Appendix 5: Bird Sub-Group Report Status, Trends And
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Table 7: Species Changing IUCN Red List Status (2014-2015)
IUCN Red List version 2015.4: Table 7 Last Updated: 19 November 2015 Table 7: Species changing IUCN Red List Status (2014-2015) Published listings of a species' status may change for a variety of reasons (genuine improvement or deterioration in status; new information being available that was not known at the time of the previous assessment; taxonomic changes; corrections to mistakes made in previous assessments, etc. To help Red List users interpret the changes between the Red List updates, a summary of species that have changed category between 2014 (IUCN Red List version 2014.3) and 2015 (IUCN Red List version 2015-4) and the reasons for these changes is provided in the table below. IUCN Red List Categories: EX - Extinct, EW - Extinct in the Wild, CR - Critically Endangered, EN - Endangered, VU - Vulnerable, LR/cd - Lower Risk/conservation dependent, NT - Near Threatened (includes LR/nt - Lower Risk/near threatened), DD - Data Deficient, LC - Least Concern (includes LR/lc - Lower Risk, least concern). Reasons for change: G - Genuine status change (genuine improvement or deterioration in the species' status); N - Non-genuine status change (i.e., status changes due to new information, improved knowledge of the criteria, incorrect data used previously, taxonomic revision, etc.); E - Previous listing was an Error. IUCN Red List IUCN Red Reason for Red List Scientific name Common name (2014) List (2015) change version Category Category MAMMALS Aonyx capensis African Clawless Otter LC NT N 2015-2 Ailurus fulgens Red Panda VU EN N 2015-4 -
The Importance of Muraviovka Park, Amur Province, Far East Russia, For
FORKTAIL 33 (2017): 81–87 The importance of Muraviovka Park, Amur province, Far East Russia, for bird species threatened at regional, national and international level based on observations between 2011 and 2016 WIELAND HEIM & SERGEI M. SMIRENSKI The middle reaches of the Amur River in Far East Russia are still an under-surveyed region, yet holding a very high regional biodiversity. During a six-year survey at Muraviovka Park, a non-governmental nature reserve, 271 bird species have been recorded, 14 of which are globally threatened, highlighting the importance of this area for bird conservation. INTRODUCTION RESULTS Recent studies have shown that East Asia and especially the Amur A total of 271 species was recorded inside Muraviovka Park between basin hold huge numbers of endangered species, and the region was 2011 and 2016; 24 species are listed as Near Treatened (NT), designated as a hotspot of threatened biodiversity (e.g. Vignieri 2014). Vulnerable (VU), Endangered (EN) or Critically Endangered (CR) Tis is especially true for birds. Te East Asian–Australasian Flyway (BirdLife International 2017a), 31 species in the Russian Red Data is not only one of the richest in species and individuals but is also the Book (Iliashenko & Iliashenko 2000) (Ru) and 60 species in the least surveyed and most threatened fyway (Yong et al. 2015). Current Amur region Red Data Book (Glushchenko et al. 2009) (Am). In data about distribution, population size and phenology are virtually the case of the Russian and Amur regional Red Data Books, the lacking for many regions, including the Amur region, Far East Russia. -
Study Into the Avian Value of Different Aged Stands of Phragmites Australis at Mai Po Nature Reserve
