DOCSLIB.ORG

Race 1 1 1 2 2 3 2 4 3 5 3 6 4 7 4 8 5 9 5 10

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Race 1 1 1 2 2 3 2 4 3 5 3 6 4 7 4 8 5 9 5 10 CHUKYO SUNDAY,MARCH 24TH Post Time 10:05 1 ! Race Dirt 1800m THREE−YEAR−OLDS Course Record:5Jul.14 1:48.9 F&M DES,WEIGHT FOR AGE,MAIDEN Value of race: 9,550,000 Yen 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th Added Money(Yen) 5,000,000 2,000,000 1,300,000 750,000 500,000 Stakes Money(Yen) 0 0 0 Ow. Hiroaki Kawai 700,000 S 00000 Life30003M 10001 1 54.0 Takuya Ono(7.4%,14−21−14−141,18th) Turf20002 I 20002 1 Maria Rouge(JPN) Dirt10001L 00000 /Belshazzar(0.44) /Brian’s Time F3,br. Yoshihiro Hatakeyama(7.0%,4−4−4−45,84th) Course10001E 00000 Wht. 0Erimo Shiny 0Erimo Chic 4May.16 Kawakami Bokujo Wet 00000 10Mar.19 CHUKYO MDN D1800St 1111 1:58.210th/11Atsuya Nishimura 51.0 446% Belliqueuse 1:55.4 <1 3/4> Amaryllis Tesoro <2 1/2> Eternal Diva 25Nov.18 TOKYO MDN T2000Fi 3 3 3 2:02.4 10th/13 Kazuki Kikuzawa 52.0 434( Vanlandi 2:00.3 <3/4> Saint Leonard <3/4> Leone d’Oro 11Nov.18 TOKYO NWC T2000Fi 1 1 1 2:09.1 5th/10 Yutaro Nonaka 51.0 444' Satono Radius 2:08.3 <3/4> Trickster <2> Akino Komachi Ow. Hiroharu Kurimoto 750,000 S 00000 Life60006M 60006 1 51.0 Heart Kameda(6.3%,1−0−0−15,107th) Turf00000 I 00000 2 Kurino Kurumichan(JPN) Dirt60006L 00000 /Victoire Pisa(0.80) /Dehere F3,g. Hidemasa Nakao(8.2%,4−4−3−38,86th) Course00000E 00000 Wht. 0Charmander 0Expressive Dance 11Mar.16 Hidaka Taiyo Bokujo Wet 00000 2Mar.19 HANSHIN MDN D1800Go 10 10 9 9 1:56.8 9th/12 Akatsuki Tomita 53.0 474 ( Opus Maker 1:54.8 <1 1/2> Wine Red Rose <NK> Meisho Kasuga 26Jan.19 KYOTO MDN D1800St 5577 1:58.06th/8ToshikiHattori51.0478% Meisho Azteca 1:56.3 <NK> Wine Red Rose <1 3/4> Meisho Otowa 5Jan.19 KYOTO MDN D1800St 13 13 15 12 1:56.3 4th/16 Toshiki Hattori 51.0 482, Water Space 1:54.7 <8> Plique a Jour <3/4> Lodz 17Nov.18 KYOTO MDN D1400St 16 16 1:27.7 7th/16 Toshiki Hattori 51.0 478- Red le Zele 1:25.0 <DS> Peace Prayer <2 1/2> Oken Love Luna 4Nov.18 KYOTO MDN D1400St 8 8 1:29.0 10th/10 Osamu Shimohara 54.0 478( Copano Martin 1:26.5 <1> Kyowa Driven <NK> Meiner Precise Ow. Hirosaki Toshihiro HD Co.,Ltd. 0 S 00000 Life10001M 10001 2 54.0 Takuma Ogino(0%,0−0−3−26,125th) Turf10001 I 00000 3 Jane Jane(JPN) Dirt00000L 00000 /Victoire Pisa(0.80) /Cozzene F3,b. Tomoyuki Umeda(5.7%,4−7−7−52,76th) Course00000E 00000 Blk. 0A Shin Harbor 0Echo Harbor 3May.16 KK Eishindo Wet 00000 14Jan.19 KYOTO NWC T1600Fi 13 14 1:39.6 14th/15 Takuma Ogino 54.0 490* Guevara 1:36.6 <1> Best Charm <4> Top of Major Ow. U.Taiki Farm 0 S 00000 Life10001M 10001 2 54.0 Takashi Fujikake(7.4%,4−3−4−43,53rd) Turf10001 I 00000 4 Il Fait Soleil(JPN) Dirt00000L 00000 /Dunkirk(0.43) /Fuji Kiseki F3,g. To m o k a z u Ta k a n o (12.0%,9−8−6−52,14th) Course00000E 00000 Blk. 0Taiki Soleil 0Taiki Twinkle 5May.16 Victory Horse Ranch Inc. Wet 00000 3Mar.19 HANSHIN MDN T1600Fi 7 7 1:36.0 9th/16 Kyosuke Kokubun 54.0 436. King of Koji 1:34.0 <1 1/4> Le Cheile <1 3/4> Le Belier Ow. Basic Co.,Ltd. 2,800,000 S 30003 Life60105M 30102 3 51.0 Ikuya Kowata(1.9%,2−4−8−91,73rd) Turf40103 I 00000 5 Green Tea(JPN) Dirt20002L 00000 /Kinshasa no Kiseki(1.03)/Harbinger F3,b. To s h i a k i Ta j i m a (1.6%,1−1−4−58,163rd) Course10001E 00000 Red 0Miss Right 0Cats 1Apr.16 Basic Ltd Wet 00000 16Mar.19 