British Columbia Electric Railway Company
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Transportation
OCTOBER 2009 SITELINESLandscape Architecture in British Columbia TransporTaTion Canada Line Opening | Road Rights of Way Receives ASLA Award | Vancouver Green Streets | Multi-modal Pathway Design 2009Ad_Habitat_Evos:Layout 1 9/30/09 4:42 PM Page 1 Inspired Artistic Gyroscopic EvosTM is the unique playsystem where imagination rules and feet never need to touch the ground. Its artistic, Exclusive BC Representative spherical design and play components create a fresh shape in play that’s positively “gyroscopic.” With Evos, kids build agility and confidence as they balance and counterbalance their bodies against the forces of gravity. Exclusively from Landscape Structures; leading the evolution of play. See Evos in action at playlsi.com/go/Evos. 2 SITELINES BC Society Of Landscape Architects Editor’s note By Brett Hitchins 110 - 355 Burrard st. Vancouver, BC V6C 2G8 604.682.5610 604.681.3394 T F Since August 17th, traveling from downtown Vancouver to YVR International Airport W www.bcsla.org E [email protected] www.sitelines.org has been much easier. The $1.9 billion Canada Line SkyTrain project is up and running and critics are clamoring to offer their opinions on the successes and shortcomings of the rapid transit. Canada Line is the poster child of recent transportation projects, but it is one of many projects in progress across the province that are focusing on two objectives: (1) Improving the PresidenT Katherine Dunster PresidenT Elect Mark van der Zalm efficiency and safety of our daily commutes and the transport of goods, and (2) bolstering lo- Past PresidenT David Thompson cal economies through improved access to business and industrial areas. -
Early Vancouver Volume Four
Early Vancouver Volume Four By: Major J.S. Matthews, V.D. 2011 Edition (Originally Published 1944) Narrative of Pioneers of Vancouver, BC Collected During 1935-1939. Supplemental to Volumes One, Two and Three collected in 1931-1934. About the 2011 Edition The 2011 edition is a transcription of the original work collected and published by Major Matthews. Handwritten marginalia and corrections Matthews made to his text over the years have been incorporated and some typographical errors have been corrected, but no other editorial work has been undertaken. The edition and its online presentation was produced by the City of Vancouver Archives to celebrate the 125th anniversary of the City's founding. The project was made possible by funding from the Vancouver Historical Society. Copyright Statement © 2011 City of Vancouver. Any or all of Early Vancouver may be used without restriction as to the nature or purpose of the use, even if that use is for commercial purposes. You may copy, distribute, adapt and transmit the work. It is required that a link or attribution be made to the City of Vancouver. Reproductions High resolution versions of any graphic items in Early Vancouver are available. A fee may apply. Citing Information When referencing the 2011 edition of Early Vancouver, please cite the page number that appears at the bottom of the page in the PDF version only, not the page number indicated by your PDF reader. Here are samples of how to cite this source: Footnote or Endnote Reference: Major James Skitt Matthews, Early Vancouver, Vol. 4 (Vancouver: City of Vancouver, 2011), 33. -
Technical Memo 4 Proposed Bicycle Monitoring Program
TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES.................................................................... 3 2.1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FROM PRECEDING TECHNICAL MEMORANDA ..................................................................... 3 2.2 GUIDING PRINCIPLES .................................................................................................................................. 4 3.0 NEEDS DEFINITION ......................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 APPLICATIONS ........................................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 CURRENT SITUATION AND GAP ANALYSIS ......................................................................................................... 8 3.3 NEEDS ANALYSIS ...................................................................................................................................... 10 3.4 SUMMARY OF NEEDS ................................................................................................................................ 13 4.0 ASSESSMENT INDICATORS & EVALUATION FRAMEWORK ........................................................... -
