UK Business Aviation Companies
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Cardiff Airport and Gateway Development Zone SPG 2019
Vale of Glamorgan Local Development Plan 2011- 2026 Cardiff Airport and Gateway Development Zone Supplementary Planning Guidance Local Cynllun Development Datblygu December 2019 Plan Lleol Vale of Glamorgan Local Development Plan 2011-2026 Cardiff Airport & Gateway Development Zone Supplementary Planning Guidance December 2019 This document is available in other formats upon request e.g. larger font. Please see contact details in Section 9. CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 2 3. Purpose of the Supplementary Planning Guidance .................................................................... 3 4. Status of the Guidance .............................................................................................................. 3 5. Legislative and Planning Policy Context .................................................................................... 4 5.1. National Legislation ............................................................................................................. 4 5.2. National Policy Context ....................................................................................................... 4 5.3. Local Policy Context ............................................................................................................ 5 5.4. Supplementary Planning -
Local Authority & Airport List.Xlsx
Airport Consultative SASIG Authority Airport(s) of Interest Airport Link Airport Owner(s) and Shareholders Airport Operator C.E.O or M.D. Committee - YES/NO Majority owner: Regional & City Airports, part of Broadland District Council Norwich International Airport https://www.norwichairport.co.uk/ Norwich Airport Ltd Richard Pace, M.D. Yes the Rigby Group (80.1%). Norwich City Cncl and Norfolk Cty Cncl each own a minority interest. London Luton Airport Buckinghamshire County Council London Luton Airport http://www.london-luton.co.uk/ Luton Borough Council (100%). Operations Ltd. (Abertis Nick Barton, C.E.O. Yes 90% Aena 10%) Heathrow Airport Holdings Ltd (formerly BAA):- Ferrovial-25%; Qatar Holding-20%; Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec-12.62%; Govt. of John Holland-Kaye, Heathrow Airport http://www.heathrow.com/ Singapore Investment Corporation-11.2%; Heathrow Airport Ltd Yes C.E.O. Alinda Capital Partners-11.18%; China Investment Corporation-10%; China Investment Corporation-10% Manchester Airports Group plc (M.A.G.):- Manchester City Council-35.5%; 9 Gtr Ken O'Toole, M.D. Cheshire East Council Manchester Airport http://www.manchesterairport.co.uk/ Manchester Airport plc Yes Manchester authorities-29%; IFM Investors- Manchester Airport 35.5% Cornwall Council Cornwall Airport Newquay http://www.newquaycornwallairport.com/ Cornwall Council (100%) Cornwall Airport Ltd Al Titterington, M.D. Yes Lands End Airport http://www.landsendairport.co.uk/ Isles of Scilly Steamship Company (100%) Lands End Airport Ltd Rob Goldsmith, CEO No http://www.scilly.gov.uk/environment- St Marys Airport, Isles of Scilly Duchy of Cornwall (100%) Theo Leisjer, C.E. -
World Commerce Review Corporate Aviation Review
AviationCorporate Review WORLD COMMERCE REVIEW THE NBAA REVIEW PUNCHING ABOVE ITS SIMON WILLIAMS CELEBRatES THE INNOVatION AND WEIGHT. THE MBAA ON THE ISLE OF MAN'S 10TH INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTED MALta AS AN AVIatION ANNIVERSARY AS A LEADING at EBACE2018 SUccESS STORY AIRCRAFT REGISTRY THE GLOBAL TRADE PLATFORM DETAILS MAKE THE DIFFERENCE. FEEL OUR PASSION FOR PERFECTION. Tel: +356 2137 5973 www.dc-aviation.com.mt For Business Jet Handling: [email protected] For Business Jet Charter: www.worldcommercereview.com [email protected] Foreword elcome to the WCR corporate aviation ePub. www.worldcommercereview.com Our remit is to provide an interactive forum for existing users and new entrants to the sector. W Those who have integrated corporate aviation into their business plan will tell you of the productivity and profit en- hancements it can offer. They will point to the key benefit of flexibility and the ability to quickly rearrange planning and the