DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Content

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Content Table of Content TABLE OF CONTENT ............................................................................................................................... 1 LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................................ 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................. 7 1.2 PURPOSE OF THE EIA ............................................................................................................... 7 1.3 SCOPE OF THE EIA ....................................................................................................................... 7 2. ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS ............................................................................................ 8 2.1 ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL OF ZAMBIA ....................................................................................... 8 2.2 DEPARTMENT OF WATER AFFAIRS. .............................................................................................. 9 2.3 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ............................................................................................................ 9 2.4 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ...................................................................................... 9 2.5 DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY......................................................................................................... 9 2.6 LOCAL AUTHORITIES ................................................................................................................. 10 2.7 NATIONAL PARKS AND WILDLIFE SERVICES .............................................................................. 10 2.8 DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES ....................................................................................................... 10 2.9 MINISTRY OF LANDS .................................................................................................................. 10 2.10 MINISTRY OF MINES AND MINERAL DEVELOPMENT .................................................................. 10 2.11 NATIONAL HERITAGE CONSERVATION COMMISSION ................................................................. 11 2.12 INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION AND PROTOCOLS ....................................................................... 11 3. NEED FOR PROPOSED ACTION ................................................................................................ 11 3.1 IMPORTANCE OF THE HYDROPOWER PROJECT ............................................................................ 11 3.3 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT .............................................................................. 13 3.4 THE DO-NOTHING OPTION ......................................................................................................... 15 3.5 POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF THE PROJECT ....................................................................................... 15 3.6 STUDY AREA .............................................................................................................................. 15 4. SCOPING OF THE PUBLIC HEARING MEETINGS ................................................................ 17 4.1 CONSULTATIVE MEETINGS WITH STAKEHOLDERS IN MUSUNGWA AND KAINGO VILLAGES ...... 17 4.2 CONSULTATIVE MEETING WITH INSTITUTIONS OPERATING IN ITEZHI – TEZHI .......................... 18 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................. 19 5.1 ITEZHI TEZHI DAM ..................................................................................................................... 19 5.2 INTAKE AND HEADRACE TUNNEL MODIFICATION. ..................................................................... 21 5.3 POWERHOUSE ............................................................................................................................. 21 5.4 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ......................................................................................................... 21 5.5 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT ........................................................................................................... 22 5.6 SWITCHING AND TRANSMISSION LINES ...................................................................................... 23 5.7 WORK FORCE AND HOUSING...................................................................................................... 23 5.8 OPERATING MODE ..................................................................................................................... 23 6. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................. 24 6.1 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT .......................................................................................................... 24 6.1.1 Geology ................................................................................................................................. 24 6.1.2 Seismicity ................................................................................................................................... 25 6.1.3 Topography ........................................................................................................................... 26 6.1.4 Soils ...................................................................................................................................... 27 6.1.5 Climate ................................................................................................................................. 27 1 6.1.6 Hydrology ............................................................................................................................. 27 6.1.7 Significant pollutant sources ................................................................................................ 28 6.2 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT ...................................................................................................... 29 6.2.1 Flora ..................................................................................................................................... 29 6.2.1.1 Dry Deciduous Forest ............................................................................................................. 