DOCSLIB.ORG

2007 Federal Register, 72 FR 48178; Centralized Library: U.S. Fish And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2007 Federal Register, 72 FR 48178; Centralized Library: U.S. Fish And Wednesday, August 22, 2007 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for the Bay Checkerspot Butterfly (Euphydryas editha bayensis); Proposed Rule VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:26 Aug 21, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\22AUP2.SGM 22AUP2 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS 48178 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 22, 2007 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: impacts resulting from the proposed Field Supervisor, Sacramento Fish and designation and, in particular, any Fish and Wildlife Service Wildlife Office, 2800 Cottage Way, impacts on small entities. Room W–2605, Sacramento, CA 95825; (9) Whether our approach to 50 CFR Part 17 telephone 916–414–6600; facsimile designating critical habitat could be RIN 1018–AV24 916–414–6712. Persons who use a improved or modified in any way to telecommunications device for the deaf provide for greater public participation Endangered and Threatened Wildlife (TDD) may call the Federal Information and understanding, or to assist us in and Plants; Designation of Critical Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. accommodating public concerns and Habitat for the Bay Checkerspot SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: comments. Butterfly (Euphydryas editha bayensis) (10) Specific comments regarding Public Comments Solicited occupancy and habitat quality of the AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, We intend that any final action proposed Pulgas Ridge Unit 2. Interior. resulting from this proposal to revise the (11) The relative benefits of ACTION: Proposed rule. critical habitat designation for the bay designation or exclusion of any lands checkerspot butterfly will be as accurate from proposed revised critical habitat SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and and as effective as possible. Therefore, such as Habitat Conservation Plans Wildlife Service (Service), propose to we request comments or suggestions (HCPs), Safe Harbor Agreements (SHA), revise currently designated critical from the public, other concerned or other areas that have management habitat for the bay checkerspot butterfly governmental agencies, the scientific plans in place that provide for bay (Euphydryas editha bayensis) under the community, industry, or any other checkerspot butterfly conservation. We Endangered Species Act of 1973, as interested party on this proposed rule. especially seek specific comments amended (Act). In total, approximately We particularly seek comments regarding the potential exclusion of 19,746 acres (ac) (7,990 hectares (ha)) concerning: areas within the final San Bruno fall within the boundaries of the (1) The reasons why we should or Mountain HCP (proposed Unit 1), and proposed revised critical habitat should not designate habitat as ‘‘critical areas within the planned Stanford HCP designation. The proposed revision to habitat’’ under section 4 of the Act (16 (proposed Unit 4), and the Santa Clara critical habitat is located in San Mateo U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), including whether County HCP (proposed Units 5–12). and Santa Clara Counties, California. there are areas we previously (12) Specific comments regarding DATES: We will accept comments from designated, but are not proposing for population sizes of the bay checkerspot all interested parties until October 22, revised designation here, that should be butterfly within those areas proposed 2007. We must receive requests for designated as critical habitat. for designation as revised critical public hearings, in writing, at the (2) Specific information on the habitat. address shown in the ADDRESSES section amount and distribution of bay (13) Specific documentation regarding by October 9, 2007. checkerspot butterfly habitat. the use of water sources by the bay ADDRESSES: If you wish to comment on (3) Specific information whether the checkerspot butterfly, particularly to this proposed rule, you may submit features we have proposed as essential support or refute our proposed primary your comments and materials for the conservation of the species constituent element of water features concerning this proposal by any one of (Primary Constituent Elements) are (Primary Constituent Element 4), and several methods: adequate, and if not, what alternatives whether water sources are essential for 1. You may mail or hand-deliver should be considered (see also item the conservation of the subspecies. written comments and information to (13)). You may submit your comments and Susan Moore, Field Supervisor, U.S. (4) The reason why any areas that materials concerning this proposal by Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento were occupied at the time of listing and any one of several methods (see Fish and Wildlife Office, 2800 Cottage that contain the features that are ADDRESSES). If you use e-mail to submit Way, Room W–2605, Sacramento, CA essential for the conservation of the your comments, please include ‘‘Attn: 95825. species should or should not be [species]’’ in your e-mail subject header, 2. You may send comments by included in the designation. preferably with, your name and return electronic mail (e-mail) to (5) The reason why any areas that address in the body of your message. If [email protected]. Please see the Public were not occupied at the listing may be you do not receive a confirmation from Comments Solicited section below for essential to the conservation of the the system that we have received your file format and other information about species, and why such areas should or e-mail, contact us directly by calling our electronic filing. should not be designated as critical Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office at 3. You may fax your comments to the habitat. 