ability to move key staff at business-critical moments and close the deal quickly and efficiently. Many will point to technologies such as video and telepresence as viable alternatives and whilst these systems are valuable and useful in their own right, they cannot offer the one to one human meetings that corporate aviation can. Many cultures in key markets express a preference for person-to-person meetings and a traditional handshake can seal the deal. In this corporate aviation offers benefits that cannot be matched. We will endeavour to show both shareholders and others with an interest in the company’s well-being in interna- tional markets that corporate aviation can help to drive new business and consolidate markets. -
Economic Impact
LAAG/8/D Town & Country Planning Act 1990 - Section 77 Town & Country Planning (Inquiries Procedure) (England) Rules 2000 Lydd Airport Action Group (LAAG) Rebuttal of LAA/4/A Economic Impact Applicant: London Ashford Airport Limited Location: London Ashford Airport Limited, Lydd, Romney Marsh, TN29 9QL Applications: Y06/1647/SH and Y06/1648/SH Proposals: 294m runway extension and a 150m starter extension plus a new terminal to accommodate up to 500,000ppa Inspectorate APP/L2250/V/10/2131934 References: APP/L2250/V/10/2131936 Document Reference: LAAG/8/D Louise Barton, BSc (Ag), MCSI Lydd Airport Action Group The Hook Madeira Road Littlestone, Kent TN28 QX February 21st, 2011 1 1.0 Scope of evidence 1.1 In this rebuttal I address issues presented in the socio economic proof of evidence submitted by Louise Congdon on behalf of London Ashford Airport (Lydd Airport). 1.2 My silence on a point made in this proof or the fact that I have not addressed it should not be taken as my agreement with that point. 1.3 I reserve the right to make further comments. 1.4 Figures in square brackets refer to paragraph numbers in LAA/4/A. 2.0: The Policy Context 2.1 LAAG has not covered the policy context other than conformity to the Aviation White Paper and will confine comments to this paper: We stand by the comments made in LAAG/9/A. 2.2 In [3.3] of LAA/4/A the author refers to the importance of travel highlighted in the White paper and in 3.4 states ”The White Paper goes on to say that: “Our starting point is that we must make best use of existing airport capacity”; but goes on to make clear that making best use did not preclude the development of additional terminal or even runway capacity. -
FAC Interface Magazine Cover
Christmas Edition 2020 interFACe The magazine of the Farnborough Aerospace Consortium In This Issue: Member Spotlight FAC Chief FAC office closure Executive David Barnes interview in FAC Aviation Business News Chairman Sir Beagle Technology Group Page 4 Page 2 Donald Spiers Page 1 FCoT ARIC Ground Breaking The FAC Chairman Donald Spiers attended the ground breaking ceremony for the new Aerospace Research and Innovation Centre at Farnborough College of Technology at the beginning of December and gave this speech: ‘I am delighted to be here today to take part in this ground-breaking ceremony for the new Aerospace Research and Innovation Centre. Aerospace is a very important sector of the UK economy and is supported by a large number of small engineering companies, SMEs, based in the SE of England. The year 2020 has been a difficult year for Aerospace, in both operational and manufacturing, but it will bounce back strongly in 2021 and indeed the signs are already there. One of those signs is this centre, because the future is dependent on new ideas and that requires training young engineers in Research and Innovation to develop those new ideas. FCoT has always been closely involved with the aerospace sector, and indeed Virginia Barrett is a Director of the Farnborough Aerospace Consortium, the trade association for SMEs in the Aerospace sector. The Government also realised the importance of innovation in aerospace some years ago and set up the National Aerospace Technology Exploitation Programme (NATEP) to provide funding for SMEs to develop new ideas. FAC is involved in the administration of this programme and I have no doubt that engineers trained in this new facility will become involved in NATEP in the future. -
