DOCSLIB.ORG

Using Consortial Collection Analysis to Inform Collection Development Bob Kieft Occidental College, [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Using Consortial Collection Analysis to Inform Collection Development Bob Kieft Occidental College, Kieft@Oxy.Edu View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Purdue E-Pubs Against the Grain Volume 27 | Issue 3 Article 42 2015 Curating Collective Collections--Collaborating to Build: Using Consortial Collection Analysis to Inform Collection Development Bob Kieft Occidental College, [email protected] Genya O'Gara James Madison University Libraries, [email protected] Anne Osterman VIVA, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/atg Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation Kieft, Bob; O'Gara, Genya; and Osterman, Anne (2015) "Curating Collective Collections--Collaborating to Build: Using Consortial Collection Analysis to Inform Collection Development," Against the Grain: Vol. 27: Iss. 3, Article 42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7771/2380-176X.7113 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. Curating Collective Collections — Collaborating to Build: Using Consortial Collection Analysis to Inform Collection Development by Genya O’Gara (Director of Collections, James Madison University Libraries & Educational Technologies) <[email protected]> and Anne Osterman (Deputy Director, VIVA) <[email protected]> Column Editor: Bob Kieft (College Librarian, Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA 90041) <[email protected]> Column Editor’s Note: Readers of this for flexible and collaborative spaces are grow- spectrum of VIVA institutions, including pub- column and participants in CRL’s Print Ar- ing. Simultaneously, academic libraries face lic, private, and community colleges. chive Network Forum (PAN) at ALA Midwinter a networked environment in which the prolif- SCS, now part of OCLC, offers a suite and Annual will be familiar with the many eration of new formats and evolving modes of services and tools that support libraries in collection analysis projects undertaken by of scholarly communication are shifting how de-accessioning and storage projects, including Sustainable Collections Services from Maine collections are developed. In order to remain providing detailed reports that place libraries’ to California, sea to shining sea, and the many integral intellectual hubs on campus, academic print monograph holdings in the larger context lakes and rivers in between. As Genya O’Gara libraries must innovate and work together more of other libraries and the national collection. and Anne Osterman point out in this case closely than ever before. SCS worked with each pilot library to ingest study from the Virtual Library of Virginia, those At a consortial level, the collaboration con- item, holding, and bibliographic records from analyses have focused on individual library versation around monographs often focuses on various ILS systems and returned reports to the and consortial efforts to identify copies of shared print repositories and weeding projects, project task force that combined local circula- older, less used monographs as candidates for aimed at freeing up space in overcrowded li- tion and item data with WorldCat holdings potential deaccessioning or retention in shared braries. In 2013, the Virtual Library of Virginia and other comparison data points. print agreements. VIVA’s case is different in (VIVA) consortium embarked on a collection The task force established four primary that they undertook their analysis in order to analysis project that allowed us to take a differ- goals in its first year: identify opportunities for collaboration on ent approach: VIVA focused on development • pilot a coordinated, consortial ap- collection building with both electronic and rather than deaccessioning, illuminating new proach to collection assessment; print monographs in English. Like the Orbis paths for building collaborative monographic collections. • use the data and analysis to inform Cascade Alliance, they also looked at the col- future collaborative collection devel- lective composition and use of their monograph VIVA is a consortium of seventy-two opment; collection in order to establish a guideline non-profit, academic libraries in Virginia. VIVA members are geographically distributed • identify scarcely-held titles in need number for new copies adequate to meeting of protection; and reader demand and preventing unnecessary across Virginia and represent public and private • begin a conversation about reducing duplication among VIVA’s 72 members. Here- colleges and universities both large and small, unnecessary duplication in the state. tofore, such proactive collection management as well as community colleges. Traditionally, strategies have been launched successfully VIVA has focused on coordinated collection Although other groups of libraries had among such small groups of proximate li- development of electronic resources and re- raised the issue of collaborative collection braries as the TriCollege Consortium of Bryn source sharing. Until this project, VIVA had no development, SCS’s analyses had typically em- history of collaboration with print monographs Mawr, Haverford, and Swarthmore Colleges phasized collaborative weeding, preservation, outside of resource sharing and had explored or shifting materials to shared repositories. For and the CBB Consortium of Colby, Bates, and only limited approaches to purchasing and VIVA, however, the initial, central goal was to Bowdoin Colleges, or in such larger groups as licensing eBooks. determine how to use the analysis to inform the Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries or future collection development. In order to Orbis Cascade with an emphasis