Subject Sub Topic Details Polity Basics of Constitution Polity the Executive Polity Legislature & Elections

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Subject Sub Topic Details Polity Basics of Constitution Polity the Executive Polity Legislature & Elections GS2 Thursday, 13 May 2021 20:11 Subject Sub Topic Details Polity Basics of Constitution Polity The Executive Polity Legislature & Elections Polity Separation of Centre State Relation 1. Committee Powers & 1. 1st ARC-1966 Federalism a. Background i. Inadequacy of bureaucracy in facing challenges for development activities. ii. Paul H Appleby : Organization and Methods (O&M) iii. Division in cabinet secretariat. b. Aim i. Public administration to carry social & economic goals. ii. Pub Ad responsive to people. c. Recommendation i. Establishment of Interstate council under 263. ( established in 1990, Sarkaria Commission). ii. non-partisan persons as Governor. d. Output i. Dept. of Administrative reforms & Dept of Personnel created. ii. Performance budgeting iii. Introduction of Annual action plan iv. NIC setup under Planning commission 2. Sarkaria 1983 a. 356 in extreme, Residuary power division ( union : tax only ), CM consultation for Governor appointment, included Corporation tax in shareable pool. 3. MM Punchi 2007 a. Limit president pocket veto 6 month, Guidelines for appointment of CM, 2 year cool off period, Selection body for governor including CM, 2. Planning & NITI Ayog 1. Duty of Planning commission a. Implementation of 5 year plan. b. Provide finance to state for scheme ( Now Finance/concerned ministry) 2. Why PC abolished a. Not able to capture new realties of dynamics economy b. Policy formulation lacks center state relation. 3. Relevance of NITI a. Cooperative & Competitive Federalism 4. Concern with NITI a. Biasness to government & private sector , Financial constraints, recommendatory only 5. NiTi : Chairperson PM, CEO, 4 Union Minister 6. Achievement a. Aspirational district program, POSAN abhiyan, Innovation ecosystem, AI block chain. 7. Niti vs Panning Niti Planing Federalism State & UT directly State & UT indirectly involved involved through National Development Council. Executive No power to impose Have power power policies on state. Financial No Yes, for scheme Mains Page 1 Financial No Yes, for scheme Power Specialised Broad specialisation Limited specialisation group group Expert, specialist council , Regional council Process Policy formulation Policy formulated by PC, state with consultation from consultation in resources state allocation 5th & 6th Schedule 1. Points 1. Background a. Both schedules passed in 1949 by CA. 2. Tribal protection culture & resources 3. Self governance 4. Current Issue (5th schedule) a. Xaxa report 2014 ( leaked) i. It is actually state government not governor who frame rules regarding TAC functioning b. TAC functioning is usurped by state government. c. In CG TAC is headed by CM, conflict of interest as COM & TAC both headed by a minister . d. 2010 : Governor have discretionary power ( by AG) 2013 : Governor does not have discretionary power ( AG ) 5. 6th schedule a. Important article i. 244 : administration ii. 275 : statutory grant charged on consolidated fund of india. b. Power i. Judicial, tax , customary law, industry, road, bridges, health, social security, minor irrigation c. Issue i. Legislative power of state over council ii. Conflict of discretionary power of governor iii. Lack of codification of customary law d. Way forward i. Creating elected Village council ii. Recognition of grammsabha under law 2. 5th vs 6th schedule 5th schedule - 244 6th schedule Purpose Provide protection to tribal Provide protection to tribal Based on Bardoloi Committee of constituent assembly State Any except 6th Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, Currently Mizoram Telegana, MH, Guj, Andra, RJ, MP, CG, JH, Orrisa, Himachal Pradesh Governor 1. Modify, annul or limit parliament 1. Final authority to form new Power or state legislatures rule. autonomous district. 