DOCSLIB.ORG

The History of the Western Wall Before the Six-Day War

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The History of the Western Wall Before the Six-Day War Chapter 1 The History of the Western Wall before the Six-Day War Before addressing the post-Six-Day War period, it is imperative that we gain a deeper understanding of the Western Wall’s history from its early days until 1967. The post-war years (1967–2000) may feel as if they are entirely discon- nected from the site’s earlier history. The disturbance in continued Jewish presence at the site during the nineteen years of Jerusalem’s division (between the War of Independence in 1948 and the Six-Day War in 1967), and the devel- opment at the Wall which commenced immediately afterwards, meant that a “new” Western Wall was born after June 1967, restoring the sense of connection between the site’s early and late history. Yet, in fact, the centuries during which this specific portion of the Western Wall developed as the most prominent prayer site for Jews the world over are crucial. It was these years that shaped, to a large extent, the approach towards the Wall in the years following the Six-Day War. The site’s historical memory, its holiness, the religious ceremonies and events that took place there before 1948 – including its transformation into both a religious-Jewish and a Zionist symbol – shaped the attitude towards the Wall in the days, months, and years that followed the 1967 war. In the first section of this chapter, we discuss the process of the Wall’s con- secration during the early period of Jerusalem’s history. The turning point in this process was the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE, which led to the Jews’ departure from Jerusalem; the city then evolved into a distant site of longing for Jewish pilgrims. The establishment of a Jewish community in Jerusalem in later generations, and the increase in the number of visitors to the city, led to the sanctification of the retaining wall and its transformation into Judaism’s most important holy site. The chapter’s central section addresses the changes that occurred in the status of the Western Wall in the modern era, first under Ottoman rule and later under the British Mandate, imposed after 1917. In these years the number of visitors to the site – both worshippers and tourists – increased, and the Western Wall became a focus of national conflict between the local Jewish and Arab communities. The chapter’s final section addresses the period between 1948 and 1967, when free access to the site was denied Israeli Jews. During this period, a sense of yearning and the site’s sanc- tity, which had now taken on mythic proportions, filled the hearts of many. © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2020 | doi:10.11639789004431331_003 The History of the Western Wall before the Six-Day War 17 1 The Development of the Western Wall as a Holy Place According to Jewish tradition, the First Temple was built by King Solomon. His father, King David, brought the Ark of the Covenant to Jerusalem, installing it on the threshing floor (goren in Hebrew) of Arauna the Jebusite – traditionally believed to be the site of the Binding of Isaac. While it appears that at first the Temple served primarily the Davidic dynasty, it gradually became a pilgrimage destination for the Jews of the Land of Israel. In the eighth and seventh centu- ries BCE, following the destruction of other places of worship in the region, the status of Jerusalem as a destination for pilgrims was even more clearly estab- lished. The Temple became the central and almost exclusive focus of worship for the land’s Jews.1 The First Temple was destroyed by the Babylonians in 586 BCE. Two or three generations later, following the return of some Jews from the Babylonian Exile, the Temple was rebuilt. At its inauguration in 516 BCE it was admittedly somewhat modest, but in later generations it gradually developed and expand- ed in size. In the late Second Temple period, under the rule of King Herod the Great, the area underwent a major transformation. The Temple, built by the returnees to Zion and expanded significantly during the Hasmonean era (in the second and first centuries BCE), was too small to accommodate the growing needs of the Jews of the Land of Israel and the Diaspora. To allow the further expansion of the plaza surrounding the temple, King Herod built massive walls dozens of meters in height; this created a wide, elevated esplanade at the center of which stood the renovated temple. One of the walls built during this period, and the most impressive among them, was the