Corporate Number Eaves West Valley Resident Complaints
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Santa Clara County Certified Farmers' Markets Tuesday Wednesday
Santa Clara County Certified Farmers’ Markets Schedule during Covid-19 (changes in red) Tuesday Stanford CFM Temporarily closed due to Covid-19 Operator: West Coast FMA Tressider Memorial Union (White Plaza) 59 Lagunita Drive, Stanford, CA 95035 Wednesday Almaden Via Valiente Plaza Farmers’ Market Start date TBD 9 a.m. – 1 p.m Operator: Tomas Pascual Almaden Via Valiente Plaza Shopping Center 6946 Almaden Express Way., San Jose, CA 95120 . Cambrian Park Farmers' Market May 5 – September 27 4 p.m. - 8 p.m. Operator: Urban Village FMA Cambrian Park Plaza Camden Ave. & Union Ave., San Jose, CA 95124 Evergreen Farmers’ Market January 8 – December 30 9 a.m. – 1 p.m. Operator: Pacific Coast FMA 4055 Evergreen Village Square, San Jose, CA 95121 Revised 4/6/2021 Princeton Plaza CFM Year-round 9 a.m.—1 p.m Operator: Hector Mora, Certified Producer 1375 Blossom Hill Rd., San Jose, CA 95118 Santana Row CFM May 19 – September 29 4 p.m. – 8 p.m. Operator: California FMA Santana Row between Olin Ave. and Olsen Dr., San Jose, 95128 Saratoga, Prince of Peace, CFM Year-round 2 p.m. – 6 p.m. Operator: Jose Reynoso, Certified Producer 12770 Saratoga Ave., Saratoga, CA 95070 San Jose Government Center CFM Temporarily closed due to Covid-19 Operator: West Coast FMA 70 West Hedding Street San Jose California 95110 Santa Clara Valley Medical Center CFM Temporarily closed due to Covid-19 Operator: Pacific Coast FMA 751 South Bascom Avenue, San Jose, CA 95051 VA Palo Alto Health Care CFM Temporarily closed due to Covid-19 Operator: Pacific Coast FMA 3801 Miranda Ave., Palo Alto, CA 94304 Revised 4/6/2021 Thursday Los Altos CFM April 29th-Sept. -
SAN JOSE Food Works FOOD SYSTEM CONDITIONS & STRATEGIES for a MORE VIBRANT RESILIENT CITY
SAN JOSE Food Works FOOD SYSTEM CONDITIONS & STRATEGIES FOR A MORE VIBRANT RESILIENT CITY NOV 2016 Food Works SAN JOSE Food Works ■ contents Executive Summary 2 Farmers’ markets 94 Background and Introduction 23 Food E-Commerce Sector 96 San Jose Food System Today 25 Food and Agriculture IT 98 Economic Overview 26 Food and Agriculture R & D 101 Geographic Overview 41 Best Practices 102 San Jose Food Sector Actors and Activities 47 Summary of Findings, Opportunities, 116 County and Regional Context 52 and Recommendations Food Supply Chain Sectors 59 APPENDICES Production 60 A: Preliminary Assessment of a San Jose 127 Market District/ Wholesale Food Market Distribution 69 B: Citywide Goals and Strategies 147 Processing 74 C: Key Reports 153 Retail 81 D: Food Works Informants 156 Restaurants and Food Service 86 End Notes 157 Other Food Sectors 94 PRODUCED BY FUNDED BY Sustainable Agriculture Education (SAGE) John S. and James L. Knight Foundation www.sagecenter.org 11th Hour Project in collaboration with San Jose Department of Housing BAE Urban Economics Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority www.bae1.com 1 San Jose Executive Summary What would San Jose look like if a robust local food system was one of the vital frameworks linking the city’s goals for economic development, community health, environmental stewardship, culture, and identity as the City’s population grows to 1.5 million people over the next 25 years? he Food Works report answers this question. The team engaged agencies, businesses, non- T profits and community groups over the past year in order to develop this roadmap for making San Jose a vibrant food city and a healthier, more resilient place. -
Thursday, April 6, 2017
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING Thursday, April 6, 2017 5:30 PM Board of Supervisors’ Chambers County Government Center 70 West Hedding Street San Jose, CA 95110 AGENDA To help you better understand, follow, and participate in the meeting, the following information is provided: . Persons wishing to address the Board of Directors on any item on the agenda or not on the agenda are requested to complete a blue card located at the public information table and hand it to the Board Secretary staff prior to the meeting or before the item is heard. Speakers will be called to address the Board when their agenda item(s) arise during the meeting and are asked to limit their comments to 2 minutes. The amount of time allocated to speakers may vary at the