DOCSLIB.ORG

The New Maximianus the Elegies of Maximianus. Edited by Richard Webster, Classical Fellow of Princeton University

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The New Maximianus the Elegies of Maximianus. Edited by Richard Webster, Classical Fellow of Princeton University The Classical Review http://journals.cambridge.org/CAR Additional services for The Classical Review: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here The New Maximianus The Elegies of Maximianus. Edited by Richard Webster, Classical Fellow of Princeton University. Princeton Press. 1900. Studio sulle Elegie di Massimiano. Giardelli. Savona, 1899. Der Elegiker Maximianus. Von Prof. Dr F. Heege. Blaubeuren, 1893. Robinson Ellis The Classical Review / Volume 15 / Issue 07 / October 1901, pp 368 - 371 DOI: 10.1017/S0009840X00031000, Published online: 27 October 2009 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0009840X00031000 How to cite this article: Robinson Ellis (1901). The Classical Review, 15, pp 368-371 doi:10.1017/ S0009840X00031000 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/CAR, IP address: 132.239.1.231 on 14 Mar 2015 368 THE CLASSICAL REVIEW. Under the head of the 'Mood of Prohi- down by Hoffmann and widely current, but bition ' Dr. Lebreton naturally discusses the rejected now by Schmalz in his third edition. conclusions of Professor Elmer, to which he He acutely notices that if Riemann was does not consider that the articles contri- right in supposing cum in such cases to be buted to the Classical Review by Sir W. co-ordinating rather than subordinating, the Geddes, added anything of value; and sub- cum clause ought to go into the infinitive in mits them to a severe criticism, following reported speech, whereas it is always in the mostly the lines of Professor Bennett. He subjunctive. protests against the exclusion of the letters, There is a good discussion of the subjunc- as not representing the classical usage; tive in conditional sentences; but it does and insists on the prohibitive force of the not take us much farther than the view perfect subjunctive with nee, nihil and ne- stated so clearly by Mr. Roby, that the quidem, examining the examples of these mental attitude may be shifted between the constructions. With regard to ne with the clauses of a hypothesis. present subjunctive Dr. Lebreton holds that Several other points call for notice, such Professor Elmer is as lax in admitting as the use of the infinitive with a relative, cases, as he was severe in excluding them the omission of the subject of an infinitive, previously. There is an interesting collec- the use of the gerundive, the use of ab with tion of instances of the usage of quaeso, passive verbs, and the attaching of -que, -ne, a propos of the much-discussed Att. xiv., -ve to e. But enough has been said to show 1, 2, ' Tu, quaeso, quicquid novi (multaautem the nature and variety of the topics treated. exspecto) scribere ne pigrere'; in which Dr. It may just be remarked that in the Introduc- Postgate's view is duly noted, but not dis- tion there is a caveat against an undue as- cussed. The conclusion is that in Cicero sumption of resemblances between Cicero's there are forty-three instances of the perfect epistolary style and the diction of the Latin subjunctive in prohibitions, and not one comedians. Dr. Lebreton points out, what no decisive instance of the present. one has better indicated than Dr. Tyrrell, In dealing with the use of the moods in who is here criticised, that Cicero has not relative sentences, Dr. Lebreton adopts fully one, but a dozen epistolary styles ; and that the negative results of Dittmar's criticism of phrases natural in the letter to Lentulus, Professor W. G. Hale's theories (cf. C.R., would be quite out of place in writing to for December 1898); but considers him to Trebatius or Hirtius. Still it is clear that have failed completely in substituting for it the Letters must not be left out of account his rival theory of the ' polemical' force of in studying classical Latin prose. the subjunctive. The exegesis of the passages Whatever may be thought of particular quoted in this part of his book seems to me conclusions, Dr. Lebreton's studies show so particularly good. On Pro Sest. 67, 140, he much acuteness and diligence, and, so far as is quite clear in his support of Dr. Eeid's it has been possible to control them, so view as against Dr. Holden's. much accuracy, that all who have to do In discussing the usage of cum ' equiva- with the language of Cicero will do well to lent,' much use is made of the investigations keep them within easy reach for frequent of Lattmann, which, however, deal more reference, facilitated as this is by very full with the tense than with the mood. He indexes of subjects, of words, and of definitely rejects the theory of grammarians quotations. The last indeed almost amounts who like Madvig allow the use of the sub- to a grammatical commentary on the whole junctive imperfect with an ' equivalent * cum. works of Cicero. For cutn-tum Dr. Lebreton accepts the refut- A. S. WILKINS. ation by Professor Hale of the rules laid THE NEW MAXIMIANUS. The Ulegies of Maximianus. Edited by Der JElegiker Maximianus. VON PROF. DR. RICHAHD WEBSTER, Classical Fellow of F. HEEGE. Blaubeuren, 1893. Princeton University. Princeton Press. 