Working Together in the Coquitlam Watershed

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Working Together in the Coquitlam Watershed Collaborating for Success? Working Together in the Coquitlam Watershed By Diana Nikolic B.A., University ot" Victoria, 1996 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS (PLANNING) in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES School of Community and Regional Planning We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA December 2001 © Diana Nikolic, 2001 UBC Special Collections - Thesis Authorisation Form Page 1 of 1 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of Sc "\QD QT Gb VVlM\JlVl \" The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada Date r r Abstract Water use planning today necessitates an integrated approach that includes sustainability considerations. We rely upon our water resources to satisfy a lengthy list of needs yet we often mistreat this irreplaceable, vital resource. Members of society are acknowledging the situation and are increasingly expressing their interest in being involved in processes to address these issues. It is the planner's responsibility to respond with a method that is capable of involving the public in complex planning issues such water use planning. The identification and application of a suitable methodology can commence with the articulation of indicators of success. By being conscious of desired goals, the process necessary for their attainment is more readily identified. A study of existing literature indicates empowerment, fairness, trust and efficiency are regular indicators of success. Communicative facilitation, the product of unifying the fundamentals of communicative planning and effective facilitation, is a means of working toward the realization of these success indicators. These process components are both complemented and promoted through a collaborative effort. Both the process methodology and its application influence the likelihood of achieving the identified process success indicators. Analysis of a case study, in this instance the Coquitlam Buntzen Water Use Planning process, allows extrication of recommendations and caveats that are applicable not only to collaborative water use planning but also to complex planning processes in general. • A process should focus on reaching the best agreement possible. Allowing a range of levels of agreement while documenting points of disagreement is recommended. • A process's potential to contribute to the development of a positive precedent should be recognized. Every effort should be invested to maximize opportunities to improve levels of trust and perceptions of fairness since current processes affect future efforts. • Process facilitators should be adept in the role of facilitator, analyst, mediator and negotiator while practicing the principles of communicative planning. • It is difficult for a process to manage its schedule and budget to the satisfaction of all participants; however, the evaluation of efficiency is critical to assessment of overall process success. • To avoid confusion and frustration, it should be clearly established prior to process commencement whether a process involves the public generally, stakeholders or representatives. • Scope should be as broadly defined as possible. Although the level of complexity can be expected to increase, the benefits of an integrated approach as well as the frustrations associated with scope limitation support its expansion. Once boundaries are set, they should be explicitly articulated. As the world becomes in increasingly complex place, the planner is faced with the task of facilitating efforts for interests to work together to make good decisions through quality processes. Collaborating for Success? Working Together in the Coquitlam Watershed Table of Contents Abstract Table of Contents iii List of Tables vii List of Figures viii Acknowledgements ix 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Land Use Planning Within Watersheds 2 1.2 Definitions 3 1.3 Research Questions 4 1.4 Scope 6 1.5 Chapter Summary 6 2 ESTABLISHING THE LINK BETWEEN PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT AND WATER USE PLANNING 8 2.1 Water Use Planning 8 2.1.1 Integrated Water Management 9 2.1.2 Sustainability 11 2.2 Public Involvement 12 2.2.1 Process vs. Product 12 2.2.2 The Public-An Active Member of Society 12 2.2.3 Public Involvement- Benefits for Everyone 13 2.2.4 Necessary Process Components 14 2.2.5 Addressing Critiques of Public Involvement 15 2.2.6 A Taxonomy of Public Involvement 16 2.3 Success Indicators 18 2.3.1 Empowerment 18 2.3.2 Fairness 21 2.3.3 Trust 22 2.3.4 