CHUKYO MDN D1200St 14 15 1:16.8 14th/15 Takeshi Yokoyama 53.0 426) Top Winner 1:13.2 <7> Kinsho Biko <1/2> Denko Brave 23Feb.19 NAKAYAMA MDN D1200St 10 10 1:14.7 7th/16 Yutaro Nonaka 52.0 430' Diletto 1:12.8 <2> Cacio e Pepe <NK> Sandersonia 18Nov.18 TOKYO MDN T1800Fi 1 1 1 1:52.0 16th/16 Takayuki Kato 54.0 416+ Krasavitsa 1:49.8 <2 1/2> Frozen Night <1 1/2> Curren Bouquetd’or 3Nov.18 FUKUSHIMA MDN T1200Fi 9 8 1:10.0 8th/16 Takayuki Kato 54.0 416( Natala Diva 1:09.2 <1 3/4> Doux Champagne <NK> Mozu Baby 19Aug.18 NIIGATA MDN T1400Fi 7 6 1:23.1 10th/18 Takayuki Kato 54.0 424! Shadow Session 1:21.8 <1 3/4> Win Refinado <3/4> Marorin Ow. Apollo Thoroughbred Club 0 S 20002 Life20002M 00000 3 54.0 Tetsuya Kobayashi(0%,0−0−0−11,139th) Turf00000 I 00000 6 Apollo Hope(JPN) Dirt20002L 00000 /Apollo Kingdom(0.23) /Bubble Gum Fellow F3,g. Kenji Yamauchi(6.8%,5−5−2−62,61st) Course00000E 00000 Red 0Snow Ado 0Feriado 5Mar.16 Taniguchi Bokujo Wet 00000 9Mar.19 HANSHIN MDN D1200Go 6 6 1:14.4 8th/15 Tetsuya Kobayashi 54.0 518' Smart Athena 1:12.8 <2> Meisho Yawaragi <1 3/4> Namura Machli 17Nov.18 KYOTO NWC D1200St 15 15 1:15.1 13th/16 Hayato Mitsuya 51.0 508, Mont Perdu 1:12.3 <5> Mozu Capriccio <NK> Meisho Meirin Ow. Masazumi Tanikawa 0 S 00000 Life20002M 20002 4 51.0 Keishi Yamada(1.2%,1−4−4−73,91st) Turf00000 I 00000 7 Eri Bel(JPN) Dirt20002L 00000 /Belshazzar(0.44) /Tanino Gimlet F3,b. Yasuo Takeichi(2.7%,2−3−4−64,134th) Course00000E 00000 Blu. 0Miyabi Lily 0Rinden Shirayuri 14Mar.16 Hideki Nakata Wet 00000 17Mar.19 NAKAYAMA MDN D1800St 11 11 12 13 2:01.7 14th/15 Kazuki Kikuzawa 52.0 454, Time Remembered 1:57.3 <1 1/2> Nishino Amaze <1/2> Major Seventh 16Feb.19 TOKYO NWC D1400St 13 13 1:33.0 15th/16 Franck Blondel 54.0 462) Chibatarian 1:27.7 <HD> Meisho Kasuga <1 1/2> Nobo Oriens Ow. Kazuhiko Numakawa 2,900,000 S 00000 Life70016M 50014 4 54.0 Daisaku Matsuda(4.3%,3−4−3−59,63rd) Turf30003 I 20002 8 Peptide Fushicho(JPN) Dirt40013L 00000 /Rulership(1.30) /Kurofune F3,b. Hidenori Take(1.9%,1−7−2−44,155th) Course20011E 00000 Blu. 0Peptide Hinotori 0Hornet Pierce 14Mar.16 Kazuhiko Numakawa Wet 10001 26Jan.19 CHUKYO MDN D1800St 4354 1:57.83rd/12Daisaku Matsuda 54.0 434$ Grass Milky 1:57.5 <1> A Shin Columbia <3/4> Peptide Fushicho 20Jan.19 CHUKYO MDN D1800St 8899 1:57.87th/14Daisaku Matsuda 54.0 442" Leo Beyond 1:56.5 <1 1/2> Starry Parade <3> Create the Life 5Jan.19 KYOTO MDN D1800St 11 11 10 8 1:56.4 6th/16 Akatsuki Tomita 52.0 442) Water Space 1:54.7 <8> Plique a Jour <3/4> Lodz 6Oct.18 KYOTO MDN T1400Fi 9 8 1:23.7 8th/10 Hirofumi Shii 54.0 444& Meisho Onite 1:22.3 <3/4> Prom <NK> Heavenly Wind 22Sep.18 HANSHIN MDN D1800Sl 9965 1:53.45th/13HirofumiShii 54.0444# Meisho Sotetsu 1:52.3 <1/2> Taisei Scat <NK> Great Banyan Ow. Kieffers Co.,Ltd. 0 S 00000 Life00000M 00000 5 54.0 Yutaka Take(18.6%,32−22−21−97,2nd) Turf00000 I 00000 9 Nautilus(JPN) Dirt00000L 00000 /Orfevre(0.78) /Silver Deputy F3,ch. Mikio Matsunaga(13.9%,10−11−8−43,7th) Course00000E 00000 Ylw. 0Malvern Spring 0Chelsey Flower 17Mar.16 Mishima Bokujo Wet 00000 Ow. Chigira Bokujo 0 S 00000 Life30003M 30003 5 51.0 Kaito Otsuka(0%,0−0−0−13,145th) Turf10001 I 00000 10 May Sophia(JPN) Dirt20002L 00000 /Symboli Kris S(0.55) /Agnes Tachyon F3,d.b. Kazuhiro Seishi(8.6%,3−0−2−30,120th) Course00000E 00000 Ylw. 0May Wind 0Tranquility 