Contemporary Issues & Current Affairs February 2019
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Negotiating the Indus Waters Treaty: an Historical Assessment
Journal of the Research Society of Pakistan Volume No. 57, Issue No. 1 (January – June, 2020) Muhammad Nawaz Bhatti* Farzad Ahmad ** Asia Saif Alvi *** Muhammad Kashif Ali **** Nabila Akhtar ***** Negotiating the Indus Waters Treaty: An Historical Assessment Abstract International watercourses are the only supplementary sources of water for the many states having arid or semi-arid climatic conditions that could economically be developed to bridge the rapidly increasing gap between demand and supply. In absence of any international law to deal with uses of international watercourses other than navigational purposes, agreements among co-riparian states are very important for the development of an entire basin. Although the U. N. Convention on the Uses of International Rivers for non-navigational purposes was adopted by the U. N. General Assembly in 1997 and after the rectification of 35 Member States, it has been functioning since 2014, but the importance of the negotiation processes that resulted in numerous successful agreements on water resource management can never be denied. This document provides an historical analysis of the negotiating process which culminated into the Indus Waters Treaty. Keywords: Partition of India, Pakistan, India, Water dispute, Negotiations, Indus waters Treaty Introduction In arid and semi-arid climatic regions, water is considered one of the most important factors of development. The availability of sufficient water in those areas in terms of quantity and quality, suitable for all purposes, has already become a serious issue. All tendencies show that difficulties emerging due to this critical issue would increase significantly in coming years. Starting in the 1990s and beyond, the management and development of international watercourses would become an increasingly critical problem. -
Responsible for Deaths of Involvement in Major Terrorist Attacks Designation Hafiz Mohammed Saeed, Amir, Lashkar-E-Taiba And
Responsible Involvement in major terrorist Designation for deaths of attacks . January 1998 Wandhama . Declared as terrorist by India under massacre (23) the amended Unlawful Activities . March 2000 Chittisinghpura (Prevention) Act (UAPA) in Hafiz Mohammed 625 people massacre (35) September 2019; Saeed, Amir, . December 2000 Red Fort attack . Designated as a global terrorist by Lashkar-e-Taiba (3) the UN in December 2008; and Jamaat-ud- . May 2002 Kaluchak massacre . Designated by the US Treasury in Daawa (31) May 2008; . March 2003 Nandimarg . Carries reward up to $10 million massacre (24) from the US Government. Zaki-ur-Rahman . October 2005 Delhi Diwali blasts . Declared as terrorist by India under Lakhvi, (62) the amended UAPA in September Operational . March 2006 Varanasi blasts (28) 2019; Commander, . April 2006 Doda massacre (34) . Designated as a global terrorist by Lashkar-e-Taiba . July 2006 Mumbai train blasts the UN in December 2008; (211) . Designated by the US Treasury in . January 2008 Rampur CRPF May 2008. camp attack (8) . November 2008 Mumbai attack (166) Masood Azhar, 125 people . October 2001 Srinagar Assembly . Declared as terrorist under the Amir, Jaish-e- attack (38) December 2001 amended UAPA in September 2019; Mohammed Parliament attack (9) . Designated by the UN as a global . January 2016 Pathankot attack terrorist in May 2019; (7) . Designated by the US Treasury in . September 2016 Uri attack (19) November 2010. October 2017 Humhama BSF camp attack (1) . December 2017 Lethpora CRPF camp attack (4) . February 2018 Sunjawan attack (7) . February 2019 Lethpora suicide attack (40) Dawood Ibrahim 257 people March 1993 Mumbai serial blasts . -
Indus Waters Treaty
Title: Indus Waters Treaty 1960 between the Government of India, the Government of Pakistan and the International Bank for reconstruction and development Parties: India, Pakistan Basin: Indus Date: 9/19/1960 INDIA, PAKISTAN and INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT The Indus Waters Treaty 1960 (with annexes). Signed at Karachi on 19 September 1960 Protocol to the above-mentioned Treaty. Signed on 27 November, 2 and 23 December 1960 Official text: English. Registered by India on 16 January 1962. No. 6032. THE INDUS WATERS TREATY 1960 1 BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, THE GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN AND THE INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT. SIGNED KARACHI, ON 19 SEPTEMBER 1960 PREAMBLE The Government of India and the Government of Pakistan, being equally desirous of attaining the most complete and satisfactory utilisation of the waters of the Indus system of rivers and recognizing the need, therefore, of fixing and delimiting, in a spirit of goodwill and friendship, the rights and obligations of each in relation to the other concerning the use of these waters and of making provision for the settlement, in a cooperative spirit, of all such questions as may hereafter arise in regard to the interpretation or application of the provisions agreed upon herein, have resolved to conclude a Treaty in furtherance of these objectives, and for this purpose named as their plenipotentiaries: The Government of India: Shri Jawaharlal Neliru, Prime Minister of India, and The Government of Pakistan: Field Marshal Mohammad Ayub Khan, H.P., H.J., President of Pakistan who, having communicated to each other their respective Full Powers and found them in good and due form, have agreed upon the following Articles and Annexures: Article I DEFINITIONS As used in this Treaty: (1) The terms "Article" and "Arinexure" mean respectively an Article of, an Annexure to, this Treaty. -
