler’s Law ...................................................................................................... 45 2.4.4. Winteler’s Law ..................................................................................................... 48 2.4.5. Monosyllabic Lengthening ................................................................................... 52 2.5. Summary ............................................................................................................. 53 3. The fortis/lenis distinction ........................................................................................... 55 3.1. fortis/lenis: from Winteler to the SPE ................................................................... 56 3.2. Alternatives to the feature pair fortis/lenis (Lisker & Abramson 1964) .................. 59 3.3. fortis/lenis as a durational contrast ...................................................................... 62 3.4. Summary ............................................................................................................. 64 4. Geminates .................................................................................................................. 66 4.1. On the term “geminate” ....................................................................................... 67 4.2. On the representation of geminates ..................................................................... 68 4.2.1. Length vs weight ................................................................................................. 73 4.3. Zurich German geminates ................................................................................... 88 2 Contents 4.3.1. Monosyllabic lengthening (MSL) and word minimality .......................................... 91 4.3.2. Additional evidence for moraic consonants in Zurich German ............................. 97 4.3.3. Onset geminates? ............................................................................................... 99 4.4. Zurich German syllable structure and syllabification ...........................................103 4.5. Summary ............................................................................................................109 5. Neutralisation ............................................................................................................111 5.1. Key concepts of neutralisation ............................................................................111 5.1.1. Trubetzkoy and the archiphoneme .....................................................................112 5.1.2. Constraint-based approaches .............................................................................117 5.1.3. Incomplete neutralisation ....................................................................................119 5.1.4. On the function of neutralisation: Silverman (2012) ............................................123 5.1.5. Summary ............................................................................................................125 5.2. Neutralisation of suprasegmental contrasts ........................................................126 5.2.1. Heusler’s Law in a segmental analysis ...............................................................127 5.2.2. Heusler’s Law as prosodic neutralisation ............................................................130 5.2.3. Neutralisation in a skeletal framework: Kraehenmann (2003) .............................131 5.2.4. Neutralisation in Moraic Theory ..........................................................................139 5.2.5. Summary ............................................................................................................153 6. Phonetic measurements ............................................................................................157 6.1. Previous studies .................................................................................................158 6.2. Method ...............................................................................................................164 6.2.1. Research questions ............................................................................................164 6.2.2. Speakers ............................................................................................................168 6.2.3. Corpus................................................................................................................169 6.2.4. Recordings and data analysis .............................................................................170 6.3. Results ...............................................................................................................175 6.3.1. Stops ..................................................................................................................176 6.3.2. Fricatives ............................................................................................................203 6.3.3. Summary Heusler’s Law .....................................................................................218 6.3.4. Sonorants ...........................................................................................................220 6.3.5. Summary Winteler’s Law ....................................................................................231 7. Conclusion ................................................................................................................234 References .........................................................................................................................238 Contents 3 List of Tables ......................................................................................................................257 List of Figures .....................................................................................................................259 Appendix ...........................................................................................................................261 I. Estimates ..................................................................................................................262 i. Stops ..................................................................................................................262 ii. Fricatives ............................................................................................................265 iii. Sonorants ...........................................................................................................266 II. Word list ....................................................................................................................268
