List of the Participants of the First Annual Conference and General Meeting of the IAACA
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
To the Members of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights
SECRETARIAT AS/Jur (2017) CB 09 Rev 15 December 2017 To the members of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights Synopsis of the meeting held in Paris on 12 December 2017 The Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights, meeting in Paris on 12 December 2017, with Ms Olena Sotnyk (Ukraine, ALDE) in the Chair, as regards: Strengthening international regulations against trade in goods used for torture and the death penalty (Rapporteur: Mr Vusal Huseynov, Azerbaijan, EPP/CD): considered a draft report and unanimously adopted a draft recommendation; Appointment of rapporteurs: - Human rights situation in the occupied regions of Georgia: appointed Mr Pierre-Alain Fridez (Switzerland, SOC) and heard from him a declaration of absence of conflict of interest; - Protecting human rights during transfers of prisoners: appointed Mr Emanuel Mallia (Malta, SOC) and heard from him a declaration of absence of conflict of interest; - Out-of-court settlement procedures in criminal justice: advantages and risks: appointed Mr Boriss Cilevičs (Latvia, SOC) and heard from him a declaration of absence of conflict of interest; - Ensuring greater follow-up of CPT recommendations: enhanced role of the Parliamentary Assembly and of national parliaments: appointed Mr Damir Arnaut (Bosnia and Herzegovina, EPP/CD) and heard from him a declaration of absence of conflict of interest; - Withdrawing citizenship as a measure to combat terrorism: a human rights-compatible approach?: appointed Ms Tineke Strik (Netherlands, SOC) in her absence, subject to her making -
Prosecutions Division 刑事檢控科工作回顧
維護法治 UPHOLDING THE RULE OF LAW 2008 刑事檢控科工作回顧 PROSECUTIONS DIVISION PROSECUTIONS DIVISION 2008 由 刑事檢控專員 提交 律政司司長 A Review by The Director of Public Prosecutions for The Secretary for Justice 律政司刑事檢控科 出版 Published by the Prosecutions Division, Department of Justice 香港特別行政區 中國香港金鐘道66號金鐘道政府合署高座5-7樓 5th to 7th floors, High Block, Queensway Government Offices, 66 Queensway, Hong Kong, China 律政司 傳真號碼 Fax No : 852 2877 0171 Department of Justice 電子郵件 E-mail : [email protected] 互聯網網址 Internet Home Page Address : http://www.doj.gov.hk/eng/about/pd.htm Hong Kong Special Administrative Region 目錄 Contents 給律政司司長的信 Letter to the Secretary for Justice .........................................................4 刑事檢控專員 Director of Public Prosecutions 刑事檢控專員的序言 Director's Overview ..................................................................7 現代的檢控機關 A Modern Prosecution Service 2008年檢控政策 Prosecution Policy in 2008 ......................................................11 刑事司法措施 Criminal Justice Initiatives ......................................................14 2007至2012年度策略性發展計劃 Strategic Development Programme 2007-2012 ....................16 檢控人員守則 Code for Prosecutors ..............................................................18 刑事檢控專員諮詢小組 Director's Advisory Group ......................................................20 披露材料常設委員會 Standing Committee on Disclosure .......................................22 國際檢察官聯合會 International Association of Prosecutors ..............................24 近期發展和檢控罪行的工作 Recent Developments and the Prosecution -
Minutes Have Been Seen by the Administration)
立法會 Legislative Council Ref : CB2/PL/AJLS LC Paper No. CB(2)2188/09-10 (These minutes have been seen by the Administration) Panel on Administration of Justice and Legal Services Minutes of meeting held on Monday, 28 June 2010, at 4:30 pm in Conference Room A of the Legislative Council Building Members : Dr Hon Margaret NG (Chairman) present Hon Albert HO Chun-yan (Deputy Chairman) Hon James TO Kun-sun Hon LAU Kong-wah, JP Hon Emily LAU Wai-hing, JP Hon TAM Yiu-chung, GBS, JP Hon Audrey EU Yuet-mee, SC, JP Dr Hon Priscilla LEUNG Mei-fun Hon IP Wai-ming, MH Hon LEUNG Kwok-hung Member : Hon LI Fung-ying, BBS, JP attending Members : Dr Hon Philip WONG Yu-hong, GBS absent Hon Miriam LAU Kin-yee, GBS, JP Hon Timothy FOK Tsun-ting, GBS, JP Hon Paul TSE Wai-chun Public Officers : Item III attending The Administration Department of Justice Mr Ian Wingfield Solicitor General - 2 - Item IV Judiciary Administration Mr NG Sek-hon Deputy Judiciary Administrator (Operations) Item V The Administration Department of Justice Mr Ian Wingfield Solicitor General Mr Ian McWalters, SC