DOCSLIB.ORG

Gavilan College – Coyote Campus Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gavilan College – Coyote Campus Project DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GAVILAN COLLEGE – COYOTE CAMPUS PROJECT SCH No. 2007122006 FEBRUARY 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY..........................................................................................................................................iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................1 1.1 INTRODUCTION OVERVIEW ....................................................................................1 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION ..................................................................................................1 1.3 REFERENCE AVAILABILITY ....................................................................................1 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ...................................................................2 2.1 OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................2 2.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION.............................................................................................2 2.3 PROJECT OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................13 2.4 USES OF THE EIR.......................................................................................................13 2.5 CONSISTENCY WITH ADOPTED PLANS AND POLICIES ..................................14 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION ......................................18 3.1 LAND USE...................................................................................................................18 3.2 TRANSPORTATION...................................................................................................22 3.3 AIR QUALITY.............................................................................................................44 3.4 NOISE...........................................................................................................................56 3.5 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ......................................................................................63 3.6 GEOLOGY, SOILS AND SEISMICITY .....................................................................65 3.7 HYDROLOGY, DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY...........................................70 3.8 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ......................................................................................83 3.9 CULTURAL RESOURCES .........................................................................................99 3.10 VISUAL AND AESTHETIC RESOURCES .............................................................102 3.11 PUBLIC SERVICES ..................................................................................................107 3.12 WATER SUPPLY AND UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS...........................110 3.13 ENERGY RESOURCES ............................................................................................115 4.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS...................................................................................................120 5.0 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT ..........................................................142 5.1 NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE ................................................................................144 5.2 REDUCED SCALE ALTERNATIVE .......................................................................145 5.3 LOCATION ALTERNATIVE ...................................................................................146 5.4 ENVIRONMENTALLY SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVE............................................149 6.0 GROWTH INDUCING IMPACTS.......................................................................................151 7.0 SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS ......................................................................152 8.0 SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES..................................153 9.0 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................154 10.0 LEAD AGENCY AND CONSULTANTS............................................................................155 Coyote Campus Master Plan Draft EIR Gavilan Joint Community College District i February 2008 Table of Contents FIGURES Figure 1: Regional Map....................................................................................................................3 Figure 2: Vicinity Map .....................................................................................................................4 Figure 3: Aerial Map ........................................................................................................................5 Figure 4: Gavilan College District Boundary...................................................................................6 Figure 5: Conceptual Master Plan ....................................................................................................8 Figure 6: Cross-sections and Elevations...........................................................................................9 Figure 7: Phase I Conceptual Plan..................................................................................................12 Figure 8: Roadway Network...........................................................................................................23 Figure 9: Noise Measurement Locations........................................................................................58 Figure 10: Existing FEMA Floodplain.............................................................................................71 Figure 11: 100-Year Floodplain Work Map – Master Site Plan.......................................................74 Figure 12: 100-Year Floodplain Work Map – Phase 1.....................................................................75 Figure 13: Biotic Habitats.................................................................................................................84 Figure 14: Biological Impact Map....................................................................................................91 Figure 15: Existing and Proposed Utility Connections ..................................................................112 Figure 16: Cumulative Projects Location Map...............................................................................121 Figure 17: Alternative Site Locations.............................................................................................148 TABLES Table 1: Proposed Land Use Areas..............................................................................................2 Table 2 Building Square Footage................................................................................................7 Table 3: Signalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions Based on Delay ........................25 Table 4: Freeway Level of Service ............................................................................................26 Table 5: Existing Intersection Levels of Service .......................................................................26 Table 6: Mixed Flow-Lanes: Existing Freeway Segment Levels of Service.............................28 Table 7: Background Intersection Levels of Service .................................................................31 Table 8: Project Trip Generation Estimates ...............................................................................35 Table 9: Project Intersection Levels of Service (Without CVRP) .............................................36 Table 10: Project Intersection Levels of Service (With Partial CVRP).......................................37 Table 11: Project Intersection Levels of Service (With Full Buildout of CVRP)........................39 Table 12: Project Conditions Freeway Segment Levels of Service .............................................41 Table 13: Ambient Air Quality Standards....................................................................................45 Table 14: Major Criteria Pollutants..............................................................................................46 Table 15: Annual Number of Days Exceeding Ambient Air Quality Standards .........................49 Table 16: Existing Daily Project Emissions in Pounds Per Day..................................................51 Table 17: Predicted 8-Hour CO Concentrations with Project......................................................52 Table 18: Acreage Summary of On-Site Habitats........................................................................83 Table 19: List of Cumulative Projects........................................................................................120 Table 20: Cumulative Intersection Levels of Service ................................................................124 Table 21: Consistency of Project with Applicable State of California ......................................132 Climate Change Emission Reduction Strategies........................................................132 Table 22: Day-Night Average Noise Levels at Long-Term Measurement Sites .......................135 Table 23: Matrix Comparison of Project Alternative Impacts...................................................150 Coyote Campus Master Plan Draft EIR Gavilan Joint Community College District ii February 2008 Table of Contents PHOTOS Photo 1: View from Santa Teresa Hills looking east across the project site.. .............................103 Photo 2: View
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Santa Clara County Certified Farmers' Markets Tuesday Wednesday