Efficiency 23 2.4 Success Indicators and Communicative Planning 25 2.4.1 Communicative Facilitation 25 2.5 Consensus 27 2.6 Chapter Summary 30 Collaborating for Success? Working Together in the Coquitlam Watershed iii 3 FUNDAMENTALS OF COLLABORATION 31 3.1 A Response to Our Times 31 3.2 Appropriateness of Collaboration 31 3.3 Collaboration Expectations ; 32 3.4 Motivation to collaborate 32 3.5 Approaches to Collaborative Planning 33 3.5.1 Shared Vision 33 3.5.2 Conflict Resolution 34 3.6 Facilitating Collaboration 35 3.7 Implementation 36 3.8 Gray's Phases 36 3.8.1 Phase I: Problem Setting 36 3.8.2 Phase II: Direction Setting 38 3.8.3 Phase III: Implementation 39 3.9 Chapter Summary 40 4 CASE STUDY BACKGROUND 41 4.1 The Coquitlam System 42 4.1.1 The Coquitlam River - a Component of the Fraser System 42 4.1.2 Coquitlam River's Contribution to Hydro Power 43 4.1.3 Coquitlam River's Contribution to Water Supply 44 4.2 History 45 4.2.1 Impacts 47 4.3 What is a WUP? 49 4.4 Instigation of WUPs 49 4.4.1 The Ward Report 49 4.4.2 Existing Fish Legislation 50 4.4.3 Public Scrutiny 51 4.5 WUP Guidelines 52 4.6 Coquitlam Buntzen Water Use Plan (CBWUP) 53 4.6.1 Consultative Committee (CC) 54 4.6.2 First Nations 54 4.6.3 Dividing the CC into Smaller Groups 56 4.6.4 Facilitation 58 4.7 Chapter Summary 60 5 METHODOLOGY 61 Collaborating for Success? Working Together in the Coquitlam Watershed iv 5.1 Application of a Qualitative Approach 61 5.2 Qualitative Analysis - As Applied to the CBWUP 62 5.2.1 Information Collection 62 5.2.2 Data interpretation 65 5.2.3 Methodological limitations 65 5.3 Other WUP Studies 66 5.4 Chapter Summary 67 6 STUDY OF THE PHASES OF COLLABORATION & FACILITATION 68 6.1 Context 68 6.1.1 Motivation to collaborate 68 6.2 Process 69 6.3 Phase I - Problem Setting 69 6.3.1 Common definition of the problem 69 6.3.2 Commitment to collaborate 71 6.3.3 Identification of stakeholders 74 6.3.4 Legitimacy of stakeholders 76 6.3.5 Convener characteristics 78 6.3.6 Identification of resources 79 6.4 Phase II - Direction Setting 81 6.4.1 Establishing ground rules 81 6.4.2 Agenda setting 83 6.4.3 Joint information search 84 6.4.4 Exploring options 87 6.4.5 Reaching agreement and closing the deal 88 6.5 Phase HI - Implementation 91 6.5.1 Dealing with constituencies 91 6.5.2 Building external support 93 6.5.3 Monitoring the agreement and ensuring compliance 94 6.6 Facilitation 95 6.6.1 Consultant perspective 95 6.6.2 Participant perspective 103 6.6.3 Keeping the context in mind 106 6.7 Findings 108 6.8 Chapter Summary Ill 7 ACHIEVEMENT OF SUCCESS INDICATORS 112 7.1 Success Indicators 112 7.2 Empowerment.... 112 7.3 Fairness 114 Collaborating for Success? Working Together in the Coquitlam Watershed v 7.4 Trust 115 7.5 Efficiency 117 7.6 Cynicism 119 7.7 Findings 120 7.8 Chapter Summary 121 8 FINAL COMMENTS 123 8.1 Goal and Objectives Review 123 8.2 Extractable Lessons 124 8.3 Further Study 129 8.4 Implications for Planning 130 8.5 To Conclude 130 References 132 Appendix I: WUP Guidelines 139 Appendix II: Participant Details 141 Appendix III: Objectives 143 Appendix IV: Questions for Facilitators 145 Appendix V: Questions for Process Participants 147 Appendix VI: Issues for Resolution Outside the WUP 149 Appendix VII: Guiding Principles 150 Appendix VIII: Communication Process 152 Collaborating for Success? Working Together in the Coquitlam Watershed vi List of Tables Table 1: Designs for Collaboration 34 Table 2: Active CC Members as of Summer 2001 54 Table 3: Differences Between Qualitative and Quantitative Research Approaches 61 Table 4: CBWUP Meeting Summary 63 Table 5: Respondent Coding System 63 Table 6: 7 Principles of Good Process 82 Table 7: Summary Evaluation Table of Collaboration Phases 109 Table 8: Summary Evaluation Table of Attainment of Success Indicators 121 Collaborating for Success? Working Together in the Coquitlam Watershed vii List of Figures Figure 1: Hydrologic Cycle 9 Figure 2: Arnstein's Ladder 17 Figure 3: The Fraser Basin 41 Figure 4: Coquitlam Lake-An Aerial View 43 Figure 5: Path of Hydropower Generation 44 Figure 6: Lower Mainland Drinking Water Sources 45 Figure 7: Historical Summary 48 Figure 8: First Nations Traditional Lands 56 Figure 9: WUP Organization Chart 59 Figure 10: The Analysis Process 124 Collaborating for Success? Working Together in the Coquitlam Watershed viii Acknowledgement There are several individuals who deserve recognition for their contributions to this effort. Tony Dorcey and Tim McDaniels's commitment, during the past two years, to instilling an appreciation for theory and flow of logic, and goals and objectives have shaped not only this study but also my thinking.