Director of Public Prosecutions Mr David LEUNG Senior Assistant Director of Public Prosecutions Attendance by : Item III invitation Hong Kong Bar Association Mr P Y LO Council Member Item V Hong Kong Bar Association Mr Michael Blanchflower, SC Council Member Mr P Y LO Council Member The Law Society of Hong Kong Mr Stephen HUNG Council member and Chairman of the Criminal Law and Procedure Committee - 3 - Mr Kenneth NG Member of the Criminal Law and Procedure Committee Clerk in : Miss Flora TAI attendance Chief Council Secretary (2)3 Staff in : Mr KAU Kin-wah attendance Assistant Legal Adviser 6 Ms Elyssa WONG } Deputy Head } Research and Library Services Division } } For item V only Dr Yuki HUEN } Research Officer 8 } Ms Amy YU Senior Council Secretary (2)3 Ms Wendy LO Council Secretary (2)3 Mrs Fonny TSANG Legislative Assistant (2)3 Action I. -
Poetry Sampler
POETRY SAMPLER 2020 www.academicstudiespress.com CONTENTS Voices of Jewish-Russian Literature: An Anthology Edited by Maxim D. Shrayer New York Elegies: Ukrainian Poems on the City Edited by Ostap Kin Words for War: New Poems from Ukraine Edited by Oksana Maksymchuk & Max Rosochinsky The White Chalk of Days: The Contemporary Ukrainian Literature Series Anthology Compiled and edited by Mark Andryczyk www.academicstudiespress.com Voices of Jewish-Russian Literature An Anthology Edited, with Introductory Essays by Maxim D. Shrayer Table of Contents Acknowledgments xiv Note on Transliteration, Spelling of Names, and Dates xvi Note on How to Use This Anthology xviii General Introduction: The Legacy of Jewish-Russian Literature Maxim D. Shrayer xxi Early Voices: 1800s–1850s 1 Editor’s Introduction 1 Leyba Nevakhovich (1776–1831) 3 From Lament of the Daughter of Judah (1803) 5 Leon Mandelstam (1819–1889) 11 “The People” (1840) 13 Ruvim Kulisher (1828–1896) 16 From An Answer to the Slav (1849; pub. 1911) 18 Osip Rabinovich (1817–1869) 24 From The Penal Recruit (1859) 26 Seething Times: 1860s–1880s 37 Editor’s Introduction 37 Lev Levanda (1835–1888) 39 From Seething Times (1860s; pub. 1871–73) 42 Grigory Bogrov (1825–1885) 57 “Childhood Sufferings” from Notes of a Jew (1863; pub. 1871–73) 59 vi Table of Contents Rashel Khin (1861–1928) 70 From The Misfit (1881) 72 Semyon Nadson (1862–1887) 77 From “The Woman” (1883) 79 “I grew up shunning you, O most degraded nation . .” (1885) 80 On the Eve: 1890s–1910s 81 Editor’s Introduction 81 Ben-Ami (1854–1932) 84 Preface to Collected Stories and Sketches (1898) 86 David Aizman (1869–1922) 90 “The Countrymen” (1902) 92 Semyon Yushkevich (1868–1927) 113 From The Jews (1903) 115 Vladimir Jabotinsky (1880–1940) 124 “In Memory of Herzl” (1904) 126 Sasha Cherny (1880–1932) 130 “The Jewish Question” (1909) 132 “Judeophobes” (1909) 133 S. -
Yearly Review Shows Increase of Prosecution Workload in 2009 *********************************************************
Yearly Review shows increase of prosecution workload in 2009 ********************************************************* The Prosecutions Division of the Department of Justice saw an increase in workload in 2009, according to statistics published in its Yearly Review today (October 29). Criminal prosecutions and appeals conducted in court increased both in terms of the number of cases and the number of court days. The total number of cases was 5,455 in 2009, as compared to 4,981 in the previous year, representing an increase of 9.5%. The total number of court days went up 14% from 8,388 in 2008 to 9,564 in 2009. As a result, the total number of court days undertaken by in-house counsel has increased from 3,564 in 2008 to 4,299 in 2009, an increase of 20.6%. The court work undertaken by solicitors or barristers prosecuting for the division on fiat also increased, from 4,825 days in 2008 to 5,266 days in 2009, an increase of 9.1%. In terms of court level, the majority of appeals and Court of First Instance cases were conducted by in-house counsel, while fiat counsel were mainly called upon to prosecute cases at District and Magistrates Courts. Legal advice provided to law enforcement agencies also recorded an increase of 7.6% from 15,356 in 2008 to 16,520 in 2009. In the overview of the Division's Yearly Review, the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), Mr Ian McWalters, described 2009 as a year of transition. Upon assumption of office in October 2009, the new DPP felt that the time was right to review the division's structure to see whether changes should be made, having regard to the following goals: * Whatever structure was in place, it must be able to maximise the efficient use of counsel in the division; * Each part of the structure should be focused on servicing its core responsibilities; and * To improve the advocacy capacity of the Division by developing the advocacy skills of counsel and increasing the representation of the Division's prosecutors in all level of courts in Hong Kong. -