Chairperson's discretion depending on the number of speakers and length of the agenda. If presenting handout materials, please provide 25 copies to the Board Secretary for distribution to the Board of Directors. The Consent Agenda items may be voted on in one motion at the beginning of the meeting. The Board may also move regular agenda items on the consent agenda during Orders of the Day. If you wish to discuss any of these items, please request the item be removed from the Consent Agenda by notifying the Board Secretary staff or completing a blue card at the public information table prior to the meeting or prior to the Consent Agenda being heard. AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS Thursday, April 06, 2017 . Disclosure of Campaign Contributions to Board Members (Government Code Section 84308) In accordance with Government Code Section 84308, no VTA Board Member shall accept, solicit, or direct a contribution of more than $250 from any party, or his or her agent, or from any participant, or his or her agent, while a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use is pending before the agency. -
Urban Planning Area Strategies CHAPTER 5______
Urban Planning Area Strategies CHAPTER 5_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CHAPTER 5 Urban Planning Area Strategies This chapter describes the Planning Areas within the Service Level Objectives Urban Service Area and their future need for The City’s General Plan service level objective is neighborhood/community serving parkland, to provide 3.5 acres per 1,000 population of community centers, community gardens, dog parks, neighborhood/community serving parkland within skate parks, aquatic facilities, sports fields, trails, a reasonable walking distance. Of the 3.5 acres, a and improvements to regional parks. There are 15 minimum of 1.5 acres is to be City-owned Planning Areas as defined in the City’s General parkland and/or trails while public schools can Plan: Almaden, Alum Rock, Alviso, Berryessa, provide up to 2 acres of recreation school grounds, Calero, Cambrian/Pioneer, Central/Downtown, all of which are within a reasonable walking Coyote, Edenvale, Evergreen, North San José, San distance. Physical barriers, such as major arterials, Felipe, South San José, West Valley, and Willow creeks, rivers and architectural barriers, are seen as Glen. Calero, Coyote and San Felipe Planning impediments to this walking distance strategy, and Areas are outside of the Urban Service Area and, the plan attempts to mitigate such conditions. therefore, are not discussed in this report. In the Neighborhood parks, community parks, trails and Coyote Planning Area, only the northern industrial recreation school grounds are counted toward this portion has been approved by the City. No urban service level (excluding high schools without joint residential development will occur in the North and use agreements). -
2020-DEBS-Resource-Guide.Pdf
welcome Santa Clara County Social Services Agency Mission Statement: The mission of the Social Services Agency is to provide resources and opportunities in a contact us: culturally responsive manner in order to enhance the quality of life in our community by To submit new agency, update information, or delete agency, 1. Download: SCC Community Resource Guide Change protecting, educating, and empowering Request Form individuals and families. 2. Fill-in your information 3. Email to: [email protected] Visit Our Websites: disclaimer: County of Santa Clara The Santa Clara County Social Services Agency is providing this in- www.sccgov.org formation as a public service, reference to any service or organiza- tion does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation by Santa Clara County Social Services Agency Santa Clara County Social Services Agency. www.sccgov.org/sites/ssa/Pages/ssa.aspx Dept. of Employment and Benefit Services Santa Clara County Social Services Agency https://www.sccgov.org/sites/ssa/about_us/debs/ Pages/about_debs.aspx 333 W. Julian Street, San Jose, California 95110 2020 DEBS Resource Guide table of contents EMERGENCY AND HOMELESS ASSISTANCE Emergency Assistance Network (EAN) 02 City of San Jose List of Homeless Services 03 If you are seeking immediate help, Santa Clara County has a variety agencies that can help you. Call now and get help. HOSPITALS: Santa Clara Valley Medical Center If you think you or someone is having a medical or mental 751 S. Bascom Ave, San Jose, CA 95128 | Website: www.scvmc.org health emergency, call 911 or go to the nearest hospital. Phone: (408) 885-5000 | TTY: (408) 971-4068 Emergency Psychiatric Services (EPS) 871 Enborg Lane, San Jose, CA 95128 | Phone: (408) 885-6100 EMERGENCY SHELTERS, DOMESTIC, FAMILY & CHILD ABUSE: • 2-1-1 - for emergency and disaster services 30 O‘Connor Hospital 2105 Forest Ave, San Jose, CA 95128 | Website: och.sccgov.org • Adult Protective Service: 1-800-414-2002 22 Phone: (408) 947-2500 | TDD: (408) 947-2599 • Asian Americans for Comm Involvement: (408) 975-2739 31 St. -