on eBooks. In 2012, the VIVA Steering Committee expressed a desire to better understand the support truly effective cooperative purchasing, VIVA’s experience over the next several years VIVA’s team believed that the data itself should will be instructive for the shared collections bigger picture of the collective collection of the member libraries. Lacking a consortial drive the mapping of future projects. community in terms of how the collections union catalog, there was no clear sense of gaps, The task force therefore specified data pa- grow and the effects of the copy threshold overlaps, uniqueness, or strengths among the rameters that would enable better understanding guideline on resource-sharing services and on libraries, and the overall makeup of the large of the circulating monographic collections of the number of copies jointly held. In the latter circulating monographic collections was un- the participating libraries by focusing on the case, one of the hotter topics in the shared known. In response, a small working group kinds of books they were most likely to hold. collections community is gauging the right size formed to investigate and recommend an ap- With this goal in mind, excluded from the anal- of the collective inventory for meeting reader proach forward for VIVA that would provide ysis were special collections, medical and law demand over time as more text is available in a holistic view of the monographic holdings of collections, government documents, foreign lan- electronic form and more readers choose to the member libraries. guage materials, serials, and anything not within work with electronic text, not to mention how The working group recommended Sustain- the Library of Congress classification system. that inventory is distributed, housed, and de- able Collections Services (SCS)1 for an initial Included were all circulating English language livered. VIVA will contribute important BTUs cross-institutional title-level analysis of the print monographs from the institutions’ main to the discussion. — BK holdings of a representative group of libraries. libraries — approximately six million records VIVA member libraries were polled for their analyzed across the twelve pilot institutions. n the current competitive and dynamic interest in participating in the collection analy- The libraries’ holdings were compared with one higher education environment, academic sis and willingness to contribute a local project another, the consortium, the state, and the United libraries know they must develop new, col- manager to a task force who would work on States, as well as with HathiTrust, the Internet I 2 laborative approaches to building collections. the SCS analysis. Twelve libraries were then Archive, and selected peer library groups. Budgets are flat or deflating, and users’ needs selected for a pilot group representing the broad continued on page 68 Against the Grain / June 2015 <http://www.against-the-grain.com> 67 Chart 1 Curating Collective Collections from page 67 SCS provided the task force with a wealth of initial data based on the parameters outlined above. The task force then had to determine the questions to ask of the data. As VIVA wanted to use the data to inform decisions about the pur- chase of eBooks that might bring the most value across the consortium, the group looked for any obvious patterns in widely held and highly and recently circulated titles as well as relative shelf life by subject and publisher. The group also attempted to identify local disciplinary strengths based on distributed holdings by subject. “Widely held and highly and recently used,” for the purpose of this analysis, meant titles that were owned by ten or more VIVA libraries, had more than ten recorded uses at the owning li- brary, and had a last charge date of 2007 or later. Although it was acknowledged that this level of circulation would bias
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reordering Ranganathan: Shifting User Behaviours, Shifting Priorities
    ISSN (Print): 0972-2467 SRELS Journal of Information Management, Vol 52(1), February 2015, p. 3–23 ISSN (Online): 0976-2477 Reordering Ranganathan: Shifting User Behaviours, Shifting Priorities Lynn Silipigni Connaway* and Ixchel M. Faniel OCLC Research, OCLC, Dublin, Ohio, USA; [email protected], [email protected] Abstract S.R. Ranganathan’s Five Laws of Library Science provide a broad framework for designing and evaluating library programmes, activities and services. The laws continue to be extensively cited even today suggesting their continued revolution, currently available resources and services, and user behaviours. The idea has been to suggest how libraries andrelevance. librarians This can paper better attempts connect to to interpret those behaviours. the five laws After in examining the present the daychanging context roles of informationof the Five Laws abundance, on the basis digital of recommendations for realizing the intent of the laws have also been made. findings of recent research, the paper suggests reordering and reframing of the Five Laws of Library Science. A number of Keywords: Digital Environment, Five Laws of Library Science, Information Seeking Behaviour, Information Services, Web- Based Information Services. 1. Introduction Ranganathan, like Melville Dewey, came on the scene at a time when information was scarce; preserving library When Ranganathan proposed his Five Laws of Library collections was a major professional concern of librarians. Science, he came out with a comprehensive framework “Books are for use” was the driver. Dewey’s classification and guideline for evaluating library programmes, library system was essentially meant to help library users activities, and for formulating library policies and understand how to access materials.