6Mar.16 Chigira Bokujo Wet 00000 24Feb.19 NAKAYAMA MDN D1800St 7778 2:00.212th/16TakuyaOno 54.0476) Logical Girl 1:56.7 <NS> Effleurage <3> Guriguri 16Dec.18 NAKAYAMA MDN D1800St 13 13 1111 1:59.1 8th/16 Miyabi Muto 53.0 488' Maple Garden 1:57.1 <3/4> June Ballad <1/2> Monstrum 17Nov.18 TOKYO NWC T1600Fi 13 12 1:38.7 9th/14 Takuya Ono 54.0 484* Aqua Mirabilis 1:37.2 <1 1/4> Sweet Scent <2 1/2> Galocher Ow. Laurel Racing Co,.Ltd. 1,800,000 S 60006 Life1200111M 60015 6 B 51.0 Atsuya Nishimura(8.8%,13−12−15−108,21st) Turf50005 I 00000 11 Lodz(JPN) Dirt70016L 00000 -Rose Kingdom(0.52) -Dehere F3,b. Daisuke Takayanagi(9.2%,6−8−10−41,35th) Course10001E 00000 Grn. .Szybka Klacz .Le Prospect 14Mar.16 Harumi Tanaka Wet 00000 10Feb.19 KOKURA MDN D1700Go9998 1:50.77th/10KenjiKawamata53.0426% Novella 1:49.1 <NS> Hush Go Go <NK> Shosan Ciruela 19Jan.19 CHUKYO MDN D1800St 14 13 14 13 1:59.1 7th/15 Fuma Matsuwaka 54.0 438% Tivoli Drive 1:57.1 <NK> Belliqueuse <3 1/2> Apollo Morrighan 5Jan.19 KYOTO MDN D1800St 16 15 13 8 1:56.1 3rd/16 Kyosuke Kokubun 54.0 438) Water Space 1:54.7 <8> Plique a Jour <3/4> Lodz 2Dec.18 HANSHIN MDN D1800St 10 10 9 9 1:56.7 5th/11 Kyosuke Kokubun 54.0 434' Tanino Mica 1:54.8 <3> Broadhurst <4> Meisho Yawaragi 3Nov.18 FUKUSHIMA MDN D1700St 9 11 13 11 1:50.8 6th/14 Atsuya Nishimura 51.0 432* Latericius 1:49.9 <1 1/4> Belliqueuse <1 3/4> Miracle Tune Ow.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Orbital Lifetime Predictions
    Orbital LIFETIME PREDICTIONS An ASSESSMENT OF model-based BALLISTIC COEFfiCIENT ESTIMATIONS AND ADJUSTMENT FOR TEMPORAL DRAG co- EFfiCIENT VARIATIONS M.R. HaneVEER MSc Thesis Aerospace Engineering Orbital lifetime predictions An assessment of model-based ballistic coecient estimations and adjustment for temporal drag coecient variations by M.R. Haneveer to obtain the degree of Master of Science at the Delft University of Technology, to be defended publicly on Thursday June 1, 2017 at 14:00 PM. Student number: 4077334 Project duration: September 1, 2016 – June 1, 2017 Thesis committee: Dr. ir. E. N. Doornbos, TU Delft, supervisor Dr. ir. E. J. O. Schrama, TU Delft ir. K. J. Cowan MBA TU Delft An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. Summary Objects in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) experience low levels of drag due to the interaction with the outer layers of Earth’s atmosphere. The atmospheric drag reduces the velocity of the object, resulting in a gradual decrease in altitude. With each decayed kilometer the object enters denser portions of the atmosphere accelerating the orbit decay until eventually the object cannot sustain a stable orbit anymore and either crashes onto Earth’s surface or burns up in its atmosphere. The capability of predicting the time an object stays in orbit, whether that object is space junk or a satellite, allows for an estimate of its orbital lifetime - an estimate satellite op- erators work with to schedule science missions and commercial services, as well as use to prove compliance with international agreements stating no passively controlled object is to orbit in LEO longer than 25 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights in Space 2010