916–414–6600. Please note that we must attention of Susan Moore, Field (6) Specific information on dispersal receive comments by the date specified Supervisor at 916–414–6712. areas important for habitat connectivity, in the DATES section in order to consider 4. You may go to the Federal in particular areas between Units 1 and them in our final determination and that Rulemaking Portal: http:// 2 and between Unit 4 and the Santa the e-mail address [email protected] www.regulations.gov. Follow the Clara County Units, their role in the will be closed out at the termination of instructions for submitting comments. conservation and recovery of the the public comment period. Comments and materials received, as species, and reasons why such areas Before including your address, phone well as supporting documentation used should or should not be included in the number, e-mail address, or other in the preparation of this proposed rule, critical habitat designation. personal identifying information in your will be available for public inspection, (7) Land use designations and current comment, you should be aware that by appointment, during normal business or planned activities in the subject areas your entire comment—including your hours at the Sacramento Fish and and their possible impacts on proposed personal identifying information—may Wildlife Office, 2800 Cottage Way, revised critical habitat. be made publicly available at any time. Room W–2605, Sacramento, CA 95825 (8) Any foreseeable economic, While you may ask us to withhold your (telephone 916–414–6600). national security, or other potential personal identifying information from VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:26 Aug 21, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\22AUP2.SGM 22AUP2 sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 22, 2007 / Proposed Rules 48179 public review, we cannot guarantee that Distribution and Population Trends increased from approximately 200,000 we will be able to do so. The population size of the bay in 2000 to 400,000 in 2004, but then Comments and materials we receive, checkerspot butterfly is primarily declined to 45,000 in 2006 (Weiss 2006, as well as supporting documentation we determined by the survival rate of p. 1). Larval estimates from Silver Creek used in preparing this proposed rule, prediapause larvae (Singer 1972, p. 77; Hills (2001 unit 12), also on Coyote Weiss et al. 1988, p. 1486). Prediapause will be available for public inspection, Ridge, increased from 75,000 in 1992 to larva experience mortality rates by appointment, during normal business 128,000 in 1993, but then fell to an upwards of 95 percent (Murphy 1988, p. hours at the Sacramento Fish and estimated 58,000 in 1994 following the 46; Weiss et al. 1988, p. 1487; Cushman Wildlife Office, 2800 Cottage Way, removal of grazing from portions of the et al. 1994, p. 198; Murphy et al. 2004, Room W–2605, Sacramento, CA 95825 area (Weiss 1996, p. 93; Weiss 1999, p. p. 26). Larval survivorship is dependent (telephone 916–414–6600). 1480), and no larvae or adults were upon the timing of host plant observed in 1998 (Weiss 1999, p. 1480). Background senescence, which in turn is dependent Annual surveys at Silver Creek Hills on environmental conditions such as It is our intent to discuss only those since the construction of a residential rainfall. Rainfall in the San Francisco subdivision and reintroduction of topics directly relevant to the Bay area is known to vary dramatically designation of critical habitat in this grazing over portions of the area in (Weiss et al. 1988, p. 1495). The further 2000–2001, showed a slight increase proposed rule. For more information on a particular location is from another, the the bay checkerspot butterfly, refer to from a low of 11 adults in 2001 to 51 greater the likelihood each will receive in 2005 (WRA 2006, p. 10). Forty adult the listing rule and previous dramatically different rainfall, so plants determination of critical habitat bay checkerspot butterflies were in areas that experience the same observed in the Silver Creek Hills area published in the Federal Register on environmental conditions (i.e., those in September 18, 1987 (52 FR 35366) and in 2006, but no larvae were observed close proximity and on similar (WRA 2006, p.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California