1900. THESE three works on the Elegies of Maxi- Studio sulle Elegie di Afassimiano. GIAR- mianus, all within the compass of eight DELLI. Savona, 1899. years, and especially the first of them, open THE CLASSICAL REVIEW. 369 again, but hardly solve, the points in dispute Maximianus is the name of the poet himself : about the life, personality and date of the e.g. Bodl.2 after the poems has the words poet, his creed, and the relation of the MSS. explicit liber Maodmiani. But it must be to each other. Dr. Heege's programm is observed that the Eton MS., which is mainly occupied with the diction, syntax, acknowledged to be the best, has no heading and prosodial specialities of Maxim., and or conclusion of the kind : that Bo1 (Bodl. on these points is copious and erudite; it is 38) ends with a mere Finit: while Keg. 15 perhaps somewhat excessive in demonstrating A 7 has this colophon. how closely the language of the Elegies is Talibus infecte deponis uerba senecte modelled on the classical period, though it 1 is useful to be assured of this; and I may Scriptus ab auricamo maximiane lupo be allowed here once more to protest against in which the obviously corrupt auricamo the statistical record of the distribution of may perhaps represent an original ewrimaco dactyls and spondees in the verses of the or evnnachio, if we may make such an in- poet as not compensating the writer's ference from the form it bears in a marginal labour by any corresponding utility. note in the Antwerp edition of 1567 eumacho, The Savona professor's dissertation is which with other marginalia was written by divided into the following sections: 1. the younger P. Pithou, as he himself informs Morphology, including peculiarities in the us : contuli cum MS. Puteanorum fratrum comparison of adjectives, pronouns, verbs, Lutetiae MDCXI KAL SEP Petrus Pitkoeus.2 adverbs, prepositions, particles. 2. Syntax. Again, it would be easy and natural to This section is very well done, and forms an transfer the name which originally attached excellent introduction to the Elegies. to the hero of El. iv. 26 to the poet himself, 3. Locution. 4. Metric; short, but dwelling to say nothing of a mediaeval Maximianus on everything that can fairly be called of cent. XII. who wrote on old age, but of salient. 5. Imitation. 6. A critical ap- whom little is known. pendix treating many of the more difficult As regards the date of the author, passages. I have read this with great Webster, accepting the prevailing identifica- interest, and can recommend Giardelli's tion of Boetius in El. iii. with the philosopher lively and unpedantic style as likely to of that name, and considering it improbable make the poems, themselves lively and from the close resemblance to the Consolatio natural, more read and studied. traceable in many passages, that the poems These works, excellent so far as they go, can be far removed from Boetius' death in are, however, in importance, not comparable 524 A.D., and on the other hand, pointing to with the elaborate edition of It. Webster. the palpable imitations of Maxim, found in The volume, which is most beautifully the Xth and Xlth of the minor poems of printed at the Princeton Press, contains 128 Eugenius of Toledo, places them between octavo pages, of which the following is a 524 and the death year of Eugenius 657, short account. 1. Bibliography, giving a yet so that they lie much nearer to the 6th list of all the most recent dissertations, than to the 7th century. editions, or articles on Maxim. 2. Author- The arguments of Manitius in support of ship. 3. Manuscripts. 4. Text of the the poet being a Christian, Webster shows Elegies with a full app. crit. 5. Critical to be of an unsolid kind : we cannot argue Appendix mentioning most of the emenda- from the uncertain attitude of the philoso- tions which are of any importance. 6. Com- pher to the uncertain language of the poet. mentary. 7. Index. It is rather more probable that he was not Webster, remarking on the increasing a Christian. Heege, however, p. 6 note, unreality of Roman Elegy as exhibited from calls attention to three passages which to Tibullus to Ovid, on the fact that the Elegies me have a Christian ring. III. 83 Salute are little more than variations on the sancta, inquam, semperque intacta maneto theme • old age,' exhibiting in a formalistic Uirginitas : per me plena pudoris eris : I.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Johns Hopkins University Circulars