3,549 Mw Yt 0.810 Mw
Canada Wind Farms As of October 2010 Current Installed Capacity: 3,549 MW YT 0.810 MW NL 54.7 MW BC 656 MW 103.5 MW AB 104 MW SK MB 171.2 MW ON 663 MW 1,298 MW QC PE 164 MW NB 195 MW NS Courtesy of 138 MW Alberta COMPLETED WIND FARMS Installed Capacity Project Project Power Turbine # Project Name (in MW) Developer Owner Purchaser Manufacturer Year Online 1 Cardston Municipal District Magrath 30 Suncor, Enbridge, EHN Suncor, Enbridge, EHN Suncor, Enbridge, EHN GE Wind 2004 McBride Lake 75.24 Enmax, TransAlta Wind Enmax, TransAlta Wind Enmax, TransAlta Wind Vestas 2007 McBride Lake East 0.6 TransAlta Wind TransAlta Wind TransAlta Wind Vestas 2001 Soderglen Wind Farm 70.5 Nexen/Canadian Hydro Nexen/Canadian Hydro Nexen/Canadian Hydro GE 2006 Developers, Inc. Developers, Inc. Developers, Inc. Waterton Wind Turbines 3.78 TransAlta Wind TransAlta Wind TransAlta Wind Vestas 1998 2 Pincher Municipal District Castle River Wind Farm 0.6 TransAlta Wind TransAlta Wind TransAlta Wind Vestas 1997 Castle River Wind Farm 9.9 TransAlta Wind TransAlta Wind TransAlta Wind Vestas 2000 Castle River Wind Farm 29.04 TransAlta Wind TransAlta Wind TransAlta Wind Vestas 2001 Cowley Ridge 21.4 Canadian Hydro Canadian Hydro Canadian Hydro Kenetech 1993/1994 Developers, Inc. Developers, Inc. Developers, Inc. Cowley Ridge North Wind Farm 19.5 Canadian Hydro Canadian Hydro Canadian Hydro Nordex 2001 Developers, Inc. Developers, Inc. Developers, Inc. Lundbreck 0.6 Lundbreck Developments Lundbreck Developments Lundbreck Developments Enercon 2001 Joint Venture A Joint Venture A Joint Venture A Kettles Hill Phase I 9 Enmax Enmax Enmax Vestas 2006 Kettles Hill Phase II 54 Enmax Enmax Enmax Vestas 2007 Old Man River Project 3.6 Alberta Wind Energy Corp. -
Walterdale Bridge Replacement and Approach Roads Evaluation
Walterdale Bridge Replacement Concept Planning Study and Approach Roads Evaluation Final Report April 2011 4.0 BRIDGE CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT 4.1 INTRODUCTION The new Walterdale Bridge will replace the existing three-span structural steel truss bridge that was constructed in 1912 to 1913 to carry two lanes of roadway traffic and a street railway across the North Saskatchewan River in Edmonton, Alberta. The existing bridge currently carries two lanes of northbound traffic, along with pedestrians and bicyclists on sidewalks on both sides, and a number of utilities across the river. The terms of reference for the "Walterdale Bridge Replacement and Approach Roads Evaluation" indicate that the existing structure should be replaced with a functional signature bridge that will form an attractive entrance to downtown Edmonton. The replacement is to have an innovative urban design complementing the "West Rossdale Urban Design Plan", and respecting the aboriginal burial grounds on the north bank of the river. In Phase 1 of the "Walterdale Bridge Replacement and Approach Roads Evaluation", we compared signature extradosed, arch and cable-stayed bridge replacement alternatives to a more conventional girder bridge alternative. We developed the conceptual bridge designs for the Base Road Option. The geometry and appearance of the structure will be similar for the East and West Side Road Options. We assumed that the replacement bridge will carry three lanes of northbound traffic and possibly one lane of southbound traffic, in addition to pedestrians, bicyclists and utilities across the river. As the study progressed in Phase 2, a through-arch bridge was selected as the preferred alternative. -
