DOCSLIB.ORG

Registration Review Conventional Case Schedule 2015-2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Registration Review Conventional Case Schedule 2015-2017 US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs Registration Review Conventional Case Schedule 2015 - 2017 May 2015 5/5/2015 EPA/OPP Conventional Pesticide Cases: 1 of 67 (A) (C) Registration Review Schedule (P) (Q) Reg (J) First (L) RED (B) Registration Review RED (D) PC (I) Baseline (K) RED (N) Docket (O) Final Case AI Rev (E) CAS # (F) Active Ingredient Name Registere Status Case Name Case Code Date Status Opened Work Plan Coun Coun Case d Date # Scheduled t t # (M) Fiscal Yr (G) Chem Class 7203 Clomazone 125401 81777-89-1 Clomazone 02/27/86 02/27/86 N/A N/A 2007 02/02/07 07/02/07 1 1 7404 Hexythiazox 128849 78587-05-0 Hexythiazox 05/08/86 05/08/86 N/A N/A 2007 02/02/07 07/02/07 2 2 7210 Lactofen 128888 77501-63-4 Lactofen 04/01/87 04/01/87 N/A N/A 2007 02/02/07 07/02/07 3 3 7439 Cyromazine 121301 66215-27-8 Cyromazine 05/09/85 05/09/85 N/A N/A 2007 03/28/07 08/21/07 4 4 7211 Fomesafen 123802 108731-70-0 Sodium salt of fomesafen 04/10/87 04/10/87 N/A N/A 2007 03/28/07 08/25/07 5 5 7602 Clofentezine 125501 74115-24-5 Clofentezine 03/11/88 03/11/88 N/A N/A 2007 03/28/07 08/25/07 6 6 7002 Paclobutrazol 125601 76738-62-0 Paclobutrazol 06/06/85 06/06/85 N/A N/A 2007 03/28/07 08/23/07 7 7 7003 Triflumizole 128879 68694-11-1 Triflumizole 01/20/87 01/20/87 N/A N/A 2007 03/28/07 08/25/07 8 8 7001 Fenarimol 206600 60168-88-9 Fenarimol 03/19/85 03/19/85 N/A N/A 2007 03/28/07 07/02/07 9 9 7401 Fenoxycarb 125301 72490-01-8 Fenoxycarb 10/02/85 10/02/85 N/A N/A 2007 08/01/07 12/20/07 10 10 7213 Urea, sulfate (1:1) 128961 21351-39-3 Sulfuric acid, monourea 12/30/87 12/30/87 N/A N/A 2007 08/01/07 12/18/07 11 11 adduct 7209 Fenoxaprop 128701 66441-23-4 Fenoxaprop 02/05/87 02/05/87 N/A N/A 2007 08/29/07 02/29/08 12 12 5/5/2015 EPA/OPP Conventional Pesticide Cases: 2 of 67 (A) (C) Registration Review Schedule (P) (Q) Reg (J) First (L) RED (B) Registration Review RED (D) PC (I) Baseline (K) RED (N) Docket (O) Final Case AI Rev (E) CAS # (F) Active Ingredient Name Registere Status Case Name Case Code Date Status Opened Work Plan Coun Coun Case d Date # Scheduled t t # (M) Fiscal Yr (G) Chem Class 7407 Etofenprox 128965 80844-07-1 Benzene, 1-((2-(4- 04/21/88 04/21/88 N/A N/A 2007 08/29/07 01/10/08 13 13 ethoxyphenyl)-2- methylpropoxy)methyl)-3- phenoxy- 7202 Sulfosate 128501 81591-81-3 Sulfosate 11/14/85 11/14/85 N/A N/A 2007 N/A 07/02/07 14 14 7214 Pyridate 128834 55512-33-9 Pyridate 05/23/88 05/23/88 N/A N/A 2007 N/A 08/25/07 15 15 7209 Fenoxaprop 129092 71283-80-2 Propanoic acid, 2-{4-{(6- 02/05/87 08/15/91 N/A N/A 2007 Same Same 15 16 chloro-2- benzoxazolyl)oxy}phenoxy}- , ethyl ester, (R)- 5/5/2015 EPA/OPP Conventional Pesticide Cases: 3 of 67 (A) (C) Registration Review Schedule (P) (Q) Reg (J) First (L) RED (B) Registration Review RED (D) PC (I) Baseline (K) RED (N) Docket (O) Final Case AI Rev (E) CAS # (F) Active Ingredient Name Registere Status Case Name Case Code Date Status Opened Work Plan Coun Coun Case d Date # Scheduled t t # (M) Fiscal Yr (G) Chem Class 7005 Cyanamide 014002 420-04-2 Cyanamide 12/16/88 12/16/88 N/A N/A 2008 12/19/07 05/08/08 16 17 646 Aliette 646 123301 39148-24-8 Fosetyl-Al 12/01/90 05/28/86 Completed 12/01/90 2008 12/19/07 05/07/08 17 18 7219 Isoxaben 125851 82558-50-7 Isoxaben 12/04/89 12/04/89 N/A N/A 2008 12/19/07 06/13/08 18 19 7215 Quizalofop 128709 100646-51-3 Propanoic acid, 2-?4-?