DOCSLIB.ORG

Maritime Carrier's Liability for Loss of Or Damage to Goods Under The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Maritime Carrier's Liability for Loss of Or Damage to Goods Under The Maritime Carrier's Liability for Loss of or Damage to Goods under the Hague Rules, Visby Rules and the Hamburg Rules, compared with his Liability as an Operator under the Relevant Rules of the International Multimodal Transport Convention. A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Hani M.S. Abdulrahim The School of Law, Faculty of Law and Financial Studies, University of Glasgow February 1994 © Hani M.S. Abdulrahim, 1994 ProQuest Number: 11007904 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 11007904 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 “ILhl m i GLASGOW C>p I UNIVERr'T library ii To My mother, brothers, sisters and in memory of my father. Acknowledgements I wish with considerable enthusiasm to acknowledge and express my deepest grateful thanks and gratitude to Dr. W. Balekjian and Mr Alan Gamble for their invaluable guidance and encouragement in supervising this thesis. They have given unsparingly of their time to it. It gives me great pleasure to acknowledge the helpfulness of the Glasgow University library staff, and also my deep gratitude to Mrs Cara Wilson who kindly typed this work. Summary The system of the carrier's liability, in respect of carriage of goods, is a very controversial issue which raises many difficulties in solving the problems thereto related, whether in national laws or in international Conventions. The present thesis, dealing with the carrier's liability, consists of five chapters and final conclusions. The first four chapters concentrate, theoretically, practically and in detail on analysing and comparing the liability regimes in relation to the carrier's liability under the Hague/Visby Rules and the Hamburg Rules, in order to ascertain which is more conducive to international certainty and uniformity. The Hague/Visby Rules and the Hamburg Rules have played a vital role in the international transport industry. They are correspondingly discussed in the thesis. Chapter five is devoted to discussion of the liability of the multimodal transport operator as one of the most important parts of the International Multimodal Transport Convention (1980). The chapter also evaluates the situation when, in the future, the Convention comes into force. In its structure the thesis is divided as follows; chapter one deals with a brief history and the scope of application of the Rules. The liability of the carrier and the limitation of the carrier's liability are considered in chapters two and three. Chapter four deals with the procedures of action for lost or damaged cargo. The liability of the multimodal transport operator for loss or damage to the goods under the 1980 United Nations Multimodal Transport of Goods Convention is dealt with in chapter five. Table of Contents Dedication ii Acknowledgements iii Summary iv Table of abbreviations x Table of cases xiii Introduction 1 Chapter One A brief history and the scope of application of the rules 5 1.1 A brief history of the Hague Rules, Visby 5 Rules and the Hamburg Rules 1.2 Scope of Application of the Rules 18 1.2.1 The documents governed by the Rules 20 1.2.1.1 Under the Hague Rules 20 1.2.1.2 Under the Hamburg Rules 28 1.2.2 The Functions of the Bill of Lading 35 A. As evidence of a contract 36 B. As a receipt for goods shipped 39 C. As a document of title to the goods. 