Ski Resorts (Canada)
SKI RESORTS (CANADA) Resource MAP LINK [email protected] ALBERTA • WinSport's Canada Olympic Park (1988 Winter Olympics • Canmore Nordic Centre (1988 Winter Olympics) • Canyon Ski Area - Red Deer • Castle Mountain Resort - Pincher Creek • Drumheller Valley Ski Club • Eastlink Park - Whitecourt, Alberta • Edmonton Ski Club • Fairview Ski Hill - Fairview • Fortress Mountain Resort - Kananaskis Country, Alberta between Calgary and Banff • Hidden Valley Ski Area - near Medicine Hat, located in the Cypress Hills Interprovincial Park in south-eastern Alberta • Innisfail Ski Hill - in Innisfail • Kinosoo Ridge Ski Resort - Cold Lake • Lake Louise Mountain Resort - Lake Louise in Banff National Park • Little Smokey Ski Area - Falher, Alberta • Marmot Basin - Jasper • Misery Mountain, Alberta - Peace River • Mount Norquay ski resort - Banff • Nakiska (1988 Winter Olympics) • Nitehawk Ski Area - Grande Prairie • Pass Powderkeg - Blairmore • Rabbit Hill Snow Resort - Leduc • Silver Summit - Edson • Snow Valley Ski Club - city of Edmonton • Sunridge Ski Area - city of Edmonton • Sunshine Village - Banff • Tawatinaw Valley Ski Club - Tawatinaw, Alberta • Valley Ski Club - Alliance, Alberta • Vista Ridge - in Fort McMurray • Whispering Pines ski resort - Worsley British Columbia Page 1 of 8 SKI RESORTS (CANADA) Resource MAP LINK [email protected] • HELI SKIING OPERATORS: • Bearpaw Heli • Bella Coola Heli Sports[2] • CMH Heli-Skiing & Summer Adventures[3] • Crescent Spur Heli[4] • Eagle Pass Heli[5] • Great Canadian Heliskiing[6] • James Orr Heliski[7] • Kingfisher Heli[8] • Last Frontier Heliskiing[9] • Mica Heliskiing Guides[10] • Mike Wiegele Helicopter Skiing[11] • Northern Escape Heli-skiing[12] • Powder Mountain Whistler • Purcell Heli[13] • RK Heliski[14] • Selkirk Tangiers Heli[15] • Silvertip Lodge Heli[16] • Skeena Heli[17] • Snowwater Heli[18] • Stellar Heliskiing[19] • Tyax Lodge & Heliskiing [20] • Whistler Heli[21] • White Wilderness Heli[22] • Apex Mountain Resort, Penticton • Bear Mountain Ski Hill, Dawson Creek • Big Bam Ski Hill, Fort St. -
BMN Hike: Grouse Mountain Via Mackay Creek
BMN HIKE REPORT Grouse Mountain via Mackay Creek (May 16, 2015) by Mark Johnston On the Mackay Creek Trail. Chloe Tu photo. At the start of the May long weekend, five us of gathered for a return trip to the North Shore mountains, this time a hike up much visited Grouse Mountain but by a route that sees relatively little traffic. Our leaders, Rich and Janet, were familiar with the trail; for the rest of us it would be a new path. It was a cloudy day and as the ceiling was fairly low, we wondered whether, higher up the mountain, we would have any views. Our plan was to hike the Mackay Creek Trail to Simic’s Trail and then proceed along the Cut ski run until we reached “The Peak of Vancouver.” Parking at the base of the Skyride, we headed east along the power line right-of-way toward Mackay Creek. As we walked, we took notice of dame’s rocket and buttercup in bloom and enjoyed occasional views of Greater Vancouver. As it would turn out, these would be our only distant views until our descent via the aerial tramway three hours later. Just past the bridge over West Mackay Creek, we left the power line, climbed up the gravelly bank and entered the forest. Initially we stayed quite close to the rocky creek bed, but soon our trail veered east, away from the creek, and after awhile we came within earshot of the East Mackay tributary. Never approaching as closely to this branch, we stayed high on the ridge between tributaries and gained elevation steadily with a minimum of switchbacks. -
Soil-Structure Interaction Considerations in Seismic Design for Deep Bridge Foundations
