DOCSLIB.ORG

Yom Ha'atzmaut and the Disappearance of the Three Oaths

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Yom Ha'atzmaut and the Disappearance of the Three Oaths Yom Ha’atzmaut and the Disappearance of The Three Oaths: An Analysis of Rav Shaul Yisraeli’s Approach hen we look back gratefully on the many obstacles that Am Yisrael Rabbi Daniel Mann hasW overcome on the way to Jewish Ram, RIETS Israel Kollel statehood in Eretz Yisrael, one of Dayan, Eretz Hemdah the most intriguing to the student of Torah is the Three Oaths: does] Rav Yehuda [respond]? There is Yisrael. We also see that Rav Zeira ר’ זירא הוה קמשתמיט מיניה דרב יהודה, another verse: “I administered an oath disagreed, and reasoned that it was דבעא למיסק לארץ ישראל, דאמר רב יהודה: to you, Daughters of Jerusalem, by deer permitted for him as an individual, but כל העולה מבבל לארץ ישראל עובר בעשה, and gazelles of the field lest you arouse he conceded that it did preclude going שנאמר )ירמיהו כז,כב(: “בבלה יובאו ושמה and lest you awaken the love until it is there “as a wall,” for which we accept יהיו עד יום פקדי אותם נאם ה’”. ורבי זירא? desirable” (Shir Hashirim 2:7). [How Rashi’s explanation as by force, or ההוא בכלי שרת כתיב. ורב יהודה? כתיב קרא .does] Rav Zeira [respond]? That verse perhaps, en masse אחרינא )שיר השירים ב,ז(: “השבעתי אתכם teaches that they should not go up in a While there were groups of Jews who בנות ירושלים בצבאות או באילות השדה אם wall (or as a wall) [in force (Rashi)]. came to Eretz Yisrael throughout the תעירו ואם תעוררו את האהבה עד שתחפץ”. How does] Rav Yehuda [respond]? ages, there was no attempt to come en] ורבי זירא? ההוא שלא יעלו ישראל בחומה. There is another such verse (actually masse from the time of Rav Yehuda ורב יהודה? השבעתי אחרינא כתיב )שם two—ibid 3:5, 8:4). [How does] Rav and Rav Zeira until the era of Modern ג,ה; שם ח,ד(. ורבי זירא? ההוא מיבעי ליה Zeira [respond]? That is needed for Zionism. At the time that the religious לכדרבי יוסי ברבי חנינא, דאמר: ג’ שבועות the statement of Rabbi Yossi b’Rabbi community and its rabbinic leadership הללו למה? אחת, שלא יעלו ישראל בחומה; Chanina, who said: “Why are there these were debating the merits and dangers ואחת, שהשביע הקדוש ברוך הוא את ישראל three oaths? One, that they should not of Zionism, the Three Oaths were שלא ימרדו באומות העולם; ואחת, שהשביע go up in force, and one, that Hashem among the issues at the fore. Perhaps הקדוש ברוך הוא את העובדי כוכבים שלא administered an oath that they not the most extreme position and most ישתעבדו בהן בישראל יותר מדאי. Rav Zeira was avoiding Rav Yehuda, for rebel against the nations, and one that systematic treatment of the topic [Rav Zeira] wanted to move to Eretz Hashem administered an oath on the was that of the Satmar Rebbe, who Yisrael, and Rav Yehuda said: Whoever nations that they not overly enslave championed the opinions of those who moves from Bavel to Eretz Yisrael Israel.” opposed the establishment of a Jewish violates a positive commandment, as Ketubot 110b state before the time of Mashiach as it says: “They will be brought to Bavel We see that Rav Yehuda posited that an affront to the divine will. His book, and they will be there until the day I the verses that rejected prematurely Vayoel Moshe, came out well after the recall them, says Hashem” (Yirmiyahu renewing the loving relationship establishment of the State, and in his 27:22). [How does] Rav Zeira [learn between Hashem and Bnei Yisrael view, the success in the establishment this verse]? This is written about the precluded even individuals from and initial survival of the State did vessels of the Beit Hamikdash. [How leaving the exile of Bavel for Eretz nothing to change his mind. 16 Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary • The Benjamin and Rose Berger CJF Torah To-Go