Draft Outline of Initial Key Messages for Farnborough Airspace Change

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Draft Outline of Initial Key Messages for Farnborough Airspace Change Airspace Consultation Part B: Proposed changes below 4,000ft in the vicinity of Farnborough Airport (Affecting Parts of Hampshire, Surrey, West Sussex and Berkshire) © TAG Farnborough Part B: Farnborough aircraft except Ordnance Survey data © below 4,000ft Crown copyright and database right 2013 Part C: Farnborough aircraft 4,000ft-7,000ft Part D: Southampton and Bournemouth arriving aircraft from the east 4,000ft-7,000ft Part D: Bournemouth arriving aircraft from the east 2,500ft-4,000ft Part B Part C Part C Part C Part D Part D N W E S Use PDF zoom tools Airfield to study this map Farnborough more closely Airport Figure B1 Consultation Areas Overview Airspace Consultation Contents Contents 1. Introduction to Part B .......................................................................................... 5 2. Today’s airspace usage ........................................................................................ 9 3. Objectives and justification for proposed changes below 4,000ft .............................. 16 4. Local considerations for route positioning .............................................................. 21 5. Northern dashed blue area – GA impact in the vicinity ............................................ 45 6. Western blue dashed area - RAF Odiham – Changes to departure routes ................... 47 7. Changes above 4,000ft ....................................................................................... 52 List of Figures Figure B1: Consultation areas overview ........................................................................ 5 Figure B2: Consultation areas in the vicinity of Farnborough ........................................... 7 Figure B3: All commercial flights (up to 20,000ft) density plot with National Parks and AONBs .................................................................................................................... 35 Figure B4: Farnborough departures and arrivals (up to 20,000ft) density plot .................. 36 Figure B5: Arrows/dotted lines show Runway 06 departure flows (Radar data shows all Farnborough air traffic below 4,000ft) ......................................................................... 37 Figure B6: Arrows/dotted lines show Runway 24 departure flows (Radar data shows all Farnborough air traffic below 4,000ft) ......................................................................... 38 Figure B7: Arrows/dotted lines show Runway 06 arrival flows (Radar data shows all Farnborough air traffic below 4,000ft) ......................................................................... 39 Figure B8: Arrows/dotted lines show Runway 24 arrival flows (Radar data shows all Farnborough air traffic below 4,000ft) ......................................................................... 40 Figure B9: Proposed Farnborough departures from both runways below 4,000ft ............... 41 Figure B10: Farnborough arrivals to Runway 06 below 4,000ft ....................................... 42 Figure B11: Farnborough arrivals to Runway 24 below 4,000ft ....................................... 43 Figure B12: Fairoaks and other light aircraft – Increased access ..................................... 45 Figure B13: Proposed change to RAF Odiham departure routes (Western blue area) ......... 50 Page B2 Part B: Proposed Changes below 4,000ft in the vicinity of Farnborough Airport Contents Airspace Consultation List of Tables Table B1: Runway 06 Departures to the north .............................................................. 30 Table B2: Runway 06 Departures to the south ............................................................. 30 Table B3: Runway 06 Departures to the southwest ....................................................... 30 Table B4: Runway 24 Departures to the north .............................................................. 31 Table B5: Runway 24 Departures to the south ............................................................. 31 Table B6: Runway 24 Departures to the southwest ....................................................... 