Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 105 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 105 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 105 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 144 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, MAY 4, 1998 No. 53 House of Representatives The House met at 2 p.m. and was Mr. HORN led the Pledge of Alle- bill to the Committee on Government called to order by the Speaker pro tem- giance as follows: Reform and Oversight. pore (Mr. PEASE). I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is the f United States of America, and to the Repub- gentlewoman opposed to the Senate lic for which it stands, one nation under God, bill? DESIGNATION OF THE SPEAKER indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Ms. NORTON. Yes, Madam Speaker. PRO TEMPORE f The SPEAKER pro tempore. The The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE Clerk will report the motion to com- fore the House the following commu- mit. A message from the Senate by Mr. nication from the Speaker: The Clerk read as follows: Lundregan, one of its clerks, an- WASHINGTON, DC, nounced that the Senate had passed a Ms. NORTON moves to commit the bill S. May 4, 1998. 1502 to the Committee on Government Re- bill of the following title, in which con- I hereby designate the Honorable EDWARD form and Oversight. currence of the House is requested: A. PEASE to act as Speaker pro tempore on The SPEAKER pro tempore. The mo- S. 1900. An act to establish a commission this day. tion is not debatable. NEWT GINGRICH, to examine issues pertaining to the disposi- Speaker of the House of Representatives. tion of Holocaust-era assets in the United Without objection, the previous ques- tion is ordered on the motion to com- f States before, during, and after World War II, and to make recommendations to the mit. PRAYER President on further action, and for other There was no objection. purposes. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The The Chaplain, Rev. James David f question is on the motion to commit. Ford, D.D., offered the following pray- The question was taken; and the er: ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER Speaker pro tempore announced that As the morning brings light into a PRO TEMPORE the noes appeared to have it. dark world, so may your gifts of love, The SPEAKER pro tempore. The RECORDED VOTE O God, bring light and blessing to all Chair desires to announce that pursu- people. With the frustrations that ant to clause 4 of rule I, the Speaker Ms. NORTON. Madam Speaker, I de- mark anyone's day we are grateful that signed the following enrolled bill on mand a recorded vote. you illumine our days and comfort our Thursday, April 30, 1998: A recorded vote was ordered. souls. Whether we are living on the H.R. 3579, making emergency supple- The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- mountain top of joyful experience or mental appropriations for the fiscal ant to the provisions of clause 5 of rule walking through the valley of the shad- year ending September 30, 1998, and for XV, the Chair announces that she will ow of death, we know your presence other purposes. reduce to a minimum of 5 minutes the period of time within which a vote by can lead us and give us peace. In your f name we pray. Amen. electronic device, if ordered, will be CORRECTION TO THE CONGRES- taken on the question of passage of the f SIONAL RECORD OF