2. Regulate Finance 2. Increase or reduce, merge 3. Regulation needs acceptance of with consultation of hill area president Committee 4. Annual report of administration to 3. Determine any dispute over President royalty distribution b/w 5. Governor and also makes rule with district council & state consultation with Tribal advisory government ( discretionary). council for peace and good governance ( rules requires president recommendation) President 1. President can declare some/whole as scheduled area. Mains Page 2 as scheduled area. 2. After consultation of governor can increase area. Judiciary NA Role of HC limited by Governor Executive Executive power of Union extend in Executive authority of states Power 5th for giving direction to state government. Applicabili 1. All state & central law extend 1. Governor Assam & President ty of automatically, governor may for Meghalaya, Tripura, central prohibit. Mizoram can direct any law 2. PRI law not extend automatically . central act not apply to tribal area. 2. If state make law related to List under 3A then it will no extend automatically. ( except Meghalaya). Applicabili Governor Governor : law shall not apply ty of state to an autonomous law district/region or shall apply with modifications. Provisions 1. Tribe advisory council 1. Autonomous district council 1. 20 max ( ADC) 2. 3/4 ST MLA 1. 30 member 2. Can amend or repeal any act of 2. 4 nominated Parliament ( President assent 2. ADC directly under Governor required) 3. Power 1. Land, Health, Education, Forest ( except reserve forest Recent 1. Moran, Motok, Kamtapur News New autonomous council in Assam. 2. Citizen ship Amendment Bill not applicable to 1. ILP area ( Arunachal, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram ). 2. 6th schedule area ( Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Tripura) PESA Covered under it Not covered under it 3. Bru Tribe Issue 1. Bru /Reangs spread across Tripura, Assam, Manipur and Mizoram 2. They recognised as PVT in Tripura 3. In Mizoram they are targeted by groups as they are not consider as indigenous to state. 4. Solution a. Four Party agreement ( GoI, Tripura, Mizoram, Bru) b. Provision i. Union 600 crore package ii. Bru will given land in Tripura iii. 4 Lakh FD to each family for 2 year iv. 5k per month two each per family Panchayat & municipality 1. Background 1. Failing of a. Community Development Program 1952 i. Centralised approach ii. Basic assumption that village as a community of shared Interest went wrong. iii. More benefit to land owner & casteism play role b. National Extension Services (1953 ) Mains Page 3 b. National Extension Services (1953 ) 2. Important Committee 1. LM Singhvi 1986 : Constitutional status to PRI. ( 1964 Lokpal term given by LM singhvi ). 3. Issue 1. Lack of effective devolution of power 2. Insufficient grants/funds 3. Pradhan-Pati system 4. Infrastructure Challenge 5. Lack of support staff 6. Lack of convergence of various government programs. 4. Current initiative 1. E-GramSwaraj - A simplified work based accouting for pachayati raj a. 2. Gram Panchaayat Development Plan in Sabki Yojna Sabka Vikas a. Significance i. Annual plan for each panchayat ii. Stake holder involvement iii. Auditing by stockholder b. Concern i. Lack awareness ii. Lack integration plan 3. Education as a criteria for Local Election a. Rajasthan government scrapped education criteria. b. Argument against education as criteria i. Against grassroots democracy ii. Discrimination towards women & weaker sections iii. Exclusionary move iv. Misplaced focus c. Points in support of Education as criteria i. Progressive legislation ii. Need of hour iii. Improve social indicators iv. Role model effect v. Right to contest is constitutional right it can be curtailed by laws. vi. Uneducated or illiterate can be misled by officials. 4. Panchayat & Pandemic a. Relevance of panchayat during Pandemic i. High level of trust ii. Decentralised governance iii. Decreased corruption iv. Local level knowledge v. Ground level program implementation using AASHA vi. Supply chain service PDS b. Challenge i. Shortage of PDS supply ii. Lack of Traning to Aganbadi. iii. Ambiguity in role iv. Poor data infrastructure v. Lack digital infrastructure in gram sabha meeting c. Way forward i. 2nd ARC : There should be clear cut demarcation of function of each tier of government. ii. Objectivity mapping for gram panchayat to reward and replicate Mains Page 4 ii. Objectivity mapping for gram panchayat to reward and replicate 5. Panchayat & Women a. Issue i. women would be mere rubber stamps ii. Sponsoring candidate by a party may lead to dictating terms of administration by party ( independency lost). b. Defence i. Slowly gaining confidence ii. 50% reservation in local elections iii. Can you call a woman like Tahmina Bibi, who has hardly any formal education, a rubber stamp when she stood against the men in her panchayat of Barogharia village in north Bengal and insisted on the construction of a culvert( puliya). 