Series • Yom Haatzmaut 5777 Several explanations have been presentation (in Eretz Hemdah given to justify the actions of the I:1:6) is that he deals with the giving Zionist movement, which strove and and receiving of this permission of succeeded to bring large masses of the nations in halachic terms and Jews to Eretz Yisrael to establish a guidelines. In this chapter, Rav Yisraeli fully viable state, including a powerful discusses the above thesis within an standing army.1 One is to deny that analysis of the Avnei Nezer4 based on the Gemara of the Three Oaths was the aforementioned opinion of Rashi. meant to be an operative halachic The fact that the relevant powers statement but a theoretical aggadic allowed Jews to move to Eretz Yisrael 2 Some point out that the main one. made this move a halachic possibility. decisors of halacha, such as the Rif, However, reasoned Rav Yisraeli, Rav Shaul Yisraeli z.t.l. (1909- Rambam, and Rosh, do not mention there was not necessarily anything 1995) was born in Russia, where them in their halachic works. Another that prevented the non-Jews from he learned Torah clandestinely, is to say that it only is binding when changing their mind, which would escaping to become a talmid of the nations keep their related oath of return the status of the Three Oaths Rav A.Y. Kook z.t.l. He went on not enslaving the Jewish people too to its place. We will now discuss when to be the rav of Kfar Haroeh, a harshly, but when peaceful survival this precarious situation ended. dayan in the Supreme Rabbinical became untenable in the exile, the 5 Court in Jerusalem, Rosh Yeshiva Jews may take refuge in Eretz Yisrael. In Eretz Hemdah, Rav Yisraeli posits that the events of 5708 (1947-8) at Merkaz Harav, and founder of The most widespread and arguably prevent the non-Jewish nations from the Eretz Hemdah Kollel (where most satisfying answer is that, as Rashi rescinding their permission to Bnei this writer learned under him). He says, the oath only precludes acting by Yisrael to possess Eretz Yisrael as was a prolific writer and important force, in other words, against the will a nation. On November 29, 1947 leader, including on matters of the of the relevant nation(s). In the case the United Nations, upon British Torah in a renewed Jewish State. of Modern Zionism, the settlement request to decide the matter, agreed of years, occurred specifically on the of Jews was (at least for the most to the establishment of a Jewish state first Yom Ha’atzmaut. The acting part) done with the agreement of the in parts of “Palestine.” Rav Yisraeli on the permission given by nations possessors of the Land. In the early views this permission as applying stages, that was the Ottoman Empire. to take control of Eretz Yisrael to us vis-à-vis national control of the concretized our rights to it and caused Later on, it was with the British, who Land (not merely permission for the Three Oaths to no longer be a conquered the country during World people to settle in Eretz Yisrael). concern. This, Rav Yisraeli argued, War I, along with other World War As such, finalizing our rights to the made the 5th of Iyar a day that is I allies and with the world bodies Land needed to be done in the same worthy of celebration, irrespective of (League of Nations, United Nations), way that one finalizes any agreement if and when miraculous events took under whose auspices the British held regarding property—by means of an their Mandate of Palestine. Those place on the battlefield. act of kinyan (acquisition). One of the who subscribe to this view, including forms of kinyan for land is chazaka This basic construct, of combining Rav Shaul Yisraeli, posit that the (acting toward the land as an owner the permission of the nations with opinions of the majority of residents would).6 