    [Show full text]
  • It's Who Libraries Serve
    It’s Not What Libraries Hold; It’s Who Libraries Serve Seeking a User-Centered Future for Academic Libraries WHITE PAPER | JANUARY 2020 AUTHORS Gwen Evans, MLIS, MA OhioLINK, Executive Director [email protected] Roger C. Schonfeld Ithaka S+R, Director, Libraries, Scholarly Communication, and Museums [email protected] OhioLINK: In service to your users We are excited to share this white paper, “It’s Not be relevant to address our needs as we enable What Libraries Hold; It’s Who Libraries Serve— users in their research, learning, and teaching. Seeking a User-Centered Future for Academic Libraries,” our next step in envisioning library Through this process, our instincts have proven business needs in the context of integrated library correct: As our members’ scopes of service systems. You, our members, are the first to see continue to widen, integrated library systems it. As a preface, I want to explain its genesis, what maintain a narrow focus on the acquisition, it is and isn’t, and why we think it is important management, and delivery of objects. Our needs to you, your institution, and those you serve. have outpaced existing offerings. Access based on a narrow stream of products is no longer We know the business of higher education is enough. We need systems that support the ROI dramatically changing. Libraries are doing much of higher education institutions and provide great more than managing collections to support value to the range of our users, from students to teaching, learning, and innovative research; world-class researchers. Our focus is enabling we are managing services and products, and their collective activities and aspirations in then some—all while higher education is under their ever-expanding methods and forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Hi! Good Morning, All, and Thanks for Joining Us. I'm Karl Blumenthal. I'm a Web Archivist for the Internet Archive's “A
    Hi! Good morning, all, and thanks for joining us. I’m Karl Blumenthal. I’m a web archivist for the Internet Archive’s “Archive-It” service and partnership community. And to begin our discussion of of collaborative web archiving I’d like to introduce a little bit of web archiving’s history and how in fact it was collaboration among many different archivists, technologists, and organizations that made the practice what it is today, and indeed how the lessons learned from that early collaboration are just as vital and important to new web archivists and their subjects today as the ever were, which I think Amy and Sam can then demonstrate in even more living color. So before we dig any deeper into this topic we can first just agree on some specific terminology. What we mean when we say “web archiving” is something like this: its the process of collecting, preserving, and ultimately enabling end-user patron access to materials originally published to the web. There are myriad reasons why libraries and archives perform this labor, but in general, you may find: that the materials you have traditionally collected in print, bound and serial forms, have increasingly shifted to a web-based publishing paradigm--that local organization or academic department might no longer send you their materials on paper but instead may share it all online; and indeed your organization itself may need to meet its own records retention mandate by preserving materials only published to its website or even the website itself; increasingly web archiving is a means to preserve and provide enduring access to events and conversations that exist entirely online, like movements with social media presences.