Transboundary River Basin Overview – Indus
0 [Type here] Irrigation in Africa in figures - AQUASTAT Survey - 2016 Transboundary River Basin Overview – Indus Version 2011 Recommended citation: FAO. 2011. AQUASTAT Transboundary River Basins – Indus River Basin. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, Italy The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licencerequest or addressed to [email protected]. -
WATER SECTOR in PAKISTAN POLICY, POLITICS, MANAGEMENT
IDSA Monograph Series No. 18 April 2013 WATER SECTOR in PAKISTAN POLICY, POLITICS, MANAGEMENT MEDHA BISHT WATER SECTOR IN PAKISTAN: POLICY, POLITICS, MANAGEMENT | 1 IDSA Monograph Series No. 18 April 2013 WATER SECTOR IN PAKISTAN POLICY, POLITICS, MANAGEMENT MEDHA BISHT 2 | MEDHA BISHT Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, New Delhi. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, sorted in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photo-copying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA). ISBN: 978-93-82169-17-8 Disclaimer: The views expressed in this Monograph are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Institute or the Government of India. First Published: April 2013 Price: Rs. 280/- Published by: Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses No.1, Development Enclave, Rao Tula Ram Marg, Delhi Cantt., New Delhi - 110 010 Tel. (91-11) 2671-7983 Fax.(91-11) 2615 4191 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.idsa.in Layout & Cover by: Vaijayanti Patankar & Geeta Printed at: M/S A. M. Offsetters A-57, Sector-10, Noida-201 301 (U.P.) Mob: 09810888667 E-mail: [email protected] WATER SECTOR IN PAKISTAN: POLICY, POLITICS, MANAGEMENT | 3 CONTENTS Acknowledgements ......................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION .............................................................. 6 PART I Chapter One ................................................................. -
TERRORISM HAS BECOME EXTENSIVE in INDIA Asim K
Volume 1. No. 1 page 50-54 TERRORISM HAS BECOME EXTENSIVE IN INDIA Asim K. Karmakar1 Abstract Terrorism is, in the broadest sense, the use of intentionally indiscriminate violence as a means to create terror, or fear, to achieve a political, religious or ideological aim. The impact of terrorism in maintaining law and order, in assuring peace and tranquillity to law-abiding citizenry and in harnessing growth and development, both at the national and international level, is quite grave, gloomy and alarming. In is in this context the paper first of all gives workable definition of terrorism, international law against terrorism to minimize the impact of terrorism, the scale and magnitude of global terrorism and India’s hard wrestling with the terrorism Keywords: Global terrorism; International law; major terrorist activities; Al-Qaida attacks, Cross-border terrorism Received on August05, 2018; Revision received: November 26, 2018, Accepted: December 15, 2018 Introduction Terrorism is, in the broadest sense, the use of intentionally indiscriminate violence as a means to create terror, or fear, to achieve a political, religious or ideological aim (Fortna, 2015). A mini definition of terrorism as provided by the United Nations runs thus: “Any other act intended to cause death or serious bodily injury to a civilian, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities in a situation of an armed conflict, when the purpose of such act, by its nature and context is to intimidate a population, or to compel a government or an international organization to do or abstain from doing any act” But this mini-definition serves only the purpose of convention. -
Indo-Pak Relations
Dr. Debjani Ghosal, Assistant Professor of Political Science, Surendranath College (Study Materials) Indo-Pak Relations Since their independence as new nations in 1947, India and Pakistan have followed a path of mutual animosity. Pakistan was created as a national homeland for the Muslim-majority areas of the subcontinent, while India proposed to become a secular nation that included about 85 percent Hindus, but also more than ten percent Muslims as well as large numbers of Sikhs, Christians and members of other religions. Soon after the partition of the sub-continent into the two nations, about 17 million people fled their homes and journeyed to either Pakistan or India. In one of the largest exchanges of populations in history, violence soon broke out with Muslims on one side and Sikhs and Hindus on the other. The resulting blood shed in the Punjab and West Bengal regions left more than one million people dead in its wake. In the midst of this refugee movement and open violence, the governments of India and Pakistan hastily tried to divide the assets of British India between the two new countries. From weapons and money, down to paper clips and archaeological treasures, all had to be divided.The British had left behind, besides about half of the subcontinent that it directly governed, some 562 independent or "princely" states. The provision was that each state could remain independent, join Pakistan or accede to India. A violent competition soon resulted as the two new nations sought to win to their own nations the largest and most strategically located states, such as Hyderabad and Kashmir. -
In the Surge of Healing?