Regarding the right to create the chazaka the Jewish people made of Eretz Yisrael and of the neighboring a sovereign state, the way to perform on Eretz Yisrael in its aftermath, countries—Arabs who were hostile to chazaka was by declaring sovereignty. arises again in the writings of Rav Zionism—were not relevant because This was done by the leaders of the Shaul Yisraeli in another context.7 they did not enjoy any type of political yishuv on that memorable and joyous Rav Ovadia Yosef posited that one of .3 or military control over Eretz Yisrael (if tense) 5th of Iyar 5708. Thus, posits the reasons why an agreement that One of the interesting and arguably Rav Yisraeli, our full rights to Eretz includes Israeli ceding to the Arabs unique elements of Rav Yisraeli’s Yisrael, for the first time in thousands significant land in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza is theoretically proper is that 17 Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary • The Benjamin and Rose Berger CJF Torah To-Go Series • Yom Haatzmaut 5777 holding on to these sections of the was in 1948 and 1967), then the of the daughters of Jerusalem … Now, Land at such a time is in contradiction State and its citizens are expected to however, [we have experienced] Divine to the Three Oaths. These areas, after protect themselves. If in the context providence in the gathering of the all, were conquered by Israel and held of a defensive war, the borders of the League of Nations in San Remo and against the stated policy of virtually State are expanded, neither the Three a pronouncement was made that the every country and international Oaths nor any other halachic mandate Land of Israel will belong to the Jewish organization.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE APOCALYPTIC WAR AGAINST GOG of MAGOG. MARTIN BUBER VERSUS MEIR KAHANE Por: Rico Sneller
    EL CONFLICTO PALESTINO-ISRAELI: SOLUCIONES Y DERIVAS Profesor David Noel Ramírez Padilla Rector del Tecnológico de Monterrey Lic. Héctor Núñez de Cáceres Rector de la Zona Occidente Ing. Salvador Coutiño Audiffred Dr. Ricardo Romero Gerbaud Director General del Campus Querétaro Dirección Dr. Ricardo Romero Gerbaud Mtro. José Manuel Velázquez Hurtado Director de Profesional y Graduados en María José Juárez Becerra Administración y Ciencias Sociales Edición Mtra. Angélica Camacho Aranda Natalia Fernández, Alicia Hernández, Rodrigo Directora del Departamento de Relaciones Pesce Internacionales y Formación Humanística Asistentes de Edición Mtro. Kacper Przyborowski Director de la Licenciatura en Relaciones Internacionales Dr. Tomás Pérez Vejo Dra. Marisol Reyes Soto Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia INAH University of Queens, Ireland Dra. Avital Bloch Dr. Tamir Bar-On Universidad de Colima Tecnológico de Monterrey Dra. Marie-Joelle Zahar Université de Montréal Dra. Claudia Barona Castañeda Universidad de Las Américas Puebla Dr. Thomas Wolfe University of Minnesota, Twin-Cities Dr. Janusz Mucha AGH, Cracovia GRUPO FORUM Retos Internacionales, ISSN: 2007-8390. Año 5, No. 11, Agosto-Diciembre 2014, publicación semestral. Editada por el Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, Campus Querétaro, a través de la División de Administración y Ciencias Sociales, bajo la dirección del Departamento deRelaciones Internacionales y Humanidades, domicilio Av. Eugenio Garza Sada No. 2501, Col. Tecnológico, C.P. 64849, Monterrey, N.L. Editor responsable: Dr. Ricardo Romero Gerbaud. Datos de contacto: [email protected], http://retosinternacionales.com, teléfono y fax: 52 (442) 238 32 34. Impresa por FORUM arte y comunicación S.A. de C.V., domicilio Av. del 57, número 12, Colonia Centro, C.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Zionism - a Successor to Rabbinical Judaism?
