DOCSLIB.ORG

Xerxes' Deliberate Expedition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Xerxes' Deliberate Expedition Xerxes’ Deliberate Expedition by B.C. Knowlton ook Seven of Herodotus’ Histories telling. It tells the standard narrative of conquer Greece.2 It would seem obvious Bcontains his account of the Persian the conflict between East and West, and it that Xerxes would take up and carry on expedition against Greece led by King tells of many ways in which the conflict his father’s campaign. Rise of an Empire Xerxes in 480 BCE. This campaign was more complicated than that. It tells treats all of this in an inaccurate and followed from the one undertaken ten not just how the Greeks and Persians fantastical way.3 According to Herodotus, years earlier on the orders of his father, came to fight each other, but who the however, initially it is not even obvious King Darius. That Persian force had Greeks and Persians were that they might that Xerxes would be the one to succeed landed at Marathon and been defeated by have fought, or not, but did. his father. Darius had an older son by an the Athenians in a famous battle that has Wherever it is possible to make use earlier wife, and he also had a claim to the ever since been considered a victory of of a movie to introduce students to a bit throne. Xerxes was the eldest son of European freedom over Oriental of history, the risk, or even the Darius’ last wife, Atossa; and Herodotus despotism. Xerxes, determined to avenge temptation, will be to let the movie take thinks that in the end it was her influence his father’s defeat, raised a force reported the place of the text.1 Students these days that secured the throne for her son.4 But by Herodotus to be of as many as two would rather see than read their history, he also tells us that it was at this moment and a half million fighting men, only to and often they would rather their history that the deposed Spartan king Demaratus come up against the 300 Spartans at the was belligerent than deliberate. But for arrived at the Persian court, and furnished Battle of Thermopylae. This narrative of teachers who would stick to the text if not Xerxes with a Spartan argument for the these and the subsequent battles of to the textbook, and who might prefer a superiority of his claim. Salamis and Plataea has been well known less warlike focus, I propose to essay a The question of succession had from its Herodotean source ever since; close reading and detailed explication of arisen because in the midst of the and the muscle-bound and blood- the Persian deliberations as recounted in preparations for the invasion of Greece, drenched deeds of the 300 have recently Herodotus’ Histories. I will follow the there was a revolt in Egypt. Another been made famous again by the movie of narrative thread of the episode and punitive expedition was ordered up, and that name. The more recent sequel to 300 pursue the thematic matters which, in a while Darius had apparently not planned begins with a less accurate account of the history class, could either lead to other to go to Greece himself, he does now plan Battle of Marathon; and, where the first readings or stand as characteristically to go to Egypt. Herodotus tells us that movie ended with Plataea under way, Rise Herodotean. Herodotus is, of course, a ‘according to Persian law the king may not of an Empire ends with victory at Salamis primary source for this history. This is not march with his army until he has named all but won. Courses in Western or World to say that his inquiries or researches (the his successor’ (7.2). This point of Persian History are likely to come upon the standard translations of the Greek title) law is of pertinent interest to us in that it Persian Wars, and the recent popular are strictly and straightforwardly wie es raises the question of whether and to movies might serve as an accessible and eigentlich gewesen. But the Histories is the best what extent a Persian king is bound to engaging introduction to these historical and often the only source we have for the abide by Persian law or custom (the Greek events and developments. But Herodotus’ Persian Wars, and it is historiographically word nomos translates both ways). The account of how Xerxes came to his significant even where it may not be Persian monarchy is typically depicted as decision to invade Greece, with its historically accurate. absolute, in contrast to the constitutional consideration of politics, rhetoric, and Darius had died while preparations regimes of Greece (whether the religion, is, if not as thrilling, at least as were under way for his second attempt to constitution be democratic, as in Athens, The Journal of Classics Teaching 17 (34) p.49-54 © The Classical Association 2016. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits Downloaded non-commercialfrom https://www.cambridge.org/core re-use, distribution,. IP andaddress: reproduction 170.106.35.76 in any, on medium,27 Sep 2021 provided at 10:35:00 the, originalsubject to work the Cambridge is unaltered Core and terms is properly of use, available cited. The at written 49 https://www.cambridge.org/core/termspermission of Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2058631016000246 University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work. or aristocratic, as in Sparta). A Persian figure in this history, and to point to other heroic Greeks and villainous Persians king, it is usually assumed, can do episodes in the Histories.10 that popular versions of this history give whatever he wants, and is not bound by Xerxes was not at first as determined us. Demaratus is an oligarchical exile, but any law.5 As we will see, Persian kings do as his father had been to invade Greece; Sparta is determined to resist the Persian have to take into account Persian nomoi. and not only because he had an Egyptian invasion – as Demaratus tells Xerxes, The question of succession having rebellion to contend with. That he was as very frankly (7.101-104). The Aleuadae come up, Herodotus gives us a detailed determined as Darius had been to punish of Thessaly, however, are in Persia to account of its resolution. Darius’ elder the Egyptians suggests that Xerxes wasn’t negotiate the ‘medising’ of that region son, Artabazanes, argued that it was ‘by simply disinclined to undertake a of Greece, which means their universal custom’ that he was ‘entitled to campaign. But he evidently needed to be submission to Xerxes. The Greeks inherit his father’s position’ (7.2). This convinced to undertake the campaign referred to the Persians as ‘Medes’, and anticipates the significance of the against the Greeks; and here his advisor many Greek cities did in fact side with deliberation where it specifies Persian Mardonius is like that servant of Darius the Persians in their invasion. The custom. And then of course his father’s who had been ordered to say to him each Pisistratidae were the successors of the position is that of Persian King. Atossa, time he sat down to eat, ‘Master, Athenian tyrants Peisistratus and his son the mother of Xerxes, was ‘the daughter remember the Athenians’ who several Hippias, who had ruled Athens prior to of Cyrus, who won the Persians their years earlier had supported a revolt of the establishment of democracy by freedom’ (7.2). Darius had not been a son Ionian Greeks who were subject to the Cleisthenes in 509 BCE.12 Hippias was of Cyrus, but rather the leader of a group Persian King (5.105). ‘“Master,” exiled from Athens and taken in by the of Persian aristocrats who had Mardonius would say to Xerxes, “the Persians. He had accompanied the overthrown a usurping successor.6 He Athenians have done us a great injury, Persian force that landed at Marathon; thereupon married the daughter of Cyrus, and it is only right that they should be had it defeated the Athenians, Hippias which had enhanced his legitimacy; and punished for their crimes”’ (7.5). On the would have been installed as satrap in now for her son to succeed him is more in other hand, Mardonius is not like that Attica. The presence of these Greek line with the dynasty. The significance of servant of Darius, for Darius had ordered exiles at the Persian court reminds us Cyrus having not simply been Persian him to do as he did, having already that, on the one hand, there were Greek King but having given the Persians their decided to attack Athens. Xerxes is at first cities who stood up to the Persians, and freedom complicates both the opposition actually ‘not at all interested in invading others that gave in; and that on the other between Persia and Greece and the Greece’ (7.4), and Mardonius takes it on there were even within cities factions definition of freedom usually assumed by himself to nag him about it. There is a that were either for or against resistance readers. Cyrus had given the Persians kind of politic logic to this part of to Xerxes. freedom from the Medes, by whom they Mardonius’ argument, but another part That oracular character also warrants had been subjected.7 From then on, the strikes a decidedly false note: for ‘to the a close reading. He is ‘an Athenian named Medes were subject to the Persians.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historically Speaking