    International Astronautical Federation Committee on Space Research International Institute of Space Law 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren c/o CNES 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren UNITED NATIONS 75015 Paris, France 2 place Maurice Quentin 75015 Paris, France Tel: +33 1 45 67 42 60 Fax: +33 1 42 73 21 20 Tel. + 33 1 44 76 75 10 E-mail: : [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Fax. + 33 1 44 76 74 37 URL: www.iislweb.com OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS URL: www.iafastro.com E-mail: [email protected] URL : http://cosparhq.cnes.fr Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law The United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs is responsible for promoting international cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space and assisting developing countries in using space science and technology. United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs P. O. Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: (+43-1) 26060-4950 Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5830 E-mail: [email protected] URL: www.unoosa.org United Nations publication Printed in Austria USD 15 Sales No. E.11.I.3 ISBN 978-92-1-101236-1 ST/SPACE/57 *1180239* V.11-80239—January 2011—775 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS UNITED NATIONS OFFICE AT VIENNA Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law Progress in space science, technology and applications, international cooperation and space law UNITED NATIONS New York, 2011 UniTEd NationS PUblication Sales no.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Satellite Doldrums
    25 Years of Small Satellites AC4/5 MISSION Siegfried Janson The Aerospace Corporation Presented August 9, 2011 © The Aerospace© The Aerospace Corporation Corporation 2010 2011 Microsatellite Launch History: Last 25 years Microsatellite launch rates rose rapidly in the early 1960’s, and peaked in 1965. Non-Strela microsatellite launch rates hit bottom from 1977 to 1987; the “Small 2 Satellite Doldrums”. They’ve recovered over the past 25 years. Nanosatellite Launch History: About 3 nanosatellites were launched per year during the first decade of space exploration. Launch rates hit zero between 1972 to 1989, but stabilized at ~2 per year 3 through 2002. The CubeSat paradigm has enabled a rapid rise in launch rates. Picosatellite Launch History: Only two active picosatellites were flown before 2000. The Stanford Orbiting Picosatellite Automated Launcher (OPAL) ejected 6 picosatellites into orbit, kicking- st 4 off a 21 century return of picosatellites and the CubeSat Era. Small Satellite Launch History: The First 30 years • The 1960’s: Boom and Bust - Small satellite launch rates rapidly increase in early 1960’s as the Space Age unfolds - Small satellite launch rates decrease in latter half of decade as launch vehicle throw weight capability increases and satellites get bigger (on average). • The 1970’s: Soviet Microsatellites Dominate - Strela-1M constellation deployed; it eventually requires over 300 spacecraft - Western small satellite launch rates continue to decline as satellites grow in size • The 1980’s: Small Satellite Doldrums (1977-1987) - No nanosatellites or picosatellites launched - Less than 5 Western microsatellites launched per year - DARPA initiates LightSat program; holds workshop in 1987 - First AIAA/USU Small Satellite Conference in 1987 - “Doldrums” end in 1987 By 1986, the Soviet Union was actively launching military communications microsatellites, but the rest of the world was experiencing a dearth of new small 5 satellites.