Western Wall – the retaining wall of the external western wall surrounding the temple.2 Although a number of gates opened in other walls also led pilgrims to the holy esplanade and the temple itself, the western side contained four such gates, emphasizing the im- portance of the Western Wall relative to the temple’s other borders. In the last stages of the Great Revolt (the First Jewish-Roman War, 66–70 CE), following a siege that lasted several months, the Romans succeeded in break- ing through the walls of Jerusalem; in the Jewish month of Av (August), 70 CE, 1 Avigdor Horovitz, “The Temple of Solomon,” in The History of Jerusalem: The Biblical Period, eds. Amihai Mazar and Shmuel Ahituv (Jerusalem: Yad Izhak Ben-Zvi, 2000, Hebrew), 131–155; Ze’ev Herzog, “The Temple of Solomon: its Plan and Archaeological Background,” in The History of Jerusalem: The Biblical Period, eds. Shmuel Ahituvand and Amihai Mazar (Jerusalem: Yad Izhak Ben-Zvi, 2000, Hebrew), 155–174. 2 Ronny Reich and Yuval Baruch, “On Expansion of the Temple Mount in the Late Second Temple Period,” Cathedra 164 (2017): 7–24 (Hebrew)..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Israel and Judah: 18. Temple Interior and Dedication
    Associates for Scriptural Knowledge • P.O. Box 25000, Portland, OR 97298-0990 USA © ASK, March 2019 • All rights reserved • Number 3/19 Telephone: 503 292 4352 • Internet: www.askelm.com • E-Mail: [email protected] How the Siege of Titus Locates the Temple Mount in the City of David by Marilyn Sams, July 2016 Formatted and annotated by David Sielaff, March 2019 This detailed research paper by independent author Marilyn Sams is one of several to follow her 2015 book, The Jerusalem Temple Mount Myth. Her book was inspired by a desire to prove (or disprove) Dr. Ernest Martin’s research in The Temples That Jerusalem Forgot. Ms. Sams wrote a second book in 2017, The Jerusalem Temple Mount: A Compendium of Ancient Descriptions expanding the argument in her first book, itemizing and analyzing 375 ancient descriptions of the Temple, Fort Antonia, and environs, all confirming a Gihon location for God’s Temples.1 Her books and articles greatly advance Dr. Martin’s arguments. David Sielaff, ASK Editor Marilyn Sams: The siege of Titus has been the subject of many books and papers, but always from the false perspective of the Jerusalem Temple Mount’s misidentification.2 The purpose of this paper is to illuminate additional aspects of the siege, in order to show how they cannot reasonably be applied to the current models of the temple and Fort Antonia, but can when the “Temple Mount” is identified as Fort Antonia. Conflicts Between the Rebellious Leaders Prior to the Siege of Titus A clarification of the definition of “Acra” is crucial to understanding the conflicts between John of Gischala and Simon of Giora, two of the rebellious [Jewish] faction leaders, who divided parts of Jerusalem 1 Her second book shows the impossibility of the so-called “Temple Mount” and demonstrate the necessity of a Gihon site of the Temples.
    [Show full text]
  • The Walls of Jerusalem
    Palestine Exploration Quarterly ISSN: 0031-0328 (Print) 1743-1301 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ypeq20 The Walls of Jerusalem C. W. Wilson To cite this article: C. W. Wilson (1905) The Walls of Jerusalem, Palestine Exploration Quarterly, 37:3, 231-243, DOI: 10.1179/peq.1905.37.3.231 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/peq.1905.37.3.231 Published online: 20 Nov 2013. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 13 View related articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ypeq20 Download by: [UNSW Library] Date: 23 April 2016, At: 06:55 231 THE 'VALLS OF JERUSALEM. By Major-Gen. Sir C. W. WILSON, K.C.B., l).C.L., F.R.S. 1. General Remarks; 2. The City Walls in A.D. 70. 1. Gene"'alRernarks.-Before attempting to investigate the questions connected with the ancient walls of Jerusalem, some consideration of the general principles that governed the construction of fortifica- tions in early times is not only desirable, but necessary. Jerusalem was strongly fortified at all periods of its· history, but there is .no reason to suppose that there was anything unusual in the trace and construction of its walls. The defences of Jebus could not have differed greatly from those of other Canaanite cities; the walls of David and his successors, which Nehemiah restored, ,vere constructed probably in accordance with Phrenician systems of fortification; and the citadels and ,valls built ·by Herod the Great and Herod Agrippa were almost certainly Greek or Greco-Roman in character.