    Historically Speaking Marathon at 2,500 ugust 12 marks an accepted date for By BG John S. Brown Greeks recently conquered by Persia rose the 2,500th anniversary of the Battle in revolt. Athens and the tiny city-state of A U.S. Army retired of Marathon, although the actual date Eretria attempted to assist, but the Per- may instead be September 12, depending upon how one sians utterly crushed the Ionians. Darius resolved to crush interprets the Lacedaemonian lunisolar calendar. The most Athens and Eretria as well and to bring the European Greeks notable commemoration will probably be the Athens into his orbit. Had he succeeded, he would have snuffed out Marathon this year, and other marathons around the world the democratic experiment, independent Hellenic civiliza- will undoubtedly take notice as well. Ironically, the ardu- tion and Greek national identity with a single stroke. ous 26-mile race is based upon an athletic performance by After preliminary operations in Thrace and Macedonia, the legendary Philippides that may not have actually oc- Darius launched a naval expedition directly across the curred. The battle itself did occur and is rightly regarded Aegean Sea. Securing—or devastating—islands en route, as among the most decisive in history. Marathon is ar- the Persians sacked Eretria and landed an army more than guably the first major battle for which we have a reliable twice the size of what Athens could muster in the sheltered record, provided largely by the world’s first actual histo- Bay of Marathon. Hippias recommended the spot, both be- rian, Herodotus.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Freed Athens? J
    Ancient Greek Democracy: Readings and Sources Edited by Eric W. Robinson Copyright © 2004 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd The Beginnings of the Athenian Democracv: Who Freed Athens? J Introduction Though the very earliest democracies lildy took shape elsewhere in Greece, Athens embraced it relatively early and would ultimately become the most famous and powerful democracy the ancient world ever hew. Democracy is usually thought to have taken hold among the Athenians with the constitutional reforms of Cleisthenes, ca. 508/7 BC. The tyrant Peisistratus and later his sons had ruled Athens for decades before they were overthrown; Cleisthenes, rallying the people to his cause, made sweeping changes. These included the creation of a representative council (bode)chosen from among the citizens, new public organizations that more closely tied citizens throughout Attica to the Athenian state, and the populist ostracism law that enabled citizens to exile danger- ous or undesirable politicians by vote. Beginning with these measures, and for the next two centuries or so with only the briefest of interruptions, democracy held sway at Athens. Such is the most common interpretation. But there is, in fact, much room for disagree- ment about when and how democracy came to Athens. Ancient authors sometimes refer to Solon, a lawgiver and mediator of the early sixth century, as the founder of the Athenian constitution. It was also a popular belief among the Athenians that two famous “tyrant-slayers,” Harmodius and Aristogeiton, inaugurated Athenian freedom by assas- sinating one of the sons of Peisistratus a few years before Cleisthenes’ reforms - though ancient writers take pains to point out that only the military intervention of Sparta truly ended the tyranny.
    [Show full text]
  • Marathon 2,500 Years Edited by Christopher Carey & Michael Edwards
    MARATHON 2,500 YEARS EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SUPPLEMENT 124 DIRECTOR & GENERAL EDITOR: JOHN NORTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS: RICHARD SIMPSON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS PROCEEDINGS OF THE MARATHON CONFERENCE 2010 EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 2013 The cover image shows Persian warriors at Ishtar Gate, from before the fourth century BC. Pergamon Museum/Vorderasiatisches Museum, Berlin. Photo Mohammed Shamma (2003). Used under CC‐BY terms. All rights reserved. This PDF edition published in 2019 First published in print in 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN: 978-1-905670-81-9 (2019 PDF edition) DOI: 10.14296/1019.9781905670819 ISBN: 978-1-905670-52-9 (2013 paperback edition) ©2013 Institute of Classical Studies, University of London The right of contributors to be identified as the authors of the work published here has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Designed and typeset at the Institute of Classical Studies TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory note 1 P. J. Rhodes The battle of Marathon and modern scholarship 3 Christopher Pelling Herodotus’ Marathon 23 Peter Krentz Marathon and the development of the exclusive hoplite phalanx 35 Andrej Petrovic The battle of Marathon in pre-Herodotean sources: on Marathon verse-inscriptions (IG I3 503/504; Seg Lvi 430) 45 V.