(6- 10/12/88 12/11/90 N/A N/A 2008 12/19/07 05/17/08 19 20 chloro-2- quinoxalinyl)oxyphenoxyU- , ethylester, (R)- 7215 Quizalofop 128711 76578-14-8 Quizalofop 10/12/88 10/12/88 N/A N/A 2008 12/19/07 05/17/08 19 21 7009 Sodium tetrathiocarbonate 128904 7345-69-9 Sodium tetrathiocarbonate 02/20/91 02/20/91 N/A N/A 2008 12/19/07 05/17/08 20 22 7222 Quinclorac 128974 84087-01-4 Quinclorac 01/14/91 01/14/91 N/A N/A 2008 12/19/07 05/30/08 21 23 7411 Sulfluramid 128992 4151-50-2 Sulfluramid 01/14/90 01/14/90 N/A N/A 2008 12/19/07 05/12/08 22 24 4019 Carbon and CO2 4019 016001 7440-44-0 Carbon 09/01/91 05/19/60 Completed 09/01/91 2008 03/26/08 08/15/08 23 25 4019 Carbon and CO2 4019 016601 124-38-9 Carbon dioxide 09/01/91 08/16/84 Completed 09/01/91 2008 03/26/08 08/15/08 23 26 4019 Carbon and CO2 4019 129083 #N/A Sawdust 09/01/91 12/21/67 Completed 09/01/91 2008 03/26/08 08/15/08 23 27 4001 Acetic acid, and salts 4001 044001 64-19-7 Vinegar 09/01/91 09/29/97 Completed 09/01/91 2008 03/26/08 08/21/08 24 28 5/5/2015 EPA/OPP Conventional Pesticide Cases: 4 of 67 (A) (C) Registration Review Schedule (P) (Q) Reg (J) First (L) RED (B) Registration Review RED (D) PC (I) Baseline (K) RED (N) Docket (O) Final Case AI Rev (E) CAS # (F) Active Ingredient Name Registere Status Case Name Case Code Date Status Opened Work Plan Coun Coun Case d Date # Scheduled t t # (M) Fiscal Yr (G) Chem Class 4081 Silica and silicates 4081 072602 63231-67-4 Silica gel 09/01/91 01/04/73 Completed 09/01/91 2008 03/26/08 08/01/08 25 29 4081 Silica and silicates 072604 6834-92-0 Sodium metasilicate 09/01/91 02/05/82 Completed 09/01/91 2008 03/26/08 08/01/08 25 30 4081 Silica and silicates 4081 072605 7631-86-9 Silicon dioxide 09/01/91 06/01/92 Completed 09/01/91 2008 03/26/08 08/01/08 25 31 4052 Inorg. nitrate/nitrite 4052 076103 7757-79-1 Potassium nitrate 09/01/91 05/19/60 Completed 09/01/91 2008 03/26/08 08/19/08 26 32 4052 Inorg. nitrate/nitrite 4052 076104 7631-99-4 Sodium nitrate 09/01/91 08/11/69 Completed 09/01/91 2008 03/26/08 08/19/08 26 33 31 Sulfur 31 077501 7704-34-9 Sulfur 03/01/91 04/02/48 Completed 03/01/91 2008 03/26/08 08/23/08 27 34 4078 Propionic acid, and salts 4078 077702 79-09-4 Propionic acid 09/01/91 07/26/72 Completed 09/01/91 2008 03/26/08 09/10/08 28 35 7224 Glufosinate 128850 77182-82-2 Glufosinate 05/29/91 05/29/91 N/A N/A 2008 03/26/08 08/21/08 29 36 2035 Bensulide 2035 009801 741-58-2 Bensulide OP 07/31/06 07/30/64 Completed 07/31/06 2008 06/25/08 11/13/08 30 37 145 Dicrotophos 145 035201 141-66-2 Dicrotophos OP 07/31/06 10/29/86 Completed 07/31/06 2008 06/25/08 11/13/08 31 38 18 Coumaphos 18 036501 56-72-4 Coumaphos OP 08/01/96 06/16/69 Completed 08/01/96 2008 06/25/08 11/20/08 32 39 5/5/2015 EPA/OPP Conventional Pesticide Cases: 5 of 67 (A) (C) Registration Review Schedule (P) (Q) Reg (J) First (L) RED (B) Registration Review RED (D) PC (I) Baseline (K) RED (N) Docket (O) Final Case AI Rev (E) CAS # (F) Active Ingredient Name Registere Status Case Name Case Code Date Status Opened Work Plan Coun Coun Case d Date # Scheduled t t # (M) Fiscal Yr (G) Chem Class 238 Diazinon 238 057801 333-41-5 Diazinon OP 07/31/06 06/03/71 Completed 07/31/06 2008 06/25/08 11/28/08 33 40 258 Oxydemeton-Methyl 258 058702 301-12-2 Oxydemeton-methyl OP 07/31/06 06/04/62 Completed 07/31/06 2008 06/25/08 11/07/08 34 41 6 Temephos 6 059001 3383-96-8 Temephos OP 09/01/00 07/09/65 Completed 09/01/00 2008 06/25/08 11/07/08 35 42 321 Tetrachlorvinphos & Gardo 321 083701 961-11-5 Tetrachlorvinphos OP 09/01/95 06/23/98 Completed 09/01/95 2008 06/25/08 11/26/08 36 43 321 Tetrachlorvinphos & Gardo 083702 22248-79-9 Gardona (cis-isomer) OP 09/01/95 07/09/74 Completed 09/01/95 2008 06/25/08 11/26/08 36 44 109 Terbufos 109 105001 13071-79-9 Terbufos OP 07/31/06 12/11/74 Completed 07/31/06 2008 06/25/08 11/11/08 37 45 2540 Profenofos 2540 111401 41198-08-7 Profenofos OP 07/31/06 10/14/81 Completed 07/31/06 2008 06/25/08 12/22/08 38 46 2550 Propetamphos 2550 113601 31218-83-4 Propetamphos OP 07/31/06 02/08/84 Completed 07/31/06 2008 06/25/08 11/20/08 39 47 7625 Denatonium saccharide 129045 90823-38-4 Benzenemethanaminium, 08/08/85 08/08/85 N/A N/A 2008 06/25/08 11/14/08 40 48 (Benzenemethanaminium N-(2-((2,6- ) dimethylphenyl)amino)-2- oxoethyl)-N,N-diethyl-, saccharide 4083 Soap salts 4083 079009 61789-31-9 Soap 09/01/92 11/13/95 Completed 09/01/92 2008 09/15/08 03/05/09 41 49 4083 Soap salts 4083 079021 67701-09-1 Potassium laurate 09/01/92 08/26/92 Completed 09/01/92 2008 09/15/08 03/05/09 41 50 5/5/2015 EPA/OPP Conventional Pesticide Cases: 6 of 67 (A) (C) Registration Review Schedule (P) (Q) Reg (J) First (L) RED (B) Registration Review RED (D) PC (I) Baseline (K) RED (N) Docket (O) Final Case AI Rev (E) CAS # (F) Active Ingredient Name Registere Status Case Name Case Code Date Status Opened Work Plan Coun Coun Case d Date # Scheduled t t # (M) Fiscal Yr (G) Chem Class 4083 Soap salts 4083 079095 143-18-0 Potassium oleate 09/01/92 01/22/91 Completed 09/01/92 2008 09/15/08 03/05/09 41 51 4083 Soap salts 4083 031801 84776-33-0 Ammonium soaps of fatty 09/01/92 07/28/93 Completed 09/01/92 2008 09/17/08 03/05/09 41 52 acids 7228 Trinexapac-ethyl 112602 95266-40-3 Trinexapac-ethyl 03/25/92 03/25/92 N/A N/A 2008 09/17/08 02/18/09 42 53 7226 Clethodim 121011 99129-21-2 Clethodim 01/28/92 01/28/92 N/A N/A 2008 09/17/08 12/12/09 43 54 7010 Flutolanil 128975 66332-96-5 Flutolanil 11/04/91 11/04/91 N/A N/A 2008 09/17/08 02/05/09 44 55 7229 Flumetsulam 129016 98967-40-9 Flumetsulam 03/25/92 03/25/92 N/A N/A 2008 09/17/08 04/06/08 45 56 27 Phosalone 27 097701 2310-17-0 Phosalone OP 01/01/01 07/10/86 TRED, 01/01/01 2008 N/A N/A 46 57 import only tolerances 333 Fenamiphos 333 100601 22224-92-6 Fenamiphos OP 05/01/02 04/06/72 IRED, 05/01/02 2008 N/A N/A 47 58 phase out 4001 Acetic acid, and salts 4001 044008 126-96-5 Sodium diacetate 09/01/91 04/02/81 Completed 09/01/91 2008 Same Same 47 59 5/5/2015 EPA/OPP Conventional Pesticide Cases: 7 of 67 (A) (C) Registration Review Schedule (P) (Q) Reg (J) First (L) RED (B) Registration Review RED (D) PC (I) Baseline (K) RED (N) Docket (O) Final Case AI Rev (E) CAS # (F) Active Ingredient Name Registere Status Case Name
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Restricted Use Product Summary Report