THURSDAY, Senate bill. THE JOURNAL APRIL 30, 1998, PAGES H2669, H2670 The vote was taken by electronic de- The SPEAKER pro tempore. The AND H2671, RECORDED VOTE vice, and there wereÐayes 198, noes 224, Chair has examined the Journal of the NUMBERED 118, MOTION TO COM- not voting 11, as follows: last day's proceedings and announces MIT OFFERED BY MS. NORTON; [Roll No. 118] to the House his approval thereof. AND RECORDED VOTE NUM- AYESÐ198 BERED 119, PASSAGE OF THE Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Jour- Abercrombie Berry Brown (OH) nal stands approved. BILL S. 1502, THE DISTRICT OF Ackerman Bishop Capps COLUMBIA STUDENT OPPOR- Allen Blagojevich Cardin f TUNITY SCHOLARSHIP ACT OF Andrews Blumenauer Carson Baesler Bonior Clay PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1997 Baldacci Borski Clayton Barcia Boswell Clement The SPEAKER pro tempore. Will the Barrett (WI) Boucher Clyburn gentleman from California (Mr. HORN) MOTION TO COMMIT OFFERED BY MS. NORTON Becerra Boyd Condit come forward and lead the House in the Ms. NORTON. Madam Speaker, I Bentsen Brown (CA) Conyers Pledge of Allegiance. offer a motion to commit the Senate Berman Brown (FL) Costello b This symbol represents the time of day during the House proceedings, e.g., b 1407 is 2:07 p.m. Matter set in this typeface indicates words inserted or appended, rather than spoken, by a Member of the House on the floor. H2739 H2740 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð HOUSE May 4, 1998 Coyne Kildee Pomeroy Lazio Petri Skeen Condit Hunter Radanovich Cramer Kilpatrick Poshard Leach Pickering Smith (NJ) Cook Hyde Redmond Cummings Kind (WI) Price (NC) Lewis (CA) Pickett Smith (OR) Cooksey Inglis Regula Danner Kleczka Rahall Lewis (KY) Pitts Smith (TX) Cox Istook Riggs Davis (FL) Klink Ramstad Linder Pombo Smith, Linda Crane Jenkins Riley Davis (IL) Kucinich Rangel Livingston Porter Snowbarger Cubin Johnson, Sam Rogan DeFazio LaFalce Reyes LoBiondo Portman Solomon Cunningham Jones Rogers DeGette Lampson Rivers Lucas Pryce (OH) Souder Davis (VA) Kasich Rohrabacher Delahunt Lantos Rodriguez Manzullo Quinn Spence Deal Kelly Ros-Lehtinen DeLauro Lee Roemer McCollum Radanovich Stearns DeLay Kim Royce Deutsch Levin Rothman McCrery Redmond Stump Diaz-Balart King (NY) Ryun Dicks Lewis (GA) Roybal-Allard McDade Regula Sununu Dickey Kingston Salmon Dingell Lipinski Rush McInnis Riggs Talent Doolittle Klug Sanford Doggett Lofgren Sabo McIntosh Riley Tauzin Dreier Knollenberg Saxton Dooley Lowey Sanchez McKeon Rogan Taylor (MS) Duncan Kolbe Scarborough Doyle Luther Sanders Metcalf Rogers Taylor (NC) Dunn LaHood Schaefer, Dan Edwards Maloney (CT) Sawyer Mica Rohrabacher Thomas Ehlers Largent Schaffer, Bob Engel Maloney (NY) Schumer Miller (FL) Ros-Lehtinen Thornberry Ehrlich Latham Sensenbrenner Eshoo Manton Scott Moran (KS) Roukema Thune Emerson LaTourette Sessions Etheridge Markey Serrano Moran (VA) Royce Tiahrt Ensign Lazio Shadegg Evans Martinez Sherman Myrick Ryun Upton Everett Lewis (CA) Shaw Farr Mascara Sisisky Nethercutt Salmon Walsh Ewing Lewis (KY) Shays Fattah Matsui Skaggs Neumann Sanford Wamp Foley Linder Shimkus Fazio McCarthy (MO) Skelton Ney Saxton Watkins Forbes Lipinski Shuster Filner McCarthy (NY) Slaughter Northup Scarborough Watts (OK) Fossella Livingston Skeen Ford McDermott Smith, Adam Norwood Schaefer, Dan Weldon (FL) Fowler Lucas Smith (NJ) Frank (MA) McGovern Snyder Nussle Schaffer, Bob Weldon (PA) Fox Manzullo