Functional Load, Token Frequency, and Contact-Induced Change in Toronto Heritage Cantonese Vowels

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Functional Load, Token Frequency, and Contact-Induced Change in Toronto Heritage Cantonese Vowels St. Catherine University From the SelectedWorks of Holman Tse, PhD January 2, 2020 Functional load, token frequency, and contact- induced change in Toronto Heritage Cantonese vowels Holman Tse, St. Catherine University Creative CommonThis sL wicorke nis sliceensed under a Creative Commons CC_BY-NC-ND International License. Available at: https://works.bepress.com/holman-tse/8/ Functional load, token frequency, and contact-induced change in Toronto Heritage Cantonese vowels Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting January 2, 2020 New Orleans, LA Holman Tse, PhD Dept. of English and International HERITAGE LANGUAGE VARIATION AND CHANGE IN TORONTO Languages HTTP://PROJECTS.CHASS.UTORONTO.CA/NGN/HLVC St. Paul, MN 55105 [email protected] https://holmantse.github.io/ Introduction: Heritage Languages • “Phonetics and phonology remain among the least understood properties of heritage languages” (Polinsky 2018: 162) • Defined as “culturally or ethnolinguistically minority languages that develop in a bilingual setting where another sociopolitically majority language is spoken” (Montrul 2015:2) • Ex: Cantonese is a minority language in Toronto, Canada where English is the sociopolitically majority language • Presentation focus: • Vowel production among Toronto Heritage Cantonese speakers • Can functional load account for which vowels are more susceptible to loss of contrast (merger)? • /y/ (high front round) ~ /u/ (high back round)? • ex: [kyn35] 捲 ‘roll’ vs. [kun35] 官 ‘public building’ • /a/ (low central) ~ /ɔ/ (open ‘o’)? • Ex: [sa55] 沙 ‘sand’ vs. [sɔ55] 梳 ‘comb’ Previous Research on Heritage Speaker Vowels • Examples of previously investigated Languages • Western Armenian (Godson 2004) • Korean (Baker & Trofimovich 2005) • Arabic (Saadah 2011) • Mandarin (Chang et al. 2011, Yang 2014) • Spanish (Ronquest 2013) • Cantonese (Tse 2016a, 2016b) • Generally show maintenance of baseline vowel distinctions in each heritage language examined • Some low-level phonetic differences (ex: vowel shifting) observed but none lead to mergers or loss of distinctions • May have to do with access to two distinct phonological systems among early bilinguals (Polinsky 2018) A counter example? • Evidence of /y/ (high front round) and /u/ (high back round) merger for a subset of Toronto Heritage Cantonese speakers (Tse 2019a) 1. Why this subset of speakers? • Speakers with lower proficiency proxy scores more likely to merge (Tse 2019a) 2. Why /y/ and /u/ and not other vowel pairs such as /a/ vs. /ɔ/? • Proposal: Functional load differences mediated by contact with English PRESENTATION FOCUS Contact-induced Merger of /y/ ~ /u/? Cantonese Tense Vowels Toronto English Vowel System ????????? Cantonese has two high round tense vowels English has only one high round tense vowel (phonetically fronted) Does English influence on Cantonese mean change towards loss of /y/ vs. /u/ contrast? 5 Contact-induced Merger of /a/ ~ /ɔ/? Cantonese Vowel System Toronto English Vowel System ????????? Cantonese has /a/ ~ /ɔ/ contrast LOT /ɑ/ = THOUGHT /ɔ/ Does English influence on Cantonese mean change towards loss of /ɔ/ ~ /a/? 6 Is it because of functional load differences? • Functional load: “the idea that change in a system of phonemes is related to their role in information transmission” (Wedel et al 2013) • Three ways in which functional load can be operationalized 1. Number of minimal pairs distinguishing two phonemes THIS PRESENTATION 2. Lexical frequency of each phoneme 3. System entropy (change in the probabilistic in occurrence of minimal pairs and of each phoneme before and after a given merger) • Thus, fewer minimal pairs, lower lexical frequency, and lower change in system entropy favor phonemic mergers because of less information loss The Data • HLVC (Heritage Language Variation and Change) Project Corpus (Nagy 2011) • Digital recordings (.wav) of: 1. hour-long sociolinguistic interviews (spontaneous speech sample) 2. Ethnic Orientation Questionnaire responses 3. picture naming task responses • Vowel tokens measured for F1/F2 from all