    [Show full text]
  • Collective Collection Building and DDA
    Purdue University Purdue e-Pubs Charleston Library Conference Collective Collection Building and DDA Kerry Scott University of California, Santa Cruz, [email protected] Jim Dooley University of California, Merced, [email protected] Martha Hruska University of California, San Diego, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/charleston Part of the Library and Information Science Commons An indexed, print copy of the Proceedings is also available for purchase at: http://www.thepress.purdue.edu/series/charleston. You may also be interested in the new series, Charleston Insights in Library, Archival, and Information Sciences. Find out more at: http://www.thepress.purdue.edu/series/charleston-insights-library-archival- and-information-sciences. Kerry Scott, Jim Dooley, and Martha Hruska, "Collective Collection Building and DDA" (2013). Proceedings of the Charleston Library Conference. http://dx.doi.org/10.5703/1288284315306 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. Collective Collection Building and DDA Kerry Scott, Head, Research Support Services, University of California, Santa Cruz Jim Dooley, Head of Collection Services, University of California, Merced Martha Hruska, Associate University Librarian, Collection Services, University of California, San Diego Abstract Many librarians have advocated for the use of demand-driven acquisition (DDA) as an important money- saving approach
    [Show full text]
  • Strength in Numbers: the Research Libraries UK (RLUK) Collective Collection
    Strength in Numbers The Research Libraries UK (RLUK) Collective Collection Constance Malpas and Brian Lavoie Strength in Numbers: The Research Libraries UK (RLUK) Collective Collection Constance Malpas Research Scientist Brian Lavoie Research Scientist © 2016 OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ June 2016 OCLC Research Dublin, Ohio 43017 USA www.oclc.org ISBN: 978-1-55653-515-4 OCLC Control Number: 950534748 Please direct correspondence to: Constance Malpas Research Scientist [email protected] Suggested citation: Malpas, Constance, and Brian Lavoie. 2016. Strength in Numbers: The Research Libraries UK (RLUK) Collective Collection. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Research. http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/2016/oclcresearch-strength-in-numbers-rluk- collective-collection-2016-a4.pdf. Cover image: Map depicting the approximate locations of the 37 institutions comprising the RLUK membership. The ten RLUK members located in the London area are represented by a single large dot. FOREWORD Researchers and students all over the world benefit from the collections held by RLUK member libraries. These collections have grown over centuries: through purchases and donations, strategic subject building and happy accident, through collaboration and serendipity, all supported by a robust legal deposit system. We have exceptional individual collections, but we are becoming increasingly interested in the total collection within the UK. We are asking strategic questions about the preservation and storage of print books, the best use of library space, the range and effectiveness of digital surrogacy, and the nature of collecting. Our colleagues at OCLC have harnessed the unique possibilities offered by WorldCat to provide us with a window into what they have coined the “collective collection” across RLUK institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Ivy Plus Libraries, Director of Collections Initiatives Associate University Librarian Yale University New Haven, CT Requisition: 35052BR
    Ivy Plus Libraries, Director of Collections Initiatives Associate University Librarian Yale University New Haven, CT Requisition: 35052BR www.yale.edu/jobs Yale University offers exciting opportunities for achievement and growth in New Haven, Connecticut. Conveniently located between Boston and New York, New Haven is the creative capital of Connecticut with cultural resources that include two major art museums, a critically-acclaimed repertory theater, state-of-the-art concert hall, and world-renowned schools of Architecture, Art, Drama, and Music. Position Focus: The Ivy Plus Libraries (Brown, Chicago, Columbia, Cornell, Dartmouth, Duke, Harvard, Johns Hopkins, MIT, Princeton, University of Pennsylvania, Stanford, and Yale), comprising some of the greatest library collections in the world, seek an experienced, enthusiastic, and imaginative leader to plan, implement, and oversee new collaborative collections initiatives which will further integrate the vast riches of our collective collection while also expanding the breadth and depth of resources available, in any format and for scholars of today and tomorrow. The Director of Collections Initiatives serves as the principal planner, project manager, and negotiator for initiatives that promise substantial positive impacts in the development, management, and use of collections in any format. Although this senior-level position reports to the Yale’s University Librarian, it is the Ivy Plus Collection Development Group, especially its Executive Committee, which will partner with and guide the Director of Collections Initiatives to develop, implement, and assess efforts ranging from shared print storage capability to digital preservation, drawing on the unparalleled strengths of both the staff and the collections of the Ivy Plus institutions. The Director of Collections Initiatives assists or leads program planning, project management, and coordination of key collaborative initiatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Nachhaltige Infrastruktur Für Die Literatur- Und Informationsversorgung: Im Digitalen Zeitalter Ein Überholtes Paradigma – Oder So Wichtig Wie Noch Nie?