Smith (OR) Frost McHale Spratt Oxley Sensenbrenner Weller Franks (NJ) McCollum Smith (TX) Furse McIntyre Stabenow Packard Sessions White Frelinghuysen McCrery Smith, Linda Gejdenson McKinney Stark Pappas Shadegg Whitfield Gallegly McDade Snowbarger Gephardt McNulty Stenholm Paul Shaw Wicker Ganske McInnis Solomon Gordon Meehan Stokes Paxon Shays Wolf Gekas McIntosh Souder Green Meeks (NY) Strickland Pease Shimkus Young (FL) Gibbons McKeon Spence Gutierrez Menendez Stupak Peterson (PA) Shuster Gilchrest Metcalf Stearns Hall (OH) Millender- Tanner Gillmor Mica Stump Hamilton McDonald Tauscher NOT VOTINGÐ11 Gilman Miller (FL) Sununu Harman Miller (CA) Thompson Bateman Kennelly Sandlin Gingrich Moran (KS) Talent Hastings (FL) Minge Thurman Bunning McHugh Smith (MI) Goode Moran (VA) Tauzin Hefner Mink Tierney Dixon Meek (FL) Young (AK) Goodlatte Myrick Taylor (MS) Hilliard Moakley Torres Gonzalez Parker Goodling Nethercutt Taylor (NC) Hinchey Mollohan Towns Goss Neumann Thomas Hinojosa Morella Traficant Graham Ney Thornberry Holden Murtha Turner b 1453 Granger Northup Thune Hooley Nadler Velazquez The Clerk announced the following Greenwood Norwood Tiahrt Hoyer Neal Vento Gutknecht Nussle Upton Jackson (IL) Oberstar Visclosky pairs: Hansen Oxley Walsh Jackson-Lee Obey Waters On this vote: Hastert Packard Wamp Watt (NC) Hastings (WA) Pappas Watkins (TX) Olver Mrs. Kennelly of Connecticut for, with Mr. Jefferson Ortiz Waxman Hayworth Paxon Watts (OK) John Owens Wexler Young of Arkansas against. Hefley Pease Weldon (FL) Johnson (WI) Pallone Weygand Mrs. Meek of Florida for, with Mr. Smith Herger Peterson (PA) Weldon (PA) Johnson, E. B. Pascrell Wise of Michigan against. Hill Petri Weller Kanjorski Pastor Woolsey Mrs. CHENOWETH changed her vote Hilleary Pickering White Kaptur Payne Wynn Hobson Pitts Whitfield Kennedy (MA) Pelosi Yates from ``aye'' to ``no.'' Hoekstra Pombo Wicker Kennedy (RI) Peterson (MN) Mr. VENTO and Mr. ANDREWS Horn Porter Wolf changed their vote from ``no'' to ``aye.'' Hostettler Portman Young (FL) NOESÐ224 Houghton Pryce (OH) So the motion to commit was re- Hulshof Quinn Aderholt Cooksey Goss jected. Archer Cox Graham NOESÐ206 Armey Crane The result of the vote was announced Granger Abercrombie DeFazio Holden Bachus Crapo as above recorded. Greenwood Ackerman DeGette Hooley Baker Cubin Gutknecht The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mrs. Allen Delahunt Hoyer Ballenger Cunningham Hall (TX) EMERSON). The question is on the pas- Andrews DeLauro Hutchinson Barr Davis (VA) Hansen Baesler Deutsch Jackson (IL) Barrett (NE) Deal sage of the Senate bill. Hastert Baldacci Dicks Jackson-Lee Bartlett DeLay Hastings (WA) The question was taken; and the Barcia Dingell (TX) Barton Diaz-Balart Hayworth Speaker pro tempore announced that Barrett (WI) Doggett Jefferson Bass Dickey Hefley Becerra Dooley John Bereuter Doolittle the ayes appeared to have it. Herger Bentsen Doyle Johnson (CT) Bilbray Dreier RECORDED VOTE Hill Berman Edwards Johnson (WI) Bilirakis Duncan Hilleary Ms. NORTON. Madam Speaker, I de- Berry Engel Johnson, E. B. Bliley Dunn Hobson Bishop English Kanjorski Blunt Ehlers mand a recorded vote. Hoekstra Blagojevich Eshoo Kaptur Boehlert Ehrlich Horn A recorded vote was ordered. Blumenauer Etheridge Kennedy (MA) Boehner Emerson Hostettler The SPEAKER pro tempore. This Boehlert Evans Kennedy (RI) Bonilla English Houghton Bonior Farr Kildee Bono Ensign will be a 5-minute vote.