three sets of recordings • Lexical frequency information based on occurrence in interviews HERITAGE LANGUAGE VARIATION AND CHANGE IN TORONTO HTTP://PROJECTS.CHASS.UTORONTO.CA/NGN/HLVC 8 Speakers Analyzed (n = 32) Toronto (Heritage Group) Hong Kong (Homeland) Generation 1 (GEN 1) Generation 2 (GEN 2) Description Arrived in Canada as Grew up in Toronto, Lifelong Hong Kong residents adults, have lived in English-dominant bilinguals Toronto at least 20 years Dominant Cantonese English Cantonese language Age range 46-87 20-44 16-77 Total speakers n = 12 n = 12 n = 8 analyzed Hong Kong speakers included to strengthen/weaken contact-based explanations Thus, if inter-generational change is observed, is the same change observed in Hong Kong Cantonese? • If yes, contact explanation weakened • If no, contact explanation strengthened Data Processing • Prosodylab aligner (Gorman et al 2011) and Praat script used to obtain midpoint F1 and F2 of all usable tokens of 11 contrastive monophthongs (to create general vowel space) • Words with onset glides /j, w/ excluded • Manual review of output to ensure accurate formant measurements • Lobanov Normalization method (Thomas & Kendall 2007) • Total Tokens: 33,179 (For 11 vowel categories) Vowel Tokens Included in Analysis /a/ (low central) 6553 /ɔ/ (open ‘o’) 5268 /y/ (high front round) 1250 /u/ (high back round) 805 10 Overall Vowel space across 3 groups Lax Vowels Tense Vowels Pillai Scores for measuring merger • A “summary [statistic] of the degree to which two distributions are kept distinct” (Hay et al 2006) • An increasingly popular method used in sociolinguistic studies of mergers in progress (Nycz & Hall-Lew 2013) • Continuous scale from 0 (suggests most merged) to 1.0 (suggests least merged) • Separate scores calculated for each individual speaker • Makes it possible to say that speaker X is more merged than speaker Y. 12 Range of Pillai Scores for /y/ vs. /u/ 1.000 0.900 Pillai 0.800 Score of /y/ vs. /u/ 0.700 Pillai Score Range: 0.600 0.944 - 0.565 = N = 8 0.379 0.500 N = 12 N = 12 GEN GEN 13 GEN 2 speaker/y/ vs /u/ with(Lobanov the highestnormalized) Pillai Score GEN 2 speaker with the lowest Pillai Score /y/ /u/ /y/ /u/ BUN1 ZYU2 BUN1 DYUN2 SYUN3CYUN4 SYUT3 ZYU6 ZYU6 FUN1 ZYUN2 LYUN6CYUN4 CYUN4CYUN4ZYU6 FU1 SYU6ZYU6 CYUN4 ZYU1 SYU1CYUN4 GU2 FU2 LYUN6 GU2 SYU1 SYUN3 GU2 SYUN3 SYUN3SYUN3DYUN6 BUN2 ZYU6 GU2 ZYU3 SYUN3 CYUN4KYUT3SYU1CYUN4 GU2GUN1 BUN2 SYUN2ZYU6 SYUN3 HYUN1 GU2GU2BUN6 BUN3 FU6 FUT3GU2 GU1 GU2GU2 CYUN4 BUN2 SYUT3 CYUN4SYU1 FU1 GU3 SYUN2 BUN2 CYUN4 CYUN4 GU2 F1 ZYU6 GU2GU1 BUN2 SYUT3SYUN3 GU2 GU2 BUN1BUN1 TYUN4 GU2 CYUN4LYUN6 BUN2 BUN1 BUN1 BUN3FUN2 BUN2 GU2 CYUN4 GU2 GU2 GUN2 MUN6 BUN2 HYUN1 BUN2GU2 BUN2 BUN2 450 400 350 300 BUN1 BUN2 C2F21B 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 F2 YU = /y/ U = /u/ 14 Pillai Score Results for /a/ ~ /ɔ/ p* < 0.05 n.s. 0.850 /ɔ/ Pillai Score of /a/ vs. /ɔ/ 0.700 Pillai Score Range: 0.816 - 0.591 = 0.550 p** < 0.01 0.225 GEN GEN 0.379 for /y/ vs. /u/ Functional load: Minimal Pairs • Calculated based on Yue-Hashimoto’s (1972) syllabary • All possible contrastive CVC + tone sequences that occur in attested lexical items are counted • Possible since most morphemes are monosyllabic EXAMPLE Rime: /ɔ/ (open syllable) Rime: /a/ (open syllable) Onsets Onsets Tone b p m f Tone b p m f 55 + + + + [bɔ55], [pɔ55], [mɔ55], [fɔ55] 55 + + + + [ba55], [pa55], [ma55], [fa55] 4 MINIMAL PAIRS 35 + + + 35 + + + + 3 MINIMAL PAIRS 33 + + + 33 + + + + 3 MINIMAL PAIRS 21 + + 21 + + + 2 MINIMAL PAIRS 23 23 + 0 MINIMAL PAIRS 22 + 22 + + 1 MINIMAL PAIR PROCESS REPEATED FOR ALL CONTRASTIVE RIMES IN SYLLABARY Results: Number of Minimal Pairs /y/ ~ /u/ /a/ ~ /ɔ/ Contrastive CVC+Tone Combos 3 X 35 = 105 SAMPLE MINIMAL PAIRS /y/ ~ /u/ /a/ ~ /ɔ/ [kyn55] ‘to donate’ 捐 vs. [kun55] ‘official’ 官 [ka55] ‘family’ 家 vs. [kɔ55] ‘elder brother’ 哥 [kyn35] ‘roll’ 捲 vs. [kun35] ‘building’ 館 [ka35] ‘fake’ 假 vs. [kɔ35] ‘that’ 嗰 [kyn33] ‘to care for’ 眷 vs. [kun33] ‘container’ 罐 [ka33] (final particle) 㗎 vs. [kɔ33] (generic classifier) 個 And at least 102 more contrastive CVC+Tone pairs! LOWER FUNCTIONAL LOAD HIGHER FUNCTIONAL LOAD Lexical frequency in HLVC Data Analyzed Vowel Categories GEN 1 GEN 2 HK Total /a/ 2933 1788 1342 6553 HIGHEST LEXICAL FREQUENCY /ɔ/ 2240 1700 1229 5268 11,821 TOKENS TOTAL /ɐ/ 2134 