29 6.2.1.2 Riparian Woodland ................................................................................................................. 30 6.2.1.3 Open Forest with Grass .......................................................................................................... 31 6.2.1.4 Termitaria ............................................................................................................................... 34 6.2.1.5 Grassland ................................................................................................................................ 35 6.2.2 Fauna .................................................................................................................................... 36 6.2.2.1 Mammals ................................................................................................................................. 36 6.2.3 Birds ........................................................................................................................................... 38 6.2.4 Reptiles ................................................................................................................................. 38 6.2.5 Rodents ................................................................................................................................. 38 6.2.6 Fish ....................................................................................................................................... 39 6.3 SOCIAL-CULTURAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................ 42 6.3.1 General Characteristics of Reservoir Population ................................................................ 42 6.3.2 Settlement Pattern ................................................................................................................. 43 6.3.4 Demography ......................................................................................................................... 44 6.3.4 Economy ............................................................................................................................... 45 6.3.5 Land Tenure .......................................................................................................................... 45 6.3.6 Land Use ............................................................................................................................... 45 6.3.6.1 Agriculture ....................................................................................................................... 45 6.3.6.2 Fisheries .......................................................................................................................... 46 6.3.6.3 Mining .............................................................................................................................. 46 6.3.6.4 Tourism ...........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) Categories Approved by Recommendation 4.7, As Amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the Conference of the Contracting Parties
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7, as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the Conference of the Contracting Parties. Note for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Bureau. Compilers are strongly urged to provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of maps. 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. DD MM YY Zambia Wildlife Authority Private Bag 1 Designation date Site Reference Number Chilanga, Zambia Email: [email protected] Tel: 260-01-278365 or 278335 Fax: 260-01-278299 or 278365 2. Date this sheet was completed/updated: 02 September 2005 3. Country: Zambia 4. Name of the Ramsar site: LUKANGA SWAMPS 5. Map of site included: Refer to Annex III of the Explanatory Note and Guidelines, for detailed guidance on provision of suitable maps. a) hard copy (required for inclusion of site in the Ramsar List): yes -or- no b) digital (electronic) format (optional): yes -or- no 6. Geographical coordinates (latitude/longitude): 14o 08' - 14o 40'S, 27o 10' - 28o 05'E 7. General location: Include in which part of the country and which large administrative region(s), and the location of the nearest large town. Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS), page 2 The Swamps are found in the Central Province, west of Kabwe town on the east bank of the Kafue River along the stretch between Machiya Ferry and Mswebi.
    [Show full text]
  • An Invasive Species Assessment in Zambia
    Public Document Clearing Kariba weed (Salvinia molesta) from Lukanga Swamp, central Zambia (Image courtesy of BirdLife International) Action on Invasives An invasive species system assessment in Zambia Kate Constantine, Joyce Mulila-Mitti and Frances Williams December 2020 KNOWLEDGE FOR LIFE An invasive species assessment in Zambia Acknowledgements The authors would like to acknowledge the critical contributions of Noah Phiri, Judith Chowa and Ivan Rwomushana towards facilitating this work. CABI is an international intergovernmental organisation, and we gratefully acknowledge the core financial support from our member countries (and lead agencies) including the United Kingdom (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office), China (Chinese Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs), Australia (Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research), Canada (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada), Netherlands (Directorate-General for International Cooperation), and Switzerland (Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation). The Action on Invasives Programme is supported by the United Kingdom Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office and The Netherlands Directorate-General for International Cooperation. This report is the Copyright of CAB International, on behalf of the sponsors of this work where appropriate. It presents unpublished research findings, which should not be used or quoted without written agreement from CAB International. Unless specifically agreed otherwise in writing, all information herein should be treated as confidential. 1 Executive summary Invasive species are a serious and growing problem in Zambia. The objective of this study was to understand the current status of the invasive species system in Zambia and describe, evaluate and assess the responsiveness of the system to address the threat of invasive species to the country. A methodology was developed that identifies areas to address to strengthen the system, as well as a baseline against which changes in responsiveness of the system can be assessed at a later date if required.