    1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California Prepared for: Premia Capital, LLC 801 Hamilton Street Redwood City, CA Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. January 18, 2019 1180 MAIN STREET PROJECT, CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY AND EVALUATION REPORT, REDWOOD CITY, SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA This document entitled 1180 Main Street Project, Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report, Redwood City, San Mateo County, California was prepared by Stantec Inc. (“Stantec”) for the account of Premia Capital, LLC (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document. Prepared by (signature) Joanne Grant, Archaeologist, MA, RPA Reviewed by (signature) John A. Nadolski, M.A. Approved
    [Show full text]
  • Diocese of San Jose 2020 Directory
    Diocese of San Jose 2020 Directory 1150 North First Street, Suite 100 San Jose, California 95112 Phone (408) 983-0100 www.dsj.org updated 10/8/2020 1 2 Table of Contents Diocese Page 5 Chancery Office Page 15 Deaneries Page 29 Churches Page 43 Schools Page 163 Clergy & Religious Page 169 Organizations Page 205 Appendix 1 Page A-1 Appendix 2 Page A-15 3 4 Pope Francis Bishop of Rome Jorge Mario Bergoglio was born in Buenos Aires, Argentina's capital city, on December 17, 1936. He studied and received a master's degree in chemistry at the University of Buenos Aires, but later decided to become a Jesuit priest and studied at the Jesuit seminary of Villa Devoto. He studied liberal arts in Santiago, Chile, and in 1960 earned a degree in philosophy from the Catholic University of Buenos Aires. Between 1964 and 1965 he was a teacher of literature and psychology at Inmaculada High School in the province of Santa Fe, and in 1966 he taught the same courses at the prestigious Colegio del Salvador in Buenos Aires. In 1967, he returned to his theological studies and was ordained a priest on December 13, 1969. After his perpetual profession as a Jesuit in 1973, he became master of novices at the Seminary of Villa Barilari in San Miguel. Later that same year, he was elected superior of the Jesuit province of Argentina and Uruguay. In 1980, he returned to San Miguel as a teacher at the Jesuit school, a job rarely taken by a former provincial superior.
    [Show full text]
  • Type of Services Current Conditions Soils, Geology, and Geologic Hazards Envision San José 2040 General Plan Update
    Type of Services Current Conditions Soils, Geology, and Geologic Hazards Envision San José 2040 General Plan Update Client David J. Powers & Associates Client Address 1885 The Alameda, Suite 204 San José, CA 95126 Project Number 118-13-2 Date March 20, 2009 Prepared Scott E. Fitinghoff, P.E., G.E. by Principal Geotechnical Engineer Philip A. Frame, C.E.G. Senior Engineering Geologist Laura C. Knutson, P.E., G.E. Principal Geotechnical Engineer Quality Assurance Reviewer Table of Contents SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 1 1.1 PURPOSE ......................................................................................................... 1 SECTION 2: SOILS AND GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS ..................................................... 1 2.1 GEOLOGIC OVERVIEW OF SAN JOSÉ ......................................................... 1 2.2 LANDSLIDES ................................................................................................... 2 2.3 WEAK/EXPANSIVE SOILS .............................................................................. 3 2.4 NATURALLY-OCCURRING ABESTOS (NOA) ............................................... 4 2.5 EROSION .......................................................................................................... 4 2.6 ARTIFICIAL FILL .............................................................................................. 4 2.7 GROUND SUBSIDENCE DUE TO GROUND WATER REMOVAL ................. 4 2.8 MINERAL RESOURCES
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Habitat Designation Stress to Obtain Essential Nutrients Or Currently Aware of Any Federal Lands Water
    Monday, October 16, 2000 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed Designation of Critical Habitat for the Bay Checkerspot Butterfly (Euphydryas editha bayensis); Proposed Rule VerDate 11<MAY>2000 18:45 Oct 13, 2000 Jkt 194001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\16OCP2.SGM pfrm02 PsN: 16OCP2 61218 Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 200 / Monday, October 16, 2000 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (3) You may hand-deliver comments threatened bay checkerspot as occurring to our Sacramento Fish and Wildlife in San Francisco Bay area counties, Fish and Wildlife Service Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, notably the Counties of San Mateo and 2800 Cottage Way, Suite W 2605, Santa Clara. 50 CFR Part 17 Sacramento, California 95825. The bay checkerspot formerly Public Hearing: We will hold the occurred around San Francisco Bay, RIN 1018±AH61 Newark hearing at the Hilton Newark/ from Twin Peaks and San Bruno Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Fremont, 39900 Balentine Drive, Mountain (west of the Bay) and Contra and Plants; Proposed Designation of Newark, California. Costa County (east of the Bay) south Critical Habitat for the Bay Document Availability: Comments through Santa Clara County. Before the Checkerspot Butterfly (Euphydryas and materials received, as well as introduction of invasive Eurasian editha bayensis) supporting documentation used in the grasses and other weeds in the 1700s, its preparation of this proposed rule, will distribution may have been wider AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, be available for public inspection, by (Service 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Strong Ground Motion