31 Table B7: Runway 06 Arrivals from the north ............................................................... 32 Table B8: Runway 06 Arrivals from the south ............................................................... 32 Table B9: Runway 06 Arrivals from the southwest ........................................................ 32 Table B10: Runway 24 Arrivals from the north ............................................................. 33 Table B11: Runway 24 Arrivals from the south ............................................................. 33 Table B12: Runway 24 Arrivals from the southwest ...................................................... 33 Table B13: Departures - Typical loudest noise level (Lmax dBA) at various heights for the most common aircraft types, and the noisiest aircraft types, using Farnborough .............. 34 Table B14: Arrivals - Typical loudest noise level (Lmax dBA) at various heights for the most common aircraft types, and the noisiest aircraft types, using Farnborough ...................... 34 Table B15: Table of noise levels (Lmax dBA) for equivalent sounds ................................. 34 Table B16 relating to Figure B13: Chinook noise information, extract from a USAPHC report49 Part B: Proposed Changes below 4,000ft in the vicinity of Farnborough Airport Page B3 Airspace Consultation Contents This page intentionally left blank Page B4 Part B: Proposed Changes below 4,000ft in the vicinity of Farnborough Airport Introduction to Part B Airspace Consultation 1. Introduction to Part B 1.1. This part of the consultation material describes the airspace changes proposed from the surface to less than 4,000ft above mean sea level1. The region which may be affected is shown enclosed by the solid blue line in Figure B1 below. The dashed blue outlined areas are specific sub-areas of the main Part B region. Part B: Farnborough aircraft below 4,000ft Part C: Farnborough aircraft 4,000ft-7,000ft Part D: Southampton and Bournemouth arriving aircraft from the east 4,000ft-7,000ft Part D: Bournemouth arriving aircraft from the east 2,500ft-4,000ft Part B Part C Part C Part C Part D Part D © TAG Farnborough except Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2013 Figure B1 Consultation Areas Overview Figure B1: Consultation areas overview 1.2. Part B assumes that: a. You have read and understood the first half of Part A (this sets the context for the proposed changes) b. You have identified that the geographic areas (shown outlined in blue in Figure B1) above are of interest to you, and c. You understand that this consultation only covers the areas identified in Figure B1 where changes to air traffic flows are likely to occur as a result of this proposal. N W E S Use PDF zoom tools Airfield 1 Altitudes of flights and airspace are given in feet above mean sea level (AMSL). Farnborough Airport is at 238ft AMSL. The terrain around Farnborough within the area shown in Figure B1 varies between about 100ft to about 900ft in elevation. To calculate the height above groundto study level this (AGL)map whereFarnborough you Airport are, subtract your elevation from the altitudes in this document. more closely For example, if you live on a 200ft hill (AMSL), and aircraft fly over you at an altitude of 3,400ft, that aircraft is 3,400 – 200 = 3,200ft AGL (above you). Part B: Proposed Changes below 4,000ft in the vicinity of Farnborough Airport Page B5 Airspace Consultation Introduction to Part B 1.3. This part explains the proposed changes to routes and airspace in the near vicinity of TAG Farnborough Airport. In particular, we aim to provide an understanding of the impacts that the proposed changes would have on people within the solid blue outlined area shown in Figures B1 (above) and B2 (on Page B7, a zoomed in view). The main focus of this document is on the impacts of establishing Farnborough departure and arrival routes which are covered in detail in Sections 1-4 of this document. We advise you to consider this information to determine the local impact on your area of interest. 