    Page 1 of 17 Restricted Use Product Summary Report (January 19, 2016) Percent Active Registration # Name Company # Company Name Active Ingredient(s) Ingredient 4‐152 BONIDE ORCHARD MOUSE BAIT 4 BONIDE PRODUCTS, INC. 2 Zinc phosphide (Zn3P2) 70‐223 RIGO EXOTHERM TERMIL 70 VALUE GARDENS SUPPLY, LLC 20 Chlorothalonil 100‐497 AATREX 4L HERBICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 42.6 Atrazine 100‐585 AATREX NINE‐O HERBICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 88.2 Atrazine 100‐669 CURACRON 8E INSECTICIDE‐MITICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 73 Profenofos 100‐817 BICEP II MAGNUM HERBICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 33; 26.1 Atrazine; S‐Metolachlor 100‐827 BICEP LITE II MAGNUM HERBICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 28.1; 35.8 Atrazine; S‐Metolachlor 100‐886 BICEP MAGNUM 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 33.7; 26.1 Atrazine; S‐Metolachlor 100‐898 AGRI‐MEK 0.15 EC MITICIDE/INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 2 Abamectin 100‐903 DENIM INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 2.15 Emamectin benzoate 100‐904 PROCLAIM INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 5 Emamectin benzoate 100‐998 KARATE 1EC 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 13.1 lambda‐Cyhalothrin 100‐1075 FORCE 3G INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 3 Tefluthrin Acetochlor; Carbamothioic acid, dipropyl‐ 100‐1083 DOUBLEPLAY SELECTIVE HERBICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 16.9; 67.8 , S‐ethyl ester 100‐1086 KARATE EC‐W INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 13.1 lambda‐Cyhalothrin 100‐1088 SCIMITAR GC INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION,
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,586,504 B2 Wright Et Al
    USOO85865.04B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,586,504 B2 Wright et al. (45) Date of Patent: Nov. 19, 2013 (54) HERBICIDAL COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS GLYPHOSATE AND A PYRONE ANALOG AU 100.73/92 B 10, 1992 CA 2340240 A1 2, 2000 (75) Inventors: Daniel R. Wright, St. Louis, MO (US); EP O 808 569 A1 11, 1997 Joseph J. Sandbrink, Chesterfield, MO GB 2267 825 A 12/1993 (US); Paul G. Ratliff, Olivette, MO WO 99/00013 1, 1999 WO OO,30452 6, 2000 (US) WO OO,642.57 11, 2000 WO OO/67571 11, 2000 (73) Assignee: Monsanto Technology LLC, St. Louis, WO O1/35740 A2 5, 2001 MO (US) WO 02/21924 A2 3, 2002 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this OTHER PUBLICATIONS patent is extended or adjusted under 35 Exhibit PMH-17 Supplemental Labeling regarding Roundup Pro U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. Herbicide by Monsanto, EPA Reg. No. 524-475 (Nov. 1995), 11 pageS. (21) Appl. No.: 13/404,861 Exhibit PMH-18 Notice of Pesticide Registration issued on Oct. 5, 2000, 35 pages. Exhibit PMH-19 EPA Application for Pesticide, ID No. 200405 (22) Filed: Feb. 24, 2012 (Sep. 1995), 33 pages. Exhibit PMH-20-Documentation regarding Starmas Racun/ (65) Prior Publication Data Rumpai Herbicide (bears the year 2003), 10 pages. Exhibit PMH-21—Documentation regarding Starmix Racun/ US 2012/O157309 A1 Jun. 21, 2012 Rumpai Herbicide (Date Unknown), 3 pages. Exhibit PMH-22—article entitled Control of Eucalyptus grandis cut stumps by Keith Little et al., ICFR Bulletin Series, No.