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Crosslinguistic Approach to Double Nominative and Biabsolutive Constructions
    A Crosslinguistic Approach to Double Nominative and Biabsolutive Constructions: Evidence from Korean and Daghestanian∗ Andrei Antonenko1 and Jisung Sun2 Stony Brook University1,2 1. Introduction Distribution of case among distinct grammatical relations is one of the most frequently studied topics in the syntactic theory. Canonical cases are, in accusative languages, subjects of both intransitive and transitive verbs being nominative, while direct objects of transitive verbs are usually marked accusative. In ergative languages, subjects of intransitive verbs share properties with direct objects of transitive verbs, and are marked absolutive. Subjects of transitive verbs are usually ergative. When you look into world languages, however, there are ‘non-canonical’ case patterns too. Probably the most extreme kind of non-canonical case system would be so-called Quirky Subject constructions in Icelandic (see Sigurðsson 2002). This paper concerns constructions, in which two nominals are identically case-marked in a clause, as observed in Korean and Daghestanian languages. Daghestanian languages belong to Nakh-Daghestanian branch of North Caucasian family. Nakh-Daghestanian languages are informally divided into Nakh languages, such as Chechen and Ingush, spoken in Chechnya and the Republic of Ingushetia, respectively; and Daghestanian languages, spoken in the Republic of Daghestan. Those regions are located in the Caucasian part of Russian Federation. Some Daghestanian languages are also spoken in Azerbaijan and Georgia. This study focuses on Daghestanian languages, such as Archi, Avar, Dargwa, Hinuq, Khwarshi, Lak and Tsez, due to similar behaviors of them with respect to the described phenomenon. 2. Ergativity in Daghestanian Aldridge (2004) proposes that there are two types of syntactically ergative languages, based on which argument is performing functions typical for subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/30/2021 10:48:31PM Via Free Access
    journal of language contact 11 (2018) 71-112 brill.com/jlc The Development of Phonological Stratification: Evidence from Stop Voicing Perception in Gurindji Kriol and Roper Kriol Jesse Stewart University of Saskatchewan [email protected] Felicity Meakins University of Queensland [email protected] Cassandra Algy Karungkarni Arts [email protected] Angelina Joshua Ngukurr Language Centre [email protected] Abstract This study tests the effect of multilingualism and language contact on consonant perception. Here, we explore the emergence of phonological stratification using two alternative forced-choice (2afc) identification task experiments to test listener perception of stop voicing with contrasting minimal pairs modified along a 10-step continuum. We examine a unique language ecology consisting of three languages spo- ken in Northern Territory, Australia: Roper Kriol (an English-lexifier creole language), Gurindji (Pama-Nyungan), and Gurindji Kriol (a mixed language derived from Gurindji and Kriol). In addition, this study focuses on three distinct age groups: children (group i, 8>), preteens to middle-aged adults (group ii, 10–58), and older adults (group iii, 65+). Results reveal that both Kriol and Gurindji Kriol listeners in group ii contrast the labial series [p] and [b]. Contrarily, while alveolar [t] and velar [k] were consis- tently identifiable by the majority of participants (74%), their voiced counterparts ([d] and [g]) showed random response patterns by 61% of the participants. Responses © Jesse Stewart et al., 2018 | doi 10.1163/19552629-01101003 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the prevailing cc-by-nc license at the time of publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Trubetzkoy Final
    Chapman, S. & Routledge, P. (eds) (2005) Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Pp 267-268. Trubetzkoy, N.S. (Nikolai Sergeevich); (b. 1890, d. 1938; Russian), lecturer at Moscow University (1915-1916), Rostov-on-Don University (1918), Sofia University (1920-1922), finally professor of Slavic linguistics at Vienna University (1922-1938). One of the founding fathers of phonology and a key theorist of the Prague School. (See Also: *Jakobson, Roman; *Martinet, André). Trubetzkoy’s life was blighted by persecution. Born in Moscow of aristocratic, academic parents, Trubetzkoy (whose names have been transliterated variously) was a prince, and, after study and an immediate start to a university career in Moscow, he was forced to flee by the 1917 revolution; he subsequently also had to leave Rostov and Sofia. On settling in Vienna, he became a geographically distant member of the Prague Linguistic Circle. It is at times difficult to tease his ideas apart from those of his friend *Jakobson, who ensured that his nearly-finished Grundzüge der Phonologie (1939) was posthumously published. Trubetzkoy had previously published substantial work in several fields, but this was his magnum opus. It summarised his previous phonological work and stands now as the classic statement of Prague School phonology, setting out an array of phonological ideas, several of which still characterise debate on phonological representations. Through it, the publications which preceded it, his work at conferences and general enthusiastic networking, Trubetzkoy was crucial in the development of phonology as a discipline distinct from phonetics, and the change in phonological focus from diachrony to synchrony.