    [Show full text]
  • The Upper Kidron Valley
    Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies Founded by the Charles H. Revson Foundation The Upper Kidron Valley Conservation and Development in the Visual Basin of the Old City of Jerusalem Editor: Israel Kimhi Jerusalem 2010 Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies – Study No. 398 The Upper Kidron Valley Conservation and Development in the Visual Basin of the Old City of Jerusalem Editor: Israel Kimhi This publication was made possible thanks to the assistance of the Richard and Rhoda Goldman Fund, San Francisco. 7KHFRQWHQWRIWKLVGRFXPHQWUHÀHFWVWKHDXWKRUV¶RSLQLRQRQO\ Photographs: Maya Choshen, Israel Kimhi, and Flash 90 Linguistic editing (Hebrew): Shlomo Arad Production and printing: Hamutal Appel Pagination and design: Esti Boehm Translation: Sagir International Translations Ltd. © 2010, The Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies Hay Elyachar House 20 Radak St., Jerusalem 92186 http://www.jiis.org E-mail: [email protected] Research Team Israel Kimhi – head of the team and editor of the report Eran Avni – infrastructures, public participation, tourism sites Amir Eidelman – geology Yair Assaf-Shapira – research, mapping, and geographical information systems Malka Greenberg-Raanan – physical planning, development of construction Maya Choshen – population and society Mike Turner – physical planning, development of construction, visual analysis, future development trends Muhamad Nakhal ±UHVLGHQWSDUWLFLSDWLRQKLVWRU\SUR¿OHRIWKH$UDEQHLJKERU- hoods Michal Korach – population and society Israel Kimhi – recommendations for future development, land uses, transport, planning Amnon Ramon – history, religions, sites for conservation Acknowledgments The research team thanks the residents of the Upper Kidron Valley and the Visual Basin of the Old City, and their representatives, for cooperating with the researchers during the course of the study and for their willingness to meet frequently with the team.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Jerusalem
    THE HISTORY OF JERUSALEM 1 Prepared by Ilana Epstein and Simon Goulden, US Living & Learning, May 2015/אייר תשע"ה Biblical quotations are from www.mechon-mamre.org 2 In its long history Jerusalem has been: . Destroyed at least twice . Besieged 23 times . Attacked 52 times . Captured and recaptured 44 times 3 Chalcolithic Period • The first settlement was established near the Gichon Spring 4 Middle Bronze Age The Book of Bereshit 14:18, mentions a city called Salem, which mefarashim (commentators) such as the Ramban (d. 1270) identifies as Jerusalem, ruled by King Melchizedek, probably a title, which means "my king is zedek", where Zedek is believed to refer to the word righteous, or perhaps “The Righteous King”. According to one Midrash, Jerusalem was founded by Abraham's forefathers Shem and Eber. And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread 18 יח ּומַ לְכִּ י- קצֶדֶ מֶ לְֶך שָׁ לֵם, הוֹצִּ יא םלֶחֶ וָׁיָׁיִּן; וְ הּוא כֹהֵ ן, לְאֵ ל עֶלְיוֹן. and wine; and he was priest of God the Most High. 5 Middle Bronze Age 2220 -1550 BCE • c.1700 BCE - the Binding of Isaac takes place on Mount Moriah. Mefarashim have often interpreted the location of the mountain to be Jerusalem And they came to the place which God had told him 9 ט וַיָׁבֹאּו, אֶ ל- ַהָׁמֹקוםֲ אֶשרַ ָאמר-לוֹ ָׁהֱאִֹּלהים, וַיִּבֶ ן ָׁשם ַאְבָׁרָׁהם of; and Abraham built the altar there, and laid the אֶ ת- ַהִּמְזֵבַח , וַיַעֲרְֹך אֶ ת- ָׁהֵעִּצים; וַיַעֲקֹד, אֶ ת- ִּיְצָׁחק ְבֹנו , ַוָׁיֶשםֹאֹתו wood in order, and bound Isaac his son, and laid him on עַל- ַהִּמְזֵבַח , ִּמַמַעל ָׁלֵעִּצים.