Recommended publications
  • The Story of the Coquitlam River Watershed Past, Present and Future
    Fraser Salmon and Watersheds Program – Living Rivers Project Coquitlam River Stakeholder Engagement Phase I The Story of the Coquitlam River Watershed Past, Present and Future Prepared for: The City of Coquitlam and Kwikwetlem First Nation Funding provided by: The Pacific Salmon Foundation Additional funding provided by Fisheries and Oceans Canada Prepared by: Jahlie Houghton, JR Environmental – April 2008 Updated by: Coquitlam River Watershed Work Group – October 2008 Final Report: October 24, 2008 2 File #: 13-6410-01/000/2008-1 Doc #: 692852.v1B Acknowledgements I would like to offer a special thanks to individuals of the community who took the time to meet with me, who not only helped to educate me on historical issues and events in the watershed, but also provided suggestions to their vision of what a successful watershed coordinator could contribute in the future. These people include Elaine Golds, Niall Williams, Don Gillespie, Dianne Ramage, Tony Matahlija, Tim Tyler, John Jakse, Vance Reach, Sherry Carroll, Fin Donnelly, Maurice Coulter-Boisvert, Matt Foy, Derek Bonin, Charlotte Bemister, Dave Hunter, Jim Allard, Tom Vanichuk, and George Turi. I would also like to thank members of the City of Coquitlam, Kwikwetlem First Nation, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, and Watershed Watch Salmon Society (representative for Kwikwetlem) who made this initiative possible and from whom advice was sought throughout this process. These include Jennifer Wilkie, Dave Palidwor, Mike Carver, Margaret Birch, Hagen Hohndorf, Melony Burton, Tom Cadieux, Dr. Craig Orr, George Chaffee, and Glen Joe. Thank you to the City of Coquitlam also for their printing and computer support services.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B: Hydrotechnical Assessment
    Sheep Paddocks Trail Alignment Analysis APPENDIX B: HYDROTECHNICAL ASSESSMENT LEES+Associates -112- 30 Gostick Place | North Vancouver, BC V7M 3G3 | 604.980.6011 | www.nhcweb.com 300217 15 August 2013 Lees + Associates Landscape Architects #509 – 318 Homer Street Vancouver, BC V6B 2V2 Attention: Nalon Smith Dear Mr. Smith: Subject: Sheep Paddocks Trail Alignment – Phase 1 Hydrotechnical Assessment Preliminary Report 1 INTRODUCTION Metro Vancouver wishes to upgrade the Sheep Paddocks Trail between Pitt River Road and Mundy Creek in Colony Farm Regional Park on the west side of the Coquitlam River. The trail is to accommodate pedestrian and bicycle traffic and be built to withstand at least a 1 in 10 year flood. The project will be completed in three phases: 1. Phase 1 – Route Selection 2. Phase 2 – Detailed Design 3. Phase 3 – Construction and Post-Construction This letter report provides hydrotechnical input for Phase 1 – Route Selection. Currently, a narrow footpath runs along the top of a berm on the right bank of the river. The trail suffered erosion damage in 2007 and was subsequently closed to the public but is still unofficially in use. Potential future routes include both an inland and river option, as well as combinations of the two. To investigate the feasibility of the different options and help identify the most appropriate trail alignment from a hydrotechnical perspective, NHC was retained to undertake the following Phase I scope of work: • Participate in three meetings. • Attend a site visit. • Estimate different return period river flows and comment on local drainage requirements. • Simulate flood levels and velocities corresponding to the different flows.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Draft Experiences with Inter Basin Water