1578 1274 5297 /i/ 1781 1315 585 4289 /ʊ/ 1237 884 633 2754 /ɛ/ 1045 795 504 2519 MORE THAN A 5-FOLD DIFFERENCE /ɪ/ 1010 626 495 2130 /œ/ 737 362 414 1662 /y/ 563 321 263 1250 2,055 TOKENS TOTAL /u/ 429 164 199 805 /ɵ/ 153 125 64 652 LOWEST LEXICAL FREQUENCY 14262 9658 7002 33179 Summary • Possible English influenced mergers addressed for two pairs of vowels in Toronto Heritage Cantonese • Evidence of merger found for only of these pairs • /y/ vs. /u/ • Functional load of both pairs of vowels calculated in terms of: • Number of minimal pairs • Lexical frequency • /a/ vs. /ɔ/ has much higher functional load based on these two measures • 35 times more minimal pairs than /y/ ~ /u/ • Occur more than 5 times more often /y/ or /u/ in HLVC Corpus data Discussion • Functional load (Wedel et al 2013) can be used to account for which phonemes are most susceptible to merger in a language contact setting • The higher functional load of /a/ ~ /ɔ/ may help Cantonese heritage speakers better learn the contrast than /y/ ~ /u/ distinction • This could explain why only /y/ ~ /u/ merger observed and only for a subset of speakers who have lower proficiency proxy scores (Tse 2019a) Conclusion • “Access to two distinct
Recommended publications
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/30/2021 10:48:31PM Via Free Access
    journal of language contact 11 (2018) 71-112 brill.com/jlc The Development of Phonological Stratification: Evidence from Stop Voicing Perception in Gurindji Kriol and Roper Kriol Jesse Stewart University of Saskatchewan [email protected] Felicity Meakins University of Queensland [email protected] Cassandra Algy Karungkarni Arts [email protected] Angelina Joshua Ngukurr Language Centre [email protected] Abstract This study tests the effect of multilingualism and language contact on consonant perception. Here, we explore the emergence of phonological stratification using two alternative forced-choice (2afc) identification task experiments to test listener perception of stop voicing with contrasting minimal pairs modified along a 10-step continuum. We examine a unique language ecology consisting of three languages spo- ken in Northern Territory, Australia: Roper Kriol (an English-lexifier creole language), Gurindji (Pama-Nyungan), and Gurindji Kriol (a mixed language derived from Gurindji and Kriol). In addition, this study focuses on three distinct age groups: children (group i, 8>), preteens to middle-aged adults (group ii, 10–58), and older adults (group iii, 65+). Results reveal that both Kriol and Gurindji Kriol listeners in group ii contrast the labial series [p] and [b]. Contrarily, while alveolar [t] and velar [k] were consis- tently identifiable by the majority of participants (74%), their voiced counterparts ([d] and [g]) showed random response patterns by 61% of the participants. Responses © Jesse Stewart et al., 2018 | doi 10.1163/19552629-01101003 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the prevailing cc-by-nc license at the time of publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Trubetzkoy Final
    Chapman, S. & Routledge, P. (eds) (2005) Key Thinkers in Linguistics and the Philosophy of Language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Pp 267-268. Trubetzkoy, N.S. (Nikolai Sergeevich); (b. 1890, d. 1938; Russian), lecturer at Moscow University (1915-1916), Rostov-on-Don University (1918), Sofia University (1920-1922), finally professor of Slavic linguistics at Vienna University (1922-1938). One of the founding fathers of phonology and a key theorist of the Prague School. (See Also: *Jakobson, Roman; *Martinet, André). Trubetzkoy’s life was blighted by persecution. Born in Moscow of aristocratic, academic parents, Trubetzkoy (whose names have been transliterated variously) was a prince, and, after study and an immediate start to a university career in Moscow, he was forced to flee by the 1917 revolution; he subsequently also had to leave Rostov and Sofia. On settling in Vienna, he became a geographically distant member of the Prague Linguistic Circle. It is at times difficult to tease his ideas apart from those of his friend *Jakobson, who ensured that his nearly-finished Grundzüge der Phonologie (1939) was posthumously published. Trubetzkoy had previously published substantial work in several fields, but this was his magnum opus. It summarised his previous phonological work and stands now as the classic statement of Prague School phonology, setting out an array of phonological ideas, several of which still characterise debate on phonological representations. Through it, the publications which preceded it, his work at conferences and general enthusiastic networking, Trubetzkoy was crucial in the development of phonology as a discipline distinct from phonetics, and the change in phonological focus from diachrony to synchrony.