In the surge of healing? The case of Indus Basin Rabail Gul Urban Studies Master’s Thesis (Two-year master) 30 credits Spring 2017 Supervisor: Guy Baeten Site of River Ravi – Branching from Indus Basin (Malik, 2014) Acknowledgement The portrayal of water security-scarcity nexus could not be possible without the help of work from Mustafa. Weaving the real and ideal world this dissertation greatly benefited from the comments provided by Carina Listerborn and Maria Persdotter during the thought process. The critical analysis of case studies has been enriched with data and evidence provided by Muhammad Javed and Kashif Javed since the beginning. They also helped in organizing the interviews from professionals which proved an immense assistance. An insight of the official documents has also been provided by Ayesha Shoib which motivated the methods of analyzing the whole phenomenon. This paper would be hardly possible without the moral support of my parents Misbah Abid and Abid Ghafoor. List of Selected Abbreviations AK Azad Kashmir BBC British Broadcasting Corporation CM Cubic Meters CPEC China Pakistan Economic Corridor FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation GDP Gross Domestic Product HKH Hindu Kush Himalayan IBIS Indus Basin Irrigation System IRS Indus River System IRSA Indus River System Authority IWRM Integrated water resources management IWT Indus Waters Treaty J&K Jammu and Kashmir LoC Line of Cntrol LDA Lahore Development Authority MCM Million Cubic Meters MR Marala Ravi SCARPs Salinity Control and Reclamation Projects UIB Upper Indus Basin UNEP United Nations Environment Programme UNSC United Nations Security Council USSR Union of Soviet Socialist Republics WAPDA Water and Power Development Authority WB World Bank WWC World Water Council Table of Contents Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... -
7Th November 2016 Dear Member, India-UK Joint Statement During
7th November 2016 Dear Member, India-UK Joint Statement during the visit of Prime Minister of the United Kingdom to India The Prime Minister Theresa May visited India during 6-8 November 2016 at the invitation of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. This was her first bilateral visit outside Europe after taking over as the Prime Minister of the UK. The visit was designed to further strengthen the India–UK Strategic Partnership, guided by a shared vision for the future and supported by a concrete and comprehensive roadmap of bilateral and global engagement. Prime Minister Modi welcomed Prime Minister May and discussed all aspects of India-UK relations. The two leaders recalled the strong bonds of friendship that exist between the two countries characterised by extensive political engagement, deep economic cooperation, and ever expanding scientific and technological collaboration. The two states enjoy vibrant people to people relations supported by the 1.5 million strong Indian diaspora in the UK and an increasing convergence on the way forward on key global challenges of the 21st century. Our shared history, our shared connections and our shared values make this a natural partnership. They form the foundation of a unique friendship. The two Prime Ministers emphasized working together on a contemporary and forward-looking global partnership to promote peace, security and prosperity of the two countries and act as a force for good in the world. During Prime Minister Modi’s visit to the UK last year, the two countries set out a bold vision for the UK-India Strategic Partnership. Both countries today commit to turn this vision into reality through closer, practical cooperation that delivers real benefits to both the countries. -
Punjab Board Class 9 Social Science Textbook Part 1 English
SOCIAL SCIENCE-IX PART-I PUNJAB SCHOOL EDUCATION BOARD Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar © Punjab Government First Edition : 2018............................ 38406 Copies All rights, including those of translation, reproduction and annotation etc., are reserved by the Punjab Government. Editor & Co-ordinator Geography : Sh. Raminderjit Singh Wasu, Deputy Director (Open School), Punjab School Education Board. Economics : Smt. Amarjit Kaur Dalam, Deputy Director (Academic), Punjab School Education Board. WARNING 1. The Agency-holders shall not add any extra binding with a view to charge extra money for the binding. (Ref. Cl. No. 7 of agreement with Agency-holders). 