    Zionism - A Successor to Rabbinical Judaism? By Gol Kalev Outline I) Introduction II) Historical Background -Judaism to Zionism -Zionism as a Successor to Rabbinical Judaism? Why It Has Not Happened So Far: -Israel-Related Hurdles -America-Related Hurdles III) Transformation of Judaism: Why Now Might Be a Ripe Time: -Changing Circumstances in Israel -New Threats (Post-Zionism) -Enablers of Jewish Transformation -Changing Circumstances in America -New Threats (End of Jewish Glues, Israel-Bashing, Dispersal of Jewish Capital) -Enablers of Jewish Transformation IV) Judaism 3.0 2 INTRODUCTION “Palestine for the Jews!” That was the headline of The London Times on November 9, 1917, the week after the British government issued the Balfour Declaration. A mere 30 years later, the headline turned into reality with the establishment of the State of Israel, homeland of the Jewish People. The return of the Jews to their ancestral homeland has driven Rabbinical Judaism, the form of Judaism practiced for the last 1900 years, to a unique challenge. After all, Rabbinical Judaism’s formation coincided with the Jews’ exit to the Diaspora, and to a large extent was developed to accommodate the state of exile. Much of its core is based on the yearning for the return to Israel. The propensity of its rituals, prayers and customs are centered on the Land of Israel, from having synagogues face Jerusalem to reciting a prayer for return three times a day. A question arose: Now that the Jews are allowed to return to the Land of Israel, how will Judaism evolve? During the 20th century, the Jewish people re-domiciled and concentrated in two core centers: Israel and the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Daat Torah (PDF)
    Daat Torah Rabbi Alfred Cohen Daat Torah is a concept of supreme importance whose specific parameters remain elusive. Loosely explained, it refers to an ideology which teaches that the advice given by great Torah scholars must be followed by Jews committed to Torah observance, inasmuch as these opinions are imbued with Torah insights.1 Although the term Daat Torah is frequently invoked to buttress a given opinion or position, it is difficult to find agreement on what is actually included in the phrase. And although quite a few articles have been written about it, both pro and con, many appear to be remarkably lacking in objectivity and lax in their approach to the truth. Often they are based on secondary source and feature inflamma- tory language or an unflatttering tone; they are polemics rather than scholarship, with faulty conclusions arising from failure to check into what really was said or written by the great sages of earlier generations.2 1. Among those who have tackled the topic, see Lawrence Kaplan ("Daas Torah: A Modern Conception of Rabbinic Authority", pp. 1-60), in Rabbinic Authority and Personal Autonomy, published by Jason Aronson, Inc., as part of the Orthodox Forum series which also cites numerous other sources in its footnotes; Rabbi Berel Wein, writing in the Jewish Observer, October 1994; Rabbi Avi Shafran, writing in the Jewish Observer, Dec. 1986, p.12; Jewish Observer, December 1977; Techumin VIII and XI. 2. As an example of the opinion that there either is no such thing now as Daat Torah which Jews committed to Torah are obliged to heed or, even if there is, that it has a very limited authority, see the long essay by Lawrence Kaplan in Rabbinic Authority and Personal Autonomy, cited in the previous footnote.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tribu1e 10 Eslller, Mv Panner in Torah
    gudath Israel of America's voice in kind of informed discussion and debate the halls of courts and the corri­ that leads to concrete action. dors of Congress - indeed every­ A But the convention is also a major where it exercises its shtadlonus on yardstick by which Agudath Israel's behalf of the Kial - is heard more loudly strength as a movement is measured. and clearly when there is widespread recognition of the vast numbers of peo­ So make this the year you ple who support the organization and attend an Agm:fah conventicm. share its ideals. Resente today An Agudah convention provides a forum Because your presence sends a for benefiting from the insights and powerfo! - and ultimately for choice aa:ommodotions hadracha of our leaders and fosters the empowering - message. call 111-m-nao is pleased to announce the release of the newest volume of the TlHllE RJENNlERT JED>JITJION ~7~r> lEN<ClY<ClUO>lPElOl l[}\ ~ ·.:~.~HDS. 1CA\J~YA<Gr M(][1CZ\V<Q . .:. : ;······~.·····················.-~:·:····.)·\.~~····· ~s of thousands we~ed.(>lig~!~d~ith the best-selling mi:i:m niw:.r c .THE :r~~··q<:>Jy(MANDMENTS, the inaugural volume of theEntzfl(lj)('dia (Mitzvoth 25-38). Now join us aswestartfromthebeginning. The En~yclop~dia provides yau with • , • A panciramicviewofthe entire Torah .Laws, cust9ms and details about each Mitzvah The pririlafy reasons and insights for each Mitzvah. tteas.. ury.· of Mid. ra. shim and stories from Cha. zal... and m.uc.h.. n\ ''"'''''' The Encyclopedia of the Taryag Mitzvoth The Taryag Legacy Foundation is a family treasure that is guaranteed to wishes to thank enrich, inspire, and elevate every Jewish home.