    The Lorna Prieta, California, Earthquake of October 17, 1989-Strong Ground Motion ROGER D. BORCHERDT, Editor STRONG GROUND MOTION AND GROUND FAILURE Thomas L. Holzer, Coordinator U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1551-A UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1994 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Manuscript approved for publication, October 6, 1993 Text and illustrations edited by George A. Havach Library of Congress catalog-card No. 92-32287 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Map Distribution Box 25286, MS 306, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page A1 Strong-motion recordings ---................................. 9 By A. Gerald Brady and Anthony F. Shakal Effect of known three-dimensional crustal structure on the strong ground motion and estimated slip history of the earthquake ................................ 39 By Vernon F. Cormier and Wei-Jou Su Simulation of strong ground motion ....................... 53 By Jeffry L. Stevens and Steven M. Day Influence of near-surface geology on the direction of ground motion above a frequency of 1 Hz----------- 61 By John E. Vidale and Ornella Bonamassa Effect of critical reflections from the Moho on the attenuation of strong ground motion ------------------ 67 By Paul G. Somerville, Nancy F. Smith, and Robert W. Graves Influences of local geology on strong and weak ground motions recorded in the San Francisco Bay region and their implications for site-specific provisions ----------------- --------------- 77 By Roger D.
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Checkerspot Butterfly (Euphydryas Editha Bayensis) 5-Year
    Bay checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas editha bayensis) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office Sacramento, California August 2009 5-YEAR REVIEW Bay checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas editha bayensis) I. GENERAL INFORMATION Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species at least once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review). Based on the 5-year review, we recommend whether the species should be removed from the list of endangered and threatened species, be changed in status from endangered to threatened, or be changed in status from threatened to endangered. Our original listing of a species as endangered or threatened is based on the existence of threats attributable to one or more of the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act, and we must consider these same five factors in any subsequent consideration of reclassification or delisting of a species. In the 5-year review, we consider the best available scientific and commercial data on the species, and focus on new information available since the species was listed or last reviewed. If we recommend a change in listing status based on the results of the 5-year review, we must propose to do so through a separate rule-making process defined in the Act that includes public review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Miscellaneous Field Studies MF-2373, Explanation
    MISCELLANEOUS FIELD STUDIES MAP MF–2373 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Sheet 6 of 8 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Pamphlet accompanies map CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS Sierra Azul Block and related rocks in Santa Teresa Hills 20 Strike and dip of volcanic flow or of dikes and sills 1 Ball denotes that facing direction of flow is known QUATERNARY TO LATE TERTIARY UNITS Tme Shale and sandstone of Highland Way (lower Miocene to lower Eocene) MILPITAS CALAVERAS MT. DAY EYLAR MTN. MT. COPPER MTN. PATTERSON CROWS from sedimentary or volcanic structures RES. BOARDMAN LANDING 10 md gp pp af Sandstone and shale of Loma Chiquita Ridge (Eocene)Consists of: Inclined Figure 2B. References to sources of data used in compilation (see fig. 2A). Vertical Holocene Tlm Siliceous mudstone 1. Clark, J.C., field work, 1961. Qhf 2. Dibblee, T.W., Jr., Brabb, E.E., and Clark, J.C., 1978, Preliminary geologic map of the Qhb Qhl Qhfp Qhc Shear foliation or cleavage Qal Qls Qt Tls Sandstone and mudstone SAN JOSE SAN JOSE LICK ISABEL MT. STAKES WILCOX ORESTIMBA NEWMAN Laurel quadrangle, Santa Cruz and Santa Clara Counties, California: U.S. 10 Qad Qpf QUATERNARY Inclined WEST EAST OBSERVATORY VALLEY RIDGE PEAK Geological Survey Open-file Map 78-84, scale 1:24,000. Qa Qmt Qof Qaf Qoa Tcm Mottled mudstone and sandstone of Mount Chual (lower Eocene)Locally includes: Vertical 3. Burford, R.O., 1961, Geology of the Glenwood Basin area, Santa Cruz Mountains, California: Stanford, California, Stanford University graduate report, 30 p., scale Pleistocene 10 1:24,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Envision San José 2040 General Plan Update Biological Resources Existing Conditions Report