    [Show full text]
  • Resources for the Study of Islamic Architecture Historical Section
    RESOURCES FOR THE STUDY OF ISLAMIC ARCHITECTURE HISTORICAL SECTION Prepared by: Sabri Jarrar András Riedlmayer Jeffrey B. Spurr © 1994 AGA KHAN PROGRAM FOR ISLAMIC ARCHITECTURE RESOURCES FOR THE STUDY OF ISLAMIC ARCHITECTURE HISTORICAL SECTION BIBLIOGRAPHIC COMPONENT Historical Section, Bibliographic Component Reference Books BASIC REFERENCE TOOLS FOR THE HISTORY OF ISLAMIC ART AND ARCHITECTURE This list covers bibliographies, periodical indexes and other basic research tools; also included is a selection of monographs and surveys of architecture, with an emphasis on recent and well-illustrated works published after 1980. For an annotated guide to the most important such works published prior to that date, see Terry Allen, Islamic Architecture: An Introductory Bibliography. Cambridge, Mass., 1979 (available in photocopy from the Aga Khan Program at Harvard). For more comprehensive listings, see Creswell's Bibliography and its supplements, as well as the following subject bibliographies. GENERAL BIBLIOGRAPHIES AND PERIODICAL INDEXES Creswell, K. A. C. A Bibliography of the Architecture, Arts, and Crafts of Islam to 1st Jan. 1960 Cairo, 1961; reprt. 1978. /the largest and most comprehensive compilation of books and articles on all aspects of Islamic art and architecture (except numismatics- for titles on Islamic coins and medals see: L.A. Mayer, Bibliography of Moslem Numismatics and the periodical Numismatic Literature). Intelligently organized; incl. detailed annotations, e.g. listing buildings and objects illustrated in each of the works cited. Supplements: [1st]: 1961-1972 (Cairo, 1973); [2nd]: 1972-1980, with omissions from previous years (Cairo, 1984)./ Islamic Architecture: An Introductory Bibliography, ed. Terry Allen. Cambridge, Mass., 1979. /a selective and intelligently organized general overview of the literature to that date, with detailed and often critical annotations./ Index Islamicus 1665-1905, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • From Destruction to Preservation
    3 From Destruction to Preservation When Theodor Herzl, the founder of political Zionism, visited Jerusalem in 1898, he was repelled by “the musty deposits of two thousand years of inhumanity, intol- erance and foulness” in the “reeking alleys” of the Old City. He vowed that the first thing the Zionists would do when they got control of Jerusalem would be to tear most of it down, building an “airy, comfortable, properly sewered, new city around the holy places.”1 Similarly, when East Jerusalem and the Old City were captured by Israel in 1967, David Ben-Gurion (the founder of the State of Israel and the first prime minister of the country), then a member of Knesset, called for the demoli- tion of the walls of Jerusalem because they were not Jewish and thus threatened to disrupt the visual continuity of Israeli control.2 Though neither Herzl’s nor Ben Gurion’s vision or goal was realized, massive and deliberate destructions of material legacies occurred following the UN Parti- tion Plan of 1947. During the period of Jordanian rule of the Old City and East Jerusalem between 1948 and 1967, numerous synagogues and other Jewish institu- tions, particularly in the Jewish Quarter, were abandoned, neglected, or demol- ished.3 Then, in June 1967, immediately following the armistice that concluded the Arab-Israeli War, all inhabitants of the Mughrabi Quarter near the Western Wall were evacuated, and the historic district was razed to create room for a wide, open plaza that would be joined to the Jewish Quarter.4 Additional destruction occurred throughout the Jewish Quarter.
    [Show full text]
  • 85 the FORTIFICATIONS of JERUSALEM in the BYZANTINE PERIOD the Roman Colony of Aelia Capitolina Was Founded in the 2Nd Century A