2. Printing, Publishing, Stocking, Holding or Selling etc., of spurious Text- book qua text-books printed and published by the Punjab School Education Board is a cognizable offence under Indian Penal Code. Price : ` 106.00/- Published by : Secretary, Punjab School Education Board, Vidya Bhawan Phase-VIII, Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar-160062. & Printed by Tania Graphics, Sarabha Nagar, Jalandhar City (ii) FOREWORD Punjab School Education Board, has been engaged in the endeavour to prepare textbooks for all the classes at school level. The book in hand is one in the series and has been prepared for the students of class IX. Punjab Curriculum Framework (PCF) 2013 which is based on National Curriculum Framework (NCF) 2005, recommends that the child’s life at school must be linked to their life outside the school. The syllabi and textbook in hand is developed on the basis of the principle which makes a departure from the legacy of bookish learning to activity-based learning in the direction of child-centred system. -
Dams, Rivers & People
Dams, Rivers & People UPDATE ON RELATED ISSUES SANDRP ISSUE ONE FEBRUARY 2003 INDEX About DRP 1 Irrigation Options 25 River Link: Some Basic Information 2 Hudco money sunk in Irrigation Bonds26 Govt Com Sceptical of River Linking 3 A debate on PIM 28 Proposed East Flowing River Links 4 Groundwater: Rajasthan, Haryana 29 Scepticism about River Link Rhetoric 5 You are Wrong, Mr Prime Minister 30 TU against River Link proposals 6 Publication Available with SANDRP 31 Decommissioning of Dumbur 7 Water Privatisation in Parliament 32 Indictment of Khuga Project by CAG 8 Privatisation Divorced from reality 33 NHPC indicted in CAG Report (2002) 8 QUOTES 34 Kathmandu Declaration 9 Ganga (in)Action Plan 35 Deteriorating Indus Delta 11 Food Management 36 CRBIP Complaint to ADB insp. Panel 12 2002: “All India Drought Year” 37 Drought, State and Civil society 13 Farmgate: Impact of North on South 38 Development as if democracy is real 15 Sugar Scam in Maharashtra 39 Opposition to Bhavani Diversion 16 Small Hydro in Uttaranchal, Nepal 40 News from Narmada valley 17 Power Games of Planners 41 Illegal Public Hearing at Teesta Dam 19 Power Finance News 42 Chamera Coffer dam Washed away 20 President’s Address to Parliament 43 Opposition to Tipaimukh Dam 20 Your Responses 44 Indonesian Dam Affected Sue Japan 23 Politics at WSSD 24 ABOUT DAMS, RIVERS & PEOPLE The DRP will be available both in electronic (text and word To clearly reflect the issues we are dealing with, we have versions) and printed versions. The softcopies of DRP are decided to change the name of our periodical to Dams, also available at www.narmada.org/sandrp and Rivers & People. -
China and Crisis Management in South Asia
Investigating Crises: South Asia’s Lessons, Evolving Dynamics, and Trajectories CHINA AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT IN SOUTH ASIA Yun Sun & Hannah Haegeland China’s growing role as a regional and global power may translate to greater Chinese third-party involvement in the management of future interstate crises. The nature of this involvement is uncertain, but historical trajectories of China’s approach to the subcontinent offer some insight. In South Asia, despite shared borders and historic relations with both India and Pakistan, China has played a minimal role in the actual and near-wars between its southern neighbors, instead leaving any third-party management largely in the hands of the United States and European powers. China does not yet view itself as either a military or political global superpower, and thus the incentive to adopt U.S.-style leadership in crisis management is low. Moreover, even as China rises as a global leader, it approaches third-party crisis management differently than the United States and views its interests and exposure to risks abroad through a distinct prism. Yet, as a part of China’s immediate periphery, the peace and stability of the subcontinent constitutes a key area for China’s national security — particularly after the 1998 nuclear tests by India and Pakistan. Crises between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan could have catastrophic implications for China’s critical national interests. Further, as the global geography of China’s economy expands, Beijing’s risk exposure as a third party in emerging bilateral crises increases. Historically, when India-Pakistan crises have emerged, the United States has intervened in a third-party manager role.