DOCSLIB.ORG

Visibility Analysis of Domestic Satellites on Proposed Ground Sites for Optical Surveillance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Visibility Analysis of Domestic Satellites on Proposed Ground Sites for Optical Surveillance Technical Paper J. Astron. Space Sci. 28(4), 319-332 (2011) http://dx.doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2011.28.4.319 Visibility Analysis of Domestic Satellites on Proposed Ground Sites for Optical Surveillance Jae-Hyuk Kim1,2†, Jung Hyun Jo1, Jin Choi1, Hong-Kyu Moon1, Young-Jun Choi1, Hong-Suh Yim1, Jang-Hyun Park1, Eun-Seo Park1, and Jong-Uk Park1 1Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, Daejeon 305-348, Korea 2Department of Astronomy, Yonsei University, Seoul 120-749, Korea The objectives of this study are to analyze the satellite visibility at the randomly established ground sites, to determine the five optimal ground sites to perform the optical surveillance and tracking of domestic satellites, and to verify the ac- quisition of the optical observation time sufficient to maintain the precise ephemeris at optimal ground sites that have been already determined. In order to accomplish these objectives, we analyzed the visibility for sun-synchronous orbit satellites, low earth orbit satellites, middle earth orbit satellites and domestic satellites as well as the continuous visibility along with the fictitious satellite ground track, and calculate the effective visibility. For the analysis, we carried out a series of repetitive process using the satellite tool kit simulation software developed by Analytical Graphics Incorporated. The lighting states of the penumbra and direct sun were set as the key constraints of the optical observation. The minimum of the observation satellite elevation angle was set to be 20 degree, whereas the maximum of the sun elevation angle was set to be -10 degree which is within the range of the nautical twilight. To select the candidates for the optimal optical ob- servation, the entire globe was divided into 84 sectors in a constant interval, the visibility characteristics of the individual sectors were analyzed, and 17 ground sites were arbitrarily selected and analyzed further. Finally, five optimal ground sites (Khurel Togoot Observatory, Assy-Turgen Observatory, Tubitak National Observatory, Bisdee Tier Optical Astronomy Observatory, and South Africa Astronomical Observatory) were determined. The total observation period was decided as one year. To examine the seasonal variation, the simulation was performed for the period of three days or less with respect to spring, summer, fall and winter. In conclusion, we decided the optimal ground sites to perform the optical sur- veillance and tracking of domestic satellites and verified that optical observation time sufficient to maintain the precise ephemeris could be acquired at the determined observatories. Keywords: optical surveillance, visibility analysis, dawn-dusk orbit, sun-synchronous orbit, ground track analysis, do- mestic satellites 1. INTRODUCTION orbit tracking are superior to the orbit measurement by means of optical observation in terms of precision and The attempt to determine satellite orbit and maintain accuracy. Among these orbit observation methods, SLR the ephemeris through optical observation has been and GPS orbit tracking require the installation of a laser continuously made since Sputnik I was launched in retro-reflector array (LRRA) or a GPS receiver (Pearlman 1957 (King-Hele 1983). The methods that are generally et al. 2002). The orbit of the objects with which mutual used for orbit observation such as satellite laser ranging communication is impossible, such as space debris or (SLR), radar tracking and global positioning system (GPS) discarded satellites, cannot be determined by these two This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Received Aug 03, 2011 Revised Aug 25, 2011 Accepted Aug 31, 2011 Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://cre- †Corresponding