45 1.2.3 The Voyages governed by the Rules 50 1.2.3.1 Under the Hague Rules and the Visby Rules 50 1.2.3.2 Under the Hamburg Rules 57 Concluding Remarks 60 Chapter Two The Liability of the Carrier 61 2.1 The basis of the carrier's liability and the period of responsibility 61 2.1.1 Under the Hague/Visby Rules 62 A.Exercising due diligence to make the vessel seaworthy 62 B.Loading the cargo properly and carefully 69 C.Stowing the cargo properly and carefully 76 D.Discharging the cargo properly and carefully 83 vii 2.1.2 Under the Hamburg Rules 89 2.2 The burden of proof 112 2.2.1 Under the Hague/Visby Rules 113 2.2.2 Under the Hamburg Rules 117 2.3 The immunities of the carrier 122 2.3.1 Under the Hague/Visby Rules 122 A.Error in navigation or in the management of the ship 124 B.Fire 128 C.Peril of the sea 132 2.3.2 Under the Hamburg Rules 136 Concluding Remarks 142 Chapter Three The limitation of the Carrier's liability 144 3.1 The units of limitation 145 3.1.1 Under the Hague Rules 145 A.The concept of per package 146 B.The concept of per unit 150 1."The intention of the parties" test 156 2."Functional Economic" test 159 3.1.2 Under the Visby Rules 160 3.1.3 Under the Hamburg Rules 171 3.2 The unit of account 176 3.2.1 The Gold Clause basis 177 3.2.2 The Gold Franc basis 182 3.2.3 The S.D.R. basis 185 3.3 Loss of the right to limit liability 188 3.3.1 Declaration of the nature and value of the goods 188 A.The declaration must be express 190 B.The declaration must be before shipment 192 C.The declaration must be inserted in the bill of lading 192 3.3.2 Serious Faults 194 Concluding Remarks 2 02 Chapter Four Procedures of action for lost or damaged cargo 2 05 4.1 Notice of loss, damage and delay in delivery 2 06 4.1.1 Under the Hague/Visby Rules 2 06 4.1.2 Under the Hamburg Rules 209 4.2 Time limitation for suit 213 4.2.1 Under the Hague Rules and Visby Rules 214 4.2.2 Under the Hamburg Rules 228 4.3 Jurisdiction clauses 231 4.3.1 Under the Hague/Visby Rules 2 32 4.3.2 Under the Hamburg Rules 2 39 Concluding Remarks 2 44 Chapter Five The liability of the multimodal transport operator for loss of or damage to the Goods under the 1980 United Nations Multimodal Transport of Goods Convention 2 46 5.1 The background of the Convention 246 5.2 The aim and importance of the multimodal transport of goods 256 5.3 Scope of application of the Convention and its mandatory effect 259 5.4 The liability of the MTO for loss of or damage to goods under the MT Convention 2 68 5.4.1 The system of liability under the MT Convention 2 69 5.4.2 The basis of the MTO and the period of responsibility under the MT Convention 2 73 5.4.3 The limitation of the MTO's liability under the MT Convention 2 84 5.4.3.1 The MTO's liability limit in case of non-localized or of localized loss or damage to goods 2 84 1. The MTO's liability limit in case of non­ localized loss or damage if a sea leg of transport is included in the multimodal transport 2 85 2. The MTO's liability limit in case of non­ localized loss or damage if no sea leg of transport is included in the multimodal transport 2 89 5.4.3.2 Loss of the right to limit liability 2 94 5.5 Procedures of action for lost or damaged cargo under the MT convention 2 98 5.5.1 Notice of loss, damage or delay in delivery 2 98 5.5.2 Limitation of actions 304 5.5.3 Jurisdiction clauses 310 5.6 The problems of conflict between the multimodal transport convention and the existing unimodal conventions; the solution to avoid the conflict 312 Concluding Remarks 322 Final conclusions 325 Bibliography 336 Table of conventions, reports and documents 350 X Abbreviations A. C. Law Reports, Appeal Cases. A.M.C. American Maritime Cases. Adm. Admiralty Court. All E.R. The All England Law Reports. Am.J.Comp.Law, American Journal of Comparative Law. Asp.M.L.C. Aspinall's Maritime Cases. C.A. Court of Appeal. C. J. Chief Justice. C • L • R • Commonwealth Law Reports. Can.Sup.Ct. Canadian Supreme Court. Ch. Law Reports, Chancery. Ch.D. Chancery Division. C.M.I. Comity Maritime International. COGSA. Carriage of Goods by Sea Act. Com.Cas. Reports of Commercial Cases. Ct. Court. Ct. J. Circuit Judge. Ct. of App. U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. D. J. District Judge. Dist.Ct. U.S. District Court. Div. Ct. Divisional Court. E.C.E Economic Commission for Europe. E.C.O.S.O.C. Economic and Social Council. E ■ L. D • European Law Digest. E.T.L. European Transport Law. Ex.C.R. Exchequer Court Reports. F. 2d. Federal Reporter, Second Series. F.C. Federal Court Reports (Canada). F.Supp. Federal Supplement (USA) 1932. Fed.Rep. Federal Reporter (USA) 1880. H.L. The House of Lords. H.L.R. Harvard Law Review. I.C.A.O.......... ......... International Civil Aviation Organization. I.C.C...........