    [THIS NUMBER IS ESPECIALLY DEVOTED TO STATEMENTS OF THE WORK OF THE PAST YEAR AND TO THE PROGRAMMES FOR THE NEXT ACADEMIC YEAR.] JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY CIRCULARS. Pub/L~’/ied wit/i tAe approlation oft/ze Board of Trustees. No. 16.3 BALTIMORE, JULY, 1882. [PRICE5 CENTS. CALENDAR FOR THE ACADEMIC YEAR, 1882-83. September 19. Next Term Begins. September 20—23. Examinations for I~Iatricu1ation. September 26. Instructions Resumed. June 9, Next TermCloses. CONTENTS. PAGE. PAGE. Mathematics: Ancient and Modern Languages: Work of the Past Year, 218 Programme in Greek, Latin, Sanskrit, etc. 228 Programme for the Next Year, 219 Programme in German 229 Physics: Programme in English, 280 Work of the Past Year, 220 Programme in the Romance Languages 280 Programme for the Next Year, 220 History and Political Science: Chemistry: Work of the Past Year, 281 Work of the Past Year, 221 Programme for the Next Year, . 282 Programme for the Next Year, 222 Philosophy, Ethics, etc.: Biology: Work of the Past Year, 283 Work of the Past Year, . 223 Programmes forthe Next Year, 233 Programme for the Next Year, 224 Recent Appointments 234 Ancientand Modern Languages: Collegiate Instruction 235 Work in Ancient Languages, . 226 Degrees Conferred, 286 Work in Modern Languages 227 JYLEETINGS OF SOCIETIES. Scientific. First Wednesday of each month, Metaphysical. Second Tuesday of each Mathematical. Third Wednesday of each at 8P.M. month, at 8P.M. month, at 8P.M. S. H. Freeman, Secretary. B. I. Gilman, Secretary. 0. H. Mitchell, Secretary. Naturalists’ Field Club. Excursionseach Philological. First Friday of each month, Historical andPoliticalScience.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Nationalisation of the Old English Universities
    TH E NATIONALIZATION OF THE OLD ENGLISH UNIVERSITIES LEWIS CAMPBELL, MA.LLD. /.» l.ibris K . DGDEN THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES J HALL & SON, Be> • ON THE NATIONALISATION OF THE OLD ENGLISH UNIVERSITIES ON THE NATIONALISATION OF THE OLD ENGLISH UNIVERSITIES BY LEWIS CAMPBELL, M.A., LL.D. EMERITUS PKOFESSOK OF GREEK IN THE UNIVERSITY OF ST. ANDREWS HONORARY FELLOW OF BALLIOL COLLEGE, OXFORD LONDON: CHAPMAN AND HALL 1901 LK TO CHARLES SAVILE ROUNDELL My dear Roundell, You have truly spoken of the Act, which forms the central subject of this book, as " a little measure that may boast great things." To you, more than to anyone now living, the success of that measure was due ; and without your help its progress could not here have been set forth. To you, therefore, as of right, the following pages are in- scribed. Yours very sincerely, LEWIS CAMPBELL PREFACE IN preparing the first volume of the Life of Benjamin fowett, I had access to documents which threw unexpected light on certain movements, especially in connexion with Oxford University- Reform. I was thus enabled to meet the desire of friends, by writing an article on " Some Liberal Move- ments of the Last Half-century," which appeared in the Fortnightly Review for March, 1900. And I was encouraged by the reception which that article met with, to expand the substance of it into a small book. Hence the present work. I have extended my reading on the subject, and have had recourse to all sources of information which I found available.
    [Show full text]
  • Illinois Classical Studies
    LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN 880 V.2 Classics renew phaH=«= SS^S^jco The person charging this material is re- sponsible for its return to the library from which it was withdrawn on or before the Latest Date stamped below. Theft, mutilation, and underlining of books are reasons for disciplinary action and may result in dismissal from the University. UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN m\ k m OCT IS 386 Air, 1 ? i!;88 WOV 1 5 988 FEB 19 19! i^f' i;^ idi2 CLASSICS L161 — O-1096 ILLINOIS CLASSICAL STUDIES VOLUME II •977 Miroslav Marcovich, Editor UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS PRESS Urbana Chicago London 1 1977 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois Manufactured in the United States of America ISBN :o-252-oo629- O ^ Xl^ Preface Volume II (1977) o( Illinois Classical Studies is a contribution of the clas- sicists from the University of Illinois to the celebration of the Bicentennial of the American Revolution (1776-1976). It comprises twenty-one select contributions by classical scholars from Ann Arbor, Berkeley, Cambridge (England), Cambridge (Massachusetts), Chicago, London, New York, Philadelphia, Providence, St. Andrews, Stanford, Swarthmore, Toronto, Urbana and Zurich. The publication of this volume was possible thanks to generous grants by Dean Robert W. Rogers (Urbana-Champaign) and Dean Elmer B. Hadley (Chicago Circle). Urbana, 4 July 1975 Miroslav Marcovich, Editor .. : Contents 1 The Nature of Homeric Composition i G. p. GOOLD 2. The Mare, the Vixen, and the Bee: Sophrosyne as the Virtue of Women in Antiquity 35 HELEN F.