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Testing of the Functional Load Hypothesis and Implications for Phonological Theory Keywords: Functional Load, Merger, Language Change
    Statistical testing of the functional load hypothesis and implications for phonological theory keywords: functional load, merger, language change The idea that phonological neutralization is constrained by the communicative function of lexical contrast has a long history (e.g., Trubetzkoy 1939, Martinet 1955, Hockett 1967). A few case-studies have asked whether occurring neutralizations have a lower impact on lexical contrast than non-occurring ones, either by creating fewer homophones (e.g., Silverman 2010, Kaplan in press) or by incurring a relatively small drop in lexical-level entropy (Surendran and Niyogi 2006). Results have been mixed: some case-studies are consistent with the functional load account (Silverman 2010, Kaplan in press) while others contradict it (e.g., King 1967) or are judged inconclusive (e.g. Surendran & Niyogi 2006). However, if functional load is just one of many influences on sound change we would expect to find many individual ‘counter- examples’ to the functional load hypothesis. Consequently, we need a set of case-studies that can be assessed jointly using statistical methods. As part of an ongoing investigation of relationships between functional load and contrast neutralization, we are building a database of diachronically recent mergers in languages for which there exist frequency-coded phonemic word lists. The database currently includes data related to forty distinct mergers occurring in German, French, Korean, and several varieties of English. This data reveals a statistically significant difference between the distributions of these mergers versus comparable non-occurring mergers, in three measures of the functional load for phonemic oppositions: changes in homophony, lexical entropy and segmental entropy.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley Dissertations, Department of Linguistics
    UC Berkeley Dissertations, Department of Linguistics Title Relationship between Perceptual Accuracy and Information Measures: A cross-linguistic Study Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7tx5t8bt Author Kang, Shinae Publication Date 2015 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Relationship between perceptual accuracy and information measures: A cross-linguistic study by Shinae Kang A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Keith A. Johnson, Chair Professor Sharon Inkelas Professor Susan S. Lin Professor Robert T. Knight Fall 2015 Relationship between perceptual accuracy and information measures: A cross-linguistic study Copyright 2015 by Shinae Kang 1 Abstract Relationship between perceptual accuracy and information measures: A cross-linguistic study by Shinae Kang Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics University of California, Berkeley Professor Keith A. Johnson, Chair The current dissertation studies how the information conveyed by different speech el- ements of English, Japanese and Korean correlates with perceptual accuracy. Two well- established information measures are used: weighted negative contextual predictability (in- formativity) of a speech element; and the contribution of a speech element to syllable differ- entiation, or functional load. This dissertation finds that the correlation between information and perceptual accuracy differs depending on both the type of information measure and the language of the listener. To compute the information measures, Chapter 2 introduces a new corpus consisting of all the possible syllables for each of the three languages. The chapter shows that the two information measures are inversely correlated.