    [Show full text]
  • A North Caucasian Etymological Dictionary
    S. L. Nikolayev S. A. Starostin A NORTH CAUCASIAN ETYMOLOGICAL DICTIONARY Edited by S. A. Starostin ***************** ****************ASTERISK PUBLISHERS * Moscow * 1994 The two volumes contain a systematic reconstruction of the phonology and vocabulary of Proto-North-Caucasian - the ancestor of numerous modern languages of the Northern Caucasus, as well as of some extinct languages of ancient Anatolia. Created by two leading Russian specialists in linguistic prehistory, the book will be valuable for all specialists in comparative linguistics and history of ancient Near East and Europe. © S. L. Nikolayev, S. A. Starostin 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS Editor' s foreword. , . Preface List of abbreviations Literature I ntr oduct ion Dictionary ? . 200 9 . 236 5 . , . ..............242 a' i ... ' 252 a ............. 275 b ...... 285 c 322 c 3 3 L t ^39 C 352 £ 376 : 381 d 397 e 409 4 2 5 Y 474 B 477 h 48 5 h 5 00 h 5 0 3 H 342 i 625 i 669 j '. 6 7 3 k. 68 7 fc 715 I 7 4 2 1 : .... 7 5 4 X. ! 7 5 8 X ; 766 X 7 7 3 L 7 86 t. ' 7 87 n 844 o. 859 p. 865 p. 878 q . 882 q 907 r. ..... 943 s... i 958 s. 973 S. 980 t . 990 t 995 ft. ...... 1009 u 1010 u 1013 V 1016 w. 1039 x 1060 X. ........ 1067 z. ... 1084 z 1086 2. 1089 3 1 090 3 1101 5 1105 I ndices. 1111 5 EDITOR'S FOREWORD This dictionary has a long history. The idea of composing it was already ripe in 1979, and the basic cardfiles were composed in 1980-1983, during long winter months of our collaboration with S.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Testing of the Functional Load Hypothesis and Implications for Phonological Theory Keywords: Functional Load, Merger, Language Change
    Statistical testing of the functional load hypothesis and implications for phonological theory keywords: functional load, merger, language change The idea that phonological neutralization is constrained by the communicative function of lexical contrast has a long history (e.g., Trubetzkoy 1939, Martinet 1955, Hockett 1967). A few case-studies have asked whether occurring neutralizations have a lower impact on lexical contrast than non-occurring ones, either by creating fewer homophones (e.g., Silverman 2010, Kaplan in press) or by incurring a relatively small drop in lexical-level entropy (Surendran and Niyogi 2006). Results have been mixed: some case-studies are consistent with the functional load account (Silverman 2010, Kaplan in press) while others contradict it (e.g., King 1967) or are judged inconclusive (e.g. Surendran & Niyogi 2006). However, if functional load is just one of many influences on sound change we would expect to find many individual ‘counter- examples’ to the functional load hypothesis. Consequently, we need a set of case-studies that can be assessed jointly using statistical methods. As part of an ongoing investigation of relationships between functional load and contrast neutralization, we are building a database of diachronically recent mergers in languages for which there exist frequency-coded phonemic word lists. The database currently includes data related to forty distinct mergers occurring in German, French, Korean, and several varieties of English. This data reveals a statistically significant difference between the distributions of these mergers versus comparable non-occurring mergers, in three measures of the functional load for phonemic oppositions: changes in homophony, lexical entropy and segmental entropy.
    [Show full text]
  • Stress Chapter
    Word stress in the languages of the Caucasus1 Lena Borise 1. Introduction Languages of the Caucasus exhibit impressive diversity when it comes to word stress. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of the stress systems in North-West Caucasian (henceforth NWC), Nakh-Dagestanian (ND), and Kartvelian languages, as well as the larger Indo-European (IE) languages of the area, Ossetic and (Eastern) Armenian. For most of these languages, stress facts have only been partially described and analyzed, which raises the question about whether the available data can be used in more theoretically-oriented studies; cf. de Lacy (2014). Instrumental studies are not numerous either. Therefore, the current chapter relies mainly on impressionistic observations, and reflects the state of the art in the study of stress in these languages: there are still more questions than answers. The hope is that the present summary of the existing research can serve as a starting point for future investigations. This chapter is structured as follows. Section 2 describes languages that have free stress placement – i.e., languages in which stress placement is not predicted by phonological or morphological factors. Section 3 describes languages with fixed stress. These categories are not mutually exclusive, however. The classification of stress systems is best thought of as a continuum, with fixed stress and free stress languages as the two extremes, and most languages falling in the space between them. Many languages with fixed stress allow for exceptions based on certain phonological and/or morphological factors, so that often no firm line can be drawn between, e.g., languages with fixed stress that contain numerous morphologically conditioned exceptions (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley Dissertations, Department of Linguistics