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bills of Lading 4 - Cargo Shortage Claims
    Claims Guides Bills of Lading 4 - Cargo Shortage Claims The carrier is under an obligation to deliver the full cargo which was loaded. Invariably cargo shortage claims arise from time to time. How are these claims treated under English law? “Figures” is a term used throughout this document to describe the “number packages or pieces, or the quantity, or weight”, of the goods carried. What is the evidence against a) What is the evidential weight of the “weight, measure, quantity, quality, the owners? bill of lading figures towards third condition, contents and value party receivers: conclusive evidence unknown”: Weighing the evidence When shortage claims arise at the or prima facie evidence? discharge port, whether or not the carrier Once it is established that the figures is liable is a question of evidence. Under the Hague Visby Rules, Article are not binding on the carrier, an III Rule 4, the figures on the bill of English court will just weigh evidence lading will be conclusive evidence from both parties as in a normal between the carrier and the third dispute. A useful guide to see how party. (See also the Hamburg Rules, an English court would consider a Article 16(3)(b)). shortage case is illustrated in the MONTANA LLR 402 [1990]. In this b) Can the owners protect themselves case, the judge looked at the evidence with disclaimers such as: “weight, as to how accurate the tally would measure, quantity, quality, have been: no tally man on every hold, condition, contents and sometimes a tally man had to count value unknown?” slings from two holds, some of the English law recognises the disclaimer discharge occurred at night time, the “weight, measure, quantity, quality, stevedores were paid per tonnage condition, contents and value discharged and not time, there was an unknown”.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Win at Marine Cargo Claims: an English Perspective the Hague, Hague-Bisby and Hamburg Rules
    HOW TO WIN AT MARINE CARGO CLAIMS: AN ENGLISH PERSPECTIVE THE HAGUE, HAGUE-BISBY AND HAMBURG RULES Simon David Jones, English Solicitor Cozen O’Connor Tower 42, Level 27 25 Old Broad Street London, UK +44 (0) 20 7864 2000 [email protected] Atlanta Charlotte Cherry Hill Chicago Dallas Las Vegas* Los Angeles New York Newark Philadelphia San Diego San Francisco Seattle West Conshohocken Washington, DC Wilmington *Affiliated with the Law Offices of J. Goldberg & D. Grossman The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of any current or former client of Cozen O'Connor. These materials are not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should not act or rely on this material without seeking specific legal advice on matters which concern them. Copyright (c) 2001 Cozen O'Connor ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 1 HOW TO WIN AT MARINE CARGO CLAIMS : AN ENGLISH PERSPECTIVE THE HAGUE, HAGUE-VISBY AND HAMBURG RULES Background At English common law the parties to a contract of affreightment covered by a Bill of Lading or similar document had complete freedom to negotiate their own terms as had the parties to a charterparty. Abuse of the carriers’ stronger bargaining position during the 19th century led to extremely onerous terms being placed in Bills of Lading. The first attempt to redress the balance between the interests of ship and cargo came from the United States in the form of the Harter Act of 1893. It soon became clear to the major marine trading countries that a single Convention binding all contracting parties was preferable to a system of similar but not identical Acts.
    [Show full text]
  • TO EXHIBITS (Continued) ^Y EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION IDENTIFIED ADMITTED C-6 Memo Dated 1/12/72 to 123 185 D
    3 HINDEX TO EXHIBITS (Continued) ^y EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION IDENTIFIED ADMITTED C-6 Memo dated 1/12/72 to 123 185 D. J. Platt from J. N. Stein with attached Pollution Control Equipment Survey C-13 Five DER Bureau of Labor- 49 atories Special Analyses Reports C-25 Four-page "Safe Practice . 129 186 Data Sheet" for trichloroethylene C-34 Memo dated 1/3/84 to 132 ' 188 R. C. Williams from T. M. Kohn regarding hazardous waste information with 'attached documents C-59 Purchase Orders for 131 186^; trichloroethylene ^i C-121(a) Map of Westinghouse plant 22 72 site showing plant storm j drain and sanitary sewer systems C-121(b) Map of Plant Operations 80 184 Layout i || C-121(c) Map of Location of Potential 91 184 Source Areas ' FOR - WESTINGHOUSE D-l Report of Industrial Waste 165 189 Survey dated 7/24/73 and Repor••* • t- of^ Industria^ * • l« • Proces«* s Emissions Inventory (Stack Sampling) dated 10/9/73 . prepared by Buchart-Horn CAPITAL CITY REPORTING SERVICE BOX 11908 FEDERAL SQUARE STATION BR305S79 HARRISBURG, PA 17108 TELEPHONE (717) 533-2195 1 ^2 JUDGE FITZPATRICK: This is a civil 3 penalty complaint proceeding initiated on August 16, 4 1988, by the Department of Environmental Resources 5 against Westinghouse Electric Corporation. This 6 proceeding is docketed at EHB Docket No. 88-319-CP-F. | 7 In its complaint, DER seeks imposition 8 of a $9,081,336 civil penalty on Westinghouse for 9 alleged violations of the Clean Streams Law at 10 Westinghouse's elevator manufacturing plant in 11 Cumberland Township, Adams County.
