V-Tail Fact Sheets

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

V-Tail Fact Sheet - C35 through V35B APPLICABLE AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE: AD 94-20-04 R2 American Bonanza Society AFFECTED All C35, D35, E35, F35, G35, H35, J35, K35, M35, N35 and P35 airplanes. 316-945-1700 AIRPLANES All S35,V35,V35A and V35B airplanes that have not been modified to <www.bonanza.org> “straight tail” configuration using STC SA2149CE. SUPPORTING Beech Shop Manual 35-590096B19, Section 3, Beech Kit 35-4017-1 DOCUMENTS Beech Service Bulletin 2188 dated May 1987 Why was this AD put into effect? “The actions specific by this AD are intended to prevent structural failure of the V-tail, which could result in loss of control of the airplane.” When must AD 94-20-04 R2 be complied with? Some AD actions should have been complied with within the first 100 hours time in service (TIS) of the airplane after the AD’s effective date of November 28, 1994. Others must be accomplished within 100 hours TIS after June 27, 2003 and within every 100 hours TIS thereafter. What actions does this AD require? AD 94-20-04 R2 requires, within 100 hours TIS of 11/28/94: • balancing ruddervators within the specified limits stated in the Beech shop manual. • inspecting the empennage, aft fuselage and ruddervator control system for damage, and repairing as necessary. • checking ruddervator and trim tab system controls, cable tensions and rigging and setting or repairing as necessary. • Unless previously accomplished to comply with earlier ADs, removing any external stabilator reinforcements (except for some installed on S35,V35,V35A and V35B airplanes) and sealing all resulting holes with rivets. • Unless previously accomplished to comply with earlier ADs, installing new stabilator reinforcements, setting the nose- down trim and replacing the trim tab control cables with larger-diameter cables. • verifying the accuracy of aircraft weight and balance information and correcting any discrepancies. Within 100 hours TIS of June 27, 2003 and within every 100 hours TIS thereafter the AD requires: • visual inspection of the bulkheads and skin at fuselage stations 256.9 and 272 for damage, and repair as necessary. REPETITIVE BULKHEAD AND SKIN INSPECTION POINTS 256.9 272.0 See FAA Airworthiness Directive 94-20-04 R2 and the supporting documents for more information..

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The Effects of Design, Manufacturing Processes, and Operations Management on the Assembly of Aircraft Composite Structure by Robert Mark Coleman
The Effects of Design, Manufacturing Processes, and Operations Management on the Assembly of Aircraft Composite Structure by Robert Mark Coleman B.S. Civil Engineering Duke University, 1984 Submitted to the Sloan School of Management and the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degrees of Master of Science in Management and Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics in conjuction with the LEADERS FOR MANUFACTURING PROGRAM at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 1991 © 1991, MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Signature of Author_ .• May, 1991 Certified by Stephen C. Graves Professor of Management Science Certified by A/roJ , Paul A. Lagace Profes s Aeron icand Astronautics Accepted by Jeffrey A. Barks Associate Dean aster's and Bachelor's Programs I.. Jloan School of Management Accepted by - No U Professor Harold Y. Wachman Chairman, Department Graduate Committee Aero Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics MASSACHiUSEITS INSTITUTE OFN Fr1 1'9n.nry JUJN 12: 1991 1 UiBRARIES The Effects of Design, Manufacturing Processes, and Operations Management on the Assembly of Aircraft Composite Structure by Robert Mark Coleman Submitted to the Sloan School of Management and the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degrees of Master of Science in Management and Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics June 1991 ABSTRACT Composite materials have many characteristics well-suited for aerospace applications. Advanced graphite/epoxy composites are especially favored due to their high stiffness, strength-to-weight ratios, and resistance to fatigue and corrosion. Research emphasis to date has been on the design and fabrication of composite detail parts, with considerably less attention given to the cost and quality issues in their subsequent assembly.