    UC Berkeley Dissertations, Department of Linguistics Title Relationship between Perceptual Accuracy and Information Measures: A cross-linguistic Study Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7tx5t8bt Author Kang, Shinae Publication Date 2015 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Relationship between perceptual accuracy and information measures: A cross-linguistic study by Shinae Kang A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Keith A. Johnson, Chair Professor Sharon Inkelas Professor Susan S. Lin Professor Robert T. Knight Fall 2015 Relationship between perceptual accuracy and information measures: A cross-linguistic study Copyright 2015 by Shinae Kang 1 Abstract Relationship between perceptual accuracy and information measures: A cross-linguistic study by Shinae Kang Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics University of California, Berkeley Professor Keith A. Johnson, Chair The current dissertation studies how the information conveyed by different speech el- ements of English, Japanese and Korean correlates with perceptual accuracy. Two well- established information measures are used: weighted negative contextual predictability (in- formativity) of a speech element; and the contribution of a speech element to syllable differ- entiation, or functional load. This dissertation finds that the correlation between information and perceptual accuracy differs depending on both the type of information measure and the language of the listener. To compute the information measures, Chapter 2 introduces a new corpus consisting of all the possible syllables for each of the three languages. The chapter shows that the two information measures are inversely correlated.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Load, Token Frequency, and Contact-Induced Change in Toronto Heritage Cantonese Vowels
    St. Catherine University From the SelectedWorks of Holman Tse, PhD January 2, 2020 Functional load, token frequency, and contact- induced change in Toronto Heritage Cantonese vowels Holman Tse, St. Catherine University Creative CommonThis sL wicorke nis sliceensed under a Creative Commons CC_BY-NC-ND International License. Available at: https://works.bepress.com/holman-tse/8/ Functional load, token frequency, and contact-induced change in Toronto Heritage Cantonese vowels Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting January 2, 2020 New Orleans, LA Holman Tse, PhD Dept. of English and International HERITAGE LANGUAGE VARIATION AND CHANGE IN TORONTO Languages HTTP://PROJECTS.CHASS.UTORONTO.CA/NGN/HLVC St. Paul, MN 55105 [email protected] https://holmantse.github.io/ Introduction: Heritage Languages • “Phonetics and phonology remain among the least understood properties of heritage languages” (Polinsky 2018: 162) • Defined as “culturally or ethnolinguistically minority languages that develop in a bilingual setting where another sociopolitically majority language is spoken” (Montrul 2015:2) • Ex: Cantonese is a minority language in Toronto, Canada where English is the sociopolitically majority language • Presentation focus: • Vowel production among Toronto Heritage Cantonese speakers • Can functional load account for which vowels are more susceptible to loss of contrast (merger)? • /y/ (high front round) ~ /u/ (high back round)? • ex: [kyn35] 捲 ‘roll’ vs. [kun35] 官 ‘public building’ • /a/ (low central) ~ /ɔ/ (open ‘o’)? • Ex: [sa55] 沙 ‘sand’
    [Show full text]
  • Sounds Difficult? Why Phonological Theory Needs 'Ease of Articulation'
    SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics Vol. 14 (2006): 207-226 Sounds difficult? Why phonological theory needs ‘ease of articulation’ David Shariatmadari [email protected] Introduction In this paper I will try to show that theories of phonological structure must incorporate some measure of phonetic naturalness, specifically the idea that there exists a tendency to conserve energy in the use of the articulatory organs, with ‘easy’ sounds being those that require less physical effort to produce on the part of the speaker. I will call this the Ease of Articulation Hypothesis (EoA) 1. A strong form of EoA would state that articulatory phonetics is the sole motivating factor for sound patterns including the structure of phonemic inventories, phonotactics and morphophonemic variation. This is clearly false. If it were the case, phonology would be indistinguishable from phonetics. There would be no reason for a given phonological process not to apply in all languages, since all human beings have the same vocal apparatus and what is phonetically natural for a speaker of Turkish must also be phonetically natural for a speaker of Japanese. And yet, there are clearly many phonological differences between these two, and among all other languages. In contrast, a weak version of EoA might hold that articulation is one of a number of pressures competing for influence over the shape of the speech string. Some of the time it will win out. Whether or not it does depends, crucially, on the structure of the language concerned. Since every language has a different structure, the way in which phonetic influence is felt will be different for every language.
    [Show full text]
  • A Note on the Prague School Jun Qian
    The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics NUMBER 87 JUNE 2007 71–86 A Note on the Prague School Jun Qian Abstract e 80th anniversary of the Prague Linguistic Circle offers an occasion to think about how to docu- ment the Prague School related events, how to keep whatever related to the Prague School, and how to make the Prague School resources easily accessible. In the following I will first chronologically list some Prague School related events in the past ten years (1996–2006). en I will refer to several personal com- munications as related to certain aspects of the Prague School theory. Finally I will propose when faced with this age of globalization and digitization what can be done so as to maximally utilize the Prague School resources. e following chronological list of Prague School related events are highly selective. Under the heading of the year are listed the events that occurred in that year. 1996 (1) From March 28 to 30, 1996, an international conference was held in Prague to celebrate the 70th anniversary of the Prague Linguistic Circle and to commemorate the centenary of the birth of Roman Jakobson. Some of the papers presented at this conference are included in Prague Linguistic Circle Papers Volume 3 (1999).1 (2) Professor Josef Vachek (1909–1996) passed away on March 31. He was probably the last of the pre-war Prague School members. e international linguistic community’s knowledge of the Prague School is largely due to his persistent effort (e.g. Vachek 1960, 1964a-b, 1966, 1968, 1983; Mathesius 1975).