6. Issue related to PRI a. Removal of Member elected in PRI i. Karnataka: Commissioner empowered but it should be Gram Sabha jurisdiction. b. District Development Council i. Set by amending J&K Panchayat Act 1989 in 2020 ii. Jurisdiction: District except over the areas controlled municipality and corporation. iii. District planning and Development board—> District Development Council iv. DDC= DDC + District Planning Committee (DPC) v. DDC composition 1) 14 Elected member from each district 2) Additional District Development commissioner will be CEO 3) District Planning & Development board DDBs (old body) headed by cabinet minister. vi. DDC function 1) Prepare, approve plan capital expenditure in respective district. 2) Supervise gram Panchayat, Block, District. vii. Why new structure? 1) It is a initial move to implement the entire 73rd amendment in act J&K. viii.
Recommended publications
  • Responsible for Deaths of Involvement in Major Terrorist Attacks Designation Hafiz Mohammed Saeed, Amir, Lashkar-E-Taiba And
    Responsible Involvement in major terrorist Designation for deaths of attacks . January 1998 Wandhama . Declared as terrorist by India under massacre (23) the amended Unlawful Activities . March 2000 Chittisinghpura (Prevention) Act (UAPA) in Hafiz Mohammed 625 people massacre (35) September 2019; Saeed, Amir, . December 2000 Red Fort attack . Designated as a global terrorist by Lashkar-e-Taiba (3) the UN in December 2008; and Jamaat-ud- . May 2002 Kaluchak massacre . Designated by the US Treasury in Daawa (31) May 2008; . March 2003 Nandimarg . Carries reward up to $10 million massacre (24) from the US Government. Zaki-ur-Rahman . October 2005 Delhi Diwali blasts . Declared as terrorist by India under Lakhvi, (62) the amended UAPA in September Operational . March 2006 Varanasi blasts (28) 2019; Commander, . April 2006 Doda massacre (34) . Designated as a global terrorist by Lashkar-e-Taiba . July 2006 Mumbai train blasts the UN in December 2008; (211) . Designated by the US Treasury in . January 2008 Rampur CRPF May 2008. camp attack (8) . November 2008 Mumbai attack (166) Masood Azhar, 125 people . October 2001 Srinagar Assembly . Declared as terrorist under the Amir, Jaish-e- attack (38) December 2001 amended UAPA in September 2019; Mohammed Parliament attack (9) . Designated by the UN as a global . January 2016 Pathankot attack terrorist in May 2019; (7) . Designated by the US Treasury in . September 2016 Uri attack (19) November 2010. October 2017 Humhama BSF camp attack (1) . December 2017 Lethpora CRPF camp attack (4) . February 2018 Sunjawan attack (7) . February 2019 Lethpora suicide attack (40) Dawood Ibrahim 257 people March 1993 Mumbai serial blasts .
    [Show full text]
  • Demilitarization of the Siachen Conflict Zone: Concepts for Implementation and Monitoring
    SANDIA REPORT SAND2007-5670 Unlimited Release Printed September 2007 Demilitarization of the Siachen Conflict Zone: Concepts for Implementation and Monitoring Brigadier (ret.) Asad Hakeem Pakistan Army Brigadier (ret.) Gurmeet Kanwal Indian Army with Michael Vannoni and Gaurav Rajen Sandia National Laboratories Prepared by Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185 and Livermore, California 94550 Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under Contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Approved for public release; further dissemination unlimited. Issued by Sandia National Laboratories, operated for the United States Department of Energy by Sandia Corporation. NOTICE: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government, nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represent that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government, any agency thereof, or any of their contractors or subcontractors. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government, any agency thereof, or any of their contractors. Printed in the United States of America.