    [Show full text]
  • Prototype Design and Mission Analysis for a Small Satellite Exploiting Environmental Disturbances for Attitude Stabilization
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis and Dissertation Collection 2016-03 Prototype design and mission analysis for a small satellite exploiting environmental disturbances for attitude stabilization Polat, Halis C. Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/48578 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS PROTOTYPE DESIGN AND MISSION ANALYSIS FOR A SMALL SATELLITE EXPLOITING ENVIRONMENTAL DISTURBANCES FOR ATTITUDE STABILIZATION by Halis C. Polat March 2016 Thesis Advisor: Marcello Romano Co-Advisor: Stephen Tackett Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704–0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED (Leave blank) March 2016 Master’s thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS PROTOTYPE DESIGN AND MISSION ANALYSIS FOR A SMALL SATELLITE EXPLOITING ENVIRONMENTAL DISTURBANCES FOR ATTITUDE STABILIZATION 6. AUTHOR(S) Halis C. Polat 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION REPORT Monterey, CA 93943-5000 NUMBER 9.
    [Show full text]
  • H-2 Family Home Launch Vehicles Japan
    Please make a donation to support Gunter's Space Page. Thank you very much for visiting Gunter's Space Page. I hope that this site is useful a nd informative for you. If you appreciate the information provided on this site, please consider supporting my work by making a simp le and secure donation via PayPal. Please help to run the website and keep everything free of charge. Thank you very much. H-2 Family Home Launch Vehicles Japan H-2 (ETS 6) [NASDA] H-2 with SSB (SFU / GMS 5) [NASDA] H-2S (MTSat 1) [NASDA] H-2A-202 (GPM) [JAXA] 4S fairing H-2A-2022 (SELENE) [JAXA] H-2A-2024 (MDS 1 / VEP 3) [NASDA] H-2A-204 (ETS 8) [JAXA] H-2B (HTV 3) [JAXA] Version Strap-On Stage 1 Stage 2 H-2 (2 × SRB) 2 × SRB LE-7 LE-5A H-2 (2 × SRB, 2 × SSB) 2 × SRB LE-7 LE-5A 2 × SSB H-2S (2 × SRB) 2 × SRB LE-7 LE-5B H-2A-1024 * 2 × SRB-A LE-7A - 4 × Castor-4AXL H-2A-202 2 × SRB-A LE-7A LE-5B H-2A-2022 2 × SRB-A LE-7A LE-5B 2 × Castor-4AXL H-2A-2024 2 × SRB-A LE-7A LE-5B 4 × Castor-4AXL H-2A-204 4 × SRB-A LE-7A LE-5B H-2A-212 ** 1 LRB / 2 LE-7A LE-7A LE-5B 2 × SRB-A H-2A-222 ** 2 LRB / 2 × 2 LE-7A LE-7A LE-5B 2 × SRB-A H-2A-204A ** 4 × SRB-A LE-7A Widebody / LE-5B H-2A-222A ** 2 LRB / 2 × LE-7A LE-7A Widebody / LE-5B 2 × SRB-A H-2B-304 4 × SRB-A Widebody / 2 LE-7A LE-5B H-2B-304A ** 4 × SRB-A Widebody / 2 LE-7A Widebody / LE-5B * = suborbital ** = under stud y Performance (kg) LEO LPEO SSO GTO GEO MolO IP H-2 (2 × SRB) 3800 H-2 (2 × SRB, 2 × SSB) 3930 H-2S (2 × SRB) 4000 H-2A-1024 - - - - - - - H-2A-202 10000 4100 H-2A-2022 4500 H-2A-2024 5000 H-2A-204 6000 H-2A-212
    [Show full text]
  • A Sample AMS Latex File