    [Show full text]
  • Archi Language Tutorial Powerpoint
    LAGB 2008 ARCHI LANGUAGE TUTORIAL Marina Chumakina Greville G. Corbett Dunstan Brown Surrey Morphology Group The support of ELDP and of the ESRC is gratefully acknowledged. INTRODUCTION • Archi: special language • a special place • previous research • a special dictionary • the Workshop 2 3 4 Korjakov (2006 : map 10) 5 East Caucasian (=Northeast Caucasian, =Nakh-Daghestanian) Nakh Avar Andic Tsezic Lak Dargi Lezgic Khinalugh Chechen-Ingush Avar Akhvakh Bezhta Lak Dargi Archi Khinalugh Chechen Andi Hinuq Nuclear Lezgic Ingush Bagwalal Hunzib Aghul Tsova-Tush (=Batsbi) Botlikh Khvarshi Budukh Chamalal Tsez(=Dido) Kryz Godoberi Lezgian Karata Rutul Tindi Tabassaran Tsakhur Udi Sources: Ethnologue, Comrie (2008) 9 recent surveys of Daghestanian languages • van den Berg (2005) • Comrie (2008) 10 Archi phonology outline 1. Vowels 2. Consonants: • primary articulation (manner and place) • secondary articulation (ejectiveness, labialisation, fortis / lenis distinction) • pharyngealisation: secondary articulation or prosody? 11 vowels front central back high i / iː u /uː middle e / eː ǝ o /oː low a / aː (1) ʁiniš ʁiniːš from there from there higher than the speaker higher and way away from the speaker 12 consonants bilabial dental alveolar palatal velar plosive p b t d k g nasal m n trill r fricative s z š ž affricate c č approx w j lateral approx l 13 consonants bilabial dental alveolar palatal velar uvular pharyngeal laryngeal plosive p bt d k g q ʕ ʔ nasal m n trill r fricative s z š ž χ ʁ ħ h affricate c č approx w j lateral l approx 14 consonants
    [Show full text]
  • Schiffman, Harold F. TITLE Language and Society in South Asia. Final Report
    DOCUMEKT RESUNE ED 127 806 PL 007 948 AUTHOR Shapiro, Michael C.; Schiffman, Harold F. TITLE Language and Society in South Asia. Final Report. INSTITUTION Institute of International Studies (DHEW/OE), Washington, D.C. BUREAU NO BR-110012HH PUB DATE Sep 75 CONTRACT OEC-0-74-2093 NOTE 380p. EDRS PRICE MF-$C.83 Hc-$20.75 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Asian Studies; *Bilingualism; Burmese; Cultural Context; *Dialects; Dialect Studies; Dravidian Languages; Language Classification; *Language Variation; Linguistic Borrowing; Multilingualism; Regional Dialects; Social Dialects; *Sociolinguistics; Tibetan IDENTIFIERS *Asia (South); *Code Switching; Indo Aryan Languages; Munda Languages; Tibeto Burman Languages ABSTRACT This work attempts to provide an overview of liuguistic diversity in South Asia and to place this diversity in a cultural context. The work tries to describe the current state of knowledge concerning socially conditioned language variation in the subcontinent. Each of five major language families contains numerous mutually intelligible and unintelligible dialects. Different dialects of a language may be required for 'written and spoken use and for different social groups. Bilingualism and multilingualism are common for communication between groups. Language choice is important for education, politics, radio and television. Chapter 2 of this book enumerates criteria used in the taxonomy of language forms, discussing a number of theories of dialect formation from the points of view of linguistic innovation and diffusion of linguistic change. Chapter 3 surveys literature on classification of South Asian languages. Chapter 4 considers South Asia as a distinct linguistic area and Chapter 5 evaluates literature on South Asian social dialects. Chapter 6 examines linguistic codes encompassing elements from more than one autonomous language.
    [Show full text]