    ARAM, 18-19 (2006-2007) 85-112.S. WEKSLER-BDOLAH doi: 10.2143/ARAM.18.0.2020723 85 THE FORTIFICATIONS OF JERUSALEM IN THE BYZANTINE PERIOD SHLOMIT WEKSLER-BDOLAH1 (Israel Antiquities Authority) The Roman colony of Aelia Capitolina was founded in the 2nd century AD over the remains of the Second Temple period Jewish city of Jerusalem.2 The Roman city mostly ignored the remains of the Jewish city and made no use of the ruined fortifications, known as the First Wall, the Second Wall and the Third Wall of the Second Temple Period (Jewish War, V.136, 142-149). The only exception was a segment of the western wall, where the tenth Roman Le- gion was stationed (Jewish War, VII. 1-4). It is widely accepted that like many other Roman cities during the Pax Romana (Ward-Perkins 1984:191, Gregory 1982:44, Mazor 2004:23-109), the new-founded colony of Aelia Capitolina was unwalled and her limits were marked by monumental, free-standing city gates (Avi-Yonah 1976; Geva 1993a; Tsafrir 1999a:136; Bahat 1990; Mazor 2004:109-119). Previous fortifications that existed in many of these cities were deliberately ruined or allowed to fall into disrepair during the Pax Romana, enabling the cities’ limits to expand beyond their older walls. Such is the case, for example in Caesarea Maritima, Scythopolis, Tiberias, or Gadara.3 Disorders in the Empire during the third century resulted in an extensive forti- fied construction that walled many cities (Johnson 1983; Lander 1984). Al- though the construction of walls characterized the endangered western half of the Roman Empire, fortifications were occasionally built in the eastern part of the Empire as well, especially around cities located near the limes, such as 1 This paper is part of my Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Fredericksburg Address
    Pastor Jeremy M. Thomas Fredericksburg Bible Church 107 East Austin Fredericksburg, Texas 78624 830-997-8834 [email protected] C1331 – September 18, 2013 – Nehemiah 3:1-32 Nehemiah's Rebuilding Effort We’re going to move forward to Nehemiah 3 tonight but to get up to speed last week we saw Nehemiah’s meteoric rise to leadership. He started off as cupbearer to Artaxerxes, the mighty king of Persia but even though he was surrounded by the luxury of palace life he had God’s concerns chiefly in mind; the Jewish people and the Jewish city of Jerusalem. Upon receiving the report that the Jewish people were in reproach and the Jewish city of Jerusalem was in desolation he began to weep and fast and pray for a period of four months. His persistent prayer was a mark of a leader in the making. Nehemiah wanted to rebuild Jerusalem but to do so he would have to go into the king and request a change in his policy toward Jerusalem. The king’s policy at the time was that Jerusalem should not be fortified. To ask him to reverse this policy was therefore an extremely dangerous effort as it would challenge the king’s decision-making abilities. However, after four months of prayer and sadness he could no longer suppress his sadness and when he went in before the king (and the queen) the sadness was detected prompting the king to ask for the reason. Nehemiah revealed it was the condition of Jerusalem, the city of his father’s and then began to tremble.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerusalem in the Ottoman Rule (1516-1917 AD)
    International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE) Volume 6, Issue 1, January 2019, PP 43-51 ISSN 2349-0373 (Print) & ISSN 2349-0381 (Online) http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2349-0381.0601005 www.arcjournals.org Jerusalem in the Ottoman Rule (1516-1917 AD) Dr Zakaria Ibrahim Al-Sinwar* Professor of Modern and Contemporary History, the Islamic University of Gaza *Corresponding Author: Dr Zakaria Ibrahim Al-Sinwar, Professor of Modern and Contemporary History, the Islamic University of Gaza Abstract: Jerusalem enjoyed a special status during the period of Islamic rule, because of its religious status in Islam, it was ruled by the Ottomans 400 years (1516-1917), It passed through three stages, the foreign ambitions of Europe and Zionism emerged. This study deals with the situation of Jerusalem under the Ottoman rule in its first era and then its conditions under Egyptian rule and then in the late Ottoman period until 1917 as you study European ambitions in the city and excavations and excavations in Jerusalem, Jerusalem in the late Ottoman era and the goals of those excavations and then dealt with the Zionist settlement in Jerusalem and how it was beginning individual efforts by taking a dimension of "charity" in favour of the poor Jews and then became a settlement directed by the Zionist movement and the extent of settlement. Keywords: Jerusalem, Ottoman Rule, Egyptian Rule in Palestine, European Ambitions, Zionist Settlement 1. INTRODUCTION The city of Jerusalem has a special religious status. It is the first Muslim qibla to Muslims in their prayers before the Kaaba in Makkah, and to Prophet’s isra to and mi’raj at night from Mecca and after his arrival prayed at Al Aqsa Mosque.