    [Show full text]
  • Sounds Difficult? Why Phonological Theory Needs 'Ease of Articulation'
    SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics Vol. 14 (2006): 207-226 Sounds difficult? Why phonological theory needs ‘ease of articulation’ David Shariatmadari [email protected] Introduction In this paper I will try to show that theories of phonological structure must incorporate some measure of phonetic naturalness, specifically the idea that there exists a tendency to conserve energy in the use of the articulatory organs, with ‘easy’ sounds being those that require less physical effort to produce on the part of the speaker. I will call this the Ease of Articulation Hypothesis (EoA) 1. A strong form of EoA would state that articulatory phonetics is the sole motivating factor for sound patterns including the structure of phonemic inventories, phonotactics and morphophonemic variation. This is clearly false. If it were the case, phonology would be indistinguishable from phonetics. There would be no reason for a given phonological process not to apply in all languages, since all human beings have the same vocal apparatus and what is phonetically natural for a speaker of Turkish must also be phonetically natural for a speaker of Japanese. And yet, there are clearly many phonological differences between these two, and among all other languages. In contrast, a weak version of EoA might hold that articulation is one of a number of pressures competing for influence over the shape of the speech string. Some of the time it will win out. Whether or not it does depends, crucially, on the structure of the language concerned. Since every language has a different structure, the way in which phonetic influence is felt will be different for every language.
    [Show full text]
  • A Note on the Prague School Jun Qian
    The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics NUMBER 87 JUNE 2007 71–86 A Note on the Prague School Jun Qian Abstract e 80th anniversary of the Prague Linguistic Circle offers an occasion to think about how to docu- ment the Prague School related events, how to keep whatever related to the Prague School, and how to make the Prague School resources easily accessible. In the following I will first chronologically list some Prague School related events in the past ten years (1996–2006). en I will refer to several personal com- munications as related to certain aspects of the Prague School theory. Finally I will propose when faced with this age of globalization and digitization what can be done so as to maximally utilize the Prague School resources. e following chronological list of Prague School related events are highly selective. Under the heading of the year are listed the events that occurred in that year. 1996 (1) From March 28 to 30, 1996, an international conference was held in Prague to celebrate the 70th anniversary of the Prague Linguistic Circle and to commemorate the centenary of the birth of Roman Jakobson. Some of the papers presented at this conference are included in Prague Linguistic Circle Papers Volume 3 (1999).1 (2) Professor Josef Vachek (1909–1996) passed away on March 31. He was probably the last of the pre-war Prague School members. e international linguistic community’s knowledge of the Prague School is largely due to his persistent effort (e.g. Vachek 1960, 1964a-b, 1966, 1968, 1983; Mathesius 1975).
    [Show full text]
  • Schiffman, Harold F. TITLE Language and Society in South Asia. Final Report
    DOCUMEKT RESUNE ED 127 806 PL 007 948 AUTHOR Shapiro, Michael C.; Schiffman, Harold F. TITLE Language and Society in South Asia. Final Report. INSTITUTION Institute of International Studies (DHEW/OE), Washington, D.C. BUREAU NO BR-110012HH PUB DATE Sep 75 CONTRACT OEC-0-74-2093 NOTE 380p. EDRS PRICE MF-$C.83 Hc-$20.75 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Asian Studies; *Bilingualism; Burmese; Cultural Context; *Dialects; Dialect Studies; Dravidian Languages; Language Classification; *Language Variation; Linguistic Borrowing; Multilingualism; Regional Dialects; Social Dialects; *Sociolinguistics; Tibetan IDENTIFIERS *Asia (South); *Code Switching; Indo Aryan Languages; Munda Languages; Tibeto Burman Languages ABSTRACT This work attempts to provide an overview of liuguistic diversity in South Asia and to place this diversity in a cultural context. The work tries to describe the current state of knowledge concerning socially conditioned language variation in the subcontinent. Each of five major language families contains numerous mutually intelligible and unintelligible dialects. Different dialects of a language may be required for 'written and spoken use and for different social groups. Bilingualism and multilingualism are common for communication between groups. Language choice is important for education, politics, radio and television. Chapter 2 of this book enumerates criteria used in the taxonomy of language forms, discussing a number of theories of dialect formation from the points of view of linguistic innovation and diffusion of linguistic change. Chapter 3 surveys literature on classification of South Asian languages. Chapter 4 considers South Asia as a distinct linguistic area and Chapter 5 evaluates literature on South Asian social dialects. Chapter 6 examines linguistic codes encompassing elements from more than one autonomous language.