1.4. We also explain consequential changes to light General Aviation (GA2) traffic flows, and to a very small number of RAF Odiham departures that would generate further potential impacts. The areas where GA and RAF Odiham flights would be affected are shown by the dashed blue outlined areas shown in Figures B1 and B2. Each is described separately in this document; Sections 5 and 6 in the document respectively for the Northern and Western blue dashed areas. Even if your primary interest is within the blue dashed areas, you should still consider Sections 1-4 as there may be other flights in the region (discussed in those Sections) that are relevant to you. 1.5. Other air traffic flows, such as Heathrow and Gatwick departures, also use the same airspace at higher altitudes in the vicinity of Farnborough. Within the solid blue outlined area of this proposal, we are not considering changes to flows other than Farnborough arrivals and departures. 1.6. We need to gather feedback from stakeholders, to enable us to understand how the change may impact you. We have included questions and a statement which are highlighted in a box like this. The easiest way to respond to the consultation is to answer these questions via the website: www.Consultation.TAGFarnboroughAirport.com 1.7. Care has been taken to make this consultation accessible to anyone who may wish to respond. The design and operation of airspace is, by its nature,
Recommended publications
  • Cardiff Airport and Gateway Development Zone SPG 2019
    Vale of Glamorgan Local Development Plan 2011- 2026 Cardiff Airport and Gateway Development Zone Supplementary Planning Guidance Local Cynllun Development Datblygu December 2019 Plan Lleol Vale of Glamorgan Local Development Plan 2011-2026 Cardiff Airport & Gateway Development Zone Supplementary Planning Guidance December 2019 This document is available in other formats upon request e.g. larger font. Please see contact details in Section 9. CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 2 3. Purpose of the Supplementary Planning Guidance .................................................................... 3 4. Status of the Guidance .............................................................................................................. 3 5. Legislative and Planning Policy Context .................................................................................... 4 5.1. National Legislation ............................................................................................................. 4 5.2. National Policy Context ....................................................................................................... 4 5.3. Local Policy Context ............................................................................................................ 5 5.4. Supplementary Planning
    [Show full text]
  • Local Authority & Airport List.Xlsx
    Airport Consultative SASIG Authority Airport(s) of Interest Airport Link Airport Owner(s) and Shareholders Airport Operator C.E.O or M.D. Committee - YES/NO Majority owner: Regional & City Airports, part of Broadland District Council Norwich International Airport https://www.norwichairport.co.uk/ Norwich Airport Ltd Richard Pace, M.D. Yes the Rigby Group (80.1%). Norwich City Cncl and Norfolk Cty Cncl each own a minority interest. London Luton Airport Buckinghamshire County Council London Luton Airport http://www.london-luton.co.uk/ Luton Borough Council (100%). Operations Ltd. (Abertis Nick Barton, C.E.O. Yes 90% Aena 10%) Heathrow Airport Holdings Ltd (formerly BAA):- Ferrovial-25%; Qatar Holding-20%; Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec-12.62%; Govt. of John Holland-Kaye, Heathrow Airport http://www.heathrow.com/ Singapore Investment Corporation-11.2%; Heathrow Airport Ltd Yes C.E.O. Alinda Capital Partners-11.18%; China Investment Corporation-10%; China Investment Corporation-10% Manchester Airports Group plc (M.A.G.):- Manchester City Council-35.5%; 9 Gtr Ken O'Toole, M.D. Cheshire East Council Manchester Airport http://www.manchesterairport.co.uk/ Manchester Airport plc Yes Manchester authorities-29%; IFM Investors- Manchester Airport 35.5% Cornwall Council Cornwall Airport Newquay http://www.newquaycornwallairport.com/ Cornwall Council (100%) Cornwall Airport Ltd Al Titterington, M.D. Yes Lands End Airport http://www.landsendairport.co.uk/ Isles of Scilly Steamship Company (100%) Lands End Airport Ltd Rob Goldsmith, CEO No http://www.scilly.gov.uk/environment- St Marys Airport, Isles of Scilly Duchy of Cornwall (100%) Theo Leisjer, C.E.