Author ativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, E-mail: [email protected] provided the original work is properly cited. Tel: +82-42-865-2185 Fax: +82-42-861-5610 Copyright © The Korean Space Science Society 319 http://janss.kr pISSN: 2093-5587 eISSN: 2093-1409 J. Astron. Space Sci. 28(4), 319-332 (2011) methods. However, the orbit determination by optical ary and December, 2010. The subject satellite was Korea observation is not dependent on the transmission and multi-purpose satellite-2 (KOMPSAT-2). Table 1 summa- reception of specific observation data. Refer to Kim et al. rizes the specification of KOMPSAT-2. The orbit propa- (1987) for detailed information on optical observation. If gator used for the simulation was the simplified general only the observable optical visibility and sufficient obser- perturbations propagator (SGP4)1 that receives the two- vation time are allowed, the satellite ephemeris can be line elements (TLE) provided by Analytical Graphics In- maintained or improved by estimating the observation corporated (AGI) as the input orbital elements to predict position on the celestial sphere in advance on the basis the orbit. of the orbital elements of a given satellite. The important KOMPSAT-2, a domestic sun-synchronous orbit (SSO) factors for this process are the effective range and possible satellite, was observationally visible only in the high lati- frequency of the optical observation with reference to the tude region (north latitude 34 degrees or higher or south ground. To explain the efficiency of optical observation latitude 30 degrees or higher) as shown in Fig. 2. For about to maintain satellite ephemeris, the optimal ground sites 300 astronomical observatories including ground-based with the higher visibility should be determined first, and astronomical facilities and overseas observatories in the the effective visibility (EV) of each observatory should be analyzed (Jo 2011). Table 1. KOMPSAT-2 satellite and orbit specification.* Satellite information Launch date 20060728 2. VISIBILITY ANALYSIS OF SUN-SYNCHRONOUS Projectile Rokot rocket ORBIT SATELLITES ON SECTORIZED FICTITOUS Launch site Plesetsk, Russia Mass 800 kg GROUND SITES Diameter 200 cm Height 280 cm Basically, for all the simulation process, the maximum Orbital elements of the sun elevation angle was set to be -10 degree which Perigee 656.2999877929688 km is within the range of the nautical twilight. The lighting Apogee 680.9000244140625 km Orbital period 98.5999984741211 min states of the penumbra and direct sun were set as the Inclination 98.0999984741211 deg key constraints. The minimum of the observation satel- Eccentricity 0.0017455226043239236 lite elevation angle was set to be 20 degree, which is the Orbit SSO KOMPSAT-2: Korea multi-purpose satellite-2, SSO: sun-synchronous orbit. consideration of the light pollution and local sites. To an- * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arirang-2 [cited 2011 Feb 4] alyze the visibility, 84 fictitious ground sites were set in a 30° interval for the earth’s latitude and longitude (Fig. 1). 1http://www.stk.com/resources/help/online/stk/source/stk/vehsat_orbitprop_ The entire simulation period was one year between Janu- choose.htm [cited 2011 Feb 2] Fig. 1. Eighty-four sectorized fictitious ground sites are positioned every 30 deg (30° × 30°), and the text color means same latitude mark, the ground track displayed in the figure is by Korea multi-purpose satellite-2 (KOMPSAT-2). http://dx.doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2011.28.4.319 320 Jae-Hyuk Kim et al. Visibility Analysis for Optical Surveillance list of astronomical observatories2, we checked out the tration-18 (NOAA-18) satellite (Fig. 4) had the widest visi- weather conditions, number of clearly sky days, and pro- bility range which was north latitude 25 degrees or higher vision of the communication and technological support. or south latitude 30 degrees or higher. Excluding the candidate observatories