    [Show full text]
  • Postmaster & the Merton Record 2017
    Postmaster & The Merton Record 2017 Merton College Oxford OX1 4JD Telephone +44 (0)1865 276310 www.merton.ox.ac.uk Contents College News Features Records Edited by Merton in Numbers ...............................................................................4 A long road to a busy year ..............................................................60 The Warden & Fellows 2016-17 .....................................................108 Claire Spence-Parsons, Duncan Barker, The College year in photos Dr Vic James (1992) reflects on her most productive year yet Bethany Pedder and Philippa Logan. Elections, Honours & Appointments ..............................................111 From the Warden ..................................................................................6 Mertonians in… Media ........................................................................64 Six Merton alumni reflect on their careers in the media New Students 2016 ............................................................................ 113 Front cover image Flemish astrolabe in the Upper Library. JCR News .................................................................................................8 Merton Cities: Singapore ...................................................................72 Undergraduate Leavers 2017 ............................................................ 115 Photograph by Claire Spence-Parsons. With MCR News .............................................................................................10 Kenneth Tan (1986) on his
    [Show full text]
  • Tennyson, A. Mary F. Robinson, and Classical Meter
    Polymetrical Dissonance: Tennyson, A. Mary F. Robinson, and Classical Meter Ben GlAseR hat did A. Mary F. Robinson learn from her work as a translator of WGreek, Greek meter, and from her study of classical prosody more generally? What expressive possibilities did she garner from the study of a language whose prosody bears little to no resemblance to english, and whose adoption threatens to become less boon than boondoggle? What she learns, I will argue, is the power of irregulari ty and dissonance, of an english prosody which diverges from english metrical tradition and yet somehow remains rhythmically forceful. But beyond the technical achievement of her metrical translations, Robinson finds in her complex new prosodic technique a means of interrogating both her aesthetic and personal relationship to the world. Robinson’s re-tuning of english meter, ordered in particular through Greek choral meters and latin hendecasyllabics, diverges sharply from then contemporary accounts of both meter’s form and its function. This essay will show how Robinson discovers the linguistic possibility of creating a form of metrical strain by importing classical schemes and bringing them into contact with traditional iambic meters; it shows, furthermore, how this strain is anticipated (sometimes nervously) by contemporary prosodists like Coventry Patmore and John Addington symonds. The possibility of this dis- sonant prosodic form, adapted from classical meters, emerges in Victorian poetry most forcefully perhaps with Tennyson’s experiments with quantita- tive verse; while Robinson follows his example, inviting the kind of metrical strain found in Tennyson’s satirical and self-referential adoption of classical meters, she ultimately expands the value of this strain beyond the genre of riposte.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oxford Avianus the Fables of Avianus Edited, with Prolegomena
    The Classical Review http://journals.cambridge.org/CAR Additional services for The Classical Review: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here The Oxford Avianus The fables of Avianus edited, with prolegomena, critical apparatus, commentary, excursus, and index by Robinson Ellis, M.A., LL.D., Fellow of Trinity College, Oxford, University Reader in Latin. Oxford at the Clarendon Press. 1887. 8vo. pp. xliv, 151. 8s. 6d. John E. B. Mayor The Classical Review / Volume 1 / Issue 07 / July 1887, pp 188 - 193 DOI: 10.1017/S0009840X00182332, Published online: 27 October 2009 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0009840X00182332 How to cite this article: John E. B. Mayor (1887). Review of L. Frazier, and J. De Villiers 'Language processing and language acquisition' The Classical Review, 1, pp 188-193 doi:10.1017/ S0009840X00182332 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/CAR, IP address: 132.239.1.230 on 13 Apr 2015 188 THE CLASSICAL REVIEW. 16, e.g. irwppw and vurja-eoiv would not bethat mentioned by Mr. Scott on p. 41, likely to occur in inscriptions earlier than which is an odd combination of both systems 100 A.D. But et for i and vice versd is a (pap. 1414). On pp. 29, 30, Mr. Scott is common interchange from 100 B.C. onwards. surely right in reading (in what seems to be The peculiar substitution of i?a for «a in the conclusion of a lecture by Philodemus) words like eTT(/j.e\rja, eva-eftr/a, which became KOI T?I% KaXyjs M(i)A.i^TOD fj.r/ aTroaravTi SiairavTO'; extremely common in Augustan times (circa Eip^iwo), and in translating ' Irenaeus, who B-c.