    [Show full text]
  • World Commerce Review Corporate Aviation Review
    AviationCorporate Review WORLD COMMERCE REVIEW THE NBAA REVIEW PUNCHING ABOVE ITS SIMON WILLIAMS CELEBRatES THE INNOVatION AND WEIGHT. THE MBAA ON THE ISLE OF MAN'S 10TH INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTED MALta AS AN AVIatION ANNIVERSARY AS A LEADING at EBACE2018 SUccESS STORY AIRCRAFT REGISTRY THE GLOBAL TRADE PLATFORM DETAILS MAKE THE DIFFERENCE. FEEL OUR PASSION FOR PERFECTION. Tel: +356 2137 5973 www.dc-aviation.com.mt For Business Jet Handling: [email protected] For Business Jet Charter: www.worldcommercereview.com [email protected] Foreword elcome to the WCR corporate aviation ePub. www.worldcommercereview.com Our remit is to provide an interactive forum for existing users and new entrants to the sector. W Those who have integrated corporate aviation into their business plan will tell you of the productivity and profit en- hancements it can offer. They will point to the key benefit of flexibility and the ability to quickly rearrange planning and the ability to move key staff at business-critical moments and close the deal quickly and efficiently. Many will point to technologies such as video and telepresence as viable alternatives and whilst these systems are valuable and useful in their own right, they cannot offer the one to one human meetings that corporate aviation can. Many cultures in key markets express a preference for person-to-person meetings and a traditional handshake can seal the deal. In this corporate aviation offers benefits that cannot be matched. We will endeavour to show both shareholders and others with an interest in the company’s well-being in interna- tional markets that corporate aviation can help to drive new business and consolidate markets.
    [Show full text]
  • FAC Interface Magazine Cover
    Christmas Edition 2020 interFACe The magazine of the Farnborough Aerospace Consortium In This Issue: Member Spotlight FAC Chief FAC office closure Executive David Barnes interview in FAC Aviation Business News Chairman Sir Beagle Technology Group Page 4 Page 2 Donald Spiers Page 1 FCoT ARIC Ground Breaking The FAC Chairman Donald Spiers attended the ground breaking ceremony for the new Aerospace Research and Innovation Centre at Farnborough College of Technology at the beginning of December and gave this speech: ‘I am delighted to be here today to take part in this ground-breaking ceremony for the new Aerospace Research and Innovation Centre. Aerospace is a very important sector of the UK economy and is supported by a large number of small engineering companies, SMEs, based in the SE of England. The year 2020 has been a difficult year for Aerospace, in both operational and manufacturing, but it will bounce back strongly in 2021 and indeed the signs are already there. One of those signs is this centre, because the future is dependent on new ideas and that requires training young engineers in Research and Innovation to develop those new ideas. FCoT has always been closely involved with the aerospace sector, and indeed Virginia Barrett is a Director of the Farnborough Aerospace Consortium, the trade association for SMEs in the Aerospace sector. The Government also realised the importance of innovation in aerospace some years ago and set up the National Aerospace Technology Exploitation Programme (NATEP) to provide funding for SMEs to develop new ideas. FAC is involved in the administration of this programme and I have no doubt that engineers trained in this new facility will become involved in NATEP in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Business Aviation Companies
    UK Business Aviation Companies Please do not reproduce with prior permission from the Royal Aeronautical Society. Acropolis Aviation Limited Email: [email protected] Office 114-115 Web: www.catreus.co.uk Business Aviation Centre Farnborough Cello Aviation Ltd Hampshire Gill Group House GU14 6XA 140 Holyhead Road Tel: +44 (0) 1252 526530 Birmingham Email: chartersales@acropolis- B21 0AF aviation.com Tel: +44 (0) 121 507 8700 Web: www.acropolis-aviation.com Email: [email protected] Web: www.flycello.com Aeronexus Long Border Road Centreline AV Ltd Stansted Airport Bristol Airport London Bristol CM24 1RE BS48 3DP Tel: +44 (0) 1702 346852 Tel: +44 (0) 1275 474601 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Web: www.aeronexus.aero Web: www.centreline.aero Air Charter Scotland DragonFly Executive Air Charter Signature Terminal 1 The White Building Percival Way Cardiff International Airport Luton Airport Southside LU2 9NT Vale of Glamorgan Tel: +44 (0) 1357 578161 Wales Web: www.aircharterscotland.com CF62 3BD Tel: +44 (0) 1446 711144 Blu Halkin Ltd Email: [email protected] 7 Torriano Mews Web: www.dragonflyac.co.uk London NW5 2RZ Excellence Aviation Services Ltd Tel: +44 (0) 20 3086 9876 Farnborough Business Airport Web: www.halkinjet.com Hampshire GU14 6XA Bookajet Tel: +44 (0) 7860 258048 Business Aviation Centre Web: www.excellence-aviation.com Farnborough Airport Farnborough ExecuJet Europe Hampshire CPC2 Capital Park GU14 6XA Fulbourn Cambridge Catreus CB21 5XE 67a Victoria Road Tel: +44 (0) 1223 637265 Horley