in the countries that are difficult to approach because of international po- litical reasons, 17 candidate observatories were set as in 3. VISIBILITY ANALYSIS OF LOW EARTH ORBIT Table 2. The visibility for the SSO satellites that are gener- AND MIDDLE EARTH ORBIT SATELLITES ON ally known at the determined observatories was verified PROPOSED 17 GROUND SITES as shown in Table 3. The GeoEye satellite (Fig. 3) had the most narrow visibility range which was north latitude 35 Before analyzing the visibility of the low earth orbit degrees or higher or south latitude 40 degrees or higher, (LEO) satellites and middle earth orbit (MEO) satellites, whereas the national oceanic and atmospheric adminis- we verified if it was possible to categorize currently op- erating satellites according to orbital elements, and if the 2http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_astronomical_observatories [cited 2011 Feb 7] categorized groups had the visibility characteristics. Fig. 2. Visibility of KOMPSAT-2 on 84 sectorized fictitious ground sites is drawn in topocentric horizon, and the results of same latitude are represented same colors (Kim 2011a). Table 2. Characteristics of proposed 17 ground sites (Moon 2011). Proposed ground sites Latitude (deg) Longitude (deg) Elevation (m) Main telescope Khurel Togoot Observatory 47.865 107.0536111 1,620 0.4 m Indian Astronomical Observatory 32.77944444 78.96416667 4,500 2 m Assy-Turgen Observatory 43.22444444 77.87138889 2,665 1 m RC Tien-Shan Observatory 43.95 76.95 2,800 1 m RC Pamir High-Mountain Observatory 38 74 4,350 0.7 m RC Sanglokh Observatory 38.2 69 2,300 1 m RC Mount Dushak-Erekdag Observatory 37.95583333 57.90583333 2,020 1 m Wide-field Maidanak Observatory 38.6725 66.90083333 2,000 1.5 m Roque de Los Muchachos Observatory 28.76666667 -17.88333333
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Survey and Assessment of the Capabilities of Cubesats for Earth Observation
    Acta Astronautica 74 (2012) 50–68 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Acta Astronautica journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/actaastro Review A survey and assessment of the capabilities of Cubesats for Earth observation Daniel Selva a,n, David Krejci b a Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA b Vienna University of Technology, Vienna 1040, Austria article info abstract Article history: In less than a decade, Cubesats have evolved from purely educational tools to a standard Received 2 December 2011 platform for technology demonstration and scientific instrumentation. The use of COTS Accepted 9 December 2011 (Commercial-Off-The-Shelf) components and the ongoing miniaturization of several technologies have already led to scattered instances of missions with promising Keywords: scientific value. Furthermore, advantages in terms of development cost and develop- Cubesats ment time with respect to larger satellites, as well as the possibility of launching several Earth observation satellites dozens of Cubesats with a single rocket launch, have brought forth the potential for University satellites radically new mission architectures consisting of very large constellations or clusters of Systems engineering Cubesats. These architectures promise to combine the temporal resolution of GEO Remote sensing missions with the spatial resolution of LEO missions, thus breaking a traditional trade- Nanosatellites Picosatellites off in Earth observation mission design. This paper assesses the current capabilities of Cubesats with respect to potential employment in Earth observation missions. A thorough review of Cubesat bus technology capabilities is performed, identifying potential limitations and their implications on 17 different Earth observation payload technologies. These results are matched to an exhaustive review of scientific require- ments in the field of Earth observation, assessing the possibilities of Cubesats to cope with the requirements set for each one of 21 measurement categories.