    [Show full text]
  • The Family Connection of Alcibiades and Axiochus , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 27:2 (1986:Summer) P.173
    STANLEY, PHILLIP V., The Family Connection of Alcibiades and Axiochus , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 27:2 (1986:Summer) p.173 The Family Connection of Alcibiades and Axiochus Phillip V. Stanley LTHOUGH THE ANCESTRY of the Athenian general Alcibiades A III remains obscure for the sixth century, his genealogy is as­ sumed to be secure for the fifth. The descent of the family from Alcibiades I to Alcibiades IV has been reconstructed by Vander­ pool in the following way:l Alcibiades J2 I Cleinias I I Alcibiades II I I Axiochus Cleinias II I I I I Cleinias III Alcibiades III Cleinias IV I Alcibiades IV I E. Vanderpool, "The Ostracism of the Elder Alcibiades," Hesperia 21 (I952) 1-8, esp. 6. Cr. M. B. Wallace, "Early Greek Proxenoi," Phoenix 24 (I 970) 196f; 1. K. DAVIES, Athenian Propertied Families (Oxford 1971 [hereafter APF)) 10-12. According to Isoc. 16.25f (delivered by Alcibiades IV, son of the general), Alcibiades I, the ally of Cleisthenes when he expelled Hippias from Athens, was the great-grandfather (1TpO- 1Ta1T1To~) of Alcibiades III. The general difficulty stems from the apparent need to reduce the number of generations separating Alcibiades I from Alcibiades III, believed to be five: if the number is not reduced, Alcibiades I would actually be the great-great­ grandfather of the general. 2 Roman numerals are those assigned in PA and APF. These numerals will continue to be used even when homonyms are added to the family's genealogy. In order to avoid the confusion that might result if a major overhaul of the numerical system for this family were attempted, and to preserve the numerical descent established for the branch of the family to which Alcibiades III belongs, the newly identified individual will be assigned the next available Roman numeral, even though he may be earlier than an individual with the same name whose number is lower.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tyrannies in the Greek Cities of Sicily: 505-466 Bc
    THE TYRANNIES IN THE GREEK CITIES OF SICILY: 505-466 BC MICHAEL JOHN GRIFFIN Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of Classics September 2005 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Firstly, I would like to thank the Thomas and Elizabeth Williams Scholarship Fund (Loughor Schools District) for their financial assistance over the course of my studies. Their support has been crucial to my being able to complete this degree course. As for academic support, grateful thanks must go above all to my supervisor at the School of Classics, Dr. Roger Brock, whose vast knowledge has made a massive contribution not only to this thesis, but also towards my own development as an academic. I would also like to thank all other staff, both academic and clerical, during my time in the School of Classics for their help and support. Other individuals I would like to thank are Dr. Liam Dalton, Mr. Adrian Furse and Dr. Eleanor OKell, for all their input and assistance with my thesis throughout my four years in Leeds. Thanks also go to all the other various friends and acquaintances, both in Leeds and elsewhere, in particular the many postgraduate students who have given their support on a personal level as well as academically.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript of “The Greeks: Crucible of Civilization” Episode One: “The Birth of Democracy”
    Transcript of “The Greeks: Crucible of Civilization” Episode One: “The Birth of Democracy” Transcript of PBS Video - The Greeks: Crucible of Civilization Part 1 – The Birth of Democracy 0:00 – Series Introduction: The Significance of the Greeks The Greeks. A people glorious and arrogant, valiant and headstrong. These were the men and women who laid the very foundations of Western Civilization. Their monuments still recall perhaps the most extraordinary two centuries in history, a time that saw the birth of science and politics, philosophy, literature and drama. [A time that] saw the creation of art and architecture we still strive to equal. And the Greeks achieved all this against a backdrop of war and conflict, for they would vanquish armies, navies, and empires many times their size, and build an empire of their own which stretched across the Mediterranean. For one brief moment, the mighty warships of the Greeks ruled the seas, their prosperity unequalled. These achievements, achievements which still shape our world, were made not by figures lost to time, but by men and women whose voices we can still hear, whose lives we can follow, men such as Themistocles, one of the world’s greatest military generals; Pericles, a politician of vision and genius; and Socrates, the most famous philosopher in history. This is the story of these astonishing individuals, of the rise and fall of a civilization that changed the world. 2:35 – Episode Introduction: The Revolution 508 BC. Five centuries before the birth of Christ. In a town called Athens, a tiny city in mainland Greece, pandemonium ruled the streets.