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ ES1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Business Plan Process .................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Airport Profile .............................................................................................................. 3 2.0 EXISTING AIRPORT CHARACTERISTICS............................................................................ 5 2.1 Physical Characteristics ............................................................................................... 5 2.2 Existing Airport Tenants .............................................................................................. 6 2.3 Management Structure ............................................................................................... 7 2.4 Historical Airport Data ................................................................................................. 8 2.5 Baseline Financial Data ................................................................................................ 9 3.0 AIRPORT MARKET AREA .............................................................................................. 11 4.0 SWOT ANALYSIS FOR WATERBURY-OXFORD AIRPORT ................................................. 15 4.1 SWOT Components .................................................................................................. -
December, While Still Dry
MEMBERS AT LARGE Lee, Dorothy Ann (Rod Paul) Wheelock, Mary Imogene (Travis W.) Glanville-Williams, Layne (David) 800 E. Village Court 4201 Evelyn 130J Cairnhill Road Newark, Ohio 43055 Bossier C ity, Louisiana 71010 Singapore 9, Republic of Singapore 366-3838 746-8696 375 662 Lewis, Helen L. (Carrol D.) 1541 Mound Avenue NORTHWEST SECTION BRITISH SECTION Jacksonville, Illinois 62650 Boe, Penelope Liebeler (Arvid J.) Richardson, Patricia A. J. (John) 245-4629 1002 Seventh Street 4 Dalewood Rise, Laverstock Newbery, Norma Sharalyn (Frank E.) Langdon, North Dakota 58249 Salisbury, Wiltshire, England Route 3 256-5334 Salisbury 5762 Jacksonville, Illinois 62650 Nelson, Gloria H. (Morris T.) FINNISH SECTION 245-7091 Stanley, North Dakota 58784 Hyttinen, Irma Anneli (Otto) Wheeler, Virginia Mae 701-628-2725 Viikatetie 5 Route 1 Waltz, Mary Ruth (Donald M.) Hamevaara, Finland Ashland, Illinois 62612 R. Route 1, Box 24 542 875 217-886-2540 Monticello, Wisconsin 53570 EAST CANADA SECTION Collins, Carolyn M. (D. Kirk) Borup, Joan (Lyle) Pritchard, Suzanne (James) 6210 Robin Lane 4930 Center Way 311 Collingwood Street Crystal Lake, Illinois 60014 Eugene, Oregon 97405 Kingston, Ontario, Canada 815-459-6210 345-5812 542-2269 Havice, Lucy Thelma (Andrew J.) Rand, Nancy Jean (Duncan) 131 Williamsburg Drive SOUTHWEST SECTION 365 Berkshire Drive Bartlett, Illinois 60103 Hartman, Lillian M. (Robert G.) London 63, Ontario, Canada 289-5061 733 South San Jacinto 472-3923 Icenogle, Jeanne Marie (Robert) Hemet, California 92343 281 Jefferson 658-6633 WESTERN CANADIAN SECTION Hoffman Est., Illinois 60172 Folkins, Rosalie Marta (Lynn B.) Frier, Dorothy C. (Dr. Donald) 529-3009 Box 4569 7509 Huntervalley Rd., N. -
June 2021 Issue 45 Ai Rpi Lo T
JUNE 2021 ISSUE 45 AI RPI LO T INSIDE HRHTHE DUKE OF EDINBURGH 1921-2021 A Portrait of our Patron RED ARROWS IN 2021 & BEYOND Exclusive Interview with Red One OXFORD v CAMBRIDGE AIR RACE DIARY With the gradual relaxing of lockdown restrictions the Company is hopeful that the followingevents will be able to take place ‘in person’ as opposed to ‘virtually’. These are obviously subject to any subsequent change THE HONOURABLE COMPANY in regulations and members are advised to check OF AIR PILOTS before making travel plans. incorporating Air Navigators JUNE 2021 FORMER PATRON: 26 th Air Pilot Flying Club Fly-in Duxford His Royal Highness 30 th T&A Committee Air Pilot House (APH) The Prince Philip Duke of Edinburgh KG KT JULY 2021 7th ACEC APH GRAND MASTER: 11 th Air Pilot Flying Club Fly-in Henstridge His Royal Highness th The Prince Andrew 13 APBF APH th Duke of York KG GCVO 13 Summer Supper Girdlers’ Hall 15 th GP&F APH th MASTER: 15 Court Cutlers’ Hall Sqn Ldr Nick Goodwyn MA Dip Psych CFS RAF (ret) 21 st APT/AST APH 22 nd Livery Dinner Carpenters’ Hall CLERK: 25 th Air Pilot Flying Club Fly-in Weybourne Paul J Tacon BA FCIS AUGUST 2021 Incorporated by Royal Charter. 