    [Show full text]
  • Gatwick Airport 'Runway 2' Airspace Management Options Review
    A Second Runway for Gatwick Appendix A26 Airspace Gatwick Airport ‘Runway 2’ Airspace Management Options Review Final Version 31 March 2014 Prepared by NATS Services NATS Protected 2 Gatwick Airport ‘Runway 2’ Airspace Management Options Review Gatwick Airport ‘Runway 2’ Airspace Management Options Review Prepared by: NATS Services Final Version 31 March 2014 © NATS (Services) Limited 2014 All information contained within this report is deemed NATS Protectively Marked Information. NATS Protectively Marked information is being made available to GAL for the sole purpose of granting to GAL free user rights to the contents of the report for informing GAL’s RWY 2 team on finalising its ground infrastructure development strategy. NATS does not warrant the accuracy and completeness of the content and is not responsible for updating the content. The content in no way constitute formal NATS statement or recommendations on actual airspace changes required to incorporate an additional runway at Gatwick within the London TMA. Any use of or reliance on the information by GAL and third parties are entirely at your own risks. The circulation of NATS Protectively Marked information is restricted. GAL is authorised to submit NATS Protectively Marked Information contained within this report to the Airports’ Commission, however GAL should make such disclosure subject to a disclaimer that NATS Protectively Marked Information is intended to provide operational expert opinion on the general ATM management impacts (within the immediate airspace around the airport) of GAL requirements based on the ground design options (such as the requirement to manage arrival streams based upon parking position). Save for expressly permitted herewith, NATS Protectively Marked Information shall not be disclosed except with NATS’ prior permission in writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Providers of the Hold Baggage NXCT
    Approved providers of the hold baggage NXCT Airport Management Services Terminal Building, Inverness Airport, Inverness, IV2 7JB 01667 461 533 or 01667 461 535 Gary Stoddart [email protected] ASTACC 77 New Abbey Road,Dumfries,DG2 7LA 01387 265232 Jeff Golightly [email protected] AviationSec 6 Mill Cottages, Grindley Brook, Whitchurch, SY13 4QH 07802 221365 Andrew Hudson [email protected] Avsec Global Ltd Business Incubation Centre,University of Chichester, Bognor Regis Campus, Upper Bognor Road, Bognor Regis,West Sussex, United Kingdom, PO21 1HR Chris Barratt [email protected] Sara Gladstone [email protected] Babcock International Group Mission Critical Services Offshore Aviation, Babcock International Group, Farburn Terrace, Aberdeen Airport East, Dyce, Aberdeen , Aberdeenshire , AB21 7DT Brenda Tait [email protected] Belfast City Airport Belfast, BT3 9JH, Northern Ireland 028 9093 9093 Ray Jeffries [email protected] Bournemouth Airport Christchurch, Dorset, BH 23 6SE 01446712621 Tony Brogden [email protected] Browns UK Training Services 72 Evelyn Crescent, Sunbury Middlesex,TW16 6LZ 07841 590787 Rodger Brown [email protected] Cardiff Airport Vale of Glamorgan, Wales, CF62 3BD +44 (0) 7342 949255 Clive Parsons [email protected] CargoTRACKER More House, 514 Finchley Road, London NW11 8DD 020 8458 7720 Ron Haviv [email protected] City of Derry Airport CODA(Operations) Ltd, Airport Road, Eglinton, County Derry, BT47 3GY 028 71 81 07 84 Tracy Duffy
    [Show full text]
  • Temporary Controlled Airspace for the London 2012 Olympics
    STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION DOCUMENT Proposal To Establish Temporary Controlled Airspace For The London 2012 Olympics 2012 Olympics Temporary Airspace Change, Stakeholder Consultation Page 1 of 46 Contents 1. Executive Summary ....................................................................................... 3 2. Introduction................................................................................................... 4 3. The purpose of consultation........................................................................... 5 4. What happens now? How do I respond? ....................................................... 6 5. Development Objectives ................................................................................ 8 6. Proposed airspace change for Farnborough CTA/CTR .................................... 9 7. Proposed CAS(T) Boscombe Down, Farnborough, Southampton and Bournemouth Area .............................................................................................. 14 8. Southend CTA/CTR and En Route Changes for Olympics .............................. 26 9. CAS(T) around East Anglia (For Luton, Cranfield and Cambridge) ............... 34 10. Design options ............................................................................................. 36 11. Next steps.................................................................................................... 36 12. References................................................................................................... 37 Appendix A: List of Stakeholders........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • REGISTERED NUMBER: 12123129 (England and Wales)
    REGISTERED NUMBER: 12123129 (England and Wales) Group Strategic Report, Directors' Report and Consolidated Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31 December 2020 for Farnborough Airport Bidco Limited Farnborough Airport Bidco Limited Contents of the Consolidated Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31 December 2020 Page Company Information 1 Group Strategic Report 2 Directors' Report 9 Directors' Responsibilities Statement 13 Independent Auditor's Report 14 Consolidated Profit and Loss Account 17 Consolidated Balance Sheet 18 Company Balance Sheet 19 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 20 Company Statement of Changes in Equity 21 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 22 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 23 Farnborough Airport Bidco Limited Company Information for the Year Ended 31 December 2020 DIRECTORS: J K Bruen S B Geere B O'Reilly SECRETARY: T&H Secretarial Services Limited REGISTERED OFFICE: 3 Bunhill Row London England EC1Y 8YZ REGISTERED NUMBER: 12123129 (England and Wales) AUDITOR: Deloitte LLP Statutory Auditor London United Kingdom Page 1 Farnborough Airport Bidco Limited Group Strategic Report for the Year Ended 31 December 2020 The Directors present their Strategic Report for the year ended 31 December 2020 (2019: 23 week period from 25 July to 31 December 2019). This Strategic Report has been prepared for the Group as a whole and therefore gives greater emphasis to those matters which are significant to Farnborough Airport Bidco Limited (the "Group") and its subsidiary undertakings when viewed as a whole. The Directors, in preparing this Strategic Report, have complied with s414C of the Companies Act 2006. PURPOSE AND STRATEGY The Group’s principal activities are the operation of Farnborough Airport, offering a full service private airport for passengers, crew and aircraft, private aviation services, and the Aviator Hotel.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Groups Warn Government Over Aviation CO2 Emissions As Major New Report Is Launched
    AirportWatch bulletin 44 July 2011 Green groups warn Government over aviation CO2 emissions as major new report is launched A major new report has just been produced for AirportWatch entitled “Aviation and Climate Change Policy in the UK”, setting out a sophisticated policy mix of tough measures to control and reduce UK aviation’s growing carbon footprint that endorses the seminal December 2009 Committee on Climate Change (CCC) report “Meeting the UK Aviation Target”. It says Government must retain the current UK aviation CO2 target and adopt the Committee on Climate Change recommended flight limits in full. “Back door” airport expansion via the planning system needs to be stopped right away until a new UK-wide aviation policy in place. The report calls for clear confirmation that absolute UK aviation CO2 emissions should be no higher than 2005 levels in 2050, a total of 37.5 million tonnes (Mt) CO2 (as a minimum requirement). Any UK airport expansion must fit within the 37.5 Mt total. Also that this target should be strengthened by setting interim goals, so that average UK aviation emissions not to exceed 37.5 MtCO2 in any 5 year period through to 2050. There must also be mandatory regular updates on the non-CO2 impacts of aviation – NOx, condensation trails and cloud formation – which are known to cause at least double the climate impact of CO2 alone. The 2050 target must be adjusted in the light of evolving atmospheric / climate change scientific knowledge The report has been produced shortly before the DfT responds, by the end of July, to the CCC on how aviation growth can be compatible with climate change targets.