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia Managing Water for Sustainable Growth and Poverty Reduction
    A COUNTRY WATER RESOURCES ASSISTANCE STRATEGY FOR ZAMBIA Zambia Public Disclosure Authorized Managing Water THE WORLD BANK 1818 H St. NW Washington, D.C. 20433 for Sustainable Growth and Poverty Reduction Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized THE WORLD BANK Zambia Managing Water for Sustainable Growth and Poverty Reduction A Country Water Resources Assistance Strategy for Zambia August 2009 THE WORLD BANK Water REsOuRcEs Management AfRicA REgion © 2009 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org E-mail: [email protected] All rights reserved The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgement on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete infor- mation to the Copyright Clearance Center Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA; telephone: 978-750-8400; fax: 978-750-4470; Internet: www.copyright.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia REDD+ Strategy (FINAL Ed.) (2).Pdf
    Ministry of Lands, Natural Resources and Forestry Department Environmental Protection ZAMBIA NATIONAL STRATEGY TO REDUCE EMISSIONS FROM DEFORESTATION AND FOREST DEGRADATION (REDD+) January 2015 Patrick W. Matakala, Misael Kokwe and Jochen Statz EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REDD+ is a global mechanism established under the UNFCCC to reduce emissions from tropical deforestation and degradation in developing countries. The REDD+ mechanism has grown to include five activities: reducing emissions from deforestation, reducing emissions from forest degradation, conservation of forest carbon stocks, sustainable management of forests, and enhancement of forest carbon stocks. Forest cover in Zambia comprises around 45 million hectares, or over 60% of the total land area1; the Government of Zambia is aware of the prevailing high deforestation rate in the country, which is estimated between 250,000 – 300,000 hectares per annum. This places Zambia among the top 10 countries with the highest deforestation rates in the world. In pursuit of its long-term development vision (Vision 2030) which emphasizes poverty reduction and development based on “sustainable environment and natural resource management principles”, the Government of Zambia decided in 2009 to participate in REDD as an opportunity to directly address the drivers of deforestation and forest degradation. The proximate drivers of deforestation and forest degradation in Zambia are specific to its forestry, agriculture, energy, mining, and land use (infrastructure development) sectors. They have been identified
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia Ministry of Lands, Natural Resources and Environmental Protection
    Government of the Republic of Zambia Ministry of Lands, Natural Resources and Environmental Protection ZAMBIA’S SECOND NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY AND ACTION PLAN (NBSAP -2) 2015 -2025 FOREWORD The conservation of our environment and its natural resources is of critical importance to Zambia in order to protect our natural heritage. This is not only for purposes of ensuring continued socio-economic development but it is also meant to sustain the important ecological services that our environment and its natural resources provide to us. This approach is also based on our firm belief in inter-generational equity to ensure that we do not deprive future generations of the goods and services that we currently enjoy from our environment and its natural resources. As a result, over the years, the Zambian Government has put in place policies, strategies and programmes that promote conservation of our fauna and flora in the country. For example, we formulated the National Conservation Strategy (NCS) in 1985 which provided a solid base for a coordinated approach to our environmental management culminating into the promulgation of the Environmental Protection and Pollution Control Act No. 12 of 1990. This piece of legislation established the Environmental Council of Zambia (ECZ), now the Zambia Environmental Management Agency (ZEMA) as a statutory body charged with the mandate to regulate environmental management and pollution control, among other things. In 1999, we formulated our first National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP) which we have revised in this Strategy in order to bring it in line with our current development paradigm, respond to new challenges and align it to global frameworks including the Strategic Plan on Biodiversity from 2011 to 2020 and its Aichi Targets.
    [Show full text]
  • No Evidence of a Meteoritic Impact in the Area of the Lukanga Swamp
    Journal of African Earth Sciences 35 (2002) 365–384 www.elsevier.com/locate/jafrearsci Remote sensing, field studies, petrography, and geochemistry of rocks in central Zambia: no evidence of a meteoritic impact in the area of the Lukanga Swamp Crispin Katongo a, Christian Koeberl a,*, Wolf Uwe Reimold b, Singute Mubu c a Institute of Geochemistry, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria b Impact Cratering Research Group, School of Geosciences, University of Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa c Geological Survey Department, P.O. Box 50135, Lusaka, Zambia Accepted 10 October 2002 Abstract The Lukanga Swamp in central Zambia has previously been proposed as the site of a large (52 km diameter) impact structure on the basis of alleged observation of shock-diagnostic planar deformation features (PDFs) in quartz of breccia from the southern margin of the swamp. The southern margin of the swamp, marked by the Nyama Dislocation Zone, consists of quartzite and silicified meta-siltstone, shale, sedimentary quartz breccia, and fault breccia. Structures and textures in the meta-sediments are syn- sedimentary, whereas fault breccia displays tectonic fabrics. In thin section, quartz in sedimentary quartz breccia displays widely spaced, randomly oriented, subparallel, non-planar fluid inclusion trails, which were earlier misidentified to represent decorated PDFs formed by meteoritic impact. Siderophile element abundances (<105 ppm) in the rocks from around the swamp are normal for quartz-rich crustal rocks, and there are no relative enrichments in the breccias compared to other rocks to suggest extraterrestrial contributions. Aeromagnetic data do not reflect an impact crater signature.