    [Show full text]
  • Cleisthenes Knows That for His Revolution to Succeed, It Must Give People Sufficient Incentive to Participate in It to Make It
    First Draft (Incomplete) Kleisthenes and the Ascent of Democracy Krishna K. Ladha <[email protected]> Department of Politics, New York University, New York, NY 10003 Abstract Who is Kleisthenes? What is democracy? How did it come into being? Kleisthenes conceived democracy as a strategy to attain power by proposing the Athenian constitution as an instrument of a lasting compromise between two militarily equipped factions of Athens: the hoplites and the nobility. Based on the history of Athens, this paper formulates a dynamic game of complete information that Kleisthenes faced in the sixth century BCE. The innovative solution to the game is a new system of government: democracy. To implement democracy, Kleisthenes faced two problems: the problem of constitution design and the problem of factions that lay beyond constitution. The solution to the first is the Athenian constitution, and the solution to the second is the tribal reform. The main accomplishments of the Athenian democracy are the following: (a) it offered domestic peace, economic well being, and the capability to withstand or dominate foreign powers, and (b) it was self-enforcing. The paper seeks to highlight Kleisthenes’s thinking, a thinking that reflects a great command of the economics of information, mechanism design and game theory. 1 October 2003 Kleisthenes and the Ascent of Democracy Krishna K. Ladha [email protected] Department of Politics, New York University, New York, NY 10003 Cleisthenes … [established] laws and a constitution that was admirably balanced so as to promote harmony between the citizens and security for the whole state. Plutarh (1960, p. 167) Introduction Kleisthenes installed democracy in Athens in 507 BCE.
    [Show full text]
  • Views on the Nature of Human Relations And, Ultimately, the Historical Process
    INFORMATION TO USERS While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this manuscript, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. For example: • Manuscript pages may have indistinct print. In such cases, the best available copy has been filmed. • Manuscripts may not always be complete. In such cases, a note will indicate that it is not possible to obtain missing pages. • Copyrighted material may have been removed from the manuscript. In such cases, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, and charts) are photographed by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is also filmed as one exposure and is available, for an additional charge, as a standard 35mm slide or as a 17”x 23” black and white photographic print. Most photographs reproduce acceptably on positive microfilm or microfiche but lack the clarity on xerographic copies made from the microfilm. For an additional charge, 35mm slides of 6”x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography. Order Number 8726642 Fathers and sons in the Histories of Herodotus Greenberger, Jeff Steven, Ph.D. The Ohio State University, 1987 UMI 300 N. Zeeb Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48106 PLEASE NOTE: In all cases this material has been filmed in the best possible way from the available copy. Problems encountered with this document have been identified here with a check mark .
    [Show full text]
  • Rejection and Integration: State Reactions to the Evolution of Dionysian Mystery Cult In
    Rejection and Integration: State Reactions to the Evolution of Dionysian Mystery Cult in Greece and Rome by Andrew Noakes A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in Classical Studies Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2019 © Andrew Noakes 2019 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract This thesis examines the integration of Dionysian mystery cults into the state religions of Greek polis and the Roman Republic. The cults are often portrayed as controversial and immoral in myth and literature, but the official reactions of various ancient city states never restricted the cult’s rituals or showed any concern over moral degeneracy. Rather, official reactions from the state pertained solely to leadership and organization of the cults. This thesis proposes that the reason for this is that Dionysian mystery cults provided an opportunity for women to obtain leadership, authority, and self definition through a means that was usually restricted to only a small number of women who obtained official state priesthoods. Therefore integration of the cults and restriction on leadership was the most common reaction, with some allowances still made for the cults to exist in private forms. When this opportunity for leadership, authority and self definition was opened up to men, as in the case of the Roman Bacchanalia, the state reacted much more harshly since the cult now provided a social structure that undermined those of the Roman Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Religious Thought from Homer to the Age of Alexander