3rd Air Pilot Flying Club Fly-in Lee on the Solent A Livery Company of the City of London. 10 th Air Pilot Flying Club Fly-in Popham PUBLISHED BY: 15 th Air Pilot Flying Club The Honourable Company of Air Pilots, Summer BBQ White Waltham Air Pilots House, 52A Borough High Street, London SE1 1XN SEPTEMBER 2021 EMAIL : [email protected] 15 th APPL APH www.airpilots.org 15 th Air Pilot Flying Club Fly-in Oaksey Park th EDITOR: 16 GP&F APH Allan Winn EMAIL: [email protected] 16 th Court Cutlers’ Hall 21 st Luncheon Club RAF Club DEPUTY EDITOR: 21 st Tymms Lecture RAF Club Stephen Bridgewater EMAIL: [email protected] 30 th Air Pilot Flying Club Fly-in Compton Abbas SUB EDITOR: Charlotte Bailey Applications forVisits and Events EDITORIAL CONTRIBUTIONS: The copy deadline for the August 2021 edition of Air Pilot Please kindly note that we are ceasing publication of is 1 st July 2021. -
Gatwick Airport 'Runway 2' Airspace Management Options Review
A Second Runway for Gatwick Appendix A26 Airspace Gatwick Airport ‘Runway 2’ Airspace Management Options Review Final Version 31 March 2014 Prepared by NATS Services NATS Protected 2 Gatwick Airport ‘Runway 2’ Airspace Management Options Review Gatwick Airport ‘Runway 2’ Airspace Management Options Review Prepared by: NATS Services Final Version 31 March 2014 © NATS (Services) Limited 2014 All information contained within this report is deemed NATS Protectively Marked Information. NATS Protectively Marked information is being made available to GAL for the sole purpose of granting to GAL free user rights to the contents of the report for informing GAL’s RWY 2 team on finalising its ground infrastructure development strategy. NATS does not warrant the accuracy and completeness of the content and is not responsible for updating the content. The content in no way constitute formal NATS statement or recommendations on actual airspace changes required to incorporate an additional runway at Gatwick within the London TMA. Any use of or reliance on the information by GAL and third parties are entirely at your own risks. The circulation of NATS Protectively Marked information is restricted. GAL is authorised to submit NATS Protectively Marked Information contained within this report to the Airports’ Commission, however GAL should make such disclosure subject to a disclaimer that NATS Protectively Marked Information is intended to provide operational expert opinion on the general ATM management impacts (within the immediate airspace around the airport) of GAL requirements based on the ground design options (such as the requirement to manage arrival streams based upon parking position). Save for expressly permitted herewith, NATS Protectively Marked Information shall not be disclosed except with NATS’ prior permission in writing. -
Independent Schools Inspectorate 2021 Full Name CAE Oxford Aviation Academy (Oxford)
EDUCATIONAL OVERSIGHT INSPECTION OF PRIVATE FURTHER EDUCATION COLLEGES AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE SCHOOLS OXFORD AVIATION ACADEMY (OXFORD) LTD (Company registration no. – 6277278) © Independent Schools Inspectorate 2021 Full Name CAE Oxford Aviation Academy (Oxford) Addresses Oxford Airport, Kidlington, Oxford, OX5 1QX CAE (Gatwick), Diamond Point, Fleming Way, Crawley, West Sussex RH10 9DP Parent\Company name CAE inc Telephone Number 01865 841 234 Email Address [email protected] Website www.cae.com Principal Mr Andrew Boomer Proprietor Oxford Aviation Academy Reg number: 6277278 Age Range 18+ Total number of students 366 Numbers by age and type 18+: 366 of study FE only: 366 Inspection dates 18 – 20 May 2021 © Independent Schools Inspectorate 2021 PREFACE This inspection report follows the Framework for Educational Oversight of private further education colleges and English language schools. The inspection consists of a three-day team inspection of the institution’s educational provision. The ISI is an approved Educational Oversight body authorised by the Home Office to inspect privately funded further education colleges and English language schools in England and Wales