    [Show full text]
  • Transformation of Kabwe Into a City the Kabwe We Want Tomorrow
    KABWE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL Transformation of Kabwe into a City The Kabwe we want tomorrow Department of Development Civic Centre: P. O. Box 80424: 2016-2021 Planning Kabwe Disclaimer This report for the Transformation of Kabwe into a City has been written by the Kabwe Municipal Council with advice and guidance from the series of consultative meeting under the Local Economic Development programme supported by Ministry of Local Government and Housing. The Ministry of Local Government and Housing Group do not accept any liability for the accuracy or content of this report. This report is a basis on which the people of Kabwe have stated in the theme ‘the Kabwe we want tomorrow’ towards the process of transforming Kabwe into a city; they do however congratulate the Municipal Team for the quality of this work. i Table of Contents Disclaimer .................................................................................................................................... i Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................... ii Table of Figures ........................................................................................................................... v Table of figures ........................................................................................................................... vi Acronyms................................................................................................................................... vii 1.0 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • The Twa of Zambia's Kafue Flats, Southern Province Itezhi-Tezhi District
    DigitalResources Electronic Survey Report 2016-001 The Twa of Zambia’s Kafue Flats Southern Province Itezhi-Tezhi District Richard Mukang’ombe, Daka Josephat, and Kenneth S. Sawka The Twa of Zambia’s Kafue Flats Southern Province Itezhi-Tezhi District Richard Mukang’ombe, Daka Josephat, and Kenneth S. Sawka SIL International® 2016 SIL Electronic Survey Report 2016-001, December 2016 © 2016 SIL International® All rights reserved Abstract This survey was conducted as part of a larger research project to investigate the language development needs in Zambia. The language group investigated in this particular research is the Twa of Zambia’s Southern Province, Itezhi-Tezhi District. Fieldwork took place during two trips to the Twa areas, one in December of 2012 and one in August of 2013, as well as other contacts with Twa speakers. The main purpose of this research was to research the differences between the Twa of the Kafue Flats and neighboring languages such as Ila and Tonga. Twa is currently listed as a dialect of Tonga in the Ethnologue but the Twa people as well as the Tonga and Ila peoples consider Twa to be a separate language. An additional purpose was to determine the language development needs among the Twa that would include vernacular publications. Some additional information that was collected about the Twa culture is also included in the report. Information was collected mainly by questionnaires, wordlists, and a dialect mapping exercise. The lexical comparisons indicate that Twa of the Kafue Flats is more closely related to Ila than to Tonga. Twa could possibly be closer grammatically to Tonga than to Ila; however, a grammatical comparison of the three languages was not part of this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Human Activities on Zambia's Kafue Flats Ecosystems By
    Effects of Human Activities on Zambia's Kafue Flats Ecosystems by WALTER A. SHEPPE, Ph.D. (British Columbia) Professor of Biology, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio 44325, USA. INTRODUCTION cover of low grasses and was being invaded by woody plants. There were few birds, relatively few Lechwe, and no In May 1967, on the edge of Zambia's Kafue Flats, the other large ungulates (Fig. 2). extensive annual floods were largely hidden by a dense These changes and others in the Kafue River basin are growth of emergent grasses reaching to the horizon. Large the result of a variety of natural or human influences, the herds of Lechwe (Kobus lee he) grazed on the higher ground most important of which was the construction of hydro- around the floodplain and out into the shallow floodwaters. electric dams on the Kafue above and below the Flats. Smaller numbers of Zebra (Equus burchelli), Wildebeest These influences have already caused marked environ- {Connochaetes taurinus), and other ungulates, fed on the mental changes and their long-term effect may be to des- high ground. One of the world's greatest agglomerations of troy much of the rich variety of communities that once avian biomass occupied the floodwaters and the shore occurred along the River. (Fig. 1). This report is based on a twelve-months' study in 1967- . ..; . T*1 *'** " •• ,•' T1 ";»•'•; :* FIG. 1. The edge of the high flood in Lochinvar National Park in May 1967, before construction of the dams. Plentiful Lechwe are feeding in the background on emergent floodplain vegetation and numbers of White Pelicans (Telecanus onocrotalusj and other large birds are in evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded (Figure 18)