    REVISED DRAFT EXPERIENCES WITH INTER BASIN WATER TRANSFERS FOR IRRIGATION, DRAINAGE AND FLOOD MANAGEMENT ICID TASK FORCE ON INTER BASIN WATER TRANSFERS Edited by Jancy Vijayan and Bart Schultz August 2007 International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage (ICID) 48 Nyaya Marg, Chanakyapuri New Delhi 110 021 INDIA Tel: (91-11) 26116837; 26115679; 24679532; Fax: (91-11) 26115962 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.icid.org 1 Foreword FOREWORD Inter Basin Water Transfers (IBWT) are in operation at a quite substantial scale, especially in several developed and emerging countries. In these countries and to a certain extent in some least developed countries there is a substantial interest to develop new IBWTs. IBWTs are being applied or developed not only for irrigated agriculture and hydropower, but also for municipal and industrial water supply, flood management, flow augmentation (increasing flow within a certain river reach or canal for a certain purpose), and in a few cases for navigation, mining, recreation, drainage, wildlife, pollution control, log transport, or estuary improvement. Debates on the pros and cons of such transfers are on going at National and International level. New ideas and concepts on the viabilities and constraints of IBWTs are being presented and deliberated in various fora. In light of this the Central Office of the International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage (ICID) has attempted a compilation covering the existing and proposed IBWT schemes all over the world, to the extent of data availability. The first version of the compilation was presented on the occasion of the 54th International Executive Council Meeting of ICID in Montpellier, France, 14 - 19 September 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Building of the Coquitlam River and Port Moody Trails Researched and Written by Ralph Drew, Belcarra, BC, June 2010; Updated Dec 2012 and Dec 2013
    Early Trail Building in the New Colony of British Columbia — John Hall’s Building of the Coquitlam River and Port Moody Trails Researched and written by Ralph Drew, Belcarra, BC, June 2010; updated Dec 2012 and Dec 2013. A recent “find” of colonial correspondence in the British Columbia Archives tells a story about the construction of the Coquitlam River and Port Moody Trails between 1862 and 1864 by pioneer settler John Hall. (In 1870 Hall pre-empted 160 acres of Crown Land on Indian Arm and became Belcarra’s first European settler.) The correspondence involves a veritable “who’s who” of people in the administration in the young ‘Colony of British Columbia’. This historic account serves to highlight one of the many challenges faced by our pioneers during the period of colonial settlement in British Columbia. Sir James Douglas When the Fraser River Gold Rush began in the spring of 1858, there were only about 250 to 300 Europeans living in the Fraser Valley. The gold rush brought on the order of 30,000 miners flocking to the area in the quest for riches, many of whom came north from the California gold fields. As a result, the British Colonial office declared a new Crown colony on the mainland called ‘British Columbia’ and appointed Sir James Douglas as the first Governor. (1) The colony was first proclaimed at Fort Langley on 19th November, 1858, but in early 1859 the capital was moved to the planned settlement called ‘New Westminster’, Sir James Douglas strategically located on the northern banks of the Fraser River.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers at Risk: the Status of Environmental Flows in Canada
    Rivers at Risk: The Status of Environmental Flows in Canada Prepared by: Becky Swainson, MA Research Consultant Prepared for: WWF-Canada Freshwater Program Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge the valuable contributions of the river advocates and professionals from across Canada who lent their time and insights to this assessment. Also, special thanks to Brian Richter, Oliver Brandes, Tim Morris, David Schindler, Tom Le Quesne and Allan Locke for their thoughtful reviews. i Rivers at Risk Acronyms BC British Columbia CBM Coalbed methane CEMA Cumulative Effects Management Association COSEWIC Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada CRI Canadian Rivers Institute DFO Fisheries and Oceans Canada EBF Ecosystem base flow IBA Important Bird Area IFN Instream flow needs IJC International Joint Commission IPP Independent Power Producer GRCA Grand River Conservation Authority LWR Low Water Response MOE Ministry of Environment (Ontario) MNR Ministry of Natural Resources (Ontario) MRBB Mackenzie River Basin Board MW Megawatt NB New Brunswick NGO Non-governmental organization NWT Northwest Territories P2FC Phase 2 Framework Committee PTTW Permit to Take Water QC Quebec RAP Remedial Action Plan SSRB South Saskatchewan River Basin UNESCO United Nations Environmental, Scientific and Cultural Organization US United States WCO Water Conservation Objectives ii Rivers at Risk Contents Rivers at Risk: The Status of Environmental Flows in Canada CONTENTS Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • JOURNEYS of INDIGENEITY This Years Editions of the Canoe Are Dedicated to Truth and Reconciliaton
    THE CANOE SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 43 (COQUITLAM), No. 75 (MISSION), No 78 (FRASER-CASCADE) DECEMBER 2017 JOURNEYS OF INDIGENEITY This years editions of The Canoe are dedicated to Truth and Reconciliaton. The Canoe is committed to amplifying Indigenous voice(s) and stories in their various forms on the tradtional territories to which the boundries of School District #43 (Coquitlam) and #75 (Mission) reside and is excited to welcome School District #78 (Fraser Cascade) to the project. Three districts remain still, as Surrey School District is commit- ted elsewhere for this round of editions. We thank them for the stories they shared. Fraser Cascade is, of course, home to Hope B.C and for anyone who immigrated from the Praries can attest: it wasn’t quite until you hit Hope where you’re like: “Wow, I’m really not in Alberta anymore” or Saskatchewan or what have you. Exotic lush forests and waterfalls, it was like suddenly being transported to the backseat of a jeep in Jurrasic Park. We appreciate the efforts of Superintendent Karen Nelson and Aboriginal Education Coordinator Rod Peters and Stan Watchorn, Principal Kent Elementary, for making this partnership possible and The Canoe looks forward to the stories that inhabit their territory. The Canoe appreciates all the support received from it’s contributors and it will be with the collective effort for our own truth that will no doubt provide the path for reconciliation. Pulling Together! Kirk Gummow, Managing Editor, The Canoe. The Fraser-Cascade School District currently operates nine schools in six communities, from Harrison Hot Springs and Agassiz in the west to Boston Bar in the east.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Ames, Kenneth M. and Herbert D.G. Maschner 1999 Peoples of BIBLIOGRAPHY the Northwest Coast: Their Archaeology and Prehistory. Thames and Hudson, London. Abbas, Rizwaan 2014 Monitoring of Bell-hole Tests at Amoss, Pamela T. 1993 Hair of the Dog: Unravelling Pre-contact Archaeological Site DhRs-1 (Marpole Midden), Vancouver, BC. Coast Salish Social Stratification. In American Indian Linguistics Report on file, British Columbia Archaeology Branch, Victoria. and Ethnography in Honor of Lawrence C. Thompson, edited by Acheson, Steven 2009 Marpole Archaeological Site (DhRs-1) Anthony Mattina and Timothy Montler, pp. 3-35. University of Management Plan—A Proposal. Report on file, British Columbia Montana Occasional Papers No. 10, Missoula. Archaeology Branch, Victoria. Andrefsky, William, Jr. 2005 Lithics: Macroscopic Approaches to Acheson, S. and S. Riley 1976 Gulf of Georgia Archaeological Analysis (2nd edition). Cambridge University Press, New York. Survey: Powell River and Sechelt Regional Districts. Report on Angelbeck, Bill 2015 Survey and Excavation of Kwoiek Creek, file, British Columbia Archaeology Branch, Victoria. British Columbia. Report in preparation by Arrowstone Acheson, S. and S. Riley 1977 An Archaeological Resource Archaeology for Kanaka