    [Show full text]
  • 81288967.6.Pdf
    *v tmtmmmmmmmmm /'(^,:'.' •' ; i V I I IJailtj/l ]>oKMS OFl)SSIA>'. ' ^ TO TllE EDITOR OF THB NOllTH BBITI3H DAILT UAU.. Sir - In your iritùfuc on the traiislation o£ the poeuis of Ossian, in yesterJay's issue, I tìnd that both thu traniilatur and writer of the article have fallen into a vei-y curious mistake iu their transla- lation of the only Gaelic iiuotation thereiu, liaving remUred thcword "ahviil" intosails, in placeofeye in its proper signiiication, the word for sails being this connection "shiuil." The ciuotation will then read translated, keeping for the rest to the ' writt'r'tì text— •• Tliim eji', I) m.v frieii.l: is l.. iiie | Like lu-ifililtìDÌiii; ol' morn ..ut of c!..iiil. , wbiih, I think, is a inore apposite tìgure than tbe I other.—I am, &e., <Jae[.. I Ardrishaig, ".th J,inu.%ry. " [Tlie word in the original is " shiuil." ShuU" ia simijly a typographical error. The whole passage •willbefound in the " Fingal," Duan II.,bBtweon verse :!41 aml o.'il. It is the cxclamation of CuchuUin as he sees the war ships of Fiugal bearing down to. Iii8 aid on the Irish coast. If the werd ha.l be?n •' shuil" the remark ot our correspcjndent would be • iiuite accurate.—Ed. N.B.D.M.] : siiouiKj Bq'j ^vin a]qBqo.ia Bi qi sonapiAa uoa£) •(, Aiuo eq:) si gg^x 3« oiISE;) pa^uijd eqx 'paiisu •jnud ui iioi;'EM[qtid JI3IH mi\i aopjo i[onn] ein suuoj BBq ^diJOBUUEM •(Bqj joj 'iioa pa)utjdaa '[ ;u9eajd Jiaq; u; s~,xi\ OH-'^O ^'l^ ^'^'I^ E9Aoad peaa)iB si qoiqii '.i08T "! :)d!aosnuBra s,u"oEjaqdo- eouapiAa jo dtrjjB ouo ^ou puE 'oipEf) «[U0Bna9A
    [Show full text]
  • Rise of the Machines – a Legal Analysis of Seaworthiness in the Context of Autonomous Shipping
    FACULTY OF LAW Lund University Anders Kirchner Rise of the Machines – A Legal analysis of Seaworthiness in the context of autonomous shipping JURM02 Graduate Thesis Graduate Thesis, Master of Laws program 30 higher education credits Supervisor: Olena Bokareva Semester of graduation: Period 1 Spring Semester 2019 Contents SUMMARY 1 SAMMANFATTNING 3 PREFACE 6 ABBREVIATIONS 7 1 INTRODUCTION 9 1.1 History and background 9 1.2 Purpose and problem 11 1.3 Delimitations 12 1.4 Method, material and state of research 12 1.5 Outline 14 2 AUTONOMOUS SHIPS: EVOLUTION AND SELECTED PROJECTS 15 2.1 Introduction 15 2.2 Autonomous vessel projects 16 2.2.1 Svitzer Hermod 16 2.2.2 YARA Birkeland 16 2.2.3 Falco 17 2.2.4 ReVolt 17 2.2.5 MUNIN 18 2.2.6 Mitsui and Nippon Yusen project 18 2.2.7 Shone 19 2.2.8 Waterborne TP 19 2.3 Factors impacting autonomous vessels 20 2.3.1 Economy 20 2.3.2 Safety 23 2.3.3 Environment 25 2.4 Concluding remarks 27 3 THE CONCEPT OF AUTONOMOUS SHIPS: TERMINOLOGY AND LEGAL CONCEPT 29 3.1 Introduction 29 3.2 Definition of an autonomous ship 30 3.2.1 Waterborne project 30 3.2.2 MUNIN 30 3.2.3 NFAS 30 3.2.4 Lloyd’s Registers definitions of autonomy levels of vessels 31 3.2.5 IMO definitions of autonomy levels of ships 32 3.3 Shore control centre 32 3.4 Is an unmanned ship a ship? 33 3.4.1 UNCLOS 34 3.4.1.1 Background 34 3.4.1.2 Definition of a ship 34 3.4.2 MARPOL 73/78 35 3.4.2.1 Background 35 3.4.2.2 Definition of a ship 36 3.4.3 SOLAS and ISM Code 36 3.4.3.1 Background 36 3.4.3.2 Definition of a ship 37 3.4.4 COLREGs 37 3.4.4.1
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of Florida