    [Show full text]
  • A Siachen Peace Park?
    HARISH KAPADIA A Siachen Peace Park? e were staying in army bunkers at base camp on the Siachen glacier. W In the next room I could hear my son, Nawang, then a young man of 20 years, talking with equally young lieutenants and captains of the Indian army. They were discussing their exploits on the glacier, the war and agitatedly talking about the friends being wounded and killed all around them. One well-meaning officer pointedly said to me as I entered the room to join the discussion: 'I am ready to fight for my country and defend the Siachen. But sir, I am young and I do not want my children and grand-children sitting on this high, forlorn Saltoro ridge defending the Siachen glacier. Why can't we have some solution to this wretched problem?' Another young officer added: 'Look at the glacier, a pristine mountain area polluted almost beyond repair. It will take decades, if not a century to rejuvenate. Something must be done.' These dedicated officers of the Indian army left the seed of an idea in my mind. This world is a legacy for the young, an area like Siachen belongs to them. They were ready to guard it with their lives; they meant well. My son, excited at the prospect of defending his country alongside other officers, had worked hard andjoined the army as a Gorkha Officer. Shortly thereafter he fell to a terrorist bullet in this bloody war in Kashmir. That seed of an idea became a raison d 'etre of my life.
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite Imagery, Remote Sensing, and Diminishing the Risk of Nuclear
    UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org SPECIAL REPORT 2301 Constitution Ave., NW • Washington, DC 20037 • 202.457.1700 • fax 202.429.6063 ABOUT THE REPORT Jay Wise This report examines US concerns regarding India-Pakistan security competition and assesses whether new and emerging technology could mitigate the risks of inadvertent escalation or the unauthorized use or theft of nuclear materials on the subcontinent. It is supported by the Asia Center at Satellite Imagery, the United States Institute of Peace. The analysis and opinion expressed are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the intelligence community, Department of Defense, Department of State, or the US Government. Remote Sensing, and ABOUT THE AUTHOR Jay Wise was a Jennings Randolph Senior Fellow at USIP. Before Diminishing the Risk of that, he served as director for Pakistan at the National Security Council, worked for the Department of Defense on Afghanistan and Pakistan and counterterrorism issues, served as a director Nuclear War in South Asia for Pakistan in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, and was deployed several times for the Department of Defense, including most recently to Afghanistan as a senior advisor in 2014–15. He is currently employed at the State Department. Summary • Structural political and security factors generate persistent security competition on the South Asian subcontinent. • This competition in turn creates a small but difficult-to-close window for nuclear catastrophe. • However unlikely, deployment of tactical nuclear weapons can open the door to inadvertent escalation or unauthorized use or theft. Any of these outcomes would be a catastrophe for the region and the world.