Recommended publications
  • Instructions for Form 6251 7
    Revised Proof Ok to Print Rtext sent (date) Requested (init. & date) (init. & date) Page 1 of 8 of Instructions for Form 6251 7 The type and rule above prints on all proofs including departmental reproduction proofs. MUST be removed before printing. Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Instructions for Form 6251 Alternative Minimum Tax—Individuals (Section references are to the Internal Revenue Code unless otherwise noted.) General Instructions cases, line 20). The forms used to figure Credit For Prior Year these credits have information on the tentative minimum tax limit. Minimum Tax Paperwork Reduction Act Get Form 8801, Credit For Prior Year Notice Additional Information Minimum Tax—Individuals and We ask for the information on this form Fiduciaries, if you paid AMT for 1991, or For more details, get Pub. 909, if you had a minimum tax credit to carry out the Internal Revenue laws of Alternative Minimum Tax for Individuals. the United States. You are required to carryforward on line 26 of your 1991 give us the information. We need it to Form 8801. If you pay AMT for 1992, ensure that you are complying with Recordkeeping you may be able to take a credit on your these laws and to allow us to figure and For AMT purposes, certain items of 1993 Form 8801. collect the right amount of tax. income, deductions, etc., receive The time needed to complete and file different tax treatment than for regular Earned Income Credit this form will vary depending on tax purposes. Therefore, for the AMT If you have an earned income credit, you individual circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • Farm Income Tax Management and Reporting
    November 1991 A.E. Ext. 91-29 FARM INCOME TAX MANAGEMENT AND REPORTING Reference Manual [lONE WAy:1] IRS George L. Casler Stuart F. Smith • Department of Agricultural Economics New York State College of Agriculture and life Sciences A Statutory College of the State University Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-7801 It is the policy of Cornell University actively to support equality of educational and employment opportunity. No person shall be denied admission to any educational program or activity or be denied employment on the basis of any legally prohibited dis­ crimination involving, but not limited to, such factors as race, color, creed, religion, national or ethnic origin, sex, age or .. handicap. The University is committed to the maintenance of •. affirmative action programs which will assure the continuation of such equality of opportunity. 1991 TAX FORMS NEEDED BY NEW YORK FARMERS Federal Forms 1040 - U.S. Individual Income Tax Return (R) Schedule A & B - Itemized Deductions and Dividend and Interest Income (R) Schedule D - Capital Gains and Losses (and Reconciliation of Forms 1099-B) (R) Schedule E - Supplemental Income Schedule Schedule EIC - Earned Income Credit (New) Schedule F - Farm Income and Expenses. Line added for car and truck expo Schedule R - Credit for Elderly or the Disabled Schedule SE - Computation of Social Security Self-Employment Tax (R) 1040EZ - Income Tax Return for single filers with no dependents, income under $50,000, interest under $400, other limitations 1040A - Nonitemizers, under $50,000 taxable income, other limitations (R) 1040X - Amended U.S. Individual Income Tax Return 943 - Employer's Annual Tax Return for Agricultural Employees 1099 - Information returns to be filed by person who makes certain payments 1096 - Annual Summary and Transmittal of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 Chapter 2
    2003 Workbook Chapter 2: Small Business Issues 2 Issue 1 — Form 4797 ....................................................... 47 Issue 5 — Change of Accounting Method: IRC §481(a) Adjustments................................................ 98 Issue 2 — Construction Industry Issues ........................ 64 Issue 6 — New Business Credits................................... 110 Issue 3 — Purchase of a Business ................................... 80 Endnotes ......................................................................... 115 Issue 4 — Gain/Loss on Repossessed Property ............. 86 Corrections were made to this workbook through January of 2004. No subsequent modifications were made. ISSUE 1 — FORM 4797 INTRODUCTION When taxpayers sell assets used in their trade or business, they record the sale on Form 4797, Sales of Business Property. The form is designed to sort assets by type and to allow the recapture of depreciation and IRC §179 deduc- tions. Ultimately, the sales are sorted into capital gains and losses, and ordinary income. The capital gains and losses transfer to Schedule D, and the ordinary income from depreciation recapture is reported on line 14 of Form 1040. There are three advantages to reporting sales on Form 4797: 1. Normally, the gains avoid being taxed for self-employment tax. 2. A portion of the gain may be eligible for capital gain treatment and taxed at a lower rate. 3. Losses from the sale of the business assets are fully deductible as ordinary losses. Form 4797 is used to report the sale or exchange of: 1. Depreciable or amortizable property; 2. Oil, gas, geothermal, or other mineral property; and 3. IRC §126 property. Other transactions reported on Form 4797 include: 1. Involuntary conversion (from other than a casualty or theft) of property used in a trade or business, 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011–2012 Federal Income Tax Law Course Deskbook