    PLEASE SEE CORRECTED APPENDIX A IN CORRIGENDUM, JOSS VOL. 6, NO. 3, DECEMBER 2017 Zea, L. et al. (2016): JoSS, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 483–511 (Peer-reviewed article available at www.jossonline.com) www.DeepakPublishing.com www. JoSSonline.com A Methodology for CubeSat Mission Selection Luis Zea, Victor Ayerdi, Sergio Argueta, and Antonio Muñoz Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala Abstract Over 400 CubeSats have been launched during the first 13 years of existence of this 10 cm cube-per unit standard. The CubeSat’s flexibility to use commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) parts and its standardization of in- terfaces have reduced the cost of developing and operating space systems. This is evident by satellite design projects where at least 95 universities and 18 developing countries have been involved. Although most of these initial projects had the sole mission of demonstrating that a space system could be developed and operated in- house, several others had scientific missions on their own. The selection of said mission is not a trivial process, however, as the cost and benefits of different options need to be carefully assessed. To conduct this analysis in a systematic and scholarly fashion, a methodology based on maximizing the benefits while considering program- matic risk and technical feasibility was developed for the current study. Several potential mission categories, which include remote sensing and space-based research, were analyzed for their technical requirements and fea- sibility to be implemented on CubeSats. The methodology helps compare potential missions based on their rele- vance, risk, required resources, and benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal Analysis of a Small Satellite in Post- Mission Phase
    Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology (JMEST) ISSN: 2458-9403 Vol. 6 Issue 2, February - 2019 Thermal Analysis of a Small Satellite in Post- Mission Phase Ahmed Elhefnawy Ahmed Elweteedy Space Technology Center Military Technical College Cairo, Egypt Cairo, Egypt [email protected] [email protected] Abstract— The objective of satellite thermal perigee altitude of 354 km, an apogee altitude of 1447 control is maintaining all satellite components km and an inclination of 71˚. A passive thermal control within their operational temperature range for system was used, with a small electric heater for the different missions. Most small satellites are battery. Thermal models were developed within both designed to have passive thermal control system. MATLAB/Simulink and ESATAN/ESARAD In this paper the thermal analysis of a small environments. satellite in post-mission phase is introduced. The Dinh [4] illustrated the modeling of a nanosatellite European Student Earth Orbiter (ESEO) satellite using Thermal Desktop software. The satellite has a was chosen in this study. This phase starts at the passive thermal control system. It was designed to end of the operational phase and should last at operate in LEO with altitude of 400 km. least 2 years for the chosen satellite. A finite Bulut et al [5] described the thermal control system difference thermal model using a commercial of Turksat-3U Nanosatellite [6]. The satellite orbit is software “Thermal Desktop” was described for the sun-synchronous orbit with altitude 600 km and selected satellite. Model results verification were inclination 98˚. The satellite has passive thermal performed by varying design variables and seeing control system.