    [Show full text]
  • An Undergraduate Ejournal 2016. Vol 03
    JerusalemJerusalem Art Art HistoryHistory Journal: Journal: AnAn Undergraduate Undergraduate eJournaleJournal __ HistoireHistoire de de l’art l’art àà Jérusalem Jérusalem : : cyberrevuecyberrevue étudiante étudiante dede premier premier cycle cycle __ 2016. vol 03 2016. vol 03 Jerusalem Art History Journal: An Undergraduate eJournal / Histoire de l’art à Jérusalem : cyberrevue étudiante de premier cycle Editor-in-chief / Redactrice en chef Loren Lerner Guest editors / Directrices de la rédaction Tara Ng and / et Kimberly Glassman Concordia University / Université Concordia 1455, boul. de Maisonneuve West, EV- 3.760 Montréal, Québec, Canada H3G 1M8 (514) 848-2424, ext. 4698 Free e-publication, available via the Department of Art History, Concordia University E-publication en libre accès via Département d’histoire de l’art jerusalemjournal.concordia.ca Design Pata Macedo Copy-editing / Révision des Textes Tara Ng and / et Kimberly Glassman Translation / Traduction Translation Services, Concordia University / Services de traduction, Université Concordia Table of Contents _ Table des matières _ vi Introducing the Guest Editors Présentation des collaboratrices invitées Loren Lerner xi Editorial Éditorial Tara Ng and / et Kimberly Glassman . i . – A Journey to Jerusalem Un voyage à Jérusalem 2 Heavenly Jerusalem as the City of God: Representations through Illuminated Manuscripts of Saint Augustine’s Theology of the Two Cities Georges-Étienne Carrière 23 Muhammad’s Night Journey: Comic Visual Exploration through a Western Perspective Gabby Orellana 42 Armenian Illuminations: Strange Connections between Nations Alyag Malkhassian 57 How to Loot a Work of Art Jasmine Kanter 75 Jerusalem: A Multi-Layered City through the Work of Jay Ginsherman Louis Angot 92 Chronicles of a Naive Backpacker in Jerusalem Florence Seymour-Provencher .
    [Show full text]
  • Sacred Space and the Limits of Law on the Temple Mount (1917-1948)
    Syracuse University SURFACE Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public History - Theses Affairs 8-2012 Managing the Divine Jurisdiction: Sacred Space and the Limits of Law on the Temple Mount (1917-1948) Robert W. Nicholson Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/hst_thesis Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Nicholson, Robert W., "Managing the Divine Jurisdiction: Sacred Space and the Limits of Law on the Temple Mount (1917-1948)" (2012). History - Theses. 1. https://surface.syr.edu/hst_thesis/1 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in History - Theses by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT This paper probes the history of the Temple Mount complex during the British Mandate for Palestine. Approaching this sacred space from three different perspectives—British, Arab, and Jewish—this paper examines how people and events surrounding it contributed to the evolution of Palestine after World War I. Ultimately, I argue that Britain’s non-policy on the Temple Mount undermined the Mandate project and ultimately contributed to the rise of the Israeli- Palestinian conflict. Fearful of angering Muslims in Palestine and around the world, the British handed control of the space to an indigenous Arab-Muslim administration. This policy of “affirmative deference” allowed certain Muslim leaders to carve out a sphere of de facto sovereignty inside the site and establish a base for resistance to the British government. For many Jewish settlers in Palestine, sanctioned and unchecked Arab power inside Judaism’s holiest site led them to abandon faith in the Mandate and formulate their own plans for independence.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Timeline for the Nation of Israel and the Jewish People
    HISTORICAL TIMELINE FOR THE NATION OF ISRAEL AND THE JEWISH PEOPLE NB. Events relating specifically to Britain are in italics. c.2000 BC God makes an everlasting Covenant with Abraham, which continues through Isaac, Jacob and their descendants. They will become a great nation, those who bless him and his descendants will be blessed, those who curse him and his descendants will be cursed. All the nations of the earth will be blessed through them. The Land of Canaan will be their everlasting inheritance. (Genesis 12:3, 13:14-17, 15:18-21, 17:7-8, Psalm 105:8-11) c.1400 BC The Israelites enter the Promised Land. Prior to that they have been delivered from the hands of the Egyptians and then spent 40 years wandering the desert because of unbelief. Through the Mosaic Covenant they have been given Torah and separated to God as a ‘holy’ nation. (Exodus 19:5-6) The 12 tribes of Israel are allotted their portion of territory. c.1000 BC King David conquers Jerusalem and makes it the capital of the Kingdom of Israel. God covenants with David that his dynasty would be an everlasting one. (1 Chronicles 17:3-15) His son, Solomon, is commissioned by the Lord to build the House of the Lord. The Lord declares that His eyes and His heart would dwell there perpetually. (2 Chronicles 7:16) c.920 BC Israel is divided into two kingdoms. The 10 northern tribes rebel against the Lord and set up an alternative religious system. The tribes of Judah and Benjamin remain faithful to the Lord for a while.
    [Show full text]