[Show full text]
Electrically Heated Composite Leading Edges for Aircraft Anti-Icing Applications”
UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES “FEDERICO II” PhD course in Aerospace, Naval and Quality Engineering PhD Thesis in Aerospace Engineering “ELECTRICALLY HEATED COMPOSITE LEADING EDGES FOR AIRCRAFT ANTI-ICING APPLICATIONS” by Francesco De Rosa 2010 To my girlfriend Tiziana for her patience and understanding precious and rare human virtues University of Naples Federico II Department of Aerospace Engineering DIAS PhD Thesis in Aerospace Engineering Author: F. De Rosa Tutor: Prof. G.P. Russo PhD course in Aerospace, Naval and Quality Engineering XXIII PhD course in Aerospace Engineering, 2008-2010 PhD course coordinator: Prof. A. Moccia ___________________________________________________________________________ Francesco De Rosa - Electrically Heated Composite Leading Edges for Aircraft Anti-Icing Applications 2 Abstract An investigation was conducted in the Aerospace Engineering Department (DIAS) at Federico II University of Naples aiming to evaluate the feasibility and the performance of an electrically heated composite leading edge for anti-icing and de-icing applications. A 283 [mm] chord NACA0012 airfoil prototype was designed, manufactured and equipped with an High Temperature composite leading edge with embedded Ni-Cr heating element. The heating element was fed by a DC power supply unit and the average power densities supplied to the leading edge were ranging 1.0 to 30.0 [kW m-2]. The present investigation focused on thermal tests experimentally performed under fixed icing conditions with zero AOA, Mach=0.2, total temperature of -20 [°C], liquid water content LWC=0.6 [g m-3] and average mean volume droplet diameter MVD=35 [µm]. These fixed conditions represented the top icing performance of the Icing Flow Facility (IFF) available at DIAS and therefore it has represented the “sizing design case” for the tested prototype.
[Show full text]
Glider Handbook, Chapter 2: Components and Systems
Chapter 2 Components and Systems Introduction Although gliders come in an array of shapes and sizes, the basic design features of most gliders are fundamentally the same. All gliders conform to the aerodynamic principles that make flight possible. When air flows over the wings of a glider, the wings produce a force called lift that allows the aircraft to stay aloft. Glider wings are designed to produce maximum lift with minimum drag. 2-1 Glider Design With each generation of new materials and development and improvements in aerodynamics, the performance of gliders The earlier gliders were made mainly of wood with metal has increased. One measure of performance is glide ratio. A fastenings, stays, and control cables. Subsequent designs glide ratio of 30:1 means that in smooth air a glider can travel led to a fuselage made of fabric-covered steel tubing forward 30 feet while only losing 1 foot of altitude. Glide glued to wood and fabric wings for lightness and strength. ratio is discussed further in Chapter 5, Glider Performance. New materials, such as carbon fiber, fiberglass, glass reinforced plastic (GRP), and Kevlar® are now being used Due to the critical role that aerodynamic efficiency plays in to developed stronger and lighter gliders. Modern gliders the performance of a glider, gliders often have aerodynamic are usually designed by computer-aided software to increase features seldom found in other aircraft. The wings of a modern performance. The first glider to use fiberglass extensively racing glider have a specially designed low-drag laminar flow was the Akaflieg Stuttgart FS-24 Phönix, which first flew airfoil.
[Show full text]
Weight Optimization of Empennage of Light Weight Aircraft
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH VOLUME 3, ISSUE 4, APRIL 2014 ISSN 2277-8616 Weight Optimization Of Empennage Of Light Weight Aircraft Sheikh Naunehal Ahamed, Jadav Vijaya Kumar, Parimi Sravani Abstract: The objective of the research is to optimize the empennage of a light weight aircraft such as Zenith aircraft. The case is specified by a unique set of geometry, materials, and strength-to-weight factors. The anticipated loads associated with the empennage structure are based on previous light aircraft design loads. These loads are applied on the model to analyze the structural behavior considering the materials having high strength-to-weight ratio. The 3D modeling of the empennage is designed using PRO-E tools and FEA analysis especially the structural analysis was done using ANSYS software to validate the empennage model. The analysis shall reveal the behavior of the structure under applied load conditions for both the optimized structure and existing model. The results obtained using the software are attempted to validate by hand calculations using various weight estimation methods. Index Terms: Empennage, Zenith STOL CH 750 light sport utility airplane, Aircraft structures and materials, PRO-E, ANSYS, Composite materials, Weight estimation methods. ———————————————————— 1 INTRODUCTION compromise in strength and stiffness is called optimal The use of composite materials in the primary structure of structure. Hence, growth factor, which is relationship between aircraft is becoming more common, the industry demand for total weight and the payload, should be as low as possible. predicting and minimizing the product and maintenance cost is Materials with a high strength to weight ratio can be used to rising.