    Hydrological Evaluation and Ecosystem Valuation of the Lukanga Swamps Final Report January 2017 Authors J.E. Hunink S. Contreras G. Simons P. Droogers Client The Nature Conservancy FutureWater Report 167 FutureWater Costerweg 1V 6702 AA Wageningen The Netherlands +31 (0)317 460050 [email protected] www.futurewater.nl Preface Zambia’s Ministry of Lands, Natural Resources and Environmental Protection is in the process of defining the policy framework and agenda to guide wetlands management. As part of this planning process, The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is partnering with the Ministry and other stakeholders to develop a management plan for the Lukanga Swamps, which is an important biodiversity area and serves as a major hydrological component of the Kafue basin. FutureWater collaborates with TNC on this project and carries out a hydrological assessment and future hydrological outlook of the Lukanga Swamps. The work should give quantitative insight in the role the swamps play in sustaining hydrological services provided by the swamp and its connection with the Kafue River. This report presents the work done by FutureWater. FutureWater would like to acknowledge staff of TNC and WARMA for their support in completing this study, as well as Max Karen and Hans Beuster for their suggestions at the start of this study. Especially the role of Mundia Matongo, Anne Trainor, Tracy Baker and Colin Apse has made it possible to make this project a successful one that will benefit nature and people in the Lukanga Swamp region. 2 Table of contents 1 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Ecologically Sensitive Sites in Africa. Volume 6
    )C^lu^logically Sensitive Sites ^Africa Volume VI: Southern Africa Botswana Lesotho Malawi MozambiCfue Swaziland Zambia imbabwe Compiled'' by the World Conservation Monitoring Centre •or oild ^> >' * /vfM -^^bSi ^ K^crJ /?^j Ecologically Sensitive Sites in Africa Volume VI: Southern Africa Compiled by World Conservation Monitoring Centre Cambridge, UK for The World Bank Washington DC, USA The World Bank 1993 Published by The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA. Prepared by the World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC), 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL, UK. WCMC is a joint venture between the three partners who developed The World Conservation Strategy and its successor Caring for the Earth: lUCN-World Conservation Union, UNEP-United Nations Environment Programme, and WWF- World Wide Fund for Nature. Its mission is to provide an information, research and assessment service on the status, security and management of the Earth's biological diversity as the basis for its conservation and sustainable use. Copyright: 1993 The World Bank Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior permission from the copyright holder. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: World Bank (1993). Ecologically Sensitive Sites in Africa. Volume VI: Southern Africa. Compiled by the World Conservation Monitoring Centre for The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA. Printed by: The Burlington Press, Cambridge, UK. Cover illustration: Nairobi City Skyline with Kongoni and Grant's Gazelles, RIM Campbell. Available from: The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA. This publication has been prepared for Bank use.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetland Use in the Lukanga Swamps
    STAKEHOLDER INTERACTIONS IN WETLANDS: IMPLICATIONS FOR SOCIAL ECOLOGICAL SYSTEM SUSTAINABILITY A CASE OF LUKANGA SWAMPS, ZAMBIA Bags of charcoal along the Ndola- Kapiri Road: Picture courtesy of Bwalya 2007 Master of Science Thesis By RHODA NTHENA KACHALI LUND UNIVERSITY MASTERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES AND SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to sincerely thank the Swedish Institute and SIDA for awarding me a Scholarship that allowed me to pursue my Masters degree in Sweden. I would also like to thank the Staff at LUMES for their varied and vital input into my academic career at Lund. I would especially like to thank my supervisor Dr Jonas Ackerman and Dr Johanna Alkan Olsson for their valuable insights and patience. I would also like to thank Dr Victor Siamudaala and Ms Dora Kamwenshe, without them I would not have been able carry out my Field work. I would to thank my family for being there for me and Bridget Bwalya Umar for playing research assistant and allowing me to use her office space for my desk research. Last but not least, I would like to thank Gerdt and Kirsten Sonander for taking me into their home and becoming my Swedish family. 2 ACRONYMS CLD Causal Loop diagram CRB Community Resource Boards CPR Common Pool Resources DACO District Agricultural officer DAPP Develop Aid From People to People DFO District Forestry Officer ECZ Environmental Council of Zambia FSP Fertilizer Support programme GMA Game Management Area INGO International Non Governmental Organization IMWI International Water Management Institute IWRM
    [Show full text]