    Bibliothek, Forschung und Praxis 2014; 38(3): 344–364 Elmar Mittler Nachhaltige Infrastruktur für die Literatur- und Informationsversorgung: im digitalen Zeitalter ein überholtes Paradigma – oder so wichtig wie noch nie? Zusammenfassung: Durch die Informationsmacht der literature. The German Research Society (Deutsche For- Suchmaschinen ist im Zeitalter des Internet das Wissen in schungsgemeinschaft) has begun the redesign of the exis- Gefahr, kommerzialisiert zu werden. Informationelle Sou- ting system to adapt it to the digital revolution. Subject veränität zu besitzen, ist aber schon seit dem Altertum information services will now provide the information for auch von politischer Bedeutung. Die Infrastruktur für die special research communities. However, guidelines like wissenschaftliche Information in Deutschland ist durch the reduction of the collections to the material of imme- das System der überregionalen Sammelschwerpunkte ge- diate interest and the closing of special collections during prägt, die gewährleisten, dass auch spezielle Forschungs- the process of evaluation endanger the information infra- literatur zur Verfügung steht. Die Deutsche Forschungs- structure; thousands of journals have to be cancelled and gemeinschaft hat damit begonnen, dieses System der thousands of specialized titles will no longer be purcha- digitalen Publikationswelt anzupassen und Sondersam- sed. Planning on a broader horizon and a financial coope- melgebiete in Fachinformationsdienste umzuwandeln, die ration of the federal government and state governments
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Health Sciences and Biomedical Sciences Information and Services Provision by Ramune K
    c/o Katina Strauch 209 Richardson Avenue MSC 98, The Citadel Charleston, SC 29409 MLA, SLA, BOOK EXPO ISSUE TM VOLUME 26, NUMBER 2 APRIL 2014 ISSN: 1043-2094 “Linking Publishers, Vendors and Librarians” Trends in Health Sciences and Biomedical Sciences Information and Services Provision by Ramune K. Kubilius (Collection Development / Special Projects Librarian, Northwestern University, Galter Health Sciences Library) <[email protected]> he overarching title for this Against the “global health” or “one health.” The second ally, by participating in Grain (ATG) special issue builds on the was selected as the theme of the historic 2013 the initiatives of NLM, Ttitles used for the Nov. 2008 and Dec. annual meeting of the Medical Library As- their institutions, or 2011-Jan. 2012 special issues. Adding the sociation (MLA) and its partners in Boston, their professional as- concept of “services” to this special issue’s title MA. The National Program Committee sociations. Many health sciences librarians serves as a reminder that “if you build it,” they (NPC) worked for three years to create a belong to the MLA, a professional association (users) will not necessarily come (paraphrasing federated international meeting incorporating that has never focused on only one country. a phrase voiced in the movie, Field of Dreams). the 2013 Annual Meeting and Exhibition The International Cooperation Section of “Services,” as used in this context, incorporate of MLA, the 11th International Congress MLA celebrates its 25th anniversary in 2014. the necessary activities of marketing, training, on Medical Librarianship (ICML), the As T. Mark Hodges wrote in the section partnering, and collaborating.
    [Show full text]
  • Collective Collections Final Report
    Collective Collections Final Report September 25, 2015 revised November 15, 2015 Introduction The term “collective collections” refers to shared content and content that can potentially be shared across institutions. Collective collections can be in any format, are local, regional, national, and global. They provide more substantive and useful research experiences for scholars, students, and other interested parties than collections held by any single institution. Collective collections can encompass legacy print materials, rare and distinct (special) collections, research data, subscription-based and open digital content, and emerging forms of digital scholarship, all of which will require different tools, strategies, and partnerships to ensure current and future access and use. In all cases, the work of supporting the most effective access, retention, and preservation will take place through a collective investment that respects and supports local interest. As ARL leverages individual collections into a collective, we anticipate increasing institutional specialization in both content and expertise.1 ARL will stimulate the creation of deep and wide platforms for ensuring that knowledge resources essential to the academy and to support research and scholarship are accessible and sustained through federated networks of print, digital, data, and artifactual repositories, created and managed by collectives of institutions (e.g., HathiTrust) in North America and beyond. The SHARE initiative is a key part of this strategy, operating at the network level and unifying and making visible distributed resources. ARL activities should have high impact across the academy, not just for individual campuses or institutions. ARL’s work will not only guide the creation of governance, shared protocols, best practices, trusted relationships, and financial models, but will in some cases extend to convening parties to pursue the creation of new entities that conduct work in this space.