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DAVID SNELGROVE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) vs. ) CASE NO. SC02-2242 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) _________________________ ) APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR FLAGLER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDED INITIAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT JAMES B. GIBSON PUBLIC DEFENDER SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT JAMES R. WULCHAK CHIEF, APPELLATE DIVISION ASSISTANT PUBLIC DEFENDER Florida Bar No. 249238 LARRY B. HENDERSON ASSISTANT PUBLIC DEFENDER Florida Bar No. 0353973 112 Orange Avenue, Suite A Daytona Beach, Florida 32114 (386) 252-3367 ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. TABLE OF CONTENTS i-iii TABLE OF CITATIONS iv-xv PREFACE xx STATEMENT OF THE CASE 1 STATEMENT OF THE FACTS 16 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT 33 ARGUMENT POINT I 35 THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN DENYING COUNSEL’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW BASED ON CONFLICT OF INTERESTS, DEPRIVING THE DEFENDANT OF HIS FLORIDA AND FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO COUNSEL, DUE PROCESS, EQUAL PROTECTION, AND A FAIR TRIAL. POINT II 41 THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN FAILING TO CONDUCT A RICHARDSON INQUIRY WHERE THE STATE FAILED TO DISCLOSE TO THE DEFENSE A LETTER WRITTEN BY A STATE’S WITNESS AND WHERE THE STATE ALLOWED FALSE TESTIMONY TO BE PRESENTED BY ITS WITNESS. i POINT III 51 THE PROSECUTOR’S IMPROPER AND INFLAMMATORY REMARKS TAINTED THE JURY TRIAL AND RENDERED THE ENTIRE PROCEEDING FUNDAMENTALLY UNFAIR. POINT IV 57 THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN DENYING THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR A RECESS IN THE PENALTY PHASE PRIOR TO CLOSING ARGUMENTS, DEPRIVING SNELGROVE OF HIS RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL AND TO THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL, UNDER THE FEDERAL AND FLORIDA CONSTITUTIONS.
    [Show full text]
  • Pleasure Boating and Admiralty: Erie at Sea' Preble Stolz*
    California Law Review VoL. 51 OCTOBER 1963 No. 4 Pleasure Boating and Admiralty: Erie at Sea' Preble Stolz* P LEASURE BOATING is basically a new phenomenon, the product of a technology that can produce small boats at modest cost and of an economy that puts such craft within the means of almost everyone.' The risks generated by this development create new legal problems. New legal problems are typically solved first, and often finally, by extension of com- mon law doctrines in the state courts. Legislative regulation and any solu- tion at the federal level are exceptional and usually come into play only as a later stage of public response.2 There is no obvious reason why our legal system should react differ- ently to the new problems presented by pleasure boating. Small boats fall easily into the class of personal property. The normal rules of sales and security interests would seem capable of extension to small boats without difficulty. The same should be true of the rules relating to the operation of pleasure boats and particularly to the liability for breach of the duty to take reasonable care for the safety of others. One would expect, therefore, that the legal problems of pleasure boating would be met with the typical response: adaptation of the common law at the state level. Unhappily this is not likely to happen. Pleasure boating has the mis- fortune of presenting basic issues in an already complex problem of fed- t I am grateful to Professor Geoffrey C. Hazard, Jr. for reading the manuscript in nearly final form, and to Professor Ronan E.