    [Show full text]
  • Holy War in Modern Judaism? "Mitzvah War" and the Problem of the "Three Vows" Author(S): Reuven Firestone Source: Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Vol
    Holy War in Modern Judaism? "Mitzvah War" and the Problem of the "Three Vows" Author(s): Reuven Firestone Source: Journal of the American Academy of Religion, Vol. 74, No. 4 (Dec., 2006), pp. 954- 982 Published by: Oxford University Press Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4139958 Accessed: 18-08-2018 15:51 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms Oxford University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of the American Academy of Religion This content downloaded from 128.95.104.66 on Sat, 18 Aug 2018 15:51:16 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms Holy War in Modern Judaism? "Mitzvah War" and the Problem of the "Three Vows" Reuven Firestone "Holy war," sanctioned or even commanded by God, is a common and recurring theme in the Hebrew Bible. Rabbinic Judaism largely avoided discussion of holy war for the simple reason that it became dangerous and self-destructive. The failed "holy wars" of the Great Revolt and the Bar Kokhba Rebellion eliminated enthusiasm for it among the survivors engaged in reconstructing Judaism from ancient biblical religion. The rabbis therefore built a fence around the notion through two basic strat- egies: to define and categorize biblical wars so that they became virtually unthinkable in their contemporary world and to construct a divine con- tract between God, the Jews, and the world of the Gentiles that would establish an equilibrium preserving the Jews from overwhelming Gentile wrath by preventing Jewish actions that could result in war.
    [Show full text]
  • The 5 Towns Jewish Times
    $1.00 WWW.5TJT.COM VOL. 7 NO. 5 12 CHESHVAN 5767 lk lk ,arp NOVEMBER 3, 2006 INSIDE FROM THE EDITOR’S DESK THE LIGHT AT THE Thanks, Teeth BY LARRY GORDON 26 END OF THE TUNNEL Hannah Reich Berman Talking With Gourmet Glatt MindBiz Esther Mann, LMSW 30 Dean Skelos vs. The Vaad Kashrus Square Rooted Rabbi Yair Hoffman 52 State Senator Dean Skelos At this point, most readers are knows the Five Towns, Long aware that last Friday afternoon Aliyah Chronicle Island, and most of New York the Vaad HaKashrus of the Five Shmuel Katz 55 State better than just about Towns withdrew its certification anyone. Next week he is once of Gourmet Glatt Food IDF Death In Gaza again up for reelection, this Emporium in Cedarhurst. The Amos Harel 76 time against a dynamic Demo- letter delivered to Gourmet Glatt cratic challenger, Lawrence (see page 12) informs the owners resident Odelia Goldberg. of Gourmet Glatt that because of While the polls are pre- a violation of a clause in their Continued on Page 7 Continued on Page 10 WITHOUT HAPPINESS, WE’RE ALL ‘AT RISK’ PhotosByIraThomasCreations Mosholu Rebbe will be in the Five Towns next week. BY RABBI underlying problems, but See Page 50 Top: Rabbi Pesach Lerner delivering the daf shiur aboard the 7:49 a.m. SHAYA COHEN merely devastating symptoms Far Rockaway train to Penn Station. Standing next to him is Rabbi Eliezer of an inherent lack of happi- Cohen; seated are (aisle) Aryeh Markovich and (center) Rabbi Shmuel You’ve seen those aimless, ness—the common denomi- Bloom.
    [Show full text]
  • An Old/New Anti-Semitism
    בס“ד Parshat Vayera 15 Cheshvan, 5778/November 4, 2017 Vol. 9 Num. 9 This week’s Toronto Torah is dedicated by Rabbi Charles and Lori Grysman Bernie Goldstein z”l ,דב בן גרשון ,for the shloshim of Lori’s father An Old/New Anti-Semitism Rabbi Mordechai Torczyner In 2004, then-MK Natan Sharansky (26:18-19), they suggested that Yitzchak was not a true heir to described a “New Anti-Semitism”: anti- Yishmael shot arrows at his baby Avraham. She responded by insisting Jewish activism which disguises itself brother, pretending that it was only a that Yishmael be evicted; onlookers as political opposition to the State of joke. Since Yishmael posed a mortal would expect that Avraham would not Israel. A central characteristic of this threat to his brother, Sarah ordered him evict his biological child in order to school is delegitimization – claiming evicted. (Bereishit Rabbah ibid.) protect the reputation of his stepchild. that we lack the right to our Israeli homeland. However, Rabbi Naftali Zvi Finally, our Sages offered a third Per Netziv, Sarah exiled Yishmael Yehuda Berlin (“Netziv”) contended approach, relying not so much on the because he threatened the identity of more than a century ago that word mitzachek as on Sarah’s Yitzchak, and his heirs, as members of delegitimization is not new. Rather, it statement, “This maid’s son will not Avraham’s family. This was the original dates back to the first biblical enemy inherit with my son, with case of “New Anti-Semitism”, an attempt of the Jewish people: Yishmael. Yitzchak.” (Bereishit 21:10) Yishmael to delegitimize the Jews’ claim to the laughed at Yitzchak, saying, “Fools! I mantle of our ancestors.