    'The Library of Greek Thought GREEK RELIGIOUS THOUGHT FROM HOMER TO THE AGE OF ALEXANDER Edited by ERNEST BARKER, M.A., D.Litt., LL.D. Principal of King's College, University of London tl<s } prop Lt=. GREEK RELIGIOUS THOUGHT FROM HOMER TO THE AGE OF ALEXANDER BY F. M. CORNFORD, M.A. Fellow and Lecturer of Trinity College, Cambridge MCMXXIII LONDON AND TORONTO J. M. DENT & SONS LTD. NEW YORK: E. P. DUTTON tf CO. HOTTO (E f- k> ) loUr\ P. DOTTO/U TALKS ) f^op Lt=. 7 yt All rights reserved f PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN TO WALTER DE LA MARE INTRODUCTION The purpose of this book is to let the English reader see for himself what the Greeks, from Homer to Aristotle, thought about the world, the gods and their relations to man, the nature and destiny of the soul, and the significance of human life. The form of presentation is prescribed by the plan of the series. The book is to be a compilation of extracts from the Greek authors, selected, so far as possible, without prejudice and translated with such honesty as a translation may have. This plan has the merit of isolating the actual thought of the Greeks in this period from all the constructions put upon it by later ages, except in so far as the choice of extracts must be governed by some scheme in the compiler's mind, which is itself determined by the limits of his knowledge and by other personal factors. In the book itself it is clearly his business to reduce the influence of these factors to the lowest point; but in the introduction it is no less his business to forewarn the reader against some of the consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • Pisistratus and Homer
    The Classical Quarterly http://journals.cambridge.org/CAQ Additional services for The Classical Quarterly: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here Pisistratus and Homer. T. W. Allen The Classical Quarterly / Volume 7 / Issue 01 / January 1913, pp 33 - 51 DOI: 10.1017/S0009838800016736, Published online: 11 February 2009 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0009838800016736 How to cite this article: T. W. Allen (1913). Pisistratus and Homer.. The Classical Quarterly, 7, pp 33-51 doi:10.1017/ S0009838800016736 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/CAQ, IP address: 128.122.253.212 on 28 Apr 2015 PISISTRATUS AND HOMER. AN aspect of Pisistratus, which has not hitherto been utilized in this question (see p. 50), appears to justify another presentment of the evidence which connects him with the Homeric tradition. I shall endeavour to be brief and not to repeat what is common property or irrelevant. The literature and the bearing of the controversy are given with his usual clearness by P. Cauer, Grundfragen der Homerkritik,2 pp. 125 sqq. Cauer's private doctrine, that Homer was for the first time written down by Pisistratus, I consider sufficiently refuted by C. Rothe, Die Was als Dichtung, pp. 5-13. Fantastic views lately promulgated in England are1 dealt with conclusively to my mind by Mr. A. Lang, The World of Homer, pp. 281 sqq., to whose account nothing for con- troversial purposes need be added. On looking back over the literature I find myself most in agreement with Hans Flach, whose treatise, Die litterarische Thdtigkeit des Peisistratos, 1885, has been unduly depreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • STUDIES in the DEVELOPMENT of ROYAL AUTHORITY in ARGEAD MACEDONIA WILLIAM STEVEN GREENWALT Annandale, Virginia B.A., University
    STUDIES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF ROYAL AUTHORITY IN ARGEAD MACEDONIA WILLIAM STEVEN GREENWALT Annandale, Virginia B.A., University of Virginia, 1975 M.A., University of Virginia, 1978 A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Corcoran Department of History University of Virginia May, ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the elements which defined Argead kingship from the mid-seventh until the late fourth centuries B.C. It begins by reviewing the Argead king list where it is argued that the official reckoning of the dynasty's past was exploited in order to secure the throne against rivals, including those who were Argeads. Chapter Two analyzes the principles of Argead succession and concludes that the current theories on the subject are unsatisfactory in face of the e v id enc e. Ra the r, the sources suggest that Argead succession was a function of status where many ingredients were considered before a candidate 1 eg it ima te 1 y ass urned the throne. Among the factors influencing the selection were, the status of a potential heir's mother, age, competence, order of birth, and in lieu of father to son succession, relation to the late monarch. Chapter Three outlines the development of the king's military, judicial, economic, and social responsibilities from the personal monarchy of the early period to the increa~ingly centralized realm of the fourth century. Chapter Four concentrates on the religious aspects of Argead kingship, reviewing the monarch's religious duties· and interpreting a widespread foundation myth as an attempt to distinguish Argead status by its divine origin and its specific cult responsibilities.
    [Show full text]