Hong Kong Bar Association Circular No
Hong Kong Bar Association Circular No. 245/19 To : All Members & Mess Members of the Bar Association From : Jonathan Chang – Honorary Secretary Date : 3 December 2019 PRACTICE NOTE : NEW PRACTICE WHERE FLAGRANT INCOMPETENCE IS ADVANCED AS A GROUND OF APPEAL Members’ attention is drawn to the Court of Appeal judgment in HKSAR v Apelete [2019] HKCA 1189 whereby a new practice is imposed by the Court where flagrant incompetence of legal representative(s) at trial is advanced as a ground of appeal: 1. An appellate counsel has a duty to satisfy himself that the ground is properly arguable, i.e. there is a palpably sound basis for such allegations to be made, failing which such allegations must never be advanced: see also HKSAR v Li Xiaoxiang (2018) 21 HKCFAR 272 at [31]. 2. In making that assessment, the appellate counsel must look for independent and objective evidence to support the complaint and, save where there are good and compelling reasons not to do so, make full and proper enquiries of the previous legal representatives at trial in relation to the complaint before articulating it as a ground of appeal. The appellate counsel must then add an appropriate certificate in the grounds of appeal that he has complied with this duty when relying on such a ground. 3. Further, a signed waiver of LPP from the applicant in respect of the trial legal representatives and an affirmation in support of the complaint must be filed at the same time as the ground of appeal. 4. If subsequent material comes to light casting doubt on the applicant’s claims, there is a continuing duty on the appellate counsel to evaluate the propriety of the grounds of the complaint. -
GRECO: Twelfth General Activity Report (2011)
Strasbourg, 23 March 2012 Greco (2012) 1E Final GRECO: Twelfth General Activity Report (2011) Thematic article : Corruption erodes Human Rights protection Adopted by GRECO 54 (20-23 March 2012) Directorate General I GRECO Secretariat F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex Human Rights and Rule of Law Council of Europe +33 3 88 41 20 00 Information Society and Action against www.coe.int/greco Fax +33 3 88 41 39 55 Crime Directorate GRECO – the Group of States against Corruption FOREWORD......................................................................................................... 3 Marin MRČELA – President of GRECO MISSION AND WORKING FRAMEWORK .............................................................. 4 2011 – RESULTS AND IMPACT ............................................................................ 5 MEMBERSHIP ..................................................................................................... 5 RATIFICATION OF COUNCIL OF EUROPE LEGAL INSTRUMENTS ................................ 5 EVALUATION PROCEDURES.................................................................................. 5 Third Evaluation Round (Theme I): Incriminations – main results .......................... 6 Third Evaluation Round (Theme II): Transparency of Party Funding – main results .. 7 COMPLIANCE PROCEDURES ................................................................................. 9 PARTNERSHIPS ................................................................................................ 11 EXTERNAL PARTNERS.........................................................................................11 -
Ukraine–Europe–World