    2011-2012 FEDERAL INCOME TAX LAW COURSE DESKBOOK November 2011 - January 2012 Deskbook Table of Contents Page Administrative Matters Faculty Biographies ............................................................................................................... ii Outlines and Materials Communicating with the IRS ............................................................................................. A-1 Professional Responsibility ................................................................................................. B-1 Casualty Tax Issues .............................................................................................................C-1 Deployment Tax Issues ....................................................................................................... D-1 Adjustments to Income ........................................................................................................ E-1 Tax Aspects of Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs) ............................................. F-1 Tax Aspects of Stocks & Mutual Funds ............................................................................. G-1 Tax Aspects of Real Property ............................................................................................. H-1 Tax Credits ........................................................................................................................... I-1 Sale of Rental Property ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2018 • Vol
    Texas Tax Lawyer A Tax Journal Fall 2018 • Vol. 46 • No. 1 www.texastaxsection.org TABLE OF CONTENTS FROM OUR LEADER: • The Chair's Message Catherine C. Scheid, Law Offices of Catherine C. Scheid SPECIAL ATTENTION • Apply to the 2019-2020 Leadership Academy • Congratulations to Judge Elizabeth Ann Copeland! ARTICLES: • Business Consolidations: Special Considerations under the Texas Unemployment Compensation Act Scott C. Thompson, Haynes and Boone, LLP • Estate planning subsequent to the enactment of tax reform Audrey Young, RSM US LLP Rebecca Warren, RSM US LLP Carol Warley, RSM US LLP • Divorce and Tax Randall B. Wilhite, Fullenweider Wilhite, P.C. • Recent Developments in Federal Income Taxation: “Recent Developments are just like ancient history, except they happened less long ago” First Wednesday Tax Update, August 1, 2018 Bruce A. McGovern, Professor of Law and Director, Tax Clinic, South Texas College of Law Houston • Recent Developments in Federal Income Taxation: “Recent Developments are just like ancient history, except they happened less long ago” First Wednesday Tax Update, September 5, 2018 1 Bruce A. McGovern, Professor of Law and Director, Tax Clinic, South Texas College of Law Houston • Recent Developments in Federal Income Taxation: “Recent Developments are just like ancient history, except they happened less long ago” First Wednesday Tax Update, October 3, 2018 Bruce A. McGovern, Professor of Law and Director, Tax Clinic, South Texas College of Law Houston PRACTITIONER’S CORNER: • Tax Reform: Now What? Eric Solomon, Ernst
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Gains Exception to the House's "General Utilities" Repeal: Further Indigestions from Overly Processed "Corn Products" John W
    College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications Faculty and Deans 1986 Capital Gains Exception to the House's "General Utilities" Repeal: Further Indigestions from Overly Processed "Corn Products" John W. Lee William & Mary Law School, [email protected] Repository Citation Lee, John W., "Capital Gains Exception to the House's "General Utilities" Repeal: Further Indigestions from Overly Processed "Corn Products"" (1986). Faculty Publications. 1382. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/1382 Copyright c 1986 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs CAPITAL GAINS EXCEPTION TO THE HOUSE'S GENERAL UTILITIES REPEAL: FURTHER - INDIGESTIONS FROM OVERLY PROCESSED CORN PRODUCTS by John W. Lee I. Introduction John w.. Lee is an Associate Pr'ofessor of LEIW at · Marshall-Wythe School of Law; College of William :Urider present law a purchasingco; poration u . s~ally and Mary.. Before a,ssurriing fiis profes,sorial post, effects a cost-basis acquisition of all or a substantial part Lee practiced tax law iii Richmond, Virginia, and of another corporation's assets.either by (a) a directasset published widely on many tax subjects in scholariy . purchase from Target corporation 1* in connection with its " journals, practical guides, and learned treatises. timely liquidation (to which existing section 337 applies Mr. Lee expresses his gratitude to the American at the corporate level and section 331 at the share.holder Institute on Federal Taxation for'the opportunity to ' level), or (b) a timely purchase of "contmi" (at least 80 .