    [Show full text]
  • The A.L. Smith Collections
    THE A.L. SMITH COLLECTIONS THE PAPERS AND LETTERS OF ARTHUR LIONEL SMITH MASTER OF BALLIOL 1916-1924 By Tim Procter Modern Manuscripts Assistant 1993 Catalogue copyright Balliol College 1993, 2012. Page 1 of 186 Table of Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................4 Biographical Summary..................................................................................................................... 4 ARTHUR LIONEL SMITH.................................................................................................................4 A.L. SMITH AND THE TEACHING OF HISTORY IN OXFORD ......................................................6 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. ...........................................................................6 THE PROVENANCE OF THE COLLECTION.................................................................................... 7 THE ARRANGEMENT OF THE COLLECTION................................................................................. 7 1. The Papers of A.L. Smith - General Arrangement. ......................................................................7 2. The Letters To A.L. Smith - Arrangement. .................................................................................10 3. Arrangement of the Collections - Summary. ..............................................................................10 ABBREVIATION NOTE. .................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary History of the Oxford Classical Texts
    Whitaker, G. ... brevique adnotatione critica ...: a Preliminary History of the Oxford Classical Texts. Published in: Classical Books: Scholarship and Publishing in Britain since 1800. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 2007. Bulletin (University of London. Institute of Classical Studies). Supplement; 101, 113-134 http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/3828/ Deposited on: 13 November 2007 Glasgow ePrints Service http://eprints.gla.ac.uk … BREVIQUE ADNOTATIONE CRITICA …: A PRELIMINARY HISTORY OF THE OXFORD CLASSICAL TEXTS Graham Whitaker (University of Glasgow) On 3 July 1896, at one of the less regular meetings of the Delegates of Oxford University Press (OUP) held during the Long Vacation,1 approval was given to publication of the Oxford Classical Texts (OCT) series. This approval was the outcome of discussions and proposals over more than ten years; indeed, it would be possible to take any one of several dates as marking the start of the series. While these earlier discussions need to be reviewed in order to explain why the series developed as it did when it did, this is also a preliminary attempt to look generally at the early history of the Texts, and its focus is the period to 1939, although some later developments in the series will also be mentioned. 1) Prehistory: a tale of false starts To set the series in its historical context it is necessary to go back to 1850 and the establishment of the Teubner library of Greek and Latin classics. This had provided in a small octavo format a revised text with an introduction, apparatus criticus and
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Robinson Ellis
    286 THE CLASSICAL REVIEW OBITUARY PROFESSOR ROBINSON ELLIS. THE death of Robinson Ellis has re- three of the best MSS. were discovered moved a great scholar from the world by the editor himself. The riddles of and a great figure from the life of mythological and historical allusion Oxford. He was seventy-nine years which constitute the greater part of the old, and had for a long time been in poem provided just the most suitable frail health. It was twenty years since material for Ellis's enormous knowledge his election as Professor; thirty since of recondite literature as well as for his his appointment as Reader in Latin; curious ingenuity. and probably all the Oxford Latinists Ellis cared, of course, for literature. of the present day are in different He wrote well in English and beauti- degrees his pupils. When the present fully in Latin. His metrical version writer was an undergraduate the two of Catullus, though hardly successful, volumes of Ellis's Catullus were the has in it a touch of real poetry. But great models of high and severe learn- as material to work upon he seems ing in the eyes of the average candidate actually to have rather avoided great for Honour Moderations; his Ibis stood literature. He liked the rare rather even higher, a thing more lifted above than the good. His object was not the criticism and stationed in a more rare- desire to elucidate a great writer, but fied atmosphere. rather the artist's delight in working The critical text of Catullus was pub- at difficult material.