150 Ukraine–Europe–World UDC 930.85(477) DOI 10.25128/2225-3165.19.01.17 Volodymyr Okarynskyi PhD (History), Associate professor, Department of History of Ukraine, Archaeology and Special Historical Studies, Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University (Ukraine) [email protected] ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6119-0678 H T P ' , , P ''( Y ( , '( ' ' , X' ' ' ' '' H I ( Y ( ) MUSIC THAT ROCKED THE SOVIETS: ROCK ’N’ ROLL IN DAILY LIFE OF YOUTH IN WESTERN UKRAINE DURING THE 1960S – EARLY 1980S Summary. The article covers the phenomenon of rock music in the lives of young residents of the western regions of Soviet Ukraine, which differed significantly from the rest of the territory of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic and the entire USSR. The article demonstrates the peculiarities among which this music was mastered, its existence in the youth society – from fashionable dance music to the core of nonconformitsm to the Soviet system. It was reflected in the names officially and unofficially used for rock music and its performers (Big beat, vocal-instrumental ensemble, etc.), as well as in relation to official factors (from tolerance to the prohibition). Consumers of rock music did not necessarily have to be opposed to the Soviet regime. However, the active “immersion” in rock music, and the related counterculture spheres (from the late 1960s onwards, and more and more), contributed to the formation of an alternative life style, which manifested itself in particular: listening to banned radio stations, the style of clothing that was associated with rock music, space for free performance / listening to rock music and exchanging information and impressions (“tusovka”). -
Anti-Corruption Conference the Un Convention Against Corruption Implementation & Enforcement: Meeting the Challenges
COMMONWEALTH SECRETARIAT & CHATHAM HOUSE ANTI-CORRUPTION CONFERENCE THE UN CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION IMPLEMENTATION & ENFORCEMENT: MEETING THE CHALLENGES CHATHAM HOUSE · LONDON · 24 TO 25 APRIL 2006 Commonwealth Secretariat COMMONWEALTH SECRETARIAT & CHATHAM HOUSE ANTI-CORRUPTION CONFERENCE THE UN CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION IMPLEMENTATION & ENFORCEMENT: MEETING THE CHALLENGES CHATHAM HOUSE · LONDON · 24 TO 25 APRIL 2006 Commonwealth Secretariat EXECUTIVE SUMMARY1 The United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) came into force on 14 December 2005 and as prescribed by this convention, the Conference of State Parties will be held later this year in order to promote and review implementation. The convening of this conference was organised with a view to taking forward the imple- mentation of UNCAC among those States that have signed to it. The presentations focused on key topics with time allocated for discussion on the issues arising out of those presentations. The objectives of the conference included: G addressing the problems faced in monitoring implementation by smaller, developing States by identifying those problems and highlighting the lessons from developed States; G encouraging effective international cooperation; G assisting participants to identify training and technical assistance needs; and G for Commonwealth States to take forward the Recommendations of the Commonwealth Expert Working Group on Asset Repatriation as mandated by the Heads of Government at the 2005 Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM). Those Recommendations include: putting in place comprehensive legis- lation and procedures for both conviction and non conviction-based confiscation, MLA on the basis of the Harare Scheme and direct enforcement of restraint and con- fiscation in response to a foreign request. OVERVIEW OF THE SESSIONS SESSION ONE UN CONVENTION & COMMONWEALTH INITIATIVES Speakers: Martin Polaine & Stuart Gilman G Disappointment was expressed at the number of discretionary provisions within the preventive chapter of UNCAC. -
Prosecutions Hong Kong 2018
PROSECUTIONS HONG KONG 2018 香港刑事檢控 PROSECUTIONS HONG KONG 2018 律政司司長 鄭若驊資深大律師 鄭司長： 謹呈上刑事檢控科 2018 年的工作回顧。 本科在 2018 年事務紛繁，科內檢控人員整年在“秉行公義者”的崗位上 盡忠職守，持正獨立進行檢控。儘管社會曾有聲音質疑若干檢控決定，我們 的檢控人員一如既往根據法律、可接納的證據所證明的事實及適用的政策或 指引，獨立理智地行事。在庭上，我們竭力協助法庭，以公正客觀的態度依 法秉公行義。 我們致力促進本科工作的透明度和問責性，讓公眾可全面恰當了解刑事 司法工作，但也緊記不能為求在人前彰顯公義，致使公義無法施行。我們會 繼續孜孜不怠促進市民認識本科工作。 縱使考驗頻仍，本科的檢控和支援人員一直全力以赴，成果驕人。謹向 科內全體同事致以謝忱。 刑事檢控專員 梁卓然資深大律師 2019 年 10 月 23 日 The Hon Teresa CHENG Yeuk-wah, GBS, SC, JP Secretary for Justice 23 October 2019 Dear Secretary for Justice, I am pleased to submit to you the Yearly Review of the Prosecutions Division for 2018. 2018 is an eventful year for the Division. Throughout the year, prosecutors in the Division upheld their role as “ministers of justice” in pursuance of fair and independent prosecution. Although there have been voices in the community questioning certain prosecutorial decisions, our prosecutors have, as always, acted independently and dispassionately on the basis of the law, the facts provable by admissible evidence and any applicable policy or guidelines. In court, we strived to assist the court to the fullest and to do justice according to the law in a fair and objective manner. We endeavour to promote transparency and accountability in our work so that the public may be fully and properly informed about the administration of criminal justice. We however bear in mind that the benefit of justice being seen to be done must not be allowed to result in justice not being done. We shall continue to work hard to promote public understanding of our work. I wish to take this opportunity to thank all my colleagues, both prosecutors and support staff, in the Division for their remarkable efforts and achievements in often challenging circumstances. -