offering courses on the Qualifications and Credit Framework. It is designed to improve the quality of education on offer to international students who attend UK colleges through student visas. ISI inspections are required to: Report on the extent to which colleges comply with the published Educational Oversight Standards; Assess and report on the quality of educational outcomes and provision; Where applicable, make recommendations outside the scope of the Standards to support continued improvement of quality. Inspection provides objective and reliable reports on the quality of colleges, and by placing reports in the public domain, makes this information available to students, Government and the wider community. -
2. Policy Context and Update
Page 5 2. Policy Context and Update 2.1. This chapter gives a brief overview of the planning policy context for the proposed development, and also provides an ‘update’ where policy guidance has altered or progressed. This chapter is not intended to provide a full summary of the relevant planning policy, which can be reviewed in the planning statements that accompanied the Planning Applications, as updated here. The Aviation White Paper 2.2. The Government’s White Paper, the ‘Future of Air Transport’ (referred to as the Aviation White Paper) provides the strategic framework for the development of air travel over the next 30 years. The key objective identified in the White Paper is the need to balance a rise in the affordability of air travel against the protection of the environment. The White Paper acknowledges that the failure to allow for growth in air travel would have significant economic impacts at a regional and national level. 2.3. The White Paper supports a strategy for a ‘balanced approach’, which recognises the need to expand existing airports rather than building new ones. It advises that the expansion of existing regional airports must be incorporated in the relevant policy documents, in order to achieve planned and sustainable growth. Existing airport operators are expected to produce master plans or, where appropriate, to update existing master plans to take account of the conclusions on future development set out in the White Paper. 2.4. The White Paper acknowledges that the difficulties of attaining a balance are most acute in the South East. Over half of the 200 million journeys through UK airports in 2003 were through airports in the South East, and this trend is forecast to continue. -
Lydd Airport
LAA/11/D THE PLANNING INSPECTORATE APP/L2250/V/10/2131934 & APP/L2250/V/10/2131936 SECTION 77 TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – REFERENCE OF APPLICATIONS TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (INQUIRIES PROCEDURE) (ENGLAND) RULES 2000 REBUTTAL PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF STUART COVENTRY MA CARBON MANAGEMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE MATTERS In respect of: Planning Application Reference: Y06/1647/SH (New Terminal Building) Planning Application Reference: Y06/1648/SH (Runway Extension) relating to land at London Ashford Airport, Lydd, Romney Marsh, Kent, TN29 9QL February 2011 URS/Scott Wilson URS/Scott Wilson Scott House Alencon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP Tel: + 44 (0) 1256 310200 Fax: + 44 (0) 1256 310201 Contents Page 1. Introduction 4 2. Climate Change Issues in Aviation Policy and Airport Expansion Decisions 5 3. Emissions from Aircraft using London Ashford Airport 7 4. Information Provided by the Applicant 8 5. Summary and Conclusion 9 Page 4 1. Introduction 1.1. This Rebuttal Proof of Evidence has been prepared in response to certain evidence and written statements submitted by a number of Rule 6 parties in connection with carbon and climate change. In particular, I deal in this Rebuttal with certain parts of the evidence of Sean Furey on behalf of CPRE (CPRE/06/A), Brian Lloyd on behalf of Protect Kent (CPRE/01/A) and the Written Representation from the RSPB (RSPB 5/A). 1.2. I set out my comments on this evidence and statement by way of assistance to the inquiry. These comments are not intended to be exhaustive and, where I do not refer to a specific point, this does not mean that I accept it.