    [Show full text]
  • L AUNCH SYSTEMS Databk7 Collected.Book Page 18 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM Databk7 Collected.Book Page 19 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM
    databk7_collected.book Page 17 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM CHAPTER TWO L AUNCH SYSTEMS databk7_collected.book Page 18 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM databk7_collected.book Page 19 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM CHAPTER TWO L AUNCH SYSTEMS Introduction Launch systems provide access to space, necessary for the majority of NASA’s activities. During the decade from 1989–1998, NASA used two types of launch systems, one consisting of several families of expendable launch vehicles (ELV) and the second consisting of the world’s only partially reusable launch system—the Space Shuttle. A significant challenge NASA faced during the decade was the development of technologies needed to design and implement a new reusable launch system that would prove less expensive than the Shuttle. Although some attempts seemed promising, none succeeded. This chapter addresses most subjects relating to access to space and space transportation. It discusses and describes ELVs, the Space Shuttle in its launch vehicle function, and NASA’s attempts to develop new launch systems. Tables relating to each launch vehicle’s characteristics are included. The other functions of the Space Shuttle—as a scientific laboratory, staging area for repair missions, and a prime element of the Space Station program—are discussed in the next chapter, Human Spaceflight. This chapter also provides a brief review of launch systems in the past decade, an overview of policy relating to launch systems, a summary of the management of NASA’s launch systems programs, and tables of funding data. The Last Decade Reviewed (1979–1988) From 1979 through 1988, NASA used families of ELVs that had seen service during the previous decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights in Space 2010
    International Astronautical Federation Committee on Space Research International Institute of Space Law 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren c/o CNES 94 bis, Avenue de Suffren UNITED NATIONS 75015 Paris, France 2 place Maurice Quentin 75015 Paris, France Tel: +33 1 45 67 42 60 Fax: +33 1 42 73 21 20 Tel. + 33 1 44 76 75 10 E-mail: : [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Fax. + 33 1 44 76 74 37 URL: www.iislweb.com OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS URL: www.iafastro.com E-mail: [email protected] URL : http://cosparhq.cnes.fr Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law The United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs is responsible for promoting international cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space and assisting developing countries in using space science and technology. United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs P. O. Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: (+43-1) 26060-4950 Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5830 E-mail: [email protected] URL: www.unoosa.org United Nations publication Printed in Austria USD 15 Sales No. E.11.I.3 ISBN 978-92-1-101236-1 ST/SPACE/57 *1180239* V.11-80239—January 2011—775 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR OUTER SPACE AFFAIRS UNITED NATIONS OFFICE AT VIENNA Highlights in Space 2010 Prepared in cooperation with the International Astronautical Federation, the Committee on Space Research and the International Institute of Space Law Progress in space science, technology and applications, international cooperation and space law UNITED NATIONS New York, 2011 UniTEd NationS PUblication Sales no.
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Intelligence for Small Satellites Mission Autonomy.Pdf
    POLITECNICO DI TORINO Repository ISTITUZIONALE Artificial Intelligence for Small Satellites Mission Autonomy Original Artificial Intelligence for Small Satellites Mission Autonomy / Feruglio, Lorenzo. - (2017 Dec 11). Availability: This version is available at: 11583/2694565 since: 2017-12-12T12:02:11Z Publisher: Politecnico di Torino Published DOI:10.6092/polito/porto/2694565 Terms of use: Altro tipo di accesso This article is made available under terms and conditions as specified in the corresponding bibliographic description in the repository Publisher copyright (Article begins on next page) 11 October 2021 Doctoral Dissertation Doctoral Program in Aerospace Engineering (29 th Cycle) Artificial Intelligence for Small Satellites Mission Autonomy By Lorenzo Feruglio ****** Supervisor: Prof. S. Corpino Doctoral Examination Committee: Prof. Franco Bernelli Zazzera, Referee, Politecnico di Milano Prof. Michèle Roberta Jans Lavagna, Referee, Politecnico di Milano Prof. Giancarmine Fasano, Referee, Università di Napoli Federico II Prof. Paolo Maggiore, Referee, Politecnico di Torino Prof. Nicole Viola, Referee, Politecnico di Torino Politecnico di Torino 2017 Declaration I hereby declare that, the contents and organization of this dissertation constitute my own original work and does not compromise in any way the rights of third parties, including those relating to the security of personal data. Lorenzo Feruglio 2017 * This dissertation is presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for Ph.D. degree in the Graduate School of Politecnico di Torino (ScuDo). A mia mamma, mio papà, mio fratello. Grazie per esserci sempre stati, per essere stati delle guide incredibili. Grazie Acknowledgment I would like to acknowledge and thank a great number of people: not everyone can be included here, but I’m sure the people I would like to thank already know I’m grateful to them.