Bar Indian Band, and Innergex Inventory of the Northeast Gulf of Georgia Region. Report on file, Renewable Energy, Longueuil, Québec. British Columbia Archaeology Branch, Victoria. Angelbeck, Bill and Colin Grier 2012 Anarchism and the Adachi, Ken 1976 The Enemy That Never Was. McClelland & Archaeology of Anarchic Societies: Resistance to Centralization in Stewart, Toronto, Ontario. the Coast Salish Region of the Pacific Northwest Coast. Current Anthropology 53(5):547-587. Adams, Amanda 2003 Visions Cast on Stone: A Stylistic Analysis of the Petroglyphs of Gabriola Island, B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • GVRD Board Meeting- June 28, 2006- Agenda
    June 15, 2006 NOTICE TO THE GREATER VANCOUVER REGIONAL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS You are requested to attend a Regular Meeting of the Greater Vancouver Regional District (GVRD) Board of Directors on Wednesday, June 28, 2006 at 1:30 p.m. in the 2nd Floor Boardroom, 4330 Kingsway, Burnaby, British Columbia. A G E N D A 1. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA 1.1 June 28, 2006 Regular Meeting Agenda Staff Recommendation: That the GVRD Board adopt the agenda for the GVRD Board regular meeting scheduled for June 28, 2006 as circulated. 2. ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES 2.1 May 24, 2006 Special Meeting Minutes Staff Recommendation: That the GVRD Board adopt the minutes for the GVRD Board special meeting held May 24, 2006 as circulated. 2.2 May 26, 2006 Regular Meeting Minutes Staff Recommendation: That the GVRD Board adopt the minutes for the GVRD Board regular meeting held May 26, 2006 as circulated. 3. DELEGATIONS No delegations presented. 4. PARKS REPORTS 4.1 Pacific Parklands Foundation – Funding and Support Parks Committee Recommendation: That the GVRD Board: a) receive this report as information on activities of the Pacific Parkland Foundation, and; b) request staff develop a proposed multi-year funding program of cash contribution and in-kind support for the Pacific Parklands Foundation as part of GVRD 2007 budget considerations, and that the proposed multi- year funding program be linked to the Pacific Parkland Foundations multi- year business plan. 5. AGRICULTURE REPORTS 5.1 Agriculture Land Protection Agriculture Committee Recommendation: WHEREAS the
    [Show full text]
  • Extreme Archaeology: the Resiilts of Investigations at High Elevation Regions in the Northwest
    Extreme Archaeology: The Resiilts of Investigations at High Elevation Regions in the Northwest. by Rudy Reimer BA, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C. 1997 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFLMENT OF TKE REQUIREhdENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Archaeology @Rudy Reimer 2000 Simon Fraser University August 2ûûû Ail Rights Rese~ved.This work may not be reproduced in whole in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. uisitions and Acquisitions et '3B' iographic Senrices senfices bibfkgraphiques The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accord6 une licence non exclusive licence aliowiag the exclusive mettant A la National Liiof Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, lom, distribute or seli reproduire, prêter, distriiuer ou copies of ibis thesis in microfonn, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous papa or electronic formats. la finme de microfiche/fbn, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts hmit Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwjse de ceîie-ci ne doivent être imprimes reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. Review of ethnographie and ment archaeological studies suggest that past human use ofhigh elevation subalpine and alpine environments in northwestem North America was more intense than is currently believed. Archaeological survey high in coastai and interior mountain ranges resulted in iocating 21 archaeological sites ranging in age between 7,500-1,500 BP.