    [Show full text]
  • Publication 541, Partnerships
    Userid: CPM Schema: tipx Leadpct: 100% Pt. size: 8 Draft Ok to Print AH XSL/XML Fileid: … ons/P541/202103/A/XML/Cycle04/source (Init. & Date) _______ Page 1 of 17 11:51 - 12-Mar-2021 The type and rule above prints on all proofs including departmental reproduction proofs. MUST be removed before printing. Publication 541 (Rev. March 2021) Contents Cat. No. 15071D Reminder .................... 1 Department of the Introduction .................. 1 Treasury Internal Partnerships Forming a Partnership ............ 2 Revenue Service Terminating a Partnership ......... 4 Exclusion From Partnership Rules .... 4 Partnership Return (Form 1065) ...... 4 Partnership Distributions .......... 4 Transactions Between Partnership and Partners ............... 7 Basis of Partner's Interest ......... 9 Disposition of Partner's Interest ..... 11 Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) ................ 13 Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (BBA) .................. 13 Index ..................... 17 Reminder Qualified Opportunity Investment. If you held a qualified investment in a qualified oppor- tunity fund (QOF) at any time during the year, you must file your return with Form 8997, Initial and Annual Statement of Qualified Opportunity Fund Investments, attached. See Form 8997 in- structions. Partnership representative. Under the cen- tralized partnership audit regime, partnerships are generally required to designate a partner- ship representative. See Role of Partnership Representative, later. Electing out of the centralized partnership audit regime. A partnership can elect out of the centralized partnership audit regime for a tax year if the partnership is an eligible partner- ship that year. See Electing Out of the Central- ized Partnership Audit Regime, later. Photographs of missing children. The Inter- nal Revenue Service is a proud partner with the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children® (NCMEC).
    [Show full text]
  • Taxpayers’ Needs
    In the Senate of the United States, May 7, 1998. Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representa- tives (H.R. 2676) entitled ``An Act to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restructure and reform the Internal Revenue Service, and for other purposes.'', do pass with the following AMENDMENT: Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert: 1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; AMENDMENT OF 1986 CODE; 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS. 3 (a) SHORT TITLE.ÐThis Act may be cited as the ``In- 4 ternal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 5 1998''. 6 (b) AMENDMENT OF 1986 CODE.ÐExcept as otherwise 7 expressly provided, whenever in this Act an amendment or 8 repeal is expressed in terms of an amendment to, or repeal 9 of, a section or other provision, the reference shall be consid- 2 1 ered to be made to a section or other provision of the Inter- 2 nal Revenue Code of 1986. 3 (c) TABLE OF CONTENTS.ÐThe table of contents for 4 this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; amendment of 1986 Code; table of contents. TITLE IÐREORGANIZATION OF STRUCTURE AND MANAGEMENT OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE Subtitle AÐReorganization of the Internal Revenue Service Sec. 1001. Reorganization of the Internal Revenue Service. Sec. 1002. IRS mission to focus on taxpayers' needs. Subtitle BÐExecutive Branch Governance and Senior Management Sec. 1101. Internal Revenue Service Oversight Board. Sec. 1102. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; other officials. Sec. 1103. Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration. Sec. 1104. Other personnel. Sec. 1105. Prohibition on executive branch influence over taxpayer audits and other investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • Nareit Letter
    July 1, 2019 Via: www.regulations.gov (IRS and REG-120186-18) CC: PA:LPD:PR (REG–120186–18) Room 5203 Internal Revenue Service P.O. Box 7604 Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044 Re: May 1, 2019 Proposed Qualified Opportunity Zone (QOZ) Regulations (the 2019 Proposed QOZ Regulations) Dear Sir or Madam: Nareit appreciates the opportunity to offer comments regarding the 2019 Proposed QOZ Regulations.1 Nareit2 is the worldwide representative voice for real estate investment trusts (REITs) and publicly traded real estate companies with an interest in U.S. real estate and capital markets. Nareit advocates for REIT- based real estate investment with policymakers and the global investment community. Executive Summary Last year’s tax reform legislation known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act3 added sections4 1400Z-1 and 2 to the Internal Revenue Code in order to encourage investment in low-income communities (qualified opportunity zones). On Oct. 29, 2018, the Treasury Department and IRS issued the first set of regulations under these provisions (2018 Proposed QOZ Regulations).5 Nareit submitted comments on Dec. 26, 2018 with respect to the 2018 Proposed QOZ Regulations. In those comments, Nareit commended the efforts of the Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) regarding the 2018 Proposed QOZ Regulations and recommended, among other things, that the final regulations should: 1) clearly define gain eligible for deferral as including any items of gross gain from the sale or exchange of property used in a trade or business (as defined in section 1231(b)); and, 2) begin the 180- 1 Investing in Qualified Opportunity Funds, 84 Fed.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxpayer's Opening Brief