    [Show full text]
  • And Cubesats) Has Come: Analyzing the Numbers
    SSC13-IX-01 The Long-Threatened Flood of University-Class Spacecraft (and CubeSats) Has Come: Analyzing the Numbers Michael Swartwout Saint Louis University 3450 Lindell Boulevard St. Louis, Missouri 63103; (314) 977-8240 [email protected] ABSTRACT We have covered the statistical history of university-class small satellites for nearly a decade, revisiting the numbers every two years. In every previous paper, we have promised/threatened that the number of university-class missions will increase, only to spend the next paper explaining why that flood has not happened – but is definitely going to happen next year. This year, at last, we can break the cycle: the flood of university-class spacecraft has come, in the form of CubeSats; more than 30 are known to be manifested for 2013, with equal (or greater) numbers for 2014. For this paper, we will revise previous studies in two ways: 1) Include the results of the past two years, which will show a continued upward trend in the number of university- class missions, a continued downward trend in the size of the spacecraft, and a not-so-continued dominance of the flagship universities. Have we hit a second turning point in the history of CubeSats, where they switch from novelties to actually-useful missions? (The preliminary answer: maybe.) 2) Expand the study to consider other small spacecraft mission types: specifically the professionally-built CubeSats. We will perform side-by-side comparison of the two. The results will be used in a brave but ultimately naive attempt to predict the next few years in university-class and CubeSat-class flights: numbers, capabilities, and mix of participants.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Operational Losses in Space Launch
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE FINANCIAL OPERATIONAL LOSSES IN SPACE LAUNCH A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By TOM ROBERT BOONE, IV Norman, Oklahoma 2017 FINANCIAL OPERATIONAL LOSSES IN SPACE LAUNCH A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE SCHOOL OF AEROSPACE AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING BY Dr. David Miller, Chair Dr. Alfred Striz Dr. Peter Attar Dr. Zahed Siddique Dr. Mukremin Kilic c Copyright by TOM ROBERT BOONE, IV 2017 All rights reserved. \For which of you, intending to build a tower, sitteth not down first, and counteth the cost, whether he have sufficient to finish it?" Luke 14:28, KJV Contents 1 Introduction1 1.1 Overview of Operational Losses...................2 1.2 Structure of Dissertation.......................4 2 Literature Review9 3 Payload Trends 17 4 Launch Vehicle Trends 28 5 Capability of Launch Vehicles 40 6 Wastage of Launch Vehicle Capacity 49 7 Optimal Usage of Launch Vehicles 59 8 Optimal Arrangement of Payloads 75 9 Risk of Multiple Payload Launches 95 10 Conclusions 101 10.1 Review of Dissertation........................ 101 10.2 Future Work.............................. 106 Bibliography 108 A Payload Database 114 B Launch Vehicle Database 157 iv List of Figures 3.1 Payloads By Orbit, 2000-2013.................... 20 3.2 Payload Mass By Orbit, 2000-2013................. 21 3.3 Number of Payloads of Mass, 2000-2013.............. 21 3.4 Total Mass of Payloads in kg by Individual Mass, 2000-2013... 22 3.5 Number of LEO Payloads of Mass, 2000-2013........... 22 3.6 Number of GEO Payloads of Mass, 2000-2013..........