    [Show full text]
  • AVIATION by Robert W
    ANNUAL PRIVATIZATION REPORT: AVIATION by Robert W. Poole, Jr. Project Director: Austill Stuart May 2020 Reason Foundation’s mission is to advance a free society by developing, applying and promoting libertarian principles, including individual liberty, free markets and the rule of law. We use journalism and public policy research to influence the frameworks and actions of policymakers, journalists and opinion leaders. Reason Foundation’s nonpartisan public policy research promotes choice, competition and a dynamic market economy as the foundation for human dignity and progress. Reason produces rigorous, peer- reviewed research and directly engages the policy process, seeking strategies that emphasize cooperation, flexibility, local knowledge and results. Through practical and innovative approaches to complex problems, Reason seeks to change the way people think about issues, and promote policies that allow and encourage individuals and voluntary institutions to flourish. Reason Foundation is a tax-exempt research and education organization as defined under IRS code 501(c)(3). Reason Foundation is supported by voluntary contributions from individuals, foundations and corporations. The views are those of the author, not necessarily those of Reason Foundation or its trustees. TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1 OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................ 1 PART 2 AIRPORTS ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LIST of REFERENCES ITW GSE 400 Hz Gpus AIRPORTS
    Page 1 of 15 January 2017 LIST OF REFERENCES ITW GSE 400 Hz GPUs AIRPORTS Alger Airport Algeria 2005 Zvartnots Airport Armenia 2007 Brisbane Airport Australia 2013 Melbourne Airport Australia 2011-14 Perth Airport Australia 2011-12-13 Klagenfurt Airport Austria 1993 Vienna International Airport Austria 1995-2001-14-15 Bahrain International Airport Bahrain 2010-12 Minsk Airport Belarus 2014 Brussels International Airport Belgium 2001-02-08-15-16 Charleroi Airport Belgium 2006 Sofia Airport Bulgaria 2005 Air Burkina Burkina Faso 2004 Punta Arenas Chile 2001 Santiago Airport Chile 2011 Pointe Noitre Airport Congo Brazzaville 2009-10 Dubrovnik Airport Croatia 2014-16 La Habana Airport Cuba 2010 Larnaca Airport Cyprus 2008 Ostrava Airport Czech Republic 2010 Prague Airport Czech Republic 1996-97-2002-04-05-07-12-14-16 Aalborg Airport Denmark 1997-98-99-2012-15 Billund Airport Denmark 1999-2000-02-08-12-13-16 Copenhagen Airports Authorities Denmark 89-93-99-2000-01-03-07-09-10-11-12-13-14-15-16 Esbjerg Airport Denmark 2007-08-14 Hans Christian Andersen Airport (Odense) Denmark 1991-95-2015 Roenne Airport Denmark 1993 Karup Airport Denmark 1997-2016 Curacao Airport Dutch Antilles 2007 Cairo Intl. Airport Egypt 2015 Tallinn Airport Estonia 2004-05-14 Aéroport de Malabo Equatorial Guinea 2012 Vága Floghavn Faroe Islands 2015 Helsinki-Vantaa Airport Finland 1996-97-2000-05-06-09-10-13-14 Rovaniemi Airport Finland 2000 Turku Airport Finland 2014 Aéroport d’Aiglemont for Prince Aga Khan France 20007 Aéroport de Biarritz France 2009 Aéroport de Brest
    [Show full text]