    [Show full text]
  • An Archaeological Examination of House Architecture and Territoriality in the Salish Sea Region Over Five Millennia
    Territory, Tenure, and Territoriality Among the Ancestral Coast Salish of SW British Columbia and NW Washington State by Chris Springer M.A., Simon Fraser University, 2009 B.A., Simon Fraser University, 2006 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Archaeology Faculty of Environment © Chris Springer 2018 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Fall 2018 Copyright in this work rests with the author. Please ensure that any reproduction or re-use is done in accordance with the relevant national copyright legislation. Approval Name: Chris Springer Degree: Doctor of Philosophy (Archaeology) Territory, Tenure, and Territoriality Among the Title: Ancestral Coast Salish of SW British Columbia and NW Washington State Examining Committee: Chair: Jon Driver Professor Dana Lepofsky Senior Supervisor Professor Michael Blake Supervisor Professor Department of Anthropology University of British Columbia Ross Jamieson Supervisor Associate Professor Christina Giovas Internal Examiner Assistant Professor Elizabeth A. Sobel External Examiner Professor Department of Sociology and Anthropology Missouri State University Date Defended/Approved: September 26, 2018 ii Abstract Archaeological studies of territory, tenure, and territoriality seek to understand how past claims and access to land and resources were expressed across landscapes and through time. The foci of such studies include the spatial and temporal patterning of settlements, dwellings, conspicuous burials, monumental constructions, rock art, defensive features, and resources. In line with this research, this dissertation integrates ethnohistoric and archaeological data in three case studies that investigate the roles of house forms, the distribution of local and nonlocal obsidian, and the positioning of defensive networks in communicating territorial and tenurial interests among the ancestral Coast Salish of southwestern British Columbia and northwestern Washington state.
    [Show full text]
  • Forbidden Treasure
    Forbidden Treasure One Man’s Quest for Slumach’s Lost Gold Mine of Pitt Lake by Mike Boileau From Bill Barlee’s version of Jackson’s letter: “… I climbed up to the top of a sharp ridge and looked down into the canyon or valley about one mile and a half long, and what struck me as singular, it appeared to have no outlet for the little creek that flowed at the bottom. Afterwards I found that the creek entered a ---- ------ and was lost. After some difficulty I found my way down to the creek. The water was almost white, the formation for the most part had been slate and granite, but there I found a kind of schist and slate formation. Now comes the interesting part. I had only a small prospecting pan but I found colors at once right on the surface, and such colors they were. I knew then that I had struck it right at last. In going up stream I came to a place where the bedrock was bare, and there, you could hardly believe me, the bedrock was yellow with gold. Some of the nuggets was as big as walnuts and there were many chunks carrying quartz. After sizing it up, I saw there was millions stowed around in the little cracks. On account of the weight I buried part of the gold at the foot of a large tent shaped rock facing the creek. You cant miss it. There is a mark cut out in it….” Forbidden Treasure Memory is a fickle thing, and I was glad that I could rely on my personal notes of some 20 years ago to write these reminiscences.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genesis of the Coquitlam Lake Conservation Reserve
    Coquitlam Lake The Genesis of the Coquitlam Lake Conservation Reserve: A much praised policy of the Dominion Government for the A Footnote on Early Conservation Policy management of its western lands was the creation of forest reserves. The establishment of a forest reserve did not withhold the included forests in the Lower Fraser Basin from logging. Rather, it held out the promise of scientific management of the selected forests on a sustained yield basis. Several forest reserves Ronald A. Shearer were established in the Railway Belt of British Columbia between 1888 Department of Economics and 1906 but none in the lower Fraser basin, the region with the major marketable forest resources. An apparent exception to this statement John T. Sproul was the Coquitlam Conservation Reserve established on the western Fisheries Centre edge of the railway belt between 1904 and 1910. As we will note below, although the forests of the Coquitlam Lake drainage basin were “reserved”, this was not a result of the forest reserve policy. However, the April 1996 process by which the Coquitlam Reserve was created had much in The University of British Columbia common with the process by which forest reserves were established elsewhere in the railway belt and this process provides insights into the political economy of resource management in the lower Fraser basin while it was under federal administration. Moreover, the creation of the This is a working paper of the Economic History Coquitlam Conservation Reserve, which became an important part of the component of the Lower Fraser Basin Eco- watershed for the Vancouver metropolitan area, is an interesting episode Research Project, funded by a grant from the Tri-Council Secretariat through the Westwater in the history of the lower mainland of British Columbia.
    [Show full text]