    [Show full text]
  • 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid
    2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid IUPAC (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid name 2,4-D Other hedonal names trinoxol Identifiers CAS [94-75-7] number SMILES OC(COC1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1Cl)=O ChemSpider 1441 ID Properties Molecular C H Cl O formula 8 6 2 3 Molar mass 221.04 g mol−1 Appearance white to yellow powder Melting point 140.5 °C (413.5 K) Boiling 160 °C (0.4 mm Hg) point Solubility in 900 mg/L (25 °C) water Related compounds Related 2,4,5-T, Dichlorprop compounds Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C, 100 kPa) 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is a common systemic herbicide used in the control of broadleaf weeds. It is the most widely used herbicide in the world, and the third most commonly used in North America.[1] 2,4-D is also an important synthetic auxin, often used in laboratories for plant research and as a supplement in plant cell culture media such as MS medium. History 2,4-D was developed during World War II by a British team at Rothamsted Experimental Station, under the leadership of Judah Hirsch Quastel, aiming to increase crop yields for a nation at war.[citation needed] When it was commercially released in 1946, it became the first successful selective herbicide and allowed for greatly enhanced weed control in wheat, maize (corn), rice, and similar cereal grass crop, because it only kills dicots, leaving behind monocots. Mechanism of herbicide action 2,4-D is a synthetic auxin, which is a class of plant growth regulators.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth Regulation and Other Secondary Effects of Herbicides Edivaldo D
    Weed Science 2010 58:351–354 Growth Regulation and Other Secondary Effects of Herbicides Edivaldo D. Velini, Maria L. B. Trindade, Luis Rodrigo M. Barberis, and Stephen O. Duke* As all herbicides act on pathways or processes crucial to plants, in an inhibitory or stimulatory way, low doses of any herbicide might be used to beneficially modulate plant growth, development, or composition. Glyphosate, the most used herbicide in the world, is widely applied at low rates to ripen sugarcane. Low rates of glyphosate also can stimulate plant growth (this effect is called hormesis). When applied at recommended rates for weed control, glyphosate can inhibit rust diseases in glyphosate-resistant wheat and soybean. Fluridone blocks carotenoid biosynthesis by inhibition of phytoene desaturase and is effective in reducing the production of abscisic acid in drought-stressed plants. Among the acetolactate synthase inhibitors, sulfometuron-methyl is widely used to ripen sugarcane and imidazolinones can be used to suppress turf species growth. The application of protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitors can trigger plant defenses against pathogens. Glufosinate, a glutamine synthetase inhibitor, is also known to improve the control of plant diseases. Auxin agonists (i.e., dicamba and 2,4-D) are effective, low-cost plant growth regulators. Currently, auxin agonists are still used in tissue cultures to induce somatic embryogenesis and to control fruit ripening, to reduce drop of fruits, to enlarge fruit size, or to extend the harvest period in citrus orchards. At low doses, triazine herbicides stimulate growth through beneficial effects on nitrogen metabolism and through auxin-like effects. Thus, sublethal doses of several herbicides have applications other than weed control.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Fate of Imidazolinone Herbicides and Their Enantiomers