    Santa Clara County Certified Farmers’ Markets Schedule during Covid-19 (changes in red) Tuesday Stanford CFM Temporarily closed due to Covid-19 Operator: West Coast FMA Tressider Memorial Union (White Plaza) 59 Lagunita Drive, Stanford, CA 95035 Wednesday Almaden Via Valiente Plaza Farmers’ Market Start date TBD 9 a.m. – 1 p.m Operator: Tomas Pascual Almaden Via Valiente Plaza Shopping Center 6946 Almaden Express Way., San Jose, CA 95120 . Cambrian Park Farmers' Market May 5 – September 27 4 p.m. - 8 p.m. Operator: Urban Village FMA Cambrian Park Plaza Camden Ave. & Union Ave., San Jose, CA 95124 Evergreen Farmers’ Market January 8 – December 30 9 a.m. – 1 p.m. Operator: Pacific Coast FMA 4055 Evergreen Village Square, San Jose, CA 95121 Revised 4/6/2021 Princeton Plaza CFM Year-round 9 a.m.—1 p.m Operator: Hector Mora, Certified Producer 1375 Blossom Hill Rd., San Jose, CA 95118 Santana Row CFM May 19 – September 29 4 p.m. – 8 p.m. Operator: California FMA Santana Row between Olin Ave. and Olsen Dr., San Jose, 95128 Saratoga, Prince of Peace, CFM Year-round 2 p.m. – 6 p.m. Operator: Jose Reynoso, Certified Producer 12770 Saratoga Ave., Saratoga, CA 95070 San Jose Government Center CFM Temporarily closed due to Covid-19 Operator: West Coast FMA 70 West Hedding Street San Jose California 95110 Santa Clara Valley Medical Center CFM Temporarily closed due to Covid-19 Operator: Pacific Coast FMA 751 South Bascom Avenue, San Jose, CA 95051 VA Palo Alto Health Care CFM Temporarily closed due to Covid-19 Operator: Pacific Coast FMA 3801 Miranda Ave., Palo Alto, CA 94304 Revised 4/6/2021 Thursday Los Altos CFM April 29th-Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • 1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California
    1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California Prepared for: Premia Capital, LLC 801 Hamilton Street Redwood City, CA Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. January 18, 2019 1180 MAIN STREET PROJECT, CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY AND EVALUATION REPORT, REDWOOD CITY, SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA This document entitled 1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California was prepared by Stantec Inc. (“Stantec”) for the account of Premia Capital, LLC (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document. Prepared by (signature) Joanne Grant, Archaeologist, MA, RPA Reviewed by (signature) John A. Nadolski, M.A. Approved
    [Show full text]
  • SAN JOSE Food Works FOOD SYSTEM CONDITIONS & STRATEGIES for a MORE VIBRANT RESILIENT CITY
    SAN JOSE Food Works FOOD SYSTEM CONDITIONS & STRATEGIES FOR A MORE VIBRANT RESILIENT CITY NOV 2016 Food Works SAN JOSE Food Works ■ contents Executive Summary 2 Farmers’ markets 94 Background and Introduction 23 Food E-Commerce Sector 96 San Jose Food System Today 25 Food and Agriculture IT 98 Economic Overview 26 Food and Agriculture R & D 101 Geographic Overview 41 Best Practices 102 San Jose Food Sector Actors and Activities 47 Summary of Findings, Opportunities, 116 County and Regional Context 52 and Recommendations Food Supply Chain Sectors 59 APPENDICES Production 60 A: Preliminary Assessment of a San Jose 127 Market District/ Wholesale Food Market Distribution 69 B: Citywide Goals and Strategies 147 Processing 74 C: Key Reports 153 Retail 81 D: Food Works Informants 156 Restaurants and Food Service 86 End Notes 157 Other Food Sectors 94 PRODUCED BY FUNDED BY Sustainable Agriculture Education (SAGE) John S. and James L. Knight Foundation www.sagecenter.org 11th Hour Project in collaboration with San Jose Department of Housing BAE Urban Economics Santa Clara Valley Open Space Authority www.bae1.com 1 San Jose Executive Summary What would San Jose look like if a robust local food system was one of the vital frameworks linking the city’s goals for economic development, community health, environmental stewardship, culture, and identity as the City’s population grows to 1.5 million people over the next 25 years? he Food Works report answers this question. The team engaged agencies, businesses, non- T profits and community groups over the past year in order to develop this roadmap for making San Jose a vibrant food city and a healthier, more resilient place.
    [Show full text]
  • Diocese of San Jose 2020 Directory
    Diocese of San Jose 2020 Directory 1150 North First Street, Suite 100 San Jose, California 95112 Phone (408) 983-0100 www.dsj.org updated 10/8/2020 1 2 Table of Contents Diocese Page 5 Chancery Office Page 15 Deaneries Page 29 Churches Page 43 Schools Page 163 Clergy & Religious Page 169 Organizations Page 205 Appendix 1 Page A-1 Appendix 2 Page A-15 3 4 Pope Francis Bishop of Rome Jorge Mario Bergoglio was born in Buenos Aires, Argentina's capital city, on December 17, 1936. He studied and received a master's degree in chemistry at the University of Buenos Aires, but later decided to become a Jesuit priest and studied at the Jesuit seminary of Villa Devoto. He studied liberal arts in Santiago, Chile, and in 1960 earned a degree in philosophy from the Catholic University of Buenos Aires. Between 1964 and 1965 he was a teacher of literature and psychology at Inmaculada High School in the province of Santa Fe, and in 1966 he taught the same courses at the prestigious Colegio del Salvador in Buenos Aires. In 1967, he returned to his theological studies and was ordained a priest on December 13, 1969. After his perpetual profession as a Jesuit in 1973, he became master of novices at the Seminary of Villa Barilari in San Miguel. Later that same year, he was elected superior of the Jesuit province of Argentina and Uruguay. In 1980, he returned to San Miguel as a teacher at the Jesuit school, a job rarely taken by a former provincial superior.