    [Show full text]
  • TERRORISM HAS BECOME EXTENSIVE in INDIA Asim K
    Volume 1. No. 1 page 50-54 TERRORISM HAS BECOME EXTENSIVE IN INDIA Asim K. Karmakar1 Abstract Terrorism is, in the broadest sense, the use of intentionally indiscriminate violence as a means to create terror, or fear, to achieve a political, religious or ideological aim. The impact of terrorism in maintaining law and order, in assuring peace and tranquillity to law-abiding citizenry and in harnessing growth and development, both at the national and international level, is quite grave, gloomy and alarming. In is in this context the paper first of all gives workable definition of terrorism, international law against terrorism to minimize the impact of terrorism, the scale and magnitude of global terrorism and India’s hard wrestling with the terrorism Keywords: Global terrorism; International law; major terrorist activities; Al-Qaida attacks, Cross-border terrorism Received on August05, 2018; Revision received: November 26, 2018, Accepted: December 15, 2018 Introduction Terrorism is, in the broadest sense, the use of intentionally indiscriminate violence as a means to create terror, or fear, to achieve a political, religious or ideological aim (Fortna, 2015). A mini definition of terrorism as provided by the United Nations runs thus: “Any other act intended to cause death or serious bodily injury to a civilian, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities in a situation of an armed conflict, when the purpose of such act, by its nature and context is to intimidate a population, or to compel a government or an international organization to do or abstain from doing any act” But this mini-definition serves only the purpose of convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Issues & Current Affairs February 2019
    UPSC Contemporary Issues & Current Affairs February 2019 By Jawwad Kazi Published by 'Unique Academy Publications Pvt. Ltd.' 1202/39, Vastu Chambers, Opp. Fergusson College Main Gate Shirole Rasta, Pune 4. Ph. 020-25530950 Email. : [email protected] Website : www.theuniqueacademy.com UPSC Contemporary Issues & Current Affairs February 2019 (Study Material) By Jawwad Kazi https://t.me/jawwadkazicurrentaffairs © Unique Aademy Publications Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without permission. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. Year 2019 Cover Design : Unique Academy Publications Team Typesetter :Unique Academy Publications Team Printed By : M. S. Process, Sadashiv Peth, Pune. The Unique Academy Contemporary Issues INDEX Sr. Page No No Propriety of Judges taking up post retirement government 1 8 assignments 2 Forest Right Act 2006 10 3 Education qualification criteria for civic polls 13 4 Minimum Income Guarantee 15 5 Employment Data 18 6 USA - Taliban Talks 20 7 India-Saudi Arabia relations 24 8 Pulwama terror attack 27 9 Need for strategic security doctrine 30 10 India-South Africa relations 33 11 India and UN convention against torture 36 12 Railway Accidents in India 39 13 Banning unregulated deposit scheme ordinance 42 14 India's Looming Water Crisis: 44 15 Leprosy 47 16 National Policy on Electronics 2019 50 17 E-waste Management 52 18 E-Commerce 55 Pradhan Mantri AnnadataAaySanraksHan Abhiyan (PM- 19 58 AASHA) 20 Aspirational Districts Program 61 21 Angel Tax 63 22 e-Pharmacy status in India 65 Contemporary Issues & Current Affairs February - 2019 (Study Material) 3 The Unique Academy Current Affairs INDEX Sr.
    [Show full text]
  • Indo-Pak Relations
    Dr. Debjani Ghosal, Assistant Professor of Political Science, Surendranath College (Study Materials) Indo-Pak Relations Since their independence as new nations in 1947, India and Pakistan have followed a path of mutual animosity. Pakistan was created as a national homeland for the Muslim-majority areas of the subcontinent, while India proposed to become a secular nation that included about 85 percent Hindus, but also more than ten percent Muslims as well as large numbers of Sikhs, Christians and members of other religions. Soon after the partition of the sub-continent into the two nations, about 17 million people fled their homes and journeyed to either Pakistan or India. In one of the largest exchanges of populations in history, violence soon broke out with Muslims on one side and Sikhs and Hindus on the other. The resulting blood shed in the Punjab and West Bengal regions left more than one million people dead in its wake. In the midst of this refugee movement and open violence, the governments of India and Pakistan hastily tried to divide the assets of British India between the two new countries. From weapons and money, down to paper clips and archaeological treasures, all had to be divided.The British had left behind, besides about half of the subcontinent that it directly governed, some 562 independent or "princely" states. The provision was that each state could remain independent, join Pakistan or accede to India. A violent competition soon resulted as the two new nations sought to win to their own nations the largest and most strategically located states, such as Hyderabad and Kashmir.