    [Show full text]
  • KOREASAT 6 Ku-Band Commercial Communications Satellite
    KOREASAT 6 Ku-band Commercial Communications Satellite GEO Communications FACTS AT A GLANCE Mission Description Coverage: Orbital ATK teamed with Thales Alenia Space of France to supply the KOREASAT 6 commercial Korea communications satellite for KT Corporation of the Republic of Korea. Orbital ATK provided its GEOStar-2™ satellite platform; carried out engineering, manufacturing, integration and final spacecraft testing at its satellite manufacturing facility located in Dulles, Virginia; and performed launch site operations in Kourou, French Guiana. Thales Alenia Space was prime contractor for the project and provided the communications payload. In addition, the team delivered a ground system to support on- orbit operations of the satellite. Orbital ATK provided six months of on-site support after the satellite was handed over to the customer. KOREASAT 6 carries 24 Ku-band channels to provide Fixed Satellite Services (FSS) and six channels for Direct Broadcast Services (DBS) to the people of Korea. The spacecraft generates 3.4 kilowatts of Mission: payload power and has a 15-year on-orbit mission life. KOREASAT 6 was launched in December 2010 Ku-band communications to provide to a final orbital slot at 116 degrees East Longitude. Direct Broadcast Services (DBS) and Fixed Satellite Services (FSS) The GEOStar™ Advantage Customer: Orbital ATK’s highly successful Geosynchronous Earth Orbit (GEO) communications satellites are based KT Corporation on the company’s GEOStar spacecraft platform, which is able to accommodate all types of commercial (Thales Alenia Space – Prime communications payloads and is compatible with all major commercial launchers. The company’s Contractor) GEOStar product line includes the GEOStar-2 design, which is optimized for smaller satellite missions that can support up to 5.0 kilowatts of payload power.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Magnetometer-Based Orbit And
    DEVELOPMENT OF MAGNETOMETER-BASED ORBIT AND ATTITUDE DETERMINATION FOR NANOSATELLITES THOMAS WRIGHT A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE GRADUATE PROGRAM IN EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCE YORK UNIVERSITY, TORONTO, ONTARIO AUGUST, 2014 © THOMAS WRIGHT, 2014 Abstract Attitude and orbit determination are critical parts of nanosatellite mission operations. The ability to perform attitude and orbit determination autonomously could lead to a wider array of mission possibilities for nanosatellites. This research examines the feasibility of using low-cost magnetometer measurements as a method of autonomous, simultaneous orbit and attitude determination for the novel application of redundancy on nanosatellites. Individual Extended Kalman Filters (EKFs) are developed for both attitude determination and orbit determination. Simulations are run to compare the developed systems with previous work on attitude and orbit determination. The EKFs are combined to provide both attitude and orbit determination simultaneously. Simulations are run and show that this approach for autonomous attitude and orbit determination on nanosatellites provides 8.5 and 12.5 km of attitude and orbit knowledge, respectively. The results of the simulations are then validated using Hardware-In-The-Loop (HITL) testing. Additionally, a Helmholtz cage is evaluated for future use in the HITL test setup. ii Acknowledgements I would like to acknowledge my supervisors Professor Sunil Bisnath and Professor Regina Lee for their guidance and support. I will carry the skills they helped me to develop through the rest of my career. I would also like to thank the grad students in both the GNSS and YuSEND Labs for their assistance and encouragement throughout my studies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017
    Federal Aviation Administration The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 January 2017 Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 i Contents About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover art: Phil Smith, The Tauri Group (2017) Publication produced for FAA AST by The Tauri Group under contract. NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. ii Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2017 GENERAL CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction 5 Launch Vehicles 9 Launch and Reentry Sites 21 Payloads 35 2016 Launch Events 39 2017 Annual Commercial Space Transportation Forecast 45 Space Transportation Law and Policy 83 Appendices 89 Orbital Launch Vehicle Fact Sheets 100 iii Contents DETAILED CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .
    [Show full text]
  • Quakesat As an Operational Example
    Using Nanosats as a Proof of Concept 3 for Space Science Missions:2 QuakeSat as an 1 Operational Example 5 4 Scott Flagg QuakeSat Mission Director August 2004 Background • Space science is expensive. • Bus, Instrument & Launch just under $100M. • Funding level not available for new and/or yet unproven scientific ideas. • Need lower cost option: NanoSats. Background Science Dr. Tony Fraser-Smith Data • Past researchers have seen ELF signals coincident with earthquakes. • Data set very small. • Not specifically looking for earthquake signals. • A number of countries and researchers pursuing Cosmos 1809 Data this area now. • Question: Does the correlation to earthquakes hold over a larger data set? Our Science Mission • Further investigate – What are the best frequencies to look for? – Necessary sensitivity? – Signal structure (wide or narrow frequency, etc) – Signal propagation path (needed to geo-locate signal origin, ie earthquake epicenter.) – What orbits best? – Other noise in the environment? QuakeSat • Triple CubeSat, under 5kgs • Magnetometer payload (1-1000 Hz, 4 filter modes, 16bit A-D.) • 66 MHz PC-104, 128Mb Flash memory • Ham radio, 9600 baud, AX.25 packets • Passive attitude control • 12 solar panels (10 triple junction GaAs cells ea) plus 2 Li Ion batteries QuakeSat Summary • Launched June 30, 2003 from Plesetsk Russia • 840km circular, sun synch orbit, “On the terminator”. • 408 days On-orbit. 3 • Over 2000 magnetometer2 collections downloaded. • Over 1000 satellite housekeeping TLM and support data files. • Over 500 Mbytes 1raw, binary magnetometer data. • Over 100 targeted locations collected.5 4 • 27 Signal Event Types identified. – Natural Signals include Lightning and Polar Hiss. – Man Made/Self Generated Signals include QuakeSat modem, SA bus related tone, CPU processing, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Spacecraft Mission Model Update
    Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) Report of the COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group Commercial Spacecraft Mission Model Update May 1998 Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation Federal Aviation Administration U.S. Department of Transportation M5528/98ml Printed for DOT/FAA/AST by Rocketdyne Propulsion & Power, Boeing North American, Inc. Report of the COMSTAC Technology & Innovation Working Group COMMERCIAL SPACECRAFT MISSION MODEL UPDATE May 1998 Paul Fuller, Chairman Technology & Innovation Working Group Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) Associative Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation Federal Aviation Administration U.S. Department of Transportation TABLE OF CONTENTS COMMERCIAL MISSION MODEL UPDATE........................................................................ 1 1. Introduction................................................................................................................ 1 2. 1998 Mission Model Update Methodology.................................................................. 1 3. Conclusions ................................................................................................................ 2 4. Recommendations....................................................................................................... 3 5. References .................................................................................................................. 3 APPENDIX A – 1998 DISCUSSION AND RESULTS........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • <> CRONOLOGIA DE LOS SATÉLITES ARTIFICIALES DE LA
    1 SATELITES ARTIFICIALES. Capítulo 5º Subcap. 10 <> CRONOLOGIA DE LOS SATÉLITES ARTIFICIALES DE LA TIERRA. Esta es una relación cronológica de todos los lanzamientos de satélites artificiales de nuestro planeta, con independencia de su éxito o fracaso, tanto en el disparo como en órbita. Significa pues que muchos de ellos no han alcanzado el espacio y fueron destruidos. Se señala en primer lugar (a la izquierda) su nombre, seguido de la fecha del lanzamiento, el país al que pertenece el satélite (que puede ser otro distinto al que lo lanza) y el tipo de satélite; este último aspecto podría no corresponderse en exactitud dado que algunos son de finalidad múltiple. En los lanzamientos múltiples, cada satélite figura separado (salvo en los casos de fracaso, en que no llegan a separarse) pero naturalmente en la misma fecha y juntos. NO ESTÁN incluidos los llevados en vuelos tripulados, si bien se citan en el programa de satélites correspondiente y en el capítulo de “Cronología general de lanzamientos”. .SATÉLITE Fecha País Tipo SPUTNIK F1 15.05.