    [Show full text]
  • San Jose New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Projects
    San Jose New Construction & Proposed Multifamily Projects 1Q19 ID PROPERTY UNITS 132 1 Santa Clara Square 1,840 5 Flats at Cityline, The 198 Total Lease Up 2,038 10 1130 Kifer Road 520 11 Nuevo 537 15 Dean, The 583 20 Novo 204 21 Gateway Village 476 22 500 Ferguson Drive 394 131 24 Anton Mountain View 144 46 Total Under Construction 2,858 133 121 42 City Place Santa Clara 1,360 104 43 1250 Lakeside Drive 250 130 129 114 44 Atria 108 15 144 42 45 Flats at Cityline Phase II, The 94 123 24 142 107 46 North Bayshore 9,850 126 143 Total Planned 11,662 20 122 127 49 124 128 118 49 5150 El Camino Real 196 22 103 2232 - 2240 El Camino Real 151 43 106 104 2233 Calle Del Mundo 57 125 106 Intel Land 950 1 107 Kylli 100 117 5 108 Laguna Clara Phase II 407 125 525 Evelyn 471 10 11 109 Lawrence Square 701 126 759 West Middlefield 75 119 45 110 Mariani's Inn 392 127 Eaves Mountain View at Middlefield Phase II 341 116 112 Moonlite Lanes 158 128 Middlefield Crossing 100 114 Tasman East 50 129 San Antonio Road & California 116 1155 Aster Avenue 412 Street 632 117 311 South Mathilda Avenue 75 130 Shoreline Boulevard 203 118 370 San Aleso 63 131 2755 El Camino Real 60 109 120 119 403 South Mathilda Avenue 100 132 Light Tree 100 44 21 112 110 103 120 Butcher's Corner 153 133 Wilton Court 61 121 1255 Pear Avenue 650 142 1139 Karlstad Drive 250 122 1696 Villa Street 226 143 400 Logue 412 123 2700 West El Camino Real 211 144 Village Lake Redevelopment 716 108 124 355-415 East Middlefield 269 Total Prospective 8,742 2000 ft Source: Yardi Matrix LEGEND Lease-Up
    [Show full text]
  • Type of Services Current Conditions Soils, Geology, and Geologic Hazards Envision San José 2040 General Plan Update
    Type of Services Current Conditions Soils, Geology, and Geologic Hazards Envision San José 2040 General Plan Update Client David J. Powers & Associates Client Address 1885 The Alameda, Suite 204 San José, CA 95126 Project Number 118-13-2 Date March 20, 2009 Prepared Scott E. Fitinghoff, P.E., G.E. by Principal Geotechnical Engineer Philip A. Frame, C.E.G. Senior Engineering Geologist Laura C. Knutson, P.E., G.E. Principal Geotechnical Engineer Quality Assurance Reviewer Table of Contents SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 1 1.1 PURPOSE ......................................................................................................... 1 SECTION 2: SOILS AND GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS ..................................................... 1 2.1 GEOLOGIC OVERVIEW OF SAN JOSÉ ......................................................... 1 2.2 LANDSLIDES ................................................................................................... 2 2.3 WEAK/EXPANSIVE SOILS .............................................................................. 3 2.4 NATURALLY-OCCURRING ABESTOS (NOA) ............................................... 4 2.5 EROSION .......................................................................................................... 4 2.6 ARTIFICIAL FILL .............................................................................................. 4 2.7 GROUND SUBSIDENCE DUE TO GROUND WATER REMOVAL ................. 4 2.8 MINERAL RESOURCES
    [Show full text]
  • San Jose Storm Sewer System Annual Report FY 2015-2016 CONTENTS
    Attachment A SANCITY OF ffr JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY STORM SEWER SYSTEM ANNUAL REPORT FY 2015-2016 Installation of Large Trash Capture Device October 2016 City of San Jose Storm Sewer System Annual Report FY 2015-2016 CONTENTS . 1 1 I. HISTORY AND BACKGROUND 3 II. PROGRAM FUNDING 5 A. Adopted FY 2015-2016 CIP Budget Revenue 5 B. Adopted FY 2015-2016 CIP Budget Expenditures 5 C. Adopted FY 2015-2016 Operations and Maintenance Budget Expenditures 5 III. PROGRAM ACTIVITY 6 A. Storm Sewer Improvement Projects 6 B. Rehabilitation Projects 8 C. Existing Storm Pump Stations 9 D. Non-Construction Activities 10 E. System Management and Planning 10 1. Master Planning 10 a. Alviso and North San Jose Master Plan 10 b. Modeling for Flooding Areas 12 c. DOT Portable Pumping Operation for 2015-16 El Nino Season 15 d. Flow Monitoring 15 e. Modeling Coordination with Water District and Alameda County 15 f. Citywide Storm Drain System Master Plan Initial Results 16 2. Support Economic Development 23 3. Coordination with Santa Clara Valley Water District (District) 23 4. Neighborhood/Special Corridors 24 5. Rehabilitation of Pump Stations 24 6. Improving Annexation Areas 24 7. San Jose-Santa Clara Regional Wastewater Facility . 