The Hong Kong Bird Ringing Group STUDY INTO THE AVIAN VALUE OF DIFFERENT AGED STANDS OF PHRAGMITES AUSTRALIS AT MAI PO NATURE RESERVE FINAL REPORT : 2009 CONTENTS Chapter Page 0. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ii 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Study Objectives 1 2. METHODS 1 2.1 Study Area 1 2.2 Reed Stand Treatment 2 2.3 Reed Stand Structure Data 2 2.4 Bird Data 3 2.5 Control Plot 3 2.6 Statistical Methods 3 3. RESULTS 4 3.1 Reed Stand Structure 4 3.2 Bird Survey 8 4. DISCUSSION 15 5. RECOMMENDATIONS 16 6. CONCLUSION 16 7. REFERENCES & BIBLIOGRAPHY 17 APPENDIX I Trapping Data for individual Bird Species per Season (Spring and Autumn) 18 Tables 1. Summary of Reed Data for Different Aged Stands of Reed 5 2. Summary of Reed Structure Data from Each Plot 5 3. Mean Abundance per Trapping Session in Autumn (August– December) of the Ten Most Numerous Birds 10 4. Mean Abundance per Trapping Session in Spring (January - May) of the Ten Most Numerous Birds 11 Figures 1. Location of Gei wai #8 and Study Area inside Mai Po Nature Reserve 2 2. Layout and Treatment of the Five 1-ha Study Plots inside Gei wai #8 2 3. Graphs Showing Changes in Reed Stand Structure Attributes by Reed Stand Age 6 4. Graphs Showing Changes in Reed Stand Structure Attributes by Year 7 5. Graphs Showing Changes in Bird Species Abundance by Year 11 6. Graphs Showing Changes in Bird Species Abundance by Reed Stand Age 12 7. -
Status and Conservation of Shearwaters of the North Pacific
Status and conservation of shearwaters Reprinted from Vermeer, K.; Briggs, K.T.; Morgan, K.H.; Siegel-Causey, D. (eds.). 1993. The status, ecology. and of the North Pacific conservation of marine birds of the North Pacific. Can. Wildl. Sen. Spec. Publ., Ottawa. William T. Everett’ and Robert L. Pitman’ ‘WesreniFoundarion of Vertebrate Zoolog).. 1100 Glendon Avenue, Los Angeies, CA 90024 ’Sowhwesr Fisheries Science Center,P.O. Box 271, La Jolla, CA 92038 Abstract level of effort expended on pelagic studies of many seabirds, including shearwaters, has increased dramatically, yielding Of the shearwaters that breed in the North Pacific, many new facts on behaviour, habitat selection, migratory the species in the most peril at present is Townsend’s routes and timing, feeding habits, and mortality. Shearwater Pufinus ourtcuforis. Feral cats and pigs pose a In this paper we discuss the general biology and status threat on its breeding grounds. More information is needed of each of the shearwater species occurring in the North Pacific, on its current status, and that of the Black-vented Shearwater consider threats and hazards both on land and at sea, and offer P. opisthomefas,most of whose nesting colonies have well- recommendations for future study and conservation efforts. established feral cat populations. Efforts are being made to protect Newell’s Shearwater P. newelli in the Hawaiian Islands. 2. Species accounts The single greatest threat to migrant shearwaters in the North Pacific is drift gillnet fisheries, which kill hundreds of 2.1. Calonectris leuromelas Streaked Shearwater thousands of birds annually. This species breeds in the far-western Pacific at many locations from the Ryukyu and Bonin islands north to Qingdao RhmC Island in the Yellow Sea, islands off northern Honshu, Japan (Melville 1984; Hasegawa 1984), and has nested on Kmamizin De tous les puffins qui se reproduisent dans le Pacifique Island in the former U.S.S.R.(Litvinenko 1976). -
Introduction
Threatened Birds of Asia: The BirdLife International Red Data Book Editors N. J. COLLAR (Editor-in-chief), A. V. ANDREEV, S. CHAN, M. J. CROSBY, S. SUBRAMANYA and J. A. TOBIAS Maps by RUDYANTO and M. J. CROSBY Principal compilers and data contributors ■ BANGLADESH P. Thompson ■ BHUTAN R. Pradhan; C. Inskipp, T. Inskipp ■ CAMBODIA Sun Hean; C. M. Poole ■ CHINA ■ MAINLAND CHINA Zheng Guangmei; Ding Changqing, Gao Wei, Gao Yuren, Li Fulai, Liu Naifa, Ma Zhijun, the late Tan Yaokuang, Wang Qishan, Xu Weishu, Yang Lan, Yu Zhiwei, Zhang Zhengwang. ■ HONG KONG Hong Kong Bird Watching Society (BirdLife Affiliate); H. F. Cheung; F. N. Y. Lock, C. K. W. Ma, Y. T. Yu. ■ TAIWAN Wild Bird Federation of Taiwan (BirdLife Partner); L. Liu Severinghaus; Chang Chin-lung, Chiang Ming-liang, Fang Woei-horng, Ho Yi-hsian, Hwang Kwang-yin, Lin Wei-yuan, Lin Wen-horn, Lo Hung-ren, Sha Chian-chung, Yau Cheng-teh. ■ INDIA Bombay Natural History Society (BirdLife Partner Designate) and Sálim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History; L. Vijayan and V. S. Vijayan; S. Balachandran, R. Bhargava, P. C. Bhattacharjee, S. Bhupathy, A. Chaudhury, P. Gole, S. A. Hussain, R. Kaul, U. Lachungpa, R. Naroji, S. Pandey, A. Pittie, V. Prakash, A. Rahmani, P. Saikia, R. Sankaran, P. Singh, R. Sugathan, Zafar-ul Islam ■ INDONESIA BirdLife International Indonesia Country Programme; Ria Saryanthi; D. Agista, S. van Balen, Y. Cahyadin, R. F. A. Grimmett, F. R. Lambert, M. Poulsen, Rudyanto, I. Setiawan, C. Trainor ■ JAPAN Wild Bird Society of Japan (BirdLife Partner); Y. Fujimaki; Y. Kanai, H. -
Natural History of Japanese Birds
Natural History of Japanese Birds Hiroyoshi Higuchi English text translated by Reiko Kurosawa HEIBONSHA 1 Copyright © 2014 by Hiroyoshi Higuchi, Reiko Kurosawa Typeset and designed by: Washisu Design Office Printed in Japan Heibonsha Limited, Publishers 3-29 Kanda Jimbocho, Chiyoda-ku Tokyo 101-0051 Japan All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the publisher. The English text can be downloaded from the following website for free. http://www.heibonsha.co.jp/ 2 CONTENTS Chapter 1 The natural environment and birds of Japan 6 Chapter 2 Representative birds of Japan 11 Chapter 3 Abundant varieties of forest birds and water birds 13 Chapter 4 Four seasons of the satoyama 17 Chapter 5 Active life of urban birds 20 Chapter 6 Interesting ecological behavior of birds 24 Chapter 7 Bird migration — from where to where 28 Chapter 8 The present state of Japanese birds and their future 34 3 Natural History of Japanese Birds Preface [BOOK p.3] Japan is a beautiful country. The hills and dales are covered “satoyama”. When horsetail shoots come out and violets and with rich forest green, the river waters run clear and the moun- cherry blossoms bloom in spring, birds begin to sing and get tain ranges in the distance look hazy purple, which perfectly ready for reproduction. Summer visitors also start arriving in fits a Japanese expression of “Sanshi-suimei (purple mountains Japan one after another from the tropical regions to brighten and clear waters)”, describing great natural beauty. -
GRUNDSTEN Japan 0102 2016
Birding Japan (M. Grundsten, Sweden) 2016 Japan, January 30th - February 14th 2016 Karuizawa – E Hokkaido – S Kyushu – Okinawa – Hachijo-jima Front cover Harlequin Duck Histrionicus histrionicus, common along eastern Hokkaido coasts. Photo: Måns Grundsten Participants Måns Grundsten ([email protected], compiler, most photos), Mattias Andersson, Mattias Gerdin, Sweden. Highlights • A shy Solitary Snipe in the main stream at Karuizawa. • Huge-billed Japanese Grosbeaks and a neat 'griseiventris' Eurasian Bullfinch at Karuizawa. • A single Rustic Bunting behind 7/Eleven at Karuizawa. • Amazing auks from the Oarai-Tomakomai ferry. Impressive numbers of Rhinoceros Auklet! • Parakeet Auklet fly-bys. • Blakiston's Fish Owl in orderly fashion at Rausu. • Displaying Black Scoters at Notsuke peninsula. • Majestic Steller's Sea Eagles in hundreds. • Winter gulls at Hokkaido. • Finding a vagrant Golden-crowned Sparrow at Kiritappu at the same feeders as Asian Rosy Finches. • No less than 48(!) Rock Sandpipers. • A lone immature Red-faced Cormorants on cliffs at Cape Nosappu. • A pair of Ural Owls on day roost at Kushiro. • Feeding Ryukyu Minivets at Lake Mi-ike. • Fifteen thousand plus cranes at Arasaki. • Unexpectedly productive Kogawa Dam – Long-billed Plover. • Saunders's Gulls at Yatsushiro. • Kin Ricefields on Okinawa, easy birding, lots of birds, odd-placed Tundra Bean Geese. • Okinawa Woodpecker and Rail within an hour close to Fushigawa Dam, Yanbaru. • Whistling Green Pigeon eating fruits in Ada Village. • Vocal Ryukyu Robins. • Good shorebird diversity in Naha. • Male Izu Thrush during a short break on Hachijo-jima. • Triple Albatrosses! • Bulwer's Petrel close to the ship. Planning the trip – Future aspects When planning a birding trip to Japan there is a lot of consideration to be made. -