    Title Environmental Fate of Imidazolinone Herbicides and Their Enantiomers in Soil and Water Mohammadkazem Ramezani B.Sc. Agronomy, M.Sc. Weed Science This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy of the University of Adelaide School of Agriculture, Food & Wine The University of Adelaide Waite Campus, South Australia 2007 Declaration This work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to this copy of my thesis, when deposited in the University Library, being made available for loan and photocopying. Mohammadkazem Ramezani ii Abstract Imidazolinones represent a new class of herbicides with low mammalian toxicity that can be used at low application rates, either pre- or post-emergence for the control of a wide range of weeds in broadleaf and cereal crops, and non-crop situations. All imidazolinone herbicides are chiral, containing two enantiomers that derive from the chiral centre of the imidazolinone ring. The inhibitory activity of the R(+) enantiomer is nearly eight times greater than that of the S(-) enantiomer. The use of imidazolinone herbicides has increased in recent years in Australia owing to increased popularity of pulses and the introduction of imidazolinone-tolerant canola and wheat. Concerns have been raised about the potential carry over damage to the subsequent crops grown in rotation with legumes and herbicide tolerant crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Herbicide Mode of Action Table High Resistance Risk
    Herbicide Mode of Action Table High resistance risk Chemical family Active constituent (first registered trade name) GROUP 1 Inhibition of acetyl co-enzyme A carboxylase (ACC’ase inhibitors) clodinafop (Topik®), cyhalofop (Agixa®*, Barnstorm®), diclofop (Cheetah® Gold* Decision®*, Hoegrass®), Aryloxyphenoxy- fenoxaprop (Cheetah®, Gold*, Wildcat®), fluazifop propionates (FOPs) (Fusilade®), haloxyfop (Verdict®), propaquizafop (Shogun®), quizalofop (Targa®) Cyclohexanediones (DIMs) butroxydim (Factor®*), clethodim (Select®), profoxydim (Aura®), sethoxydim (Cheetah® Gold*, Decision®*), tralkoxydim (Achieve®) Phenylpyrazoles (DENs) pinoxaden (Axial®) GROUP 2 Inhibition of acetolactate synthase (ALS inhibitors), acetohydroxyacid synthase (AHAS) Imidazolinones (IMIs) imazamox (Intervix®*, Raptor®), imazapic (Bobcat I-Maxx®*, Flame®, Midas®*, OnDuty®*), imazapyr (Arsenal Xpress®*, Intervix®*, Lightning®*, Midas®* OnDuty®*), imazethapyr (Lightning®*, Spinnaker®) Pyrimidinyl–thio- bispyribac (Nominee®), pyrithiobac (Staple®) benzoates Sulfonylureas (SUs) azimsulfuron (Gulliver®), bensulfuron (Londax®), chlorsulfuron (Glean®), ethoxysulfuron (Hero®), foramsulfuron (Tribute®), halosulfuron (Sempra®), iodosulfuron (Hussar®), mesosulfuron (Atlantis®), metsulfuron (Ally®, Harmony®* M, Stinger®*, Trounce®*, Ultimate Brushweed®* Herbicide), prosulfuron (Casper®*), rimsulfuron (Titus®), sulfometuron (Oust®, Eucmix Pre Plant®*, Trimac Plus®*), sulfosulfuron (Monza®), thifensulfuron (Harmony®* M), triasulfuron (Logran®, Logran® B-Power®*), tribenuron (Express®),
    [Show full text]
  • 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–18 Edition) § 455.61
    § 455.61 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–18 Edition) from: the operation of employee show- § 455.64 Effluent limitations guidelines ers and laundry facilities; the testing representing the degree of effluent of fire protection equipment; the test- reduction attainable by the applica- ing and emergency operation of safety tion of the best available tech- showers and eye washes; or storm nology economically achievable water. (BAT). (d) The provisions of this subpart do Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 not apply to wastewater discharges through 125.32, any existing point from the repackaging of microorga- source subject to this subpart must nisms or Group 1 Mixtures, as defined achieve effluent limitations rep- under § 455.10, or non-agricultural pes- resenting the degree of effluent reduc- ticide products. tion attainable by the application of the best available technology economi- § 455.61 Special definitions. cally achievable: There shall be no dis- Process wastewater, for this subpart, charge of process wastewater pollut- means all wastewater except for sani- ants. tary water and those wastewaters ex- § 455.65 New source performance cluded from the applicability of the standards (NSPS). rule in § 455.60. Any new source subject to this sub- § 455.62 Effluent limitations guidelines part which discharges process waste- representing the degree of effluent water pollutants must meet the fol- reduction attainable by the applica- lowing standards: There shall be no dis- tion of the best practicable pollut- charge of process wastewater pollut- ant control technology (BPT). ants. Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point § 455.66 Pretreatment standards for existing sources (PSES).