Restaurant/Cafe Neighborhood Carry out Delivery Egiftcards Website 4Th
Restaurant/Cafe Neighborhood Carry Out Delivery eGiftcards Website 4th St Bowl Coffee Shop and Bar North San Jose Yes No https://www.4thstreetbowl.com/coffee.php 4th St Pizza Co Downtown Yes Yes http://www.4thstpizzaco.com/ 7 Stars Bar & Grill Rose Garden Yes https://www.7starsbar.com/ 85° C Bakery Cafe San Jose West San Jose Yes Yes No www.85cbakerycafe.com 85° C Bakery Cafe Waterford South San Jose Yes Yes No www.85cbakerycafe.com Academic Coffee Downtown Yes Yes https://www.academiccoffee.com/ Adelita's Taqueria and Restaurant Willow Glen Yes Yes https://adelitastaqueria.com/ Affinity Restaurant & Bar Downtown Yes No No https://www.hilton.com/en/hotels/sjcshhf-hilton-san-jose/dining/ Al Castello Ristorante Willow Glen Yes Yes http://www.alcastellorestaurant.com/AlCastelloRestaurant/Welcome.html Aloha Fresh Japantown Yes Yes No http://www.alohafreshpoke.com/ Amato Pizzeria Almaden Valley Yes Yes www.amatopizzeria.com Amber Indian Restaurant Santana Row Yes Yes https://www.amber-india.com/ Angelou’s Mexican Grill Downtown Yes No www.angelousmexicangrill.com Applebee's Cottle Road https://www.applebees.com/en/restaurants-san-jose-ca/5630-cottle-rd-78045 Applebee's Curtner South San Jose Yes Yes https://www.applebees.com/en/restaurants-san-jose-ca/51-curtner-ave-76030 Applebee's Saratoga West San Jose Yes Yes https://www.applebees.com/en/restaurants-san-jose-ca/555-saratoga-ave-95095 Araujo's Mexican Grill Evergreen Yes Yes http://araujosmexicangrill.com/ Asian Box North San Jose Yes https://www.asianbox.com/ Back A Yard Caribbean American -
West Valley College Vocational and Technical Advisory Committees. West Valley Junior Coll., Campbell, Calif
DO CU ME N T R E S UM E ED 025 233 JC 680 463 West Valley College Vocational and Technical Advisory Committees. West Valley Junior Coll., Campbell, Calif. Pub Date (681 Note- 40p. EDRS Price MF-$0.25 HC-$2.10 Descriptors- *Advisory Commitieer.,*Community Involvement, *JuniorColleges,*TechnicalEducation, *Vocational Education Identifiers- *California This brochure describeslunior college advisory committees as groupsof persons who represent industry and assist inorganizing curriculum, advise on material procurement, keep the college current on industry practices,coordinate programs with the community, assist in student selection, guide instructors,provide moral support and public relations, and procure instructors.Organization is described in terms of members' personal qualifications, selection andduties of chairmen, duties of college representatives, lines of communication, number and termsof members, and number of meetings. Functions and names of the incumbent members arelisted for committees on (1) Civil Engineering Technology, 11members, (2) Data Processing, 11 members, (3) Electronics, 13 members, (4) Food Services and RestaurantManagement, 17 members, (5) Institutional Foods, 15 members, (6) LawEnforcement, 8 members, (7) Licensed Vocational Nursing, 20 members, (8) Medical Assisting,12 members, (9) Real Estate, 17 members, (10) Technical Draftin", 13 members, (11)Technical Illustrating, 15 members. (12) Textile and Clothing, 8 members, (13) All CollegeAdvisory Committee, 39 members. (RM) PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGINATING 11.POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS WEST VALLEY COLLEGE STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY. ...itt,,,i.,..4 s F. i iltl, i ::::::.4.1:1.:::::"Is .f '. ..r.i.v.,..4/.... 1,,. 4 .',4 t....: ' .'. t . ..ttai . ri ot , ". ' . irik041' 3 5, 4.! ilttOrli' r ; .8 " riumicr_171' A 4 4.41,0 P44.4 r-T '-'11510114 e I .N111110._ lor r, NS: 4 1416t 1,1 2A.P' 411:4.64*,41P4%. -
Vallco Questions: What's Approved? How Did We Get Here? What Next?