    [Show full text]
  • A Functional-Load Account of Geminate Contrastiveness: a Meta-Study
    A Functional-Load Account of Geminate Contrastiveness: a Meta-Study Kevin Tang John Harris Department of Linguistics Division of Language Sciences University College London 4th September 2014 Linguistics Association of Great Britain 2014 Introduction Hypothesis The size of the duration difference between a singleton and its geminate counterpart reflects the amount of lexical work the contrast has to do Method Method: Examined three languages (and growing) in a meta-study. Phonetic data: Extracted duration measurements from phonetic studies Lexicon data: Data-mined electronic lexicons and quantified functional load Geminate:Non-Geminate Ratios Geminate-Singleton metric Duration: a universal attribute, whereas others (e.g. phonation) may be language–specific (Esposito and Di Benedetto, 1999) Geminate:Non-Geminate Ratio (G:NG) – a durational ratio, used extensively as a (default) metric of geminate-singleton contrasts But which durational attributes should be chosen? Calculation of G:NG ratios Main durational attributes (Ridouane, 2010) 1 Closure duration – all languages (Ladefoged and Maddieson, 1996, p.92) 2 Voice onset time (VOT) – Cypriot Greek, Moroccan Arabic,... 3 Preceding vowel duration – Bengali, Buginese, Italian,... Calculating G:NG ratios All studies use closure duration, some with VOT included Rarely include preceding vowel duration, although there is an a priori reason to do so: quantity/isochrony Indeterminacies G:NG is known to vary considerably, varying from 1.5:1 to 3:1 (Ladefoged and Maddieson, 1996, p.92) What contributes
    [Show full text]
  • The Acoustic Vowel Space of Central Minnesota English: Focus on Female Vowels Ettien Koffi St
    Linguistic Portfolios Volume 2 Article 2 2013 The Acoustic Vowel Space of Central Minnesota English: Focus on Female Vowels Ettien Koffi St. Cloud State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/stcloud_ling Part of the Applied Linguistics Commons Recommended Citation Koffi, Ettien (2013) "The Acoustic Vowel Space of Central Minnesota English: Focus on Female Vowels," Linguistic Portfolios: Vol. 2 , Article 2. Available at: https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/stcloud_ling/vol2/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by theRepository at St. Cloud State. It has been accepted for inclusion in Linguistic Portfolios by an authorized editor of theRepository at St. Cloud State. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Koffi: The Acoustic Vowel Space of Central Minnesota English: Focus on F Linguistic Portfolios – Volume 2 | 2 THE ACOUSTIC VOWEL SPACE OF CENTRAL MINNESTOTA ENGLISH: FOCUS ON FEMALE VOWELS1 ETTIEN KOFFI ABSTRACT This study is the first of its kind devoted to the acoustic vowel space of the dialect of American English spoken by female residents of Central Minnesota. It uses the methodology that Peterson and Barney (1952) used in their landmark study of General American English (GAE). Hillenbrand et al. (1995) used the same methodology to study Midwest vowels. The present study is based on 12 vowels produced by 22 female college students who grew up in one of the nine counties of Central Minnesota. The study highlights three important ways in which Central Minnesotan vowels differ from vowels produced by those in other parts of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Language Comparison of Functional Load for Vowels, Consonants, and Tones
    INTERSPEECH 2013 Cross-language Comparison of Functional Load for Vowels, Consonants, and Tones Yoon Mi Oh, François Pellegrino, Christophe Coupé, Egidio Marsico Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, Université de Lyon and CNRS, France {yoon-mi.oh; francois.pellegrino}@univ-lyon2.fr, {christophe.coupe; egidio.marsico}@ish-lyon.cnrs.fr Abstract Following Hockett [4], we consider that FL may be especially useful to shed light on the organization of The notion of functional load (FL) quantifies the role a phonological systems and on the relative weight associated to phonological contrast plays in keeping words distinct in a their components. In this paper, our aim is therefore to given language. Several studies have emphasized its potential evaluate the usefulness of a quantitative approach to FL as a impact on language evolution and acquisition, and FL has tool to describe and compare phonological systems. repeatedly been mentioned as a useful tool to supplement Five languages (Cantonese, English, Japanese, Korean and phonological descriptions for more than seventy years. It is Mandarin) were compared and analyzed through a quantitative nevertheless still rarely explored and this paper is a corpus-based approach. These languages were chosen in order contribution to filling this gap. to provide some variations in phonology (tonal vs. non-tonal By adopting an information-theory approach and a languages) to answer two research questions: measure of FL proposed by Hockett (1955), we performed a - Are the FL carried by segmental components (vowels and corpus-based comparison of three non-tonal (English, consonants) comparable among languages? Japanese, Korean) and two tonal languages (Cantonese and - What is the FL associated with tonal systems? Mandarin).