Specialist Group on Storks, Ibises and Spoonbills Newsletter
INTERNATIONAL WATERFOWL AND WETLANDS RESEARCH BUREAU/ INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BIRD PRESERVATION/ IUCN -- THE WORLD CONSERVATION UNION SPECIALIST GROUP ON STORKS, IBISES AND SPOONBILLS NEWSLETTER Volume 5, Number 1/2 November, 1992 LETTER FROM THE CO-CHAIRS improve management of small populations of endangered species. There is a great deal of exciting activity and new involvement within SIS. In April, Koen attended Initially, Michael Soull! and others began the Waldrapp Ibis Conservation meeting in Rabat, using mathematical models to examine the vulner Morocco (page 8). This was a productive meeting. abilities of small, threatened populations and to The increased interest and cooperation will lead to a contribute to their management (See references more unified and effective conservation effort. We below). More recently, the IUCN/SSC Captive hope that similar cooperative efforts will be generated Breeding Specialist Group has developed one for other species. aspect of the use of models. Special (PVA) meetings are held to model individual endangered In July, Malcolm attended a workshop for the species (e.g., the recent PVA meeting on the conservation of storks and cranes in the Amur River Waldrapp Ibis in Rabat). At these meetings a Basin (page 9). The meeting was well attended by single computer model is used: Vortex which was Russians, Chinese, Japanese, Koreans as well as written by Robert Lacy of the Brookfield Zoo. conservationists from Hong Kong and the United States. One working group dealt with the Oriental Because it is commonly used, the term White Stork Ciconia boyciana. We discussed and PVA has come to mean different things to differ summarized the conservation needs of the species. -
Iucn Red Data List Information on Species Listed On, and Covered by Cms Appendices
UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC4/Doc.8/Rev.1/Annex 1 ANNEX 1 IUCN RED DATA LIST INFORMATION ON SPECIES LISTED ON, AND COVERED BY CMS APPENDICES Content General Information ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Species in Appendix I ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Mammalia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Aves ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Reptilia ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Pisces ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. -
Avibase Page 1Of 18
Avibase Page 1of 18 Col Location Date Start time Duration Distance Avibase - Bird Checklists of the World 1 Country or region: Samut Sakhon 2 Number of species: 365 3 Number of endemics: 0 4 Number of breeding endemics: 0 5 Number of globally threatened species: 20 6 Number of extinct species: 0 7 Number of introduced species: 2 8 9 10 Recommended citation: Lepage, D. 2019. Checklist of the birds of Samut Sakhon. Avibase, the world bird database. Retrieved from .https://avibase.bsc- eoc.org/checklist.jsp?lang=EN®ion=th01ss&list=ebird&format=1 [19/09/2019]. Make your observations count! Submit your data to ebird.org - Legend: [x] accidental [ex] extirpated [EX] extinct [EW] extinct in the wild [E] endemic [e] endemic (country/region) Common name Scientific name Synonym Status 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ANSERIFORMES: Anatidae