[Show full text]
Airframe & Aircraft Components By
Airframe & Aircraft Components (According to the Syllabus Prescribed by Director General of Civil Aviation, Govt. of India) FIRST EDITION AIRFRAME & AIRCRAFT COMPONENTS Prepared by L.N.V.M. Society Group of Institutes * School of Aeronautics ( Approved by Director General of Civil Aviation, Govt. of India) * School of Engineering & Technology ( Approved by Director General of Civil Aviation, Govt. of India) Compiled by Sheo Singh Published By L.N.V.M. Society Group of Institutes H-974, Palam Extn., Part-1, Sec-7, Dwarka, New Delhi-77 Published By L.N.V.M. Society Group of Institutes, Palam Extn., Part-1, Sec.-7, Dwarka, New Delhi - 77 First Edition 2007 All rights reserved; no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publishers. Type Setting Sushma Cover Designed by Abdul Aziz Printed at Graphic Syndicate, Naraina, New Delhi. Dedicated To Shri Laxmi Narain Verma [ Who Lived An Honest Life ] Preface This book is intended as an introductory text on “Airframe and Aircraft Components” which is an essential part of General Engineering and Maintenance Practices of DGCA license examination, BAMEL, Paper-II. It is intended that this book will provide basic information on principle, fundamentals and technical procedures in the subject matter areas relating to the “Airframe and Aircraft Components”. The written text is supplemented with large number of suitable diagrams for reinforcing the key aspects. I acknowledge with thanks the contribution of the faculty and staff of L.N.V.M.
[Show full text]
Aviation for Kids: a Mini Course for Students in Grades 2-5 Adopted from Avkids for Use by the EAA
Aviation For Kids: A Mini Course For Students in Grades 2-5 Adopted from AvKids for use by the EAA The AvKids Program developed by the National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) represents what may be the best short course in aviation science for students in grades 2-5. The following pages represent a slightly modified version of the program, with additions and deletions to provide the best activities for the development of the four forces of flight. In addition, follow up activities included involve team work problem solving in geography, writing, and mathematics. In addition, what may be the best aviation glossary for young students has been included. Topics Covered in The Mini-Course 1. The Four Forces of Flight 2. Thrust 3. Weight 4. Drag 5. Lift 6. The Main Parts of a Plane 7. Business Aviation: An Extension of General Aviation 8. Additional Aviation Projects 9. Aviation Terms Revised Dec. 2015 The Four Forces of Flight An aircraft in straight and level, constant velocity flight is acted upon by four forces: lift, weight, thrust, and drag. The opposing forces balance each other; in the vertical direction, lift opposes weight, in the horizontal direction, thrust opposes drag. Any time one force is greater than the other force along either of these directions, an acceleration will result in the direction of the larger force. This acceleration will occur until the two forces along the direction of interest again become balanced. Drag: The air resistance that tends to slow the forward movement of an airplane due to the collisions of the aircraft with air molecules.
[Show full text]
A Methodology to Predict the Empennage In-Flight Loads of A
DOT/FAA/AR-00/50 A Methodology to Predict the Office of Aviation Research Washington, D.C. 20591 Empennage In-Flight Loads of a General Aviation Aircraft Using Backpropagation Neural Networks February 2001 Final Report This document is available to the U.S. public Through the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), Springfield, Virginia 22161 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturer's names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. This document does not constitute FAA certification policy. Consult your local FAA aircraft certification office as to its use. This report is available at the Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center's Full-Text Technical Reports page: actlibrary.tc.faa.gov in Adobe Acrobat portable document format (PDF). Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. DOT/FAA/AR-00/50 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date A METHODOLOGY TO PREDICT THE EMPENNAGE IN-FLIGHT LOADS OF February 2001 A GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT USING BACKPROPAGATION NEURAL 6. Performing Organization Code NETWORKS 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. David Kim and Maciej Marciniak 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University 600 S. Clyde Morris Blvd.