    [Show full text]
  • 7Th November 2016 Dear Member, India-UK Joint Statement During
    7th November 2016 Dear Member, India-UK Joint Statement during the visit of Prime Minister of the United Kingdom to India The Prime Minister Theresa May visited India during 6-8 November 2016 at the invitation of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. This was her first bilateral visit outside Europe after taking over as the Prime Minister of the UK. The visit was designed to further strengthen the India–UK Strategic Partnership, guided by a shared vision for the future and supported by a concrete and comprehensive roadmap of bilateral and global engagement. Prime Minister Modi welcomed Prime Minister May and discussed all aspects of India-UK relations. The two leaders recalled the strong bonds of friendship that exist between the two countries characterised by extensive political engagement, deep economic cooperation, and ever expanding scientific and technological collaboration. The two states enjoy vibrant people to people relations supported by the 1.5 million strong Indian diaspora in the UK and an increasing convergence on the way forward on key global challenges of the 21st century. Our shared history, our shared connections and our shared values make this a natural partnership. They form the foundation of a unique friendship. The two Prime Ministers emphasized working together on a contemporary and forward-looking global partnership to promote peace, security and prosperity of the two countries and act as a force for good in the world. During Prime Minister Modi’s visit to the UK last year, the two countries set out a bold vision for the UK-India Strategic Partnership. Both countries today commit to turn this vision into reality through closer, practical cooperation that delivers real benefits to both the countries.
    [Show full text]
  • China and Crisis Management in South Asia
    Investigating Crises: South Asia’s Lessons, Evolving Dynamics, and Trajectories CHINA AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT IN SOUTH ASIA Yun Sun & Hannah Haegeland China’s growing role as a regional and global power may translate to greater Chinese third-party involvement in the management of future interstate crises. The nature of this involvement is uncertain, but historical trajectories of China’s approach to the subcontinent offer some insight. In South Asia, despite shared borders and historic relations with both India and Pakistan, China has played a minimal role in the actual and near-wars between its southern neighbors, instead leaving any third-party management largely in the hands of the United States and European powers. China does not yet view itself as either a military or political global superpower, and thus the incentive to adopt U.S.-style leadership in crisis management is low. Moreover, even as China rises as a global leader, it approaches third-party crisis management differently than the United States and views its interests and exposure to risks abroad through a distinct prism. Yet, as a part of China’s immediate periphery, the peace and stability of the subcontinent constitutes a key area for China’s national security — particularly after the 1998 nuclear tests by India and Pakistan. Crises between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan could have catastrophic implications for China’s critical national interests. Further, as the global geography of China’s economy expands, Beijing’s risk exposure as a third party in emerging bilateral crises increases. Historically, when India-Pakistan crises have emerged, the United States has intervened in a third-party manager role.
    [Show full text]
  • SAMEEP Student and MEA Engagement Programme
    India and her neighbours India places neighborhood engagement at the heart of its foreign policy Till our Borders are Secure, we cannot Emerge as a Power of importance to the world Afghanistan Helping in stabilizing Nepal & Bhutan Development assistance, hydro electricity Pakistan Protracted conflict Over Kashmir issue Myanmar Gateway to ASEAN Bangladesh Assistance, connectivity Sri Lanka Maritime ties Maldives Maritime security, climate change impacts There is no Permanent Friend and permanent Enemy. There is only permanent interest Neighbourhood First Political and diplomatic priority to its immediate neighbours and the Indian Ocean island states Provide neighbours with support, as needed, in the form of resources, equipment, and training. Greater connectivity and integration, so as to improve the free flow of goods, people, energy, capital, and information. India has also become more forthcoming in providing support and in capacity building, including providing humanitarian assistance to Nepal or Sri Lanka. With Bangladesh, the completion of the Land Boundary Agreement, improvements in energy connectivity and steps taken towards accessing the port of Chittagong have all been crucial developments. India’s focus on connectivity is also gradually extending outward, whether to Chabahar in Iran or Kaladan in Myanmar. India has also expressed its willingness to develop issue-specific groupings that are not held hostage to consensus. For example Bangladesh-Bhutan-India-Nepal (BBIN) grouping – meant to advance motor vehicle movement, water power management, and inter- grid connectivity With respect to all of its neighbours, including Nepal, India has taken concrete steps over the past two years to promote goodwill and deepen economic and social connectivity Terrorism emanating against India by entities based in neighbourhood and supported by elements of the state remains a top priority.