Liang Chao, North Blaney 27 Vallco Questions: What's Approved? How Did We Get Here? What Next? Check out Cupertino.org/Vallco to find out what's approved as Tier 2 on 9/19 by the 3-2 vote of City Council. It includes - 1.75 million sqft office space (0.25 million sqft so-called amenity space) - 2,668 housing units - up to 120 feet for east of Wolfe and up to 150 feet for west of Wolfe, plus 12 feet rooftop cafe. (12-14 stories tall) - No Parks, except 6 acres of so-called open space, including concrete plaza or walkways. - 400,000 sqft retail space + 85,000 sqft community space. Q: How come the Council did not insist on a real ground-level park when the parkland requirement for 2668 units would be about 24 acres? Q: How come the Council agreed to almost 1/8 school benefit per unit? (more than 4 times of housing units while the donation to school is half of that in 2016) Q: How come the Council choose Tier 2, with double the amount of office space (worsening housing crisis), in exchange for benefits, which might be worth less than 1/10 of the increased value? Q: How come the Developer Agreement did not require the Developer to pay for the construction of the low- income units? With no delivery deadline, will the Developer wiggle out of such obligation all together? Q: How come none of the current tenants, theaters, ice rink, bowling alleys or gym are included in the plan? Q: How much it will cost the taxpayers to finish the interior of the empty-shell City Hall and empty-shell Performing Art center? How much it will cost the City to operate the 600-seat plus 200-seat center annually? How come there is only 150 parking stalls for 800 seats? Q: How come the Vallco plan allow developer to make more changes with only staff approval? Will we see a similar transformation as Main Street? (gym is gone. -
Ecological Data Collection and Analysis Conducted by Valley Water
Santa Clara County Five Watersheds Assessment: A SYNTHESIS OF Ecological Data Collection and Analysis Conducted by Valley Water Report prepared for the Santa Clara Valley Water District (Valley Water) Safe, Clean Water and Natural Flood Protection Program Ecological Data Collection and Analysis Project (Priority D5) SUBMITTED BY: San Francisco Estuary Institute AUTHORS: Sarah Lowe, Sarah Pearce, Micha Salomon, and Josh Collins • SFEI Douglas Titus • Valley Water Valley Water Agreement #A4077F (CAS# 4802) SFEI- ASC Project #4097 Task 005 SFEI Contribution #963 MARCH 2020 Acknowledgements: The Safe, Clean Water and Natural Flood Protection Program; Priority D, Project D5’s ambient stream condition surveys and watershed assessments were made possible by a collaborative effort of the Santa Clara Valley Water District (Valley Water) staff and its consultants: the San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI), EOA, HT Harvey & Associates, and Michael Baker International. Funding is from Valley Water’s Safe, Clean Water and Natural Flood Protection Program. The authors, who have been involved in the work since the beginning, would like to acknowledge Valley Water unit manager, Lisa Porcella and other staff who contributed significantly to the five watershed assessments conducted between 2010 and 2018: EOA’s Lucy Buchan co-led the Coyote Creek Watershed Assessment Pilot in 2010 with SFEI’s Letitia Grenier, and Valley Water’s Louisa Squires. Field staff who conducted the California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM) assessments under the guidance of Sarah Pearce included Jae Abel, Ed Drury, Janell Hillman, Nina Merrill, Melissa Moore, Terry Neudorf, Kristen O’Kane, Doug Padley, and David Salsbery from Valley Water; April Robinson and Aroon Melwani from SFEI. -
Santana West Redevelopment Project
First Amendment to the Draft Environmental Impact Report Santana West Redevelopment Project Prepared by the September 2016 PREFACE This document, together with the Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR), constitutes the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the Santana West Redevelopment project. The Draft EIR was circulated to affected public agencies and interested parties for a 45-day review period from June 24, 2016 to August 8, 2016. This volume consists of comments received by the City of San José (City), the Lead Agency on the Draft EIR, during the public review period, responses to those comments, and revisions to the text of the Draft EIR. In conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the FEIR provides objective information regarding the environmental consequences of the proposed project. The FEIR also examines mitigation