    [Show full text]
  • The Functional Load of Tone in Mandarin Is As High As That of Vowels
    The Functional Load of Tone in Mandarin is as High as that of Vowels Dinoj Surendran & Gina-Anne Levow Computer Science Department, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA dinoj; levow ¡ @cs.uchicago.edu Abstract the tones are of low functional yield.” This imprecision is not Tonal languages, such as Mandarin, convey information limited to suprasegmentals, as witnessed by statements such as using both phonemes and tones. Using a recently proposed “The functional load of voicing in Japanese may be lower than framework for measuring the functional load of a phonological normally thought” [11]. The framework of [12], as exemplified contrast (i.e. how much use a language makes of the contrast), in this paper, permits such statements to be quantified with the we carry out several computations to estimate how much use appropriate corpora, and more detailed questions to be asked. Mandarin makes of tones. The most interesting result is that We consider the functional load carried by the presence of identifying the tone of a syllable is at least as important as contrastive lexical tones in general and the information loss that identifying the vowels in the syllable. Another computation would be incurred by neutralization of the tonal contrast, in Sec- suggests that the contrast between low and neutral tone carries tion 4, and compare it to a clearly essential set of contrasts be- relatively little information. tween the vowels of Mandarin and the functional load of stress in several other languages. We find support for the phonologi- cal importance of Mandarin lexical tone contrasts. We further evaluate the relative importance of the pairwise contrasts be- 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Frequency-Influenced Choice of L2 Sound Realization and Perception: Evidence from Two Chinese Dialects
    PACLIC 28 Frequency-influenced choice of L2 sound realization and perception: evidence from two Chinese dialects Yizhou Lan Department of Asian and International Studies City University of Hong Kong [email protected] category was understudied. This study addresses a Abstract case when speakers from two L1s with similar segmental layout may have different realizations of The study of second language speech perception usually put L1-L2 phonological L2 categories. Although theoretic models in speech mapping as the rule of thumB in predicting learning such were very rich in literature, such as learning outcome, and seldom included more Perceptual Assimilation Model (PAM [1]) and its fine-grained aspects such as frequency. This another version for L2 learners (PAM-L2 [2]) as study examines how frequency of sounds in L1 well as Speech Learning model (SLM, [3]) had may influence L2 segmental production and addressed different L1 assimilation patterns in perception, with examples from English learning multiple L2s, few studies had found learners native to two Chinese dialects, similar multiple L1s yielding different L2 learning Cantonese and Sichuanese. Although these two outcomes. dialects (L1s) have very similar phonological PAM and SLM suggest that second language inventory, they produce certain L2 sounds in drastic difference. Productions of English learners will either assimilate the L2 sound voiceless interdental fricative and central liquid categories (or sequence of sounds) to L1 sound in the onset position were oBtained in free categories according to different perceptual speech from the two dialects’ speakers in vast distances. Increased exposure to L2 will thus phonological environments. Then, perception trigger distriButive learning of L2 input by forming tests, including AX and oddity tasks, were done a new intermediate category between the L1 and for these two groups of speakers as well.
    [Show full text]