Lesser Whistling-Duck Dendrocygna javanica Knob-billed Duck Sarkidiornis melanotos Ruddy Shelduck Tadorna ferruginea Cotton Pygmy-Goose Nettapus coromandelianus Garganey Spatula querquedula Northern Shoveler Spatula clypeata Green-winged Teal Anas crecca Green-winged Teal (Eurasian) Anas crecca crecca Baer's Pochard Aythya baeri Critically endangered GALLIFORMES: Phasianidae Green Peafowl Pavo muticus Rare/AccidentalEnda ngered Blue-breasted Quail Synoicus chinensis Red Junglefowl Gallus gallus PODICIPEDIFORMES: Podicipedidae Little Grebe Tachybaptus ruficollis Little Grebe (Little) Tachybaptus ruficollis [ruficollis Group] COLUMBIFORMES: Columbidae Rock Pigeon Columba livia Rock Pigeon (Feral Pigeon) Columba livia (Feral -
Somerset's Ecological Network
Somerset’s Ecological Network Mapping the components of the ecological network in Somerset 2015 Report This report was produced by Michele Bowe, Eleanor Higginson, Jake Chant and Michelle Osbourn of Somerset Wildlife Trust, and Larry Burrows of Somerset County Council, with the support of Dr Kevin Watts of Forest Research. The BEETLE least-cost network model used to produce Somerset’s Ecological Network was developed by Forest Research (Watts et al, 2010). GIS data and mapping was produced with the support of Somerset Environmental Records Centre and First Ecology Somerset Wildlife Trust 34 Wellington Road Taunton TA1 5AW 01823 652 400 Email: [email protected] somersetwildlife.org Front Cover: Broadleaved woodland ecological network in East Mendip Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 2. Policy and Legislative Background to Ecological Networks ............................................ 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3 Government White Paper on the Natural Environment .............................................. 3 National Planning Policy Framework ......................................................................... 3 The Habitats and Birds Directives ............................................................................. 4 The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010 .................................. -
Identification of Pine Bunting T
Identification of Pine Bunting Daniele Occhiato he nominate subspecies of Pine Bunting tion between the two species in areas of sym- T Emberiza leucocephalos leucocephalos breeds patry on their Siberian breeding grounds. First- in a large part of Siberia from the western slopes generation hybrids, especially males, are gene- of the Ural (55° E) east to the Pacific, including rally distinctive and do not lead to confusion. Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands (c 155° E). It However, such hybrids are fertile, and back- ranges north to the Arctic Circle (66° N) and crosses with members of one or the other spe- south to northern Mongolia (50° N); a disjunct cies, or with other hybrids, lead to individuals in population breeds further south in the Altai, which evidence of hybridization is even more Tarbagatay, Ala Tau and Tien Shan mountain diluted, and often very difficult to detect in the ranges (45° N). A geographically isolated and field. In some cases, only careful in-hand exami- apparently sedentary subspecies, E l fronto, nation can reveal such hybrid characters. For breeds in northern Qinghai and Gansu prov- example, a study by Eugeny Panov (in Bradshaw inces, China (Cramp & Perrins 1994, Byers et al & Gray 1993) revealed that out of 239 adult 1995). The migratory nominate subspecies win- male Pine Bunting x Yellowhammer hybrids ters mostly in Afghanistan, Pakistan, north-west- studied in the hand in western Siberia, as many ern India, Nepal and northern China; less impor- as 58 were only identifiable as such by the yel- tant wintering areas include northern Iran, the low lesser underwing-coverts.