25 E. Sustainability/Green Vision 25 VI. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE 27 V. CONCLUSION 28 Storm Sewer System Annual Report - FY 2015-2016 2 I. HISTORY AND BACKGROUND The City of San Jose drains to two main water shed/drainage basin areas, Coyote Creek and Guadalupe River. Within the tributary areas to these watersheds, the majority of the City's storm sewer collection system benefits from the generally uniform topography of the Santa Clara Valley, allowing the majority of the water to be conveyed to the waterways using gravity lines with minimal use of pump stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Habitat Designation Stress to Obtain Essential Nutrients Or Currently Aware of Any Federal Lands Water
    Monday, October 16, 2000 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed Designation of Critical Habitat for the Bay Checkerspot Butterfly (Euphydryas editha bayensis); Proposed Rule VerDate 11<MAY>2000 18:45 Oct 13, 2000 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\16OCP2.SGM pfrm02 PsN: 16OCP2 61218 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 200 / Monday, October 16, 2000 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (3) You may hand-deliver comments threatened bay checkerspot as occurring to our Sacramento Fish and Wildlife in San Francisco Bay area counties, Fish and Wildlife Service Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, notably the Counties of San Mateo and 2800 Cottage Way, Suite W 2605, Santa Clara. 50 CFR Part 17 Sacramento, California 95825. The bay checkerspot formerly Public Hearing: We will hold the occurred around San Francisco Bay, RIN 1018±AH61 Newark hearing at the Hilton Newark/ from Twin Peaks and San Bruno Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Fremont, 39900 Balentine Drive, Mountain (west of the Bay) and Contra and Plants; Proposed Designation of Newark, California. Costa County (east of the Bay) south Critical Habitat for the Bay Document Availability: Comments through Santa Clara County. Before the Checkerspot Butterfly (Euphydryas and materials received, as well as introduction of invasive Eurasian editha bayensis) supporting documentation used in the grasses and other weeds in the 1700s, its preparation of this proposed rule, will distribution may have been wider AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, be available for public inspection, by (Service 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Strong Ground Motion
    The Lorna Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989-Strong Ground Motion ROGER D. BORCHERDT, Editor STRONG GROUND MOTION AND GROUND FAILURE Thomas L. Holzer, Coordinator U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1551-A UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Manuscript approved for publication, October 6, 1993 Text and illustrations edited by George A. Havach Library of Congress catalog-card No. 92-32287 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Map Distribution Box 25286, MS 306, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page A1 Strong-motion recordings ---................................. 9 By A. Gerald Brady and Anthony F. Shakal Effect of known three-dimensional crustal structure on the strong ground motion and estimated slip history of the earthquake ................................ 39 By Vernon F. Cormier and Wei-Jou Su Simulation of strong ground motion ....................... 53 By Jeffry L. Stevens and Steven M. Day Influence of near-surface geology on the direction of ground motion above a frequency of 1 Hz----------- 61 By John E. Vidale and Ornella Bonamassa Effect of critical reflections from the Moho on the attenuation of strong ground motion ------------------ 67 By Paul G. Somerville, Nancy F. Smith, and Robert W. Graves Influences of local geology on strong and weak ground motions recorded in the San Francisco Bay region and their implications for site-specific provisions ----------------- --------------- 77 By Roger D.