    [Show full text]
  • Seaworthiness in the Context of Marine Insurance and General Average
    _____________________ 海 運 學 會 Institute of Seatransport Seminar on Seaworthiness In the context of Marine Insurance and General Average Speakers: Capt. L C Chan – Risk Management & Loss Prevention Consultant of CM Houlder Insurance Brokers Ltd. Mr. Raymond T C Wong – Emeritus Chairman of Institute of Seatransport Date : 27th July 2016 AGENDA • Seaworthiness – Definition – Maritime Law concept – Governed by Ship Certificates – Description • What does it mean for a vessel to be “unseaworthy”? – With some cases for reference • ISM Code • Marine Insurance Implications – Warranties – Voyage & Time policies – Cargo Policies - Seaworthiness Admitted – Hull Policies – Wear & Tear, Latent Defect, Due Diligence and ISM Warranty – Burden of Proof • General Average – Cargo’s Refusal to Contribute – GA and Contract of Carriage – Consequences flow from Rule D of the York-Antwerp Rules – Burden of Proof 2 – Exercising due diligence to provide a seaworthy ship Capt LC Chan – Profile Sea Experience 1. 10 years as Deck Officers in bulkers, tankers & container vessels 2. 15 years as Master in bulker and container vessels In CM Houlder - Risk Management & Loss Prevention Consultant Before CM Houlder • Management team in a container liner – accident investigation, cargo operations, vessel claims matters, recruitment of senior officers, crew training & instructor in company simulator centre • Corporate Safety, Security & Environmental Protection Officer to set policy, implement and supervise • Corporate Emergency Response Team manager to handle ship and land
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Reading Dreams: an Audience-Critical Approach to the Dreams in the Gospel of Matthew Derek S. Dodson, B.A., M.Div
    ABSTRACT Reading Dreams: An Audience-Critical Approach to the Dreams in the Gospel of Matthew Derek S. Dodson, B.A., M.Div. Mentor: Charles H. Talbert, Ph.D. This dissertation seeks to read the dreams in the Gospel of Matthew (1:18b-25; 2:12, 13-15, 19-21, 22; 27:19) as the authorial audience. This approach requires an understanding of the social and literary character of dreams in the Greco-Roman world. Chapter Two describes the social function of dreams, noting that dreams constituted one form of divination in the ancient world. This religious character of dreams is further described by considering the practice of dreams in ancient magic and Greco-Roman cults as well as the role of dream interpreters. This chapter also includes a sketch of the theories and classification of dreams that developed in the ancient world. Chapters Three and Four demonstrate the literary dimensions of dreams in Greco-Roman literature. I refer to this literary character of dreams as the “script of dreams;” that is, there is a “script” (form) to how one narrates or reports dreams in ancient literature, and at the same time dreams could be adapted, or “scripted,” for a range of literary functions. This exploration of the literary representation of dreams is nuanced by considering the literary form of dreams, dreams in the Greco-Roman rhetorical tradition, the inventiveness of literary dreams, and the literary function of dreams. In light of the social and literary contexts of dreams, the dreams of the Gospel of Matthew are analyzed in Chapter Five.
    [Show full text]
  • Carriage Contracts, Liabilities and Cargo Claims
    MASTERCLASS WORKSHOP CARRIAGE CONTRACTS, LIABILITIES AND CARGO CLAIMS Dubai 10-12 December 2019 MASTERCLASS WORKSHOP CARRIAGE CONTRACTS, LIABILITIES AND CARGO CLAIMS Day 1 Day 2 08:30-09:00 Registration / coffee 08:30-09:00 Informal Q&A 09:00-09:20 Course introduction 09:00-10:30 The carriers’ defences: ● exclusions from liability 09:20-10:15 Overview of marine cargo claims ● in what circumstances can the carrier rely on The inter/relationship between: them? ● the cargo sale contract and ● limitation of liability ● the carriage contracts and ● time limits. ● the insurance contract. 10:30-11:00 Coffee 10:15-11:00 Who is the carrier? ● the importance of the question 11:00-12:00 Cargo claims under multimodal carriage ● how is the question answered? contracts ● the position under chartered ships. 12:00-12:30 What is the governing contract of carriage 11:00-11:30 Coffee when the vessel is chartered and bills of lading are issued? 