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2013/037955 Al 21 March 2013 (21.03.2013) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization I International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2013/037955 Al 21 March 2013 (21.03.2013) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every A01N 25/00 (2006.01) A OIN 43/653 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, A0 41/06 (2006.01) A01N 37/50 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, (21) Number: International Application DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, PCT/EP2012/068096 HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, (22) International Filing Date: KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, 14 September 2012 (14.09.2012) ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, (25) Filing Language: English RW, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, (26) Publication Language: English TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (30) Priority Data: 1118 1702.9 16 September 201 1 (16.09.201 1) EP (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): BAYER GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH [DE/DE]; Al- UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ, fred-Nobel-Str.
    [Show full text]
  • R Graphics Output
    Dexamethasone sodium phosphate ( 0.339 ) Melengestrol acetate ( 0.282 ) 17beta−Trenbolone ( 0.252 ) 17alpha−Estradiol ( 0.24 ) 17alpha−Hydroxyprogesterone ( 0.238 ) Triamcinolone ( 0.233 ) Zearalenone ( 0.216 ) CP−634384 ( 0.21 ) 17alpha−Ethinylestradiol ( 0.203 ) Raloxifene hydrochloride ( 0.203 ) Volinanserin ( 0.2 ) Tiratricol ( 0.197 ) trans−Retinoic acid ( 0.192 ) Chlorpromazine hydrochloride ( 0.191 ) PharmaGSID_47315 ( 0.185 ) Apigenin ( 0.183 ) Diethylstilbestrol ( 0.178 ) 4−Dodecylphenol ( 0.161 ) 2,2',6,6'−Tetrachlorobisphenol A ( 0.156 ) o,p'−DDD ( 0.155 ) Progesterone ( 0.152 ) 4−Hydroxytamoxifen ( 0.151 ) SSR150106 ( 0.149 ) Equilin ( 0.3 ) 3,5,3'−Triiodothyronine ( 0.256 ) 17−Methyltestosterone ( 0.242 ) 17beta−Estradiol ( 0.24 ) 5alpha−Dihydrotestosterone ( 0.235 ) Mifepristone ( 0.218 ) Norethindrone ( 0.214 ) Spironolactone ( 0.204 ) Farglitazar ( 0.203 ) Testosterone propionate ( 0.202 ) meso−Hexestrol ( 0.199 ) Mestranol ( 0.196 ) Estriol ( 0.191 ) 2,2',4,4'−Tetrahydroxybenzophenone ( 0.185 ) 3,3,5,5−Tetraiodothyroacetic acid ( 0.183 ) Norgestrel ( 0.181 ) Cyproterone acetate ( 0.164 ) GSK232420A ( 0.161 ) N−Dodecanoyl−N−methylglycine ( 0.155 ) Pentachloroanisole ( 0.154 ) HPTE ( 0.151 ) Biochanin A ( 0.15 ) Dehydroepiandrosterone ( 0.149 ) PharmaCode_333941 ( 0.148 ) Prednisone ( 0.146 ) Nordihydroguaiaretic acid ( 0.145 ) p,p'−DDD ( 0.144 ) Diphenhydramine hydrochloride ( 0.142 ) Forskolin ( 0.141 ) Perfluorooctanoic acid ( 0.14 ) Oleyl sarcosine ( 0.139 ) Cyclohexylphenylketone ( 0.138 ) Pirinixic acid ( 0.137 )
    [Show full text]
  • Reduction of Nitroaromatic Pesticides with Zero-Valent Iron
    Chemosphere 54 (2004) 255–263 www.elsevier.com/locate/chemosphere Reduction of nitroaromatic pesticides with zero-valent iron Young-Soo Keum, Qing X. Li * Department of Molecular Biosciences and Bioengineering, University of Hawaii, 1955 East-West Road, Ag Sci 218, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA Received 5 February 2003; received in revised form 4 June 2003; accepted 4 August 2003 Abstract Reduction of eleven nitroaromatic pesticides was studied with zero-valent iron powder. Average half-lives ranged from 2.8 to 6.3 h and the parent compounds were completely reduced after 48–96 h. The di-nitro groups of the 2,6- dinitroaniline herbicides were rapidly reduced to the corresponding diamines, with a negligible amount of partially reduced monoamino or nitroso products. Low levels of de-alkylated products were observed after 10 days. The nitro group of the organophosphorus insecticides was reduced dominantly to the monoamines but in a slower rate than the 2,6-dinitroanilines. A trace amount of oxon products was found. Reduction of nitro to amino was also the predominant reaction for the diphenyl ether herbicides. Aromatic de-chlorination and de-alkylation were minor reactions. These amine products were more stable than the parent compounds and 60% or more of the amines were detected after two weeks. Humic acid decreased the reduction rates of pendimethalin, and dichlone (a known quinone redox mediator) counteracted the effect of humic acid on the reactivity. Storage of iron powder under air decreased the reactivity very rapidly due to iron oxidation. Repeated use of iron powder also showed similar results. The reduced activity of air- oxidized iron was recovered by purging with hydrogen, but not nitrogen.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy of Imazapic/Imazapyr and Other Herbicides in Mixtures for The