Missouri University of Science and Technology Scholars' Mine International Conference on Case Histories in (2008) - Sixth International Conference on Case Geotechnical Engineering Histories in Geotechnical Engineering 13 Aug 2008, 5:15pm - 6:45pm Soil-Structure Interaction Considerations in Seismic Design for Deep Bridge Foundations Dan Yang Buckland & Taylor Ltd., North Vancouver, BC, Canada Ernest Naesgaard Naesgaard Geotechnical Ltd., Bowen Island, BC, Canada Peter M. Byrne University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icchge Part of the Geotechnical Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Yang, Dan; Naesgaard, Ernest; and Byrne, Peter M., "Soil-Structure Interaction Considerations in Seismic Design for Deep Bridge Foundations" (2008). International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering. 29. https://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icchge/6icchge/session_01/29 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. This Article - Conference proceedings is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars' Mine. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering by an authorized administrator of Scholars' Mine. This work is protected by U. S. Copyright Law. Unauthorized use including reproduction for redistribution requires the permission of the copyright holder. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION CONSIDERATIONS IN SEISMIC DESIGN FOR DEEP BRIDGE FOUNDATIONS Dan Yang Ernest Naesgaard Peter M. Byrne Buckland & Taylor Ltd. Naesgaard Geotechnical Ltd. Dept. of Civil Engineering 101-788 Harbourside Dr Bowen Island, BC Univ. of British Columbia North Vancouver, BC, Canada Canada Vancouver, BC, Canada ABSTRACT Soil-structure interaction (SSI) effects when evaluating seismic response of deep bridge foundations to earthquake loading are complex and sometimes intriguing. -
Recco® Detectors Worldwide
RECCO® DETECTORS WORLDWIDE ANDORRA Krimml, Salzburg Aflenz, ÖBRD Steiermark Krippenstein/Obertraun, Aigen im Ennstal, ÖBRD Steiermark Arcalis Oberösterreich Alpbach, ÖBRD Tirol Arinsal Kössen, Tirol Althofen-Hemmaland, ÖBRD Grau Roig Lech, Tirol Kärnten Pas de la Casa Leogang, Salzburg Altausee, ÖBRD Steiermark Soldeu Loser-Sandling, Steiermark Altenmarkt, ÖBRD Salzburg Mayrhofen (Zillertal), Tirol Axams, ÖBRD Tirol HELICOPTER BASES & SAR Mellau, Vorarlberg Bad Hofgastein, ÖBRD Salzburg BOMBERS Murau/Kreischberg, Steiermark Bischofshofen, ÖBRD Salzburg Andorra La Vella Mölltaler Gletscher, Kärnten Bludenz, ÖBRD Vorarlberg Nassfeld-Hermagor, Kärnten Eisenerz, ÖBRD Steiermark ARGENTINA Nauders am Reschenpass, Tirol Flachau, ÖBRD Salzburg Bariloche Nordkette Innsbruck, Tirol Fragant, ÖBRD Kärnten La Hoya Obergurgl/Hochgurgl, Tirol Fulpmes/Schlick, ÖBRD Tirol Las Lenas Pitztaler Gletscher-Riffelsee, Tirol Fusch, ÖBRD Salzburg Penitentes Planneralm, Steiermark Galtür, ÖBRD Tirol Präbichl, Steiermark Gaschurn, ÖBRD Vorarlberg AUSTRALIA Rauris, Salzburg Gesäuse, Admont, ÖBRD Steiermark Riesneralm, Steiermark Golling, ÖBRD Salzburg Mount Hotham, Victoria Saalbach-Hinterglemm, Salzburg Gries/Sellrain, ÖBRD Tirol Scheffau-Wilder Kaiser, Tirol Gröbming, ÖBRD Steiermark Schiarena Präbichl, Steiermark Heiligenblut, ÖBRD Kärnten AUSTRIA Schladming, Steiermark Judenburg, ÖBRD Steiermark Aberg Maria Alm, Salzburg Schoppernau, Vorarlberg Kaltenbach Hochzillertal, ÖBRD Tirol Achenkirch Christlum, Tirol Schönberg-Lachtal, Steiermark Kaprun, ÖBRD Salzburg -
Rivers at Risk: the Status of Environmental Flows in Canada
Rivers at Risk: The Status of Environmental Flows in Canada Prepared by: Becky Swainson, MA Research Consultant Prepared for: WWF-Canada Freshwater Program Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge the valuable contributions of the river advocates and professionals from across Canada who lent their time and insights to this assessment. Also, special thanks to Brian Richter, Oliver Brandes, Tim Morris, David Schindler, Tom Le Quesne and Allan Locke for their thoughtful reviews. i Rivers at Risk Acronyms BC British Columbia CBM Coalbed methane CEMA Cumulative Effects Management Association COSEWIC Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada CRI Canadian Rivers Institute DFO Fisheries and Oceans Canada EBF Ecosystem base flow IBA Important Bird Area IFN Instream flow needs IJC International Joint Commission IPP Independent Power Producer GRCA Grand River Conservation