Greco(2016)22
Strasbourg, 9 December 2016 Greco(2016)22 74th GRECO Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 28 November – 2 December 2016) SUMMARY REPORT Directorate General GRECO Secretariat F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex Human Rights and Rule of Law Council of Europe +33 3 88 41 20 00 Information Society and Action against www.coe.int/greco Fax +33 3 88 41 39 55 Crime Directorate I. Opening of the meeting 1. The 74th Plenary Meeting, held in Strasbourg on 28 November – 2 December 2016 was chaired by Marin MRČELA, President of GRECO (Croatia). The President opened the meeting by welcoming all participants, referring in particular to newly nominated Heads of delegation and representatives. Mr Frank RAUE (Germany), previous member of the Delegation of Germany, participating in the present meeting as Evaluator for the Fourth Round Evaluation of Georgia, was making his last appearance in GRECO due to a change in professional responsibilities. He expressed his appreciation for the cooperation and work carried out on-site and in the plenary. 2. The list of participants appears in Appendix I. II. Adoption of the Agenda 3. The agenda was adopted as it appears in Appendix II. III. Information Items President 4. The President had represented GRECO at the European Partners against Corruption (EPAC)/European Contact-Point Network against Corruption (EACN) Annual Professional Conference and General Assembly (Riga, 15-17 November), where he had outlined the main areas that would be focused on by GRECO in the Fifth Evaluation Round when looking into corruption prevention in law enforcement agencies, and more specifically in the police. He will also participate, on 15 December 2016, in an event organised by the University of Murcia: International Day on Transparency and Public Participation – towards a transparent society, at which he will contribute to a roundtable on A transparent executive (Murcia, 15 December). -
Income and Asset Disclosure
Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized DIRECTIONS IN DEVELOPMENT Finance Income and Asset Disclosure Public Disclosure Authorized Case Study Illustrations Public Disclosure Authorized Income and Asset Disclosure Stolen Asset Recovery (StAR) Series StAR—the Stolen Asset Recovery Initiative—is a partnership between the World Bank Group and the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) that supports international efforts to end safe havens for corrupt funds. StAR works with developing countries and financial centers to prevent the laundering of the proceeds of corruption and to facilitate more systematic and timely return of stolen assets. The Stolen Asset Recovery (StAR) Series supports the efforts of StAR and UNODC by providing practitioners with knowledge and policy tools that con- solidate international good practice and wide-ranging practical experience on cutting edge issues related to anticorruption and asset recovery efforts. For more information, visit www.worldbank.org/star. Titles in the Stolen Asset Recovery (StAR) Series Stolen Asset Recovery: A Good Practices Guide for Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture (2009) by Theodore S. Greenberg, Linda M. Samuel, Wingate Grant, and Larissa Gray Politically Exposed Persons: Preventive Measures for the Banking Sector (2010) by Theodore S. Greenberg, Larissa Gray, Delphine Schantz, Carolin Gardner, and Michael Latham Asset Recovery Handbook: A Guide for Practitioners (2011) by Jean-Pierre Brun, Larissa Gray, Clive Scott, and Kevin Stephenson Barriers to Asset Recovery: An Analysis of the Key Barriers and Recommendations for Action (2011) by Kevin Stephenson, Larissa Gray, and Ric Power The Puppet Masters: How the Corrupt Use Legal Structures to Hide Stolen Assets and What to Do About It (2011) by Emile van der Does de Willebois, J.C.