    Efficacy of imazapic/imazapyr and other herbicides in mixtures for the control of Digitaria insularis prior to soybean sowing Efectividad de imazapic/imazapyr y otros herbicidas en mezclas para el control de Digitaria insularis en pre-siembra de soya Alfredo Junior Paiola Albrecht1, Leandro Paiola Albrecht1, André Felipe Moreira Silva²*, Romulo Augusto Ramos³, Everson Pedro Zeny³, Juliano Bortoluzzi Lorenzetti4, Maikon Tiago Yamada Danilussi4, and Arthur Arrobas Martins Barroso4 ABSTRACT RESUMEN Herbicide mixtures, use of multiple sites of action, and other Las mezclas entre herbicidas, el uso de múltiples sitios de acción weed management practices are necessary to avoid cases of y otras prácticas de manejo de malezas son necesarias para biotype resistance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the evitar otros casos de resistencia de biotipos. El objetivo de este efficiency of imazapic/imazapyr and other herbicides in mix- estudio fue evaluar la eficiencia de imazapic/imazapyr y otros tures to control Digitaria insularis at burndown before soybean herbicidas en mezclas para controlar Digitaria insularis en la sowing. This field research was conducted in Umuarama, State desecación antes de la siembra de soya. Esta investigación de of Parana (PR), Brazil, in the 2018/19 soybean season. The ex- campo se realizó en Umuarama, Estado de Paraná (PR), Brasil, periment was conducted in a randomized block experimental en la cosecha de soya de 2018/19. El experimento se realizó en design with four replicates and 11 treatments composed of the un diseño experimental de bloques al azar, con cuatro repe- application of glyphosate, clethodim, haloxyfop, imazapic/ ticiones y 11 tratamientos, compuestos por la aplicación de imazapyr, glufosinate, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), glifosato, cletodim, haloxifop, imazapic/imazapir, glufosinato, dicamba, triclopyr, and saflufenacil, in mixtures.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SAMPLING PLAN for Contaminants with a Vermont Health Advisory – May 2020
    PROPOSED PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SAMPLING PLAN For Contaminants with a Vermont Health Advisory – May 2020 Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Drinking Water & Groundwater Protection Division A Plan to Sample for Chemicals with a Vermont Health Advisory As required by Act 21 (2019), Section 10(b), the Secretary of the Agency of Natural Resources, on or before January 1, 2020, must publish for public review and comment a plan to collect data for contaminants in drinking water from public community water systems and all non-transient non-community water systems, for which a health advisory has been established, but no Maximum Contaminant Level has been adopted. These health advisories are referred to as Vermont Health Advisories (VHAs) in this document. 1 | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary …………………………………………………………………………………………..Page 3 II. Background ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… Page 4 III. Determining the VHA contaminants for sampling at public water systems ………..Page 6 IV. Sampling Considerations …..…………………………………………………………………………….. Page 10 V. Proposed Sampling Plan ………………………………………………………………………….………..Page 12 Attachments Table 1 Complete List of Vermont Health Advisories (VHAs) …………………………………………..Page 13 Table 2 Proposed List of VHAs with Potential Concern ……………………………………………………Page 18 2 | P a g e I. Executive Summary The Secretary of the Agency of Natural Resources was tasked with developing a sampling plan for public review, for certain drinking water contaminants that have an established health advisory, also known as the Vermont Health Advisory (VHA) but have no Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL). This Sampling Plan (Plan) is targeted to public community and public non- transient non-community water systems. To provide context for public water system regulation, and standards that apply, a discussion of how VHAs and MCLs are determined is given.
    [Show full text]