    ENVISION SAN JOSÉ 2040 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT Prepared by H. T. HARVEY & ASSOCIATES Prepared for David J. Powers and Associates 1885 The Alameda, Suite 204 San José, California 95126 20 March 2009 Project No. 2942-01 983 University Avenue, Building D Los Gatos, CA 95032 Ph: 408.458.3200 F: 408.458.3210 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of San José, located in the northern portion of Santa Clara County, California, initiated an update of the City’s General Plan with a horizon year of 2040 known as Envision San José 2040. This existing conditions report describes the physical and biological conditions currently present within the area encompassed by the City of San José’s Urban Growth Boundary (“Study Area”) and will inform the process of updating the General Plan. BACKGROUND RESEARCH This report was based on a review of the current General Plan, San José 2020 (City of San José 1994), the working draft Santa Clara Valley Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Communities Conservation Plan (HCP/NCCP; ICF Jones & Stokes 2008) currently in development, and area- specific documents such as the North San José Development Policies Update Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (City of San José 2005); the Evergreen – East Hills Vision Strategy Project Draft EIR (City of San José 2006) and the Draft Supplemental EIR for Revision of the Evergreen Development Policy (City of San José 2008); the Coyote Valley Specific Plan Draft EIR and comments on that Draft EIR (City of San José 2007a and 2007b); the Final Program EIR for the Alviso Master Plan (City of San José 1998); the South Bay Salt Ponds Restoration Project’s biological resources existing conditions report (H.
    [Show full text]
  • 27 CFR Ch. I (4–1–20 Edition) § 9.161
    Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury Pt. 9 or the quantity in which to purchase 9.34 Finger Lakes. them for sale to consumers. 9.35 Edna Valley. (b) The industry member obligates 9.36 McDowell Valley. the retailer to participate in the pro- 9.37 California Shenandoah Valley. 9.38 Cienega Valley. motion to obtain the industry mem- 9.39 Paicines. ber’s product. 9.40 Leelanau Peninsula. (c) The retailer has a continuing obli- 9.41 Lancaster Valley. gation to purchase or otherwise pro- 9.42 Cole Ranch. mote the industry member’s product. 9.43 Rocky Knob. (d) The retailer has a commitment 9.44 Solano County Green Valley. not to terminate its relationship with 9.45 Suisun Valley. 9.46 Livermore Valley. the industry member with respect to 9.47 Hudson River Region. purchase of the industry member’s 9.48 Monticello. products. 9.49 Central Delaware Valley. (e) The practice involves the industry 9.50 Temecula Valley. member in the day-to-day operations of 9.51 Isle St. George. the retailer. For example, the industry 9.52 Chalk Hill. member controls the retailer’s deci- 9.53 Alexander Valley. 9.54 Santa Ynez Valley. sions on which brand of products to 9.55 Bell Mountain. purchase, the pricing of products, or 9.56 San Lucas. the manner in which the products will 9.57 Green Valley of Russian River Valley. be displayed on the retailer’s premises. 9.58 Carmel Valley. (f) The practice is discriminatory in 9.59 Arroyo Seco. that it is not offered to all retailers in 9.60 Shenandoah Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Maps and Structure Sections of the Southwestern Santa Clara Valley and Southern Santa Cruz Mountains, Santa Clara and Santa Cruz Counties, California
    Geologic maps and structure sections of the southwestern Santa Clara Valley and southern Santa Cruz Mountains, Santa Clara and Santa Cruz Counties, California By R.J. McLaughlin1, J.C. Clark2, E.E. Brabb1, E.J. Helley1, and C.J. Colón3 Pamphlet to accompany Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-2373 2001 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey 1U.S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Rd., Menlo Park, CA 94025 2Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA 15705 3Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 U.S DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MF-2373 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAPS AND STRUCTURE SECTIONS OF THE SOUTHWESTERN SANTA CLARA VALLEY AND SOUTHERN SANTA CRUZ MOUNTAINS, SANTA CLARA AND SANTA CRUZ COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA By R.J. McLaughlin, J.C. Clark, E.E. Brabb, E.J. Helley, and C.J. Colón INTRODUCTION This report depicts the geologic framework and structure of the San Francisco Bay region in the vicinity of southwestern Santa Clara Valley and the southern Santa Cruz Mountains. The maps encompass parts of Santa Clara and Santa Cruz Counties and include new and revised geologic mapping of the Los Gatos, Santa Teresa Hills, Laurel, Loma Prieta, and Mount Madonna 7.5' quadrangles and parts of the Morgan Hill and Gilroy 7.5' quadrangles. The mapping was carried out under the National Cooperative Geologic Mapping and Earthquake Hazards Reduction Programs of the U.S. Geological Survey between 1988 and 1997 as part of projects to map the geology of the 1:100,000 San Jose quadrangle (fig. 1) and to investigate the geology of the epicentral region of the October 17, 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake.