    [Show full text]
  • PAN Print Archive Agenda Annual 2021
    PRINT ARCHIVE NETWORK FORUM Agenda Friday, June 25, 2021, 12:00- 2:00 PM (Eastern) Location: Online All are welcome 12:00-12:05 (Eastern) Welcome & Announcements (5 minutes) (Matthew Revitt, Maine Shared Collections & EAST) 12:05-12:45 Updates (40 minutes) Rosemont: Last Copy Initiatives (Mark Jacobs, Executive Director, Washington Research Library Consortium (WRLC)) Partnership for Shared Book Collections: Research Agenda Ideas (Susan Stearns, Project Director, Eastern Academic Scholars' Trust (EAST)) WEST: Update to Disclosure Guidelines (Anna Striker, Shared Print Operations and Collections Analyst, WEST and UC Libraries; Cathy Martyniak, Director, UC SRLF; Corrie Hutchinson, Associate Director of ACTS Division & Head of Acquisitions at the University of Missouri.) 12:45-1:45 Shared Print in Collection Development (60 minutes) Retention, intention, and collaborative collection initiatives in Australian academic libraries (Ruth Baxter, Associate Director Collection Access and Development - University of Melbourne, Lisa McIntosh, Director Access Service, Sydney University and Monika Szunejko, Director Resources and Technology, Monash University) COPPUL Digitization and Collective Collections Services (Doug Brigham, SPAN Coordinator and Rebecca Dickson, Digital Stewardship Network Coordinator, COPPUL) Big Ten Alliance Collective Collection (Rebecca Crist, Project Manager Library Initiatives, Big Ten Academic Alliance) 1:45-2:00 Short Subjects (5 minutes) CRL’s Superseded Reference Book Collection (Jazmyn Taylor, Archivist in Residence, Center for Research Libraries) 2:00 Adjourn Sponsored by the Center for Research Libraries Founded in 1949, the Center for Research Libraries is a consortium of over 250 academic and independent research libraries in the U.S., Canada and Hong Kong. CRL supports advanced research and teaching in the humanities, sciences and social sciences by preserving and making available to scholars the primary source materials critical to those disciplines.
    [Show full text]
  • Operationalizing the BIG Collective Collection: a Case Study of Consolidation Vs Autonomy Lorcan Dempsey OCLC Research
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln August 2019 Operationalizing the BIG Collective Collection: A Case Study of Consolidation vs Autonomy Lorcan Dempsey OCLC Research Constance Malpas Independent Consultant Mark Sandler Novel Solutions Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, Scholarly Communication Commons, and the Scholarly Publishing Commons Dempsey, Lorcan; Malpas, Constance; and Sandler, Mark, "Operationalizing the BIG Collective Collection: A Case Study of Consolidation vs Autonomy" (2019). Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc.. 119. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/119 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Operationalizing the BIG Collective Collection: A Case Study of Consolidation $ vs Autonomy Lorcan Dempsey, Constance Malpas, Mark Sandler Operationalizing the BIG Collective Collection: A Case Study of Consolidation vs Autonomy Lorcan Dempsey OCLC Research Constance Malpas Independent Consultant Mark Sandler Novel Solutions in collaboration with © 2019 OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ August 2019 OCLC Research Dublin, Ohio 43017 USA www.oclc.org ISBN: 978-1-55653-099-9 DOI: 10.25333/jbz3-jy57 OCLC Control Number: 1112495814 ORCID iDs Lorcan Dempsey https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2925-8764 Constance Malpas https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9312-8294 Please direct correspondence to: OCLC Research [email protected] Suggested citation: Dempsey, Lorcan, Constance Malpas, and Mark Sandler.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report of the Canadian Collective Print Strategy Working Group
    Final Report of the Canadian Collective Print Strategy Working Group Group members: Table of Contents Summary of Recommendations .................................................................................................. 2 Timeline ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Context .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Recommendation for National Shared Print Network ........................................................... 8 Financial Sustainability ................................................................................................................ 13 Principles for a Retention Framework ..................................................................................... 15 Recommendations on Exposing Commitments .................................................................... 19 Program Evaluation and Review .............................................................................................. 20 APPENDIX A: National Overlap Study on Federal Publications ........................................ APPENDIX B: National Shared Print Calculation of Portion of Costs .............................. Summary of Recommendations Timeline Context Brian Lavoie, Lorcan Dempsey, and Constance Malpas. 2020.
    [Show full text]