[Show full text]
Some Buffet Response Characteristics of a Twin-Vertical-Tail Configuration
i t I, NASA Technical Memorandum 1 0 2 7 4 9 Some Buffet Response Characteristics of a Twin-Vertical-Tail Configuration Stanley R. Cole, Steven W. Moss, and Robert V. Doggett, Jr. (NASA-TM-IO_749) SQME nUFFFT RFSPONSF N91-13_12 CNARACTERISTIC3 OF A TWTN-VFgTICAL-TAIL CON_IGURATIO_ (NASA) 25 p CSCL OIA Uncl ;is G3/02 03192_2 October 1990 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia 23665-5225 m SOME BUFFET RESPONSE CHARACTERISTICS OF A TWIN-VERTICAL-TAIL CONFIGURATION By Stanley R. Cole, Steven W. Moss, and Robert V. Doggett, Jr. SUMMARY A rigid, 1/6-size, full-span model of an F-18 airplane was fitted with flexible vertical tails of two different levels of stiffness. These tails were buffet tested in the Langley Transonic Dynamics Tunnel. Vertical-tail buffet response results that were obtained over the range of angles of attack from -10 ° to +40 ° degrees, and over the range of Mach numbers from 0.30 to 0.95 are presented. These results indicate the following: (1) the buffet response occurs in the first bending mode; (2) the buffet response increases with increasing dynamic pressure, but changes in response are not linearly proportional to the changes in dynamic pressure; (3) the buffet response is larger at M=0.30 than it is at the higher Mach numbers; (4) the maximum intensity of the buffeting is described as heavy to severe using an assessment criteria proposed by another investigator; and (5) the data at different dynamic pressures and for the different tails correlate reasonably well using the buffet excitation parameter derived from the dynamic analysis of buffeting.
[Show full text]
Basic Aircraft Construction
CHAPTER 4 AIRCRAFT BASIC CONSTRUCTION INTRODUCTION useless. All materials used to construct an aircraft must be reliable. Reliability minimizes the possibility of Naval aircraft are built to meet certain specified dangerous and unexpected failures. requirements. These requirements must be selected so they can be built into one aircraft. It is not possible for Many forces and structural stresses act on an one aircraft to possess all characteristics; just as it isn't aircraft when it is flying and when it is static. When it is possible for an aircraft to have the comfort of a static, the force of gravity produces weight, which is passenger transport and the maneuverability of a supported by the landing gear. The landing gear absorbs fighter. The type and class of the aircraft determine how the forces imposed on the aircraft by takeoffs and strong it must be built. A Navy fighter must be fast, landings. maneuverable, and equipped for attack and defense. To During flight, any maneuver that causes meet these requirements, the aircraft is highly powered acceleration or deceleration increases the forces and and has a very strong structure. stresses on the wings and fuselage. The airframe of a fixed-wing aircraft consists of the Stresses on the wings, fuselage, and landing gear of following five major units: aircraft are tension, compression, shear, bending, and 1. Fuselage torsion. These stresses are absorbed by each component of the wing structure and transmitted to the fuselage 2. Wings structure. The empennage (tail section) absorbs the 3. Stabilizers same stresses and transmits them to the fuselage.
[Show full text]
777 Empennage Certification Approach
Volume I: Composites Applications and Design 777 EMPENNAGE CERTIFICATION APPROACH A. Fawcett1, J. Trostle2, S. Ward3 1777 Program, Structures Engineering, Principal Engineer and DER 2777 Program, Structures Engineering, Manager 3Composite Methods and Allowables, Principal Engineer Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, PO. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington, USA SUMMARY: This paper presents the Boeing approach to certification of the 777 composite empennage structure. The design team used carbon-fiber-reinforced plastic (CFRP) materials for the horizontal and vertical stabilizers, the elevators, and the rudder of the new 777 twinjet. Boeing based its approach to certification on analysis supported by coupon and component test evidence in compliance with guidelines issued by the FAA and JAA. The test program validated analysis methods, material design values, and manufacturing processes. The new toughenedresin material used on the 777 provides improved damage resistance over conventional thermoset materials. The 777 empennage represents a major commitment to composites in commercial aircraft service. KEYWORDS: commercial transport aircraft, certification, structural testing, carbon-fiber reinforced plasticError! Bookmark not defined., composite structure, strength, damage tolerance, and fatigue. INTRODUCTION Many components on the 777 aircraft contain composite materials (figure 1). Examples include fairings, floorbeams, engine nacelles, movable and fixed wing trailing edge surfaces, gear doors, and the empennage-including the horizontal and vertical stabilizers, elevators, and rudder. Composite materials are used primarily to reduce weight and improve aircraft efficiency. For some components, composite materials are appropriate, based on other requirements such as fatigue resistance, surface complexity, corrosion resistance, or manufacturing preference. The use of CFRP in 777 empennage structure follows developmental work and commercial service from the early 1980s.