    [Show full text]
  • Gavilan College – Coyote Campus Project
    DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT GAVILAN COLLEGE – COYOTE CAMPUS PROJECT SCH No. 2007122006 FEBRUARY 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY..........................................................................................................................................iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................1 1.1 INTRODUCTION OVERVIEW ....................................................................................1 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION ..................................................................................................1 1.3 REFERENCE AVAILABILITY ....................................................................................1 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT ...................................................................2 2.1 OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................2 2.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION.............................................................................................2 2.3 PROJECT OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................13 2.4 USES OF THE EIR.......................................................................................................13 2.5 CONSISTENCY WITH ADOPTED PLANS AND POLICIES ..................................14 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION ......................................18 3.1 LAND USE...................................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Los Gatos, Santa Teresa Hills
    MISCELLANEOUS FIELD STUDIES MAP MF–2373 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Sheet 7 of 8 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Pamphlet accompanies map STRUCTURE SECTIONS OF THE LOS GATOS QUADRANGLE A A' A'' A''' A'''' FEET FEET (BEND) (BEND) 4000 (BEND) 4000 BUTANO SAN ANDREAS ALDERCROFT BERROCAL FAULT SHANNON FAULT FAULT ZONE FAULT ZONE ? ZONE FAULT ? 3000 Laurel Summit fmv ZONE 3000 fm Anticline Syncline fmc fmv fms Highway 17 Highway fmc fm 2000 Tsr Joi fmv 2000 fmv Qls Los Gatos Creek fms Qls Qls Tv Qls Qal Qt Qls fmc fm Burns Creek ? Qls fm Jos ? Kus Jos ? Jov ? Ttv Tt mine tailings Qls Jos g KJm fm Tms fm Jos 1000 ? mine tailings fm Tms Qpf 1000 Qls sc Tt Jos fm sc sc Tms Tt Tcml Tcm ? ? Qal Ttv g Tp Joi Tt fm Tst Tbu Tbu fm fm sc Tt Tcml Tv fms fpv sc fm g Tp Tls fmc Jos Tp fpv sc SEA LEVEL fm Tcm? ? Tt sc fm SEA LEVEL g fpl Jos Tbu sc fpv fm? Tcm KJm fm fm ? ? Joi fm QTsc? g Jos fms? Jos Jos Kus? Kus? fm ? fpv Tcm Tsr Tsr? Jov fpl Ttv -1000 Tsr ? Jos ? -1000 Tbu fm? EXPLANATION Jog ? Tst Jos -2000 -2000 ? Jos Strike-slip fault(-) Denotes block movement away from viewer; Jou - + ? (+) denotes block movement toward viewer -3000 -3000 - + ? Principal trace of the San Andreas faultDashed where -4000 -4000 + - approximate -5000 -5000 ? Dip-slip faultArrows denote relative vertical motion of fault blocks ? Jo* ? -6000 FAULT(?) -6000 Tbu? Surface locationOil drill hole ? -7000 Tbu? -7000 -8000 -8000 ? RANGE -9000 -9000 ? -10000 Jo* *Jo on structure sections delineates undivided -10000 rocks of the Coast Range ophiolite -11000 ? -11000 ? ? -12000 COAST
    [Show full text]