11:30-12:15 Who has the right to sue the carrier? ● the effect of the transfer of the bill of lading 12:30-13:30 Lunch from seller to buyer ● the effect of insurance. 13:30-15:00 Jurisdiction and security requirements: ● court or arbitration 12:15-13:00 Contractual and non-contractual claims: ● arrest procedures ● claims under the contract of carriage ● threshold jurisdiction ● claims in tort/delict outside the contract of ● stay of proceedings. carriage ● the effect on contractual defences. 15:00-15:30 Coffee 13:00-14:00 Lunch 15:30-17:30 Case study 1 14:00-15:00 Introduction to the international conventions for the carriage of cargo by sea: ● Hague Rules ● Hague-Visby Rules ● Hamburg Rules ● Rotterdam Rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Samuel Taylor Coleridge
    TESIS DOCTORAL 2015 LA INFLUENCIA DE LA LITERATURA FANTÁSTICA DECIMONÓNICA EN LENGUA INGLESA EN EL ROCK’N’ROLL: Estudio y análisis de algunas “literary covers” sobre siete autores del siglo XIX POR JESÚS MARÍA MARTÍNEZ NAVAJAS LICENCIADO EN FILOLOGÍA INGLESA UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE EDUCACIÓN A DISTANCIA FACULTAD DE FILOLOGÍA – MADRID Departamento de Filologías Extranjeras y sus Lingüísticas Director de la Tesis: Dr. D. Antonio BALLESTEROS GONZÁLEZ 1 - DEPARTAMENTO DE FILOLOGÍAS EXTRANJERAS Y SUS LINGÜISTICAS, FACULTAD DE FILOLOGÍA. - TÍTULO DE LA TESIS: LA INFLUENCIA DE LA LITERATURA FANTÁSTICA DECIMONÓNICA EN LENGUA INGLESA EN EL ROCK’N’ROLL: ESTUDIO Y ANÁLISIS DE ALGUNAS “LITERARY COVERS” SOBRE SIETE AUTORES DEL SIGLO XIX. - AUTOR: JESÚS MARÍA MARTÍNEZ NAVAJAS (LICENCIADO EN FILOLOGÍA INGLESA). - DIRECTOR DE TESIS: DR. D. ANTONIO BALLESTEROS GONZÁLEZ. 2 AGRADECIMIENTOS Este trabajo está dedicado muy especialmente a mis padres Teresa y Jesús, sin cuyo apoyo y respaldo no habría sido posible esta investigación, por darme todo el amor y una educación de libre pensamiento y ser el faro que guía mi desarrollo intelectual y mi existencia. AsImismo, a mis hermanos Pablo, Andrés y Paloma, y a mi compañera Giuliana por su inagotable paciencia y cariño. Gracias, familia. Vaya un agradecimiento muy especial para la Dra. Dª María del Carmen González Landa por la gran ayuda y todo lo que me ha transmitido. También quiero agradecer a Iñaki Osés y la Eguzki Irratia de Pamplona por haberme brindado la oportunidad de difundir mis conocimientos literarios y musicales a través de las ondas radiofónicas. Como no podía ser de otra manera deseo expresar mi agradecimiento al Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of International Unification of Transport Law
    The Future of International Unification of Transport Law Jan Ramberg Already in 1973 I saw fit to express some thoughts as to the prospects of harmonizing the rules relating to the various modes of transport.1 In particular it could be noted that maritime law differed considerably from the law of the other modes. The carrier of goods by sea enjoyed particular exemptions (such as the exemption for error in navigation and the management of the vessel and of fire) and further much lower monetary limits of liability than applied to the other modes. At that time, efforts to create a new régime had already been initiated under the auspices of UNCITRAL and this resulted in the so-called Hamburg Rules 19782 and somewhat later the 1980 UN Convention on Multimodal Transport of Goods. The Hamburg Rules have entered into force but on a limited scale and the multimodal transport convention has not entered into force and will presumably remain unsuccessful in its present form. Within the law of freight forwarding the 1967 UNIDROIT Draft Convention met opposition by the freight forwarders' world organization, FIATA, and did not advance to a diplomatic conference. Efforts within FIATA were undertaken to create general conditions for worldwide acceptance. This resulted in the 1997 FIATA Model Rules for Freight Forwarding Services which, it seems, only serves as a model in order to indicate the desirable level of liability to be used in national freight forwarding conditions. In particular, it should be noted that the freight forwarder is liable as carrier when he actually performs the carriage or when “he has made an express or implied undertaking to assume carrier liability” (Art.
    [Show full text]