    [Show full text]
  • Satellites Frequency List Update
    All Satellites Frequency List Update 30 Sept 2013, Latest Update by JE9PEL Satellite Number Uplink Downlink Beacon Mode Callsign Active ------------ ----- ----------- ----------- ------- ----------------- ------------ ------ AO-1 (Oscar-1) 00214 . 144.983 CW AO-2 (Oscar-2) 00305 . 144.983 CW AO-3 (Oscar-3) 01293 145.975-146.025 144.325-375 . SSB,CW AO-4 (Oscar-4) 01902 432.145-155 144.300-310 . SSB,CW AO-5 (Oscar-5) 04321 . 29.450 144.050 CW AO-6 (Phase-2A) 06236 145.900-999 29.450-550 . SSB,CW AO-7 (Phase-2B) 07530 145.850-950 29.400-500 29.502 A * AO-7 (Phase-2B) 07530 432.125-175 145.975-925 145.970 B,C * AO-7 (Phase-2B) 07530 . 2304.100 435.100 D(RTTY) AO-8 (Phase-2D) 10703 145.850-900 29.400-500 29.402 SSB,CW AO-8 (Phase-2D) 10703 145.900-999 435.200-100 435.095 SSB,CW UO-9 (UoSAT-1) 12888 . 145.825/435.025 2401.000 SSB,CW AO-10 (Phase-3B) 14129 435.030-180 145.975-825 145.810 SSB,CW UO-11 (UoSAT-2) 14781 . 145.826/435.025 2401.500 (V)FM,(S)PSK UOSAT-2 * MIR 16609 145.985 145.985 145.985 Packet R0MIR-1 RS-12 (Sputnik) 21089 21.210-250 29.410-450 29.408 SSB,CW RS-13 (Sputnik) 21089 21.260-300 145.860-900 145.862 SSB,CW AO-13 (Phase-3C) 19216 435.423-573 145.975-825 145.812 SSB,CW UO-14 (UoSAT-3) 20437 145.975 435.070 .
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting
    DELAY TOLERANT NETWORKING FOR CUBESAT TOPOLOGIES AND PLATFORMS By PAUL MURI A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2013 1 © 2013 Paul Muri 2 To my beloved parents, Theresa Muri and David Muri; and to my colleagues, friends, and family who believe in me 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my sincerest gratitude to my academic advisor, Prof. Janise McNair, for her invaluable guidance and continuous support throughout my undergrad and graduate studies at the University of Florida. Her openness and encouragement of my ideas helped me become a better researcher. Without her excellent advice, patience, and support, this doctoral dissertation would not be possible. I would like to thank all of my committee members, Prof. Jenshan Lin, Prof. Jasmeet Judge, and Prof. Norman Fitz-Coy, for serving on my committee. The committee’s valuable comments and constructive criticism helped to improve this dissertation greatly. I also would like extend my appreciation to the Wireless and Mobile System laboratory colleagues. They always gave me valuable suggestions, generous support, and fruitful “jam sessions” during my graduate studies at the University of Florida. I thank all of my labmates, Gokul Bhat, Obul Challa, Max Xiang Mao, Sherry Xiaoyuan Li, Jing Qin, Jose Alomodovar, Krishna Chaitanya, Dante Buckley, Ritwik Dubey, Bom Leenhapat Navaravong, Dexiang Wang, Jing Jing Pan, Gustavo Vejarano, Seshupriya Alluru, Eric Graves, and Corey Baker, in no particular order. All of them made my days in the lab more enjoyable.
    [Show full text]
  • A Multiple Payload
    Hi this is Steve Nerlich from Cheap Astronomy www.cheapastro.com and this is A multiple payload. There is an HIIA rocket launch planned for May 18 2010 from the Tanegashima Space Center, on the island of Tanegashima, which is south of the most of the rest of Japan. The HIIA rocket’s primary payload is the Akatsuki mission to Venus, developed by the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency - or JAXA. But, as an example of the principle of why launch just one thing when you can launch six, the mission will include the world's first interplanetary solar sail, the UNITEC-1 probe and three pico-satellites. But let’s start with Akatsuki, also known as the Venus Climate Orbiter. If the 18th of May launch goes according to plan, this 640kg spacecraft, fitted with hydrazine thrusters and solar arrays for electrical power, will arrive at Venus in December 2010 and enter a highly elliptical orbit for a science mission that will last at least 2 years. Akatsuki's science goals include trying to understand Venus’ meteorology - including how the atmosphere formed and why it screams around the planet at such a phenomenal rate – much faster than the planet spins, although still in the same direction as that spin. Also, Akatsuki will look for any evidence of active volcanic activity on the surface of Venus. Akatsuki will scan Venus’ atmosphere, monitoring different wavelengths from infra-red to ultra-violet with the hope of gaining cross-sectional views of the atmosphere at different altitudes. From right at the top at 90 kilometres altitude, down to the cloud tops at about 65 kilometres altitude and then all the way down to 0 kilometres altitude.
    [Show full text]