    [Show full text]
  • A DOCUMENTARY ACCOUNT of the Foundation of the British Academy
    A DOCUMENTARY ACCOUNT OF The Foundation of the British Academy 1 Letter sent by the Secretaries of the Royal Society to certain ‘distinguished men of letters’, 21 November 1899 The Royal Society Burlington House, W. November 21, 1899 Sir, We are directed by the President and Council of the Royal Society to inform you that a project for the foundation of an International Association of Academies has been under consideration for some time. A preliminary gathering of representatives of the principal Academies of the world was held at Wiesbaden in the autumn of the present year [October 1899]. The enclosed “Proposed Statutes of Constitution and Procedure” will inform you as to the resolutions adopted. It is probable that the first formal meeting of the Association will be held in Paris in 1900, and that the resolutions of the Wiesbaden Conference will then be formally accepted as the basis of the constitution of the Association. Until the meeting took place at Wiesbaden, it was uncertain whether the Association would be formed of Scientific Academies only; but, as you will see, it was decided to form two sections, the one devoted to Natural Science, and the other to Literature, Antiquities and Philosophy. Although the conditions which Academies claiming admission must fulfil were not formally defined, it is understood (1) that no Society devoted to one subject or to a small range of subjects will be regarded as an “Academy”, and (2) that, as a rule, only one Academy will be admitted from each country to the literary and scientific sections respectively. So far as we are aware, there is no Society in England dealing with subjects embraced by the “Literary” Section which satisfies the first of these conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge E-Books Title Author Collection Name Volume Edition
    Cambridge E-Books Title Author Collection name Volume Edition The 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements Ronald A. Brand, Paul Herrup 1 Edited by Evencio Mediavilla, Santiago Arribas, Martin Roth, Jordi 3D Spectroscopy in Astronomy Cepa-Nogué, Francisco Sánchez 1 A. W. H. Phillips: Collected Works in Contemporary Perspective Edited by Robert Leeson 1 Edited by Vincenzo Antonuccio- AGN Feedback in Galaxy Formation Delogu, Joseph Silk 1 The Abolition of the African Slave-Trade by the British Parliament Thomas Clarkson 2 1 The Abolition of the Death Penalty in International Law William A. Schabas 3 Herbert Cole Coombs, Foreword by Aboriginal Autonomy Mick Dodson 1 Absolutism and Society in Seventeenth-Century France William Beik 1 An Account of Some Recent Discoveries in Hieroglyphical Literature and Egyptian Antiquities Thomas Young 1 Account of the Harvard Greek Play Henry Norman 1 An Account of the Present State of the Island of Puerto Rico George D. Flinter 1 Accountability of Armed Opposition Groups in International Law Liesbeth Zegveld 1 Accounting Principles for Lawyers Peter Holgate 1 Achieving Industrialization in East Asia Edited by Helen Hughes 1 Acquiring Phonology Neil Smith 1 Across Australia Baldwin Spencer, F. J. Gillen 2 1 Archibald John Little, Edited by Across Yunnan Alicia Little 1 Across the Jordan Gottlieb Schumacher 1 Across the Plains Robert Louis Stevenson 1 Acta Mythologica Apostolorum in Arabic Edited by Agnes Smith Lewis 1 Acts of Activism D. Soyini Madison 1 Fenton John Anthony Hort, Edited by Brooke Foss Westcott, Thomas The Acts of the Apostles Ethelbert Page 1 Acute Medicine J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Composition of the Territorial Air Force 1930
    The Territorial Air Force 1925-1957 – Officer Recruitment and Class Appendix 2 FRANCES LOUISE WILKINSON A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Wolverhampton for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 2017 This work or any part thereof has not previously been presented in any form to the University or to any other body whether for the purposes of assessment, publication or for any other purpose (unless otherwise indicated). Save for any express acknowledgments, references and/or bibliographies cited in the work, I confirm that the intellectual content of the work is the result of my own efforts and of no other person. The right of Frances Louise Wilkinson to be identified as author of this work is asserted in accordance with ss.77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. At this date copyright is owned by the author. Signature……………………………………….. Date…………………………………………….. Appendix Contents Pages Appendix 1 Officers of the reformed RAuxAF 4-54 Appendix 2 Officers commissioned into the RAuxAF With no squadron number given 55-61 Appendix 3 United Kingdom Officers of the Royal Air Force Volunteer Reserve 62-179 3 Officers of the Re-formed Royal Auxiliary Air Force 1946-1957 The following appendix lists the officers of the Royal Auxiliary Air Force by squadron. The date of commission has been obtained by using www.gazette-online.co.uk and searching the archive for each squadron. Date of commission data is found in the Supplements to the London Gazette for the date given. Where material has been found from other press records, interviews, books or the internet, this has been indicated in entries with a larger typeface.
    [Show full text]