    [Show full text]
  • Messianic Religious Zionism by Aviezer Ravitzky 25/12/07 15:51
    "The Revealed End": Messianic Religious Zionism by Aviezer Ravitzky 25/12/07 15:51 "The Revealed End": Messianic Religious Zionism by Aviezer Ravitzky Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook and his son Zvi Yehudah Kook from Torat Eretz Yisrael: The Teachings of HaRav Tzvi Yehuda HaCohen Kook by Rabbi Shlomo Chaim HaCohen Aviner, translated by Tzvi Fishman, http://www.geocities.com/alabasters_archive/revealed_end.html Page 1 sur 94 "The Revealed End": Messianic Religious Zionism by Aviezer Ravitzky 25/12/07 15:51 by Rabbi Shlomo Chaim HaCohen Aviner, translated by Tzvi Fishman, Torat Eretz Yisrael Publications, Jerusalem, 1991 from the book Messianism, Zionism, and Jewish Religious Radicalism 1996 pages 79-144 Translated by Michael Swirsky and Jonathan Chipman University of Chicago Press Originally published as Kets ha-meguleh u-medinat ha-Yehudim. Am Oved Publishers, Tel Aviv, 1993 Also available from Amazon.com The Table of Contents can be found at the end of this document and also by clicking the section headings. "A Messianic Reality" How is it that the movement for concrete redemption in our time, including the settlement and conquest of the Land [of Israel] and the abandonment and abolition of exilic existence, did not originate with the religious? How is it that some religious spokesmen even withheld their support for Zionism and the movement for redemption? . They failed to recognize that it was not that we mortals were forcing the End, but rather that the Master of the House, the Lord of the http://www.geocities.com/alabasters_archive/revealed_end.html
    [Show full text]
  • Yeshiva University • Yom Ha'atzmaut To-Go • Iyar 5770
    1 YESHIVA UNIVERSITY • YOM HA’ATZMAUT TO-GO • IYAR 5770 Iyar 5770 Dear Friends, may serve to enhance your ספר It is my sincere hope that the Torah found in this virtual .(study) לימוד holiday) and your) יום טוב We have designed this project not only for the individual, studying alone, but perhaps even a pair studying together) that wish to work through the study matter) חברותא more for a together, or a group engaged in facilitated study. להגדיל תורה ,With this material, we invite you to join our Beit Midrash, wherever you may be to enjoy the splendor of Torah) and to engage in discussing issues that touch on a) ולהאדירה most contemporary matter, and are rooted in the timeless arguments of our great sages from throughout the generations. Bivracha, Rabbi Kenneth Brander Dean, Yeshiva University Center for the Jewish Future RICHARD M JOEL, President, Yeshiva University RABBI KENNETH BRANDER, David Mitzner Dean, Center for the Jewish Future RABBI ROBERT SHUR, General Editor RABBI MICHAEL DUBITSKY, Editor Copyright © 2010 All rights reserved by Yeshiva University Yeshiva University Center for the Jewish Future 500 West 185th Street, Suite 413, New York, NY 10033 [email protected] • 212.960.5400 x 5313 2 YESHIVA UNIVERSITY • YOM HA’ATZMAUT TO-GO • IYAR 5770 Table of Contents Yom Haatzmaut 2010/5770 Our Dependence Upon Israel's Independence Rabbi Norman Lamm. Page 4 The Religious Significance of Israel Rabbi Yosef Blau . Page 9 Maintaining a Connection to the Land of Israel from the Diaspora Rabbi Joshua Flug . Page 12 Establishing Yom Haatzmaut as a Yom Tov Rabbi Eli Ozarowski .