    Case: 09-2353 Document: 18 Date Filed: 03/23/2010 Page: 1 RECORD NO. 09-2353 In The United States Court of Appeals For The Fourth Circuit HOME CONCRETE & SUPPLY, LLC; ROBERT L. PIERCE; STEPHEN R. CHANDLER; REBECCA R. CHANDLER; HOME OIL AND COAL COMPANY, INCORPORATED; SUSANNE D. PIERCE, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant – Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA AT NEW BERN BRIEF OF APPELLANTS Richard T. Rice Robert T. Numbers, II Charles M. Wiley WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC One West Fourth Street Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27101 (336) 721-3609 Counsel for Appellants THE LEX GROUP ♦ 1108 East Main Street ♦ Suite 1400 ♦ Richmond, VA 23219 (804) 644-4419 ♦ (800) 856-4419 ♦ Fax: (804) 644-3660 ♦ www.thelexgroup.com Case: 09-2353 Document: 18 Date Filed: 03/23/2010 Page: 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ................................................................................... iii STATEMENT OF SUBJECT MATTER AND APPELLATE JURISDICTION.........................................................................................................1 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES...............................................................................2 STATEMENT OF THE CASE..................................................................................2 STATEMENT OF THE FACTS ...............................................................................5 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ........................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Law Firms: Selected Partnership Tax Problems of Formation and Admission of New Partners Kerry L
    Nebraska Law Review Volume 59 | Issue 3 Article 5 1980 Law Firms: Selected Partnership Tax Problems of Formation and Admission of New Partners Kerry L. Kester University of Nebraska College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr Recommended Citation Kerry L. Kester, Law Firms: Selected Partnership Tax Problems of Formation and Admission of New Partners, 59 Neb. L. Rev. (1980) Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol59/iss3/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law, College of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Comment Law Firms: Selected Partnership Tax Problems of Formation and Admission of New Partners I. INTRODUCTION Many of the federal income tax aspects of transactions which are common among professional partnerships, and law partner- ships in particular, are not thoroughly analyzed by the taxpayers before they are effected. Often the tax ramifications are over- looked even after the transactions are completed. This comment will analyze the frequently unanticipated tax consequences which may arise from the formation of a law partnership and the admis- sion of new partners. Partnership tax literature is concerned primarily with capital intensive and tax shelter partnerships. Few works analyze problems peculiar to service partnerships. Law partnerships are not capital intensive as they do not depend upon capital for their income flow. The income producing elements in law partnerships are the services of the partners and their employees.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the House Committee on Ways and Means on Present Law and Suggestions for Reform Submitted to the Tax Reform Working Groups
    [JOINT COMMITTEE PRINT] REPORT TO THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS ON PRESENT LAW AND SUGGESTIONS FOR REFORM SUBMITTED TO THE TAX REFORM WORKING GROUPS Prepared by the Staff of the JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION May 6, 2013 U.S. Government Printing Office Washington: 2013 JCS-3-13 JOINT COMMITTEE ON TAXATION 113TH CONGRESS, 1ST SESSION ________ HOUSE SENATE Dave Camp, Michigan Max Baucus, Montana Chairman Vice Chairman Sam Johnson, Texas John D. Rockefeller IV, West Virginia Kevin Brady, Texas Ron Wyden, Oregon Sander M. Levin, Michigan Orrin G. Hatch, Utah Charles B. Rangel, New York Chuck Grassley, Iowa Thomas A. Barthold, Chief of Staff Bernard A. Schmitt, Deputy Chief of Staff CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 I. OVERVIEW OF PRESENT LAW FEDERAL TAX SYSTEM........................................ 2 A. Individual Income Tax.................................................................................................. 2 B. Corporate Income Tax ................................................................................................ 10 C. Estate, Gift and Generation-Skipping Transfer Taxes................................................ 14 D. Social Insurance Taxes ............................................................................................... 16 E. Major Excise Taxes..................................................................................................... 18 II. DETAILS OF PRESENT
    [Show full text]