    [Show full text]
  • D:\Journals\RJPP\2019\Page Make
    Un Resolution 1267 and its Importance for India and the World Akash Kumar Un Resolution 1267 and its Importance for India and the World Akash Kumar Deptt. of Pol. Sci., IGNOU, New Delhi Email: [email protected] Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Abstract United Nations Security Council (UNSC) declared Jaish-e- Akash Kumar Mohammed (JeM) chief Masood Azhar a ‘global terrorist’ on 1st may, 2019 The decision was taken under the UNSC Resolution 1267. Masood Azhar is the founder and leader of the Pakistan-based terrorist Un Resolution 1267 organisation Jaish-e-Mohammed, active mainly in the Pakistani- and its Importance for administered portion of the state of Jammu and Kashmir. His India and the World organisation has been responsible for carrying out the 2001 Indian Parliament attack, 2008 Mumbai attacks, 2016 Pathankot attack and the 2019 Pulwama attack. RJPP 2019, Vol. XVII, No. 1, pp.46-50 Article No.6 Online available at : https://anubooks.com/ ?page_id=5286 46 RJPP Vol. XVII No.1 2019 ISSN (P): 0976-3635 (e):2454-3411 Impact Factor 6.76 (SJIF) Introduction UNSC 1267 committee- At the time of its establishment, UNSC Resolutions Committee was known as the Al-Qaida and Taliban Sanctions Committee. It was split on June 17, 2011, which led to the creation of a separate Taliban Sanctions Committee to deal with the terror outfit which has been actively involved in terror attacks since its inception in 1994. Along with all subsequent resolutions, Resolution 1267 has been adopted under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter which is focused on the UN Security Council’s powers to maintain peace.
    [Show full text]
  • South Asia's Lessons, Evolving Dynamics, and Trajectories
    South Asia’s Lessons, Evolving Dynamics, and Trajectories Edited by Sameer Lalwani and Hannah Haegeland South Asia’s Lessons, Evolving Dynamics, and Trajectories Edited by Sameer Lalwani and Hannah Haegeland JANUARY 2018  © Copyright 2018 by the Stimson Center. All rights reserved. Printed in Washington, D.C. ISBN 978-0-9997659-0-6 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017919496 Stimson Center 1211 Connecticut Avenue, NW 8th Floor Washington, D.C. 20036 U.S.A. Visit www.stimson.org for more information about Stimson’s research. Investigating Crises: South Asia’s Lessons, Evolving Dynamics, and Trajectories CONTENTS Preface . 7 Key Terms and Acronyms . 9 Introduction . 11 Sameer Lalwani Anatomy of a Crisis: Explaining Crisis Onset in India-Pakistan Relations . 23 Sameer Lalwani & Hannah Haegeland Organizing for Crisis Management: Evaluating India’s Experience in Three Case Studies . .57 Shyam Saran Conflict Resolution and Crisis Management: Challenges in Pakistan-India Relations . 75 Riaz Mohammad Khan Intelligence, Strategic Assessment, and Decision Process Deficits: The Absence of Indian Learning from Crisis to Crisis . 97 Saikat Datta Self-Referencing the News: Media, Policymaking, and Public Opinion in India-Pakistan Crises . 115 Ruhee Neog Crisis Management in Nuclear South Asia: A Pakistani Perspective . 143 Zafar Khan China and Crisis Management in South Asia . 165 Yun Sun & Hannah Haegeland Crisis Intensity and Nuclear Signaling in South Asia . 187 Michael Krepon & Liv Dowling New Horizons, New Risks: A Scenario-based Approach to Thinking about the Future of Crisis Stability in South Asia . 221 Iskander Rehman New Challenges for Crisis Management . 251 Michael Krepon Contributors . 265 Contents 6 PREFACE With gratitude and pride I present Stimson’s latest South Asia Program book, Investigating Crises: South Asia’s Lessons, Evolving Dynamics, and Trajectories.
    [Show full text]