Authority LWR Low Water Response MOE Ministry of Environment (Ontario) MNR Ministry of Natural Resources (Ontario) MRBB Mackenzie River Basin Board MW Megawatt NB New Brunswick NGO Non-governmental organization NWT Northwest Territories P2FC Phase 2 Framework Committee PTTW Permit to Take Water QC Quebec RAP Remedial Action Plan SSRB South Saskatchewan River Basin UNESCO United Nations Environmental, Scientific and Cultural Organization US United States WCO Water Conservation Objectives ii Rivers at Risk Contents Rivers at Risk: The Status of Environmental Flows in Canada CONTENTS Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... -
Vancouver Nach Whistler Vancouver Nach Whistler
VANCOUVER NACH WHISTLER VANCOUVER NACH WHISTLER km km km High- Haupt- Teil- Neben- way strecke strecke strecke 0 Vancouver 1/99 Mount Seymour Provincial Park Exit 22 1 Lynn Canyon Exit 19 1 Grouse Mountain Exit 14 1/99 Capilano Suspension Bridge Exit 14 1/99 Cypress Provincial Park Exit 8 1/99 20 20 Vancouver Nord - Horseshoe Bay 99 Fähranleger von / nach Nanaimo und von / nach Langdale (Sunshine Coast) 33 33 Lions Bay 99 38 38 Porteau Cove Provincial Park 99 43 43 BC Museum of Mining 99 45 45 Murren Provincial Park 99 52 52 Shannon Falls Provincial Park 99 60 60 Stawamus Chief Provincial Park 99 64 64 Squamish 99 66 66 Brackendale 99 70 70 Diamond Head - Garibaldi Provincial Park 99 77 77 Alice Lake Provincial Park 99 101 101 Garibaldi Lake - Garibaldi Provincial Park 99 111 111 Brandywine Falls Provincial Park 99 116 116 Cheakamus Lake - Garibaldi Provincial Park 99 122 122 Whistler 99 32 - LESEPROBE VANCOUVER NACH WHISTLER Unsere Route startet in der wunderschö- am Beginn oder am Ende der Reise Zeit nen Stadt Vancouver am Pazifik nördlich ein. Wir empfehlen Ihnen, 1 bis 2 Hotel- von Downtown. Sie erreichen den Start- übernachtungen vor der Übernahme des punkt der Route (Highway 1/99) entwe- Wohnmobils oder am Ende der Reise nach der über die Lions Gate Bridge (Highway Abgabe des Wohnmobils vorzusehen. Die 99, Exit 13) oder über die Second Nar- Stadterkundung ist mit öffentlichen Ver- rows Bridge (Highway 1). kehrsmitteln problemlos möglich. Nähe- Sicherlich wollen Sie sich in der Stadt res dazu finden Sie in der Beschreibung gerne die wichtigsten Sehenswürdig- von Vancouver. -
Abstracts, Posters and Program
Gold and Silver Deposits in Colorado Symposium Abstracts, posters And program Berthoud Hall, Colorado School of Mines Golden, Colorado July 20-24, 2017 GOLD AND SILVER DEPOSITS IN COLORADO SYMPOSIUM July 20-24, 2017 ABSTRACTS, POSTERS AND PROGRAM Principle Editors: Lewis C. Kleinhans Mary L. Little Peter J. Modreski Sponsors: Colorado School of Mines Geology Museum Denver Regional Geologists’ Society Friends of the Colorado School of Mines Geology Museum Friends of Mineralogy – Colorado Chapter Front Cover: Breckenridge wire gold specimen (photo credit Jeff Scovil). Cripple Creek Open Pit Mine panorama, March 10, 2017 (photo credit Mary Little). Design by Lew Kleinhans. Back Cover: The Mineral Industry Timeline – Exploration (old gold panner); Discovery (Cresson "Vug" from Cresson Mine, Cripple Creek); Development (Cripple Creek Open Pit Mine); Production (gold bullion refined from AngloGold Ashanti Cripple Creek dore and used to produce the gold leaf that was applied to the top of the Colorado Capital Building. Design by Lew Kleinhans and Jim Paschis. Berthoud Hall, Colorado School of Mines Golden, Colorado July 20-24, 2017 Symposium Planning Committee Members: Peter J. Modreski Michael L. Smith Steve Zahony Lewis C. Kleinhans Mary L. Little Bruce Geller Jim Paschis Amber Brenzikofer Ken Kucera L.J.Karr Additional thanks to: Bill Rehrig and Jim Piper. Acknowledgements: Far too many contributors participated in the making of this symposium than can be mentioned here. Notwithstanding, the Planning Committee would like to acknowledge and express appreciation for endorsements from the Colorado Geological Survey, the Colorado Mining Association, the Colorado Department of Natural Resources and the Colorado Division of Mine Safety and Reclamation.