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Checkerspot Butterfly (Euphydryas Editha Bayensis) 5-Year
    Bay checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas editha bayensis) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office Sacramento, California August 2009 5-YEAR REVIEW Bay checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas editha bayensis) I. GENERAL INFORMATION Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species at least once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review). Based on the 5-year review, we recommend whether the species should be removed from the list of endangered and threatened species, be changed in status from endangered to threatened, or be changed in status from threatened to endangered. Our original listing of a species as endangered or threatened is based on the existence of threats attributable to one or more of the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act, and we must consider these same five factors in any subsequent consideration of reclassification or delisting of a species. In the 5-year review, we consider the best available scientific and commercial data on the species, and focus on new information available since the species was listed or last reviewed. If we recommend a change in listing status based on the results of the 5-year review, we must propose to do so through a separate rule-making process defined in the Act that includes public review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Clara County Tricolored Blackbird Nesting and Foraging Monitoring Project 2017-2018 Final Report
    Santa Clara County Tricolored Blackbird Nesting and Foraging Monitoring Project 2017-2018 Final Report Final Report Prepared for: California Department of Fish and Wildlife & Santa Clara Valley Habitat Agency Prepared by: Ryan Phillips, Andrew Bradshaw, Katie Smith and Claire Ackland Talon Ecological Research Group 421 N. 19th Street San Jose, California 95112 Contact: Ryan Phillips Email: [email protected] Prepared on: September 2019 ABSTRACT During 2017 and 2018, Talon Ecological Research Group (Talon) conducted a comprehensive survey of Tricolored Blackbirds (Agelaius tricolor) throughout Santa Clara County. Financial support for this project was provided by a Natural Community Conservation Program Local Assistance Grant with a matching grant from the Santa Clara Valley Habitat Agency. The goal of the project was to determine the breeding status of the species and better understand their local ecology. Tricolored blackbirds have declined at an alarming rate throughout their range. Recent surveys have shown an 80% decline over the past 90 years and a 63% decline between 2008 and 2014. Within the past 40 years, seven historical nesting colonies were recorded in Santa Clara County. Talon monitoring during the 2017 breeding season found only two of those seven sites had nesting Tricolored Blackbirds. This is a 71.4% decline of nesting colonies in Santa Clara County. This study found that 29 sites had adequate breeding habitat. However, only 4 of those 29 sites (9%) had Tricolored Blackbirds present. Two historic sites and one newly identified site (75% of occupied sites) successfully fledged young in 2017. Two nesting colonies were located on private property (Del Puerto Canyon Road and Highway 130 in San Antonio Valley) and one on public property (Cañada de Los Osos Ecological Reserve).
    [Show full text]
  • Restaurant/Cafe Neighborhood Carry out Delivery Egiftcards Website 4Th
    Restaurant/Cafe Neighborhood Carry Out Delivery eGiftcards Website 4th St Bowl Coffee Shop and Bar North San Jose Yes No https://www.4thstreetbowl.com/coffee.php 4th St Pizza Co Downtown Yes Yes http://www.4thstpizzaco.com/ 7 Stars Bar & Grill Rose Garden Yes https://www.7starsbar.com/ 85° C Bakery Cafe San Jose West San Jose Yes Yes No www.85cbakerycafe.com 85° C Bakery Cafe Waterford South San Jose Yes Yes No www.85cbakerycafe.com Academic Coffee Downtown Yes Yes https://www.academiccoffee.com/ Adelita's Taqueria and Restaurant Willow Glen Yes Yes https://adelitastaqueria.com/ Affinity Restaurant & Bar Downtown Yes No No https://www.hilton.com/en/hotels/sjcshhf-hilton-san-jose/dining/ Al Castello Ristorante Willow Glen Yes Yes http://www.alcastellorestaurant.com/AlCastelloRestaurant/Welcome.html Aloha Fresh Japantown Yes Yes No http://www.alohafreshpoke.com/ Amato Pizzeria Almaden Valley Yes Yes www.amatopizzeria.com Amber Indian Restaurant Santana Row Yes Yes https://www.amber-india.com/ Angelou’s Mexican Grill Downtown Yes No www.angelousmexicangrill.com Applebee's Cottle Road https://www.applebees.com/en/restaurants-san-jose-ca/5630-cottle-rd-78045 Applebee's Curtner South San Jose Yes Yes https://www.applebees.com/en/restaurants-san-jose-ca/51-curtner-ave-76030 Applebee's Saratoga West San Jose Yes Yes https://www.applebees.com/en/restaurants-san-jose-ca/555-saratoga-ave-95095 Araujo's Mexican Grill Evergreen Yes Yes http://araujosmexicangrill.com/ Asian Box North San Jose Yes https://www.asianbox.com/ Back A Yard Caribbean American
    [Show full text]