measures and alternatives to the project intended to reduce or eliminate significant environmental impacts. The FEIR is intended to be used by the City and any Responsible Agencies in making decisions regarding the project. The CEQA Guidelines advise that, while the information in the FEIR does not control the agency’s ultimate discretion on the project, the agency must respond to each significant effect identified in the DEIR by making written findings for each of those significant effects. According to the State Public Resources Code (Section 21081), no public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an environmental impact report has been certified which identifies one or more significant effects on the environment that would occur if the project is approved or carried out unless both of the following occur: (a) The public agency makes one or more of the following findings with respect to each significant effect: (1) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which will mitigate or avoid the significant effect on the environment. -
Gavilan College – Coyote Campus Project
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GAVILAN COLLEGE – COYOTE CAMPUS PROJECT SCH No. 2007122006 FEBRUARY 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY..........................................................................................................................................iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................1 1.1 INTRODUCTION OVERVIEW ....................................................................................1 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION ..................................................................................................1 1.3 REFERENCE AVAILABILITY ....................................................................................1 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ...................................................................2 2.1 OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................2 2.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION.............................................................................................2 2.3 PROJECT OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................13 2.4 USES OF THE EIR.......................................................................................................13 2.5 CONSISTENCY WITH ADOPTED PLANS AND POLICIES ..................................14 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION ......................................18 3.1 LAND USE...................................................................................................................18 -
SANTANA ROW/VALLEY FAIR URBAN VILLAGE PLAN Adopted by City Council on August 8, 2017 Amended by City Council on January 14, 2020 Ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
SANTANA ROW/VALLEY FAIR URBAN VILLAGE PLAN Adopted by City Council on August 8, 2017 Amended by City Council on January 14, 2020 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PLANNING DIVISION Leila Hakimizadeh, Lead Project Manager Lesley Xavier, Supervising Planner Michael Brilliot, Division Manager DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Doug Moody, Associate Engineer Ramses Madou, Transportation Manager Jessica Zenk, Division Manager DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Karen Mack, Traffic Manager Brian Lee, Associate Engineer CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS Chappie Jones, District 1 Pierluigi Olivero (former council member), District 6 Dev Davis, District 6 CITY COUNCIL STAFF Jerad Ferguson, Chief of Staff Christina Pressman, Policy & Legislative Director Mary Anne Groen, Chief of Staff OTHER CITY STAFF Mary Rubin David McCormick Kathy LeVeque Adam Marcus CONSULTANTS Dyett & Bhatia Urban and Regional Planners (Lead Consultant) Bottomley Design & Planning Urban Field Studio Fehr & Peers Sollod Studio LLC WINCHESTER CORRIDOR ADVISORY GROUP Steve Landau, Mark Tiernan , Daphna Woolfe, Seth Bland, Pat Hall, Scot Vallee, Dave Johnsen, Erik Schoennauer, Sarah Moffat, Ric Orlandi, Paul Lipari , Andrea Chelemengos, Ken Kelly, Scott Bishop, Art Maurice, Angel Milano Santana Row/Valley Fair Urban Village Plan iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction...............................................................................................................1 1.2 Planning Area...........................................................................................................2