[Show full text]
Parts of an Airplane
National Aeronautics and Space Administration GRADES 5-8 Parts of an Airplane Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate parts of an airplane Museum inin aa BOX SerSeriesieieXs www.nasa.gov MUSEUM IN A BOX (Photo courtesy of NASA) Parts of an Airplane Lesson Overview In this lesson, students will learn about the abilities of technological design and understandings of science and technology as they analyze the individual components of an aircraft, first learning how to identify them, then gaining an understanding of how each component works. Objectives Students will: Materials: 1. Learn about the abilities of technological design and understandings about science and technology as In the Box they identify identify individual aircraft components, None regardless of design or manufacturer. Provided by User None GRADES 5-8 Time Requirements: 1 hour parts of an airplane 2 Background Any vehicle, whether it’s a car, truck, boat, airplane, helicopter or rocket, is made up of many individual component parts. Some components are common amongst a variety of vehicles, while others are exclusive to specific types. Occasionally, a component is modified and given a different name, although its basic principle of operation remains intact. This lesson is designed to look at those individual components and allow students to not only identify them, but to understand how they work together to create a functioning aircraft. Figure 1 shows a typical airplane with its major components listed. Many external airplane components are constructed of metal alloys, although composites made of materials such as carbon fiber and a variety of fiberglass resins are becoming more popular as technology improves.
[Show full text]
Aircraft Empennage Structural Detail Design 421S9303B2R2 19
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19940019859 2020-06-16T16:57:45+00:00Z NASA-CR-1.L 9_496 i Aircraft Empennage Structural Detail Design 421S9303B2R2 19 Apt il, 1993 AE4211031gravo Lead Engineer: Greg MehoUc Team Members: Ronda Brown Melissa Hall Robert Harvey Michael Singer Gustavo ?'ella Submitted To: Dr. J.G. Ladesic N94-24332 (NASA-CR-1954qb) AIRCRAFT EMPENNAGE STRUCTURAL OETAIL DESIGN (Embry-RidGle Aeronautical Univ.) Unclas 73 D G3/05 0204228 ORIGINAL PAGE IS OF POOR QUALITY Table of Contents p. iii List of Figures and Tables p, 1 1 Project Summary 1.1 Design Goals p. 1 1.2 Statement of Work Requirements p. 1 pp. 2-7 2. Description of Design 2.1 Horizontal Stabilizer pp. 2-3 2.2 Elevator pp. 3-4 2.3 Vertical Stabilizer pp. 4-5 2.4 Rudder p. 6 2.5 Tail Cone pp. 6-7 pp, 7-18 3. Loads and Loading p. 7 3.1 Horizontal Stabilizer p. 8 3.2 Elevator pp. 8-13 3.3 Calculations on the H.S. and Elevator 3.4 Vertical Stabilizer p. 13 p, 13 3.5 Rudder pp. 14 - 16 3.6 Calculations On V.S. and Rudder p, 17 3.7 Tall Cone 3.8 Calculations on the Tall Cone pp. 17 - 18 pp. 19-33 4. Structural Substantlatlon pp. 19-22 4.1 Sizing the Horizontal Stabilizer pp. 22-24 4.2 Sizing the Vertical Stabilizer pp. 24- 25 4.3 Sizing the Rudder p. 25 4.4 Sizing the Elevator pp. 26-33 4.5 Sizing the Tall Cone pp.
[Show full text]