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK F2 21.08.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK 01 04.10.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK 02 03.11.1957 URSS Científico VANGUARD-1A 06.12.1957 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 01 31.01.1958 USA Científico VANGUARD-1B 05.02.1958 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 02 05.03.1958 USA Científico VANGUARD-1 17.03.1958 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 03 26.03.1958 USA Científico SPUTNIK D1 27.04.1958 URSS Geodésico VANGUARD-2A
    [Show full text]
  • 2001 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts
    2001 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts Federal Aviation Administration's Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation (AST) and the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) May 2001 ABOUT THE ASSOCIATE ADMINISTRATOR FOR COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION (AST) AND THE COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (COMSTAC) The Federal Aviation Administration’s senior executives from the U.S. commercial Associate Administrator for Commercial Space space transportation and satellite industries, Transportation (AST) licenses and regulates U.S. space-related state government officials, and commercial space launch activity as authorized other space professionals. by Executive Order 12465, Commercial Expendable Launch Vehicle Activities, and the The primary goals of COMSTAC are to: Commercial Space Launch Act of 1984, as amended. AST’s mission is to license and • Evaluate economic, technological and regulate commercial launch operations to ensure institutional issues relating to the U.S. public health and safety and the safety of commercial space transportation industry property, and to protect national security and foreign policy interests of the United States • Provide a forum for the discussion of issues during commercial launch operations. The involving the relationship between industry Commercial Space Launch Act of 1984 and the and government requirements 1996 National Space Policy also direct the Federal Aviation Administration to encourage, • Make recommendations to the Administrator facilitate, and promote commercial launches. on issues and approaches for Federal policies and programs regarding the industry. The Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) provides Additional information concerning AST and information, advice, and recommendations to the COMSTAC can be found on AST’s web site, at Administrator of the Federal Aviation http://ast.faa.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • Science and Technology Satellite Program of KOREA
    Science and Technology SATellite Program of KOREA NovemberNovember 2,2, 20042004 Korea Aerospace Research Institute Korea Aerospace Research Institute -1- Contents Introduction KITSAT (Korea Institute of Technology SATellite) STSAT (Science and Technology SATellite) KOMPSAT (KOrea Multi-Purpose SATellite) Satellite I&T Facilities at KARI Concluding Remarks Korea Aerospace Research Institute -2- Introduction Space Development Activities in Korea are based on the “National Space Program” (NSP) which was Initially established in 1996. According to the NSP, 20 Satellites are/will be Developed by 2015. - 8 KOMPSAT Series : Remote Sensing - 7 Science Satellites : Scientific Experiment, Technology Test - 5 GEO Satellites : Communication, Broadcasting, Meteorology Purpose of Science Satellites are - Space Observation and Sensing Space Environments - Various Scientific Experiments - Technology Development Korea Aerospace Research Institute -3- National Space Program : Satellites 2006 2001 2008 STSAT-3 2005 2007 1999 KOMPSAT-2 STSAT-2 KOMPSAT-1 2003 STSAT-1 2005 2008 2009 KOREASAT-5 COMS-1 KOMPSAT-3 1999 2009 KOREASAT-3 KOMPSAT-4 1999 KITSAT-3 2010 KOMPSAT-5 2011 2011 2012 STSAT-4 KOMPSAT-6 2014 2013 2015 2015 KOMPSAT-7 STSAT-5 STSAT-6 KOMPSAT-8 2014 2015 COMS-2 KOREASAT-6 KOMPSAT : KOrea Multi-Purpose SATellite KOREASAT : KOREA communication and broadcasting SATellite COMS : Communication, Ocean and Meteorological Satellite STSAT : Science & Technology SATellite Korea Aerospace Research Institute -4- KITSAT Korea Aerospace Research Institute
    [Show full text]