    [Show full text]
  • The-Balfour-Declaration-Lookstein-Center.Pdf
    The Balfour Declaration - November 2, 1917 Celebrating 100 Years There are those who believe that the Balfour Declaration was the most magnanimous (generous) gesture by an imperial nation. Others believe it was the biggest error of judgment that a world power could make. In this unit, we will discover: What was the Balfour Declaration Why the Balfour Declaration was so important How the Balfour Declaration is relevant today 1. Which of the following Declarations have you heard of? a) The United States Declaration of Independence, 1776 b) The Irish Declaration of Independence, 1917 c) The Balfour Declaration, 1917 d) The Israeli Declaration of Independence, 1948 e) The Austrian Declaration of Neutrality, 1955 What was the Balfour Declaration? The Balfour Declaration was a letter written in the name of the British government, by Lord Arthur James Balfour, Britain’s Foreign Secretary, to the leaders of the Zionist Federation. 2. Read the letter: Dear Lord Rothschild, I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty’s Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet. “His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.” I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.
    [Show full text]
  • Rabbi Shlomo Goren and the Military Ethic of the Israel Defense Forces
    Divine Spirit and Physical Power: Rabbi Shlomo Goren and the Military Ethic of the Israel Defense Forces Arye Edrei* The renewal of Jewish sovereignty in 1948 created a grave challenge to Jewish tradition. As a system that was constructed in exile for a non-sovereign society, Jewish law was lacking "laws of state." The legitimacy of military action and the distinction between just and unjust wars are prime examples of fundamental issues that Jews did not have to confront for a very long period of time. This article examines contemporary Jewish legal responses to the challenges posed by the creation of the Israeli military. It focuses on the efforts of Rabbi Shlomo Goren, the first Chief Rabbi of the Israel Defense Forces, to create a modern corpus of Jewish law and ethics relating to war and the military. The Diaspora-based rabbinic literature seemed to oppose the use of force, reinterpreting Biblical references to military heroism as allegorical expressions of valor in the study of Torah. In an attempt to create an approach that legitimized the use of force while, at the same time, maintaining the rabbinic moral compunction regarding reliance on force, Rabbi Goren’s innovative corpus integrated Biblical and rabbinic sources, as well as pre-rabbinic apocryphal and historical sources. His writings on the subject are studied on a historical level, trying to uncover the various personalities and ideological positions to which he reacted. Rabbi Goren’s approach is examined through an * Faculty of Law, Tel Aviv University. The author wishes to thank Mr. B. Zalmanovitz for his assistance and the Cegla Center for Interdisciplinary Research of the Law at Tel Aviv University for its support.
    [Show full text]
  • Judaicchallengestothelegitimac
    DE GRUYTER Global Jurist. 2018; 20180015 Yakov Rabkin1 Judaic Challenges to the Legitimacy of Israel 1 Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada, E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Legitimacy implies the existence of a framework within which it is assessed. The framework chosen for this paper is the religion of Judaism. This is, of course, contingent on the assumption that the state of Israel is related to Judaism, whatever its stream. Both the founding fathers of Zionism and their detractors emphasized the discontinuity and the revolutionary nature of the new political movement in Jewish history. Traditional leaders of Judaism almost unanimously condemned Zionism as an alien and perfidious import. They refused it all legitimacy. However, the policy of centrality of Israel exported around the world by Israeli educators for several decades has borne fruit. Many Jews find it difficult to separate Zionism from the Jewish identity asit has been taught to them. Their identity is often centred on political support for the State of Israel, and they see advocacy for Israel — a special course in the curriculum of many private Jewish schools — as a key part of being Jewish. The question of Israel divides the Jews more than any other. In view of the vast diversity of views, Judaic legitimacy of Israel depends of the kind of Judaism in question. In terms of traditional Judaic scholarship, espoused by most Haredim, Zionism and the state that embodies it are at best irrelevant to their Judaism. Yet, more modernized Jewish communities embrace the centrality of Israel with a lot of emotion. They cannot imagine a Judaism without Israel.
    [Show full text]